Transcript
Page 1: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

11

Faculty Faculty Progressive DialoguesProgressive Dialogues

Monday, September 10, 2007Monday, September 10, 20073:00-4:30 pm3:00-4:30 pm

Thursday, September 13, 2007Thursday, September 13, 20078:30-10:00 am8:30-10:00 am

Page 2: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

22

What is Your Vision What is Your Vision for USF Sarasota-for USF Sarasota-

Manatee?Manatee?

Page 3: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

Vision StatementVision StatementThe University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee is an The University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee is an

indispensable asset in economic and human resource indispensable asset in economic and human resource development and a source of pride for all residents. development and a source of pride for all residents.

We have a vision to:1. Develop centers of excellence that focus on the distinguishing

characteristics of our high-quality program offerings. 2. Be widely recognized in the South Tampa Bay region as the

premier source of quality programs for intellectual growth, meaningful research results and an array of educational opportunities.

3. Focus on students, creating a home campus environment in a “university town” atmosphere, conducive to social, cultural and leadership development as well as intellectual growth.

4. Align educational programs with the community's business, economic and workforce needs.

5. Create an organizational culture that represents pre-eminent service quality.

Page 4: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

44

What is Our Competition?What is Our Competition?

Page 5: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

55

Ten Schools in Ten Schools in AnalysisAnalysis

Argosy UniversityArgosy UniversityEckerd CollegeEckerd CollegeEverglades UniversityEverglades UniversityFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityHodges UniversityHodges UniversityKeiser UniversityKeiser UniversitySt. Petersburg CollegeSt. Petersburg CollegeUniversity of PhoenixUniversity of PhoenixUniversity of TampaUniversity of TampaWebster UniversityWebster University

Page 6: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

66

Their Competitive Their Competitive AdvantagesAdvantages

1.1. EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING CREDITCREDIT

EckerdEckerd – external evaluation & portfolio – external evaluation & portfolio

Florida Gulf CoastFlorida Gulf Coast – Criminal Justice & in other – Criminal Justice & in other areas through credit-by-examareas through credit-by-exam

HodgesHodges – portfolio– portfolio

St. Petersburg CollegeSt. Petersburg College – written/oral exams, – written/oral exams, portfolio, interview assessment, project/product portfolio, interview assessment, project/product evaluationevaluation

Phoenix Phoenix – portfolio & essay– portfolio & essay

KeiserKeiser – Does not offer experiential learning – Does not offer experiential learning credit, but does consider credit taken at a non-credit, but does consider credit taken at a non-accredited school on a course-by-course basis.accredited school on a course-by-course basis.

Page 7: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

77

Their Competitive AdvantagesTheir Competitive Advantages2.2. ON-LINE DEGREESON-LINE DEGREES

Argosy Argosy Bachelor’s in psychologyBachelor’s in psychologyMaster’s: MBA & educational/instructional leadershipMaster’s: MBA & educational/instructional leadership

EvergladesEvergladesBachelor’s: business admin, applied management, alternative medicine, aviation Bachelor’s: business admin, applied management, alternative medicine, aviation tech/mgt, construction mgt, professional aviation.tech/mgt, construction mgt, professional aviation.Master’s: business admin, aviation scienceMaster’s: business admin, aviation science

Florida Gulf CoastFlorida Gulf CoastBachelor’s (upper division): criminal justice, health sciences, legal studies, nursingBachelor’s (upper division): criminal justice, health sciences, legal studies, nursingMaster’s: MBA, MPA, health science, geriatric recreational therapy, curriculum & Master’s: MBA, MPA, health science, geriatric recreational therapy, curriculum & instruction with concentration in educational techinstruction with concentration in educational techOther for K-12 Teachers: ESOL, Reading EndorsementOther for K-12 Teachers: ESOL, Reading Endorsement

HodgesHodgesBachelor’s: interdisciplinary studies, paralegal studies, health informationBachelor’s: interdisciplinary studies, paralegal studies, health informationMaster’s: criminal justice, information systems mgt, management & public Master’s: criminal justice, information systems mgt, management & public administrationadministration

KeiserKeiserBachelor’s: all programs they offer, including accounting, except elementary Bachelor’s: all programs they offer, including accounting, except elementary educationeducation

St. Petersburg CollegeSt. Petersburg CollegeBachelor’s of Applied Science in: banking, dental hygiene, international business, Bachelor’s of Applied Science in: banking, dental hygiene, international business, nursing, public safety administration, technology mgt, veterinary technologynursing, public safety administration, technology mgt, veterinary technology

PhoenixPhoenixAll offered, except master’s of arts in educationAll offered, except master’s of arts in education

Page 8: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

88

Their Competitive Their Competitive AdvantagesAdvantages

3.3. DEGREE OFFERINGSDEGREE OFFERINGS• Areas we have chosen not to Areas we have chosen not to

offerofferScienceScienceHealth careHealth careFine arts (Art, Music, Theater)Fine arts (Art, Music, Theater)

• Areas for considerationAreas for considerationBankingBankingCommunicationCommunicationConstruction managementConstruction managementGerontologyGerontologySecondary Education: English, math, social Secondary Education: English, math, social studiesstudiesSpanishSpanishSports managementSports management

Page 9: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

99

Florida Gulf Coast Florida Gulf Coast UniversityUniversity**

On-Line ProgramsOn-Line ProgramsCriminal JusticeCriminal Justice

NursingNursing

MBAMBA

Reading Endorsement for K-12 TeachersReading Endorsement for K-12 Teachers

ESOL for K-12 TeachersESOL for K-12 Teachers

Experiential Learning CreditExperiential Learning CreditB.S. in Criminal JusticeB.S. in Criminal Justice

Other courses by taking oral, written, or Other courses by taking oral, written, or practical examinations.practical examinations.

*8% of our incoming students considered attending FGCU

Page 10: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1010

Face-to-Face Degree Face-to-Face Degree ProgramsPrograms

42

12 118

57

39 11

33

61

3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

USF S

-M

Argos

y U

Ecke

rd C

olle

ge (PEL

)

Ever

glad

es U

FGCU

Hod

ges U @

MTI

Keise

r U SPC

Phoe

nix

U of T

ampa

Web

ster

U

Page 11: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1111

0

4

0

8 97 7 8

28

0

7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

USF S

-M

Argos

y U

Ecke

rd C

olle

ge (PEL

)

Ever

glad

es U

FGCU

Hod

ges U @

MTI

Keise

r U SPC

Phoe

nix

U of T

ampa

Web

ster

U

On-line Degree ProgramsOn-line Degree Programs

Page 12: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1212

Our Competitive Our Competitive AdvantagesAdvantages**

1.1. Accreditation Accreditation 2.2. Adult Learner ProgramAdult Learner Program3.3. Cost & Financial AidCost & Financial Aid4.4. Faculty QualityFaculty Quality5.5. Hybrid CoursesHybrid Courses6.6. Resources of Larger SystemResources of Larger System7.7. RetentionRetention

*That our competitors claim as their own!

Page 13: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1313

$96

$425

$250

$390

$116

$405$459

$77

$360

$420

$490

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

USF S

-M

Argos

y U

Ecke

rd C

olle

ge (PEL

)

Ever

glad

es U

FGCU

Hod

ges U @

MTI

Keise

r U SPC

Phoe

nix

U of T

ampa

Web

ster

U

Tuition Costs Per Credit HourTuition Costs Per Credit HourUndergraduateUndergraduate

Page 14: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1414

Tuition Costs Per Credit Tuition Costs Per Credit HourHour

$236

$525

$390

$228

$405$443 $450

$490

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

GraduateGraduate

Page 15: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1515

Undergraduate Retention Undergraduate Retention RateRate

78% 81% 84% 82%74%

32%

45%

77%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Source: NCES College Opportunities Online Locator

Page 16: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1616

Where Do Our Students Where Do Our Students Live?Live?

Page 17: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1717

Fall 2006

Page 18: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1818

How Are We Growing?How Are We Growing?

Page 19: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

1919

Fall Enrollment: Fall Enrollment: Student Credit Hours (SCH)Student Credit Hours (SCH)

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

Fall 2006 12,492 2,091

Fall 2007 14,787 1,854

Undergraduate Graduate

+18%

-11%

Page 20: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2020

Resident Faculty GrowthResident Faculty Growth

1622

4652

66

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2001 2002 2005 2006 2007

Page 21: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2121

Complete ProgramsComplete Programs

1923

3739 42

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2001 2002 2005 2006 2007

Page 22: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2222

What Do Our Students What Do Our Students Want?Want?

Page 23: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2323

94% undergraduates responded (n=375)94% undergraduates responded (n=375)YoungerYounger students tend to prefer students tend to prefer morningmorning classesclasses

OlderOlder students tend to prefer students tend to prefer eveningevening classes classes

2 types of undergraduates to serve now2 types of undergraduates to serve nowYounger students represent our opportunity for Younger students represent our opportunity for growthgrowth

We have classroom availability in the We have classroom availability in the morning. morning. Younger students more likely to be Younger students more likely to be full-timefull-time students. students. Younger students more likely to be working Younger students more likely to be working part-time.part-time.

Fall 2007 New Student Fall 2007 New Student QuestionnaireQuestionnaire

Page 24: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2424

TIME-OF-DAY PREFERENCE*TIME-OF-DAY PREFERENCE*

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

% of Students 38% 30% 41% 13%

Morning Afternoon EveningNo

Preference

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ONLY-ALL AGES. Could choose more than one time.

*From Fall 2007 New Student Questionnaire administered at Orientations.

Page 25: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2525

TIME-OF-DAY PREFERENCE*TIME-OF-DAY PREFERENCE*by College/Schoolby College/School

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Morning 40% 36% 38% 50%

Afternoon 36% 25% 27% 19%

Evening 46% 42% 49% 19%

No Preference 6% 15% 13% 31%

CAS (n=108) COB (n=92) COE (n=79) SHRM (n=10)

*From Fall 2007 New Student Questionnaire administered at Orientations.

Page 26: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2626

TIME OF DAY PREFERENCE*TIME OF DAY PREFERENCE*

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Morning 45% 41% 30% 27% 33% 33%

Afternoon 39% 34% 29% 21% 13% 33%

Evening 24% 34% 49% 64% 57% 61%

No Preference 14% 19% 15% 10% 13% 5%

Under 21 (n=51)

21-24 (n=143)

25-29 (n=79)

30-39 (n=73)

40-49 (n=46)

50-59 (n=18)

by Age Range

12 students did not specify their age.

Under 25 Morning Preferred

25+ Evening Preferred, but Morning an option for 27-33%.

Page 27: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2727

““Red HotRed Hot” & “” & “Ice BlueIce Blue” MCC Class Times ” MCC Class Times Percentage of Headcount Enrolled in Courses - Fall 2005Percentage of Headcount Enrolled in Courses - Fall 2005

MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri

7:00 AM7:00 AM 4% 5% 6% 5% 4%

8:00 AM8:00 AM 13% 16% 13% 17% 12%

9:00 AM 25% 28% 25% 28% 22%

10:00 AM 24% 4% 26% 4% 24%

11:00 AM 22% 24% 21% 24% 19%

12:00 PM 21% 21% 21% 21% 17%

1:00 PM1:00 PM 11% 2% 11% 3% 7%

2:00 PM2:00 PM 7% 9% 6% 8% 2%

3:00 PM3:00 PM 1% 1% 2% 1% 1%

4:00 PM4:00 PM 2% 1% 2% 2% 1%

5:00 PM5:00 PM 12% 15% 11% 15% 0%

6:00 PM6:00 PM 5% 3% 5% 3% 1%

7:00 PM7:00 PM 11% 13% 11% 12% 0%

8:00 PM8:00 PM 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Source: Source: MCC FactbookMCC Factbook, 2005-06, 2005-06 N=8908N=8908

Page 28: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2828

Manatee Community College: Manatee Community College: Our Main FeederOur Main Feeder

Fall 2007: Fall 2007: 75%75% of our new students of our new students previously attended MCCpreviously attended MCC

MCC’s MCC’s MOSTMOST popular class time is popular class time is morningmorning..

MCC’s MCC’s LEASTLEAST popular class time is popular class time is eveningevening..

Page 29: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

2929

When Did We Provide When Did We Provide Classes & How Did Our Classes & How Did Our

Students Respond?Students Respond?

Page 30: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

3030

Fall 2006 to Fall 2007 ComparisonFall 2006 to Fall 2007 ComparisonNumber of Courses vs. SCHNumber of Courses vs. SCH

We had We had fewer morning classesfewer morning classes in Fall in Fall 2007 but 2007 but enrollments were higherenrollments were higher..

We had We had more evening classesmore evening classes and and enrollments were higherenrollments were higher. .

We had We had more afternoon classesmore afternoon classes but but enrollments were about the sameenrollments were about the same..

Page 31: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

3131

USF Sarasota-Manatee USF Sarasota-Manatee Number of Courses by Time-of-Number of Courses by Time-of-

Day*Day*

*Undergraduate courses only.

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 33 62 85

2007 31 65 95

Morning Afternoon Evening

-6%

+12%

+5%

Page 32: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

3232

USF Sarasota-Manatee USF Sarasota-Manatee SCH Earned by Time-of-Day*SCH Earned by Time-of-Day*

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2006 1706 3223 4535

2007 1829 3234 5387

Morning Afternoon Evening

*Undergraduate courses only.

+7%

+<1%

+19%

Page 33: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

3333

FY08 BUDGETFY08 BUDGET

Page 34: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

3434

Process of Process of Strategic ImplementationStrategic Implementation

USF S-M Strategic PlanUSF S-M Strategic Plan 2006-112006-11 http://www.sarasota.usf.edu/ir/Strategic_Plan/Goals.htmhttp://www.sarasota.usf.edu/ir/Strategic_Plan/Goals.htm

USF Strategic PlanUSF Strategic Plan 2007-12 2007-12 http://www.ods.usf.edu/Plans/Strategic/goals-strategies.htmhttp://www.ods.usf.edu/Plans/Strategic/goals-strategies.htm

USF S-M Alignment & ImplementationUSF S-M Alignment & Implementation2007-082007-08

http://www.sarasota.usf.edu/ir/Strategic_Plan/Update_2007-08.htmhttp://www.sarasota.usf.edu/ir/Strategic_Plan/Update_2007-08.htm

Page 35: Faculty  Progressive Dialogues

3535

Progressive DialoguesProgressive Dialogues

FACULTY ISSUESFACULTY ISSUESGoal 1: Learner-Centered CampusGoal 1: Learner-Centered Campus

Faculty Professional Development & WorkloadFaculty Professional Development & Workload

Goal 2: Learning TechnologyGoal 2: Learning TechnologyDistance Learning BoardDistance Learning Board

Goal 3: Niche Programming & Program GrowthGoal 3: Niche Programming & Program GrowthAcademic ProgramsAcademic Programs

Goal 6: Assessing & Developing the Standards for Goal 6: Assessing & Developing the Standards for Enhanced Campus Autonomy That Could Enhanced Campus Autonomy That Could Support Criteria for Campus AccreditationSupport Criteria for Campus Accreditation

Campus-Wide AssessmentCampus-Wide Assessment