1
An Electron-Rich 2-Alkylthieno[3,4-b]thiophene Building Block with Excellent
Electronic and Morphological Tunability for High-Performance Small-Molecule Solar
Cells
Shengjie Xu, ‡a, c Zichun Zhou, ‡a,c Haijun Fan,a Longbin Ren,a,c Feng Liu, *,b,d Xiaozhang Zhu,*,a,c and
Thomas P. Russelld,e
a Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, CAS Key Laboratory of Organic Solids, Institute of
Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. E-mail: [email protected]
b Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China. E-mail:
c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
d Polymer Science and Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
01003, United States
e Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United
States
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Journal of Materials Chemistry A.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
2
5.10 eV
3.04 eV
: 664.9 nmf : 1.41
5.34 eV
3.03 eV
: 601.3 nmf : 1.24
Fig. S1 DFT-calculated orbital energy diagram and pictorial representation of frontier orbitals for STB-n (STB-1: R1 = n-octyl, R2 = ethyl; STB-2: R1 = EH, R2 = ethyl; STB-3: R1 = EH, R2 = methyl) and the reference compound STB-r (EH = 2-ethylhexyl, HD = 2-hexyldecyl). Calculations were conducted at the DFT//B3LYP/6-31G** level. Alkyl substituents were replaced by methyl groups to simplify the calculations.
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
-2.0x10-5
-1.0x10-5
0.0
1.0x10-5
2.0x10-5
I/A
Potential (V vs Fc/Fc+)
STB-3
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-2.0x10-5
-1.5x10-5
-1.0x10-5
-5.0x10-6
0.0
5.0x10-6
1.0x10-5
1.5x10-5
I/A
Potential (V vs Fc/Fc+)
STB-1
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
-2.5x10-5
-2.0x10-5
-1.5x10-5
-1.0x10-5
-5.0x10-6
0.05.0x10-6
1.0x10-5
1.5x10-5
I/A
Potential (V vs Fc/Fc+)
STB-r
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-2.5x10-5
-2.0x10-5
-1.5x10-5
-1.0x10-5
-5.0x10-6
0.05.0x10-6
1.0x10-5
1.5x10-5
2.0x10-5
I/A
Potential (V vs Fc/Fc+)
STB-2(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. S2 Cyclic voltammogram of (a) STB-1, (b) STB-2, (c) STB-3, and (d) STB-r in diluted CH2Cl2 solution with a scan rate of 100 mV s-1.
3
(a) (b)
(c)
100 200 300 400 50040
50
60
70
80
90
100
Wei
ght(%
)
Temperature(oC)
STR-1
T5%= 364oC
100 200 300 400 50040
50
60
70
80
90
100
T5%= 368oC
Wei
ght(%
)
Temperature(oC)
STB-2
100 200 300 400 50040
50
60
70
80
90
100
T5%= 365oC
Wei
ght (
%)
Temperature(oC)
STB-3
Fig. S3 Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of compounds (a) STB-1, (b) STB-2, and (c) STB-3.
Table S1. Photovoltaic performance of STB-n-based solar cells with different thicknesses with device structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layer/Ca/Ala
Cpd. Thickness (nm)
Voc
(V)Jsc
(mA cm–2)Fill factor
(FF)PCE(%)
STB-1 80 0.935 10.55 0.64 6.30 100 0.938 11.20 0.63 6.61 120 0.938 10.87 0.63 6.42
STB-2 80 0.900 13.82 0.66 7.34100 0.901 13.12 0.66 7.84120 0.906 12.84 0.67 7.79
STB-3 80 0.917 12.85 0.70 8.24100 0.921 13.03 0.71 8.47120 0.923 12.79 0.71 8.38
a With CHCl3 vapor annealing.
4
Table S2. Photovoltaic performance of STB-3-based solar cells with different thicknesses with device structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layer/PFN/Ala
Thickness (nm)
Voc
(V)Jsc
(mA cm–2)Fill factor
(FF)PCE[%]
80 0.925 13.66 0.72 9.09 120 0.928 14.24 0.70 9.26 140 0.933 14.18 0.68 9.01 160 0.931 13.82 0.69 8.87
aWith CHCl3 vapor annealing.
Fig. S4 Tapping-mode AFM height images of optimal blend films cast from chloroform solution: (a) STB-1:PC71BM, the RMS roughness is 0.75 nm. (b) STB-2:PC71BM, the RMS roughness is 0.47 nm. (c) STB-3:PC71BM, the RMS roughness is 0.41 nm. (d) STB-1:PC71BM, with SVA treatment, the RMS roughness is 0.77 nm. (e) STB-2:PC71BM, with SVA treatment, the RMS roughness is 0.49 nm. (f) STB-3:PC71BM, with SVA treatment, the RMS roughness is 0.56 nm. (Atomic force microscope investigation was performed using Bruker MultiMode 8 AFM in “tapping” mode.)
5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.530
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
J0.5 / A
0.5 m
-1
Vappl-Vbr-Vbi / V
after SVA before SVA
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
after SVA before SVA
J0.5 / A
0.5 m
-1
Vappl-Vbr-Vbi / V
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.52030405060708090
100110120130
J0.5 / A
0.5 m
-1
Vappl-Vbr-Vbi / V
after SVA before SVA
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
after SVA before SVA
J0.5 / A
0.5 m
-1Vappl-Vbr-Vbi / V
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.540
60
80
100
120
140
160
after SVA before SVA
J0.5 / A
0.5 m
-1
Vappl-Vbr-Vbi / V
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.520
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
after SVA before SVA
J0.5 / A
0.5 m
-1
Vappl-Vbr-Vbi / V
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
Fig. S5 J0.5 vs V plots: STB-1/PC71BM (1:1.5, w/w) hole-only diode (a) and electron-only diode (b), STB-2/PC71BM (1:1.5, w/w) hole-only diode (c) and electron-only diode (d), STB-3/PC71BM (1:1.5, w/w) hole-only diode (e) and electron-only diode (f).
0.01 0.1 1
10
100
STB-1 STB-2 STB-3
J ph (A
m-2)
Veff (V)
Fig. S6 Photocurrent density versus effective voltage (Jph–Veff) characteristics for three devices under constant incident light intensity (AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2).
6
20 40 60 80 1001
10
J ph
(mA
cm-2
)
Light Intensity (mW cm-2)
=0.973(a) (b)
20 40 60 80 1001
10
J ph (m
A cm
-2)
Light Intensity (mW cm-2)
=0.977
20 40 60 80 1001
10
J ph (m
A cm
-2)
Light Intensity (mW cm-2)
=0.981(c)
20 40 60 80 1001
10
J ph (m
A cm
-2)
Light Intensity (mW cm-2)
=0.992(d)
Fig. S7 Measured Jph of STB-1-based (a), STB-2-based (b), STB-3-based (c) and STB-3-based with PFN cathode interlayer (d) solar cells plotted against light intensity on the logarithmic scale.
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
Voltage (V)
Curr
ent d
ensi
ty (m
A cm
-2)
STB-r as-cast STB-r SVA
400 500 600 7000
5
10
15
20
25
30
EQE
(%)
Wavelength (nm)
STB-r as-cast STB-r SVA
(a) (b)
Fig. S8 (a) Characteristic density vs voltage (J-V) curves and (b) external quantum efficiency (EQE) curves of STB-r.
7
Table S3. Photovoltaic performance of STB-r-based solar cells with device structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layer/Ca/Al
Cpd. Treatment Voc
(V)Jsc
(mA cm–2)Fill factor
(FF)PCE(%)
STB-r none 1.12 2.51 0.49 1.39 SVAa 1.11 3.25 0.64 2.24
aWith CHCl3 vapor annealing.
8
NMR Charts6,6-(4,8-Bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]dithiophene-2,6-diyl)bis(2-octylthieno[3,4-b]thiophene-4-carbaldehyde) (6)
9
6,6-(4,8-Bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]dithiophene-2,6-diyl)bis(2-(2-ethylhexyl)thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-4-carbaldehyde) (7)
10
(5Z,5Z)-5,5-((6,6`-(4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]dithiophene-2,6-diyl)bis(2-octylthieno[3,4-b]thiophene-6,4-diyl))bis(methanylylidene))bis(3-ethyl-2-thioxo-thiazolidin-4-one) (STB-1)
11
(5Z,5Z)-5,5-((6,6-(4,8-Bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]dithiophene-2,6-diyl)bis(2-(2-ethylhexyl)thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-6,4-diyl))bis(methanylylidene))bis(3-ethyl-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one) (STB-2)
12
(5Z,5Z)-5,5-((6,6-(4,8-Bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]dithiophene-2,6-diyl)bis(2-(2-ethylhexyl)thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-6,4-diyl))bis(methanylylidene))bis(3-methyl-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one) (STB-3)
13
(5Z,5Z)-5,5-((5,5-(4,8-Bis(5-(2-hexyldecyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]dithiophene-2,6-diyl)bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(methanylylidene))bis(3-octyl-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one) (STB-r)
14
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrum of STB-1
15
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrum of STB-2
16
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrum of STB-3