Holland’s Theory and Implications for Academic Advising and Career Counseling Technical Report 381
by
Robert Reardon, Ph.D. Professor and Program Director
Emily Bullock, MS
Career Advisor
Career Center UCA 4150 The Florida State University
Tallahassee, FL 32306-2490
January 20, 2004
1 The authors thank James Sampson, Jill Lumsden, Jeff Garis, Jill Parker, Linda Mahler, Janet Lenz, and
John Smart for comments on early drafts of this manuscript. Correspondence regarding this article should
be addressed to Dr. Robert Reardon, Career Center UCA4150, The Florida State University, Tallahassee,
FL 32306-2490; phone: 850-644-9777; email: [email protected].
2
Holland’s Theory and Implications for Academic Advising and Career Counseling
John Holland’s typological theory of persons and environments is regarded as
the most influential in the field of career counseling (Brown, 2002), but this has not
carried over to the field of higher education and academic advising (Smart, Feldman, &
Ethington, 2000). This conundrum led us to explore whether or not Holland’s theory and
research were relevant and could shed light on the behavior and organization of college
faculty and students, which could ultimately improve the effectiveness of academic
advising and career counseling. This article summarizes the results of our exploration.
Holland’s person-environment interaction theory is especially important to
scholars and practitioners in education and psychology. “John Holland pioneered in
assessing the environments of colleges and universities and their influence on students.
His research has been central in the development of knowledge about nonacademic
accomplishments. His theory of vocational personalities and work environments
revolutionized the delivery of vocational assistance worldwide. He made contributions to
research on originality and interpersonal competence” (G. Gottfredson, 1999, p. 15).
Another reviewer noted, “Research on his theory is voluminous and unabating. His
theoretical insights are now at the center of any comprehensive review . . .. The
widespread use of his inventories is huge. . . .” (Borgen, 1991, pp. 275-276).
As colleges and universities have grown in size, scope, and organizational
complexity, some students have found it difficult to find a “home” (Astin, 1984). While
students may identify with a student organization, residence hall, or activity program, we
believe that the academic department is the entity where students are likely to find
important mentors, peers, involvement, direction, and inspiration. Academic departments
have an inherent, varied mixture of characteristics that are created by the interests and
behaviors of the faculty. If students can recognize, differentiate, and understand these
3
diverse academic environments and the faculty who dominate them with respect to
Holland’s theoretical model, we believe they are more likely to find a place within the
university that will increase their satisfaction, involvement, and persistence.
In this article, we begin by examining several aspects of academic advising and
career counseling services for students. These include definitions, the need for theory-
based approaches in advising research and practice, and Holland’s current and potential
contributions to this field. We then examine Holland’s theory and the findings from more
than 20 studies by Smart and others (Smart et al., 2000) of college faculty and students
in academic departments. We conclude with the presentation of a practical approach for
integrating a Holland-based system of academic advising and career counseling. We
believe this service-delivery model provides some novel ideas and procedures for
enhancing this important area of student services.
Definitions
Although the terms academic advising and career counseling are familiar, it is
important to define them as they are used in this article. Ender, Winston, and Miller
(1984) defined developmental academic advising as “a systematic process based on a
close student-advisor relationship intended to aid students in achieving educational,
career, and personal goals through the utilization of the full range of institutional and
community resources” (p. 19). Later, Creamer (2000) defined it as “an educational
activity that depends on valid explanations of complex student behaviors and institutional
conditions to assist college students in making and executing educational and life plans”
(p. 18).
Sears (1982) defined career counseling as “a one-to-one or small group
relationship between a client and a counselor with the goal of helping the client(s)
integrate and apply an understanding of self and the environment to make the most
appropriate career decisions and adjustments” (p. 139). She further defined career as
4
“the totality of work one does in his/her lifetime” (p. 139) and work as “conscious effort,
other than that having as its primary purpose either coping or relaxation, aimed at
producing benefits for oneself and/or for oneself and others” (p. 142).
The distinctions between academic advising and career counseling are primarily
a matter of scope and emphasis. Academic advising is more narrowly focused on
college and university students and life/career decision making related to curricular and
co-curricular activities. Career counseling is a broader, more comprehensive term not
limited to educational settings. However, both functions involve a process of individual or
small group interventions to help persons use information to make educational and
occupational decisions that are consistent with their personal goals, values, interests,
and skills. We believe that a theory that informs career counseling, such as John
Holland’s RIASEC theory, can also inform academic advising.
Holland’s Theoretical Contributions
Holland’s typological theory (Holland, 1997) specifies a theoretical connection
between personality and environment that makes it possible to use the same RIASEC
classification system for both persons and fields of study or occupations. Many
inventories and career assessment tools use the typology to enable individuals to
categorize their interests and personal characteristics in terms of combinations of the six
types: Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, or Conventional. These six
types are briefly defined in Table 1.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert Table 1 Descriptions of Holland Types about here
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to RIASEC theory, if a person and an environment have the same or
similar codes, e.g., Investigative person in an Investigative environment, then the person
will likely be satisfied and persist in that environment (Holland, 1997). This satisfaction
5
will result from individuals being able to express their personality in an environment that
is supportive and includes other persons who have the same or similar personality traits.
It should be noted that neither people nor environments are exclusively one type but
rather combinations of all six types. Their dominant type is an approximation of an ideal,
modal type. The profile of the six types can be described in terms of the degree of
differentiation (flat or uneven profile), consistency (level of similarity of interests or
characteristics on the RIASEC hexagon for the first two letters of a three-letter Holland
code), or identity (stability characteristics of the type). Each of these factors moderates
predictions about the behavior related to the congruence level between a person and an
environment. Persons and environments are typically described proportionally in terms
of the most highly weighted three of the six Holland types, e.g., Lawyer, ESI; Accounting,
CEI.
The environments of college campuses, fields of study, work positions, and
occupations can also be classified using the RIASEC system (G. Gottfredson & Holland,
1996). Holland’s early efforts with the National Merit Scholarship Corporation (NMSC)
and the American College Testing Program enabled him to look at colleges and
academic disciplines as environments. It is important to note that RIASEC theory had its
roots in higher education and later focused on occupations. However, almost any social
setting, e.g., a family-owned business, a classroom, or a work group, might be
characterized in terms of a RIASEC environment. Every aspect of the theory can be
applied to different kinds of environments.
L. S. Gottfredson and Richards (1999) traced the history of Holland’s efforts to
classify educational and occupational environments. Holland initially studied the
numbers of incumbents in a particular environment to classify occupations or colleges,
but he later moved to study the characteristics of the environment independent of the
persons in it. College catalogs and descriptions of academic disciplines were among the
6
public records used to study institutional environments. Astin and Holland (1961)
developed the Environmental Assessment Technique (EAT) while at the NMSC as a
method for measuring college environments.
Success in measuring faculty and the curriculum led Richards to explore
differences in environments in Japanese (Richards, 1973) and British Commonwealth
universities (Richards, 1974), U. S. law schools (Richards, 1987b), and Historically Black
colleges (Richards, 1987a). For example, Richards found that Japanese universities
placed less emphasis on the Artistic area and more on the Realistic area than U.S.
universities. The most recent instruments for measuring environments are the Position
Classification Inventory (PCI; G. Gottfredson & Holland, 1991), a direct theory-based
measure of occupational environments, and the Environmental Identity Scale (EIS;
Holland, 1997). These instruments make it possible to study college faculty directly and
thus advance the study of academic disciplines and their effects on college students.
Those who study or provide services to college students need to understand the
importance of Holland’s RIASEC theory. For example, Day and Rounds (1998) reported
that the RIASEC typology was used similarly by ethnically diverse groups of U.S.
students to organize information about their interests and options. This means that
varied cultural subgroups in the United States have a sufficiently common social and
educational experience that RIASEC theory and related practical applications can be
applied to almost everyone. More recently, Tracey and Darcy (2002) found that college
students whose schema for organizing information about interests and occupations
differed from Holland’s RIASEC structure had less career certainty and more career
indecision. This finding suggests that the RIASEC hexagon may have a normative
benefit regarding the classification of occupations and fields of study.
Scholars have used Holland’s theory to study vocational behavior (G.
Gottfredson, 1999) and industrial and organizational behavior (Muchinsky, 1999), but
7
this is not as true for higher education scholars. We searched the Journal of College
Student Development (JCSD), the NACADA Journal, and the NASPA Journal from
1994-2002 for articles on academic advising or educational planning that were based on
Holland’s theory. We found no relevant publications in the NACADA or NASPA Journals
and one in JCSD that examined Holland’s RIASEC typology in relation to college
students. Another example of inattention is Creamer’s (2000) chapter, “Use of Theory in
Academic Advising,” which extolled the benefits of theory-based advising while providing
a cursory reference to Holland’s 1973 book rather than the 1997 edition. Smart et al.
(2000) found only a handful of Holland citations in a search of the Journal of Higher
Education, Research in Higher Education, Higher Education, and The Review of Higher
Education. Smart et al. further noted that the lack of a theory base is a major impediment
to attaining accurate knowledge concerning academic disciplines, which led Smart et al.
to conduct a major national study of college faculty and students based on Holland’s
theory. We discuss this research and other related studies in the following section.
Holland-Based Research on College Students and Faculty
When Holland’s theory is used to classify occupations, the distribution across the
six RIASEC categories varies in relation to the level of cognitive skill and ability required
by the occupation. In other words, occupations differ according to level. G. Gottfredson
and Holland (1996) created a Complexity Rating (Cx) to estimate the cognitive skill and
ability associated with an occupation. A Cx rating of 65 or higher is associated with an
occupation requiring a college degree and possibly post-graduate work and on-the-job
training of 4-10 years, while a Cx level of 50 might characterize an occupation requiring
a high school degree and a year or more of on the job training. For example, the Cx
rating for Nuclear-Fuels Research Engineer (IRC) is 80 while Shoe Shiner (CRE) is 37
and Counselor (SAE) is 68.
8
College level occupations are least frequently associated with the Conventional
and Realistic categories, while Investigative and Artistic work are most likely associated
with college level employment or the highest level of cognitive ability. Reardon, Vernick,
and Reed (in press) reported the estimated mean Cx ratings across the six kinds of work
were Realistic = 52; Investigative = 72; Artistic = 69; Social = 63; Enterprising = 60; and
Conventional = 55, revealing a profile rating for the six kinds of work in order of highest
to lowest as IASECR. Similarly, Smart et al. (2000) found few college majors, faculty, or
students in their samples categorized as Realistic or Conventional, which led them to
exclude these two areas from their research. The fact that most college disciplines are
concentrated in Holland’s Investigative, Artistic, Social, and Enterprising areas has
important implications for students exploring educational options.
The incorporation of the concept of cognitive level, along with interests and
personality characteristics, into academic advising and career counseling in relation to
Holland’s theory will require considerable attention by professionals in these areas.
Occupations and fields of study differ not only according to interests but also the degree
of cognitive ability and skill required. Advisors and counselors are sometimes reluctant to
broach this matter with students (L. S. Gottfredson, 2003). However, Holland’s theory
provides some tools to help in this undertaking, and these can be useful in improving
advising and counseling services.
Smart et al. (2000) classified academic disciplines in terms of Holland’s RIASEC
Theory using the Educational Opportunities Finder (Rosen, Holmberg, & Holland, 1994),
and the results are shown in Table 2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert Table 2 Academic Disciplines by Holland Codes about here
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9
Smart et al. (2000) did not classify agriculture, forestry, or education (including
administration and counseling) in terms of RIASEC Theory because of a lack of relevant
data, and they excluded Realistic and Conventional disciplines from their study because
of the small numbers of college faculty and students in these disciplines. Realistic
disciplines included industrial arts, military science, electrical engineering, mechanical
engineering, marine science, drafting/design, and Conventional disciplines included
accounting, secretarial studies, data processing.
Smart, Feldman, and Ethington (2000) examined longitudinal data over a four-
year period of study (1986-1990) on approximately 2,309 college students participating
in the Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP; Higher Education Research
Institute, 1986). They found that the number of students in the Enterprising environment
over four years remained relatively stable (21% to 22%), and smaller changes occurred
in the Investigative and Artistic environments, 25% to 29% and 8% to 15%, respectively.
However, students in the Social environment increased from 22% to 34%, the largest
area of change. Smart et al. noted that about 22% of the students had freshman majors
that were undecided, not classified, or associated with Realistic or Conventional
academic environments.
Socialization Effects of Disciplines
The research of Smart et al. (2000) was based on two ideas. First, “faculty create
academic environments inclined to require, reinforce, and reward the distinctive patterns
of abilities and interests of students in a manner consistent with Holland’s theory” (p. 96).
Second, “ students are not passive participants in the search for academic majors and
careers; rather, they actively search for and select academic environments that
encourage them to develop further their characteristic interests and abilities and to enter
(and be successful in) their chosen career fields” (p. 52). In the following paragraphs, we
summarize findings relevant to these two ideas.
10
Smart et al. (2000) sought to discover whether or not changes in students over
four years were the result of their experiences in their major fields of study (academic
discipline). They reasoned that faculty chose to be in academic environments, e.g.,
academic departments, because of their preferences and values regarding the goals of
undergraduate education and their preferred ways of socializing students. Smart et al.
held that faculty are the primary representatives of academic environments and the
primary contributors to behavior patterns of students who choose those environments as
majors.
Smart et al. (2000) presented evidence from the literature and their own research
concerning the way academic departments socialize students. They reported that
“faculty members in different clusters of academic disciplines create distinctly different
academic environments as a consequence of their preference for alternative goals for
undergraduate education, their emphasis on alternative teaching goals and student
competencies in their respective classes, and their reliance on different approaches to
classroom instruction and ways of interacting with students inside and outside their
classes” (p. 238). Furthermore, these environments “have a strong socializing influence
on change and the stability of students’ abilities and interests—that is, what students do
and do not learn or acquire as a consequence of their collegiate experiences (p. 238).”
Faculty in Investigative, Artistic, Social, and Enterprising disciplines create
academic environments in a manner consistent with Holland’s theory (Smart et al., 2000).
Moreover, these environments were the primary contributors to differential patterns of
change and stability in students, irrespective of students’ personality types, e.g., Artistic
student in a Social environment. Smart et al. (2000) noted that “the degree to which
academic environments are ‘successful’ in their efforts to socialize students to their
respective patterns of abilities and interests thus appears to be differ considerably, with
Artistic and Investigative environments being the most ‘successful’ and the Social and
11
Enterprising environments being less ‘successful’ (p. 146).” Overall, Smart et al.
concluded that the socialization assumption of Holland’s theory was supported. These
findings have important implications for academic advising that are explored later in this
paper.
Students and Major Change
Thus far, we have concentrated our analysis on the impact of four disciplines in
socializing students toward the development of interests and skills predicted by
Holland’s (1997) typological theory. But what about the personal choices made by
students in selecting a discipline? In order to study this phenomenon, Smart et al. (2000)
classified students as primary or secondary recruits. Primary recruits were defined as
students initially selecting a discipline and staying in that field over four years.
Secondary recruits were those in a different major in the fourth year.
Regarding primary recruits, 2/3s of freshmen initially selecting majors in the
Social area remained in that area over four years, while conversely slightly more than
half of the students in the Enterprising area persisted over four years. Students in the
Artistic and Investigative areas both persisted over four years at 64%. Overall, about
2/3s of freshmen persisted in one of the four disciplines initially selected, and 1/3
changed to another area. Regarding the secondary recruits (those in a different major
after four years), the question might be asked, “Where did they go?” Given that students
initially entering the Social area were most likely to persist in that area, the students in
the Investigative, Artistic, an Enterprising areas were most frequently secondary recruits
to the Social area (about 19% for each of them).
When environments (percentage of seniors in each of the four areas) rather than
entering students were examined, Smart et al. (2000) found that from 1/3 to 1/2 of the
four environments were composed of primary recruits, and about half of the sample were
secondary recruits, e.g., the seniors who had changed their majors. This means that
12
almost half the seniors ended up in a discipline that was different from their initial choice.
This was most notable in the Artistic environment where 2/3 of the students were
secondary recruits from one of the other areas and did not intend to major in the Artistic
area in their freshman year. About 1/3 of the students migrating into the Social area
came from Investigative, Enterprising, or undecided areas. Students moving into the
Investigative area were most likely to come from the Enterprising area, and vice versa.
These data reveal the fluid nature of students’ major selections and the heterogeneous
nature of the four environments with respect to the students’ initial major preferences.
Socialization in Relation to Student Characteristics
The specific findings of Smart et al. (2000) regarding the impact of socialization
for the four discipline environments with respect to student personality characteristics
are summarized below. The variability in the socialization styles and the effects of the
environments, as well as how socialization effected the student’s congruence with the
environments are described. It will be recalled that a high level match between the
person and the environment, e.g., Investigative person in Investigative major, indicates
high congruence.
Faculty in Investigative environments place primary attention on developing
analytical, mathematical, and scientific competencies, with little attention given to
character and career development. They rely more than other faculty on formal and
structured teaching-learning, they are subject-matter centered, and they have specific
course requirements. They focus on examinations and grades. This environment has the
highest percentage of primary recruits. All students in Investigative environments
increased their abilities and interests in this area, and this was even stronger if they were
Investigative students at entry (primary recruits). Investigative students in disciplines
outside of the Investigative environment did not increase their abilities and skills in the
Investigative area.
13
Artistic environments focus on aesthetics and an emphasis on emotions,
sensations, and the mind. The curriculum stresses learning about literature and the arts,
as well as becoming a creative thinker. Faculty also emphasize character development,
along with student freedom and independence in learning. Varied instructional strategies
are used. About two-thirds of students in the Artistic environment did not anticipate
majoring in the Artistic environment when they entered college. Artistic type students
were not more likely to initially select a major in this environment. On the other hand,
Artistic students majoring in Artistic environments did have stronger interests and
abilities in this area. Students majoring in Artistic environments did show large increases
in Artistic abilities and interests, and this was true for both primary and secondary
recruits. Artistic personalities not majoring in Artistic environments did not increase their
self-rated interests and abilities over four years.
Social environments have a strong community orientation characterized by
friendliness and warmth. Like the Artistic environment, faculty place value on developing
a historical perspective of the field and an emphasis on student values and character
development. Unlike the Artistic environment, faculty also place value on humanitarian,
teaching, and interpersonal competencies. Colleagueship and student independence
and freedom are supported, and informal small group teaching is employed. The
socialization effect of the environment was the smallest of the four areas studied and the
effects were muddled by gender. Small increases were recorded for Social students in
Social environments, but these were not much different from those for Social students in
other environments. Social disciplines seem to have the least impact and Social
students reported the least gains in related interests and abilities. Stated another way,
the Social environments appear to be the most accepting and least demanding of the
four environments studied by Smart et al. (2000).
14
The Enterprising environment has a strong orientation to career preparation and
status acquisition. Faculty focus on leadership development, the acquisition and use of
power to attain career goals, and striving for common indicators of organizational and
career success. Teaching strategies in this environment are very balanced, but faculty
like most to work with career-oriented students regarding specialized matters.
Enterprising students tended to select Enterprising environments, and in this
environment they increased their Enterprising abilities and interests. This was also true
for non-Enterprising students in the Enterprising environment. Enterprising students not
majoring in Enterprising environments did not increase their self-rated Enterprising
abilities and interests.
In summary, it is apparent that congruent students in Investigative, Artistic, and
Enterprising environments increased their pattern of self-reported interests and abilities
over four years by further developing what was already present in their personality.
These three environments also increased these related traits for incongruent students,
but the gap between the congruent and incongruent students did not decrease over time.
In other words, students in both congruent and incongruent environments made
equivalent or parallel changes in self-reported abilities and interests over four years, but
students in congruent environments had higher levels of interests and abilities at the end
of four years. Investigative and Enterprising environments had the most impact on
student characteristics. These findings, if communicated to students in academic
advising, could potentially change the nature of discussions about students’ educational
goals in college.
Implications for Advising and Counseling
Sampson, Reardon, Peterson and Lenz (2004) categorized human services
interventions into three levels, (1) self-help, (2) brief staff-assisted, and (3) individual
case-managed services. Holland’s RIASEC theory and related materials are sufficiently
15
complex and varied to complement this service delivery model. Peterson, Sampson, and
Lenz (2003) explained how the concept of student readiness for learning in college could
be implemented in academic advising and career counseling programs. We use
Holland’s theory and materials to illustrate the implementation of this idea.
Self-help services involve the self-guided use of assessment, information, and
instructional resources in a library-like or Internet-based remote setting, where resources
have been designed for independent use by individuals with a high readiness for
educational and career decision making. The Self-Directed Search: Internet Version
(Holland, Reardon, Latshaw, Rarick, Schneider, Shortridge, & St. James, 2001) is an
example of a self-help educational and career assessment designed to link students and
majors or occupations suitable for further exploration. It includes an interpretive report
incorporating concepts from Holland’s theory. Other self-help resources include the
Dictionary of Holland Occupational Codes (G. Gottfredson & Holland, 1996), the
Educational Opportunities Finder (Rosen et al., 1994), an educational and/or career
library index arranged by RIASEC codes, and computer-based educational and career
guidance systems such as Choices (Bridges.com, 2003) and DISCOVER (American
College Testing, 2003) that use Holland’s RIASEC classification to link persons and
career information. Holland’s typology is ubiquitous—it is even included in the
comprehensive, free, federal O*NET on-line system that links citizens with employment
and training options (http://www.onetcenter.org/).
By combining the concept of the self-help service delivery and the findings of
Smart et al. (2000), we can envision the creation of self-help resources such as the
following. A college could group its majors in terms of RIASEC codes, produce a printed
flier, and distribute this widely to students on posters or websites. This classification of
majors according to Holland RIASEC codes would enable students to develop an
understanding of the academic culture of the college. Large universities may have over
16
150 undergraduate majors and this can be overwhelming to students needing to pick
one field of study. Holland’s RIASEC schema helps to make this process of exploring
options less daunting.
In addition, a census of the majors with the largest and smallest numbers of
students and faculty at the college would provide information about the relative social
power of various disciplines on the campus. In effect, such a census would provide a
measured sketch of the campus culture. For example, Reardon, Lenz, and Strausberger
(1996) used the Educational Opportunities Finder (Rosen et al., 1994) to classify all of
the majors at a large university, and then identified the numbers of students majoring in
each RIASEC category (R = 5%, I = 19%, A = 13%, S = 34%, E = 19%, C = 10%). They
used these data to assess the types of students seeking services in the career center
and to design appropriate interventions. In addition, descriptive material associated with
majors could include the kinds of information summarized by Smart et al. (2000) about
course structures, learning style expectations, faculty interests and activities, and
program objectives. Other student information materials could list volunteer experiences
related to the discipline (if any), introductory classes, sample employment opportunities,
and profiles of graduates. U-Maps (Jacoby, Rue, & Allen, 1984), posters incorporating
Holland’s RIASEC typology and developed at the University of Maryland, are an earlier
example of just such an intervention.
Brief staff-assisted services, a level of services found in some career centers,
involves practitioner-guided use of assessment, information, and instructional resources
in a library, classroom, or group setting for clients with moderate readiness for career
decision making. Many interest inventories, e.g., Strong Interest Inventory, and other
tests provide results and interpretive reports based on Holland’s theory. Workshops
could be conducted using the RIASEC Game (Reardon & Lenz, 1998). This activity
provides students with an opportunity to read brief descriptions of the RIASEC types,
17
rank their top three preferences, and then go to six stations in a room marked with the
six letters and engage in a social interaction with other students there, e.g., “why did you
select this letter?,” “what are your hobbies?.” Such theory-based interventions provide
an alternative to the unsystematic, eclectic counseling and advising interventions used in
some settings. Reardon and Lenz (1999) noted that constructs important in Holland’s
theory (1997), e.g., code, congruence, differentiation, coherence, consistency, identity,
profile elevation, are readily translated into practice for use in designing interventions for
individual students with educational and career decision-making problems.
Many of the aforementioned activities are most often practiced in a traditional
career counseling setting. Yet, they could easily be adapted to the current resources and
structure of many academic advising offices. The Internet or paper-and-pencil format of
the Self-Directed Search and increased advisor knowledge of career-related resources
would do little to change the structure and typical operations of an academic advising
office but could greatly add to its effectiveness. Activities such as the RIASEC Game
(Reardon & Lenz, 1998) could be used as an aspect of fairs, workshops, panel
discussions, or expositions the academic advising office typically sponsors to further
implement the use of theory by advisors.
Individual case-managed services involve practitioner-guided use of assessment,
information, and instructional resources in an individual office, classroom, or group
setting for clients with low readiness for career decision making. This type of intervention
provides the most substantial amount of assistance possible for persons with the
greatest need for help. Categories of individual case-managed services include
individual counseling or advising by appointment, career courses with small group
interaction, and longer term group counseling or advising (e.g., an ongoing group for
undecided majors). The academic advising office is often the first stop of a student
undecided about his or her major. Serving some of the students in a group format that
18
have more complex issues related to choosing a major could save financial and human
resources. An irony of Holland’s (1997) theory is that many scholars and practitioners
(e.g., Creamer, 2000) view it as a simple matching model rather than a rich, complex
person-environment interaction theory, grounded in more than 500 studies that can
inform individual case-managed services. As demonstrated by the implementation of
Holland’s theory in the three-levels of service, it can meet simple to complex needs.
Reardon and Lenz (1998) and Holland, Gottfredson, and Nafziger (1975)
indicated that persons with poor diagnostic signs on the Self-Directed Search, e.g., lack
of congruence between expressed and assessed summary codes, low differentiation,
low consistency, low coherence among aspirations, low profile elevation, and a high
point code in the Realistic or Conventional area, were likely candidates for more
intensive interventions provided by more highly trained personnel. High Artistic codes
may also be problematic because of the student’s preference for a non-rational
approach to decision making (Holland et al., 1975). Persons with such diagnostic
indicators will likely need more time and professional, individualized assistance in career
problem solving and decision making.
Students who are unsure about what discipline or field to pursue might benefit
from a thoughtful examination of the institutional context of their educational and career
decisions. Given the differences in academic departments and their differential
socialization effects (Smart et al., 2000), a student’s understanding of the personally
desired outcomes of a baccalaureate degree, along with a review of his or her
personality characteristics, could be addressed in an individual counseling or advising
situation. For example, a student with a Social type personality might decide to develop
skills and interests emphasized in the Investigative environment. Such a choice would
involve various personal adjustments, costs, and compromises. Holland’s theory could
provide a conceptual basis for such a decision.
19
Smart et al.’s research reveals some of the variations in academic departments
and suggests implications for college and university organizational systems. It is
important for counselors and advisors to inform students about the impact of majors and
academic disciplines on the development of student interests and skills. At present,
advisors make students aware of many aspects of a major, e.g., required courses,
prerequisites, entrance requirements, and the occupations most closely aligned with the
major. Providing additional information based on the research findings by Smart et al.
(2000) regarding the way academic environments socialize or affect students pursuing
that major will make students better “consumers” of majors or “shoppers” of academic
programs (Reardon, Sampson, & Lenz, 2000).
Caveats and Additional Ideas
This section addresses some of the limitations of this analysis, as well as some
of the further implications for higher education beyond the areas of academic advising
and career counseling. In this paper we have emphasized the differences in the ways
faculty socialize students into disciplines, but there are also universal qualities among
faculty that should not be overlooked. For example, faculty across all disciplines
generally prize and value students’ intellectual development, academic and personal
integrity, and high achievement.
Although the Enterprising environment typically emphasizes career preparation,
this does not mean that it is the only discipline that prepares college students for
employment. Nevertheless, some students (and/or their parents) believe that a major in
business is the only way to prepare for a job after graduation. This kind of thinking needs
to be addressed jointly by academic advising and career counseling offices. Students
need to understand that career preparation is relevant to and appropriate for majors in
all RIASEC disciplines, not just the Enterprising area, and that advising and counseling
services can help all students prepare for employment after graduation.
20
In this analysis we have only used one letter of a RIASEC code, but Holland’s
matching model is build around three-letter codes. Two- and three-letter codes would
provide more precision in matching persons and environments, but such precision might
be misplaced, especially given the current state of knowledge regarding higher
education environments. The measurement of environments is problematic because the
codes for majors, occupations, and jobs have not been assessed by direct measurement.
Direct measures of educational environments using the Position Classification Inventory
(Gottfredson & Holland, 1991) would be preferable to the classifications based on
indirect measures currently available, e.g., Educational Opportunities Finder (Rosen et
al., 1994).
Counselors and advisors operating from Holland’s theoretical system would need
to be fully informed about the theory, the research that supports it, the instruments that
are based upon it, and the counseling and advising techniques that could be derived
from it. Such theory-driven practice might represent a new paradigm, especially in
academic advising. Holland’s (1997) theory, like other typological theories, has the most
power when the extremes of wealth, social class, genetic traits, and health are not in
effect. In other words, Holland’s theory works best for people in general rather than at
the extremes of any personal trait or environmental characteristic. The professional
judgment of counselors and advisors needs to take these matters into account in work
with students.
Beyond the implications for advising and counseling services, Smart et al. (2000)
noted that students typically take a variety of liberal studies or general education courses
in their first two years. Some of these courses are new and unfamiliar to students’
interests and abilities. Given student attrition in the freshman year and the likelihood of
them flourishing in congruent environments, it is possible that the typical pattern should
be reversed and beginning students should take most courses in environments that
21
provide opportunities, activities, tasks, and roles that correspond to their competencies,
interests, and self-perceptions. The Self-Directed Search and the Educational
Opportunities Finder could be used to facilitate this academic advising process. In
subsequent years, students would take courses that are increasingly dissimilar to their
dominant personality type. For example, Social students could take Social and
Enterprising courses in their freshman year, Artistic, Enterprising, and Investigative
courses in the sophomore year, Realistic and Conventional courses in the junior year,
and back to a Social capstone course in the senior year.
Smart et al. (2000) suggested an alternative college organizational structure in
relation to Holland codes for specific academic departments. For example, instead of a
traditional college or departmental organization grouping all professional or liberal arts
faculty together, departments could be organized by RIASEC type. Or, alternatively,
faculty within the traditionally organized unit could be informally connected with other
faculty in fields with the same Holland code. Given that different colleges typically have
varied numbers of Holland code majors represented, this arrangement would help
faculty connect with others in similar areas of work who are not in their specific college.
Use of two-letter Holland codes would provide for more precision in the identification of
congruent work environments.
Finally, research examining the degree of congruence between the Holland code
for the students’ major field of study and their personality should be undertaken to
examine the implications for poor academic performance or persistence in the major. Do
students in incongruent majors have lower GPAs and dropout at a higher rate than
students who are congruent with respect to personality and major codes?
Summary
This article examined Holland’s RIASEC person-environment interaction theory
as a practical basis for academic advising and career counseling services in colleges
22
and universities. After a brief review of Holland’s theory, including its early application in
higher education research, the book by Smart et al. (2000) was reviewed. This
examination focused on information that could be used to further support and update
resources based on Holland’s theory as it is used with university students. Smart and his
colleagues studied college faculty and students to determine if constructs related to the
socialization of students and their adjustment in college were supported by data. The
major assumptions of Holland’s theory were supported and new information related to
the development of students’ interests and abilities and academic departmental
socialization in relation to Holland’s RIASEC types was provided. The article concluded
with a description of possible academic advising and career counseling interventions
along with other applications that are based on Holland’s theory. A theory-based model
for academic advising and counseling was presented.
23
References
American College Testing, Inc. (ACT, 2003). DISCOVER (Windows) [Computer
software]. Iowa City, IA: Author.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education.
Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
Astin, A. W., & Holland, J. L. (1961). The Environmental Assessment Technique: A way
to measure college environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 308-316.
Borgen, F. (1991). Megatrends and milestones in vocational behavior: A 20-year
counseling psychology retrospective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 263-
290.
Brown, D. (2002). Introduction to theories of career development and choice. In D.
Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 3-23). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Bridges.com Co. (2003). Choices [Computer software]. Oroville, WA: Author.
Creamer, D. G. (2000). Use of theory in academic advising. In V. N. Gordon and W. R.
Habley (Eds.), Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 18-34). San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Day, S. X., & Rounds, J. B. (1998). Universality of vocational interest structure across
racial and ethnic minorities. American Psychologist, 53, 728-730.
Ender, S. C., Winston, Jr., R. B., & Miller, T. K. (1984). In R. B. Winston, Jr., T. K. Miller,
S. C. Ender, T. J. Grites, & Associates, Developmental academic advising:
Addressing students’ educational, career, and personal needs (p. 3-34). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gottfredson, G. D. (1999). John L. Holland’s contributions to vocational psychology: A
review and evaluation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 15-40.
24
Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1996) The dictionary of Holland occupational codes.
Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1991) The Position Classification Inventory:
Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment.
Journal of Career Assessment, 11, 115-135.
Gottfredson, L. S., & Richards, J. M. Jr. (1999). The meaning and measurement of
environments in Holland’s theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 57-73.
Higher Education Research Institute. (1986). Cooperative Institutional Research
Program codebook for 1980 freshman survey and 1990 follow-up survey. Los
Angeles, CA: Author.
Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice Hall.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and
work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Holland, J., Gottfredson, G., & Nafziger, D. (1975). Testing the validity of some
theoretical signs of vocational decision-making ability. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 22, 411-422.
Holland, J. L., Reardon, R. C., Latshaw, R. J., Rarick, S. R., Schneider, S., Shortridge, M.
A., & St. James, S. A. (2001). Self-Directed Search Form R Internet Version 2.0
[On-line]. Available: http://www.self-directed-search.com.
Jacoby, B., Rue, P., & Allen, K. (1984). UMaps: A person-environment approach to
helping students make critical choices. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 62, 426-
428.
Muchinsky, P. M. (1999). Application of Holland’s theory in industrial and organizational
settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 127-35.
25
Peterson, G. W., Lenz, J. G., & Sampson, J. P., Jr. (2003). The assessment of readiness
for student learning in college. In G. L. Kramer & associates. Student academic
services: An integrated approach (pp. 103-125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Reardon, R., & Lenz, J. (1999). Holland’s theory and career assessment. Journal of
Vocational Behavior (Special Issue), 55, 102-113.
Reardon, R., & Lenz, J. (1998). The Self-Directed Search and related Holland career
materials: A practitioner’s guide. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment
Resources, Inc.
Reardon, R. C., Lenz, J. G., & Strausberger, S. (1996). Integrating theory, practice, and
research with the Self-Directed Search (Form R). Measurement & Evaluation in
Counseling & Development, 28, 211-218.
Reardon, R. C., Sampson, J. P., Jr., & Lenz, J. G. (2000). Career assessment in a time
of changing roles, relationships, and contexts. Journal of Career Assessment, 8,
351-359.
Reardon, R. C., Vernick, S. H., & Reed, C. R. (in press). A Holland perspective on the
U.S. workforce from 1960 to 1990. Journal of Career Assessment.
Richards, J. M., Jr. (1973). A study of the “environments” of Japanese universities.
Research in Higher Education, 1, 87-99.
Richards, J. M., Jr. (1974). “Environments” of British Commonwealth universities.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 572-579.
Richards, J. M., Jr. (1987a). Psychosocial environments of Black colleges: A theory
based assessment. Population and Environment, 9, 41-53.
Richards, J. M., Jr. (1987b). The social ecology of U.S. law schools. Research in Higher
Education, 26, 389-400.
26
Rosen, R., Holmberg, K., & Holland, J. (1994). Educational opportunities finder. Odessa,
FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Sampson, J. P., Jr., Reardon, R. C., Peterson, G. W., & Lenz, J. G. (2004). Career
counseling and services: A cognitive information processing approach. Pacific
Grove, CA: Wadsworth-Brooks/Cole.
Sears, S. (1982). A definition of career guidance terms: A National Vocational Guidance
Association perspective. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 31, 137-143.
Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., & Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland's
theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt
University Press.
Tracey, T. J. G., & Darcy, M. (2002). An idiothetic examination of vocational interests
and their relation to career decidedness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49,
420-427.
27
Table 1
Summary of Holland Types
Type Examples of Occupations/Fields Typical Traits
Realistic computer engineering, forestry,
surveyor, poultry science, and
farmer
mechanical and athletic abilities,
likes to work outdoors and with
tools and machines, and might be
described as conforming, frank,
hardheaded, honest, humble,
materialistic, natural, normal,
persistent, practical, shy, and
thrifty
Investigative biology, chemist, physicist,
geologist, anthropologist,
laboratory assistant, and medical
technician
math and science abilities, and
likes to work alone and to solve
problems; might be described as
analytical, complex, critical,
curious, independent, intellectual,
introverted, pessimistic, precise,
and rational
Artistic composer, musician, stage
director, dancer, interior
decorator, actor, and writer
artistic skills, enjoys creating
original work, and has a good
imagination; may be described as
complicated, disorderly,
emotional, idealistic, imaginative,
impulsive, independent,
introspective, nonconforming,
and original
Social teacher, speech therapist,
religious worker, counselor,
clinical psychologist, and nurse
likes to help, teach, and counsel
people, and may be described as
cooperative, friendly, generous,
helpful, idealistic, kind,
responsible, sympathetic, tactful,
understanding, and warm
Enterprising buyer, sports promoter, television
producer, business executive,
salesperson, travel agent,
supervisor, and manager
leadership and public speaking
abilities, is interested in money
and politics, and likes to
influence people; described as
acquisitive, agreeable, ambitious,
attention getting, domineering,
energetic, extroverted, impulsive,
optimistic, self-confident, and
sociable
Conventional bookkeeper, financial analyst,
banker, tax expert, and medical
laboratory assistant
clerical and math abilities, likes
to work indoors and to organize
things; described as conforming,
careful, efficient, obedient,
orderly, persistent, practical,
thrifty, and unimaginative
28
Table 2
Academic Disciplines by Holland Types as Classified by Smart et al. (2000)
Type Academic Disciplines
Investigative Allied health/medical technologies, biology and life
sciences, economics, geography, math/statistics,
physical sciences, finance, aeronautical engineering,
civil engineering, chemical engineering, astronomy,
earth science, pharmacy, premedicine, predentistry,
preveteranian, anthropology, ethnic studies,
geography, and sociology
Artistic Architecture, fine arts (art, drama, music), foreign
languages, English, music, speech, theater, and
environmental design
Social Ethnic studies, home economics, humanities
(history, philosophy, religion, rhetoric), library
science, physical and health education, psychology,
social sciences (anthropology, political science,
social work), elementary education, special
education, nursing, and law enforcement
Enterprising Business, communications, computer/information
science, law, public affairs, journalism, marketing,
industrial engineering, and business education
Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., & Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland's theory and the
study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.