The 36th Annual Meeting of the Molecular Biology
Society of Japan
Presented by
Yukti Bharwani
December 05, 2013
1
Session Outline
Part 1: Common language mistakes made by Japanese authors and some tips to avoid them
Part 2: Essential tips to publish successfully
2
Part 1: Common language mistakes made by Japanese authors and some tips to avoid them
Part 2: Essential tips to publish successfully
3
• How many of you have already written a research paper?
• If yes, how many of you felt that you couldn’t document your research as well as you could/should have?
• Do you know what each part of a paper should include?
Show of Hands
4
By the end of this session, you will
• Be able to recognize some errors commonly made by authors when writing each part of a paper
• Receive some tips on how to avoid making such errors
Objectives
5
• Mismatch with the journal
• Lack of originality, novelty, or significance
• Flaws in study design
• Poor writing and organization
• Inadequate preparation of the manuscript
• Reasons not related to the manuscript, like space constraints
Common reasons for manuscript rejection
6
Title
7
Common errors
Includes non-essential information
Includes waster words (e.g., study of,
investigates)
Titles taken from articles published in BMC Biochemistry (CC-by license)
Title
8
Tips
Answer the questions:
– What is the paper about?
– What techniques/ designs were used?
– Who/what is studied?
– What were the results?
Contain useful keywords
Titles taken from articles published in BMC Biochemistry (CC-by license)
Keywords
Common errors
Insufficient time is spent on thinking of
relevant keywords
Keywords are too generic or too specific
9
Titles taken from articles published in BMC Biochemistry (CC-by license)
Keywords
Tips Understand that this is important; journals, search engines, and
indexing and abstracting services classify papers using keywords
Use accurate list of keywords to ensure correct indexing
Contain terms/phrases that are used repeatedly in the text.
Include variants of a term/phrase (e.g., kidney and renal), drug
names, procedures, etc
• Note: Type the keywords into Google Scholar and check if the results include similar papers or at least papers that match the subject of the manuscript.
10
Titles taken from articles published in BMC Biochemistry (CC-by license)
Cover letter
Common errors
The cover letter is just a summary of the study
The cover letter contains general statements
like “We believe this study is suitable for the
journal.”
11
Tips
Include a convincing reason why you have chosen to
submit to the journal and why the paper is suitable for
the journal
Talk about why the work is interesting and important
Include declarations required by the journal (e.g., that all
authors approve the submission, author contributions,
ethics declarations)
Cover letter
12
Introduction
Sets the context for the study and problem. Several readers may not understand the significance of your study right away, so it’s best to use general language and carefully developed logic to guide readers to the main problem/objective of the study.
13
Introduction
Common error
The introduction reviews all studies that have
ever been published on the topic
14
Tips Describe the rationale for undertaking the study
Explain how the research makes an important contribution to the field or advances knowledge
State the research question clearly
Explain the theoretical framework that the study is based on
Provide a background of the problem or issue that your research aims to understand or resolve, citing studies to support your arguments
Summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, citing studies as appropriate
Introduction
15
Methods
This section is the most specific to your study. A primary criterion for well-conducted research is that it must be replicable. This will enable another researcher to reproduce the results by following the methods detailed in your paper.
16
Methods
Common errors
Excludes important details simply to avoid a lengthy
description of the methods
17
Methods
Tips
Provide full details of all methods, techniques, and instruments
Include an image or diagram of the experimental setup
Describe the questionnaire, survey, or other data collection
instruments
Provide or cite studies that support the validity and reliability of
the analysis methods and instruments
Describe the lab settings or environment
Explain the analysis methods and why you chose them
18
Results
This section includes all details about the data and results so that readers can understand the results without spending too much time reading this section.
19
Results
Common errors
Include detailed descriptions of the results in
the text even though you have illustrated
these results in figures and tables
Generalizations of the results
20
Tips
Use tables and figures effectively to present results in a
manner that’s easy to understand at a glance
Explain what the results are saying, rather than simply
stating the statistical data (e.g., “X was found to
substantially increase with Y [followed by statistical data]”
rather than “X and Y had a positive correlation of .73”)
Results
21
Discussion
This section extends the specific results to their broader implications, which can then be tied in with the general background given in the introduction. Readers should understand what the research/data is saying and how and why.
22
Discussion
Common errors
Repeat the results in this section
Draw conclusions that are not supported by the data
23
Tips
Start by stating whether the hypothesis was supported
Interpret the results: what do the results imply?
Relate the findings to those of previous studies, for example, whether the results support or deviate from results in previous studies
Explain how the study adds to previous knowledge
Mention possible alternative explanations for the results
Address the limitations of the study
Discussion
24
Conclusion
This section states the main conclusions of the study in the context of the formulated problem.
25
Conclusion
Common errors
Oversell the research or “overgeneralize” the
results, that is, stretch the study findings to
provide suggestions or conclusions that the
research doesn’t really support
Simply summarize the results
26
Tips
Explain what the authors have learned from the study
Ensure that the conclusion is directly related to the research
question and stated purpose of the study
Elaborate on the broader implications of the research
Suggest specific future avenues of research to advance the
knowledge that’s been gained from the study or answer
questions that your study did not address
Conclusion
27
References
Common errors
The references in the text (citations) are not listed in the references section at the end of the paper
All the sources referred to are not listed in the references section
28
Tips
Acknowledging a peer’s work is of utmost importance. Give credit to the original work
Don’t forget to check that all citations are also listed in the references section at the end
References
29
Other errors—miscount
Sometimes these changes are introduced while incorporating review changes. Authors might add/delete items and forget to update the corresponding number.
Example: The three dimensions: time, length, width, and depth
30
Tips
Count every list you have numbered.
Other errors—miscount
31
Other errors—the number zero
32
Wrong number of zeros or the wrong exponent
Example: 100,000 when you actually mean ten thousand
Other errors—the number zero
33
Tip
To catch this error, you will have to rely on the context and your subject matter expertise
Other errors—the number zero
34
Letter O for 0 and letter I for 1 or vice versa
Example: In 2003, elderly people constituted 1O.6% of India’s population.
Other errors—the number zero
35
Tip
Sometimes there is a typo and sometimes it is difficult to tell. Look out for this error in equations!
Questions?
Hmm. All very good questions!
Part 1: Common language mistakes made by Japanese authors and some tips to avoid them
Part 2: Essential tips to publish successfully
37
The Research Challenge
• You believe you have something to contribute to the scientific literature
• You believe that your data is good
• You have a hard time writing and expressing yourself in English
• You are under great pressure to publish in high-impact peer-reviewed western journals
38
39
The Standard Approach:
• Choose the science
• Select the audience
• Select the journal
• Write the manuscript, submit, and hope it is accepted
However, before you even start the process, you need to understand one very important concept:
How to Navigate the Process
40
41
Unfortunately
• You are not writing for yourself
• You are not writing for the simple intent of writing
• You are not writing for your career advancement
You are ONLY writing for two “Gatekeepers”
1. The Journal Editor
2. The Peer Reviewer
These are the two people that you need to solve for, and in that order.
Who Are the Gatekeepers?
42
• Always keep in mind that the Journal Editor and the Peer Reviewer are professionals just like you!
They are:
• Successful in research
• Successful as writers
Who Are the Gatekeepers?
43
The Journal Editor has the job to determine whether your manuscript will:
• Interest the journal readership?
• Advance knowledge in the field?
• Improve coverage of this particular topic in the journal?
• Improve the reputation of the journal and help increase the journal’s Impact Factor?
The Job of the Journal Editor
They are busy people and they are also thinking about:
• Publication timelines
• High publishing standards
• Budgetary constraints
• Pleasing editorial boards
• Managing staff
• …and many other things!
44
45
Yes. Absolutely. Have the conversation before you submit the manuscript…especially, if you have never submitted a paper to the journal before.
Reasons:
• You will save time if the format or subject matter of the paper is out of the scope of the journal
• When the manuscript is received, the Journal Editor will already have a positive perception
• You will no longer be simply a name on a piece of paper
Should You Contact the Journal Editor?
46
47
Editorial steps:
• They read the cover letter
• They read the title of the manuscript
• They read the abstract
• They look at the results
• They jump to the discussion and conclusions
… and yes, unfortunately, they look at the names on the by-line to see if they recognize any well-known researchers.
How Do They Look at Your Paper?
48
49
Example of a Manuscript Title
Original How an Editage editor
would edit it
• A study of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7
• Expression, purification, and biochemical characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7
• Fatty acyl-CoA reductases of birds
• Avian fatty acyl-coA reductases are expressed together with wax ester synthases
Titles taken from articles published in BMC Biochemistry (CC-by license)
50
Readability of the English Language
You dno’t have to be raelly smrat to raed tihs. In the Elgnsih lugnagae it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers are in a wrod. The olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteers are pneiostiod in the rghit pclae. The rset of the lrtetes can be jmulebd and you can sitll raed it wiuthot porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn barin deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but lokos for sncetnene and luganage petatnrs.
51
Readability of the English Language
52
You don’t have to be really smart to read this. In the English language it doesn't matter in what order the letters are in a word. The only important thing is that the first and last letters are positioned in the right place. The rest of the letters can be jumbled and you can still read it without problem. This is because the human brain does not read every letter by itself, but looks for sentence and language patterns.
53
Before your manuscript reaches the Journal Editor, evaluate the manuscript carefully:
• Have you selected the right manuscript structure and journal for your research?
• Are your findings complete?
• Is your study novel?
• How will your study advance knowledge in the field?
• Have you followed the journal guidelines?
• Are there any grammatical or typographical errors?
So Where Do You Start?
54
55
Did you follow the standard IMRAD scientific format when
writing your manuscript?
Introduction | Materials + Methods | Results | (and) | Discussion
Did you review the Instructions for Authors for the journal?
Structural Elements to Consider
56
This resource also contains links to some of the most respected research and authorship guidelines, such as ICMJE, COPE, CONSORT, etc.
57
Questions?
Hmm. All very good questions!
Contact Information
Cactus Communications K.K. Website: www.editage.jp Yukti Bharwani Email: [email protected]
Dr. EddyTM
personifies our efforts to support authors with good
publication practices.