8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 1/7
How
G
A ne
“…expl
and chaLes Dakenretired SV
w Eff
Get Pe
leade
ins extrellenging d s HR, CN Rail
fectiv
eople
Joh
ship to
ely well ifficulty...
Montreal, C
ve M
e ont
hn K
l for th
common
anada
MIDD
to th
Kuy
e Toug
DLE M
he SA
ype
est Ro
M AN
AM E
ers
letm in m
NAG
PAG
anage
ERS
GE
ent!
8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 2/7
The
Thi
in t
ho
mid
the
1.
Su
rep
sub
del
inf
Su
wa
yo
Fri
Fri
wo
do
wis
the
Su
ma
san
her
exe
Se
lev
For
not
diff
7 Performan
T
article introd
e sandwich’
defining deci
‐level organiz
author of thre
The
Role
the middle
ort to be c
ordinate kno
yed,” he sai
rmation for
sighed. Bob
known to s
think you’ll
ay,” came
th
ay, she tho
king on the
e in time fo
h Bob would
priorities of
h is life for t
nagement.
dwich’ of the
role is to tr
cutional exc
ior manager
ls control ho
entrepreneu
‐for‐profits,
erence. Thes
e Drivers: Ho
e Ho
Ge
ces a new lea
hat has to del
sion‐making a
tion builder a
books on lea
f a Middle
manager w
mpleted.
cked on he
. “Bob aske
is board mee
was her bos
ep in witho
be able to ge
e response.
ght with ex
eekend if I
Tuesday’s
talk to me fi
y people!
e middle m
his level of
organization
nslate senio
ellence with
s want goals
well that h
rs and leade
he challenge
e leaders are
w Effective Mi
Pew Eff
Peo
ership tool fo
iver results wi
uthority upfro
d leadership
ership and sel
anager
s waiting ex
t the appoi
door. “My
me to work
ting so I had t
s, the gener
t warning. “
t it to me?”
asperation.
ant to get
anagement
rst, before he
nager – the
manager is t
. In a larger
r manageme
the layers
and plans a
ppens.
s of smaller
is similar b
both the mid
ddle Manager
for ctive
le onby J
helping mid ‐l
th limited con
t gets everyo
oach. He is a
‐development
pectantly fo
nted time,
report will
on getting h
o set it aside.
l manager.
Okay, when
Sue asked. “
hat leaves
y presentati
meeting. I j
goes changi
oughest role
e ‘meat in t
ompany, his
t strategy i
that report
hieved. Jun
businesses a
t with one k
‐ and the sen
s Get People
a Midd
to th
ohn Kuypers
vel managers
rol over how
e onto the sa
former execut
, including Wh
a
er
be
im
”
He
do
By
e
on
st
ng
in
he
or
to
in.
ior
nd
ey
ior
levelsunco
make
getti
and h
The
reput
realit
juggl
other
page.
being
nto the Same
ce le Ma
Sam
succeed at th
o get those re
me page with
ive in consum
o’s The Driver
in the
orga
fortable po
s the final ca
g people to
igh quality re
reat French
ed to have s
and give ho
senior exec
words,
they
This tough jo
the bad guy.
PEOPLE MA
THE
Page Joh
ri nage
e Pag
toughest role
sults. The 7
out being the
r products an
Anyway, publi
ization. This
sition of bei
ll but still has
buy in and e
sults. This ca
military lead
aid, ““The ro
e.” For midd
tive hopes w
need
to
getb is much eas
This article e
NAGEMENT CH
TOUGHEST AT
ww.perform
Kuypers ©2
erss
e
in manageme
erformance D
bad guy. Joh
investment b
hed by Carsw
puts
these
l
g the senio
the mid‐leve
xecute plans
be tough fo
r, Napoleon
le of a lead
le managers,
ith junior lev
everyone
oier if they ca
plains a way
LLENGES ARE
HE 3RD
LEVEL
nceshift.com
09 Page 1
:
t – the ‘meat
rivers clarifies
Kuypers is a
anking and is
ell.
eaders in
th
r leader wh
l challenge o
with passio
r owners.
Bonaparte i
r is to defin
their role is t
l realities. I
to
the
sam do it withou
to do that.
OFTEN
8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 3/7
The
The
lea
ma
the
An
Cul
Th
dec
ana
– a
en
im
dea
ove
Dri
que
In
dir
Ca
gen
be
cre
ow
ma
un
My
thr
wa
Aft
US
pro
coll
out
poli
quewit
car
cro
str
fle
7 Performan
7 Performa
ership tool
nagement dif
basis of the t
way? Mak
ture.
re are count
ision. Surve
lyze the data
ll of these le
, however, s
lementation.
d in its track
rruled by ‘w
ers is a lead
stion.
y early 30s, I
ctor of mark
ada. It wa
eral manage
in working c
te a new ad
made‐in‐Ca
king authorit
erstood the
acceptance
atened by th
as much a m
er much coll
ad agency c
posed a wil
eagues’ appr
landish and
tically risky t
stioned. Ho
any other
fully and cle
ss‐border c
tegist, my b
me into Ne
e Drivers: Ho
ce Drivers (
hat address
ficulties: Wh
eam collabor
ing the Shif
less tools to
the custom
, measure th
ad to makin
omeone has
Until a deci
. Furthermo
ho gets to
rship tool t
experienced
eting with a
a third‐lev
r. I was faci
ollaborativel
ertising cam
nada comme
did not sit
cost‐saving r
of
the
decisi
e change an
otive as anyt
boration upf
mpetition, o
d creative i
oval. It was
doomed to
o say so, and
ever, my
in
choice. I
arly as I coul
operation
ss’s boss, th
York to expl
w Effective Mi
he 7PDs) is
s the root c
o gets to deci
tion book,
t To A Coll
help leaders
er, test mark
results, get
the ‘right’
to authorize
sion is appro
re, many ‘rig
decide.’ The
at addresses
this in a majo
major bever
l position r
g a major c
with our US
paign, rather
rcials. This s
well with m
easons behin
n was
temp
by my suspi
ing else.
ront, includi
ur winning N
dea that ca
an idea whi
ailure. I kn
I knew my m
er convictio
oiced my d
. Out of res
nd my re
e North Ame
ain my objec
ddle Manager
a collaborat
ause of mid
e? The 7PD
ho’s The Dri borative Te
make the ri
et the produ
expert opinio
ecision. In t
he decision
ed, work sto
t’ decisions
7 Performa
this underlyi
r way. I was t
ge company
porting to t
ange. I had
head office
than doing
hift in decisi
even thoug
d the decisi
ered by
feeli
ion that polit
g a Canada
w York age
ptured my
h struck me
w it would
otives would
s could
not
li
sagreement
ect for buildi
utation as
rican preside
ions.
s Get People
ive
le
is
er m
ht
ct,
ns
he
or
ps
et
ce
ng
he
in
he
to
to
ur
n‐
h I
n.
ng
ics
s.
cy
S
as
be
be
ve
as
ng
a
nt,
I felt
filled
itself.
I did s
top b
camp
large
acco
agen
achie
teste
To m
meeti
say, “
M
When
decisi
decisi
make
will
mana
unde
If yo
decisi
with
There
organ
share
nto the Same
nervous as I
with twenty
There I was
o as best as I
rass decide
aign. A mo
board
roo
nt person f
y spelled ou
ed the lowe
. The room
y surprise, n
ng. I said no
I told you so,”
ID‐LEVEL MAN
you are a mi
on, but you
on. Your a
the most of
ake or bre
ger, your a
stand this
re
succeed, y
ons and lead
assion and s
are three les
ization in thi
d decision‐m
Page Joh
walked into
eople includ
given my op
could but the
to proceed
nth later, we
to
hear
t
rom the Lo
t the results
t scores of a
as silent as t
one said a
hing either, k
that was for
AGEMENT CA
ddle manage
usually do
ility to unde
the decision‐
ak your car
bility to hel
ality of
middl
u will get t
their people
ccess.
sons for mid‐
story. First,
aking is mal
www.perfor
Kuypers ©2
the 45th flo
ing the head
ortunity to
y were not c
with testin
re‐assemble
e research
Angeles‐ba
. The test
y campaign
he presentati
ord to me
nowing this
sure! ☺
BE A FRUSTR
r, you may b
ot get to m
rstand this,
aking powe
er. If you
your mid
e manageme
em to supp
to execute y
level manag
you must be
unctioning.
anceshift.co
09 Page
r boardroo
of the agenc
ake my case
nvinced. Th
the new a
d in an eve
results.
A
sed researc
ampaign ha
they had eve
on continued
s we left th
as no time t
TING ROLE
right about
ake the fina
accept it an
r you do hav
are a senio
le manager
nt life
is
vital
ort your fina
our strategie
rs of any siz
aware of ho
Second, yo
.
.
l
.
l
8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 4/7
The
mu
to
lift
ma
Dri
pa
2.
The
ma
hav
dis
pa
it is
to s
fro
The
aut
ma
dec
dec
get
con
of
dec
likeatti
Mi
mi
pro
mi
For
suc
do
job
Yo
Yo
“th
wa
resi
are
wit
7 Performan
st make a shi
et alignmen
he performa
ke up the th
ers in order
e without bei
hat are Th
7 Performa
kes clear who
e a say in h
ussing this u
e, they buy i
a decision w
ucceeding at
a mid‐level
7 Performan
hority scale.
king power
isions are
ision.” Insert
made pre‐e
flicts. Its eff
n election.
ided. Then
it. This
cla
tude proble
dle manage
d shift.
cesses but
dle manager
many high
ceeded at w
e. Suddenly,
is
to
help
th hire people
check qualit
right things
t to do thin
stance to yo
tough to di
becoming a
e Drivers: Ho
ft in who has
and action.
nce of those
ree steps of
to effectivel
ng the “bad
7 Performa
ce Drivers is
gets to deci
w work gets
pfront, peopl
and commi
ith which the
and enjoyin
position.
ce Drivers is
It clarifies
and to wha
ade. I call
ing this one
pts future c
ct is similar
e know in a
e accept th
rity resolves
s.
leadership
iddle mana
ot tasks.
does not pa
achievers, th
rk because i
others are d
em
succeed.
for them. Yo
y for them.
right.” Inste
gs their own
r experience
est. There i
mid‐level m
w Effective Mi
what level o
Third, you m
ou lead. The
applying Th
get people
uy.”
ce Drivers?
a leadershi
e and to wh
done by wh
e not only ge
to the final
don’t agree.
the job of m
based on a
upfront wh
t degree, b
it “The deci
xtra step int
onflicts and
o how we ac
dvance how
e outcome, e
many
com
success mus
gers manag
ike a sports
ticipate on t
is is a major
was satisfyi
ing the fun t
You
get
buu improve sy
our job is to
ad of appreci
way ‐ imag
and their re
s a loss of co
nager that h
ddle Manager
power in or
st act wisely
se three lesso
7 Performa
onto the sa
program t
t degree oth
om. By ope
onto the sa
ecision, eve
This is the k
anaging peo
ecision‐maki
has decisi
fore any fi
sion before t
how decisio
esolves curr
cept the res
he winner g
ven if we do
unication a
t begin with
e people a
coach, a go
e playing fie
letdown. Y
g to get thin
ings while y
gets
for
thetems for the
ensure they
ating that, t
ine that! Th
eated mista
ntrol that g
rts.
s Get People
er
to
ns
ce
e
at
rs
ly
e
if
ey
le
ng
n‐
al
he
ns
nt
lts
ts
n’t
nd
a
nd
od
ld.
ou
gs
ur
m.
m.
do
ey
eir
es
es
The 7
help
langu
invol
super
The
meta
Many
who
Onck
Busin
subse
of th
this t
secon
each
proje
witho
When
“driv
defau
passe
how
crash
of au
and o
and l
This
maki
leade
appre
nto the Same
Performance
ake this tra
age and a
ement the p
visor when a
PDs achiev
hor: Who’s
leadership t
is the real o
en captured t
ess Review
quent 1984 b
funniest an
pic. What’s
d important
person’s
limt or assignm
ut a 100% co
you assign
r” of the wo
lt then, you
nger – the s
well the driv
es! For this r
hority in ho
ut of
habit.
adership pro
driver‐passe
g authority
rship metho
ciates a pass
Page Joh
Drivers is a l
nsition. The
framework
erformer sho
ask, assignm
es this usin
he
driver?
roubles trac
ner or ‘driv
his reality bri
rticle, “Who
ook, Managi
most insigh
ifferent abo
player – the
its
and
obligent done. A
mitted deci
work, you ar
k. She is the
re not. If sh
akeholder.
er performs.
eason, passe
the driver
This is
a roo
blems.
ger metap
is central to
d. Like driv
enger who c
www.perfor
Kuypers ©2
adership to
7PDs provid
that clarifie
uld expect fr
ent or projec
a simple
to a lack of
er’ of the w
lliantly in his
’s Got The
g Manageme
ful books I’v
t The 7PDs is
passenger –
ations
for
gter all, no w
sion behind it
e making th
doer – the
e is the drive
passenger
You are a
gers retain a
rives, often
cause of
po
or for shar
The 7 Perfor
ing a car,
n give advic
anceshift.co
09 Page
l designed t
es a commo
how muc
om his or he
is delegated
yet powerfu
clarity abou
rk. Willia
1974 Harvar
onkey?” Hi
nt Time is on
ever read o
that it adds
and it define
tting
a
taskrk gets don
!
t person th
erformer. B
r, you are th
as a stake i
fected if sh
certain shar
unconsciousl
wer struggle
ing decision
ance Driver
a lost drive
on where t
.
l
,
8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 5/7
The
go.
acti
she
pas
in a
or
aut
fro
cau
Wit
a s
100
dri
pas
3.
Th
inc
intan
wo
giv
irrit
evi
yo
for
7 Performan
His advice
ons of the dr
is going, d
senger tellin
uthority, wit
how to driv
hority can
le
being com
se of perfor
h The 7PDs,
aled level of
% between
er’s relative
senger at eac
hree Stages
secret to g
rporate the
your daily
l
Action. St
k to be off th
n situation.
ated by wh
ence that s
disagree.
you at work,
TH
e Drivers: Ho
gives him a
iver. Similarl
es not app
her how to
both partie
e. This mi
d the
perfor
itted to deli
ance proble
here are sev
decision‐ma
hem. The
share of
h level, as fol
to Getting P
etting peopl
hree stages
adership pr
p I: The Rift
e rails betwe
One plain‐a
t others ar
meone is m
n the other
it means y
E 7 PERFOR
ECISION AUT
w Effective Mi
hare of resp
y, a driver w
eciate an o
rive! This ref
wanting con
‐match in
er to
rebel,
r
ering great r
s for middle
n types of dri
ing authorit
umbers bel
uthority co
ows:
eople on the
onto the s
of The 7 Perf
ctices‐Awa
is to notice
n drivers and
s‐day clue is
doing. Th
aking a decis
hand, if thin
u are on th
ANCE DRIV
HORITY SCAL
ddle Manager
nsibility in t
o knows wh
erly‐controlli
lects an overl
trol over wh
ecision‐maki
esent
or
deta
sults –a cent
anagers.
vers that foll
that add up
w indicate t
pared to t
Same Page
me page is
ormance Driv
eness, Attitu
what is causi
passengers i
when you f
at is the cl
ion with whi
s are hummi
same page
RS
E
s Get People
he
re
ng
ap
re
ng
ch
ral
w
to
he
he
to
ers
de
ng
a
el
ar
ch
ng
as
those
decid
You
ask t
telltal
1. So
2. Se
3. In
4. Co
5. Pe
6. Co
7. Tr
Peopl
when
decisithis
make
exec
the li
levels
smoo
100%
Figur
Step
leade
is ca
mem
The s
Step
powe
nto the Same
around you.
e?’ Things ge
an recogniz
eir supervis
e signs:
lo Driver:
lf ‐directed D
ormative Dri
nsultative Dr
rmission Dri
mpliant Driv
ansfer Driver:
e perform i
they “drive”
on‐making
a
nd skilfully
s good midd
te and senio
nk. The foll
that “fit” Th
thly when e
committed d
e 1: Driver‐P
I of
The
7 P
rship progra
sing perfor
ers of the te
econd step i
2: The Shif
r shift and w
Page Joh
There are n
dealt with, r
e the seven
r (or others)
“I
don’t
iver: “I need
er: “Look
iver: “Can yo
er: “May I
r: “Just t
“Will y
a more co
their job res
uthority that
getting agre
le manager’s
r people deci
wing chart s
7 Performan
ch level is i
ecisions.
ssenger are
rformance D
teaches lea
ance to brea
am.
n applying T
. The 7PDs
y people de
www.perfor
Kuypers ©2
issues abou
esolved and i
driver types
for help. L
need
anyon
a resource fr
at what I’ve d
u give me so
do it this wa
ell me what t
u take over f
mitted and
ponsibilities
fits them.
ment about
successful.
de. Middle
hows the se
ce Drivers. T
alignment,
aligned at 10
ivers middle
ers how to r
k down with
e 7 Perform
explains ho
elop a ‘bad’
anceshift.co
09 Page
‘who gets t
plemented.
by how the
ook for thes
’s help.”
om you.”
one…”
e advice?”
?”
do.”
or me?”
positive wa
t the level o
nderstandin this is wha
Junior peopl
managers ar
en passenge
ings progres
adding up t
0%
managemen
cognize wha
one or mor
nce Drivers i
to make
ttitude if it i
8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 6/7
The
not
lea
In
per
Per
yo just
this
Wh
co
bei
yo
wel
Pe
giv
adv
co
wa
wo
vet
whi
7P
wit
acc
A s
the
rev
pla
dec
is l
req
tha
Dis
7 Performan
done well.
ership insig
heory, each
formance dri
mission 40:
want
your
s tell her and
be? In pra
en people ar
fort zone, t
g unhappy o
won’t succ
l. That some
ple get upse
n to them.
ertising exa
mercials felt
taken awa
ld have the
o any decisi
ch limited m
s is people
in their limi
ept that reali
econd reaso
accepted
ised after th
at the expe
ides not to a
wered beca
uired a key st
t is entirely
agreements
e Drivers: Ho
Like a sol
ts for effecti
of us is c
ver level. If
river, then s
bordinate
to
let her run w
ctice, howev
pushed out
ey feel risk
r stressed ou
ssfully get
ne could eve
when the a
The main re
ple, letting
threatening
from me a
liked :60
ns. Instead,
to voicing
now they h
ts and oblig
y and get ba
people’s
at
ecision‐mak
e fact. For
ted Permissi
pprove it. La
se you didn’
ep that you
controlled b
bout who g
w Effective Mi
ved mystery
e middle ma
pable of op
our boss wa
art asking fo
be
a
Self ‐
dirith it. How
er, we have
ide their per
and they re
t. If you don’
eople to bu
n be you.
thority level
ason is RISK
ther
people
o my success
d I became
pprove auth
I had :50 A
y views. Th
ve done the
tions. Stag
k to a positiv
itude gets
n
ing norms
xample, yo
on 40: driver l
ter, your per
t get someth
eren’t permi
first pl
where
underst
importaempting
Attitude
aspect
perform
each of us
ts to decide
ddle Manager
, this provi
agers.
erating at a
ts you to b
r permission!
cted
80:
drivomplicated c
comfort zon
ormance dri
ct – usually
t deal with t
in or perfo
hey want is
. In my earl
produce
my
. My driver r
a passenger.
rity so I co
vise authori
benefit of T
most they c
II helps th
attitude.
gative is
wh
get shifted
recommen
evel. Your b
ormance rati
ing done whi
ted to do in t
ce! This
the upfr
nding is
t
to
p later proble
is the o
of
ance at w
as individu
and how m
s Get People
es
ny
a
If
er,
an
es.
er
by
is,
rm
ot
ier
TV
le
I
ld
ty,
he
an
m
en
or
a
ss
ng
ch
he
is
nt
so
re‐
s.
ne
ur
rk
ls.
ch
say
decisi
negat
autho
level
happ
a sen
retre
empl
Emot
There
probl
to bei
Thes
page.
respodo th
be c
origin
disres
Effec
dyna
enga
only
comp
Perfo
probl
abou
Figur
Figur
nto the Same
e get is th
ons being m
ive, go arou
rity, show u
of quality, o
ned. They
se of
outrag
t into sull
yment opt
ional and p
may even
ms that are
ng effective
symptoms
Deeply hel
nses
that
areings around
mplex and
al core issue
pected and o
ive mid‐lev
ic and what
ement with
26% of em
liant while
mance Driver
ms are ca
who gets to
e 2: Driver an
e 3: Driver an
Page Joh
root cause
ade by other
d the middl
late or be a
r put a half ‐
ay use infla
over
the
de
n complian
ions. Mu
ysical stress
be personal
unrelated to
ith someone
ake it hard t
d beliefs an
anchored
in
ere.” A pow
demoralizing
at stake oft
ffended, bec
l managers
to do. Gallu
over one m
loyees feel
9% are act
s explains
wh
sed by a d
decide. The f
d Passenger
d Passenger
www.perfor
Kuypers ©2
. A person
s can becom
manager to
bsent, do a b
truth spin o
matory lang
ision, or
the
ce while s
tual respec
symptoms
reasons be
ork, adding
.
get people
values trig
cultural
norr play may s
. Most im
n gets lost
ming diseng
need to un
research on
illion surveys
fully engage
ively diseng
y and
what
t
river‐passen
llowing char
are in conflic
are stuck at
anceshift.co
09 Page
who dislike
e critical an
subvert thei
are‐minimu
n what reall
uage, expres
y may
quietl
eking othe
plummets
ften surface
hind attitud
complication
nto the sam
er emotiona
s
of
“how
wet in that ca
ortantly, th
s people fee
ged.
derstand thi
US employe
reveals tha
d. 55% ar
ged. The
do. Attitud
er mismatc
s reveal why:
t at >100%
100%
.
.
l
l
8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 7/7
The
Fig
the
is
vac
evi
eve
Th
str
Wit
typ
rel
diff
Co
lea
maont
littl
sup
tea
tips
oth
atti
Th
sid
atti
ma
acc
upf
ma
the
Per
7 Performan
re 2 shows
passenger b
ure to follo
uum where
ence that t
ryone
involv
7PDs helps
ggling to get
h only one c
e, there is a
tionship. N
icult!
mitting to a
er for Step I
nagers
take
o the same p
e things that
port and dev
m’s success.
and techni
ers. It also
tude issues.
great dan
tracked by
tude proble
nagement, I
ept their
ront , they ar
ny middle m
organizatio
ormance Dri
e Drivers: Ho
n authority
th want a hig
w. Figure
o one wants
hings are st
d.
iddle mana
on the same
rrect matchi
86% proba
o wonder
new agreed‐
II: The Lift.
ction
to
aligage. Action
great leader
elop new be
Who’s The D
ues for influ
rovides a to
his tool is ca
ger for mi
the many r
ms.
After
believe that
ecision‐maki
not likely to
nagers quit
and even t
vers provide
w Effective Mi
verlap wher
h level of con
3 shows a
to decide.
uck, causing
ers understa
page with so
ng passenger
ility of confl
anaging pe
upon power r
his is where
everyone,
teans doing
do to enco
aviours and s
river Anywa
encing beha
ol for analyz
led W.I.N. At
ddle manag
ed herrings
thirty yea
unless you
ng authorit
accept it. T
r are fired, a
o their own
s a means t
ddle Manager
the driver a
rol. Resistan
ecision‐maki
o action is t
frustration
d why they
meone at wo
for each dri
ict in any w
ple can be
atio sets up t
ffective mid
at
is,
get
th he hundreds
rage, reinfor
kills vital to t
provides thi
iour change
ing and solvi
itude.
ers is to
arising out
s in
busin
get people
expectatio
is is the reas
t a high cost
careers. Th
o resolve c
s Get People
nd
ce
ng
he
or
re
rk.
er
rk
so
he
le
m
of
e,
he
rty
in
ng
et
of
ss
to
ns
on
to
7
re
issues
resol
perso
party’
Nothi
agree
Most
mean
get t
betw
gives
*****
John helpin
He is Consu
books includ
publis
in Bur
Cont
www
www
nto the Same
and not tak
tion may be
n’s core valu
’s plans, may
ng lasts fo
ment to part
importantly,
s to resolve
hings done.
en a rock a
hope for the
***********
Kuypers is g companies the founder
lting. John i on leadershi ing Who’s hed by www.
lington, Cana
raining: a v
oaching:
uality Impr
eam Respo
ulture Shift
eynote Spe
he Book:
hift To A Col
ct John at: j
.performanc
.whosthedri
Page Joh
e things pers
possible. De
es and belief
result in en
rever and
may be a wis
The 7 Perfo
differences,
For midd
nd a hard pl
oughest role
************ culture shi
grow to the nof Performa
s the author and person
The Driver carswell.com Ja.
The co
collaborati
Elements i
ariety of pro
evelop high
ovement: B
nsibilities: R
: Build a coll
eches: For
ho’s The D
laborative Te
hnk@perfo
shift.com
eranyway.c
www.perfor
Kuypers ©2
onally. In so
cisions that
s, or do not
ing the wor
coming to
choice for al
rmance Drive
et on the sa
le managers
ace, it defin
in managem
******* t expert ext level. nce Shift of three l change Anyway? ohn lives
pany off
e leadershi
clude:
ressive pro
performance
etter proces
oles, accoun
aborative te
eetings & c
iver Anyway
am Culture (
manceshift.
m
anceshift.co
09 Page
me cases, n
onflict with
fit into eithe
relationship
an amicabl
l involved.
rs provides
me page an
sandwiche
s reality an
nt.
ers severa
p programs
rams
leaders
es and
tools
tabilities
m culture
nferences
? Making Th
hapters.ca)
om
.
l
.