Registered Charity Number 207890
Accepted Manuscript
This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the RSC Publishing peer review process and has been accepted for publication.
Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, which is prior to technical editing, formatting and proof reading. This free service from RSC Publishing allows authors to make their results available to the community, in citable form, before publication of the edited article. This Accepted Manuscript will be replaced by the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as this is available.
To cite this manuscript please use its permanent Digital Object Identifier (DOI), which is identical for all formats of publication.
More information about Accepted Manuscripts can be found in the Information for Authors.
Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics contained in the manuscript submitted by the author(s) which may alter content, and that the standard Terms & Conditions and the ethical guidelines that apply to the journal are still applicable. In no event shall the RSC be held responsible for any errors or omissions in these Accepted Manuscript manuscripts or any consequences arising from the use of any information contained in them.
www.rsc.org/catalysis
Catalysis Science & Technology
ISSN 2044-4753
Volume 1 | N
umber x | 2010
MedC
hemCom
m
Pages 00000000
www.rsc.org/catalysis Volume 1 | Number 1 | 2011 | Pages 00010100
CatalysisScience&Technology
View Article OnlineView Journal
1
Design of Visible-Light Photocatalysts by Coupling of Narrow
Bandgap Semiconductors and TiO2: Effect of Their Relative Energy
Band Positions in Photocatalytic Efficiency
Sher Bahadur Rawal,a Sandipan Bera,
a Daeki Lee,
b Du-Jeon Jang
b and Wan In Lee*
a
Abstract
According to relative energy band positions between TiO2 and visible-light-absorbing
semiconductors, three different types of heterojunction were designed, and their visible-light
photocatalytic efficiencies were analyzed. In Type-A heterojunction, the conduction band (CB)
level of sensitizer is positioned more negative side than that of TiO2, whereas in Type-B system
its valence band (VB) level is more positive than that of TiO2 and in Type-C system the
sensitizer energy level is located between the CB and VB of TiO2. In evolving CO2 from the
gaseous 2-propanol (IP) under visible-light irradiation, the Type-B systems such as FeTiO3/TiO2,
Ag3PO4/TiO2, W18O49/TiO2, and Sb-doped SnO2 (ATO)/TiO2 demonstrated noticeably higher
photocatalytic efficiency than the Type-A such as CdS/TiO2 and CdSe/TiO2, while the Type-C
such as NiTiO3/TiO2, CoTiO3/TiO2, and Fe2O3/TiO2 did not show any appreciable improvement.
Remarkably high visible-light photocatalytic activity of Type-B heterojunction structures could
be explained by inter-semiconductor hole-transfer mechanism between the VB of sensitizer and
that of TiO2. The evidence for the hole-transport between sensitizer and TiO2 was also obtained
by monitoring the hole-scavenging reactions with iodide (I-) and 1,4-terephthalic acid (TA).
Keywords: Photocatalyst, Visible light, Heterojunction, Sensitizers, TiO2, 2-propanol, CO2
evolution.
Page 1 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
2
1. Introduction
Remediation of environmental pollutants by photocatalytic reaction has attracted extensive
attention for the last a few decades.1,2
TiO2 has been known as the most efficient photocatalyst
among various semiconductors,3-6
but it cannot utilize the photons in the visible-light range,
occupying major portion of solar spectrum due to its wide bandgap (Eg = 3.2 eV).7-11
Thus,
development of photocatalysts functional under visible-light will be a crucial issue.
Thus far, several strategies, including the substitution of various transition elements to the Ti
site,12-14
several anions such as N, C, B, and S to the oxygen site,15-18
and incorporation of
carbon nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene,19,20
have been attempted to
extend the band edge of TiO2 up to the visible-light range. Another promising strategy will be
coupling of TiO2 with other narrow bandgap semiconductors capable of harvesting the photons
in the visible range.21-24
Conceptually, according to the relative energy band location between the
sensitizer and TiO2, the heterojunction structures can be classified by the following three
different types.
First, as described in Scheme 1a, the conduction band (CB) of sensitizer is positioned more
negative side than that of TiO2 (denoted as Type-A heterojunction). For example, several metal
chalcogenide quantum dots or molecular dyes are loaded on the TiO2 surface to form Type-A
heterojunction.25-27
With visible-light irradiation to this system, the sensitizer is excited, and the
electrons are then transported to the CB of TiO2, since the CB level of TiO2 is lower than that of
the sensitizer. These electrons can induce various reduction reactions or participate in
decoloration reactions of organic dyes.28-30
Complete oxidation of organic pollutants is also
possible by forming the O2- and HO2, as shown in equation 1-3.30-32
O2 + e- O2
-, E0 = -0.284 V (vs. NHE) (1)
O2- + H
+ HO2, E0 = -0.046 V (vs. NHE) (2)
HO2 + Organic compounds CO2 + H2O (3)
Page 2 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
3
Second, as described in Scheme 1b, valence band (VB) of the sensitizer is located more
positive side than that of the TiO2 (Type-B heterojunction). With irradiation of visible-light to
this coupled system, the electrons in the sensitizer VB are excited to its CB. Thereby the holes in
the sensitizer VB can be transferred to that of TiO2. As a result, holes are generated in the VB of
TiO2 by inter-semiconductor hole-transfer mechanism,33-35
and in turn they initiate various
oxidation reactions by generating the OH radical on the TiO2 surface, as described in equation 4-5.36
(H2O)ads + h+ H
+ + OH (4)
(OH-)ads + h
+ OH (5)
Considering the powerful oxidative ability of the holes generated in the VB of TiO2, efficient and
complete decomposition of organic compounds could be achieved.
Third, as described in Scheme 1c, the CB and VB of sensitizer are located between those of the
TiO2 (Type-C heterojunction). Under visible light irradiation the electrons in the VB of sensitizer
are excited to its CB, but neither electrons in CB nor holes in VB of sensitizer can be transferred
to the CB or VB of TiO2, due to unfavorable energy band matching. Hence, no synergetic effect
enhancing visible-light photocatalytic activity is expected to this system.37
Thus far various coupled systems were investigated to design efficient visible-light
photocatalysts, but most of them were limited to the Type-A systems, and the other types were
scarcely studied. In the present study, various narrow bandgap semiconductors such as CdS,
CdSe, Sb-doped SnO2 (ATO), Ag3PO4, W18O49, FeTiO3, NiTiO3, CoTiO3 and Fe2O3 were
prepared, and they were coupled with TiO2 to form the Type-A, Type-B and Type-C
heterojunction structures, respectively. Correlation of the relative energy band positions between
sensitizer and TiO2 and the resultant visible-light photocatalytic activities have been
systematically investigated. We found that relative energy band positions are highly important in
Page 3 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
4
determining the visible-light photocatalytic activity. The obtained results will provide the
insights in designing highly efficient visible-light photocatalysts based on heterojunction
structures as well as in understanding the photocatalytic reaction mechanism.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Preparation of Type-A Heterojunction Structures (CdS/TiO2 or CdSe/TiO2)
CdS and CdSe quantum dots (QDs) were synthesized by the procedures reported in literature.38,39
In a typical syntheses, 0.1 mmol CdO (Aldrich), 1.2 mmol oleic acid (OA, Aldrich) (or 2.4 mmol
trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, Aldrich) for CdSe synthesis), and 3.0 ml 1-octadecene (ODE,
Aldrich) were mixed in a three-neck flask, and heated to 300oC under Ar flow. In a separate flask,
a solution of sulfur (0.05 mmol, Daejung Chem. Co.) in 1.91 ml ODE or 0.24 mmol selenium
(Aldrich) with 0.96 mmol trioctylphosphine (TOP, Aldrich) in ODE was prepared, and injected
swiftly to the hot solution. The temperature of the mixture was then adjusted to ~260C for the
growth of CdS or CdSe QDs. After 5 min, the solution was immediately cooled down by adding
the 30 ml cold toluene to obtain OA-capped CdS or TOPO-capped CdSe QDs.
The OA and TOPO groups on the CdS and CdSe surfaces, respectively, were exchanged to
mercapto propionate (MPA) group,33,40
in order to anchor the CdS and CdSe QDs onto the TiO2
surface. Typically, 0.2 mmol MPA (Aldrich) was dissolved in 10 mL anhydrous methanol, and
the pH was adjusted to 11.4 by adding tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH, Aldrich). 40
mg OA-capped CdS or TOPO-capped CdSe was then suspended in this solution, followed by
heating at 63C under dry Ar atmosphere for ~24 h. The formed MPA-capped CdS or CdSe QD
was precipitated by adding the mixture of ethyl acetate and diethyl ether (1:1 in volume). The
collected precipitate was washed several times with ethyl acetate to remove residual MPA, OA
or TOPO.
To anchor the CdS or CdSe QDs onto TiO2 surface, 50 ml ethanol solution containing 0.5 g
TiO2 and the stoichiometric amount of the MPA-capped CdS (or CdSe) was magnetically stirred
at 60oC for 6 h. The prepared CdS/TiO2, or CdSe/TiO2 (Type-A heterojunctions) suspended in
Page 4 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
5
the solution were then precipitated by centrifugation, and the collected powders were
subsequently annealed at 250oC for 3 h.
2.2. Preparation of Type-B and Type-C Heterojunction Structures
Antimony doped tin oxide (ATO), Ag3PO4, W18O49, FeTiO3, NiTiO3, CoTiO3, and Fe2O3
particles were prepared by the procedures reported in the literatures.33-44
10 mol% Sb-doped
SnO2 was prepared by co-precipitation of SnCl45H2O and SbCl3, followed by post heat
treatment method.33
FeTiO3 nanodisc was synthesized by the hydrothermal reaction of FeSO47H2O, KOH, titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP, Aldrich) stabilized in aqueous solution of
tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAH, Aldrich) at 220oC.
34 Ag3PO4 nanoparticle (NP) was
synthesized by ion-exchange reaction between AgNO3 and Na3PO4 in solid phase.41
W18O49
nanorods were synthesized by heating the reaction mixture of WCl4, oleic acid and oleylamine at
350oC under argon environment.
42 NiTiO3 (or CoTiO3) particle was prepared by co-precipitation
of nickel acetate (or cobalt acetate), titanium(IV) butoxide (Aldrich) and citric acid, followed by
subsequent heat treatment method.43
Fe2O3 NP was synthesized by a hydrothermal reaction of
FeCl36H2O stabilized in 25/75 ammonia/water solution at 180oC.
44
For the formation of Type-B or Type-C heterojunction, 3.67 g titanium isopropoxide (97%,
Aldrich) was stabilized in the mixed solution of 40 ml ethanol, 1 ml concentrated nitric acid, and
1 ml water, and the mixture was then gently stirred for 1 h. Stoichiometric amount of each
sensitizer particle was added to this solution. For example, to obtain 5/95 ATO/TiO2 (in wt%
ratio), 53 mg ATO particle was added and gently stirred overnight. The amorphous titania-coated
samples were then dried at 80oC for 24 h, and subsequently heat treated at 300
oC for 3 h to
crystallize the TiO2. As a blank sample, bare TiO2 was prepared by the same procedure without
adding the sensitizer particle.
2.3. Characterizations
Page 5 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
6
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained for the heterojunction composite powder
samples by using a Rigaku Multiflex diffractometer with monochromatic light-intensity Cu K
radiation. XRD scanning was performed under ambient conditions over 2 region of 2070o
at a
rate of 2o/min (40 kV, 20mA). UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra were acquired by a Perkin-
Elmer Lambda 40 spectrophotometer. BaSO4 was used as the reflectance standard. Field
emission transmission electron microscope (FE-TEM) images were obtained by a JEOL
JEM2100F operated at 200 kV. One milligram of the synthesized particles was dispersed in 50
mL of ethanol, and a drop of the suspension was then spread on a holey amorphous carbon film
deposited on the copper grid.45
2.4. Evaluation of photocatalytic activity
The visible-light photocatalytic efficiencies of the photocatalytic samples were estimated by
monitoring the evolved amount of CO2 by decomposing 2-propanol (IP) in gas phase. An
aqueous suspension containing 8.0 mg of photocatalytic sample was spread on a 2.52.5 cm2
Pyrex glass in a film form and subsequently dried at room temperature. The gas reactor system
used for this photocatalytic activity has been described elsewhere.45
The net volume of the gas-
tight reactor was 200 mL, and the photocatalytic film was located at the center of the reactor. The
entire area of the photocatalytic film (2.5 cm2.5 cm) was irradiated by a 300 W Xe lamp
through a UV cut-off filter (
7
condition, the IP and H2O remained in the vapor phase. After a certain irradiation interval, 0.5
mL of the gas in the reactor was automatically picked up and sent to a gas chromatograph
(Agilent Technologies, Model 6890N) using an auto sampling valve system. For CO2 detection, a
methanizer was installed between the GC column outlet and the FID detector.
3. Results and discussion
The X-ray diffraction patterns in Fig. 1a indicate that the prepared CdS and CdSe QDs are in
the cubic (JCPDS, No. 75-0581) and hexagonal (JCPDS, No. 88-2346) phases, respectively, with
no impurity peaks. The average crystallite sizes of CdS and CdSe QDs, as determined from the
corresponding (111) peaks by applying Scherrer equation, were 3.8 and 5.5 nm, respectively. Fig.
2a shows the UV-vis diffuse absorbance spectra of CdS and CdSe QDs loaded on the TiO2
particles. The absorption edge of CdS and CdSe QDs appeared at ~500 and ~660 nm,
respectively, exhibiting the capability of sensitizing the visible-light.
Antimony doped tin oxide (Sn0.9Sb0.1O2, ATO), Ag3PO4, W18O49, and FeTiO3 particles were
prepared by the procedures reported in the literature.33,34,41,42
X-ray diffraction patterns in Fig. 1b
confirm that the prepared sensitizers are in the pure phase. The average crystallite size of ATO,
Ag3PO4, W18O49, and FeTiO3 particles, as determined from the (110) peak of ATO, (210) peak
of Ag3PO4, (010) peak of W18O49 and (104) peak of FeTiO3 by applying Scherrer equation, were
49 nm, 62 nm, 43 nm and 46 nm, respectively, clearly indicating their high crystallinity. UV-vis
diffuse absorbance spectra of the prepared sensitizers are shown in Fig. 2b. Ag3PO4 reveals an
absorption band edge at ~560 nm, whereas ATO, W18O49, and FeTiO3 exhibited profound
absorbance in the entire visible region. The NiTiO3, CoTiO3, and Fe2O3 particles were also
prepared by the reported methods in the literature.43,44
The prepared samples were in the pure
phase with high crystallinity, as shown in the XRD patterns in Fig. 1c. UV-vis diffuse
absorbance spectra in Fig. 2c indicate that the prepared NiTiO3, CoTiO3, and Fe2O3 particles also
exhibit profound absorption in the visible region. NiTiO3 showed the absorption edges at ~550
nm and ~410 nm, caused by the transition of Ni2+
Ti4+
and O2-
Ti4+
,43
respectively. CoTiO3
Page 7 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
8
revealed a broad absorption peak at ~610 nm with the absorption band edges at ~670 nm and
~490 nm, respectively, inherent from the transition of Co2+
Ti4+
and O2-
Ti4+
.43
Fe2O3
powder with a bandgap of 2.20 eV displays an absorption band edge at ~610 nm.
Table 1 illustrates the CB and VB energy levels and the bandgaps of the synthesized
sensitizers reported in the literatures.46-50
Herein we also calculated the bandgaps of these
sensitizers from the Kubelka Munk (KM) or Tauc plots versus wavelength. The determined
values, shown in Fig. S1 and S2, were quite close to the reported ones. The sensitizers were
categorized as Sensitizer-A (Sen-A), Sensitizer-B (Sen-B), and Sensitizer-C (Sen-C), according
to their energy band positions relative to those of TiO2. Considering that the CB and VB levels of
TiO2 at pH 7 are -0.5 and +2.7 V (vs. NHE), respectively, CdS and CdSe are classified to Sen-A,
whereas FeTiO3, Ag3PO4, W18O49, and ATO belong to Sen-B, and Fe2O3, CoTiO3 and NiTiO3
belong to Sen-C. Each sensitizer was then coupled with TiO2 to form the three different types of
heterojunctions, categorized as Type-A, Type-B, and Type-C. As shown in Scheme 2a, a few
nanometer-sized Sen-A QDs were loaded on the surface TiO2 (Degussa P25) to form Type-A
heterojunction. In order to form Type-B or Type-C heterojunction, relatively large Sen-B or Sen-
C particles were fully covered with TiO2, as described in Scheme 2b.
Fig. 3 shows the TEM images of the Type-A heterojunction structures prepared by anchoring
the MPA capped CdS or CdSe QDs onto the surface of Degussa P25. The images in Fig. 3a and
3b shows the 2/98 CdS/TiO2 and 1/99 CdSe/TiO2 (both are in molar ratio), respectively, clearly
indicating that the individual CdS and CdSe QDs with a size of ~4 and ~5 nm, respectively, are
attached on the TiO2 surface. The dotted rectangular part in Fig. 3a was further magnified, as
shown in the inset. The d-spacing of 0.335 nm was identified to be the (111) plane of CdS. Fig. 4
shows the TEM images of the Type-B heterojunction structures prepared by sol-gel method in
depositing the TiO2 on the surface of large sensitizer particles. TEM images in Fig. 4a, 4c, 4e
and 4f show the 5/95 ATO/TiO2, 7/93 W18O49/TiO2, 3/97 Ag3PO4/TiO2, and 5/95 FeTiO3/TiO2
(all are in wt% ratio), respectively. It is clear that large sensitizer particles are located in the core
and their surfaces are fully covered by small TiO2 grains. The high resolution TEM images were
Page 8 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
9
also obtained for the dotted rectangular parts of Fig. 4a and 4c. Their characteristic fringe
patterns, as shown in Fig. 4b and 4d, certify the presence of crystallized ATO and W18O49,
respectively, in the 5/95 ATO/TiO2 and 7/93 W18O49/TiO2 composites. Type-C heterojunction
structures were also prepared by the same sol-gel method. TEM images of the 3/97 NiTiO3/TiO2,
3/97 CoTiO3/TiO2, and 3/97 Fe2O3/TiO2 (all are in wt% ratio) are shown in Fig. 5a-c, revealing
that the large Sen-C particles are fully covered with TiO2. High resolution TEM image of 3/97
Fe2O3/TiO2 in Fig. 5d showed the fringe patterns, identified to be the (110) plane of Fe2O3 and
(101) of TiO2.
Photocatalytic efficiencies of three different heterojunction structures, that is, Type-A
(CdS/TiO2, and CdSe/TiO2), Type-B (ATO/TiO2, Ag3PO4/TiO2, W18O49/TiO2, and FeTiO3/TiO2),
and Type-C (NiTiO3/TiO2, CoTiO3/TiO2, and Fe2O3/TiO2) were evaluated by monitoring the
decomposition of 2-propanol (IP) in gas phase under visible-light irradiation (422nm). The
amount of CO2 evolved in 2 h was monitored to evaluate the photocatalytic activity of each
system. More detailed photocatalytic data for the individual heterojunction structures are shown
in Fig. S3. First, as shown in Fig. 6a, the Type-A systems exhibited considerably higher catalytic
activity than the bare TiO2. The amounts of evolved CO2 with 2/98 CdS/TiO2 and 1/99
CdSe/TiO2 (both are in molar ratio) were 4.3 and 3.1 ppm, respectively, whereas that with the
bare TiO2 was only 0.95 ppm and those with the pure CdS and CdSe were 0.65 and 0.80 ppm,
respectively.
Second, visible-light photocatalytic activities of the Type-B systems were illustrated in Fig. 6b.
The amount of CO2 evolved in 2 h was remarkably enhanced for all Type-B systems. The
optimum ratios between the sensitizer and TiO2, with respect to photocatalytic efficiency, were
determined to be 5/95 for ATO/TiO2, 3/97 for Ag3PO4/TiO2, 7/93 for W18O49/TiO2, and 5/95 for
FeTiO3/TiO2 (all are in wt% ratio). As shown in Fig. 6b, the amounts of CO2 evolved in 2 h with
ATO/TiO2, Ag3PO4/TiO2, W18O49/TiO2, and FeTiO3/TiO2 were 8.3, 11.8, 6.8, and 8.1 ppm,
respectively.
Third, visible-light photocatalytic activities of the 3/97 NiTiO3/TiO2, 3/97 CoTiO3/TiO2, and
Page 9 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
10
3/97 Fe2O3/TiO2 (all are in wt% ratio), classified as Type-C heterojunction, were also examined.
As shown in Fig. 6c, the amounts of CO2 evolved in 2 h for the NiTiO3/TiO2, CoTiO3/TiO2, and
Fe2O3/TiO2 were 0.85, 0.88, 0.96 ppm, respectively, indicating that the coupling of Type-C
sensitizer with TiO2 did not induce appreciable enhancement in photocatalytic activity.
Recently, Kubacka et al. reported that the photocatalytic activities of the coupled systems are
influenced by the size of sensitizer, due to the energy band modification by the quantum size
effect.51
However, the particle sizes of the metal oxides prepared in this work were in the range
of 4070 nm, which does not offer any quantum size effect. Thus the sizes of sensitizers in these
ranges would not be critical in determining the catalytic activity. From the observed trends in the
visible-light photocatalytic activities of the Type-B and Type-C heterojunctions, it is obvious that
relative energy band position between the sensitizer and TiO2 is a crucial factor. Hence, in
designing efficient catalytic system based on heterojunction structure, the transport of electrons
or holes from the sensitizer to TiO2 is regarded to be the most important issue, since the
electron/hole pairs are generated in the sensitizer and the catalytic sites are formed on the TiO2
surface.
In the Type-B heterojunction, the electrons in the sensitizer VB are excited to its CB under
visible-light irradiation. The generated holes in the sensitizer VB will be transported voluntarily
to that of TiO2. By this inter-semiconductor hole-transport mechanism, holes are generated on
the TiO2 VB, followed by formation of OH radicals through the equation 4-5. Hence, the
generated OH radicals can completely decompose the organic compounds to CO2 and H2O.
For the case of Type-C heterojunction, the electrons in the sensitizer VB are excited to its CB
under visible-light irradiation, but the photogenerated electrons and holes cannot be transported
to TiO2 CB and VB, respectively, since the sensitizers energy levels lies in between the CB and
VB of TiO2. Thus the coupling of these two semiconductors will not bring any synergetic effect
in charge separations. As a result, NiTiO3/TiO2, CoTiO3/TiO2, and Fe2O3/TiO2, belonging to
Type-C heterojunction, did not show appreciable visible-light photocatalytic activity.
In the Type-A heterojunction system, sensitizers are excited under visible-light irradiation,
Page 10 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
11
followed by the transportation of the photogenerated electrons to TiO2 CB. As described in
equations 1-3, the electrons in the TiO2 CB are transferred to O2 to form O2- radicals, and further
converted to HO2 by reacting with proton. Even though HO2 is not as strong as OH in
oxidation ability, it is able to induce the complete mineralization of organic compounds.30,46
This
explains why CdS/TiO2 and CdSe/TiO2 systems showed considerably enhanced visible-light
photocatalytic activities, compared with the bare TiO2.
Herein it was found that Type-B heterojunction systems exhibited relatively higher catalytic
activity than the Type-A systems. Moreover, some of the Type-B systems showed comparable or
even higher activity than the typical N-doped TiO2. Basically, direct comparison of activity
among the different photocatalytic systems is not simple, since the several factors such as
particle size of sensitizer, contact and charge transport between sensitizer and TiO2, and others,
are involved in determining the photocatyalytic activity. Nonetheless, Type-B systems seem to
have a significant advantage in photocatalytic oxidation reactions due to the availability of OH
radicals in the TiO2 VB. The produced OH radicals, known as the most powerful oxidant, can
induce fast and complete decomposition of organic pollutants, rationalizing the enhanced
photocatalytic efficiency of Type-B systems.
In order to confirm the hole-transfer mechanism between the VB of sensitizer and TiO2 in the
Type-B heterojunction, the evidence for the generation of holes in TiO2 VB was investigated by
monitoring the chemical reaction of the iodide ion (I-), known as a hole scavenger. As a Type-B
heterojunction system, ATO/TiO2 was used in this experiment. Generally, I-/I3- redox couple has
been used as electrolyte mediating the charges in the dye-sensitized solar cells, and the role of I-
ions is accepting the holes from the HOMO of dye.52,53
Therefore, it is deduced that the I- ions
can be oxidized to triiodide (I3-) by reacting with the generated holes in the ATO or TiO2, as
shown in equation 7, since the redox potential of I-/I3- is +0.536 V,
54 which lies much higher
than the VB position of ATO (+3.6 V)33
or TiO2 (+2.7 V).46
2h+(VB) + 3I
-(aq) I3
-(aq) (7)
Page 11 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
12
40 mL KI (0.01 M) solution containing ATO, ATO/TiO2 or TiO2 (20 mg each) was irradiated
for 2 h under visible-light (422nm). Then the I3-
formed in the solution could be identified
from its characteristic absorption peak at 286 nm and 345 nm. Fig. 7 showed the UVvis
absorption spectra of KI solution, after the photocatalytic reaction with ATO, ATO/TiO2 and TiO2.
First, pure 0.01 M KI solution, after visible-light irradiation for 2h, did not show any
characteristic absorption peak in 250-500 nm range. Second, when KI solution was irradiated in
presence of the bare ATO, interestingly, there was no characteristic absorption peak of I3-,
indicating that the bare ATO cannot oxidize I- under visible-light irradiation. In case of pure ATO,
electron and hole pairs will be generated in its CB and VB, respectively, but the holes generated
in ATO did not seem to be consumed for the formation of I3-, presumably due to the faster
electron-hole recombination than the reaction between the hole and I-. Third, when KI solution
was irradiated in presence of the bare TiO2 under visible-light, there was no characteristic
absorption peak of I3-, but under UV light strong absorption peaks appeared at 286 nm and 345
nm, indicating the presence of I3-. It is deduced that the TiO2 itself cannot be excited by visible-
light due to its wide band gap but that the generated holes in the VB by UV-light can induce the
formation of I3-, as described in equation 7. Fourth, when the KI solution was irradiated in
presence of the ATO/TiO2, noticeably, the characteristic absorption peak of I3- was observed (Fig.
7), indicating that the holes are generated in the TiO2 VB. Therefore, the obtained result strongly
supports that the visible-light photocatalytic activity of Type-B heterojunction systems originates
from the inter-semiconductor hole-transport.
The presence of OH radicals on the ATO/TiO2 surface during the visible-light irradiation
was also monitored in order to support the hole transfer mechanism.55,56
That is, 20 mg of ATO,
TiO2 or ATO/TiO2 was suspended in 60 mL aqueous solution containing 0.01 M NaOH and 3
mM 1,4-terephthalic acid (TA). Before exposure to visible-light, the suspension was stirred in
dark for 30 min. Then, 5 mL of the solution was taken after every 1 h for the fluorescence
measurements. It is known that OH radical reacts with TA in basic solution and generates 2-
Page 12 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
13
hydroxy terephthalic acid (TAOH), which emits the unique fluorescence peak at 426 nm.56
Bare
ATO as well as TiO2, suspended in TA solution, did not show any appreciable fluorescence peaks
upon visible-light (422 nm) irradiation, as shown in Fig. 8a and 8b, suggesting that bare TiO2
or ATO cannot produce holes nor utilize them in producing OH radicals. Contrarily, the
ATO/TiO2 shows the characteristic fluorescence peak, and its intensity was increased with elapse
of irradiation time, as shown in Fig. 8c. This clearly indicates that the holes are formed at the
TiO2 side and they were transported from the ATO by the inter-semiconductor hole-transport
mechanism.
For the Fe2O3/TiO2 system, we also performed the OH radical test using TA in order to
check the possibility of hole-transfer between Fe2O3 and TiO2. Fig. 9 shows the fluorescence
spectra of TAOH for the suspensions with TiO2, Fe2O3/TiO2, and Fe2O3, after 2 h irradiation of
visible-light. It was found that the fluorescence peaks of the TAOH with the bare Fe2O3 and
Fe2O3/TiO2 were not appreciably different, suggesting that the hole transport from Fe2O3 to TiO2
was blocked in the Fe2O3/TiO2 system. The obtained result rationalize the reason for the low
catalytic efficiency of Type-C systems including Fe2O3/TiO2.
In order for the Type-B system to be efficient catalyst, the excited electrons in the CB of
sensitizer have to be scavenged. Considering the CB level of the sensitizer, direct electron
transfer to the oxygen molecules, requiring -0.284 V (vs. NHE), will be difficult in general
(equation 1).34
Thus it is considered that the electrons in the sensitizer CB are transported to the
oxygen species through the processes described in equation 8 and 9.54,57,58
O2 + H+ + e- HO2, E0 = -0.046 V (8)
O2 + 2H+ + 2e- H2O2, E0 = +0.682 V (9)
The visible-light catalytic activity of Type-B systems, achieved in the present work, is
comparable or even higher than that of N-doped TiO2, which are well-known visible-light
photocatalyst, but we believe that the catalytic activity can be enhanced much more, if the
Page 13 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
14
appropriate sensitizers are developed and the interface control between the sensitizer and TiO2
are optimized for the efficient hole-transport. In this regards, several properties will be required
to the sensitizers for the design of efficient Type-B systems. The VB level of sensitizer has to be
sufficiently lower than that of TiO2, and the inherent hole-transport from sensitizer to TiO2 have
to be efficient and fast with less charge recombination. Small band gap will be favorable for
utilization of visible-light, but its CB level needs to be high enough for effective scavenging of
the electrons in its CB.
4. Conclusions
Nine heterojunction systems (CdS/TiO2, CdSe/TiO2, FeTiO3/TiO2, Ag3PO4/TiO2, W18O49/TiO2,
ATO/TiO2, NiTiO3/TiO2, CoTiO3/TiO2, and Fe2O3/TiO2) were fabricated, and they were
classified to three types, according to the relative energy band positions between sensitizer and
TiO2. Among them Type-B systems such as FeTiO3/TiO2, Ag3PO4/TiO2, W18O49/TiO2, and
ATO/TiO2 exhibited relatively higher visible-light photocatalytic activity in evolving CO2 from
the gaseous IP under visible-light irradiation. Especially, Ag3PO4/TiO2 showed significantly
higher catalytic efficiency than the typical N-doped TiO2. It is deduced that higher photocatalytic
activities of Type-B systems originates from the inter-semiconductor hole-transport. That is, the
generated holes in the sensitizer VB is transported to that of TiO2, resultantly inducing the
formation of OH radicals. The evidence for the hole-transport between sensitizer and TiO2 was
also investigated by monitoring the reaction with iodide (I-). By irradiating visible-light in
presence of ATO/TiO2, it was found that I- was converted to I3
-, clearly indicating that the holes
are generated in the TiO2 VB. It was also found that ATO/TiO2 system can convert the TA to
TAOH, which is evident for the formation of OH radicals in TiO2 side under visible-light
irradiation.
Acknowledgments
Page 14 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
15
This work has been supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Project No. 2011-
0002995), and Korean Center for Artificial Photosynthesis (KCAP) funded by the Ministry of
Education, Science, and Technology (NRF-2011-C1AAA001-2011-0030278).
Notes and References
aDepartment of Chemistry, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Republic of Korea
Fax: +82-32-867-5604; Tel: +82-32-863-1026; E-mail: [email protected]
bSchool of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Republic of Korea
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [Detailed photocatalytic activities,
bandgaps, and PL spectra]. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
1. T. Inoue, A. Fujishima, S. Konishi, K. Honda, Nature, 1979, 277, 637.
2. M. R. Hoffmann, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 69.
3. E. S. Jang, J. H. Won, S. J. Hwang, J. H. Choy, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 3309.
4. Z. Ding, G. Q. Lu, P. F. Greenfield, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 4815.
5. Y. Ou, J. Lin, S. Fang, D. Liao, Catal. Comm. 2007, 8, 936.
6. Y. Huang, Z. Zheng, Z. Ai, L. Zhang, X. Fan, Z. Zou, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 19323.
7. C. Burda, Y. Lou, X. Chen, A. C. S. Samia, J. Stout, J. L. Gole, Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1049.
8. V. Stengl, V. Houskova, S. Bakardjieva, N. Murafa, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces., 2010, 2,
575.
9. S. Sakthivel, H. Kisch, Chem. Phys. Chem., 2003, 4, 487.
10. K. Y. Song, M. K. Park, Y. T. Kwon, H. W. Lee, W. J. Chung, W. I. Lee, Chem. Mater.
2001, 13, 2349.
11. L.-L. Tan, S.-P. Chai, A. R. Mohamed, ChemSusChem., 2012, 5, 1868.
12. M. Anpo, M. Takeuchi, J. Catal. 2003, 216, 505.
13. B. K. Vijayan, N. M. Dimitrijevic, J. Wu, K. A. Gray, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 21262.
Page 15 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
16
14. P. Bouras, E. Stathatos, P. Lianos, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2007, 73, 51.
15. R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, Y. Taga, Science, 2001, 293, 269.
16. S. U. M. Khan, M. Al-Shahry, W. B. Ingler, Science, 2002, 297, 2243.
17. W. Zhao, W. Ma, C. Chen, J. Zhao, Z. Shuai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 4782.
18. J. C. Yu, W. Ho, J. Yu, H. Yip, P. K. Wong, J. Zhao, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39,
1175.
19. W. J. Ong, M. M. Gui, S. P. Chai, A. R. Mohamed, RSC Advances, 2013, 3, 4505.
20. Y. Zhang, N. Zhang, Z. R. Tang, Y. J. Xu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 9167.
21. D. Liu, P. V. Kamat, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1993, 347, 451.
22. L. Spanhel, H. Weller, A. Henglein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 6632.
23. S. Y. Chai, Y. J. Kim, M. H. Jung, A. K. Chakraborty, D. Jung, W. I. Lee, J. Catal., 2009,
262, 144.
24. S. B. Rawal, S. D. Sung, W. I. Lee, Catal. Commun., 2012, 17, 131.
25. S. N. Frank, A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem., 1977, 81, 1484.
26. W. Ho, J. C. Yu, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2006, 247, 268.
27. E. Bae, W. Choi, J. Park, H. S. Shin, S. B. Kim, J. S. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108,
14093.
28. X. Yu, Q. Wu, S. Jiang, Y. Guo, Mater. Charact., 2006, 57, 333.
29. J. C. Kim, J. K. Choi, Y. B. Lee, J. H. Hong, J. I. Lee, J. W. Yang, W. I. Lee, N. H. Hur,
Chem. Commun., 2006, 5024.
30. Y. Bessekhouad, N. Chaoui, M. Trzpit, N. Ghazzal, D. Robert, J. V. Weber, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. A: Chem., 2006, 183, 218.
31. A. G. Agrios, P. Pichat, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2005, 35, 655.
32. U. I. Gaya, A. H. Abdullah, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C, 2008, 9, 1.
33. S. B. Rawal, A. K. Chakraborty, Y. J. Kim, H. J. Kim, W. I. Lee, RSC Advances, 2012, 2,
622.
Page 16 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
17
34. Y. J. Kim, B. Gao, S. Y. Han, M. H. Jung, A. K. Chakraborty, T. Ko, C. Lee, W. I. Lee, J.
Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 19179.
35. S. Shamaila, A. K. L. Sajjad, F. Chen, J. Zhang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2011, 356, 465.
36. H. Gnaser, M. R. Savina, W. F. Chalaway, C. E. Tripa, I. V. Veryovkin, M. J. Pellin, Int. J.
Mass Spectrom., 2005, 245, 61.
37. B. Gao, Y. J. Kim, A. K. Chakraborty, W. I. Lee, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 2008, 83, 202.
38. W. W. Yu, X. Peng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2368.
39. Q. Dai, D. Li, H. Chen, S. Kan, H. Li, S. Gao, Y. Hou, B. Liu, G. Zou, J. Phys. Chem. B,
2006, 110, 16509.
40. K. S. Leschkies, R. Divakar, J. Basu, E. E. Pommer, J. E. Boercker, C. B. Carter, U. R.
Kortshagen, D. J. Norris, E. S. Aydil, Nano Lett., 2007, 7, 1793.
41. Z. Yi, J. Ye, N. Kikugawa, T. Kako, S. Ouyang, H. S. Williams, H. Yang, J. Cao, W. Luo, Z.
Li, Y. Liu, R. L. Withers, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 559.
42. J. W. Seo, Y. W. Jun, S. J. Ko, J. W. Cheon, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 5389.
43. Y. J. Lin, Y. H. Chang, W. D. Yang, B. S. Tsai, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2006, 352, 789.
44. J. Ma, J. Lian, X. Duan, X. Liu, W. Zheng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 10671.
45. Y. T. Kwon, K. Y. Song, W. I. Lee, G. J. Choi, Y. R. Do, J. Catal., 2000, 191, 192.
46. N. Serpone, P. Maruthamuthu, P. Pichat, E. Pelizzetti, H. Hidaka, J. Photochem. Photobiol.
A: Chem., 1995, 85, 247.
47. P. V. Kamat, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 207.
48. Y. Xu, A. A. Schoonen, Am. Mineral., 2000, 85, 543.
49. S. B. Rawal, S. Bera, W. I. Lee, Catal. Lett., 2012, 142, 1482.
50. Z. Q. Li, Y. L. Yin, X. D. Liu, L. Y. Li, H. Liu, Q. G. Song, J. Appl. Phys., 2009, 106,
083701.
51. A. Kubacka, M. Fernndez-Garca, G. Coln, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1555.
52. M. Gratzel, Nature, 2001, 414, 338.
Page 17 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
18
53. M. Wang, N. Chamberland, L. Breau, J.E. Moser, R. H. Baker, B. Marsan, S.M.
Zakeeruddin, M. Gratzel, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 385.
54. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 77th ed.; Weast, C. R., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton,
FL, 1996.
55. T. Hirakawa, Y. Nosaka, Langmuir, 2002, 18, 3247.
56. G. Liu, C. Sun, L. Cheng, Y. Jin, H. Lu, L. Wang, S. C. Smith, G. Q. Lu, H. M. Cheng, J.
Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 12317.
57. A. B. Anderson, T. V. Albu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 11855.
58. H. Irie, S. Miura, K. Kamiya, K. Hashimoto, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2008, 457, 202.
Table 1. CB and VB potential levels (vs. NHE) and bandgaps of various visible-light-absorbing
semiconductors measured at pH 7.44-48
Sensitizers Type CB (V) VB (V) Eg (eV)
CdS A -0.85 +1.55 2.40
CdSe A -0.60 +1.10 1.70
Ag3PO4 B +0.45 +2.90 2.45
ATO B +0.95 +3.60 2.55
W18O49 B +0.61 +3.21 2.60
FeTiO3 B +0.20 +3.00 2.80
CoTiO3 C +0.14 +2.39 2.25
NiTiO3 C +0.20 +2.38 2.18
Fe2O3 C +0.28 +2.48 2.20
TiO2 -- -0.50 +2.70 3.20
Page 18 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
19
FIGURE CAPTIONS
Scheme 1. Schematic diagrams of the photo-induced charge flow under visible-light irradiation
for Type-A (a), Type-B (b), and Type-C (c) heterojunction structures.
Scheme 2. Schematic diagrams describing the preparation method for Type-A (a) and Type-B or
Type-C (b) heterojunction structures.
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns for the sensitizers belonging to Sen-A (a), Sen-B (b), and Sen-C
(c).
Fig. 2. UV-vis diffuse absorbance spectra for the sensitizers belonging to Sen-A (a), Sen-B (b),
and Sen-C (c).
Fig. 3. TEM images of CdS/TiO2 (a) and CdSe/TiO2 (b). High resolution (HR) image is shown in
the inset of (a), obtained from the dotted rectangular parts in (a).
Fig. 4. TEM images of ATO/TiO2 (a), W18O49/TiO2 (c), Ag3PO4/TiO2 (e), and FeTiO3/TiO2 (f).
HR-TEM images of ATO/TiO2 (b) and W18O49/TiO2 (d) obtained from the dotted rectangular
parts in (a) and (c), respectively.
Fig. 5. TEM images of NiTiO3/TiO2 (a), CoTiO3/TiO2 (b), and Fe2O3/TiO2 (c). HR-TEM image
of Fe2O3/TiO2 (d) obtained from the dotted rectangular parts in (a).
Fig. 6. Visible-light photocatalytic activities of several Type-A (a), Type-B (b), and Type-C (c)
heterojunction structures. The amounts of CO2 evolved under visible-light irradiation in 2 h were
Page 19 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
20
monitored.
Fig. 7. UV-vis spectra of 0.01 M KI aqueous solution in presence of several catalytic systems
after visible-light (422nm) or UV light irradiation for 2 h.
Fig. 8. Fluorescence spectra measured for visible-light (310540 nm) irradiated bare TiO2 (a),
ATO/TiO2 (b), and ATO (c) suspensions in 3 mM TA. Wavelength of the excitation light for
obtaining the fluorescence spectra was 320 nm.
Fig. 9. Fluorescence spectra of TAOH for the 3 mM TA suspensions with TiO2, Fe2O3/TiO2, and
Fe2O3 after 2 h irradiation of visible-light. Wavelength of the excitation light for obtaining the
fluorescence spectra was 320 nm.
Page 20 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
+2.7 V
TiO2
(a)
Sen-A
-0.5 V
e
Visible
light
e
h+
CB
VB
(b)
Visible
light
Sen-B TiO2
h+
h+
CB
VB
e
-0.5 V
+2.7 V
Visible
light
Sen-C TiO2
e
h+
CB
VB x
(c)
+2.7 V
-0.5 V x
Scheme 1. Schematic diagrams of the photo-induced charge flow under
visible-light irradiation for Type-A (a), Type-B (b), and Type-C (c)
heterojunction structures.
Page 21 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
Dry, 60oC
MPA-capped Sen-A Type-A TiO2 NP
(a)
+ Heat, 250oC
(b)
Sen-B or Sen-C
Ti-sol + Dry, 80oC Heat, 300oC
Type-B or Type-C
Scheme 2. Schematic diagrams describing the preparation method for Type-A
(a) and Type-B or Type-C (b) heterojunction structures.
Page 22 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
ATO
FeTiO3
Ag3PO
4
W18
O49
40
0
32
1
32
0
22
2
31
0
22
0
21
1
21
0
20
0
11
0
30
01
24
01
8
11
6
02
4
11
3
11
010
4
01
2
02
0
01
0
31
0
00
2
22
0
21
1
21
0
11
120
0
10
1
(b)
Inte
ns
ity
(A
.U.)
11
0
20 30 40 50 60
02
4
00
6
30
02
14
01
811
6
02
4
11
311
0
10
4
01
2
Fe2O
3
CoTiO3
NiTiO3
(c)
Two Theta (Degree)
01
2
10
4
11
0
11
3 11
6
01
8 12
43
00
20
2
11
0
12
1
11
0
12
0
22
0
23
1
23
3
13
02
11
CdSe
CdS
31
122
0
(a)
11
11
11
22
0
31
1
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns for the sensitizers belonging to Sen-A (a), Sen-
B (b), and Sen-C (c).
Page 23 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
CdS
CdSe
(a)
Ag3PO
4
ATO
W18
O49
FeTiO3
(b)
Ab
so
rba
nc
e (
A.U
.)
400 500 600 700 800 900
NiTiO3
CoTiO3
Fe2O
3
Wavelength (nm)
(c)
Fig. 2. UV-vis diffuse absorbance spectra for the sensitizers belonging to Sen-A (a),
Sen-B (b), and Sen-C (c).
Page 24 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
1 0 0 n m1 0 0 n m 30 nm
(a)
TiO2
20 nm CdSe
(b)
Fig. 3. TEM images of CdS/TiO2 (a) and CdSe/TiO2 (b). High resolution (HR) image
is shown in the inset of (a), obtained from the dotted rectangular parts in (a).
Page 25 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
Fig. 4. TEM images of ATO/TiO2 (a), W18O49/TiO2 (c), Ag3PO4/TiO2 (e), and
FeTiO3/TiO2 (f). HR-TEM images of ATO/TiO2 (b) and W18O49/TiO2 (d) obtained
from the dotted rectangular parts in (a) and (c), respectively.
(b)
50 nm50 nm50 nm
(a)
(d)
TiO2
Ag3PO4
TiO2
(e)
TiO2
FeTiO3
(f)
20 nm
TiO2
TiO2
(c)
Page 26 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
Fig. 5. TEM images of NiTiO3/TiO2 (a), CoTiO3/TiO2 (b), and Fe2O3/TiO2 (c). HR-
TEM image of Fe2O3/TiO2 (d) obtained from the dotted rectangular parts in (a).
100 nm100 nm50 nm
Fe2O3
TiO2
(c)
2 nm2 nm
(d)
10 nm10 nm
TiO2
CoTiO3
20 nm
(b)
TiO2 NiTiO3
50 nm
(a)
Page 27 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
03
6
9
12
N-d
op
ed
TiO
2
Fe
TiO
3/T
iO2
W1
8O
49/T
iO2
Ag
3P
O4/T
iO2
AT
O/T
iO2
TiO
2
(b)
Ev
olv
ed
CO
2 (
pp
m)
0
3
6
9
12
TiO
2
Fe
2O
3/T
iO2
Co
TiO
3/T
iO2
NiT
iO3/T
iO2
(c)
Ev
olv
ed
CO
2 (
pp
m)
0
3
6
9
12
Cd
Se
Cd
S
Cd
Se/T
iO2
Cd
S/T
iO2
TiO
2
(a)
Evo
lved
CO
2 (
pp
m)
Fig. 6. Visible-light photocatalytic activities of several Type-A (a), Type-B (b), and
Type-C (c) heterojunction structures. The amounts of CO2 evolved under visible-
light irradiation in 2 h were monitored.
Page 28 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
300 400 500
Ab
so
rba
nc
e (
A.
U.)
KI, Visible
KI + TiO2, Visible
KI + TiO2, UV
KI + ATO, Visible
KI + ATO/TiO2, Visible
Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 7. UV-vis spectra of 0.01 M KI aqueous solution in presence of several
catalytic systems after visible-light (422nm) or UV light irradiation for 2 h.
Page 29 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
Fig. 8. Fluorescence spectra measured for visible-light (310540 nm) irradiated
bare TiO2 (a), ATO/TiO2 (b), and ATO (c) suspensions in 3 mM TA. Wavelength
of the excitation light for obtaining the fluorescence spectra was 320 nm.
350 400 450 500
(b)
ATO/TiO2 in 0 h
ATO/TiO2 in 1 h
ATO/TiO2 in 2 h
Flu
ore
scen
ce In
ten
sity
(A
. U.)
350 400 450 500
TiO2 in 0 h
TiO2 in 1 h
TiO2 in 2 h
(a)
350 400 450 500
Wavelength (nm)
ATO in 0 h
ATO in 1 h
ATO in 2 h
(c)
Page 30 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
350 400 450 500
Flu
ore
scen
ce In
ten
sity
(A
. U.)
Wavelength (nm)
TiO2
Fe2O
3/TiO
2
Fe2O
3
Fig. 9. Fluorescence spectra of TAOH for the 3 mM TA suspensions with TiO2,
Fe2O3/TiO2, and Fe2O3 after 2 h irradiation of visible-light. Wavelength of the
excitation light for obtaining the fluorescence spectra was 320 nm.
Page 31 of 32 Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online
Design of Visible-Light Photocatalysts by Coupling of Narrow Bandgap Semiconductors
and TiO2: Effect of Their Relative Energy Band Positions in Photocatalytic Efficiency Sher Bahadur Rawal, Sandipan Bera, Daeki Lee, Du-Jeon Jang and Wan In Lee
Graphic Abstract
According to relative energy band positions between TiO2 and visible-light-absorbing semiconductors,
three different types of heterojunctions were designed, and their visible-light photocatalytic efficiencies
were analyzed.
Ev
olv
ed
CO
2 (
pp
m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
TiO2
Type-A
Type-B
Type-C
N-doped TiO2
Photocatalytic
activity in
visible-light
2-propanol
CO2
e-
Type-A TiO2
Sen-A
TiO2
h+
Sen-B
Type-B
TiO2 Sen-C
Type-C
Page 32 of 32Catalysis Science & Technology
Cata
lysi
s Sc
ien
ce &
Tech
no
logy
A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
ript
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of Y
ork
on 1
7/05
/201
3 11
:04:
49.
Publ
ished
on
02 M
ay 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc.
org
| doi:1
0.1039
/C3CY
00004D
View Article Online