G@IT 2010:Agency and GTA Transition Alignment
“Establishing the new interoperability model”August 25, 2008
Georgia Technology Authority
2
Agenda
• Managing Change
• Service Levels
• Finance
• GTA Structure
Georgia Technology Authority
3
Why Are We Here?
• G@IT 2010 contract signing occurs in 52 days
• Transition of IT infrastructure to selected providers begins in October
Georgia Technology Authority
4
What Will Be Different?
• State will acquire services, not equipment
• GTA will manage delivery of services (What), not hardware and software (How)
• GTA manages service providers through:▪ Service levels▪ Governance through active management
• Processes will change − procurement, billing, budgeting
• Service delivery improved through processes
Georgia Technology Authority
5
Where We Are in the Process
Phase 1: Assessment ▪ Completed December 2007
Phase 2: Procurement▪ Managed Network Services: October 2008▪ Infrastructure Services: November 2008
• Phase 3: Transition▪ October 2008 – April 2009
• Phase 4: Transformation▪ Ongoing throughout life of the contract
Georgia Technology Authority
6
Why We Must Change
• All agencies face similar risks▪ Aging infrastructure
▪ Not meeting minimum standards
▪ Weak security and disaster recovery
• Assessment validated…▪ Good people but thinly staffed
▪ Absence of processes
▪ Little measurement
▪ Duplicate spend but critical initiatives are under funded
▪ Disaster recovery gaps
The capabilities within the state to fix the problem have deteriorated to such an extent that only an enterprise-wide initiative that draws services and skills from the market has the opportunity to make timely repairs.
TPI Sourcing Assessment, December 2007
Georgia Technology Authority
7
Why Start Process Work Now?
• Waiting until the start of transition to identify change requirements risks degrading sourcing program momentum
• Alerting agencies to change that will be required, while important, is insufficient for successful implementation of the sourcing program
• Coordinated process development essential for success
Georgia Technology Authority
8
Governance Key to Successful Transformation
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
Current Performance
Transition
Typical performance with unmanaged change
Intended performance with change
Change Implementation
Complete
Current Performance
Performance gap created
By unmanaged
change
Source: Technology Partners International, April 2008
Georgia Technology Authority
9
• GTA▪ Maintain the cornerstone (infrastructure) of your technology
through the diligent management of the providers ▪ Provide and drive the forums and decisions (governance)
necessary to align the providers to agency needs
• Agency▪ Business systems (software) you use to run your business
▪ Processes and methods you use to define, prioritize, communicate and manage your (business − technology) workload
Responsibilities
Georgia Technology Authority
10
SMO Disciplines Are Built on Process
• Financial analysis and planning
• Contract change management• Contract issue management
• Contract pricing adjustments
• Governance• Forecasting and demand
management • Regulatory and tax compliance• Workplace services• Customer satisfaction survey
management • Communications management• Project spend pool management
• Performance analysis and serviceand delivery management
• Service requests, authorization• Security, architecture and standards
management • Risk management• Asset management• Incident, problem, escalation,
change management
• Contract administration
• Dispute resolution• Service provider audit• Governance library
• Invoice management.• Performance credits,
earnbacks and criticalmilestones
• Procurement
• Value leakage mitigation• Chargeback
Relationship Management
Performance Management
FinancialManagement
ContractAdministration
Right work, done right Validate and manage costs
Satisfaction, direction setting Ensure compliance
Strategy & Objectives
Perspective on Governance includes
both state- and provider-facing
activities
Georgia Technology Authority
11
• Links agencies, provider and GTA together
• Increases the stability and reliability of the state’s infrastructure
• Enables variable capacity and capability
• Reduces risks through increased visibility
• Ensures the state’s security and disaster recovery profiles improve
• Helps quantify operational impacts…▪ Of your decisions and state mandates
▪ For accelerating and delaying projects
These Processes Have Benefits
Georgia Technology Authority
12
What Will GTA Do to Help You Get Ready?
• Establish enterprise standards ▪ We all have to eat the same cooking
• Lead an “Interoperability Project”▪ Evaluate top 3 integration points
▪ Recommend approach for agencies to prepare
▪ Offer process templates
▪ Suggest GTA support models
• Train▪ Technology management through service levels
▪ Forecasting and demand management
▪ Process orientation
Georgia Technology Authority
13
• Rate and speed of adoption
• Resistance
• Staff skills and proficiency
• Governance
Recognize that Georgia’s success will be defined by how well we manage change together:
Georgia Technology Authority
14
• Service levels are expressions of your expectations▪ State and provider agree to service levels and quality▪ They measure the service provider’s actual performance
• Your bills will be based on your consumption ▪ Provider sets base charge tied to specific service volumes▪ Volumes can be increased or decreased
• GTA will change to enable this transformation ▪ GTA’s new structure provides a disciplined approach to
managing service providers▪ State has adopted an international standard called ITIL▪ GTA will assist agencies in preparing key processes to link
into the provider
Three Concepts
Service Level Agreements (SLA) are expressions of your
expectations1. What’s Different About Our SLA's
2. We Want Performance − Not Money
3. Examples of Service Levels
4. We Have Flexibility in Our Metrics
5. Service Levels Are Not Penalties
Georgia Technology Authority
16
What’s Different About Our SLA’s?
• G@IT 2010 SLA’s will have financial implications
• They are built to influence behavior
• They have more options than voiding the contract
• They allow us to change our focus
• We don’t want the money
Georgia Technology Authority
17
• State will receive performance credits from the supplier for not providing the contracted (“expected”) service
• Supplier can earn back performance credits each year
• Key concepts▪ Expected Service Level
• Constantly missing these will cost the provider
▪ Minimum Service Level Default• Don’t make the big mistake; it will cost the provider
▪ Annual Earnback• Allowing them to earn back penalties changes behavior
We Want Performance − Not Money
Georgia Technology Authority
18
• System availability ▪ System up time ▪ System response time
• Problem management▪ Problem response time ▪ Problem resolution time
• Customer satisfaction▪ Transactions completed without complaint
• Helpdesk▪ Number of calls resolved on first call▪ Number of abandoned calls
Examples of Service Levels
Georgia Technology Authority
19
All CriticalMetrics SLA • 5• 4• 4• 3• 5• 5• 5• 4• 1• ==• 36 avg. is 4.0
• 5
• 3
• 5• 4• 1• ==• 18 avg. is 3.0
Agencies can influence these through participation in governance meetings
We have the right to select and
change which metrics we
want to elevate
By focusing on a limited number of metrics we
can get attention to weak areas
Using all metrics to manage the provider can obscure the
errors
Flexible Measure to Adjust
Georgia Technology Authority
20
• SLA’s were written to allow the provider to earn back penalties if:▪ They avoid future failures ▪ They can demonstrate it wasn’t their mistake ▪ They are willing to make investments that would lead to an
acceptable and sustained performance
• SLA’s are written to notice one-time events but only penalize for inconsistent delivery▪ Failures require more than just one clean month to resolve▪ A scorecard is maintained throughout the year
Service Levels Are Not Penalties
Your bills will be based on your consumption
1. GTA Coordination With OPB
2. What Is An RU (ARC/RRC)?
3. Need to Manage Your Consumption
4. What Level of Detail Is Available
Georgia Technology Authority
22
• GTA worked with OPB and agency budget directors… To calculate FY 2009 budget amendments for the “stub
period” (March – June 2009)
• Using agency base case data… GTA and OPB calculated amounts for FY 09 and FY 10 to be
“held harmless” from the 6%, 8% and 10% budget reductions
• Both of the above used base case data because vendor pricing was not available at the time “Stub period” was an estimated time frame Actual implementation could be a bit earlier or later depending
on negotiation with the vendors
IT Budgeting For FY 09 and FY 10:What’s Been Done
Georgia Technology Authority
23
IT Budgeting for FY 09 and FY 10:“To Do” List
• When contracts are signed in October and November:
▪ Work with each agency and OPB to evaluate needs/demand for services and compare against each agency’s level of funding
▪ Determine which agencies need additional funding and which need less
▪ Evaluate fund source impact
▪ Reallocate funds between agencies (OPB function) and reflect in the AFY 09 and FY 10 Governor’s Recommended Budget
Georgia Technology Authority
24
• Virtually unlimited capacity▪ Service provider will supply and charge for as many resource units as
you can consume▪ Validation of invoices for accuracy is a must▪ Agencies should always be conscious of consumption trends
• Project activity▪ Provider resources have a lower price if you can prioritize within the
capacity of the contract▪ Little projects (Little “p”) are projects that can be accomplished with the
same type and capacity of resources we have today and the cost is included
▪ Big Projects (Big “P”) are projects that expand beyond our current capacity and require the vendor to add resources
▪ Better planning can lower cost ▪ Disaster Recovery and Security will now be required to be priced into
new projects
Need to Manage Your Consumption
Georgia Technology Authority
25
• WAN▪ Site connection to the state network (WAN site)
• 3 tiers based on site attributes▪ Use of the connection (Transport)
• LAN▪ Maintenance of a person’s connection to the Local Area Network (LAN)▪ Wireless access point ▪ Move, add and change of a connection (IMAC)
• Voice▪ Upcharge per call center seat▪ Interactive Voice Response (IVR) per user ▪ Changes to phone setups (IMAC)
• Per user: includes maintenance, hardware and carrier▪ Video conference per room and call
Example of Network/Voice Resource Units
Georgia Technology Authority
26
• IBM ▪ Application CPU hour
▪ Automated application tape storage GBs
▪ Manual application tape mounts
• Unisys▪ Standard units of processing (SUPs)
▪ Application tapes in storage (active rotation)
• IBM and Unisys▪ Allocated disk space (DASD)
▪ Application tapes in storage
• Print (standard and custom)▪ Mainframe output print images
Examples of Mainframe Resource Units
Georgia Technology Authority
27
• Defined as business applications, middleware, database or web
• Priced per operating system instance▪ By operating system type (Windows or UNIX)
▪ By complexity
• Hardware and hardware maintenance priced via a separate monthly hardware charge
• Application utility software priced via separate monthly software charge▪ Compilers, database, development tools, middleware, etc.
Examples of Application ServersResource Units
Georgia Technology Authority
28
• Defined as e-mail, file/print, enterprise gateways, presentation and terminal
• Resource units▪ E-mail accounts▪ LAN-attached devices
• Application utility software priced via separate monthly software charge
• Infrastructure servers are not a separate resource unit and are not priced discretely▪ Domain services, enterprise security, enterprise backup,
enterprise scheduling and software distribution
Examples of Utility ServersResource Units
Georgia Technology Authority
29
• Server storage▪ Enterprise storage vs. local storage
▪ Replication and backup
• End-user computing▪ By device type
▪ By central/remote location
▪ Requesting service provider best practice: Premium service and non-standards devices
• Service desk▪ Authorized user
Example of Infrastructure Resource Units
Georgia Technology Authority
30
BaselineBaseline
Base Charge covers theResource Baseline2,500
0
2,000
Year 1 Year 5
Each Resource addition over the Baseline is charged as an Additional Resource
Charge (ARCs)
Each Resource removed under the Baseline is credited as a Reduced
Resource Credit (RRCs)
Resource
UnIt
Volume
ARC
RRCAbove and below
theResource
Thresholdspricing rates will be renegotiated within defined
parameters
ThresholdsThresholdsProtection For Reduced Volume•No minimum commitments•Extraordinary events•Full and Partial Termination Rights•Benchmarking with automatic adjustment
Competitive Pricing Of Additional Volume•No exclusivity•Extraordinary events•Benchmarking with automatic adjustment
1,500
What Is An ARC and RRC?(Variable Pricing and Terminology)
GTA will change to enable this transformation
1. How Will GTA Change? Operations Becomes SMO
2. What is ITIL? New Standard
3. GTA to Help Agencies Link Into the Providers
4. Change From the Agency Seat
5. What Happens Next
Georgia Technology Authority
32
New GTA OrganizationWill Provide the Governance
To enable this new Relationship
Service Provider
Agency
AgencyIT Staff
ServiceDesk
GTA Tech SME
We will retain a few high end technical
experts
GTA:- Contracts- Finance- Governance- Escalation
We will actively manage
the contract
We will have a consultant
assigned to your agency
GTA Delivery Consultant
How Does This All Fit Together?
Georgia Technology Authority
33
Statewide layer (Enterprise)▪ Budgeting and finance ▪ Enterprise technology
• IT strategic planning
• IT policies, standards and guidelines
• IT project assurance
▪ Information security
Service Management Organization (Operations)▪ Managing a collection of providers ▪ Accountable for the delivery of services
Components of GTA’s New Structure
Georgia Technology Authority
34
Service Management Organization
An organization set up to manage the relationship and services of GTA’s external and internal service providers
The SMO is established as a single point of accountability within an organization for the effective management of the providers
Replaces GTA’s existing Operations
What is an SMO?
Georgia Technology Authority
35
VMO: Vendor Management Organization Weak strategy and planningVMO: Vendor Management Organization Weak strategy and planning
SDO: Service Delivery OrganizationDamaged relationships between firmsSDO: Service Delivery OrganizationDamaged relationships between firms
52%37%
11%
GTA has created new organizations that align to resolve typical sourcing issues
ASO: Administrative Service Organization Inadequate legal and financial terms and conditionsASO: Administrative Service Organization Inadequate legal and financial terms and conditions
Typical Industry Problems and GTA’s Solutions
Georgia Technology Authority
36
What is the ITIL Standard?
ITIL (IT Infrastructure Library) provides a framework of best practice guidance for IT service management
ITIL has grown to become the most widely accepted approach to IT service management in the world: www.itil-officialsite.com
This standard drives processes that control cost and drive stability into the infrastructure
ITIL is the objective standard that we will require of our providers and our processes
Georgia Technology Authority
37
GTA has launched an “Interoperability Project” with the following deliverables:▪ Identify and coordinate linkages between agencies
and GTA’s Service Management Organization
▪ Provide agency interoperability roadmaps
Project will focus on the following key process areas:▪ Service request management
▪ Change management
▪ Demand and forecast management
Interoperability Project to Reduce Confusion
Georgia Technology Authority
38
Project start-up: Aug. 11– 14
Review, assemble interoperability profiles: Aug. 15 – 20
• Interview agency leads, validate profiles: Aug. 21 – Sept. 12
• Define linkages between agencies and SMO: Sept. 13 – 19
• Develop, deliver agency roadmaps Sept. 20 – Oct. 3
Interoperability Project Timeline
Georgia Technology Authority
39
What Happens Next…
• Communicate, communicate, communicate
• Agencies make GAIT 2010 transition a top 5 project
• Providers come in for due diligence
• GTA runs Interoperability Project
• Agency agreements are coming
• We will schedule another meeting
Georgia Technology Authority
40
Governance Key to Successful Transformation
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
Current Performance
Transition
Typical performance with unmanaged change
Intended performance with change
Change Implementation
Complete
Current Performance
Performance gap created
By unmanaged
change
Source: Technology Partners International, April 2008
Georgia Technology Authority
41
Questions
ProcessesProcesses are the foundations for consistency
Service levelsService levels are the expression of requirements
MetricsMetrics are the transparency of performance