Computer and Information Science; Vol. 9, No. 4; 2016 ISSN 1913-8989 E-ISSN 1913-8997
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
44
Design and Simulation Analysis of Multi-Agent Online Dissemination Model on the Basis of "The Spiral of Silence" Theory
Qiuyun Miao1 & Yang Shen1 1 School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautic, China Correspondence: Yang Shen, School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautic, Nanjing, China. Tel: 1-381-390-5870. E-mail: [email protected] Received: September 30, 2015 Accepted: October 16, 2015 Online Published: October 31, 2016 doi:10.5539/cis.v9n4p44 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/cis.v9n4p44 Abstract This article studies the classical theory of communications—the Spiral of Silence. The key factors are extracted for multi-agent modeling and simulation with Netlogo. It turns out that opinion climate is the external formation of the Spiral of Silence. Besides, the size of opinion climate has no direct effects on the Spiral of Silence. Keywords: the Spiral of Silence, multi-agent modeling, simulation, Netlogo 1. Introduction The innovation of "The Spiral of Silence" theory has attracted many researchers under today’s network communication environment, some scholars believe that the the Spiral of Silence in cyberspace is weakening which plays a new role in network media. GAO Xianchun et al. think that: "Mass media and specific individual communities make a difference in the new media environment constructed by Internet, mobile phones and others which are in the construction of specific event. And they both trigger the double helix of silence. In other words, mass media and individual communities form spirals respectively, meanwhile, both games lead to opinion cassette which is the factor affecting individual perception. As a result, the double helix of silence influences individual expressions of opinion. "(GAO Xianchun et al,2014) Yang Zhibiao supports the thory despite of its assumptions and limitations. In his opinion, it is still available in network environment. What is more, "the spiral of silence" is alive with "Against the Spiral of Silence". However, other scholars believe that the Spiral of Silence is still spinning in the new era. To explore the views of "Gay Bullying", Sherice Gearhart et al. investigate 760 participants. It was found that the the Spiral of Silence still exists in social networks, besides, personal ideology will also have an impact on the willingness of expression (Sherice Gearhart et al, pp. 18-36, 2014. ). Li Chuansheng points out that the Spiral of Silence still works because of the fear of isolation and group pressure in the network. What is more, the Internet has a character of anonymity, but net users’ behavior is not unrestricted and complete freedom does not exist which due to group norm and social norm in the network community. That is the reason why the Spiral of Silence is still in the spin (Li Chuansheng, pp. 4-12, 2014). Na Yeon Lee et al. carry out a series of studies on controversial topics among journalists who work for nine national newspapers and two networks broadcasting corporation through the empirical research. It turns out that the Spiral of Silence still exists, especially in the social networking site—Twitter (YL Na, pp. 443-458, 2015). Cheng Yao also points out that because of unconverted habits of netizens, squelch on the Internet and attention which the country begins paying to supervising public opinion online, the Spiral of Silence will coexist with public opinion on the network for a long time in a more subtle way. Moreover, according to a report released by the Pew Research Center and the Rutgers University, social media such as Twitter and Facebook will contain the diversification of views, hinder public affairs debates and limit people to state their views. Especially when they find that their opinions are different the fear of isolation; climate of opinion, and quasi-statistical sensewith friends’. The report also said that very few people who use social media regularly express different points of view offline. In order to study the impacts mechanisms of the Spiral of Silence, Scholars adopt empirical research through questionnaire to explore the impact of " the climate of opinion " – one factor of the Spiral of Silence. In Chang Ning’s research, it is found that post-90 college students adhere to the "expression"of the highest degree in real life. Unexpectedly, under the anonymous network, post-90 college students tend be more silence. The study also shows that the anonymity of the network is not the main factor to promote the expression. Zhou Baohua
cis.ccsenet.
investigateanalysis, dconsensus students othose of paAbove all,opinion inmechanismcharacterispropagatiosimulate th2. FramewThe Spiralhow peopexpressionsilence is wIn 1980, Ethought thfear of humsilence becmore willihypothese(1)Individu(2)The ind(3)The fea(4)The restheir views(5)This hypublic opinDue to thisolation, pcycle, one 3. Modelin3.1ModeliAccordingopinion an
org
es the willingndifferent clima
with the majon the Internetarents’, the net, the Spiral of
n the new era,m of the Spirastics of the Spon model of thhe model. Finawork of the Dl of Silence thele decide whe
n is associated widely used inElisabeth Noe
he spiral of sileman beings. Wcause of fear oing to expresss in summary. ual fear of isol
dividual evaluaar of isolation isults of evaluas. ypothesis relatnion and so on
he fear of isolpeople will tryvoice is grow
ng and Simulng based on th
g to Neumannnd quasi-statist
ness of collegete of opinion hority in socie. However, optwork has a sigf Silence may , but it still wal of Silence bpiral of Silencehe Spiral of Sially, the modeligest Format eory put forwaether or not twith external
n media and coelle-Neumann ence comes fr
When people foof isolation. Ons himself/herse
lation; ates the climateis used to deal ation affect ind
tes to four hypn. (Noelle-Neuation, the agey to seek the ming, while the ation based ohe Spiral of Siln’s theory, thertical sense. The
Fi
Computer an
e students and has different ety and those o
pinions of collgnificant positinot be fully c
works. At the by multi-agente from relativeilence by usinl will be valida
ard by Germanto express thepressure, such
ommunication rpublished Th
rom the natureound himself/hn the contrary,elf. In this bo
e of opinion cowith individua
dividual behav
potheses aboveumann, pp. 143ents will chanmainstream viother tends to n the Theorylence re are three me paper summa
igure 1. Model
nd Information S
45
its factors by effects on colleonline has no lege students aive effect on c
consistent withsame time, tht modeling. Tely objective p
ng multi-agent ated.
n communicatieir own true fh as the mediaresearch to des
he Spiral of Se of the societyherself is a me when a person
ook, she thoug
onstantly becauals who deviat
vior and opinio
e and they com3-158, 1977)nge their opiniiews and obsebe silence wh
main factors oarizes model a
l of the Spiral
Science
sampling survege students w
obvious effecare not the sam
college studenth the characterhere are few pThe paper attemperspectives. Amodeling. Th
on scholar Elifeelings. Accoa and the viewscribe the silen
Silence: Publicy, at the sameember of the mn is a member
ght that the the
use of fear of ite from the maon in public, e
mbine to expl
ions accordingrve the rally o
hich is called th
f the theory: as shown in Fig
of Silence.
vey. Based on which is suggescts on the expme as those ots to express thristics of dissepapers explorinmpts to descriAt first, this phen, the paper
sabeth Noelle-ording to the ts of people aronce of controvc Opinion-Oue time, it comeminority, he/shr of the majoriteory was mad
isolation. ainstream by thespecially by r
ain the format
g to majority of all kinds ofhe Spiral of Sil
the fear of isgure1.
Vol. 9, No. 4;
the test resultssted. The degrpression of coof main mediuheir opinions. emination of png the propagibe communic
paper will consadopts Netlog
-Neumann exptheory, the wiound. The spir
versial events. ur Social Skines from entrenhe would tend ty, he/she woude up of five
he society. revealing or h
tion and chang
opinion. To af views. Repealence.
olation; clima
2016
s and ee of
ollege um or
ublic ation ating struct go to
plains ill of ral of , she
nched to be
uld be basic
iding
ge of
avoid at the
ate of
cis.ccsenet.
Accordingand "consithis paper Hypothesipositive opratio of poHypothesian overwhopinion bymechanismHypothesiThere are t
The agentchanges, inincludes thin the prog"radius". Pcertain "p"count-aro3.2 Simula(1) PropertThe fear osystem in tof Spiral ochanges ininfluencesproperties Table 1. In
AgenTurtl
Patch
org
g to the model,istency with thraises some brs 1: There arepinion and neg
ositive and negs 2: There is o
helming view iy which the mm of the Spirals 3: In given ctwo main agen
t "turtle" is mndividual afraihe followings: gram) and "geProperties are patch" in ordound-num" is nation based on ties Settings of isolation anthe theory whiof silence onlinn this network. each other thrin Table I:
ntroduction of nt variableles Initial-pe
Initial-ch
r-afraid-ig-afraid-
hes red-turtlegreen-turradius
, the ultimate she majority" crief and necesse only two sidgative opinion
gative commenonly one kind in the dissemin
majority opiniol of Silence weconditions, Indnts in the const
made up of twoid-index will c"change-afrai
et-interest". Prused to counter to simulat
needed to achiethe Spiral of S
nd external clich prompts thne exists in co Attitude chanrough interacti
Property Settine name eople
hance
index -index es rtles
Computer an
source of the Scan affect the wsary assumptiodes in the dissn. At the saments.
of the majoritnation of publion can be randell. dividual views truction of sim
Figure 2
o attributes: achange accordid-index"、"ch
roperties of thet the number ote the climateeve the goal.Silence
limate of opinhe views of somomplex social nges of netizenions which cau
ngs explanationvalue scope representing value scope representing representing climate chanrepresenting "radius" arouvalue scope representing can be affect
nd Information S
46
Spiral of Silenwilling of expons: semination of
e time, climate
ty opinion onliic opinion. Thudomly decided
may change almulation model
2. Class Diagra
afraid-index aningly and agenhange-color" (Ce agent "patchof green and ree of opinion
nion affect theme events, evanetwork. The
ns can be reflecuses individual
[0,1000] the number of
[0,1] the probabilityred or green t
nges. the number o
und a certain "[1,10] the radius of
ted
Science
nce is fear of ispression directl
f public opinioe of opinion ca
ine. On the baus, adjusting td in the Intern
long with the sl, as shown in F
am
nd interest. Wnts may changColor changesh" consist of "ed turtles with
around a ce
e circumstancaluations and o
"Agent" can bcted by the chal to change op
f people in the
y distribution turtles' fear ind
of green and repatch"
the climate of
solation, but "cly. In order to
on. That is to an be simulate
asis of the theothe proportion net can simula
spread of publFigure 2.
When external e their opinion
s indicate the c"green-turtles"hin a radius ofertain "turtle"
es of informaopinions in socbe seen as maange of the "Aginions. The stu
e initial state
of initial state dex and it will
ed turtles with
f opinion in w
Vol. 9, No. 4;
climate of opinfacilitate rese
say there are ed by adjustin
ory, there is alof two sides o
ate the propag
ic opinion.
climate of opns. Setting metchanging of op、"red-turtles"f "radius" arou" and the me
ation disseminciety. The evolin element of gent". The "Agudy designs ag
l change as the
hin a radius of
which the turtle
2016
nion" earch,
only g the
ways of the ation
inion thods inion " and und a ethod
ation ution view gent"
gent’s
e
f
e
cis.ccsenet.org Computer and Information Science Vol. 9, No. 4; 2016
47
Most Internet users will try to avoid isolation caused by separate attitudes and views. When agents find their own views are different from those of most Internet users or those of the mainstream media, they will not tend to express their opinions. Instead, they may choose to change views to correspond to the mainstream views online. (2) Settings of initial state The slider--initial-chance is set to represent the distribution of initial state. The proportion of positive and negative opinions will vary when setting different ratios. Besides, The "initial-people" stands for the number of people who know the event and express their views. The "radius" is on behalf of the size of the climate of opinion in which the agent can be affected. According to the spiral of silence, the fear of isolation is inherent nature of the people, thus the initial values of "r-afraid-index" and "g-afraid-index" are set to 50 each. (3) Settings of interaction rules a. Collecting Statistics of climate of opinion around some individual: through Netlogo program, the climate of opinion can be collected automatically. (Here’s the code.)
to count-around-num ask turtles [set red-turtles(sum[count turtles with [color = red] ]of turtles in-radius radius) set green-turtles( sum[count turtles with [color = green] ]of turtles in-radius radius)]
end b. Changing Attitudes: when the value of the fear of isolation reaches a certain critical value, Internet users may change their views. What is more, when corresponding to the majority, agents will be willing to express their opinions and try to influence other agents. That’s why there is a process called "hatch", here’s the code.
to change-color if red-turtles > green-turtles [ if color = green and random r-afraid-index < 35 [set color red fd random 10 hatch 1 [set color red fd random 10 set r-afraid-index 50 ]] end
c. The ultimate source--"fear of isolation": the fear index will change accordingly when the individual is affected by the surroundings. In addition, different agents have different degrees of changes on the fear index. This part of the code is as follows:
to change-afraid-index if red-turtles > green-turtles [set r-afraid-index(r-afraid-index - random 10) set g-afraid-index(g-afraid-index + random 10)] if red-turtles < green-turtles [set g-afraid-index(g-afraid-index - random 10) set r-afraid-index(r-afraid-index + random 10)] end
3.3 Analysis of Experimental Results The initial value of " initial-people" is set to 880 which represents the number of people knowing the event at the first time. The initial value of " radius" is set to 1. The percentage of two sides is randomly decided and different percentages have direct impacts on future climate trends. In this paper, the values of initial-chance are 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9 respectively. Parameters are shown in Table II.. Table 2. Parameter 1
No. initial-people initial-chance radius r-afraid-index g-afraid-index 1 880 0.1 1 50 50 2 880 0.3 1 50 50 3 880 0.5 1 50 50 4 880 0.7 1 50 50 5 880 0.9 1 50 50
cis.ccsenet.
Then, Presto change,follows.
org
Experim
ss the "go" but, and the corre
Experim
ment 1
ExperimFigure 3. initia
tton to start ruesponding grap
ment 1
Computer an
Ex
ment 3 al interfaces co
unning the progphs also began
E
nd Information S
48
xperiment 2
Eorresponding t
gram. Agents n to be painte
Experiment 2
Science
Experiment 4to different pro
with different ed to show the
Experiment
oportions
views in the ie change of di
Experim
Vol. 9, No. 4;
3
interface will bifferent opinion
ment 3
2016
begin ns as
cis.ccsenet.
As can be ratios in thopinion resilence dothat is to spicture abominority oIn order tothe climatethe study, Table 3. Pa
Through th
org
seen in Figurehe initial stateepresents signes not work. I
say, the distribuove that the cl
opinion weakeno study the rele of opinion inas shown belo
arameter 2 No. ini1 882 883 884 88
hese experime
Expe
Experim
e 4., characterie (0.1, 0.3, 0.7ificantly fluctIt can be conclution of viewslimate of opinin. lationship betwn which the tu
ow.
itial-people 0 0 0 0 nts, correspon
eriment 1
Computer an
ment 4 Figure 4. c
istics of spiral 7 or 0.9): Thetuate decliningluded that unes affects the foion is able to m
ween the theorurtle can be aff
initial-chance0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
nding changes o
nd Information S
49
change curve c
of silence are e “majority” og. When the veven distributioormation of spimake the majo
ry and the parfected, five gro
e radius r-1 54 57 510 5
of curves are s
Science
Experimenchart
reflected clearpinion keeps value of “initon of opinionsiral of silence.ority opinion s
rameter—radiuoups of experi
-afraid-index0 0 0 0
shown as below
Experimen
nt 5
rly regardless oincreasing, whial-chance” iss is necessary . Besides, it castrengthen, wh
us which standimental param
g-afraid-in50 50 50 50
w:
nt 2
Vol. 9, No. 4;
of different ophile the “minos 0.5, the spirfor the theory
an be seen fromhile it can mak
ds for the radimeters are set u
ndex
2016
inion ority” al of
y, and m the ke the
us of up for
cis.ccsenet.
It is easy tthe inner ma few comresults are Table 4. R
R(1) represrepresents represents There is noof climate 4. ConclusThe paper analyses itopinion grexternal faspiral of siReferenceChang, N.
of CoCheng, Y.
403-4Gao, X. C
mediaLi, C. S. (2Na, Y. L.
relatio
org
to find that themechanism andmparative tests
summarized i
Research betwe
sents the numbthe number ored-turtles' av
o direct link bof opinion hassion is based on th
t. We can drawrow in strengtactor of the spiilence. es (2015). Comp
ommunication (2013). Study
405. C. et al. (2014)a environment2014). The app(2015). Twee
onship with th
Experiment 3Figure 5. c
e size of climad the relationsh were conductin Table IV :
een radius and radius 1 4 7 10
ber of red-turtf green-turtles
verage rate of r
etween the rads no direct imp
he framework ow the followingth while the miral of silence;
plex PerformanUniversity of Cying the ‘spira
. From "passivt. Press, 9, 43-plicability of speting the publhe public. Infor
Computer an
3 change curves
ate of opinion hip between thted. Apart from
opinions chanR(1) R(2) 792 2014792 1998792 1975792 1987
tles at first; R(
s at first; G(2) rrise; G(AVG) rep
dius and the chpact on the form
of the spiral ofg conclusions
minority opinio(3) The size o
nce of the SpirChina, 6, 109-al of silence’
ve silence" to 54. piral of silencelic: journalistsrmation Comm
nd Information S
50
corresponding
does not affeche size of climm the value o
nge rate G(1) G(1)
88 69 88 70 88 75 88 71
(2) represents tepresents the n
presents green-
hange rate of omation of spir
f silence. At thexperiments: (
on tend to die of climate of op
ral of silence t113. status seen fro
"active interac
e in the networ' Twitter use,
munication & S
Science
Experg to different ra
ct the formatiomate of opinionof “radius” oth
R(AVG) G(AV
174.57 2.71172.28 2.57169 1.86170.71 2.42
the number ofnumber of gre-turtles' averag
opinion. Thus,ral of silence.
e same time, th(1) The spiral out finally; (2
pinion has no
theory in the n
om BBS netw
ction": "doubl
rk era. Spread attitudes tow
Society, 18(4),
riment 4 adius
n of spiral of n and the rate oher parameters
VG)
1 7 6 2 f red-turtles afeen-turtles aftege rate of rise.
it can be conc
he study simulof silence can2) The climatedirect effects o
ew media env
work environm
e spiral of sile
and Copyrighward the public
443-458.
Vol. 9, No. 4;
silence. To expof opinion chan are invariant.
fter 7 secondser 7 seconds; R
cluded that the
lates the theoryn make the maje of opinion ion the formatio
ironment”, Jou
ment. Jin Tian,
ence" effect in
ht, 8, 4-12. c's tweets, and
2016
plore nges, . The
; G(1)
R(AVG)
e size
y and jority is the on of
urnal
316,
n new
d the
cis.ccsenet.org Computer and Information Science Vol. 9, No. 4; 2016
51
Noelle-Neumann. (1977). Turbulences in the Climate of Opinion: Methodological Applications of the spiral of silence theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(2), 143-158.
Sherice, G. et al. (2014). Gay Bullying and Online Opinion Expression: Testing Spiral of Silence in the Social Media Environment. Social Science Computer Review, 32(1), 18-36.
Yang, Z. B. (2014). New ‘Silence Spiral’ Theory in the Environment of Internet Communication. Journal of Harbin University, 35(7), 95-98.
Zhou, B. H. (2014). Empirical study of college students ' network expression and factors—the ‘Spiral of silence’ and the ‘climate of opinion’ as the core. Contemporary Communication, 5, 34-37.
Copyrights Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).