Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013
Models of Joint Action Plans(Art 95 CPR)
2nd meeting
2
Purpose of the presentation
• Present the main changes / "no changes" in the model of implementing act setting out a model of format for the Joint Action Plan
Model for a format of Joint Action Plan
• Comments & proposals sent by 5 MSs (CZ, EE, HU, LT, PL)
• - Most of them taken into account … with the exception of audit of public procurement
• - clarifications in the Q&A
Guidance part• - mainly wording issues• - details added on information of the COM on future JAPs (3
months / informal)• - bodies implementing the JAP• - approval of the JAP application by MA(s)• - date of submission of JAPs• - more details on intervention logic • - explanation of financial flexibility• - audit of public procurement: procedures but not the
invoices• - eligible advances• - clarification on the criteria to assess amendment of a JAP
and on the procedure
B – Contact details
• -> Reference to MAs approval
C- Analysis of development needs and objectives
• - better complementarity between C3 ("IP/SO supported by the JAP) and C4 (how the JAP will contribute to the SO of the IP)
• - Addition of a table on contribution to the performance framework
D – Framework of the JAP• - definition of projects / types of projects (sets of
similar activities with the same indicators)• - mitigation measures against impact of external
factors?• - details added on the representation of the
intervention logic
E- Geographic coverage and target group(s)
• - formal improvements
F- Expected implementation period
• - deletion of detail of successive steps
H- Implementing provisions
• - Info on key partners (where appropriate)• - clarifications on administrative and financial
management capacity, on information on financial corrections (10 yrs, >10 kEUR)
• - deletion of the arrangements of the beneficiary to steer the JAP (overlap)
J- Financial arrangements (1)
• - financial flexibility: more detailed + new box• - euro conversion• - financial tables simplified (€ for financing plan)
Annex on indicators used to reimburse the outputs and results
• - formal changes•
Financial flexibility (1)10% of allocations for indicators of the same type (output / result). No increase of the LS or UC, no transfer between outputs & results, no change of milestones
Decision:Output 1: 100 € /10 people trained (UC 10€/pt) Output 2: 100 € / 100 people followed up (UC 1€/pf)Result 1: 100 € /10 people in employment after 3 months (UC 10€/pe)
Final: 90 € for 9 people trained, 105 € (+5%) for 105 people followed up (Max 110/110)100 € (capped) for 11 people in employment after 3 months.
Financial flexibility (2)
• Indicators of the same "substance"
• Ex: UC = child occupying a place in a childcare service
• - with an attendance rate > 70% = 100 €• - with an attendance rate > 30%, <70% = 50€• - with an attendance rate < 30% = 0 €
Audit issues
-Audit of public procurement : focus on procedures, no audit of the amounts paid.
-Necessary to keep this possibility = respect of applicable law can be verified