Transcript
Page 1: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Detailed report of processing GDV images in the GDV Scientific Laboratory program

Date and time of processing: 5/7/2009 4:05:18 PM

The following GDV parameters of GDV images were calculated during processing:AreaAverage intensityEntropy intervals count

Statistical comparison of 3 samples of dynamic GDV images is performed:

Sample1C:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\LDW 05.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\LDW 01.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\LDW 02.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\LDW 03.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\LDW 04.avi

Sample2C:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CCU 05.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CCU 01.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CCU 02.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CCU 03.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CCU 04.avi

Sample3C:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CMPU 05.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CMPU 01.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CMPU 02.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CMPU 03.aviC:\GDVDATA\NEW\Water Study\Claytons Water Study 042409\CMPU 04.avi

Time series of GDV parameters:

Area

1

Page 2: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Time

Are

a

0.00 0.99 1.99 2.98 3.97 4.97 5.96 6.95 7.95 8.94 9.93-363.00

968.00

2299.00

3630.00

The plots legend:

Sample1Mean + confidence interval

Sample2Mean + confidence interval

Sample3Mean + confidence interval

Average intensity

Time

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

0.00 0.99 1.99 2.98 3.97 4.97 5.96 6.95 7.95 8.94 9.93-20.00

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

180.00

2

Page 3: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

The plots legend:

Sample1Mean + confidence interval

Sample2Mean + confidence interval

Sample3Mean + confidence interval

Entropy intervals count

Time

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

0.00 0.99 1.99 2.98 3.97 4.97 5.96 6.95 7.95 8.94 9.93-4.00

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

32.00

The plots legend:

Sample1Mean + confidence interval

Sample2Mean + confidence interval

Sample3Mean + confidence interval

Trends of time series of GDV parameters:

Area

3

Page 4: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Time

Are

a

0.00 0.99 1.99 2.98 3.97 4.97 5.96 6.95 7.95 8.94 9.93-601.00

6010.00

The plots legend:

Sample1Mean + confidence interval

Sample2Mean + confidence interval

Sample3Mean + confidence interval

Average intensity

Time

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

0.00 0.99 1.99 2.98 3.97 4.97 5.96 6.95 7.95 8.94 9.93-31.00

0.00

31.00

62.00

93.00

124.00

155.00

186.00

217.00

248.00

279.00

4

Page 5: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

The plots legend:

Sample1Mean + confidence interval

Sample2Mean + confidence interval

Sample3Mean + confidence interval

Entropy intervals count

Time

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

0.00 0.99 1.99 2.98 3.97 4.97 5.96 6.95 7.95 8.94 9.93-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

The plots legend:

Sample1Mean + confidence interval

Sample2Mean + confidence interval

Sample3Mean + confidence interval

The results of statistical comparison

Statistical comparison of 3 independent samples performed. Used parametric test: ANOVA one way test

ANOVA one way test

Area

5

Page 6: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

By frame statistical comparison of time seriesRankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

frame 1 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 2 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 3 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 4 40 162.5 262.5 4.476 0.1068frame 5 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 6 40 161.5 263.5 4.51 0.105frame 7 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 8 40 164.5 260.5 4.42 0.1099frame 9 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 10 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 11 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 12 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 13 40 162.5 262.5 4.476 0.1068frame 14 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 15 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 16 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 17 40 167 258 4.374 0.1124frame 18 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 19 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 20 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 21 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 22 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 23 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 24 40 164.5 260.5 4.42 0.1099frame 25 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 26 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 27 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 28 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 29 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 30 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 31 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 32 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 33 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 34 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 35 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 36 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 37 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 38 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 39 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 40 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127

6

Page 7: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 41 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 42 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 43 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 44 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 45 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 46 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 47 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 48 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 49 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 50 40 162.5 262.5 4.476 0.1068frame 51 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 52 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 53 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 54 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 55 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 56 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 57 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 58 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 59 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 60 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 61 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 62 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 63 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 64 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 65 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 66 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 67 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 68 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 69 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 70 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 71 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 72 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 73 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 74 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 75 40 161 264 4.529 0.104frame 76 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 77 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 78 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 79 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 80 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 81 40 165 260 4.409 0.1105frame 82 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 83 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 84 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127

7

Page 8: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 85 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 86 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 87 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 88 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 89 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 90 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 91 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 92 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 93 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 94 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 95 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 96 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 97 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 98 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 99 40 164.5 260.5 4.42 0.1099frame 100 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 101 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 102 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 103 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 104 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 105 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 106 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 107 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 108 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 109 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 110 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 111 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 112 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 113 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 114 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 115 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 116 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 117 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 118 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 119 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 120 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 121 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 122 40 164.5 260.5 4.42 0.1099frame 123 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 124 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 125 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 126 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 127 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 128 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127

8

Page 9: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 129 40 164.5 260.5 4.42 0.1099frame 130 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 131 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 132 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 133 40 163.5 261.5 4.446 0.1085frame 134 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 135 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 136 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 137 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 138 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 139 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 140 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 141 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 142 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 143 40 166.5 258.5 4.381 0.112frame 144 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 145 40 165.5 259.5 4.398 0.111frame 146 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 147 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 148 40 167.5 257.5 4.368 0.1127frame 149 51 164.5 249.5 2.177 0.3368frame 150 77.5 155 232.5 0 0

Statistical comparison of time series characteristics

Count

Are

a

135

165

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

9

Page 10: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Sum

Are

a

1.1423e+005

4.0509e+005

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.86507e-020

Min

Are

a

-1

1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

10

Page 11: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Max

Are

a

865.7

3077.6

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 9.93592e-013

Mean

Are

a

761.5

2700.6

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.86507e-020

11

Page 12: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

RMS

Are

a

83.08

313.17

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 2.2312e-008

Median

Are

a

773.08

2705.43

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.75251e-022

12

Page 13: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

25 percentile

Are

a

743.5

2671.8

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 4.62229e-022

75 percentile

Are

a

795.3

2770.8

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.00285e-020

13

Page 14: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Are

a

-9.5

-5.0

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.231245

Are

a

36.8

91.8

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.235804

14

Page 15: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Confidence interval

Are

a

13.3

50.1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 2.22285e-008

Time entropy

Are

a

-1.3

4.5

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.792295

15

Page 16: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Entropy intervals

Are

a

-1222

4047.4

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.711759

Time fractality

Are

a

1.80

2.04

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.666705

16

Page 17: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Time fractality RMS

Are

a

0.04

0.07

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.699627

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

Count 40 40 40 0 0Sum 15 65 40 12.5 0.002269Min 40 40 40 0 0Max 15 61 44 10.82 0.00477Mean 15 65 40 12.5 0.002269RMS 15 52 53 9.38 0.009446Median 15 65 40 12.5 0.00226925 percentile 15 65 40 12.5 0.00226975 percentile 15 65 40 12.5 0.002269Skewness 56 31 33 3.86 0.1453Excess 24 49 47 3.86 0.1453Confidence interval

15 52 53 9.38 0.009446

Time entropy

35.5 41 43.5 0.335 0.8458

Entropy intervals

33.5 43.5 43 0.635 0.728

Time fractality

47 42 31 1.34 0.5118

Fractality RMS

36 31 53 2.66 0.2646

17

Page 18: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Polynomial trend coefficients

Polynomial trend coefficient: K0

Are

a

772.09

3105.94

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 7.87323e-012

Polynomial trend coefficient: K1

Are

a

-20.4

-1.7

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.047689

18

Page 19: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Polynomial trend coefficient: K2

Are

a

0.04

0.38

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.00697544

Polynomial trend coefficient: K3

Are

a

-0.0019

-0.0002

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.00172604

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

K0 15 65 40 12.5 0.002269K1 64 26 30 8.72 0.01303K2 15 54 51 9.42 0.00927

19

Page 20: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

K3 65 27 28 9.38 0.009446

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Exponential trend coefficients

Exponential trend coefficient: A

Are

a

840.89

3216.05

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.15244e-012

Exponential trend coefficient: B

Are

a

-0.004

-0.002

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.898997

20

Page 21: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Exponential trend coefficient: CA

rea

-2

0

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

A 15 61 44 10.82 0.00477B 43 35 42 0.38 0.827C 40 40 40 0 0

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Power trend coefficients

21

Page 22: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Power trend coefficient: A

Are

a

1019.09

4541.06

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 8.10347e-007

Power trend coefficient: B

Are

a

-0.19

-0.09

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.859367

22

Page 23: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Power trend coefficient: C

Are

a

-1

1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 1

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

A 15 60 45 10.5 0.005535B 38 39 43 0.14 0.9324C 40 40 40 0 0

Average intensity

By frame statistical comparison of time seriesRankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

frame 1 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 2 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 3 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 4 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 5 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 6 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 7 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 8 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 9 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 10 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 11 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 12 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 13 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 14 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045

23

Page 24: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 15 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 16 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 17 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 18 40 144.5 280.5 5.753 0.05651frame 19 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 20 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 21 40 147.5 277.5 5.444 0.06594frame 22 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 23 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 24 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 25 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 26 40 145.5 279.5 5.646 0.05962frame 27 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 28 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 29 40 143.5 281.5 5.865 0.05345frame 30 40 147.5 277.5 5.444 0.06594frame 31 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 32 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 33 40 144.5 280.5 5.753 0.05651frame 34 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 35 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 36 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 37 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 38 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 39 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 40 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 41 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 42 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 43 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 44 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 45 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 46 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 47 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 48 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 49 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 50 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 51 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 52 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 53 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 54 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 55 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 56 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 57 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 58 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045

24

Page 25: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 59 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 60 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 61 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 62 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 63 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 64 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 65 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 66 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 67 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 68 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 69 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 70 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 71 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 72 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 73 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 74 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 75 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 76 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 77 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 78 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 79 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 80 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 81 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 82 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 83 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 84 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 85 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 86 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 87 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 88 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 89 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 90 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 91 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 92 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 93 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 94 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 95 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 96 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 97 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 98 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 99 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 100 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 101 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 102 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045

25

Page 26: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 103 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 104 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 105 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 106 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 107 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 108 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 109 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 110 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 111 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 112 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 113 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 114 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 115 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 116 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 117 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 118 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 119 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 120 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 121 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 122 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 123 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 124 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 125 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 126 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 127 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 128 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 129 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 130 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 131 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 132 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 133 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 134 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 135 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 136 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 137 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 138 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 139 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 140 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 141 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 142 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 143 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 144 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 145 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 146 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045

26

Page 27: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 147 40 142.5 282.5 5.981 0.05045frame 148 40 145.5 279.5 5.646 0.05962frame 149 45 156.5 263.5 3.555 0.1691frame 150 77.5 155 232.5 0 0

Statistical comparison of time series characteristics

Count

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

135

165

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

27

Page 28: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Sum

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

16014

22473

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 5.00912e-014

Min

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-1

1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

28

Page 29: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Max

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

115.9

152.3

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 6.36692e-012

Mean

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

106.8

149.8

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 4.99036e-014

29

Page 30: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

RMS

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

9.0

15.6

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.0034122

Median

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

107.5

151.3

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.60971e-014

30

Page 31: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

25 percentile

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

105.32

151.02

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.40604e-014

75 percentile

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

109.4

151.6

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 3.18221e-013

31

Page 32: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-12.6

-9.5

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.0539829

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

94.2

160.2

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.160095

32

Page 33: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Confidence interval

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

1.4

2.5

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.00342502

Time entropy

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

0.03

0.06

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.389653

33

Page 34: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Entropy intervals

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

2

4

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

Time fractality

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

1.9

2.0

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.0513256

34

Page 35: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Time fractality RMS

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

0.04

0.07

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.0213214

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

Count 40 40 40 0 0Sum 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269Min 40 40 40 0 0Max 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269Mean 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269RMS 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269Median 15 40 65 12.5 0.00226925 percentile 15 40 65 12.5 0.00226975 percentile 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269Skewness 60 24 36 6.72 0.03493Excess 20 56 44 6.72 0.03493Confidence interval

15 40 65 12.5 0.002269

Time entropy

37.5 37.5 45 0.375 0.8291

Entropy intervals

40 40 40 0 0

Time fractality

61 30 29 6.62 0.03672

Fractality RMS

22 41 57 6.14 0.0466

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Polynomial trend coefficients

35

Page 36: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Polynomial trend coefficient: K0A

vera

ge in

tens

ity

109.9

154.4

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 4.34806e-013

Polynomial trend coefficient: K1

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-0.5

-0.2

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.313187

36

Page 37: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Polynomial trend coefficient: K2

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

0.005

0.012

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.186771

Polynomial trend coefficient: K3

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-0.00006

-0.00003

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.114221

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

K0 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269

37

Page 38: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

K1 36 54 30 3.12 0.2103K2 34 31 55 3.42 0.181K3 53 47 20 6.18 0.04569

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Exponential trend coefficients

Exponential trend coefficient: A

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

112.8

168.2

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 3.49856e-010

38

Page 39: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Exponential trend coefficient: B

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-0.0021

-0.0008

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.196084

Exponential trend coefficient: C

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-2

0

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

A 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269

39

Page 40: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

B 62 32 26 7.44 0.02445C 40 40 40 0 0

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Power trend coefficients

Power trend coefficient: A

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

133.02

232.94

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.000289157

Power trend coefficient: B

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-0.14

-0.06

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.337876

40

Page 41: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Power trend coefficient: C

Ave

rage

inte

nsity

-1

1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 1

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

A 15 40 65 12.5 0.002269B 55 36 29 3.62 0.1638C 40 40 40 0 0

Entropy intervals count

By frame statistical comparison of time seriesRankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

frame 1 115 160.5 189.5 5.259 0.0723frame 2 115 160.5 189.5 5.259 0.0723frame 3 113 151 201 4.126 0.1272frame 4 112.5 142.5 210 3.798 0.1498frame 5 115 162.5 187.5 5.444 0.06594frame 6 115 162 188 5.396 0.06753frame 7 113 158 194 4.539 0.1035frame 8 115 160 190 5.215 0.07387frame 9 111 154.5 199.5 3.833 0.1472frame 10 115 152 198 4.665 0.09724frame 11 115 150 200 4.57 0.1019frame 12 115 155 195 4.839 0.08912

41

Page 42: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 13 111 153.5 200.5 3.78 0.1512frame 14 115 155.5 194.5 4.872 0.0877frame 15 115 158.5 191.5 5.091 0.07861frame 16 115 159.5 190.5 5.173 0.07545frame 17 113 152.5 199.5 4.197 0.1228frame 18 115 157.5 192.5 5.013 0.08168frame 19 115 147.5 202.5 4.476 0.1068frame 20 115 152.5 197.5 4.691 0.09595frame 21 115 158.5 191.5 5.091 0.07861frame 22 114 154 197 4.523 0.1043frame 23 115 159.5 190.5 5.173 0.07545frame 24 113 165 187 5.162 0.07585frame 25 115 161.5 188.5 5.349 0.06912frame 26 115 150 200 4.57 0.1019frame 27 115 155 195 4.839 0.08912frame 28 114 164 187 5.323 0.07frame 29 111 162 192 4.37 0.1126frame 30 115 150 200 4.57 0.1019frame 31 115 149 201 4.529 0.104frame 32 114 158.5 192.5 4.83 0.0895frame 33 115 153.5 196.5 4.747 0.09333frame 34 115 158 192 5.052 0.08016frame 35 113 161 191 4.78 0.09178frame 36 115 157.5 192.5 5.013 0.08168frame 37 112 157 196 4.223 0.1212frame 38 105 158.5 201.5 2.794 0.2475frame 39 112 162.5 190.5 4.662 0.09738frame 40 112.5 155 197.5 4.215 0.1217frame 41 103.5 167.5 194 3.221 0.1999frame 42 115 154 196 4.776 0.09196frame 43 112 164 189 4.804 0.09069frame 44 113 162.5 189.5 4.915 0.0858frame 45 115 160 190 5.215 0.07387frame 46 109 162 194 3.899 0.1425frame 47 115 154 196 4.776 0.09196frame 48 115 151.5 198.5 4.639 0.09845frame 49 114 160 191 4.952 0.08423frame 50 112.5 155.5 197 4.246 0.1198frame 51 115 160 190 5.215 0.07387frame 52 115 158.5 191.5 5.091 0.07861frame 53 115 162 188 5.396 0.06753frame 54 115 159.5 190.5 5.173 0.07545frame 55 115 153.5 196.5 4.747 0.09333frame 56 113.5 157 194.5 4.592 0.1008

42

Page 43: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 57 112 158 195 4.293 0.1171frame 58 115 159.5 190.5 5.173 0.07545frame 59 115 154.5 195.5 4.807 0.09054frame 60 115 162 188 5.396 0.06753frame 61 110 168 187 4.725 0.09434frame 62 115 156 194 4.905 0.08621frame 63 107.5 158 199.5 3.271 0.195frame 64 106 156 203 2.846 0.2411frame 65 115 161.5 188.5 5.349 0.06912frame 66 114.5 152 198.5 4.539 0.1035frame 67 115 163 187 5.492 0.06435frame 68 111 166 188 4.756 0.09291frame 69 111.5 161.5 192 4.449 0.1083frame 70 111.5 165 188.5 4.778 0.0919frame 71 110.5 163 191.5 4.339 0.1144frame 72 113 164.5 187.5 5.111 0.07782frame 73 112 161.5 191.5 4.572 0.1018frame 74 114 162 189 5.129 0.07713frame 75 109.5 152 203.5 3.378 0.1849frame 76 114 150 201 4.324 0.1152frame 77 115 160.5 189.5 5.259 0.0723frame 78 113 154 198 4.277 0.118frame 79 115 153 197 4.718 0.09466frame 80 115 163 187 5.492 0.06435frame 81 115 159.5 190.5 5.173 0.07545frame 82 115 157.5 192.5 5.013 0.08168frame 83 114 155 196 4.584 0.1012frame 84 115 162.5 187.5 5.444 0.06594frame 85 110.5 155.5 199 3.776 0.1515frame 86 98.5 154.5 212 1.5 0.4724frame 87 115 160 190 5.215 0.07387frame 88 115 154 196 4.776 0.09196frame 89 115 161 189 5.303 0.07071frame 90 110.5 149 205.5 3.484 0.1753frame 91 115 153 197 4.718 0.09466frame 92 115 157.5 192.5 5.013 0.08168frame 93 115 154 196 4.776 0.09196frame 94 114.5 156.5 194 4.811 0.09037frame 95 114 153.5 197.5 4.495 0.1058frame 96 113 157 195 4.467 0.1073frame 97 115 163 187 5.492 0.06435frame 98 115 157.5 192.5 5.013 0.08168frame 99 114 157.5 193.5 4.755 0.09297frame 100 109.5 157 198.5 3.642 0.162

43

Page 44: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 101 112 161.5 191.5 4.572 0.1018frame 102 115 151.5 198.5 4.639 0.09845frame 103 115 155 195 4.839 0.08912frame 104 115 161 189 5.303 0.07071frame 105 115 158.5 191.5 5.091 0.07861frame 106 115 154.5 195.5 4.807 0.09054frame 107 111.5 155.5 198 4.007 0.135frame 108 114 167 184 5.647 0.05957frame 109 115 161.5 188.5 5.349 0.06912frame 110 110 160.5 194.5 4.007 0.135frame 111 109 165.5 190.5 4.22 0.1214frame 112 115 151 199 4.615 0.09965frame 113 115 159 191 5.131 0.07705frame 114 115 158 192 5.052 0.08016frame 115 115 151 199 4.615 0.09965frame 116 115 162.5 187.5 5.444 0.06594frame 117 115 158.5 191.5 5.091 0.07861frame 118 115 159 191 5.131 0.07705frame 119 115 161 189 5.303 0.07071frame 120 115 144.5 205.5 4.398 0.111frame 121 112 164 189 4.804 0.09069frame 122 103.5 148.5 213 2.126 0.3455frame 123 113.5 157 194.5 4.592 0.1008frame 124 113.5 154 197.5 4.4 0.111frame 125 104 167.5 193.5 3.322 0.19frame 126 115 164.5 185.5 5.646 0.05962frame 127 112 147 206 3.758 0.1528frame 128 111.5 154 199.5 3.921 0.1409frame 129 111 149 205 3.593 0.166frame 130 113 154 198 4.277 0.118frame 131 115 160.5 189.5 5.259 0.0723frame 132 104 170.5 190.5 3.64 0.1622frame 133 112.5 156 196.5 4.277 0.118frame 134 114 152.5 198.5 4.441 0.1087frame 135 115 158 192 5.052 0.08016frame 136 115 162 188 5.396 0.06753frame 137 114 159 192 4.87 0.08778frame 138 115 157 193 4.976 0.08323frame 139 115 161 189 5.303 0.07071frame 140 115 154.5 195.5 4.807 0.09054frame 141 114 163.5 187.5 5.273 0.07176frame 142 115 161.5 188.5 5.349 0.06912frame 143 106.5 158 200.5 3.063 0.2163frame 144 114.5 156.5 194 4.811 0.09037

44

Page 45: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

frame 145 115 160.5 189.5 5.259 0.0723frame 146 115 163.5 186.5 5.542 0.06276frame 147 113 154.5 197.5 4.306 0.1163frame 148 115 154 196 4.776 0.09196frame 149 69 165.5 230.5 0.3322 0.847frame 150 77.5 155 232.5 0 0

Statistical comparison of time series characteristics

Count

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

135

165

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

45

Page 46: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Sum

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

1749.9

3038.0

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 3.3511e-010

Min

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-1

1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

46

Page 47: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Max

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

17.7

25.9

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 2.15502e-007

Mean

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

11.7

20.3

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 3.3511e-010

47

Page 48: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

RMS

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

1.9

2.8

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.000184776

Median

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

11.7

20.2

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.10921e-008

48

Page 49: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

25 percentile

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

10.1

19.4

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 3.35643e-010

75 percentile

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

12.6

22.0

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.22946e-010

49

Page 50: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-3.1

-0.7

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 2.83017e-006

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

5.8

22.7

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 5.2729e-006

50

Page 51: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Confidence interval

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

0.3

0.4

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.000184776

Time entropy

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

1.9

2.2

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.023663

51

Page 52: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Entropy intervals

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

19.2

39.8

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.328514

Time fractality

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

1.96

2.01

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.0401281

52

Page 53: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Time fractality RMS

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

0.05

0.06

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.42089

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

Count 40 40 40 0 0Sum 65 34 21 10.22 0.00632Min 40 40 40 0 0Max 65 32 23 9.78 0.007791Mean 65 34 21 10.22 0.00632RMS 65 26 29 9.42 0.00927Median 65 31.5 23.5 9.695 0.00811925 percentile 65 35.5 19.5 10.65 0.00514875 percentile 65 36 19 10.82 0.00477Skewness 15 54 51 9.42 0.00927Excess 65 29 26 9.42 0.00927Confidence interval

65 26 29 9.42 0.00927

Time entropy

60 29 31 6.02 0.04947

Entropy intervals

47.5 40 32.5 1.125 0.5698

Time fractality

24 57 39 5.46 0.06538

Fractality RMS

49 38 33 1.34 0.5118

53

Page 54: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Polynomial trend coefficients

Polynomial trend coefficient: K0

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

12.0

22.3

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 7.68605e-009

Polynomial trend coefficient: K1

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-0.10

0.04

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.0696446

54

Page 55: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Polynomial trend coefficient: K2

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-0.0004

0.0017

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.0973956

Polynomial trend coefficient: K3

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-0.000009

0.000001

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.0817616

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

K0 65 28 27 9.38 0.009446

55

Page 56: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

K1 26 56 38 4.56 0.1024K2 51 24 45 4.02 0.1341K3 26 57 37 4.94 0.08475

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Exponential trend coefficients

Exponential trend coefficient: A

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

13.006

23.318

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 1.33596e-009

Exponential trend coefficient: B

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-0.0017

-0.0002

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 0.00672018

56

Page 57: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Exponential trend coefficient: C

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-2

0

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.999976

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

A 65 31 24 9.62 0.008417B 19 59 42 8.06 0.018C 40 40 40 0 0

Statistical comparison of time series trends - Power trend coefficients

57

Page 58: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Power trend coefficient: A

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

13.79

29.03

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples are statistically dissimilar; p = 3.15515e-006

Power trend coefficient: B

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-0.13

-0.04

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 0.179899

58

Page 59: Detailed report of processing gdv images in the gdv scientific laboratory program 050709

Power trend coefficient: C

Ent

ropy

inte

rval

s co

unt

-1

1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

By ANOVA one way test samples have no statistically significant differences; p = 1

RankOfSample1

RankOfSample2

RankOfSample3

criterion p-value

A 65 26 29 9.42 0.00927B 28 55 37 3.78 0.1512C 40 40 40 0 0

59


Recommended