Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 1
The NOA Experiment
P5 Meeting
SLAC
21 February 2008
Gary Feldman
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 2
What is NOA? NOA is a second-generation experiment on the NuMI
beamline, which is optimized for the detection of e oscillations. It will give an order of magnitude improvement over MINOS
in measurements of e appearance and disappearance. NOA is a “totally active” tracking liquid scintillator
calorimeter, sited off-axis to take advantage of a narrow-band beam.
The NOA project also includes accelerator upgrades to bring the beam power from 400 kW to 700 kW.
NOA’s unique feature is its long baseline, which gives it sensitivity to the neutrino mass ordering.
NOA is complementary to both T2K and Daya Bay.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 3
NOA SiteAsh River
Minneapolis
Duluth
International Falls
Fermilab
Ash River
Minneapolis
Duluth
International Falls
FermilabAsh River
VoyageursNational Park(shaded brown)
Ash River
VoyageursNational Park(shaded brown)
The Ash River site is the furthestavailable site from Fermilab alongthe NuMI beamline. This maximizesNOA’s sensitivity to the mass ordering.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 4
NOA Basic Detector Element Liquid scintillator in a 4 cm wide, 6 cm deep, 15.7 m long, highly reflective PVC cell.
Light is collected in a U-shaped 0.7 mm wavelength-shifting fiber, both ends of which terminate in a pixel of a 32-pixel avalanche photodiode (APD).
The APD has peak quantum efficiency of 85%. It will be run at a gain of 100. It must be cooled to -15oC and requires a very low noise amplifier.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 5
Far Detector
There are 1003 planes, for a total mass of 15 kT. There is enough room in the building for 18 kT, which can be built if we can preserve half of our contingency. The detector can start taking data as soon as blocks are filled and the electronics connected.
An admirer
The cells are made from 32-cell extrusions.
12 extrusion modules make up a plane. The planes alternate horizontal and vertical.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 6
NOA Timeline May 2002 1st Workshop Jun 2002 Letter of Intent Mar 2004 Proposal to the Fermilab PAC Mar 2005 Revised Proposal to the PAC Apr 2005 Fermilab Stage 1 Approval Nov 2005 CD-0 Granted Feb 2006 Recommended by NuSAG Oct 2006 Recommended by P5 May 2007 CD-1 Granted Oct 2007 Passed CD-2/3a Review May 2008 CD-2/3a Granted Nov 2008 CD-3b Granted Apr 2009 Start of Construction Jun 2011 Far Detector Building Beneficial Occupancy Aug 2012 1st 2.5 kT of the Far Detector Online Jan 2014 Full Far Detector Online
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 7
Funding Profiles
With this profile, we could advance the schedule by 10 months.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 8
Reactor vs. Accelerator
Peter explained the physics of neutrino oscillations well, so I need not repeat it. However, I would like to expand on a couple of points.
Reactor and accelerator experiments do not measure the same thing. Reactors are sensitive to sin2(213), while accelerators are sensitive to sin2(23) sin2(213). If 23 ≠ /4, these quantities can be quite different.
The good news is that a comparison of NOA and Daya Bay can break this ambiguity and determine whether 3 couples more to or .
2 sin2(23) .vs sin2(223)
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00
sin2(223)
2sin
2 (23)
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 9
95% CL Resolution of the 23 Ambiguity
The ambiguity canbe resolved in the region below and to the right of the curves.
The sensitivity depends on themass ordering, , and the sign of theambiguity itself. The curves repre-sent an average over these parameters.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 10
Measurement of sin2(223)
This calculationuses NOA’s excellent energyresolution on
CC events.
It is a parameterized calculation, which needs to be redone witha full reconstruction.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 11
Sensitivity to sin2(213) ≠ 0
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 12
Parameters Consistent with a 2% e
Oscillation Probability
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 13
Strategy for Determining the Mass Ordering
If the CP-violating term goes in the same direction as the matter effect, then there is no ambiguity and NOA can determine the mass ordering by itself, given sufficient integrated beam.
If the CP-violating term goes in the opposite direction as the matter effect, then there is an inherent ambiguity and NOA cannot determine the mass ordering by itself. But it can be determined, in principle, by comparing NOA and T2K. If the neutrino oscillation probability is larger in NOA than
in T2K, it is the normal mass ordering; if the opposite, it is the inverted mass ordering.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 14
95% CL Resolution of the Mass OrderingNOA Alone
Normal Ordering Inverted Ordering
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 15
Combining Data with T2K
When it is useful to combine data with T2K, I will assume that T2K will only run a neutrino beam because This is what they have proposed to do. They have less incentive to run antineutrinos since
They have too short a baseline to get information on the mass ordering.
The antineutrino rates at T2K energies are relatively somewhat lower than at NOA energies.
The complementarity between the two experiments is better statistically if T2K runs only neutrinos since it consists of comparing like runs — neutrinos to neutrinos or antineutrinos to antineutrinos.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 16
95% CL Resolution of the Mass OrderingNOA Plus T2K
Normal Ordering Inverted Ordering
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 17
vs. 13 Contours: Best Possible
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 18
vs. 13 Contours: Worst Possible T2K and NOA Alone
Profiles,not limits
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 19
vs. 13 Contours: Worst Possible T2K and NOA Combined
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 20
Conclusions I
Due to its long baseline and ease of running antineutrinos, NOA will produce important results unavailable from any other experiment in its time frame.
It is complementary to both T2K and Daya Bay. What was to become NOA had its first workshop in May
2002. It has now passed all of its reviews and is ready to start construction in the spring of 2009, assuming funding will be available. All of the other major US neutrino accelerator initiatives being discussed today are in the workshop phase.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 21
Conclusions II
NOA will be the anchor of the US accelerator neutrino program. In addition to its unique physics contributions, It will provide the incentive to increase the NuMI beam
power from 400 to 700 kW, and then to either 1.2 MW (SNuMI) or 2.3 MW (Project X), depending on available funding.
It will provide a base detector, allowing the necessary liquid argon prototype, LAr5, to double the capacity of NuMI program.
It will provide the continuity necessary to keep the program running smoothly, e.g. training experimental and accelerator physicists.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 22
Backup Slides
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 23
What NOA Can Do If …
sin2(213) 0.1 Determine the mass ordering for half of the
space at the 1-3 level; combining with T2K, determine the mass ordering for the other half of the range at 1-2 level.
Exclude about half of the space at the 1-2 level.
Combining with Daya Bay, determine whether 3 couples more strongly to or at the 2 level if sin2(223) < 0.97.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 24
What NOA Can Do If …
sin2(213) 0.06 Determine the mass ordering for half of the
space at the 1-2 level; combining with T2K, determine the mass ordering for the other half of the range at 1-2 level.
Exclude about half of the space at the 1-2 level.
Combining with Daya Bay, determine whether 3 couples more strongly to or at the 2 level if sin2(223) < 0.94.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 25
What NOA Can Do If …
sin2(213) 0.03 Determine the mass ordering for a quarter of the
space at the 1 level. Exclude about half of the space at the 1-2
level.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 26
What NOA Can Do If …
sin2(213) 0.01 See a signal at the 1-3 level, confirming weak
signals seen in other experiments.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 27
What We Know and What We Don’t Know
Don’t know
Know to someextent
O. Mena and S. Parke, hep-ph/0312131
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 28
NOA Near Detector
4.1 m
2.9 m
14.4 m
Veto region
Target region
Shower containment region
Muon catcher1 m iron
209 T126 T totally active23 T fiducial
The Near Detector will beplaced in a cavern off of the MINOS access tunnel on the same off axis line as the fardetector.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 29
Event Quality
Longitudinal sampling is 0.15 X0, which gives excellent -e separation.
A 2-GeV muon is 60 planes long.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 30
e CC event
epe-p+
E=2.5GeV
Ee=1.9GeV
Ep=1.1GeV
E=0.2GeV
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 31
Background NC event
Npo
E=10.6 GeV
Ep=1.04GeV
Eo =1.97GeV