05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 1
Lawrence M. Hinman, Ph.D.Director, The Values InstituteUniversity of San Diego
Divine Command Theories of Ethics
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 2
OverviewWe will consider three different
accounts of the relationship between religion and reason in ethics:
Religion takes priority over reason:– Divine command theories– Teleological suspension of the ethical
Compatibilist theories Autonomy of reason theories
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 3
Divine Command Theories
These theories claim that something is right because God wills it.– Augustine and the voluntarist tradition– Clear in Islam, where the will of Allah is
the measure of all that is right Also characteristic of much of
fundamentalism in all religions.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 4
Euthyphro’s Dilemma
Is something good because God wills it? Or does God will it because it is good?
If the former, what happens when God seems to will something contrary to our conscience, such as destroying all citizens of Jericho (Joshua 8)?
If the latter, this makes morality independent of God, a product of human reason. So divine commands are irrelevant.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 5
A way out of the dilemma
Aquinas and others have argued that “goodness is inherent in his nature”, so the way out of the dilemma is to see goodness inherent in God’s character, not his words. So if God is love, justice, truth, compassion, his words must reflect these attributes or be discounted.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 6
William of Ockham (1287-1327)
God himself is the standard of goodness God has always commanded us to be
kind, however, he could command unkindness
There are no constraints, logical or moral, on God’s power and freedom
God is a paradigm of metaphysical freedom, so it makes sense to say “man is made in God’s image”
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 7
Ockham contd
Ockham admits it’s hard to imagine a world where God reverses his commands
Yet it is a possibility: God is ultimately free:
“Hatred, theft, adultery may involve evil..as far as anything absolute is involved in them God can perform them without involving any evil”.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 8
Exercise: Divine Command and William of Ockham
How would William of Ockham reply to Euthyphro’s dilemma?
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 9
Criticisms of Divine Command Theories
How can we know God’s will? Does divine command theory
undermine human freedom and choice?
Can be used to dominate the masses by removing rational debate.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 10
Abraham and Isaac
In the Old Testament, God commands Abraham to sacrifice his only son, Isaac.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 11
The Story of AbrahamGenesis, 22:1-10And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am. And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of. And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and saddled his ass, and took two of his young men with him, and Isaac his son, and clave the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up, and went unto the place of which God had told him. Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off. And Abraham said unto his young men, Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you. And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac his son; and he took the fire in his hand, and a knife; and they went both of them together. And Isaac spake unto Abraham his father, and said, My father: and he said, Here am I, my son. And he said, Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering? And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together. And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood. And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 12
The Story of AbrahamGenesis, 22:11-19 And the angel of the LORD called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he
said, Here am I. And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me. And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son. And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen. And the angel of the LORD called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time, And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the LORD, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son: That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice. So Abraham returned unto his young men, and they rose up and went together to Beersheba; and Abraham dwelt at Beersheba.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 13
The Issue God’s command that Abraham
should kill his only son as a sacrifice to God seems to go against reason and morality
The issue: can God ask us to do things that go against reason and morality? Which takes precedence, God’s command or reason?
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 14
The Teleological Suspension of the Ethical
According to Søren Kierkegaard, sometimes it is necessary to suspend the ethical for the sake of God
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 15
Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
Kierkegaard sought to heighten the tension between faith and reason, rather than try as Hegel had done to minimize it.
We should have faith in God even if reason says it is absurd.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 16
Compatibilist Theories
Compatibilist theories say that reason and religion can never contradict one another– Strong: they are saying the same thing–Weak: they say different things, but not
contradictory things
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 17
Strong Compatibilism
G. W. F. Hegel (1770-1831) thought that reason and religion could be completely reconciled.
Religion presents same truths as reason, but under a different form, as myth rather than as reason.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 18
Weak Compatibilism
Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) believed that reason and faith could never contradict one another, but faith may reveal truths beyond the reach of reason.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 19
Supremacy of Reason
Bertrand Russell thought that religion was simply wrong, and reason was the sole guide for action.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 20
Rationalistic Theists
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Believed in God, but felt that even God was subject to the dictates of reason.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 21
Criticisms of Autonomy of Reason Theories
The heritage of the Enlightenment: belief in reason and autonomy and individualism
Challenges to the Enlightenment belief:– Human acts of irrationality: the
Holocaust, enslavement of African-Americans by “christians”, etc.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 22
A Crucial Distinction
Distinguish two questions:– Content. Can reason provide us with
adequate guidelines about how we should act? The answer appears to be “yes.”
–Motivation. Can reason provide us with adequate motivation to do the right thing? Here the answer appears to be “no.”
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 23
Possible Relationships between
Religion and Reason in Ethics
Supremacy of Religion
Compatibilist Theories
Supremacy of Reason
Strong version All morality based on divine commands Fundamentalism
Reason and religion are identical Hegel
Ethics based only on reason; atheistic or agnostic Russell
Weak version Teleological suspension of the ethical because ends are only known to GodKierkegaard
Reason and religion may be different but do not conflict Aquinas
Even God must follow dictates of reasonKant
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 24
The Role of Religion in the Moral Life
Key question: Is religion harmful or helpful to the moral life?
Answer may hinge on relation of reason to divine revelation (Bible or Qu’ran). Or, the relation of religious authority to the individual (is the Pope or conscience supreme?)
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 25
Religion as Harmful to the Moral Life
Karl Marx: Religion is the opiate of the masses, used to enslave them.
For Marx, religion was only a tool for oppression.
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 26
Religion as Harmful to the Moral Life
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
The Death of God Nihilism Slave morality
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 27
Religion as Transcendence Supporters of religion
point to the way the religious consciousness allows individuals to transcend the oppression of their times.
Oscar Romero of El Salvador (murdered for opposing the regime in 1980)
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 28
Religion and Ultimate Justice
Is religion necessary to insure ultimate justice, as Kant believed, that those who suffer in this world will be recompensed and that those who gain in this world through treachery will be punished in the next?
05/03/23 (c) Lawrence M. Hinman 29
Summary
Religion can, and has been, used to oppress people, especially when combined with an argument for divine authority for human agents or for God’s word.
But if we are “made in the image of God” it could be argued that the ethical way discovered by our reason is really God’s way, and that any revelation of God’s will is always partial and subject to some cultural relativity.