This project is funded by the European Commission
under Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement No. 784994
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Deliverable 2.1 Baseline report
Deliverable Number D2.1
Deliverable Name Baseline report
Deliverable Version V1.0
Work Package (WP) WP2 Status assessment, baseline and stakeholder mapping
Due date 31th December 2018
Date of Submission 31th December 2018
Main Author UNIZAG FSB
Contributors All Partners
Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect
the opinion of the funding authorities. The funding authorities are not responsible for any use that may come from
the information contained therein.
This report has been submitted to the EC for approval and as such it is still to be considered
as draft
2
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table of content
List of tables ....................................................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
Project background ........................................................................................................................................ 4
Scope of the report ........................................................................................................................................ 5
Baseline assessment ........................................................................................................................................... 7
Belgium........................................................................................................................................................... 8
Croatia .......................................................................................................................................................... 29
Norway ......................................................................................................................................................... 45
Latvia ............................................................................................................................................................ 63
Spain ............................................................................................................................................................. 83
Detailed and thorough analysis of the pilot municipalities ........................................................................... 102
Moorslede .................................................................................................................................................. 103
Joint SEAP for the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem, Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-Katelijne-Waver and Willebroek ........................................................................................................................................... 118
Velika Gorica .............................................................................................................................................. 130
Våler ........................................................................................................................................................... 142
Sarpsborg ................................................................................................................................................... 153
Salamanca .................................................................................................................................................. 164
Palencia ...................................................................................................................................................... 167
The 7 municipalitas of Ávila ....................................................................................................................... 176
Jekabpils ..................................................................................................................................................... 179
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................... 196
Sources ........................................................................................................................................................... 197
1
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
List of tables Table 1 Selected SEAPs- Belgium ....................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors ................................................................ 10 Table 3 Analysis of the general level of detail .................................................................................................. 11 Table 4 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction ............................ 14 Table 5 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................... 25 Table 6 Evaluation of the implemented measures .......................................................................................... 27 Table 7 Selected SEAPs-Croatia ........................................................................................................................ 29 Table 8 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors ................................................................ 30 Table 9 Analysis of the general level of detail .................................................................................................. 30 Table 10 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 33 Table 11 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 41 Table 12 Evaluation of the implemented measures ........................................................................................ 42 Table 13 Selected SE(C)APs-Norway ................................................................................................................ 46 Table 14 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors .............................................................. 47 Table 15 Analysis of the general level of detail ................................................................................................ 47 Table 16 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 50 Table 17 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 59 Table 18 Evaluation of the implemented measures ........................................................................................ 61 Table 19 Selected SE(C)APs-Latvia ................................................................................................................... 64 Table 20 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors .............................................................. 65 Table 21 Analysis of the general level of detail ................................................................................................ 65 Table 22 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 68 Table 23 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 77 Table 24 Evaluation of the implemented measures ........................................................................................ 81 Table 25 Selected SEAPs- Spain ....................................................................................................................... 84 Table 26 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors .............................................................. 85 Table 27 Analysis of the general level of detail ................................................................................................ 85 Table 28 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 88 Table 29 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 98 Table 30 Evaluation of the implemented measures ...................................................................................... 100 Table 31 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 103 Table 32 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 104 Table 33 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 106 Table 34 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 107 Table 35 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 109 Table 36 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 110 Table 37 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 111 Table 38 SEAP implementation-indicators .................................................................................................... 113 Table 39 SEAP monitoring overview .............................................................................................................. 115 Table 40 Municipalities that carry out the joint SEAP ................................................................................... 118 Table 41 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 118 Table 42 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 119 Table 43 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 121
2
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 44 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 122 Table 45 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 123 Table 46 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 124 Table 47 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 124 Table 48 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators ............................................................................................... 126 Table 49 SE(C)AP monitoring overview ......................................................................................................... 127 Table 50 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 130 Table 51 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 131 Table 52 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 133 Table 53 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 134 Table 54 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 134 Table 55 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 136 Table 56 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 137 Table 57 SEAP implementation- indicators .................................................................................................... 139 Table 58 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 142 Table 59 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 143 Table 60 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 144 Table 61 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 145 Table 62 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 146 Table 63 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 147 Table 64 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 147 Table 65 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators ............................................................................................... 149 Table 66 SECAP monitoring overview ............................................................................................................ 150 Table 67 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 153 Table 68 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 154 Table 69 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 155 Table 70 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 156 Table 71 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 157 Table 72 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 158 Table 73 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 159 Table 74 SECAP implementation- indicators ................................................................................................. 160 Table 75 SE(C)AP monitoring overview ......................................................................................................... 162 Table 76 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 164 Table 77 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 165 Table 78 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 167 Table 79 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 168 Table 80 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 169 Table 81 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 170 Table 82 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 171 Table 83 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 172 Table 84 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 172 Table 85 SEAP implementation- indicators .................................................................................................... 174 Table 86 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 176 Table 87 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 177
3
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 88 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 179 Table 89 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 180 Table 90 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 182 Table 91 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 183 Table 92 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 184 Table 93 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 186 Table 94 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 186 Table 95 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators ............................................................................................... 188 Table 96 SE(C)AP monitoring overview ......................................................................................................... 189
4
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to detail the overall status of the SE(C)AP implementation and development in
the partners country, with a special focus on the pilot municipalities. This step is key for all future actions
due to the large difference of the practice of the SE(C)AP development process and the level of the
implementation of the measures. The presented results will enable the evaluation of the feasibility and ease
of implementation of the devised PentaHelix method in different legal, economic and cultural framework.
Furthermore, they will also be used as a starting point for the implementation and replication steps.
Project background
The PentaHelix project is focusing on developing and testing a new approach for integrating multi-
governance planning for sustainable energy, both horizontal and vertical, together with close interaction
with key stakeholders in energy efficiency and sustainable energy solutions. Here, integrated development
focuses on five different stakeholder groups, who constitute the PentaHelix pillars:
• Public authorities (local, regional, national and international);
• Industry (and businesses such as SMEs, farmers, trade etc);
• Academia (research and educational institutes);
• NGOs (associations, interest organisations, etc);
• Citizens (house owners, car owners, commuters etc).
Representatives of the PentaHelix pillars constitute the task force groups, that serve as a driver for a wider
scope of the of Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs), as well as bringing in valuable insights
and identification of potential measures, system solutions and a better understanding of drivers and barriers
for a more sustainable society as a whole, in each specific region. The approach will be developed and tested
in Norway, Croatia, Latvia, Belgium and Spain, what will enable its validation across a wide set of different
economic, climate, social and political conditions. In each of those countries, municipalities which will act as
the pilot municipalities, are chosen.
Furthermore, the project aims at developing the peer-to-peer online platform for SECAP development that
can be used for multiple public authorities in joint planning and implementation. This will enable the
integration of different administrative levels and geographical planning areas as well as enhance the cost
efficiency in the entire planning and implementation process based on economy of scale and closer
cooperation and exchange.
To further enhance the impact of the project a broad replication and dissemination strategy and actions will
be rolled out in many countries in the EU. To ensure that the PentaHelix project will reach out to all parts of
the civil society, the consortium includes two network partners- Climate Action Network Europe (CAN
Europe) and the EBN innovation network.
5
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Scope of the report
First part of the report provides an overview of the general state of the art of the existing SE(C)APs
development in Belgium, Croatia, Norway, Latvia and Spain. For this purpose, five SE(C)APs have been
selected from each partner country. Those SE(C)APs represent municipalities of different population groups
and from different regions, in order to give a better overview of local conditions. Evaluation and analysis of
the selected SE(C)APs provide an insight into the general level of detail, the most common measures
proposed, indicators used for the monitoring, identified potentials and actually implemented measures.
Furthermore, brief description of each project country is provided within the first part of the report, detailing
the general information for the country such as: area, population, climate, economy, main branches of
industry, specifics of the country, number of CoM signatures , the most significant renewable energy sources,
the share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy.
The second part of the report presents the results of the detailed and thorough analysis conducted for the
pilot municipalities. As the pilot municipalities differ with previous experience of SE(C)AP development, the
analysis has been adjusted regarding the phase of SE(C)AP development. Here, the process of SE(C)AP
development has been divided into four phases: initiation, planning, implementation and monitoring phase.
Corresponding actions of each phase, which have been used as indicators to determine the current phase of
SE(C)AP development are depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Phases of SE(C)AP development
For the cases where the SE(C)AP is being revised, the information about the previous experiences with the
SE(C)AP development are presented for all four phases. In the cases where the new SECAP is being
developed, presented is the information about the current phase of the SECAP development.
6
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The results of the analysis present a wide range of information such as: involvement of municipal council and
stakeholders during each phase of SE(C)AP development, general level of detail of the existing SEAP (with
the special attention to baseline emissions inventory), proposed measures for CO2 reduction and its
potential, used implementation indicators etc. In the case when pilot municipalities which have submitted
their progress report to CoM are being analysed, partners gave an overview of the level of implementation
of the mitigation actions. The detailed thorough analysis analysis has been conducted for municipalities for
which nine SECAPs will be developed.
7
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Baseline assessment
8
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Belgium
Belgium has a total surface of 30.528 km² and has 11.358.357 inhabitants (1st Jan. 2018) [1].
The climate is a temperate sea climate (can be stated for the entire country), which means summers are
relatively chilly and winters are rather warm.
The economy of Belgium is orientated towards services, transport and trade; industrial sectors are in decline.
In West-Flanders the agricultural sector is very important, where the pig production, land cultivation and
horticulture are the main sectors. The REO auction in Roeselare (selling point for fruit, vegetables and herbs
in large volumes and worldwide) is a key actor. In the region Midwest, there are also several big companies
involved in the production of frozen products (strong link with the agricultural sector).
West-Flanders is a coastal province, the main harbours are Zeebrugge and Oostende.
In Flanders, many municipalities signed the Covenant of Mayors. In West-Flanders in every region a group of
municipalities was formed under the option 2-formula. This means there is the mutual goal of reaching 20%
reduction in exhaust of CO2 within the group, one baseline emission inventory and one SEAP were drafted.
In total 5 SEAP’s were drafted in this way: 4 by WVI and 1 by Leiedal. The bigger cities in West-Flanders are
individual participants in the CoM 2020 project.
The number of CoM 2020 signatories in Belgium according to the CoM website [2]: 221 (out of 589
municipalities in Belgium). This is not a representative number for the number of municipalities joining the
framework though. For example: in West-Flanders 41 municipalities are working together under option 2,
within 5 groups. This means they are counted as 5 signatories on the European website, instead of 41. This
also means that the number of municipalities according to population is not entirely correct (within a group,
the total population is taken into account). According to the CoM website [2], the following division can be
made:
o Number of municipalities XS (<10,000 inhabitants): 59
o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants): 139
o Number of municipalities M (50,000-250,00 inhabitants): 20
o Number of municipalities L (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 1
o Number of municipalities XL (> 500,000 inhabitants): 2
Here, the number of M municipalities is overrated and the number of XS and S municipalities is highly
underrated due to the corporations under option 2. Also, most of the Belgian participators are located in
Flanders.
The significant renewable energy sources in gross inland energy consumption: biofuels and renewable wastes
(5.4%), wind power (0.8%), solar power (0.5%) and hydro power (0.1% ) [3].
The share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy was 8.7% in in 2016 [4]
(target is 13%).
The basic information about five SEAPs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are presented
in Table 1.
9
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 1 Selected SEAPs- Belgium
Selected SEAP or SECAP
Country Population Area [km²] The number of municipalities
involved
1.SEAP Oostende Belgium 68 931 37.72 1
2.SEAP Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Belgium 302 137 446.48 13
3.SEAP Van Zee tot IJzer Belgium 101 843 585.95 9
4.SEAP Mechelen Belgium 86 304 65.19 1
5.SEAP Leuven Belgium 101 396 56.63 1
The information provided in Table 2 refer to the general goals for the CO2 reduction, set by the municipality,
and to emission factors used for the SE(C)AP development.
10
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 2 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors
General goals and used emission factors
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
The target overall CO2 emission reduction. [%]
51% over the period 1990-2020, with 62% direct reduction and
14% indirect reduction
20% over the period 2005-2020
20% over the period 2011-2020
20% 22%
Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction? [absolute reduction/ per capita reduction]
Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction
Emission factor which have been used IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC for energy -------
Additional remarks
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
The BEI is calculated for 2007, and then calculated back to 1990 (estimation).
Reduction goals are determined for the period 1990-2020.
Only for the sectors
The BEI is calculated for 2011 in detail, referrals are made
towards 2005
The reference year in the BEI (2011) is used
in the plan, no referrals to the past are made (as is the case in the other 2
SEAPs)
11
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
agriculture and waste
water+waste treatment CO2-
equivalents are taken into account (for the
other sectors only CO2 is taken into account).
The information provided in Table 3 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).
Table 3 Analysis of the general level of detail
Long-term vision
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality? NO (until 2020)
Focus on 2020, chapter with the long-
term strategy to become climate neutral in 2050
NO (until 2020) YES YES
CO2 emissions
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
YES YES YES YES YES
12
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sector?
YES YES YES YES YES
Energy consumption
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
YES YES NO (the BEI does) YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector?
NO YES NO (the BEI does) YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
NO NO NO YES NO
Buildings
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Does the SE(C)AP contain the description of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.)?
NO NO NO YES NO
13
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations? NO NO NO NO NO
Industry
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector? YES YES NO YES NO
Transport and mobility
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the demand for mobility (need for mobility)?
NO NO NO NO NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the public transportation?
NO NO NO NO NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the modes of transport?
NO NO NO NO NO
Stakeholders’ involvement
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Are the main stakeholders’ groups identified in the SE(C)AP?
NO NO YES YES YES
14
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP? NO NO NO NO NO
Additional remarks
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
The BEI is not repeated in the SEAP
The BEI is repeated in the SEAP
The BEI is not repeated in the SEAP
Table 4 presents the most common proposed measures and their potential for CO2 emission reduction, for each of the sector included in the analysed SEAPs. As analysed SEAPs are from different population size groups, the potential of CO2 reduction has been calculated per capita.
Table 4 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction
Buildings equipment/facilities
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in municipal buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Energy efficient/
energy neutral
municipal
buildings
2. Purchase of
renewable energy
3. Installation of PV
panels on
municipal
buildings
1. Purchase of 100%
renewable
electricity
2. Renewable energy
on public buildings
3. Master planning
for energy
refurbishment of
public buildings
and optimizing
energy use
1. Renovation (partial
or total) of
municipal buildings
2. Investments in
renewable energy
on/in municipal
buildings
3. Purchase of 100%
renewable energy
1. ESCO with Eandis
(energy Company)
2. Energy audit by
Eandis
3. Energy accounting
---------
15
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in municipal buildings equipment/ facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
0.0891 0.0827 0.0145 --------- ---------
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Purchase of
renewable energy
2. Group purchase
of roof insulation
3. Covenants about
energetic
renovation with
motivated
inhabitants
1. Local and regional
impacts of policies
of federal and
Flemish
governments (e.g.
Flemish law stating
that houses from
2020 on no longer
can be rented
when they have no
roof insulation
leads to actions
from house owners
in the
municipalities
towards placing
roof insulation)
2. Energy renovation
of social housing
stock
3. Deburdening of
house owners in
renovation
process,
1. Stimulating the
placement of
photovoltaic panels
on dwellings
2. Actions towards
stimulating
energetic
renovation of
dwellings
3. Cheap loan for
taking energy
measures in
dwellings (Flemish
energy loans)
1. Renovation waves
2. Full/complete roof
insulation
3. Replace single
glass by high
energy efficient
glazing
1. Renovation waves
2. Roof insulation in
existing houses
3. Replace single by
double glazing
16
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
refurbishment
assistance and
demonstrations of
renovations
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2
reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
0.8357 0.4631 0.5554 0.59 0.13
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities.
1. Purchase of
renewable energy
2. Closing of open
shop doors
1. Local and regional
impacts of policies
of federal and
Flemish
governments
2. Estimated
reduction not
associated with
any reported
actions
1. Actions towards LED
illumination and
quick wins (actions
that can rather
easily be
implemented by
companies, with
impact e.g. turning
of the light in
windows of shops
during the night, or
on car parks...
2. Awareness raising
towards the tertiary
sectors (to make
instruments and
support tools
regarding energy
efficiency and
1. Replace air curtain
with sliding doors
in ¼ of the
commercial
buildings
2. Ventilation system
D in ¼ of the
commercial
buildings
3. Reduce energy use
of lighting from 52
W/m² to 20 W/m²
by ½ of the
commercial
buildings
1. Replace air curtain
with sliding doors
in ¼ of the
commercial
buildings
2. Ventilation system
D in ¼ of the
commercial
buildings
17
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
renewable energy
known)
3. Actions towards
shops concerning
energy efficiency
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2
reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
0.4947 0.1423 0.0563 0.51 0.48
Transport
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in transport.
1. Shore based
power (with green
electricity)
2. Reduction in
emissions by ships
through a
sustainable policy
(10%)
3. Investing in buses
on green gas as
replacement for
old buses
1. Improving
infrastructure for
cycling and walking
(slow traffic)
2. Estimated
reduction not
associated with
any reported
actions
3. Electric cars –
setting the
example for
citizens (electric
cars for public
authorities)
1. Modal shift towards
going by bike or foot
2. Supporting
technological
progress (e.g.
electric vehicles)
3. Vehicle-restricted
city centers and
residential quarters
1. Combination of
cycle and public
transport city by
2030
2. Low emission zone
in city centre
Mechelen
3. Invite companies
(on voluntary
basis) to sign a
charter to reduce
the emissions of
their vehicle fleet
1. Database for
exchange of
transportation
services, such as
cars, renting a bike,
etc
2. Reduce extra travel
by local services to
compensate for
lack of local
services
3. Multifaceted,
33/33/33 (cycle,
public transport,
car) transport city.
18
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2
reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]
0.5182 0.1094 0.1874 0.23 0.42
Public lighting
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in public lighting.
1. Research, LED,
turning off and
dimming public
lighting, using
best available
techniques,
according to a
lighting plan
1. Dimming and
turning off
streetlights during
parts of the night
2. Urban or regional
lighting vision
3. Action plan to
reduce energy
consumption of
street lighting
1. Dimming and
turning off public
lighting during the
evening and/or
night + energy
efficient public
lighting according to
urban/regional
vision
2. Capacity-building
and awareness
raising
1. Execute public
lighting plan by
2020
2. Invest in energy
efficient PL
--------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in public lighting. [t CO2/ capita]
0.0059 0.0033 0.0029 0.02
Local electricity production
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
19
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local electricity production.
1. Wind turbines
(medium sized)
2. Solar panels for
industry, tertiary
sector and
residential sector
1. Stimulating
decentral local
renewable energy
production up to
5.5% of local
energy use by 2020
1. Stimulating
decentral (local)
renewable energy
production with the
aim to reduce CO2-
emissions up to 2%
by 2020
2. Supporting or
setting up
cooperative
structures for
renewable energy
1. PV-cells 162 MWE
by 2030
2. 10 wind turbines-
3MWe
3. 1 biomass boiler
of 1 MWth for 220
houses (collective
heat network
1. Residential PV-cells
(1/5 of roof
surface)
2. Non-residential PV-
cells (1/10 of roof
surface)
3. Windmills 2 MW
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local electricity production. [t CO2/ capita]
0.1240 0.3358 0.0704 0.28 Included in other
sectors
Local heat/cold production
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local heat/cold production.
1. District heating
network for the
city (no further
detail known than
that there is
enough potential
to do further
research)
1. New district
heating schemes
(interested
municipalities are
mentioned, as is a
possible heat
source namely the
1. Integrating heat
nets in the city
(interested
municipalities are
mentioned)
1. Heat pumps on
green power
(households)
2. Heat pumps for
heating and
cooling in 1/8 of al
buildings (Tertiary
sector)
1. Sun boiler on
1/10th of the non-
residential
buildings
2. 10 heat plants
3. Cogeneration
20
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
waste incinerator
in Harelbeke)
3. Residual/waste
heat from
industry,
riothermia
(renewable
energy)
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local heat/cold production. [t CO2/ capita]
2.0310 0.0030 0.0037 0.29 Included in other
sectors
Industry
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in industry.
1. Bio CHP in
companies
(general outline
i.e. 50% of the
energy demand of
industry could be
delivered,
therefore 10
1MWe-
installations are
necessary)
2. Purchase of
renewable energy
1. Carbon neutral
business parks
2. Revitalising
industrial parks –
researching for
options for heat
recovery and
district heating
------------ ------------ ------------
21
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
3. “Business park
neutrality” i.e. as
well as for
electricity as for
fossil fuels
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in industry. [t CO2/ capita]
1.1445 0.0248 ------------ ------------ ------------
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture.
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
1. Checking of
improper use of/
and correct
appointing of fuel
for agriculture
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in agriculture. [t CO2/ capita]
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 0.10
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry.
------------
1. Reinforcing the
blue-green
network in
urbanised areas
------------ ------------
1. Planting of 10.000
trees
2. Purchase of
247 105 (100
22
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
hectare) acre of
forest
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in forestry. [t CO2/ capita]
------------ 0.0059 ------------ ------------
Included by agriculture
Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries.
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in fisheries. [t CO2/ capita]
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Funding
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Are possible sources of funding mentioned in the SE(C)AP?
NO NO NO NO NO
Three measures which require the lowest total investment costs per tonne of CO2.
1. Replacing cars by
electric cars by
the city (electric
cars are cheaper
taking into
account the set of
fiscal and subsidy
instruments of
Flanders)
------------ ------------
1. Green power,
trade and services
2. Green power
industry
3. Employees will
receive mobility
budget rather
than company car
------------
23
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
2. Purchase of 100%
renewable energy
(no cost
calculated since
this type of
electricity is not
more expensive
than the “grey
power”)
3. Investing in buses
on green gas as
replacement for
old buses (extra
cost compared to
a normal bus is
relatively small)
Stakeholders’ involvement
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Three measures that are expected to require the greatest involvement of stakeholders.
1. District heating
2. Wind turbines
3. Renovations in
the residential
sector
1. District heating
2. Wind turbines
3. Urban or regional
lighting vision
1. District heating
2. Wind turbines
3. Vehicle-restricted
city centres and
residential quarters
1. Energy
management at
industries
2. Renovation of
existing houses
3. Group cargo
transport, to
transport together
1. Renovation of
existing houses
2. multimodal
mobility city
3. Replace lighting at
trade and service
companies
24
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Additional remarks
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Some elements not included in the CoM
framework are included in the BEI and SEAP e.g. rail traffic, shipping
transport.
Calculating the investment cost per ton CO2-reduction is
not giving a good insight, since it does not incorporate the reduction in cost for
energy use. For some measures the cost
couldn’t be determined.
The SEAP mentions that a financial plan will
still be developed
Table 5 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SEAPs.
25
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 5 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the building sector
1. Total energy use in
municipal
buildings
2. Total number of
energy scans
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Public lighting
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the public lighting.
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Transport
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport.
1. Investments in
construction or
repairs of cycling
paths
2. Number of buses
on renewable
energy
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
26
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local electricity production
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in local electricity production.
1. Amount of
renewable energy
set against the total
potential
2. Number of
photovoltaic
installations in
residential sector
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Local heat/cold production
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production.
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry.
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Additional remarks
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
27
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Selection out of the
list of indicators in the monitoring tool
No specific indicators are mentioned. The main indicator is the reduction in energy use in tonnes CO2 in
the MEI. In calculations, Flemish
standards and assessments are used. These items can’t be retrieved in the SEAP
itself.
No specific indicators are mentioned. The main indicator is the reduction in energy use in tonnes CO2 in
the MEI. In calculations, Flemish
standards and assessments are used. These items can’t be retrieved in the SEAP
itself.
Table 6 presents the progress of the SEAP implementation, for SEAPs for which at least one progress report has been submitted.
Table 6 Evaluation of the implemented measures
Implementation status
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP?
------------ ------------” ------------
Greenhouse gas emission reduction
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Greenhouse gas emission reduction of the completed actions.
[% COMPLETED ACTIONS]
------------ ------------ ------------ 6% ------------
28
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The potential of the greenhouse gas emission reduction of the ongoing actions.
[% ONGOING ACTIONS]
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
The sector with the highest greenhouse gas emission reduction from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
------------ ------------ ------------ Residential buildings ------------
Final energy consumption
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
Energy carrier with the highest change in final energy consumption (in percentage) from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
------------ ------------ ------------ Fossil fuels
Additional remarks
Oostende
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen
Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven
According to the database, the
monitoring overview was submitted in
2015. For each of the subitems there is only
the following mentioned: “no data
available”
The action plan was submitted in 2014.
Under the part “progress” the group
Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen can’t be found, although the monitoring should
have been executed.
The first monitoring has to be executed by
February 2019.
29
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Croatia
Republic of Croatia is located at the crossroads of Central and Southeast Europe, on the Adriatic Sea. Croatia
has 4.153 million inhabitants [5] and the surface area of total 87 667 square kilometres, which is made up of
56,538 square kilometres of mainland (65%) and 31 139 square kilometres (35%) of coastline (both inland
and territorial waters) [6].
The Croatian coast is located between the Dinaric Alps to the east and the Adriatic Sea to the west and has 1
800 km of coastline. Croatia has more than a thousand islands, islets and crags of which 48 of are inhabited.
The Croatian climate is mainly continental but at higher altitudes there is also a mountainous climate. In the
coastal regions the climate is classified as Mediterranean [6]. Mean annual precipitation ranges between 600
millimetres and 3,500 millimetres (depending on geographic region and prevailing climate type) [7].
Croatia's economy is dominated by service and industrial sectors and agriculture. Tourism is a significant
source of revenue, while the European Union is Croatia's most important trading partner.
Croatia has 62 Covenant of Mayors signatories. Based on the number of inhabitants, the following division
can be made:
o Number of municipalities XS (<10,000 inhabitants): 29
o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants): 25
o Number of municipalities M (50,000-250,00 inhabitants): 7
o Number of municipalities L (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 0
o Number of municipalities XL (>500,000 inhabitants): 1
In Croatia, biomass is the most significant energy source in gross inland energy consumption (15.1%) and it
is followed by hydro power (6.9%), wind power (1%) and solar energy (0.2%) [3]. Biomass is mostly used in
traditional wood fired stoves. The share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption is
28.3%. The basic information about five SEAPs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are
presented in Table 7.
Table 7 Selected SEAPs-Croatia
Selected SEAP or SECAP
Country Population Area [km2] The number of municipalities
involved
1. SEAP Grad Zagreb Croatia 802 338 641 1
2. SEAP Pregrada Croatia 7 165 67.26 1
3. SEAP Pula Croatia 57 460 51.65 1
4. SEAP Belišće Croatia 10 825 69 1
5.SEAP Zadar Croatia 71 471 194 1
The information provided in Table 8 refer to the general goals for the CO2 reduction, set by the municipality,
and to emission factors used for the SEAP development.
30
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 8 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors
General goals and used emission factors
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
The target overall CO2 emission reduction. [%]
21 % 21 % 21 % 21% 21%
Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction? [absolute reduction/ per capita reduction]
Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction
Emission factor which have been used IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC
The information provided in Table 9 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).
Table 9 Analysis of the general level of detail
Long-term vision
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality? NO NO NO NO NO
CO2 emissions
31
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sector?
YES YES YES YES YES
Energy consumption
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
YES YES NO YES YES
Buildings
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Does the SE(C)AP contain the description of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and
NO NO NO NO NO
32
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.)?
Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations? NO NO NO NO NO
Industry
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector? NO NO NO NO NO
Transport and mobility
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the demand for mobility (need for mobility)?
NO NO NO NO NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the public transportation?
YES YES NO YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the modes of transport?
YES NO NO NO YES
Stakeholders’ involvement
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Are the main stakeholders’ groups identified in the SE(C)AP?
YES NO NO YES NO
33
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 10 presents the most common proposed measures and their potential for CO2 emission reduction, for each of the sector included in the analysed SEAPs. As analysed SEAPs are from different population size groups, the potential of CO2 reduction has been calculated per capita.
Table 10 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction
Buildings equipment/facilities
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in municipal buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Education measures
and change in the
behaviour of the
employees/users of
the public buildings
2. Installation of solar
thermal collectors
for health and social
institutions owned
by the city
3. Thermal insulation
of the building
envelopes and roofs
1. Installation of
the solar thermal
collectors for
public buildings
2. Installation of
thermostatic
sets in all
municipal
buildings
3. Thermal
insulation of the
building
envelopes and
roofs
1. Thermal
insulation of the
building
envelopes and
roofs
2. Installation of
solar thermal
collectors on the
public buildings
3. Modernization
of the heating
systems in the
municipal
buildings
1. Thermal insulation
of the building
envelopes and
roofs
2. Installation of the
energy efficient
windows
3. Installation of the
small PV systems
on public buildings
1. Installation of PV
panels up to 30 kW
on public buildings
2. Thermal insulation of
the building
envelopes and roofs
3. Installation of the
programmable
thermostatic valves
Potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in municipal buildings equipment/ facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.022584
2. 0.000003
3. 0.030344
1. 0.002494
2. 0.003367
3. 0.004581
1. 0.036233
2. 0.009049
3. 0.011434
1. 0.003032
2. 0.003515
3. 0.002387
1. 0.001087
2. 0.003539
3. 0.003417
Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP?
YES YES YES YES YES
34
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Subsidies for
thermal insulation
of building
envelopes and roofs
of the residential
buildings
2. Subsidies for the
installation of
thermal solar
collectors on
residential buildings
3. Subsidies for the
purchase of the
energy-efficient
electrical appliances
for the residential
buildings
1. Subsidies for
thermal
insulation of
building
envelopes and
roofs for the
residential
buildings
2. Subsidies for the
installation of
thermal solar
collectors on
residential
buildings
3. Replacement of
the inefficient
light bulbs with
the energy
saving light bulbs
in all households
1. Energy efficiency
education for
the citizens
2. Subsidies for the
installation of PV
panels up to 30
kW on
residential
buildings
3. Subsidies for the
purchase of
biomass fired
boilers
1. Subsidies for
thermal insulation
of building
envelopes and
roofs of residential
buildings
2. Installation of
thermostatic sets
on radiators in
residential
buildings
3. Adoption of the
City Council
decision on
reduction of
municipal
contribution for
new low-energy
and passive
residential
buildings
1. Promotion of energy
efficiency
2. Subsidies for thermal
insulation of building
envelopes and roofs
of the residential
buildings
3. Subsidies for the
installation of PV
panels up to 10 kW
on residential
buildings
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.123277
2. 0.003357
3. 0.019867
1. 0.062052
2. 0.012535
3. 0.061934
1. 0.106056
2. 0.098938
3. 0.118674
1. 0.045092
2. 0.021111
3. 0.101918
1. 0.069343
2. 0.055792
3. 0.005073
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities.
1. Subsidies for
thermal insulation
of building
envelopes and roofs
1. Subsidies for the
installation of
the thermal solar
1. Subsidies for the
thermal
insulation of
building
1. Subsidies for the
installation of the
thermal solar
1. Subsidies for the
installation of PV
panels up to 30 kW
35
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
of the tertiary
buildings
2. Subsidies for the
use of renewable
energy sources in
the existing tertiary
buildings
3. Subsidies for the
purchase of the
energy-efficient
electrical appliances
collectors on the
tertiary buildings
2. Replacement of
the inefficient
lighting fixtures
with the energy-
efficient lighting
fixtures
3. Adoption of the
City Council
Decision on
reduction of cost
of municipal
contribution for
new tertiary
buildings which
use renewable
energy sources
envelopes of the
tertiary buildings
2. Subsidies for the
installation of PV
panels on the
tertiary buildings
3. Subsidies for the
energy efficient
lighting
collectors at the
tertiary buildings
2. Adoption of City
Council decision
on reduction of
municipal
contribution for
new tertiary
buildings which
are using
renewable energy
sources
3. Replacement of
the inefficient
lighting fixtures
with the energy
saving lighting
fixtures
on residential
buildings
2. Subsidies for the
installation of the
thermal solar
collectors on the
tertiary buildings
3. Subsidies for
windows
replacement,
thermal insulation of
building envelopes
and roofs of the
tertiary buildings
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.037889
2. 0.018945
3. 0.012139
1. 0.030324
2. 0.030204
3. 0.052004
1. 0.061991
2. 0.148399
3. 0.021598
1. 0.040002
2. 0.040002
3. 0.014650
1. 0.015219
2. 0.000566
3. 0.061698
Transport
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
36
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in transport.
1. Introduction of fees
for traffic pollution
in the city centre
2. Informing and
training for
environmentally
sound driving
3. Establishment of
the bicycle rental
network equipped
with IT theft
protection
1. Adoption of the
decision of the
City Council
granting
concessions for
bus
transportation
by gradual
replacement of
old buses by
biodiesel-fuelled
buses
2. A group of
measures to
improve bicycle
transport
3. Introduction of
an automated
city parking
billing system
1. Increasing the
share of
biodiesel in
transport
2. Measures for
encouraging use
of the public
transport
3. Informing and
training for
environmentally
sound driving
1. Increasing the
share of biodiesel
in transport
2. Introducing
automatic parking
charge system in
the city
1. Education and
promotion of the
energy efficiency in
traffic
2. Introducing a car-
sharing model
3. Introducing the
system of monitoring
driving style bus
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.011292
2. 0.012526
3. 0.016186
1. 0.028751
2. 0.0174566
3. 0.0262317
1. 0.208284
2. 0.043926
3. 0.098434
1. 0.046200
2. 0.011919
1. 0.072039
2. 0.027259
3. 0.002449
Public lighting
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
37
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in public lighting.
1. Replacing outdated
lighting fixtures
with energy-
efficient and more
environmentally-
friendly lighting
fixtures
2. Management and
regulation of the
public lighting
system
1. Reconstruction
of the public
lighting
1. Modernization
of the public
lighting
1. Replacing
outdated lighting
fixtures with
energy-efficient
and more
environmentally-
friendly lighting
fixtures
2. Management and
regulation of the
public lighting
system
1. Replacing outdated
lighting fixtures with
energy-efficient and
more
environmentally-
friendly lighting
fixtures
2. Regulation of the
public lighting
system
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in public lighting. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.0025388
2. 0.0072538 1. 0.004878 1. 0.015523
1. 0.004237
2. 0.001703
1. 0.016086
2. 0.010952
Local electricity production
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local electricity production.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local electricity production. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Local heat/cold production
38
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local heat/cold production.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local heat/cold production. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Industry
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in industry. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in industry. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in agriculture. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
39
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in forestry. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in fisheries. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Funding
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Are possible sources of funding mentioned in the SE(C)AP?
YES YES YES YES YES
Three measures which require the lowest total investment costs per tonne of CO2.
1. Education measures
and change in the
behaviour of
employees / users
of public buildings
2. Modernization of
school classroom
lighting
3. Replacement of the
fuel oil boilers with
the wood pellet
1. Education
measures and
change in the
behaviour of
employees /
users of public
buildings
2. Installation of
thermostatic
sets
1. Energy efficiency
education
Obrazovanje
građana
2. Subsidies for the
installation of
thermal solar
collectors on
municipal
buildings
1. Education
measures and
change in the
behaviour of
employees / users
of public buildings
2. Installation of
thermometers in
each room in the
municipal
buildings
1. Energy efficiency
education
2. Subsidies for
windows
replacement,
thermal insulation of
building envelopes
and roofs of the
tertiary buildings
3. Education and
promotion of the
40
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
boilers for
residential buildings
3. Subsidies for the
installation of PV
panels
energy efficiency in
traffic
Stakeholders’ involvement
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Three measures that are expected to require the greatest involvement of stakeholders.
1. Campaign One day
a week without a
car
2. Information and
training for
environmentally
sound driving
3. Education measures
and change in the
behaviour of
employees / users
of public buildings
1. Education
measures and
change in the
behaviour of
employees /
users of public
buildings
2. Installation of
thermostatic
sets in
residential
buildings
3. Replacement of
the inefficient
light bulbs with
the energy
saving light bulbs
in all households
1. Energy efficiency
education
2. Subsidies for the
purchase of
biomass fired
boilers
3. Subsidies for the
installation of
thermal solar
collectors on
municipal
buildings
1. 1Education
measures and
change in the
behaviour of
employees / users
of public
2. Installation of
thermostatic sets
in residential
buildings
3. Replacement of
the inefficient
lighting fixtures
with the energy
saving lighting
fixtures
1. Energy efficiency
education
2. Introducing a car-
sharing model
3. Introducing the
system of monitoring
driving style bus
Table 11 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SEAPs.
41
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 11 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the building sector
1. The total surface
area of the
installed solar
collectors in the
city
2. Total natural gas
consumption
------
1. Number of
replaced windows
and doors
replaced
2. Number of
installed biomass
boilers
1. The total surface
area of the
installed solar
collectors in the
city
2. Total electricity
consumption
------
Public lighting
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the public lighting.
------ ------ 1. Total electricity
consumption ------ ------
Transport
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport.
1. Number of
vehicles passing a
given metering
point in the year/
month
2. Number of
passengers in the
public transport
in one year
------
1. The volume of
fuel sold
2. Number of
passengers in the
public transport
1. Number of
passengers in the
public transport
in one year
2. Number of
kilometres of
bicycle paths in
the city
------
42
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local electricity production
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in local electricity production.
1. Electricity
production from
RES in the city
area
------ ------
1. Electricity
production from
RES in the city
area
------
Local heat/cold production
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Table 12 presents the progress of the SEAP implementation, for SEAPs for which at least one progress report has been submitted.
Table 12 Evaluation of the implemented measures
Implementation status
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP?
In the last submitted report, it has been
only indicated share of not started,
------ ------ ------
In the last submitted report, it has been
only indicated share of not started and
43
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
ongoing and
postponed mitigation actions. Sector
tertiary buildings equipment facilities
has the highest share of ongoing actions
ongoing mitigation actions. Sectors
municipal buildings equipment facilities, residential buildings,
public lighting transport and others have equal share of ongoing mitigation
actions (50%)
Greenhouse gas emission reduction
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Greenhouse gas emission reduction of the completed actions.
[% COMPLETED ACTIONS]
In the last submitted report, it has been
only indicated share of not started and ongoing mitigation
actions.
------ ------ ------
In the last submitted report, it has been
only indicated share of not started and ongoing mitigation
actions.
The potential of the greenhouse gas emission reduction of the ongoing actions.
[% ONGOING ACTIONS]
750 712 t CO2
92 % ------ ------ ------
161 448
85 %
The sector with the highest greenhouse gas emission reduction from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
Residential ------ ------ ------ ------
Final energy consumption
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
44
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Energy carrier with the highest change in final energy consumption (in percentage) from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
Renewables +160.7 % ------ ------ ------ ------
Additional remarks
Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar
Greenhouse gas emission have in total
increase from the year of BEI (2008) to
the year of most recent data available
(2015) for 4.8%. Transport and tertiary sector contribute the most in greenhouse
gas emission increasement.
Greenhouse gas from emission from transport have
increased by 9,5%, while in tertiary
sector emission have increased by 22%.
The Monitoring Report for the city of Pregrada has still not
been submitted to CoMO
The Monitoring Report for the city of Pula has still not been submitted to CoMO
The Monitoring Report for the city of Belišće has still not been submitted to
CoMO
Some of the necessary data for
the monitoring report are not provided (greenhouse gas
emission per sector and final energy
consumption in the year of the most
recent data available (2015)
45
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Norway
With the area of 324 000 km², Norway has a total population of 5 296 000 [8]. In recent years, the mean
temperature in Norway has generally been higher than normal. The exception was 2010, which was one of
the coldest years since 1900. The highest mean temperature was recorded in 2014 with 2.2 °C above average.
Other years with high averages are 1934, 1990 2006 and 2011 and 2015 - with 1.8 °C above average. In 2016,
the temperature was 1.5 °C above average [9].
Economic activity in Norway is on a rising path and the fall in unemployment continues. Growth is broad-
based. Private consumption is going up and businesses are investing more, both inside and outside the
petroleum sector. Some key figures for the Norwegian economy (NOK billion) [10]:
-Gross domestic product =3 279.4
-Gross fixed investment = 784.2
-Private consumption = 1 474.7
-Public consumption = 790-6
All of Norway’s industries have increased their exports over the past 20 years - by a total of 270%. The
petroleum industry is currently the most important export sector, accounting for 46% of Norway’s export
revenues. This is followed by the manufacturing industry, with around 30 %, and the services industry, with
around 20%. Almost 100% of electricity production in Norway is renewable (hydro power).
Eight Norwegian municipalities have signed CoM. The number of CoM signatories of municipalities in
population group are as follow:
o Number of municipalities XS (<10,000 inhabitants): 0
o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants):3
o Number of municipalities M (50,000-250,00 inhabitants): 3
o Number of municipalities L (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 2
409 out of 428 of the Norwegian municipalities (95.6%) have developed energy and climate plans [11].
The share of renewables in gross inland energy consumption is 50.2% of which 5.3% is biofuels and
renewable wastes, 0.7% is wind power and 44,2% hydro power. The share of energy from renewable sources
in gross final consumption of energy, the most significant renewable energy sources is 69.4%.
The basic information about five SE(C)APs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are
presented in Table 13.
46
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 13 Selected SE(C)APs-Norway
Selected SEAP or SECAP Country Population Area [km2]
The number of municipalities
involved
1. SE(C)AP Bærum Energy and climate plan 2013-2017
Norway 125 454 189 1
2. SE(C)AP Hvaler Energy and climate plan 2016-2028
Norway 4540 89 1
3.SE(C)AP Climate and energy plan for municipalities in Indre Østfold 2011-2020
Norway 61 717 2 242 10
4.SE(C)AP Climate plan for Ørsta municipality 2009-2020
Norway 10 812 804 1
5.SE(C)AP Tromsø Municipality Climate and energy plan 2008-2018
Norway 75 638 2 521 1
The information provided in Table 14 refer to the general goals for the CO2 reduction, set by the municipality,
and to emission factors used for the SE(C)AP development.
47
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 14 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors
General goals and used emission factors
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
The target overall CO2 emission reduction. [%]
20% by 2020 compared to 2008 as
the base year.
To become a Climate neutral municipality
by 2030
20% by 2020 compared to 2007 as
the base year.
20% by 2020 compared to 1990 as
the base year.
50% by 2020 compared to 1990 as
the base year.
Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction? [absolute reduction/ per capita reduction]
Absolute reduction No general CO2
reduction target has set in the SE(C)AP.
Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction
Emission factor which have been used ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The information provided in Table 15Table 15 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).
Table 15 Analysis of the general level of detail
Long-term vision
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality?
YES YES YES YES YES
48
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
CO2 emissions
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
NO YES NO NO NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sector?
YES NO YES NO YES
Energy consumption
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
YES NO YES YES NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector?
NO NO YES YES NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
NO NO NO YES NO
49
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Buildings
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Does the SE(C)AP contain the description of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.)?
YES NO NO NO NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations?
YES NO YES NO YES
Industry
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector? NO NO YES NO NO
Transport and mobility
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the demand for mobility (need for mobility)?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the public transportation?
YES YES YES YES YES
50
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the modes of transport?
YES YES YES YES YES
Stakeholders’ involvement
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Are the main stakeholders’ groups identified in the SE(C)AP?
NO YES YES YES YES
Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP? NO NO YES NO NO
Table 16 presents the most common proposed measures and their potential for CO2 emission reduction, for each of the sector included in the analysed SE(C)APs. As analysed SEAPs are from different population size groups, the potential of CO2 reduction has been calculated per capita.
Table 16 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction
Buildings equipment/facilities
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in municipal buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Replace
remaining oil-
based heaters
with more
environmentally
friendly energy
source
2. Link more of the
existing buildings
to district heating
1. Conversion from oil-
based boiler to
renewable energy
sources
2. Evaluate passive
housing standards for
newbuilding and
rehabilitation
3. Conversion of electric
heaters to district
1. Technical energy and
climate requirements
must be made for
new buildings and old
buildings must be
refurbished, ensuring
equivalent
requirements
1. Detail out all
profitable
energyefficiency
measures in
municipal
buildings
2. Integrate energy
competence and
energy review as
a basis for
1. Encreasing
energy efficiency
in existing
buildings and
setting new
requirements for
the new ones.
2. Installation of air
to air heat
pumps in older
51
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
3. Complete energy
labelling of
municipal
buildings
heating or other
renewable energy
sources in public
buildings
decision-making
in all alternatives
from the
planning stage.
3. Select renewable
energy for indoor
heating in all new
buildings.
buildings that
have no access
to district
heating network
Potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in municipal buildings equipment/ facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Processing of
applications and
control will
emphasize
energy content
and prevention
of environmental
and climate
hazards
2. Online energy
advice to
homeowners
1. Energy efficiency and
transition to renewable
energy sources in
households
2. To facilitate and
support the
households’ excess
power production to
the grid
1. Municipalities should
facilitate increasing
share of renewable
energy so developing
district heating and
biofuel will be more
profitable.
1. Systematically
communicate
information on
targets in the
climate plan, new
energy
requirements
and low energy
buildings at pre-
conference with
constructors
1. Gradually
phasing out the
use of oil
heating. Through
a preliminary
project, costs
and savings will
be calculated by
switching from
oil to gas - first
propane, later
LNG when
available - in the
buildings where
this is possible,
52
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
practical and
economical.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2
reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities.
------
1. Energy efficiency and
transition to renewable
energy sources in
business
2. Encourage companies
to carry out
environmental
certification
1. Municipality should
adapt environmental
guidelines, such as
development density
and requirements for
alternative energy
sources in the
development of
residential,
commercial and
public buildings.
1. Introduce a
routine that
ensures that all
new construction
areas and
business areas
are primarily
assessed with
renewable
energy supply
------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2
reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Transport
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in transport.
1. Establish new
free electric car
1. Create multiple
charging stations for
1. The municipalities
should influence the
1. Develop local
plan for walking
1. Development of
new bus flyt in
53
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
parking spaces
with power
outlets at
municipal
parking spaces
2. Develop a plan
for improvement
of cycle paths
and bicycle
parking
3. Work for
securing
pedestrian and
cycle paths to
schools
electric cars in central
locations in the
municipality - both in
public and private
parking areas.
2. Continue work for
better facilitation of
public services,
especially for work trips
to towns and upper
secondary schools.
3. Further focus on the
development of
walking and cycling
routes.
business community
to establish charging
stations for electric
cars
2. increasing the
number of biogas-
fueled busses in
public transport
and cycling with
a uniform design
as a basis for the
municipal area
plan for Ørsta
center and
Hovdebygda.
2. Developing a
more accessible
and affordable
public transport
with broader
network for
reducing
passenger car
traffic.
public transport
should focus on
LNG/CNG fuled
buses (with
external
financing)
2. Reduce the need
for driving to
and from schools
and
kindergartens.
Action Beintøft
("Walking Bus"),
children may go
to kindergarten
close to their
residence. The
kindergarten bus
is assessed,
financed with
funds from the
"reward
scheme".
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2
reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
54
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Public lighting
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in public lighting.
1. Replacement of light fixture for LED lighting
2. Provide LED lights along municipal roads
1. Increasing energy
efficiency in
street/road lighting
------
1. Reduction of
electricity use
heating and
lighting in all
public and
private buildings
by 20% by 2020
relative to the
energy
consumption in
2007
------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in public lighting. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Local electricity production
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local electricity production.
------ ------
1. Minimum 20% of
energy production
from local power
stations in Indre
Østfold must be
based on renewable
energy carriers.
1. Map potential of
local renewable
energy resources
1. Contribution to
Local Energy
Investigation at
Troms Kraft
Nett, network
consultant. Two-
way revision.
Access to new
55
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
renewable
energy sources
will be
emphasized
when choosing
development
areas.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local electricity production. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Local heat/cold production
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local heat/cold production.
------ ------
1. The municipality
should define their
role as a regional
planning authority
and a climate and
energy strategist for
the district heating
concessionaire prior
to rolling out the
municipal area and in
regulatory plans
1. Contribute to the
establishment of
district heating in
the downtown
Ørsta
2. Map available
waste heat and
set requisite
measures for
utilizing this
------
56
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local heat/cold production. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Industry
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in industry.
------
1. Having dialog with
industries and
businesses on the
municipality's climate
goals , informing them
about public
opportunities/benefites
and encaurage them to
increase energy
efficiency and
transition to renewable
energy sources
1. Emissions from
industry sould be
reduced by 20% from
2007 levels by 2020
1. Create
commitment to
environmentally
friendly
operation in the
local business
community
2. Profiling business
that achieve
good results in
reduction of
direct or indirect
greenhouse gas
emissions.
3. Work for
environmental
certification of
multiple activitie
------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
57
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
proposed measures for CO2 reduction in industry. [t CO2/ capita]
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture.
------ ------
1. Emissions from
agriculture and
industry should be
reduced by 20% from
2007 levels by 2020
2. The municipality
should increase the
proportion of
bioenergy in
agriculture by 10%
annually through
regulation and
stimulation schemes.
3. The municipality and
the agricultural
offices should ensure
framework conditions
that contribute to
reducing nitrogen
fertilizers in
agriculture by 10%
during the planning
period
1. to stimulate
measures that
reduce emissions
from agriculture
2. The municipality
should create a
working group in
cooperation with
agricultural
interests to enter
into dialogue in
order to
contribute
reduced
greenhouse gas
emissions from
agriculture
------
58
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in agriculture. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry.
------ ------
1. The municipality
should increase new
planting in the forest
areas and increase
the proportion of
withdrawals by 20%
by 2020
1. To stimulate for
active forestrY
------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in forestry. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in fisheries. [t CO2/ capita]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Funding
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Are possible sources of funding mentioned in the SE(C)AP?
YES YES NO NO NO
59
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Three measures which require the lowest total investment costs per tonne of CO2.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Stakeholders’ involvement
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Three measures that are expected to require the greatest involvement of stakeholders.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Table 17 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SE(C)APs.
Table 17 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the building sector
1. Total electricity
consumption
(GWh/year)
2. Energy use per m2
(kWh per
m2/year)
------ ------ ------ ------
Public lighting
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
60
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the public lighting.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Transport
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport.
1. Total gasoline
consumption,
(litter/year)
2. Total diesel
consumption,
(litter/year)
------ ------ ------ ------
Local electricity production
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in local electricity production.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Local heat/cold production
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
61
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in
Indre Ørsta Tromsø
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Table 18 presents the progress of the SE(C)AP implementation, for SEAPs for which at least one progress report has been submitted.
Table 18 Evaluation of the implemented measures
Implementation status
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP?
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Greenhouse gas emission reduction
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Greenhouse gas emission reduction of the completed actions.
[% COMPLETED ACTIONS]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The potential of the greenhouse gas emission reduction of the ongoing actions.
[% ONGOING ACTIONS]
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
The sector with the highest greenhouse gas emission reduction from the year of
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
62
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
Final energy consumption
Bærum Hvaler
Municipalities in Indre
Ørsta Tromsø
Energy carrier with the highest change in final energy consumption (in percentage) from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
63
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Latvia
Latvia is one of the three Baltic states, situated on the eastern shore of the Baltic Sea, between Estonia and
Lithuania. The country is also bordered by Russia and Belarus, and it shares maritime borders with Sweden.
With an area of 64 589 km², its mostly flat landscape offers a mix of beaches, rivers, lakes, marshes and
forests. Latvia is divided into five administrative regions: West Latvia (Kurzeme region), East Latvia (Latgale
region), North Latvia (Vidzeme region), South Latvia (Zemgale region) and central part (Riga region). Fertile
low-lying plains predominate in central Latvia, highlands in Vidzeme and Latgale to the east, and hilly moraine
in the western Kurzeme region. Forests cover one-third of the country, with over 3 000 small lakes and
numerous bogs. Climate is temperate, maritime, wet, with four seasons of almost equal length. Temperatures
in January are from -5 to -25°C, in July from 17 to 25°C. The country has a population of 1.95 million people
(in 2017), capital and largest city is Riga.
Economic data of Latvia in 2017 [12] was as following: GDP was 27.0 billion euros and growth of GDP 4.6%,
but GDP per capita was 13. 93 thousand euros; private consumption was 68.3 % of GDP and public
consumption was 9.4% of GDP, inflation rate was 2.9%, rate of wage growth was 7.9% and unemployment
rate 8.7%; exports of goods and services was in value of 16.52 billion euros, but imports of goods and services
was in value of 16.49 billion euros. Growth of industrial production was 8.5% in 2016 (calendar adjusted
data).
• Natural resources peat, limestone, dolomite, amber, hydropower, wood, arable land.
• Agriculture products: grain, sugar beets, potatoes, vegetables; beef, pork, milk, eggs; fish.
• Industries: automotive industry, railroad cars, agricultural machinery, fertilizers, electronics,
synthetic fibers, pharmaceuticals, processed foods, textiles.
• Exports - commodities: foodstuffs, wood and wood products, metals, machinery and
equipment, textiles.
• Exports - partners: Lithuania 17.8%, Russia 11.5%, Estonia 11.1%, Germany 6.3%, Poland 5.6%,
Sweden 5.2%, UK 5%, Denmark 4% (2015)
• Imports - commodities: machinery and equipment, consumer goods, chemicals, fuels, vehicles.
• Imports - partners: Lithuania 16.9%, Germany 11.2%, Poland 10.5%, Russia 8.1%, Estonia 7.7%,
Finland 5.2%, Netherlands 4% (2015) The main branches of industry: synthetic fibres,
agricultural machinery, fertilizers, radios, electronics, pharmaceuticals, processed foods,
textiles, timber.
The number of CoM signatories: 20 municipalities from 119 municipalities. The number of CoM signatories
of municipalities from the following population group:
o Number of municipalities XS (<10,000 inhabitants): 5
o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants):11
o Number of municipalities M (50,000-250,00 inhabitants): 3
o Number of municipalities L (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 0
o Number of municipalities XL (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 1
The share of renewables in gross inland energy consumption in Latvia is 37.00 %, of which: biofuels &
renewable waste: 31.8%, hydro power: 5.0% and wind power: 0.3.%
64
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The basic information about five SE(C)APs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are
presented in Table 19.
Table 19 Selected SE(C)APs-Latvia
Selected SEAP or SECAP
Country Population Area [km2] The number of municipalities
involved
1. SEAP Jelgava city SEAP Latvia 61 304 60.3 km² 1
2. SEAP Riga city SEAP Latvia 704 476 304 km² 1
3. SEAP Liepaja city SEAP Latvia 76 988 60.4 km² 1
4. SEAP Saldus county SEAP Latvia 27 661 1683 km2 1
5.SEAP Ozolnieki county, SEAP Latvia 10575 286.1 km² 1
The information provided in Table 20 refer to the general goals for the CO2 reduction, set by the municipality,
and to emission factors used for the SE(C)AP development.
65
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 20 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors
General goals and used emission factors
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
The target overall CO2 emission reduction. [%]
20% until 2020 25% until 2030
By 55% from 1990 till 2020
By 35% from 2006 to 2020
By 20% until 2020 5% in comparison
with 2016
Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction? [absolute reduction/ per capita reduction]
% of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year (2005)
As an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2
emissions in the baseline year)
% of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year (2006)
% of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year (2008)
% of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year (2016)
Emission factor which have been used IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC
The information provided in Table 21 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).
Table 21 Analysis of the general level of detail
Long-term vision
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality? YES YES YES YES YES
CO2 emissions
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
66
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
NO YES Yes, partly – for
natural gas, coal, etc. NO NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sector?
YES YES YES YES NO
Energy consumption
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
YES YES Yes, for gas YES NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector?
YES YES YES YES NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
NO
Consumption of the buildings in kWh/m2
is given for public buildings, the private
building - the description of the
stock and assessment of renovated buildings –
consumption in kWh/m2
Yes, total consumption and per
types of houses -------
No, just the average consumption figure
67
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Buildings
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Does the SE(C)AP contain the description of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.)?
YES YES
Partly – describes number of houses
where EE refurbishment has
been done
YES Yes, the overall
situation, but not in detail
Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations?
NO NO NO NO NO
Industry
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector?
No other industry, just the heating sector which is
provided by “Fortum Jelgava “, Ltd. – which
is local heating and electricity producer
and distributor.
From industry - just the heating
production sector and electricity production
sector
YES NO NO
Transport and mobility
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the demand for mobility (need for mobility)? NO
No description of the needs, but provides the description of
what is existent and what is planned (most
YES YES YES
68
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
probably based on
the needs
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the public transportation?
YES YES YES YES NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the modes of transport?
YES YES YES YES YES
Stakeholders’ involvement
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Are the main stakeholders’ groups identified in the SE(C)AP? YES
Yes – stakeholders in energy production, consumption etc.
YES YES YES
Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP?
NO
Partly - , there is action plan for public involvement, but not
for stakeholders involvement
YES YES YES
Table 22 presents the most common proposed measures and their potential for CO2 emission reduction, for each of the sector included in the analysed SEAPs. As analysed SEAPs are from different population size groups, the potential of CO2 reduction has been calculated per capita.
Table 22 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction
Buildings equipment/facilities
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in municipal buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Improvement of
EE of municipal
buildings
1. Renovations of
buildings
1. Reduction of
energy
consumption in
1. Green
procurement
1. Energy
management
system
69
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
(concrete
buildings listed)
2. ICT solutions in
energy
management
3. Energy
management
systems
the municipal
buildings –
monitoring of
energy
consumption,
training of staff
on energy saving
measures, on
regulating
temperatures; to
plan investments
for energy
efficiency
improvements.
2. EE refurbishment
of residential
houses
3. Liquidation of
separate boiler
houses and
joining in one DH
system,
substitution the
gas with wood
biomass
2. Inventory of
street lighting -
change of
incandescent
lamps by the LED
will consume less
electricity, part of
electricity
production is
from fossil fuels.
3. Decreasing of
electricity
consumption in
municipal
buildings
2. EE measures in
municipality
buildings
3. EE measures in
public lighting
Potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in municipal buildings equipment/ facilities.
0.00383 t CO2/capita (from 2005-2020)
Renovation of buildings connected to the district heating system to achieve a 1.5 % yearly
0.000052 --------- ---------
70
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
[t CO2/ capita] reduction in heat
consumption by consumer
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities.
1. EE refurbishment
of multi
residential
buildings –
complex
renovation
1. Renovation of
buildings
connected to the
district heating
system to achieve
a 1.5 % yearly
reduction in heat
consumption by
consumers
1. Implementation
of EE measures
2. Application of
property tax
reduction to
nearly 0 and low
energy
consumption
buildings
1. Elaboration of
buildings
infrastructure
development
plan.
2. EE renovation of
multi residential
buildings.
3. Organisation of
informative
campaigns for
residents
1. EE renovation of
multi residential
buildings
2. Regulation of
heating solutions
in the multi
residential
buildings, where
heating is
provided
individually
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
0.16658 0.000089 0.01264 --------- ---------
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities.
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities [t CO2/ capita]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
71
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Transport
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in transport.
1. Building of the
infrastructure for
Traffic terminal
(Bus station)
2. Electric vehicles
3. Bicycle roads
1. Extent of bio -fuel use in municipal public transport, % of the total fuel consumption
2. Number of hydrogen powered (both fuel-cell andbattery) vehicles replacing city busses
1. Elaboration of
mobility plan
2. Optimization of
the transport
routes
3. Pilot project of
electrical
transport vehicles
1. Elaboration of
mobility plan for
municipality.
2. Development of
bicycle transport
infrastructure.
3. Analysis of
alternative
transport modes
1. Development of
environmentallly
friendly types of
transport
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Public lighting
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in public lighting.
1. Improvement of EE in public lighting:
2. Modernisation of
the management
system for street
ligting
1. Renovation of city lighting by introducing LED lighting
1. Monitoring of the
energy
consumption for
public lighting
and the
corrective
measures
1. Change of high
pressure mercury
lamps and
incandescent
bulbs to energy
efficient modern
lamps.
1. Metering and
registering of
energy
consumption for
the public lighting
2. Analysis of the
consumption
72
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
3. Reconstruction of
street ligting
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in public lighting. [t CO2/ capita]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Local electricity production
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local electricity production.
Building of cogeneration power station (using wood biomass) in Rūpniecības street 73
--------- --------- --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local electricity production. [t CO2/ capita]
0.07501 --------- --------- --------- ---------
Local heat/cold production
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local heat/cold production.
1. Use of RES in heat
production
2. Reduction of heat
losses in the
district heating
(DH) system and
improvement of
1. Produce additional heat per calendar year with the use of condensation economisers (saving system for
1. Combining the
boiler houses and
substitution of
gas with wood
biomass
1. Elaboration of
heat suply and
building
infrastructure
development
plan.
1. EE measures in
boiler houses
2. Renovation of
heat supply lines
to reduce losses
73
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
the heat supply
security
flue gas heat recovery) installed in the heat sources of JSC “Rigas siltums”
2. Produce additional heat per calendar year with the use of the absorption- type heat pump in the cogeneration unit of HP “Imanta”
3. Produce additional heat per calendar year with the use of wood chips for the production of energy at JSC “Rigas siltums”
2. Renovation of
heat supply
networks
3. EE measures in
CHP stations and
boiler houses
2. Investment
planning for
modernisation of
DHSs in small
villages.
3. Change of heating
sources from
fossil to RES.
3. Attraction of new
consumers of
district heating
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local heat/cold production. [t CO2/ capita]
0.2612 0.00015 0.19464 --------- ---------
74
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Industry
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in industry.
None, only production of heat and electricity included
None, only production of heat and electricity include
--------- --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in industry. [t CO2/ capita]
0.02512 --------- --------- --------- ---------
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture. None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in agriculture. [t CO2/ capita]
None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry. None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in forestry. [t CO2/ capita]
None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------
75
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries. None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in fisheries. [t CO2/ capita]
None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------
Funding
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Are possible sources of funding mentioned in the SE(C)AP?
1. Municipality
budget
2. National and EU
programmes
3. ESCO
1. EU programmes,
as Horizon2020,
Green Investment
programmes
2. ESCO
3. Revolving fund
4. Municipal funding
1. Municipality
budget
2. National and EU
programmes
3. ESCO
1. Municipality
bugdet.
2. National and EU
programmes.
3. ESCO
NO
Three measures which require the lowest total investment costs per tonne of CO2.
Not given per tonne of CO2
Not given per tonne/CO2, but the measures of the lowest investment amounts are: 1. Construction of a
hydrogen
charging station
in the city 2014–
2020,
1 million EUR
1. Application of the
reduced property
tax to zero energy
and low energy
buildings
buldings”
2. Attraction of new
customers to DH
system
3. Elaboration of the
procedure of
Not given.
Not given per
tonne/CO2, but the
lowest investment
measures:
1. Metering and
recording of
electricity
consumption for
public lighting
separate units
76
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
2. Creation of an
infrastructure of
slow charging
stations for
electric cars in
the car parking
spaces of the LTD
“Rigas satiksme”
2014 - 2020, 0.92
million EUR
3. Creation of an
infrastructure of
rapid charging
stations for
electric cars
2014–2016, 0.48
million EUR
green public
procurement and
use of it in Liepaja
2. More detailed
recoridng of fuel
consumption for
public fleet
Stakeholders’ involvement
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Three measures that are expected to require the greatest involvement of stakeholders.
1. Improvement of
energy efficiency
of multi
residential
buildings (high
investment and
complicated
decision making)
1. Complex renovation of 5944 multi -apartment houses with the total area of 11.85 million m². Average renovation costs
1. Energy Forum
once per year to
discuss all the
actual SEAP
measures with
residents
1. EE refurbishment
of private
buildings
2. Use of
environmentally
friendly transport
vehicles
1. EE refurbishment
of private
buildings
2. Use of
environmentally
friendly transport
vehicles
77
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
2. Use of RES in heat
supply (the
highest
investment)
3. Use of
environmentally
friendly transport
vehicles
approximately 100 EUR/m².
2. Elaboration of energy certificates for 5900 multi- apartment houses (energy audits) with financial aid of the Municipality covering 80% of the energy audit costs
2. EE refurbishment
of private
buildings
3. Questionaires to
obtain the
residents opinion
Table 23 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SEAPs
Table 23 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the building sector
1. Number of
renovated
buildings in the
city
2. Volume of the
measures, %
against the total
building stock
1. Reduction of energy consumption MWh in a calendar year at the end-user level as indicated by the reduction in the amount of energy delivered;
1. Final energy
consumption in
municipality buildings
MWh (separately:
heat, hot water,
electricity)
2. Heat consumption per
building kWh/m2
3. Number of renovated
buildings.
1. Final energy
consumption in
municipality buildings
and residental
buildings MWh.
2. Number of renovated
buildings
(residential/municipal).
1. Number of renovated
buildings
2. Number of installed
heat meters
78
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
2. Comprehensively
renovated multi- apartment houses in the city, number and percentage of the total area;
3. Comprehensively renovated municipality owned buildings in Riga, number and percentage of the total area;
3. Number of buildings
with energy
management system.
Public lighting
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the public lighting.
1. Saving in energy
consumption of
the municipal
lighting - % of
the total
consumption
--------- ---------
1. Number of newly
installed sections for
public lighting.
1. Number of newly
installed sections for
public lighting
2. Number of projects in
upgrading of street
lighting
Transport
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
79
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport.
1. The proportion
of the biofuel
versus the total
fuel amount in
the sector of the
public transport
1. Number of zero emission transport vehicles introduced in the city public transport to replace buses driven on traditional fuel
2. Share of biofuel, in percent of the total combustible consumption in public road transport
1. Length of bicycle
roads, km
2. Final energy
consumption of
municipality transport
fleet
1. Length of bicycle
roads.
2. Number of bicycle
parking places.
1. Length of bicycle
roads
2. Number of electric
vehicles
Local electricity production
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in local electricity production.
1. Energy
produced
(MWh) in a year
using renewable
energy
resources
1. The amount of generated energy (MWh) from renewable energy sources with heat pumps, sun collectors and batteries, fuel elements and other types of renewable energy sources;
1. Increase of RES for
locally produced
electricity
1. Increase of RES for
locally produced
electricity.
1. Energy produced
from RES
80
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local heat/cold production
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production.
1. Production of
energy (MWh)
using renewable
energy
resources
2. Proportion of
usage of
renewable
energy
resources in
heat production
within the
district heating
system versus
the total
amount of fuels
used annually
(MWh);
1. Amount of the heat recovered during the energy generation process, as well as during the technological processes of production (e.g., recovered flue -gas heat through flue-gas moisture condensation, heat recovery from cooling flows with the use of heat pumps, drain water heat recovery with the use of heat pumps, etc.
2. Use of renewable energy sources for energy production in the district heating system, in per
1. Increase of RES for
locally produced heat
energy
2. Number of boiler
houses using gas
1. Increase of RES for
locally produced heat
energy.
2. Number of heat
production sources
with improved fuel
starge.
1. Number of installed
heat meters
2. Heat losses in the
heat supply
networks, %
81
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
cent of the used fuel amount (MWh) per year
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry. ---------
None, just
production of heat
and electricity has
been tackled
None in industry sector,
but number of boilers, RES
installed is monitored as
responsibility of
municipality
--------- ---------
Table 24 presents the progress of the SEAP implementation, for SEAPs for which at least one progress report has been submitted.
Table 24 Evaluation of the implemented measures
Implementation status
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP.
Local heat production,
EE measures in municipal buildings,
Residential buildings
Municipal buildings
Renovation of multi residential buildings
Local heat production
residential buildings ---------
Municipal and residential buildings
Greenhouse gas emission reduction
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Greenhouse gas emission reduction of the completed actions.
Local heat production 99.65%
Not available in CoM webpage
Local heat production 86.91%
--------- The plan is just
completed in 2018
82
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
[% COMPLETED ACTIONS] Municipal 0.17%
Residential 0.10%
Residential 5.64%
Other measures 7.43%
The potential of the greenhouse gas emission reduction of the ongoing actions.
[% ONGOING ACTIONS]
---------
It is given that from 1990 to 2020 Riga
reduces emissions per
2258729.1 tonnes CO2/per year
(from about 4 mil. tonnes to about 2 mil.
tonnes)
--------- ---------
Not given, the aim is to reduce 10% of
energy consumption in the municipal
buildings and the related infrastructure, and to reduce 5% of energy consumption in energy production
sector.
The sector with the highest greenhouse gas emission reduction from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
Local heat production
municipal buildings,
Residential buildings
Results not available, but as per
calculations within the plan:
Local heat production,
Renovation of buildings
Local heat production
residential buildings ---------
Information has not been compiled, but it would have to be EE
refurbishment of municipal buildings
and multi residential buildings as most of
them have been refurbished
Final energy consumption
Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki
Energy carrier with the highest change in final energy consumption (in percentage) from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
Heat/RES Heat Heat/RES --------- ---------
83
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Spain
The Kingdom of Spain is a country mostly located on the Iberian Peninsula in Europe. With an area of 505 990
km2, is the largest country in Southern Europe. By population, Spain is the fifth in the European Union. Spain's
capital and largest city is Madrid.
Its territory also includes two archipelagos: the Canary Islands off the coast of Africa, and the Balearic Islands
in the Mediterranean Sea. The African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla make Spain the only European country
to have a physical border with an Africa.There are also some small islands in the Alboran Sea.
There are three climatic zones, according to geographical situation and orographic conditions:
• the Mediterranean climate, characterised by warm/hot and dry summers, is dominant in the
peninsula;
• the semi-arid climate, is predominant in the southeastern quarter of the country;
• the oceanic climate, is located in the northern quarter of the country, mainly in the Atlantic region.
In Spain, a country with no hydrocarbon deposits, the contribution from renewable energies to the electric
generation mix has already reached close on 40%. Figure 2 shows the final energy consumption in Spain.
Figure 2 Final energy consumption in Spain [13]
Total Final Energy consumption is 85.874 ktoe and the renewable energy contribution is 15.9%. Spain is the
second-placed country in Europe in terms of wind power generation and the fourth worldwide in terms of
installed power: 23 047 MW.
Spain is a country that has bet and bets decidedly for the development of renewable energies because of
their social, environmental benefits and for their lower energy dependence. The socio-economic benefits
revolve around the creation of employment and business opportunities, both inside and outside our country,
where Spanish companies and technologies occupy a leading position.
There are 1 815 signatories in Spain which 1 512 has already submitted the SEAP or SECAP; 27 Covenant
Coordinators, 9 promoters and 8 energy agencies. This represent around 22% of Spanish municipalities
participating in the CoM. The number of CoM signatories of municipalities in population group are as follow:
84
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
o Number of municipalities XS (<10,000 inhabitants): 1 164
o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants):270
o Number of municipalities M (50,000-250,00 inhabitants): 71
o Number of municipalities L (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 9
o Number of municipalities XL (>500,000 inhabitants): 9
The most extensive Spanish region and one of the largest of the European Union is Castilla y León, with a
regional territorial area of 94 224 km2 Castilla y León is structured in nine provinces and 2,249 city and town
councils (almost 30% of the existing ones in Spain). Castilla and Leon has an official population of around 2.5
million (2016), represents 5.69% of the population of Spain, although its vast territory covers almost a fifth
of the total area of the country. The population of Castile and León was divided, by province, as follows:
Province of Ávila, Burgos, León, Palencia, Salamanca, Segovia, Valladolid, Zamora.
The basic information about five SEAPs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are presented
in Table 25Table 1.
Table 25 Selected SEAPs- Spain
Selected SEAP or SECAP
Country Population Area [km2]
The number of municipalities
involved
1. SEAP Palencia Palencia 79 137 94. 71 km2 1
2. SEAP Soria Soria 40 218 271.77 km2 1
3. SEAP Valladolid Valladolid 325 000 197.41 km2 1
4. SEAP Vall D´en Bas Vall D´en Bas 2 983 90.7 km2 1
5.SEAP La Coruña La Coruña 243 978 37.6 km2 1
The information provided in Table 31 refer to the general goals for the CO2 reduction, set by the municipality,
and to emission factors used for the SE(C)AP development.
85
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 26 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors
General goals and used emission factors
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
The target overall CO2 emission reduction. [%]
20 20 20 20 20
Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction? [absolute reduction/ per capita reduction]
Per capita reduction Per capita reduction Per capita reduction Per capita reduction Per capita reduction
Emission factor which have been used IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC
The information provided in Table 27Table 21 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).
Table 27 Analysis of the general level of detail
Long-term vision
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality?
YES YES YES YES YES
86
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
CO2 emissions
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
NO YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sector?
YES YES YES YES YES
Energy consumption
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
NO NO NO NO NO
87
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Buildings
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Does the SE(C)AP contain the description of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.)?
NO NO NO NO NO
Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations?
YES YES YES YES YES
Industry
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector?
YES NO YES NO YES
Transport and mobility
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the demand for mobility (need for mobility)?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the public transportation?
YES YES YES YES YES
Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the modes of transport?
YES YES YES YES YES
88
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Stakeholders’ involvement
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Are the main stakeholders’ groups identified in the SE(C)AP?
NO NO NO YES YES
Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP? NO NO NO YES YES
Table 28 presents the most common proposed measures and their potential for CO2 emission reduction, for each of the sector included in the analysed SEAPs. As analysed SEAPs are from different population size groups, the potential of CO2 reduction has been calculated per capita.
Table 28 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction
Buildings equipment/facilities
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in municipal buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Minimization
energy demand
for heating and
cooling as well as
the promotion of
renewable energy
sources
2. Conducting energy
audits in all building
3. Replacement oil/gas
boilers to biomass in
Schools
1. District heating
with biomass.
2. Improvement of the
envelope of
Municipal Schools
3. Leak control Plan in
the Supply
Municipality System
of Water.
1. Replacement of
existing thermal
installations by
systems using local
biomass.
2. Progressive
reduction of
electricity
consumption in
interior lighting.
1. Install biomass
boilers in old
schools of Sant
Privat d'en Bas.
2. Guarantee the
creation of a
municipal energy
manager and
create the figure of
a SEAP coordinator.
3. Development of
the ISO 50001
regulations in the
main buildings.
1. Implementation of
a digital platform
for centralizing
energy
management
system in buildings
and infrastructure
municipal service.
2. Programs of audits
and certifications
in energy in
municipal
buildings and
facilities.
89
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
3. Implementation
plans for
geothermal
energy and
biomass in
municipal
buildings.
Potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in municipal buildings equipment/ facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.196
2. –
3. 0.381
1. 0.0205
2. 0.0025
3. 0.097
1. 0.108
2. 0.095
1. 0.0042
2. 0.0064
3. 0.0008
1. 0.0037.
2. 0.0022
3. 0.0073
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities.
1. Development
programs aimed
at the promotion
housing
rehabilitation.
2. Public
information
campaign for
citizens on the
importance of
energy save.
1. District heating
with biomass.
2. Campaign
awareness
reduction
electricity
consumption.
1. Promotion of the implementation of collective thermal systems of collective type compared to current individual systems.
1. Indicate the
energy rating of
the private homes
for sale in the
municipality area.
2. Encourage
installation of
biomass boilers by
25% of them
houses
3. Encourage
renovation of
class A and/or
biothermal
appliances in
residential
buildings.
1. Urbanize and
provide the city of
“A Coruña” with
new services and
more sustainable
infrastructures for
citizens.
2. Reduce energy
consumption in
construction and
use of buildings,
promoting of
passive
architectural
solution
conditioning in all
projects.
90
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
3. Reduction of CO2
emissions through
the promotion of
energy
certification in
buildings.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]
---------
1. 0.104
2. 0.036
1. 0036 1. 0.0067
2. 0.159
3. 0.021
1. 0.166
2. -------
3. 0.0074
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities.
1. Public
information
campaigns for
service and
tertiary
companies on the
importance of
implement energy
saving measures.
1. District heating
with biomass.
2. Green commerce
net.
1. Planned measures which will lead to the reduction of energy consumption from fossil fuels mentioned in the SEAP.
1. Promote the
adhesion of
companies to the
voluntary
Agreement
Program
Government
Catalonia.
2. Encourage
renovation of
interior lighting
for efficient
lighting and of low
consumption in
the tertiary
sector.
3. Encourage rural
tourism houses
1. Recovery and
treatment of
urban waste.
2. Collection of
landfill biogas.
3. Program of energy
audits in the
tertiary sector.
91
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
and tourist
apartments to
install biomass
boilers.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.016 1. 0.003
2. 0.0045 ----------
1. 0.0089
2. 0.0066
3. 0.0045
1. 0.010
2. 0.242
3. ------
Transport
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in transport.
1. Construction of a
network of
bicycles lines.
2. Platform of
shared cars for
citizens who
travel in urban
displacements.
3. Dissuasive parking
outside of the city.
1. Renovation
Municipality
Fleet.
2. Replacement
actual ICE buses
by natural Gas
buses.
3. Promote green
procurement in
public contracts
and technical
documents.
1. Modification of internal mobility patterns.
2. Renewal and change of fleet by electric or alternative vehicles.
3. Improvement of the commercial speed and incorporation of the metropolitan area to the Public Transport.
1. Replace the
vehicles of the
municipal fleet
with electric
vehicles or
hybrids
2. Promote
participation of
municipal workers
in training courses
for efficient
driving.
3. Boost the use of
the electric
vehicle.
1. Develop a mobility
management system
for satisfying
demands of citizens
to travel and
reducing private
transport
2. Raise citizen´s
awareness about the
impacts that
displacement of
private vehicles
produce on climate
change.
3. Encourage the use of
bicycles as a means
of transport,
reducing motorized
92
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
journeys and
offering safe
itineraries for
circulation on
bicycle.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.011
2. 0.015
3. 0.014
1. 0.006.
2. 0.0008
3. 0.16
1.+2. 0.019
3. --------
1. 0.0002
2. 0.0006
3. 0.041
1. 0.0950
2. 0.0096.
3. 0.0058
Public lighting
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in public lighting.
1. Replacement of
obsolete exterior
lightning (Hg, Na)
by Led lightning.
1. Change of
obsoletes
luminaires by Led
2. Public Lighting
more efficient.
1. Reduction of electricity consumption by 75% in general lighting and 60% in ornamental lighting.
1. Replacement of
mercury vapor
lamps with
compact
fluorescents in
public lighting.
2. Install
astronomical
clocks in the
lighting panels
that work with
photoelectric cell.
3. Replacement of
mercury vapor
lamps with high-
pressure sodium
1. Replacement of
high pressure
sodium vapor
lamps with others
of lower power in
areas above
illuminated.
2. Implementation
of LED technology
3. Implementation
of a Control
Management
software in the
Municipal Lighting
Service.
93
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
vapor lamps in
public lighting.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in public lighting. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.003 1. 0.056 2. 0.072
1. 0.0244 1. 0.0048 2. 0.0042 3. 0.0146
1. 0.0010 2. 0.0014 3. 0.0022
Local electricity production
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local electricity production.
--------- ---------
1. Reduction of primary energy consumption through the implementation of PV systems in self-consumption regimen.
2. Increase in solar dependence on the air conditioning of sports centers and schools
1. Install PV solar panels for different consumption systems in municipal facilities.
2. Install photovoltaic solar panels in a self-consumption systems for residential and tertiary sector of the Vall d'en Bas.
1. Achieve the installation of PV panels of 5 kWp in at least 10 municipal buildings
2. Study the energy savings generated by the lighting of the seafront through solar panels.
3. Study the implementation of small-scale wind turbines to supply electricity and reduce energy dependence.
94
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local electricity production. [t CO2/ capita]
--------- ---------
1. 0.0034 2. ------
1. 0.013 2. 0.026
1. 0.00033 2. 0.00023 3. 0.00017
Local heat/cold production
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local heat/cold production.
--------- --------- ---------
1. Install biomass boilers and a heat network for domestic hot waters and the heating of various facilities and homes.
1. Identify the potential suppliers of heat and cold, and promote the construction and operation of centralized air conditioning systems from cogeneration plant.
2. Installation of solar thermal systems to produce domestic hot water to support existing facilities and improve energy efficiency in municipal dependencies.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed
--------- --------- --------- 1. 0.061 1. 0.0014
2. 0.0010
95
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
measures for CO2 reduction in local heat/cold production. [t CO2/ capita]
Industry
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in industry.
1. Public information campaigns for industrial companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures.
--------
1. Planned measures which will lead to the reduction of energy consumption from fossil fuels mentioned in the SEAP.
--------
1. Holding of a Business Forum on Climate Change within the framework of the Sustainable Energy Network through a voluntary agreement Company-City Council.
2. Creation of a certificate for companies committed to the fight against climate change.
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in industry. [t CO2/ capita]
1. 0.019
--------
1. 0.036
--------
1. 0.041 2. 0.032
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
96
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture. --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in agriculture. [t CO2/ capita]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry. --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in forestry. [t CO2/ capita]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries. --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in fisheries. [t CO2/ capita]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Funding
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Are possible sources of funding mentioned in the SE(C)AP?
YES YES YES YES YES
Three measures which require the lowest total investment costs per tonne of CO2.
1. Platform of shared cars for citizens who travel in
1. Improvement of the envelope of Municipal Schools
1. Replacement of existing thermal installations by
1. Promote participation of municipal workers
1. Creation of a certificate for companies
97
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
urban displacements.
2. Public information campaign for citizens on the importance of energy save.
3. Public information campaigns for industrial companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures.
2. Leak control Plan in Supply Municipality System of Water.
3. Change of obsoletes luminaires by Led.
systems using local biomass.
2. Modification of internal mobility patterns.
3. Progressive reduction of electricity consumption in interior lighting.
in training courses for efficient driving.
2. Guarantee the figure of the municipal energy manager and create the one of PAES coordinator.
3. Encourage the renovation of indoor lighting for efficient lighting and low consumption in the tertiary sector.
committed to the fight against climate change.
2. Raise citizen´s awareness about the impacts that displacement private vehicle produce on climate change.
3. Identify the potential suppliers of heat and cold, and promote the construction and operation of centralized air conditioning systems from cogeneration.
Stakeholders’ involvement
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Three measures that are expected to require the greatest involvement of stakeholders.
1. Improvement of
energy efficiency
of multi
residential
buildings (high
investment and
complicated
decision making)
1. Complex renovation of 5944 multi -apartment houses with the total area of 11.85 million m². Average renovation costs
1. Energy Forum once
per year to discuss
all the actual SEAP
measures with
residents
2. EE refurbishment of
private buildings
1. EE refurbishment
of private
buildings
2. Use of
environmentally
friendly transport
vehicles
1. EE refurbishment
of private
buildings
3. Use of
environmentally
friendly transport
vehicles
98
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
2. Use of RES in heat
supply (the
highest
investment)
3. Use of
environmentally
friendly transport
vehicles
approximately 100 EUR/m².
2. Elaboration of energy certificates for 5900 multi- apartment houses (energy audits) with financial aid of the Municipality covering 80% of the energy audit costs
3. Questionaires to
obtain the residents
opinion
Table 29 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SEAPs.
Table 29 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the building sector
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Public lighting
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the public lighting.
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
99
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Transport
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport.
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Local electricity production
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in local electricity production.
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Local heat/cold production
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production.
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry.
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Table 30 presents the progress of the SEAP implementation, for SEAPs for which at least one progress report has been submitted.
100
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 30 Evaluation of the implemented measures
Implementation status
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP.
1. Transport
2. Municipal
buildings and
equipment
3. Residential
buildings
4. Public lighting
5. Tertiary building
facilities.
6. Industry
1. Transport
2. Municipal
buildings and
equipment
3. Residential
buildings
4. Public lighting
5. Tertiary building
1. Transport
2. Municipal
buildings and
equipment
3. Residential
buildings
4. Public lighting
5. Tertiary building
facilities.
6. Industry.
1. Transport
2. Municipal
buildings and
equipment
3. Residential
buildings
4. Public lighting
5. Tertiary building
1. Transport
2. Municipal
buildings and
equipment
3. Residential
buildings
4. Public lighting
5. Tertiary building
facilities.
6. Industry
Greenhouse gas emission reduction
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Greenhouse gas emission reduction of the completed actions.
[% COMPLETED ACTIONS]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
The potential of the greenhouse gas emission reduction of the ongoing actions.
[% ONGOING ACTIONS]
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
The sector with the highest greenhouse gas emission reduction from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
Transport Residential Transport Residential Industry
(with tertiary)
101
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Final energy consumption
Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall D´en Bas La Coruña
Energy carrier with the highest change in final energy consumption (in percentage) from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.
FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL
102
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Detailed and thorough analysis of the pilot municipalities
103
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Moorslede
Moorslede is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SEAP will be revised to
SECAP. Moorslede has a total surface of 3 534 ha and has 11 165 inhabitants [14]. According to the most
recent available statistics [15], in 2017 635 ha of the total area is built area. Of this 80.4% is used for living,
15.7% for economical functions and 3.4% for welfare/recreation/sports. 2 771 ha is non-built area, of which
1 910 ha consists of cropland and 727 ha is grassland.
Moorslede is characterized by agricultural activity, and strongly influenced by the proximity to the REO
Auction in Roeselare (it sells fruits, vegetables and herbs in large volumes for clients in Europe, Canada, the
US and Asia. The clients are mainly retailers, exporters and wholesalers). There is outdoor cultivation and
horticulture. Also, the entire region is characterised by this, as well as by vegetable processing and freezing
industry. Furthermore, Moorslede has a few SME-zones and SME’s located in the living areas.
Geographically wise, Moorslede is located on the “Rug of Westrozebeke”, with a hilly landscape. As for the
rest of Flanders, we see the influence of “ribbon development” which means open space is developed
alongside roads. The Heulebeek is an important watercourse, and causes inundations. There is need for
space for water storage.
The climate in Moorslede (Flanders and Belgium) is a temperate sea climate which means summers are
relatively chilly (mean temperature around 20°C) and winters are rather warm (mean temperature around
0°C).
Concerning the pillars of PentaHelix, Moorslede has no knowledge institutions on its territory, nor is industry
well represented.
Information about previous experience with SEAP development for Moorslede is presented in Table 31-Table
34 for all four phases of the SEAP development.
Table 31 Initiation phase
Municipality council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?
• WVI drafted the SEAP, with a core team of a local representative (alderman on environmental issues) and a civil servant (for environment and nature). The representatives and civil servants responsible for mobility, urban planning etc. were addressed when relevant.
• Stakeholders were not directly involved in the initiation phase since the Covenant of Mayors (CoM) addresses local authorities directly. It is the council that decides whether or not to join. The province of West-Flanders and WVI both promoted CoM. WVI involved the stakeholders in the process of drafting the SEAP, in the name of the municipality and as part of the assignment to draft the SEAP.
104
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• As covenant coordinator WVI promoted CoM in its working area, in association with the Province of West-Flanders.
• The forming of groups (option 2) was done by WVI, addressing the municipalities through their existing platform i.e. “the mayors assemble”.
• In order to know the needs of the municipalities for guidance within CoM WVI interviewed 10 municipalities, during which aldermen, civil servants and the general director were present.
• Other stakeholders were not yet included in the initial face
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• In the initial phase no other stakeholders than WVI and the province of West-Flanders were included
Table 32 Planning phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• The council allocated sufficient measures to draft the SEAP.
• The SEAP (with scope 2011-2020) is taking into account the obligated sectors i.e. municipality as an organisation (own buildings, fleet and street lights), residential sector, tertiary sector and mobility as well as renewable energy on the territory.
• Before the SEAP, there was no long term vision on sustainable energy and climate. This planning was until than taken up by the national level (Flanders).
• The SEAP is aimed at the minimum requirement i.e. 20% reduction in CO2-exhaust on the territory.
105
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
• The SEAP was drafted by WVI. WVI was responsible for the baseline emission inventory, based on a national model. Flanders drafts a general baseline emission inventory every year for each municipality, starting from 2011. Municipalities only have to put in their own energy consumption data (as organisation). These data were provided by the civil servants (in collaboration with the grid operator)
• The objectives are in line with the minimum requirements of CoM.
• Municipal budgets have to be “budgetary neutral” according to European regulations and are determined at the beginning of each legislation (on local level: 6 years). After that, every year an annual account is approved. One of the main problems encountered when drafting the SEAP is that the CoM was signed after the multi-annual planning. It was not possible to have a specific budget appointed to CoM (as a global budget). Every year, of course, actions in relation to the execution of the SEAP could be integrated.
• Stakeholders were involved in the drafting of the SEAP.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
• Stakeholders were involved for each of the themes addressed in the SEAP. The following were addressed: the province of West-Flanders (different departments, according to the theme of the workshop), the grid operator, De Lijn and NMBS (public transport), Flemish department on mobility and infrastructure, social housing companies, social renting office, “woonwinkel” (intermunicipal partnership on housing) and Autodelen.net (Flemish network concerning carsharing), the “ council on environment and nature” (a local advisory board with participants from local nature organisations, agricultural sector, inhabitants,…) and the “municipal commission on spatial matters” (a local advisory board with experts and inhabitants)
106
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• They participated in workshops. Their role was giving insight in the current and future planning, working fields, actions which are relevant within CoM and advising on which goals and actions municipalities can set/take.
• WVI used its direct contacts with the stakeholders and addressed the missing organisations in order to find the correct representatives. Each stakeholder participated voluntarily.
• Political authorities approved the plan without objections.
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission reduction target (in percentage)?
• Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction?
• 20% reduction between 2011 and 2020, taking into account the BAU-scenario (without further actions, the prognosis was an increase in exhaust)
• Set as an absolute reduction
Table 33 Implementation phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?
• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?
• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?
• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatories?
• The municipal council has approved the SEAP on 11th November 2016, containing the actions until 2020 to reach the reduction target. The alderman part of the core team is following the half-yearly meetings on the elaboration of the plan.
• Every half year, WVI organises a meeting to do the follow-up of the elaboration of the plan.
• Stakeholders are involved in specific projects, dossiers e.g. construction of a cycling path, energetic renovation of public buildings,… The municipality is an active member, dependant on the type of dossier as a lead partner or involved party.
• As a representative of the municipality council, the alderman is present in the half-yearly meetings (as is the civil servant on environment and nature).
• Moorslede has a very close cooperation with the group “Klimaatoverleg Midwest”, a group of 7 municipalities who joined CoM under option 2. Moorslede wanted to be part of this group, but couldn’t since
107
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
there is no shared border between both territories (a requirement within the framework). Furthermore, there are knowledge platforms within the territory of the province, in which knowledge is shared.
Local administration
• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?
• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for energy efficiency and RES?
• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?
• For the half-yearly meetings, the administration has to collect the data concerning the actions that are being executed or planned to be. WVI organises the meeting.
• See answer above (involved in specific projects).
• Moorslede has, together with Klimaatoverleg Midwest, a communication campaign on CoM and the actions within this framework. There is a slogan and logo, communication materials are developed.
• See answer above (connection with Klimaatoverleg Midwest, knowledge platforms). Furthermore, there are regional cooperations, parnerships for example concerning housing/living (“woonwinkel”).
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?
• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?
• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?
• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?
• As also applicable to the rest of Flanders, stakeholders are taking action but the pace is to slow. E.g. inhabitants are doing energetic renovations, but the number of people doing this has to increase.
• NGO’s such as nature organisations urge for action, as well as involved inhabitants.
• In general, stakeholders are involved in the projects that are relevant for them.
Table 34 Monitoring and reporting phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?
• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?
• The municipality is on a regular basis informed by WVI, through the half-yearly meetings organised to do the follow up. It is the responsibility of the civil servant to bring the information to the board of mayor and aldermen/city council.
• The SEAP in itself is not being changed, meaning that new actions not yet
108
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
mentioned in the plan are not being integrated in the SEAP. Since the SEAP is a document approved by the city council and handed in to the CoM office, this cannot be done. Off course, they are taken along during the half-yearly meetings and they will be included in the monitoring.
Local administration
• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?
• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?
• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?
• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?
• WVI organises a half-yearly meeting concerning the execution of the plan. Every year, new data is available from Flanders i.e. a general MEI (monitoring emission inventory) is drafted for each municipality. WVI uses this data and reports it to the municipality.
• The information is distributed by WVI to the municipality i.e. the alderman and the civil servant involved within the core team of CoM.
• It is up to the persons mentioned to further inform the board of mayor and alderman/city council.
• In WVIs knowledge, the interim results are not distributed.
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?
• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?
• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?
• The data is collected by VITO (Flemish institute for technological research, a Flemish independent research organisation working on cleantech and sustainable development), commissioned by Flanders. They collect the data from the involved stakeholders.
• Stakeholders are not participating in plan updating.
• Up until now, there is no reporting directly from stakeholders. The municipalities provide the data from actions elaborated with stakeholders.
Additional remarks The data made available by Flanders is lagging 1.5 years which means this summer the data for 2016 were publicised.
Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented in Table 35-Table 38.
109
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 35 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data
CO2 emissions
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?
• Yes
• Yes
• The CO2 emissions are not presented per capita, only on municipal level
Emission factors reporting unit
• Which emission factors have been used (emission factors for fuel combustion (IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?
• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2
equivalent?
• IPCC
• Tonnes CO2
Energy consumption
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
• Yes
• Yes
• The energy consumption is expressed in MWh. In the model, some references are mentioned, which are used in calculations of impact per action e.g. the mean energy use in a dwelling per m² to calculate the impact of renovation.
Energy infrastructures
• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?
• Yes (combined heat and power)
Buildings
• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?
• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?
• No. In the SEAP, general data from Flanders is used (e.g. % of the houses not insulated, not having double glazing,...)
• No (but they are for example used in the calculations, when assessing the reduction potential during energetic renovation of dwellings)
110
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Industry
• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?
• No
Transport and mobility
• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport presented in the BEI?
• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?
• No. In the SEAP, general data from Flanders is used (e.g. % of short journeys made by car,…)
• No. During the workshop, the problems within this network were addressed directly, from the local knowledge of the persons present (local experience and knowledge).
Additional remarks The BEI is drafted according to the guidelines and templates of CoM.
Table 36 Stakeholders’ involvement
Stakeholders involvement • Are the main stakeholders’ groups
identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which
stakeholders’ groups have been listed?
• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’
involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?
• Is the level of stakeholders’ awareness
presented in the SE(C)AP?
• Stakeholders were involved for each of the themes addressed in the SEAP. The following were addressed: the province of West-Flanders (different departments, according to the theme of the workshop)(authority), the grid operator (authority), De Lijn and NMBS (public transport) (authority), Flemish department on mobility and infrastructure (authority), social housing companies (authority), social renting office (authority), “woonwinkel” (intermunicipal partnership on housing) (authority) and Autodelen.net (Flemish network concerning carsharing) (NGO), the “ council on environment and nature” (a local advisory board with participants from local nature organisations, agricultural sector, inhabitants,…) (citizens) and the “municipal commission on spatial matters” (a local advisory board with experts and inhabitants) (citizens) These stakeholders are named in the SEAP (within the description of the workshops).
• The strategy is presented in the SEAP. Stakeholders participated during the draft of the SEAP through workshops. They stay involved during the implementation of actions on project base. Citizens were
111
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
reached during the draft of the SEAP through the advisory boards that exist on municipal level (advisory board concerning environment and nature and advisory board concerning spatial matters). The ideas from both boards were investigated and included in the plan when approved by the board of mayor and aldermen. The advisory boards also advise on or help during the implementation of the actions.
Table 37 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction
Municipal buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Renovation (partial or total) of municipal buildings
• Energy performant new municipal buildings
• Investments in renewable energy on/in municipal buildings
• Purchase of 100% renewable energy
• Energy management in municipal buildings
• Awareness raising (staff and users of municipal buildings)
Potential CO2-reduction: 20% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)
Residential buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Renewing the group purchase for photovoltaic panels
• Group purchase of insulation for walls and roofs (specific for Lichtervelde and Moorslede)
• Launching a group campaign to stimulate renovation of dwellings, especifically aimed at older residents (cooperation between Moorslede and the group “Klimaatoverleg Midwest”)
• Actions towards stimulating energetic renovation of dwellings
• Cheap loan for taking energy measures in dwellings (“Flemish energy loan”)
• Actions towards stimulating the building of high energy performant new dwellings
• Stimulating the placement of photovoltaic panels on dwellings
• Stimulating energy-efficient living Potential CO2-reduction: 34% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)
112
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Co-operation between 8 municipalities (Moorslede and the group “Klimaatoverleg Midwest) to set up actions towards the tertiary sector
• Awareness raising towards the tertiary sector
Potential CO2-reduction: 11% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)
Transport
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
•
• Setting the example: greening the vehicle fleet of the municipality + setting the example by going on foot or by bike → Potential CO2-reduction: 20% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)
• Modal shift towards going by bike or on foot
• Vehicle-restricted city centers and residential quarters
• Supporting technological progress (e.g. electric vehicles)
• Car sharing
• Carpooling Potential CO2-reduction: 25% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)
Public lighting
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Dimming and turning off public lighting during the evening and/or night + energy efficient public lighting (according to urban/regional vision on public lighting)
• Capacity-building and awareness raising Potential CO2-reduction: 34% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)
Local electricity production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Supporting cooperative structures for investing in photovoltaic panels on schools
• Stimulating decentral (local) renewable energy production with the aim to reduce CO2-emissions up to 0.5% by 2020
Local heat/cold production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
No measures formulated
Industry Not integrated in the SEAP
113
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Not integrated in the SEAP
Possible sources of funding
• Which are foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP?
• Which financing sources has been are expected to have the highest share in financing proposed measures?
• Investment: 1 142 500€; exploitation: 345 900€
• with 80% local authority’s own resources, 20% national funds and programmes, 0% EU funds and programmes (no EU-project within the CoM framework in Moorslede)
Additional remarks In the template used to hand in the SEAP (EU-template) WVI have summarized the measures in several groups since the SEAP itself includes a high number of actions (some of which with a rather small scope). This summarisation is also used to fill in this table. The SEAP only contains actions for which the local government is responsible. E.g. awareness raising for energetic renovation of dwellings is included, not included is the investment inhabitants have to make during the renovation.
Table 38 SEAP implementation-indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector (e.g. number/surface area of buildings insulated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed)
Concerning municipal buildings/equipment, the grid operator delivers data concerning the energy use (electricity and gas) in a year total (a total for all buildings). Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. The energy use is given per year per sector per energy source.
Public lighting
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)
The grid operator delivers data concerning the energy use (electricity) in a year total (a total for public lighting).
114
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements is made available every year by Flanders.
Transport
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport? (e.g. the number of public transport passengers per year, total energy consumption of renewable fuels in public fleets, number of charging points)
Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. The energy use is given per year per sector per energy source. Flanders drafts this general MEI every year for each municipality, starting from 2011. Municipalities only have to put in their own energy consumption data (as organisation) to have the complete image. Flanders uses several models to make the calculations per municipality. Especially on transport, the model used changes regularly, which means that also the output differs year per year. Flanders always recalculates the MEI’s for the previous years, when delivering results for the following year (meaning that when the MEI for 2016 was made available, also the MEI of 2015 until 2011 changed).
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. capacity installed)
Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. The energy use is given per year per sector per energy source., as described above.
Local heat/cold production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production? (e.g. network extension / number of customers)
Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. Per year the production of all of the installations is totalised, as described above.
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)
Not taken into account in the SEAP
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. power installed)
Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. Per year the production of all of the installations is totalised, as described above.
Other (waste management, green public procurement, agriculture and forestry related)
Not taken into account in the SEAP, with one exception: the purchase of green electricity by a
115
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors
municipality. Every year the total is made available by the grid operator.
Data collection frequency
• What is the frequency of data collection?
Yearly collection
Funding
• Are there enough financial means for the actions?
• How will these means be sought?
On local level, funding is a bottleneck. For every new action, funding has to be approved by the council for mayor and aldermen. The means are limited, what means that according to the priorities choices have to be made. For ongoing actions, the means are reserved. Flemish subsidies are an opportunity, though also limited and connected with preconditions, which means that only a limited percentage of projects are approved. The same goes for provincial subsidies.
Additional remarks For all of the sectors this following general remark is valid: WVI uses the data made available by Flanders to make the evaluation for each municipality. This data can be seen as the MEI (monitoring emission inventory). When available, additional data is used by WVI. The Flemish data lags 1.5 years e.g. this summer, Flanders distributed the data on energy use and exhaust in tonnes CO2 for 2016, as described above.
Information about the progress of the SEAP implementation is presented in Table 39.
Table 39 SEAP monitoring overview
Status of implementation of mitigation action
• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Local heat/ cold production (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Transport (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Public lighting (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Residential buildings (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
The monitoring of the SEAP has to be executed for the first time, deadline is the end of January 2019. For the moment, the data is collected.
116
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Industry (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Others (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
Overall budget spent
• Budget (% budget spent, % overall budget foreseen action implementation)
The monitoring of the SEAP has to be executed for the first time, deadline is the end of January 2019. For the moment, the data is collected.
Estimated greenhouse gas emission reduction according to the implementation status of the actions
• Tonnes CO2/year (% completed, % new, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
The municipality received the data in December 2017 from WVI. WVI used the available data from Flanders, until 2015. In the period 2011-2015 the CO2-reduction was 4%.
Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year o the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:
• Municipal
• Tertiary
• Residential
• Public lighting
• Transport
• Non-energy related
• Industry
• Other
The municipality received the data in December 2017 from WVI. WVI used the available data from Flanders, until 2015. In the period 2011-2015 the CO2-reduction was:
• Municipal: not available since part of the tertiary sector
• Tertiary (including municipal buildings): augmentation with 3%
• Residential: reduction of 7%
• Public lighting: reduction of 12%
• Transport: reduction of 4%
• Industry: not taken into account in the SEAP
• Public transport: reduction of 12%
Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity
• Heat/cold
• Fossil fuels
• Renewables
Not calculated since the goals of CoM are reduction in tonnes CO2.
Local energy production- change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity consumption
• Non-RES electricity production
• RES electricity production
• Heat/cold consumption
Local energy production from 2011 – 2015:
• Electricity production - PV doubled: +111%
• Number of installed solar boilers: increased with 831,5% (from 19 in 2011 to 177 in 2015)
• RES Electricity production – heat/cold increased with 50%
117
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Non-RES heat/cold production
• RES heat/cold production
• RES Heat production - heat/cold increased with 50%
• There is no non-RES electricity or heat/cold production
118
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Joint SEAP for the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem, Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-Katelijne-Waver and
Willebroek
In the scope of the project joint SEAP (option 2, shared CO2 reduction commitment) will be revised to joint
SECAP. The joint SEAP applies to the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem, Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-
Katelijne-Waver and Willebroek. Together, these municipalities have about 123 103 inhabitants and cover
about 205.56 km², as it can be seen in Table 40.
Table 40 Municipalities that carry out the joint SEAP
Municipality Area Inhabitants
Berlaar 24.57 km² 11507 habitants
Bornem 45.76 km² 21186 habitants
Puurs 33.41 km² 17452 habitants
Sint-Amands 15.58 km² 8480 habitants
Sint-Katelijne-Waver 36.12 km² 20870 habitants
Willebroek 27.41 km² 26223 habitants
Historically, the region is mainly agrarian, with industrial development starting in the 1800’s. Nowadays the
region is more or less agrarian, mixed with residential areas. The houses are very decentralised. In the
municipality of Sint Katelijne Waver and Lier there is a huge amount of agriculture present, focusing on fruit
and tomatoes.
The region is situated around the small centre city of Mechelen and there is a lot of commuting to the cities.
Geographically, the region is mainly flat. It has a maritime temperate, with significant precipitation in all
seasons. The average temperature is 3 °C in January, and 21 °C in July; the average precipitation is 65
millimetres in January, and 78 millimetres in July.
It is also characterized by an extensive network of waterworks and rivers. The rivers Grote and Kleine Nete,
de Schelde and de Nete all flow through the region and still have a big influence in the region.
The Forecast of the Flemish Climate Portal of this region, is that by 2100 the median temperature will be
16,2° instead of the current 10°. It will also have 10% more chance of floods and water.
All five pillars of the PentaHelix approach are present in the municipalities but are not always represented
on a municipal level. Most are represented on a provincial level, or a nationwide level.
Information about previous experience with SEAP development for the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem,
Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-Katelijne-Waver and Willebroek is presented in Table 41-Table 44 for all four
phases of SEAP development.
Table 41 Initiation phase
Municipality council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate a sufficient human resources and
• No, the municipality councils did not provide extra preconditions to the local administration to start the process. However, there already are administrative
119
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?
structures in place. No extra human resources were however allocated.
• Stakeholder participation was not a high priority at the time. However, there was an attempt to involve industry by asking them to sign a letter of intent.
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• This part of the process is not known.
• The public authorities were consulted extensively. There was 1 regional steering group, meaning participants of all municipalities attended and 3 local Steering groups, with local stakeholders. More were planned, but no budget was left. Industry was asked to sign a letter of intent of executing the SEAP, but was not part of the decision-making process. The other three stakeholders were not consulted.
• No, this was not a priority at the time.
• Only the public authorities and their decisionmakers were widely consulted.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• Local administration (municipality departments). No other stakeholders were involved.
• They are in charge of carrying out the SEAP. The monitoring is being done by IGEMO.
• We do not know how the views of administration were conveyed to the stakeholders.
• This information is not available at this time.
Additional remarks The SEAP is joint effort of 6 municipalities around the region of Mechelen. It was drafted with the help of IGEMO as process monitor. It is a SEAP that focusses very much on the action Local Authorities themselves can take.
Table 42 Planning phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• The municipal council did allocate funds for projects that fit into the framework of the SEAP
120
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• The main priority is awareness. Lots of actions are taken to raise more awareness of the energy consumption. For example, all the mayors of the municipalities shared tips about saving in your own house.
• Yes, the priorities of the SEAP are in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality.
• The priority of the SEAP is very much focused on awareness and could be more ambitious.
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
• No, the local administration did not conduct the initial assessment. This was done by IGEMO, based on numbers provided by VITO and supplemented by information of the local administration.
• The local administration set the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable future of the municipality
• Yes, the local administration defined the measures in line with the vision;
• Yes, the local administration established the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities.
• No, the local administration didn’t involved stakeholders in the SEAP development;
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in a planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the municipality?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan? Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
• Local administration (city departments) and IGEMO
• The role of the local administration was to take part in the development of SEAP. The role of IGEMO was to be a process manager.
• They could express their views at formal meetings and by informal methods. (emailing, calling)
• Yes, they participated in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the city up to some extent
• Yes, stakeholder provided input data and shared knowledge).
• Meetings, emails, formal written communication
• Yes, stakeholder participated in the elaboration of the plan
121
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• No, they didn’t. The only decisionmakers were the local authorities themselves.
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission reduction target (in percentage)?
20% till 2020
Table 43 Implementation phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?
• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?
• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?
• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatories?
• Yes, but just formally
• No, they didn’t make sure that energy
policy is integrated into everyday life of the
local administration.
• The municipal council did encourage
stakeholders to act in small ways. They for
example lend their support to the ‘see2do’
project, whereby thermographic scans
show citizens the need to renovate their
house. This was a big success inall
municipalities: Berlaar, Sint Amands,
Willebroek, Duffel, Lier, Sint Katelijne
Waver and Puurs.
• Municipal council shows some interest; by
supporting some projects to do with the
implementation of the project.
• No, the municipal council doesn’t work on
networking with other CoM signatories
Local administration
• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?
• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for energy efficiency and RES?
• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?
• They sometimes respond to projects that
are suggested on the intermunicipal level.
• When the local administration signed the
SEAP, they asked about 100 small
businesses and organisations to sign a
letter of intent stating their support for the
SEAP. There was however no follow up.
• No, there was no information campaign.
• No, it isn’t networking with other CoM
signatories.
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?
• The local authorities are implementing some of the measures that are under their responsibility;
122
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?
• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?
• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?
• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging the
local administration to implement the
measures under its responsibility
• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging other
stakeholders to act;
• Yes, stakeholders are giving general
support to the SEAP implementation -
mainly concerned citizens.
Table 44 Monitoring and reporting phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?
• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?
• No, the municipal council isn’t asking to be
informed regularly about the advancement
of the plan;
• No, the municipal council isn’t ensuring
that plan updates occur at regular
intervals, this is done by initiative of
IGEMO.
Local administration
• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?
• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?
• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?
• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?
• No, the local administration isn’t
proceeding with regular monitoring of the
plan: monitoring the advancement of the
actions and evaluation of their impact;
• No, the local administration isn’t
periodically reporting to the political
authorities and to the stakeholders about
the advancement of the plan;
• No, there is no communication about the
results between the local administration
and the municipal council;
• No, there is no communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?
• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?
• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?
• No, stakeholders aren’t providing the
necessary inputs data
• No, stakeholders aren’t participating in
plan updating
• No, stakeholders aren’t providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility
Additional remarks While IGEMO helped make the plans,it was not a part of executing them.
123
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented in Table 45-Table 48.
Table 45 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data
CO2 emissions
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?
• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions is presented by energy carrier;
• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors.
• No, the CO2 emissions are not presented per capita. They are however presented on a municipality level.
Emission factors reporting unit
• Which emission factors have been used (emission factors for fuel combustion (IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?
• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2
equivalent?
• This information was not available
• The unit used is tonnes CO2
Energy consumption
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by energy source;
• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by sector
• No, the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment is not presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption
Energy infrastructures
• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?
• No, there are no electricity production plants.
Buildings
• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?
• No, the typology of the existing building stock is not described in the BEI.
• No, the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations are not presented in the BEI.
124
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?
Industry
• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?
• Yes, it is included, but only for non-ETS.
Transport and mobility
• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport presented in the BEI?
• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?
• No, the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport are not presented in the BEI;
• No, the main characteristics of the public transportation network are not presented in the BEI
Table 46 Stakeholders’ involvement
Stakeholders involvement
• Are the main stakeholders’ groups
identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which
stakeholders’ groups have been listed
• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’
involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?
• Is the level of stakeholders’ awareness
presented in the SE(C)AP?
• The main stakeholders’ groups are somewhat identified in the SEAP: local administration (city departments), Agriculture, industry and the tertiary sector, as well as private homes of citizens. As such, it can be said that citizens and industry stakeholders are identified in the SEAP.
• Yes. The stakeholders have been identified and it is suggested that they participate on a project-based input. For example, children and schools are taught about Energy Efficiency through the awareness actions. But there is no overreaching structure, such as a permanent advisory board.
• No, the level of stakeholder awareness is not presented in the SECAP.
Table 47 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction
Municipal buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Thorough energetic renovation of houses
• Energy saving measures (for example: awareness campaigns in schools)
• Follow up the energy consumption
125
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Residential buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Stimulate citizens to implement energy saving measures
• Stimulate energetic renovation for existing buildings
• Promote projects which are an example Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.
Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Stimulate citizens to implement energy
saving measures
• Stimulate energetic renovation for existing
buildings
• Promote projects which are an example
•
Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.
Transport
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Strengthen efficiency of public transport
• Improve infrastructure for pedestrians and bikers
• Stimulate sustainable transport behaviour Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.
Public lighting
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Reduce operating hours of public lighting
• Replace public lighting by LED
• Optimize energy-efficient control of public lighting
Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.
Local electricity production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Making up an energy opportunity card for sustainable energy
• Research the possibility to transform biomass into energy
• Introduce a smart electric network Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.
Local heat/cold production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Making up an energy opportunity card for sustainable energy
• Research the opportunity to establish a regional processing company for organic residual flows for the heat production.
Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.
Industry
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Industry is not assessed in the SEAP
126
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Agriculture: example: Promote pilot projects of energy savings
• Participation: Create a web platform for exchange of ideas and examples
Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.
Possible sources of funding
• Which are foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP?
• Which financing sources has been are expected to have the highest share in financing proposed measures?
• Possible sources of funding were not discussed in the SEAP.
Table 48 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector (e.g. number/surface area of buildings insulated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed)
• Number of buildings renovated
• Number of solar panels/heat pumps
• Total electricity and gas consumption
Public lighting
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)
• Not specified in the SEAP.
Transport
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport? (e.g. the number of public transport passengers per year, total energy consumption of renewable fuels in public fleets, number of charging points)
• Not specified in the SEAP.
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. cpacity installed)
• Not specified in the SEAP.
Local heat/cold production
• Not specified in the SEAP.
127
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production? (e.g. network extension / number of customers)
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)
• Not specified in the SEAP.
Other (waste management, green public procurement, agriculture and forestry related)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors
• Not specified in the SEAP.
Data collection frequency
• What is the frequency of data collection?
• The reporting obligations according to CoM SEAP regulation specify the obligation to report every two years.
Funding
• Are there enough financial means for the actions?
• How will these means be sought?
• This is not discussed in the SEAP.
Information about the progress of the SEAP implementation is presented in Table 49.
Table 49 SE(C)AP monitoring overview
Status of implementation of mitigation action
• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Local heat/ cold production (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Transport (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Public lighting (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Residential buildings (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Industry (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• 100% ongoing for all actions reported at the COM website (this is a summary of the actions in the SEAP)
128
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Others (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
Overall budget spent
• Budget (% budget spent, % overall budget foreseen action implementation)
• There is a big difference between the municipalities. Some have spent already more than foreseen for the entire projects. Others have spent only a little percentage.
• The municipalities do not have a good method for recording this.
Estimated greenhouse gas emission reduction according to the implementation status of the actions
• Tonnes CO2/year (% completed, % new, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• The number given here are for compleated measures in 2015, the last year of which there are available data:
o Berlaar: -11% o Bornem: -1% o Duffel + 28% o Sint-Amands: -1% o Sint-Katelijne-Waver: -6% o Puurs: +35% o Willebroek +26%
Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year o the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:
• Municipal
• Tertiary
• Residential
• Public lighting
• Transport
• Non-energy related
• Industry
• Other
• The report is still not finalized, so it was not possible to obtain requested data. Data will be available after analysis.
Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity
• Heat/cold
• Fossil fuels
• Renewables
• The report is still not finalized, so it was not possible to obtain requested data. Data will be available after energy analysis.
Local energy production- change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity consumption
• Non-RES electricity production
• RES electricity production
• Heat/cold consumption
• The report is still not finalized, so it was not possible to obtain requested data. Data will be available after energy analysis.
129
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Non-RES heat/cold production
• RES heat/cold production
130
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Velika Gorica
Velika Gorica is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which the individual SEAP will be revised
to the SECAP. The City of Velika Gorica is covering the area of 328.65 km2 and has a population of 63 517
inhabitants within the administrative area of the municipality and 31 341 that live within the urban area. It
is the largest and most populous city in Zagreb County. It is a city that has developed as a centre of the
historical region of Turopolje, but also has become one of the largest satellite cities of the capital City of
Zagreb. The meaning and connection of the City of Velika Gorica is also shown in positioning of the Franjo
Tuđman Airport, the largest and busiest airport in Croatia, within the area of Velika Gorica.
Croatia is divided into two predominant climate regions - Continental and Mediterranean although there are
some variations within those climate zones. As everywhere, Croatia's climate is determined by its geography,
which is characterised by a mixture of mountains, plains, forests and a long littoral belt.
The Croatian interior, which includes City of Velika Gorica, is separated from the coast by the Dinaric
Mountains and has a continental climate. Winters get cold, with the mean temperature in January ranging
from 0°C to -2°C. In July, the mean is approximately 22°C although strong heat waves have become more
frequent.
The mountains of Croatia such as the Velebit range and Medvednica (near Zagreb and Velika Gorica) are
cooler and get more precipitation. In winter the mean temperature ranges from -2°C to -4°C and above 1 500
m it is a few degrees colder. Snow is common in the higher elevations, providing Croatia with a ski season.
In summer the mountains are a temperate 10°C to 18°C, which makes them a pleasant escape from the
coastal heat [16].
Its economic development Velika Gorica has based on the small economy and agriculture. The largest
number of employees work in the manufacturing industry (17%) and trade (16%), followed by transport,
storage and communications (9%). The economic base is wood, food, construction, leather and graphic
industries and agriculture.
City of Velika Gorica has representatives of each of the PentaHelix pillars which will collaborate in SECAP
planning..
Information about previous experience with SEAP development for the city of Velika Gorica is presented in
Table 50-Table 53 for all four phases of the SEAP development.
Table 50 Initiation phase
Municipality council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate a sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?
• Yes, the municipality council provided the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocated human resources and provided adequate administrative structures;
• Yes, the municipality council provided the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation.
131
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• Yes, the local administration encouraged the political authorities to take the action and informed them about benefits and resources;
• Yes, the local administration allocated enough human resources and ensured that adequate administrative structures are in place;
• Yes, the local administration identified the stakeholders and decided what channels of communication/ participation they wanted to use
• Yes, the local administration informed stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collected their view
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• Local administration (city departments),Croatian craft chamber; Croatian chamber of commerce, Croatian entrepreneur association, Croatian Employer’s Association, Academia, NGOs, consumer/user associations ;
• They should be involved in the whole process of development of SEAP from the start to the end, its communication, implementation and monitoring.
• At formal meetings of stakeholder groups, they could address their views in written form and use other ways of communication;
• Their roles have been explained to them at the first meeting of stakeholders organized at the beginning of the SEAP development process.
Table 51 Planning phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the
• Yes, the municipal council ensured the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase;
• Their priority of the SEAP was to create measures that will improve energy efficiency in the city and provide at least 21% of CO2 reduction by 2020;
132
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• Yes, the priorities of SEAP are in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality;
• Their vision was rather ambitious (50.71% CO2 reduction) if all measures were implemented).
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
• Yes, the local administration conducted the initial assessment, collected the necessary data, and elaborates the CO2 baseline emission inventory
• The local administration set the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable future of the municipality
• Yes, the local administration defined the measures in line with the vision;
• Yes, the local administration established the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities.
• No, the local administration didn’t involved stakeholders in the SEAP development;
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in a planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the municipality?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
• Local administration (city departments),Croatian craft chamber; Croatian chamber of commerce, Croatian entrepreneur association, Croatian Employer’s Association, Academia, NGOs, consumer/user associations ;
• Their role was to take part in the development of SEAP from start and to influence all issues of their concern
• They could express their views at formal meetings, in written form and some other channel of communication.
• Yes, they participated in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the city up to some extent
• Yes, stakeholder provided input data and shared knowledge).
• Meetings, emails, formal written communication
• Yes, stakeholder participated in the elaboration of the plan
• No, they didn’t.
General goals
133
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• What is the overall CO2 emission reduction target (in percentage)?
21% till 2020
Table 52 Implementation phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?
• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?
• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?
• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatories?
• Yes, but just formally
• No, they didn’t make sure that energy
policy is integrated into everyday life of the
local administration.
• The municipal council didn’t encourage
stakeholders to act
• Municipal council is showing no interest;
• The municipality is showing no interest to
implement the plan;
• No, the municipal council doesn’t work on
networking with other CoM signatories
Local administration
• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?
• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for energy efficiency and RES?
• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?
• There is no coordination, because there is
no public body which would coordinate
activities;
• Yes, the response was very satisfying on
behalf of the city’s company for apartment
buildings management
• Yes, for apartment buildings’ owners
• No, it isn’t networking with other CoM
signatories.
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?
• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?
• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?
• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?
• Some of stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility;
• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging the
local administration to implement the
measures under its responsibility
• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging other
stakeholders to act;
• Yes, stakeholders are giving general
support to the SEAP implementation
134
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 53 Monitoring and reporting phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?
• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?
• No, the municipal council isn’t asking to be
informed regularly about the advancement
of the plan;
• No, the municipal council isn’t ensuring
that plan updates occur at regular
intervals;
Local administration
• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?
• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?
• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?
• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?
• No, the local administration isn’t
proceeding with regular monitoring of the
plan: monitoring the advancement of the
actions and evaluation of their impact;
• No, the local administration isn’t
periodically reporting to the political
authorities and to the stakeholders about
the advancement of the plan;
• No, there is no communication about the
results between the local administration
and the municipal council;
• No, there is no communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?
• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?
• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?
• No, stakeholders aren’t providing the
necessary inputs data
• No, stakeholders aren’t participating in
plan updating
• No, stakeholders aren’t providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility
Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented in Table 54-Table 57.
Table 54 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data
CO2 emissions
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions is presented by energy carrier;
• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors: building sector, transport, public lighting)
• Just on the municipality (city) level
135
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?
Emission factors reporting unit
• Which emission factors have been used (emission factors for fuel combustion (IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?
• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2
equivalent?
• IPCC
• Tonnes CO2
Energy consumption
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by energy source;
• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by sector
• Yes, the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment is presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption
Energy infrastructures
• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?
• Yes, district heating is presented in the BEI
Buildings
• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?
• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?
• Partially yes (usage/purpose, energy consumption)
• Yes, the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations are presented in the BEI
Industry
• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?
• No, it’s not included.
Transport and mobility
• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport presented in the BEI?
• No, the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport are not presented in the BEI;
136
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?
• Yes, the main characteristics of the public transportation network are presented in the BEI
Table 55 Stakeholders’ involvement
Stakeholders involvement • Are the main stakeholders’ groups
identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which
stakeholders’ groups have been listed
• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’
involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?
• Is the level of stakeholders’ awareness
presented in the SE(C)AP?
• The main stakeholders’ groups are identified in the SEAP: local administration (city departments), Croatian craft chamber; Croatian chamber of commerce, Croatian entrepreneur association, Croatian Employer’s Association, Academia, NGOs, consumer/user associations;
• Yes. The stakeholders have been identified and it was suggested to form an energy council and task force group for the SEAP implementation. The energy council is an advisory and monitoring body that should be formed at the early beginning of the process of SEAP development. Energy council is involving the following members: representatives of the city, of the stakeholder groups, proved energy experts from the area of energy, building and spatial planning and from transport and communal infrastructure. The main purpose of the energy council is to monitor the development, to communicate the plan (internal and external), to monitor and evaluate its implementation and to report about it to city council. The purpose of task force group is monitoring of the SEAP implementation, to develop the communication strategy, to prepare the documentation for the public procurement procedures;
• Yes, to some extent. Supervisory and working bodies have been identified – Energy council and working group and their tasks have been briefly elaborated in
the SEAP.
137
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 56 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction
Municipal buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Introduction of informational system for energy management
• Centralized data gathering for buildings (typology of the buildings, energy consumption, reconstruction data etc.)
• Remote metering of energy consumption
• Buildings registry
• Buildings energy audits
Residential buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
2 types of measures – for existing buildings and for new construction. Measures for new buildings are that Council adopts decision to reduce the level of communal fee for buildings that implement RES in different rates depending on energy standard achieved. For existing buildings:
• Co-financing of envelope reconstruction
• Co-financing of solar thermal systems for hot water preparation
• Co-financing of thermostatic valves installation
• Replacement with household devices with more efficient ones
• Installation of energy saving lamps
• Installation of small PVs up to 30 kW
Potential of CO2 reduction – 10 096 t
Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Installation of solar systems on commercial buildings
• Installation of energy saving lamps
• Council adopts decision to reduce the level of communal fee for buildings that implement RES in different rates depending on energy standard achieved in commercial sector
• Installation of small PVs up to 30 kW
Potential of CO2 reduction – 2 639 t
Transport
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Introduction of 10% of biofuels in fuel mix
• Implementation of fees for traffic pollution in the City centre
• Promotional, informational and educational activities
138
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Procurement of new vehicles for the purpose of city administration using green procurement practice
• Improvement of rail traffic
• Improvement of bus traffic
• Park and ride and bike park
• Biodiesel production support for the bus usage
• Cycling traffic improvement
• Closing the city centre for traffic
• Car sharing deployment
Potential of CO2 reduction – 10 100 t
Public lighting
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Modernisation of public lightning Potential of CO2 reduction – 287 t
Local electricity production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Local electricity production is not assessed in the SEAP
Local heat/cold production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Local heat/cold production is not assessed in the SEAP
Industry
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Industry is not assessed in the SEAP
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Other sectors are not assessed in the SEAP.
Possible sources of funding
• Which are foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP?
• Foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SEAP are:
o Public
139
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which financing sources has been are expected to have the highest share in financing proposed measures?
• local authority’s own resources
• national funds and programmes
• EU Funds and programmes o Private
• ESI funding and local authority own budget foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP
Table 57 SEAP implementation- indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector (e.g. number/surface area of buildings insulated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed)
• Number/surface area of buildings insulated [-/m2]
• Surface area of solar thermal panels installed [m2]
• Surface area of the building covered by the measuring devices;
• Number of lamps replaced;
• Surface of installed PV module (m2);
• Number of boilers replaced [-];
• Number of electrical appliances replaced [-];
• Number/surface area of buildings retrofitted [-/m2];
• Number of energy audits;
• Total annual heat and fuel energy consumption - data known from Energy Review Report (kWh / year);
• Total annual electricity consumption - data known from Energy Review Report (kWh / year);
• Total energy consumption according to Energy Review report (kWh / year);
Public lighting
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)
• Number of replaced bulbs;
• Number of working hours of old bulb yearly;
• Number of working hours of new bulb yearly;
• Smart regulation system of public lighting – implemented or not?
Transport
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport? (e.g. the number of public transport
• Number of public transport passengers (bus and train);
140
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
passengers per year, total energy consumption of renewable fuels in public fleets, number of charging points)
• Public transport network extension (km) / Number of services per day [-];
• Car classification depending on which fuel type a car should use;
• Number of city’s vehicles replaced with alternative fuel vehicles;
• Number of alternative fuel buses purchased (which kind of fuel: gas, biodiesel: gas, biodiesel),
• Fuel consumption in public transport (bus and train);
• Number of electric charging stations;
• Smart signalization (traffic lights, yellow lines for public transport);
• Cycling network extension (km);
• Number of bicycle parking spaces;
• Public bicycle system;
• Raise awareness activities;
• Number of car share vehicles and locations;
• Integrated ticketing system in public transport;
• Subsidies in public transport;
• Pedestrian zone in city center;
• Automatic park charging service in city center;
• Eco-tax for vehicles in city center;
• Park and ride train service;
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. cpacity installed)
Not relevant, as the local electricity production was not assessed in the SEAP.
Local heat/cold production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production? (e.g. network extension / number of customers)
• Extension of district heating networks – new segments and number of users;
• Capacity installed [MW] .
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)
Not relevant, as the industry sector was not assessed in the SEAP.
141
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Other (waste management, green public procurement, agriculture and forestry related)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors
Not relevant as the other sectors were not assessed in the SEAP.
Data collection frequency
• What is the frequency of data collection?
• Different for different sectors, as some of them are related to annual reporting according to national legislation. Other have reporting obligations according to CoM SEAP regulation
Funding
• Are there enough financial means for the actions?
• How will these means be sought?
• The budget of the city is limited and is not enough for implementation of all measures.
• EU programmes, ESI funds and some alternative financial instruments have been suggested.
Since the progress report for the city of Velika Gorica is still not finalized, it was not possible to obtain data about the implementation of the measures proposed in the SEAP.
142
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Våler
Våleris is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SECAP will be revised. With the
area of 257 km², the city of Våler has a total population of 5471 [8]. The Våler municipality is located within
the mountainous area in north-west of Østfold region. The total energy use of the municipality is 10 GWh/
year. The population in the municipality has shown growth since 1950, in the ten-year period 2007-17, with
an average of 2.5 per cent annually against 1.1 per cent in the County as a whole. Agriculture is dominated
by grain cultivation and livestock farming. The main industries are the food industry, manufacturing industry
and wood industry.
During the months of July and August the weather is most likely with pleasant average temperatures. Cold
season / winter normally starts from mid-October and continues in the months December, January and
February. On average, the warmest month is July and the coolest month is January. September is the wettest
month, while February is the driest month
In 2017, the municipality's operating income per capita was 74 915 NOK, while the local government
expenditure per capita was 71 768 NOK. The municipality's loan debt per capita was 39868 NOK at the same
year.
The main industries are the food industry, manufacturing industry and wood industry. Agriculture is
dominated by grain cultivation and livestock farming.
Presenters of the PentaHelix pillars in the municipality consist of regional authorities, NGOs and businesses.
Academia has no presenters in Våler.
The latest climate and energy plan of Våler municipality has approved in 2012 by the Municipality board. The
plan has ambitious goals for reducing 15% GHG emissions below the 1995 levels by 2030.
Information about previous experience with SECAP development for the city of Våler is presented in Table
58-Table 61 for all four phases of the SECAP development.
Table 58 Initiation phase
Municipality council
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholder’s participation?
• Yes, the municipality council has the necessary administrative preconditions and allocated human resources in place.
• The municipal council is aware of the importance of the stakeholder participation and is mentioning that in the climate and energy plan, however the plan has no structured procedure for involving stakeholder involvement.
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Yes, the political authorities have been informed about benefits of a climate and energy plan particularly from an economic viewpoint.
143
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• Yes, an administrative officer, a project manager and a case handler were coordinating and leading the planning process.
• No
• Yes, the draft plan has been sent out to stakeholders for getting their feedback prior to the municipal council’s approval.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• None
• Not available
• The stakeholders have provided their feedback to the draft plan but have no defined role in the implementation process.
• Not available
Table 59 Planning phase
Municipal council
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the vision previously defined?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• Yes, the municipal council have assigned three persons for leading and coordinating the planning phase.
• To utilize more environmentally friendly energy sources where local value creation and local utilization of raw materials will be the first choice.
• Yes, they were in line with the defined vision.
• Ambitious enough for a small municipality like Våler.
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the vision and the objectives that support the vision?
• Did the local administration define the policies and the measures in line with the vision and the objectives?
• Yes, all the necessary data and information have been collected from the national statistic centre.
• Yes, the vision and supportive actions have been defined.
• Yes, the plan consists of policies and measures that are relevant to the vision and objectives.
• Yes, the timing, budget and the responsibilities have been established but not the indicators.
• Yes, the local administrative did send the draft plan to the stakeholders for their feedback.
144
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
• Not available
• Not available
• By sending their feedback/comments on the draft plan.
• Not available
• Not available
• Not available
• Not available
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission reduction target (in percentage)?
15%
Table 60 Implementation phase
Municipal council
• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?
• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?
• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act?
• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?
• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatures?
• Yes, the plan is approved by the municipal council which is also a political body.
• Yes, the plan has set targets and measures for municipal operations.
• Yes
• The Våler municipality has no well-structured implementation plan.
• No
Local administration
• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?
• The Våler municipality has no well-structured implementation plan.
• Not available
145
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act?
• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for EE and RES?
• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?
• Not available
• No
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?
• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?
• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?
• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?
• Not available
• Not available
• Not available
• Not available
Table 61 Monitoring and reporting phase
Municipal council
• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?
• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?
• No
• No
Local administration
• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?
• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?
• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?
• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?
• No
• No
• No
• No
Stakeholders
146
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?
• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?
• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?
• No
• No
• No
Information about the SECAP which will be revised are presented in Table 62-Table 65.
Table 62 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data
CO2 emissions
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?
• No
• Yes
• No
Emission factors reporting unit
• Which emission factors have been used (emission factors for fuel combustion (IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?
• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2 equivalent?
• Not available
• Tonnes CO2 equivalent
Energy consumption
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user
• Yes, the breakdown is by Electricity, oil products biofuels and natural gas.
• Yes, the breakdown of transport road traffic and other traffics.
• No
Energy infrastructures
• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?
• No, however an assessment of the local capacity for the future of energy production from renewable resources is presented in the BEI
147
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Buildings
• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?
• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?
• No, there is no detail information on building stock in the plan.
• No
Industry
• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?
• The plan contains information about the energy use and emissions from industrial sector. Våler municipality has limited industrial activities.
Transport and mobility
• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility and modes of transport presented in the BEI?
• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?
• Yes, the BEI has set measures on mapping of mobility and modes of transport e.g. cycling public transport and pedestrian roads.
• No
Awareness
• Is the level of awareness of the population and stakeholders with reference to energy efficiency and potential savings presented in the BEI?
• No
Table 63 Stakeholders’ involvement
Stakeholders involvement • Are the main stakeholders’ groups
identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which
stakeholders’ groups have been listed
• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’
involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?
• Yes, public, businesses and NGOs
• No
Table 64 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction
Municipal buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Not available
• Not available
148
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Residential buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Transport
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Public lighting
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available Not available
Green public procurement
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Local electricity production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Local heat/cold production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Others (e.g. agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Not available
• Not available
149
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Industry
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Possible sources of funding
• Are the possible sources of funding listed in SE(C)AP? If so, which sources are proposed (European funds, national funds, ESCO companies etc.)
• Which financing sources has been are expected to have the highest share in financing proposed measures?
• Yes, municipal resources, also external funds like ENOVA (Norwegian government enterprise responsible for promotion of environmentally friendly production and consumption of energy.)
• The municipal sources
Additional remarks The overall emission reduction target for the Våler community is 15% reduction from the 1995 levels by 2030. However, the plan does not contain sectoral emission reduction measures, and instead it contains energy-use reduction measures.
Table 65 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators
Transport sector
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport sector?
• No indicators have defined in the plan
Public lighting
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)
• No indicators have defined in the plan
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector? (e.g. total surface of solar collectors, total electricity consumption of households)
• No indicators have defined in the plan
Involvement of the Industry (if included in the private sector SE(C)AP)
• No indicators have defined in the plan
150
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which indicators are being used to monitor involvement of the private sector in the SE(C)AP implementation? (e.g. the number of companies involved in energy services, energy efficiency and renewable energies business)
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. capacity installed)
• No indicators have defined in the plan
Local heat/cold production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production? (e.g. network extension / number of customers)
• No indicators have defined in the plan
Other (waste management, green public
procurement, agriculture and forestry related)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors
• No indicators have defined in the plan
Data collection frequency
• What is the frequency of data collection?
• No indicators have defined in the plan
Funding
• Are there enough financial means for the
actions?
• How will these means be sought?
• Yes
• All the financial means for the implementation of the measures have been allocated from the municipal budget
Information about the progress of the SECAP implementation is presented in Table 66.
Table 66 SECAP monitoring overview
Status of implementation of mitigation action
• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Local heat/ cold production (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Transport (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Not available
151
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Public lighting (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Residential buildings (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Industry (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Others (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
Overall budget spent
• Budget (% budget spent, % overall budget foreseen action implementation)
• Not available
Estimated greenhouse gas emission reduction according to the implementation status of the actions
• Tonnes CO2/year (% completed, % new, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Not available
Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:
• Municipal
• Tertiary
• Residential
• Public lighting
• Transport
• Non-energy related
• Industry
• Other
Yes, the GHG emmision change is presented for
• Buildings (Stationary combustion)
• Industry (Process emissions)
• Transport (Mobile sources)
Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity
• Heat/cold
• Fossil fuels
• Renewables
Yes (in GWh):
• Electricity
• Fossil fuels
• Natural gas
• Biofuels
152
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local energy production- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity consumption
• Non-RES electricity production
• RES electricity production
• Heat/cold consumption
• Non-RES heat/cold production
• RES heat/cold production
• Not available
Additional remarks According to Norwegian Planning Act, the municipalities should review, and possibly update their existing plans and therefore most of the municipal SE(C)AP including Våler’s SE(C)AP has no specific statement on monitoring and reporting routines. Implementation of the planned goals and measures are divided among the corresponding departments at the municipality. Each department creates its own report, and all will be collected at the end of the year for creating the annual municipal report. The progress of the planned goals/measures may be found in fragmented chapter within the annual municipal reports. In addition, in some occasions, special reports may be written on specific climate and energy projects for politicians and decision makers.
153
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Sarpsborg
Sarpsborg is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SECAP will be revised. With
the area of 405 km², the city of Sarpsborg has a total population of 55543 [8]. Sarpsborg is located at the
center of Østfold county, close to both Oslo and Sweden, and with 80 kilometers of coastline towards the
Oslofjord. Sarpsborg is an important export port; Main export goods are pulp, paper and chemical products.
Sarpsborg is an important hub on the railway; here the east and east lines of Østfoldbanen meet.
Sarpsborg enjoys milder climate than inland regions in Norway. During the months of July and August the
weather is most likely with pleasant average temperatures. Cold season / winter normally starts from mid-
October and continues in the months December, January and February. On average, the warmest month is
July and the coolest month is January. September is the wettest month, while February is the driest month.
In 2017, the municipality's operating income per capita was 75 442 NOK while the local government
expenditure per capita was 72 758 NOK. The municipality's loan debt per capita was 60 355 NOK at the same
year.
The main industrial actor in Sarpsborg is Borregaard biorefinery, which is particularly characterized by wood
processing and chemical industry. Other important sectors are food processing (including Øsfoldmeieriet and
Nortura Sarpsborg) and engineering industry (especially fabricated metal products) with respectively 29 and
17 percent of industry employment).
Presenters of the PentaHelix pillars in the municipality consist of regional authorities, NGOs, businesses,
agricultural association and public transportation. Academia has no presenters in Sarpsborg.
The latest climate and energy plan of Sarpsborg municipality has approved in 2011 by the Municipality board.
The plan has ambitious goals for reducing 50% GHG emissions below the 1991 levels by 2020.
Information about previous experience with SECAP development for Sarpsborg is presented in Table 67-
Table 70 for all four phases of the SECAP development.
Table 67 Initiation phase
Municipality council
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders participation?
• Yes, a team of administration staff with multidisciplinary background have been assigned to work with the plan.
• Yes, the local stakeholders have been informed and invited to participated in work meetings and a seminar.
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Yes, the local politicians have been invited to the planning seminar and provide their feedbacks.
• Yes, from the municipal administration.
154
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• Yes, the local energy producers, research institutes, regional authorities, industries and businesses have been involved through meetings and seminars.
• Yes, the stakeholders have been informed about the process and been encouraged to provide their feedbacks/comments to the process.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• Local businesses and industries, interested organizations, regional authorities, Farmers' Association, local energy companies and the Norwegian Society for the Conservation of Nature
• To provide their feedback/comments on the plan process, also their future development plans.
• They expressed their views through work meetings.
• The explanation has been provided in a working seminar
Table 68 Planning phase
Municipal council
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the vision previously defined?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• Yes, a team of administration staff with multidisciplinary background have been assigned to work with the plan.
• To provide information/data needed for setting the future goals and measures in reducing direct climate emissions (in transport, agriculture, industries etc.) to 50% of 1991 levels by 2020.
• Yes
• High ambitious
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the vision and the objectives that support the vision?
• Yes, the local administration did the initial job in collaboration with the consultant company named Sweco Norge AS.
• Yes
• Yes
• Yes
• Yes
155
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Did the local administration define the policies and the measures in line with the vision and the objectives?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
• Regional authorities, inhabitants, businesses/indistries and NGO’s
• To give feedback in prioritizing and setting goals and actions required for emissions reduction in the society.
• They deliver they viewpoints and comments during the planning process.
• Yes
• Yes
• Meetings, email and phone conversation
• No
• No
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission reduction target (in percentage)?
50%
Table 69 Implementation phase
Municipal council
• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?
• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?
• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act?
• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?
• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatures?
• Yes
• Yes, particularly within the internal operations e.g. replacing the fossil-based vehicles with electric cars in the municipal fleet and connecting the municipal buildings to the local district heating network.
• Yes, the municipal council is in a close collaboration with stakeholders
• They ask for status reports about the plan implementation.
• No
156
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Local administration
• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?
• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act?
• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for EE and RES?
• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?
• Not available
• Yes
• Not available
• No
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?
• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?
• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?
• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?
• The stakeholders in public sector are implementing the tasks that have been assigned to them (e.g. the regional government and national road authorities).
• Yes, in some cases for example, speeding up the installation of infrastructure for charging stations.
• Not available
• Such information is not available
Table 70 Monitoring and reporting phase
Municipal council
• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?
• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?
• There is no regular reporting procedure for the climate plan progress.
• Not available
Local administration
• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?
• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?
• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?
• No, there is no regular monitoring and reporting procedure.
• No
• No
• No
157
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?
• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?
• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?
• Yes
• No, the plan has not been updated after approving by the municipal council in 2011.
• Not available
Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented in Table 71-Table 74.
Table 71 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data
CO2 emissions
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?
• No
• Yes
• No
Emission factors reporting unit
• Which emission factors have been used
(emission factors for fuel combustion
(IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?
• Which emission reporting unit have been
used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2
equivalent?
• Not available
• Tonnes CO2 equivalent
Energy consumption
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user
• Yes, the breakdown is by Electricity, biomass, natural gas, oil products and waste.
• Yes
• No
158
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Energy infrastructures
• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?
• Yes, local production of hydropower (844 GWh/year), waste energy, both incineration and excess industrial waste heat (390 GWh/year), forestry biomass (40 GWh/year), district heating (22 GWh/year)
Buildings
• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?
• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?
• No, there is no detail information on building stock in the plan.
• No
Industry
• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?
• There is no chapter or section on industry, however, the information on energy use and emissions from industrial sector is provided in the plan.
Transport and mobility
• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility and modes of transport presented in the BEI?
• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?
• Yes, the special focus is on developing public transport, bicycle and pedestrian roads.
• Yes
Awareness
• Is the level of awareness of the population and stakeholders with reference to energy efficiency and potential savings presented in the BEI?
• No
Table 72 Stakeholders’ involvement
Stakeholders involvement • Are the main stakeholders’ groups
identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which
stakeholders’ groups have been listed
• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’
involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?
• Yes, public, businesses and NGOs
• No
159
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 73 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction
Municipal buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Residential buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Transport
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Public lighting
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Green public procurement
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Local electricity production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Local heat/cold production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Not available
• Not available
160
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Industry
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the
proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• Not available
• Not available
Possible sources of funding
• Are the possible sources of funding listed in SE(C)AP? If so, which sources are proposed (European funds, national funds, ESCO companies etc.)
• Yes, mostly from the municipal resources, also some external resources e.g. the national government.
Additional remarks The overall emission reduction target for the Sarpsborg community is 50% reduction from the 1991 levels by 2020. However, the plan does not contain sectoral emission reduction measures, and instead it contains energy-use reduction measures.
Table 74 SECAP implementation- indicators
Transport sector
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport sector?
• Total km of bicycle road network
• Total bicycle parking places
• Number of alternative fuel (pump) stations
• Number of charging stations
• Number of green cars sold
• Number of electric/biogas cars in municipal services
Public lighting
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)
• None
Building sector
161
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector? (e.g. total surface of solar collectors, total electricity consumption of households)
• Number of buildings connected to district heating
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)
• None
Involvement of the private sector
• Which indicators are being used to monitor involvement of the private sector in the SE(C)AP implementation? (e.g. the number of companies involved in energy services, energy efficiency and renewable energies business)
• None
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production?
• None
Local heat/cold production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production?
• None
Other (waste management, green public procurement, agriculture and forestry related)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors
• None (the municipality has an internal monitoring system for environmental waste management and green Public procurement, but no indicator is stated in SE(C)AP).
Data collection frequency
• What is the frequency of data collection?
• Annual
Funding
• Are there enough financial means for the
actions?
• How will these means be sought?
• No, preliminary financial estimation for implementation of some measures have been increased over time and today more financial resources are required.
• By allocating more internal resources
162
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Table 75 SE(C)AP monitoring overview
Status of implementation of mitigation action
• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Local heat/ cold production (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Transport (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Public lighting (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Residential buildings (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Industry (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Others (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Not available
Overall budget spent
• Budget (% budget spent, % overall budget foreseen action implementation)
• Not available
Estimated greenhouse gas emission reduction according to the implementation status of the actions
• Tonnes CO2/year (% completed, % new, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Not available
Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:
• Municipal
• Tertiary
• Residential
• Public lighting
• Transport
• Non-energy related
• Industry
• Other
• Not available
Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of the BEI to the most
• Not available
163
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity
• Heat/cold
• Fossil fuels
• Renewables
Local energy production- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity consumption
• Non-RES electricity production
• RES electricity production
• Heat/cold consumption
• Non-RES heat/cold production
• RES heat/cold production
• Not available
Additional remarks According to Norwegian Planning Act, the municipalities should review, and possibly update their existing plans and therefore most of the municipal SE(C)AP including Sarpsborg’s SE(C)AP has no specific statement on monitoring and reporting routines. Implementation of the planned goals and measures are divided among the corresponding departments at the municipality. Each department creates its own report, and all will be collected at the end of the year for creating the annual municipal report. The progress of the planned goals/measures may be found in fragmented chapter within the annual municipal reports. In addition, in some occasions, special reports may be written on specific climate and energy projects for politicians and decision makers.
164
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Salamanca
Salamanca is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SECAP will be developed.
The city of Salamanca lies on several hills by the Tormes River. It has a warm-summer Mediterranean climate.
Its Old City was declared a UNESCO Woorld Heritage Site in 1,988. With a metropolitan population of 144,179
and a population density of 27. Its economy is due to the famous University with more than 30,000 students
and lot of tourists. It is located 200 kilometres from Madrid and 80 km of the Portuguese border. It is
initiating the process to a tender for a technical assistant to elaborate the plan. EREN is helping them with
the emission inventory and writing of the technical and administrative tender and organising the stakeholder
task force group as well as providing energy data.
Information about current progress of SECAP development for Salamanca is presented in Table 76 and Table
77.
Table 76 Initiation phase
Municipality council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?
• Yes, but with insufficient human resources.
• Yes there will be promote and supported through a future tender- They use previous intra municipal working group for stakeholders’ group.
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• Yes.
• No but it has support from EREN and a technical assistant is foreseen
• Yes.
• Not at all. •
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• The 5 pillars of the PentaHelix
165
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• Each stakeholder has to discuss about their role and propose solutions, proposal and provide data or studies.
• Through a questionnaire, but the discussion is open to contact with EREN or Council directly.
• No, to all them yet.
Additional remarks Salamanca is initiating the process to a tender for a technical assistant to elaborate the plan. EREN is helping them with the emission inventory and the writing of the tender.
Table 77 Planning phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• Yes, but with insufficient human resources.
• Salamanca signed CoM and is committed to developing SECAP and achiving the CO2 reduction
• Yes it is.
• 3 (Between 1 to 5)
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
• Not alone, but with the support of EREN and an external expert in emission inventory.
• Yes, the local administration established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy and climate future of the municipality
• Yes.
• The local administration established the budget and financing, as well as responsibilities, but did not establish the timing and indicators.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?
• The 5 pillars of the PentaHelix
166
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
• Preparing the process to contract, planning goals and providing data.
• With questionnaire or by email, phone.
• No, by the moment only Public Authorities were included in defining the vision for the sustainable energy and climate future of the municipality
• No, by the moment.
• The process of stakeholder participation has not yet begun.
• The process of stakeholder participation is starting.
• No, by the moment.
• No, because most of the political authorities are already convenced.
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission
reduction target (in percentage)?
• Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction?
• At least 40% reduction GHG (in relation to 1990 levels).
• It Is set as an absolute reduction
Additional remarks Salamanca is initiating the process to procure the SECAP The participation of local stakeholders is foreseen in the coming months.
167
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Palencia
Palencia is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which the individual SEAP will be revised to
the SECAP.The city of Palencia is 749 m of altitude and a population of 78,892 inhabitants where are include
10 municipalities from its surroundings, and a population density of 22.3. The city is located in south of Tierra
de Campos, and lies in the north of the central Spanish plateau, the Meseta Central. Its climate is Continental
Mediterranean with very cool winters. Food industries (biscuit elaboration) have influence even in the city.
Palencia is one of the few municipalities with SEAP in Castilla y León.
Information about previous experience with SEAP development for the Palencia is presented in Table 78-
Table 81 for all four phases of the SEAP development.
Table 78 Initiation phase
Municipality council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?
• Yes, but with insufficient economical resources.
• Yes, there will use as base a previous working group for Agenda 21 for organising the stakeholders PentaHelix group.
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• Yes.
• Not yet. but it has support from EREN
• Not yet
• Not, by the moment.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• The 5 pillars of the PentaHelix
• Propose measures for the new plan, provide data and elaborate some of the SECAPs parts if it is possible.
• Not yet define
168
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• Not yet.
Table 79 Planning phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• Yes, but not foreseen financial resources yet.
• Palencia pretend to renovate CoM by 2030 commitment and update its actual SEAP.
• Yes it is.
• 4 (Between 1 to 5).
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
• Not alone. But with the support of EREN and an external expert in emission inventory.
• Yes, the local administration established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality
• They will work on the definition of the measures in line of vision after the inventory and vulnerability assessment.
• No.
• Not yet for the SECAP, neither for the previously developed SEAP.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Only Public Authorities. But it will be the 5 pillars of the PentaHelix
• Preparing the process to contract and planning goals and provide data.
• With questionnaire or by email, phone.
• No. by the moment only Public Authorities.
• Not yet.
• The process of stakeholder participation has not yet begun.
169
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission
reduction target (in percentage)?
• Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction?
• At least 40% reduction GHG (in relation to 1990 levels).
• It Is set as an absolute reduction
Table 80 Implementation phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?
• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?
• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?
• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatories?
• It has support political support for SEAP and from now for SECAPs.
• The council integrated the climate and energy sustainable policies in daily life.
• The council take into account the member from Agenda 21.
• The Council of Palencia has implemented most of the measures from its SEAP.
• The Council has not very much contact with other signatories before Pentahelix.
Local administration
• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?
• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for energy efficiency and RES?
• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?
• It has been foreseen an annual budget for implementing the action and named a technical responsible of the CoM issues in the Council.
• The council has not motivated much more the stakeholders to act.
• It was given publicity all the actions implemented in general.
• The Council has not very much contact with other signatories before PentaHelix.
170
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?
• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?
• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?
• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?
Stakeholders had not a so active role for implemented themselves actions from the SEAP.
• The council has assumed the whole responsibility to implement the measures from the SEAP.
• Stakeholders has not a very active role.
• The Council has not very much contact with other signatories before
Table 81 Monitoring and reporting phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?
• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?
Not still available
Local administration
• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?
• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?
• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?
• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?
Not still available
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?
• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?
• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?
Not still available
171
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented in Table 82-
Table 85. Table 82 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data
CO2 emissions
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?
• No
• Yes
• Municipality Level and per capita.
Emission factors reporting unit
• Which emission factors have been used (emission factors for fuel combustion (IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?
• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2
equivalent?
• IPCC
• tonnes CO2
Energy consumption
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
• Yes
• Yes
• No.
Energy infrastructures
• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?
• No exist.
Buildings
• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?
• No.
• Yes. Defined by the technical code of the building and the Regulation of Thermal Installations. National Regulations.
172
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?
Industry
• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?
• Yes.
Transport and mobility
• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport presented in the BEI?
• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?
• Yes.
• Yes
Table 83 Stakeholders’ involvement
Stakeholders involvement • Are the main stakeholders’ groups
identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which
stakeholders’ groups have been listed ?
• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’
involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?
• Is the level of stakeholders’ awareness
presented in the SE(C)AP?
• No
• No
• No.
Table 84 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction
Municipal buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)
1. Minimization energy demand for heating and
cooling as well as the promotion of RR.EE. 0.196 tCO2/capita
2. Conducting energy audits in all building. 3. Replacement oil/gas boilers to biomass in
Schools. 0.381 tCO2/capita
Residential buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)
1. . Development programs aimed at the promotion housing rehabilitation. 2.38 tCO2/capita
2. Public information campaign for citizens on the importance of energy save. 2.65 tCO2/capita
Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
173
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)
1. Public information campaigns for service and tertiary companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures. 0.016 tCO2/capita
Transport
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)
1. Integration of bicycles lines in roads. 0.011 tCO2/capita
2. Platform of shared cars for citizens who travel in urban displacements. 0.015 tCO2/capita
3. Dissuasive parking outside of the city. 0.014 tCO2/capita
4. Tax reduction for electric vehicles. 5. Free parking for electric vehicles in the city
centre. 6. Available free recharge point for electric
vehicles from the City Council.
Public lighting
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)
1. Replacement of obsolete exterior lightning (Hg,
Na) by Led lightning. 0.003 tCO2/capita
Local electricity production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)
Local heat/cold production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Industry
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)
1. Public information campaigns for industrial
companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures. 0.019 tCO2/capita
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
Possible sources of funding PUBLIC
174
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which are foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP?
• Which financing sources has been are expected to have the highest share in financing proposed measures?
1.- Local authority own resources. 2.- Regional funds (FEDER´s budget). 2.- National funds and programmes. 3.- EU funds and programmes. PRIVATE 1.- Development of agreements with companies and associations related to the energy sector, transport and renewable energy. Involve energy services companies to develop projects in buildings and public and private facilities.
Table 85 SEAP implementation- indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector (e.g. number/surface area of buildings insulated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed)
Number/surface area of buildings renovated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed,
Public lighting
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)
Number of traffic lights replaced by more energy efficiency ones, more efficient technology
Transport
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport? (e.g. the number of public transport passengers per year, total energy consumption of renewable fuels in public fleets, number of charging points)
Renewable fuels in public fleets Implementation of areas 30 km
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. capacity installed)
Power capacity of PV installed
Local heat/cold production Number of new biomass boilers, new district heating facilities
175
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production? (e.g. network extension / number of customers)
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)
Number of industries with ISO 50.001 and / or 14.001
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. power installed)
Share of renewable production; power renewable capacity installed
Other (waste management, green public procurement, agriculture and forestry related)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors?
Data collection frequency
• What is the frequency of data collection?
Only the last 5 years of energy consumption have to be available for the customer.
Funding
• Are there enough financial means for the actions?
• How will these means be sought?
Not yet. It will be follow every launch call for possibilities from financing.
Since the progress report for the city of Palencia is still not finalized, it was not possible to obtain data about the implementation of the measures proposed in the SEAP.
176
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The 7 municipalitas of Ávila
The 7 municipalitas of Ávila (Las Navas del Marqués, Solosancho, Hoyo Casero, El Barco de Avila, Papatrigo,
El Barraco, San Juan del Olmo) are the pilot municipalities of the PentaHelix project for which the joint SECAP
will be developed.
Those municipalities involve a population from 104 to 5 187 inhabitants. Most of the municipalities are
surrounded by mountains.
The province is formed by 248 municipalities which capital is the city of Ávila. Its relief is marked by the
presence to the south of the Central System, which divides it into two zones: submeseta north, and Gredos
Mountains. They characterize by a rural economy where agriculture and livestock are frequent. Due to its
orography presents a climate variation from Mediterranean tempered with dry and temperate summer to
temper with dry and hot summer. EREN is giving technical support for development the SECAPs and APEA is
organizing the stakeholder task force group for Avila municipalities.
Information about current progress of SECAP development for the 7 municipalities of Ávila is presented in
Table 86 and Table 87.
Table 86 Initiation phase
Municipality council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?
• Yes, but with insufficient human resources.
• Yes there will be organize the stakeholders group with the support of APEA-Diptacion de Avila.
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
• Yes.
• No. But that have the support of APEA- Diptacion de Avila.& EREN.
• Yes.
• Yes.
177
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• The 5 pillars of the PentaHelix
• Propose measures.
• In the meeting or email, phone.
• Yes
Table 87 Planning phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• How ambitious is their vision?
• Not really. But they have the support from APEA-DIPUTACION DE AVILA.
• •They will signed the CoM. 2 of them are in the OPTE regional platform for optimise energy consumption in public facilities.
• Yes they are
• 4 (Between 1 to 5).
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
• Not alone. But the support of EREN, APEA-DIPUTACION DE AVILA and an external expert in emission inventory.
• •Yes, the local administration established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy and climate future of the municipality
• Yes
• Yes, the DIPUTACION DE AVILA will do.
• Yes, the DIPUTACION DE AVILA will do.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable
• The 5 pillars.
• Preparing the energy planning
• With meetings or by email, phone.
• No. by the moment but they will.
• No, by the moment.
• •Phone, emails, working meetings.
• No, by the moment.
178
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
• No, because most of the political authorities are already convenced.
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission
reduction target (in percentage)?
• Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction?
The goal is not yet determined
Additional remarks The 7 municipalities of Avila recently started the process
179
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Jekabpils
Jekabpilsis the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which the individual SEAP will be revised to the SECAP. With 26 468 inhabitants in year 2009 Jekabpils was eight biggest city in Latvia. City is located in south-east of Latvia. The area of municipality is 2 553.5 ha, from whom 448.7 ha - waters, 181,2 ha - forests. The Daugava River runs through the town, and the ancient valley, branches, and islands of the river are
considered picturesque. The two historical parts of Jekabpils — Krustpils and the older part of Jekabpils —
are connected by the bridge across the Daugava River.
Information about previous experience with SEAP development for Jekabpilsis is presented in Table 88-
Table 91 for all four phases of the SEAP development
Table 88 Initiation phase
Municipality council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?
• Yes, the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place.
• Yes, the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation.
Local administration
• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?
• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?
• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?
• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?
Jekabpils city municipality's decision to introduce a certified energy management system in accordance with the ISO 50001: 2011 standard "Energy management systems. Requirements and instructions for use "(adapted to the status of the Latvian national standard as LVS EN ISO 50001: 2012) is a logical further development step to ensure continuous improvement of energy consumption and management, availability of necessary information and resources, promotion of energy efficient services and products, energy efficient design , efficient building and equipment operation, reduce energy costs in the municipality, create a safe and attractive environment for investment, and ensure the compliance of the local government with the requirements of the regulatory enactments. With the introduction of the Energy Management System, the top management undertakes to implement a policy that will: 1. providing the necessary information and
180
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
resources for achieving the objectives of the proposed energy targets and energy target; 2. Compliance with regulatory enactments and other external requirements applicable to municipal energy use, energy consumption and energy efficiency are ensured; 3. the communicative importance of the energy management system in the municipality; 4. Determination of energy management objectives and energy indicators; 5. Ensuring the compliance of the power tool indicators with the needs of the municipality, as well as measurement and reporting of the results at specified intervals; 6. Supports the purchase of energy-efficient products and services, as well as the necessary design for improvement of power tools; 7. take into account improvements to the power tool.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?
• Stakeholders are municipal corporations, producers, etc. which consume a significant amount of energy.
• So far, stakeholders are not involved in SEAP planning, but they plan different measures in their sector that affect the overall plan of the municipality.
Table 89 Planning phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?
• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?
• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• How ambitious is their vision?
Jekabpils has set targets for energy efficiency since 1995 (the Mire Pact baseline) by 2020, "to reduce CO2 emissions by at least 20% by 2020, thereby increasing energy efficiency by 20% and increasing energy use by 20% from renewable energy resources (20/20/20) "and has therefore implemented energy efficiency measures from 2009 onwards, paying particular attention to energy consumption in municipal real estate, mainly in the field of heat energy, by performing reconstruction and insulation projects for buildings, improving ventilation, heating and conditioning systems, as well as improving energy efficiency in public lighting.
181
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
It was calculated that 66 576 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in baseline year in Jekabpils municipality. Trying to reach goal of Covenant of Mayors, at least 13 315 tones of CO2 should be emitted less.
Long – term vision of Jekabpils city municipality Main challenges in achieving goals of Covenant of Mayors in Jekabpils municipality: (a) Renovation of residential buildings (b) Building new biomass CHP plant (c) Promoting of RES usage for space heating and hot water preparation. (d) Reduction of usage of transport fuel There are real ambitions for energy consumption minimization.
Local administration
• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?
• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?
• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?
• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?
• Jekabpils city municipality established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future and after that defined the the measures in line with the vision.
• At the start only major energy consumers and municipal corporations were involved.
Stakeholders
• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?
• What is their role?
• How can they express their views?
• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?
• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?
• Major energy consumers and municipal corporations are participating in the planning phase.
• Their role is to provide how many energy are consumed.
182
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?
• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?
• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?
General goals
• What is the overall CO2 emission reduction target (in percentage)?
• Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction?
• On the 18th of March, 2009 mayor of Jekabpils municipality, Leonīds Salcevičs, signed Covenant of Mayors. From that day Jekabpils municipality committed to reduce CO2 emissions, until year 2020, at least by 20 % comparing to baseline (1995) year.
• It was calculated that 66 576 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in baseline year in Jekabpils municipality. Trying to reach goal of Covenant of Mayors, at least 13 315 tones of CO2 should be emitted less.
• Year 2030 target - 30%.
Table 90 Implementation phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?
• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?
• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?
• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatories?
• Jekabpils city municipality provides long-term support due to management system.
Local administration
• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?
• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?
183
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for energy efficiency and RES?
• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?
• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?
• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?
• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?
Table 91 Monitoring and reporting phase
Municipal council (or equivalent body)
• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?
• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?
• Yes, municipal council is asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan – energy monitoring is carried out every year within the municipality, but to the general energy sector at least every 5 years.
Local administration
• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?
• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?
• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?
• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?
-
Stakeholders
• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?
• Stakeholders are providing the necessary inputs data – the necessary information about their sector.
184
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?
• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?
• Stakeholders are participating a little in plan updating.
Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented inTable 92-Table 95.
Table 92 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data
CO2 emissions
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?
• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?
• Yes, breakdown of CO2 emissions is presented by energy carrier.
• As a basis for calculation of volume of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions all kinds of energy consumption in all the territory of Jekabpils city of all the year, irrespective of the place where this energy is produced. CO2 emissions are calculated separately for electricity consumption, consumption of heat energy in district heating system, consumption of fuel for transport and final energy consumption in households, industry, state and municipal enterprises and in service sector.
Emission factors reporting unit
• Which emission factors have been used (emission factors for fuel combustion (IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?
• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2
equivalent?
From the group of gasses creating greenhouse effect only CO2 emissions are calculated. In calculation of emissions the “standard” methodology has been used and parameters from the guidelines elaborated by IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (tonnes CO2).
Energy consumption
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?
• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?
• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?
• Information about the total heat consumption in the district heating system in Jekabpils and per different consumer groups was received from the main heat supply operator. As basis for electricity consumption were taken data from joint stock company ”Latvenergo”. To estimate the structure of energy end consumption in Jekabpils the information received from the municipality was used (type of buildings and structure of property).
• For the calculation of consumption of the primary energy resources the data provided
185
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
by LR Central Bureau of Statistics were used. In those data an information has been compiled about total amount of gas, timber, coal, mazut, petrol, and diesel used in Jekabpils city. LR Central Bureau of Statistics provided data on the consumption of the primary energy resources in boiler houses as well as in cogeneration stations.
• By use of primary energy resources the consumed energy for heat supply and transport was calculated, using conversion factors from mass to energy in units (IPCC 2006).Thus the total consumed volume of energy was calculated. Distribution in separate user groups was done basing on the information provided by the municipality on the total structure of property in Jekabpils city, volume, type of use and ownership. From this equitation the procentual equitation was drawn which was used in the further calculations.
• For estimation of energy end consumption in the household sector the data were used on structure of energy consumption, number of consumers and characteristics of households from the LR Central Bureau of Statistics “Consumption of energy resources in households” ( in years 1996, 2001 and 2005). In these data there is separately shown information on energy consumption structure in Jekabpils households. Selection for the survey is made as stratified incidental selection of one or two-level households.
Energy infrastructures
• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?
• Yes
Buildings
• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?
• No - so delicately it's not looked.
186
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?
Industry
• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?
• Yes
Transport and mobility
• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport presented in the BEI?
• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?
• This sector has been analyzed and included in the inventory.
Table 93 Stakeholders’ involvement
Stakeholders involvement • Are the main stakeholders’ groups
identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which
stakeholders’ groups have been listed?
• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’
involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?
• Is the level of stakeholders’ awareness
presented in the SE(C)AP?
• In this moment, main stakeholders’ groups are not identified in the SE(C)AP.
Table 94 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction
Municipal buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
------
Residential buildings equipment/facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction (Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• By renovating 50 % of residential buildings, that are connected to district heating until year 2020, it would be possible to reduce heat energy consumption by 40-45 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 880 tones.
Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
------
187
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Transport
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• By promoting efficient driving, travel by foot and bicycle (also laying new bicycle and foot ways), promoting “car pooling”, public transport etc. it would be possible to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions at least by 5 %.
• These measures would reduce CO2 emissions by 1 000 tones.
Public lighting
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• By changing old mercury lamps to sodium ones in public lighting sector it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions by 70 tones.
Local electricity production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• It is planned to build new biomass CHP in Jekabpils municipality in 2011. In this case it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions up to 3 624 tones (electricity and heat).
Local heat/cold production
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
• By renovating district heating network, replacing old pipes to new, till year 2020 it would be possible to reduce heating losses from 26,1 % to 10 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 585 tones.
Industry
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2
emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
------
Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)
• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction
• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures
------
Possible sources of funding
• Which are foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP?
• Which financing sources has been are expected to have the highest share in financing proposed measures?
Foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP:
o local authority’s own resources o national funds and programmes o EU Funds and programmes
188
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• The highest share in financing proposed measures are from EU Funds and programmes.
Table 95 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators
Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector (e.g. number/surface area of buildings insulated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed)
Number/surface area of buildings insulated
Public lighting
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)
Number of street lights replaced by LED/or other, energy reduction
Transport
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport? (e.g. the number of public transport passengers per year, total energy consumption of renewable fuels in public fleets, number of charging points)
Number of cars, mileage, number of charging points
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. capacity installed)
Capacity installed, energy reduction
Local heat/cold production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production? (e.g. network extension / number of customers)
Energy reduction, installed power
Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number
Energy reduction, installed power
189
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)
Local electricity production
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. power installed)
Energy reduction, installed power
Other (waste management, green public procurement, agriculture and forestry related)
• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors
------
Data collection frequency
• What is the frequency of data collection?
For municipality (transport, heat, electricity, public transport, street lighting) - once a month. Local heat production, Transport, Local electricity production, ect. - every 5 years.
Funding
• Are there enough financial means for the actions?
• How will these means be sought?
No, there are not enough financial means for the actions
Information about the progress of the SEAP implementation is presented in Table 96.
Table 96 SE(C)AP monitoring overview
Status of implementation of mitigation action
• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Local heat/ cold production (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Transport (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Public lighting (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Residential buildings (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)
• Industry (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (70% completed, 0% new, 5% ongoing, 0% postponed, 5% not started)
• Local heat/ cold production (50% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing,0 % postponed, 0% not started)
• Transport (0% completed, 0% new,0 % ongoing, 0% postponed, 0% not started)
• Public lighting (10% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing, 0% postponed, 90% not started)
• Residential buildings (5% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing,0 % postponed, 0% not started)
• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (0% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing, 0% postponed, 0% not started)
190
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Others (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• Industry (0% completed, 0% not started, 0% ongoing, 0% postponed)
Overall budget spent
• Budget (% budget spent, % overall budget foreseen action implementation)
Estimated greenhouse gas emission reduction according to the implementation status of the actions
• Tonnes CO2/year (% completed, % new, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)
• In developing the Jēkabpils City Sustainable Energy Action Plan, it was calculated that in 1995 - in the base year in the city of Jekabpils, the amount of CO2 emissions was 66 573.97 tons. In order to achieve the objectives of the Covenant of Mayors, the amount of CO2 emissions should be reduced by at least 13 315 tonnes.
• In 2008, CO2 emissions amounted to 44 178.98 tonnes, which is 33.64% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995).
• In 2013, CO2 emissions amounted to 32 317.05 tonnes, which is 51.46% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995).
Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:
• Municipal
• Tertiary
• Residential
• Public lighting
• Transport
• Non-energy related
• Industry
• Other
Latvenergo AS – the leading producer of electricity and thermal energy in Latvia, supplies electricity to Jekabpils municipality. 33 477 MWh of electrical energy were consumed in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year. Therefore 3 649 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted. 25 105 MWh of electricity were consumed in Jekabpils municipality in year 2008. As a result 2 736 tones of CO2 were emitted. Due to decrement of electricity consumption, 913 tones of CO2 were emitted less in year 2008 than in baseline year. There is a potential of electricity saving in public lighting sector. By changing old mercury lamps to sodium ones it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions by 70 tones. Most heat energy in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year was consumed in residential buildings sector. Therefore, most emissions were emitted in this sector. 19 111 tones of CO2 were emitted in residential buildings sector. In industry sector – 13 363 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in year 1995. 12 568 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in tertiary buildings sector in baseline year. The least emissions were emitted in municipal buildings
191
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
sector – 7 139 tones. Overall 52 183 tones were emitted in heating sector in baseline year. During last years situation changed significantly. Due to replacement of fossil fuel to biofuel, emissions in heating sector reduced by three times. 12 118 tones of CO2 were emitted in residential buildings sector in year 2008. As it was in baseline year industry sector was in the second place by emitted emissions in year 2008 – 2 187 tones. Municipal buildings in year 2008 emitted 1 823 tones of CO2 emissions. The least emissions were emitted in tertiary buildings sector – 1 817 tones were emitted. Overall 17 946 tones were emitted in heating sector in year 2008. 30 837 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in district heating sector in baseline year. It came from heat energy production using natural gas, heating oil, coal, peat and wood. After reconstruction of boiler houses (district heating sector) over last years usage of RES increased, meanwhile CO2 emissions decreased significant. After reconstruction of boiler houses and replacement of fuel only 5 857 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in district heating sector in year 2008. Over last thirteen years CO2 emissions in district heating sector reduced by 81 %! During district heating network renovation losses were reduced from 47 % (in year 1995) to 26,1 % (in year 2009). 14 493 tones of CO2 were emitted in year 1995 from losses in heating network. After improvements made (replacement of fuel and renovation of heating network) only 1 528 tones were emitted in year 2008. CO2 emissions from district heating network losses reduced by 90 %! Potential of CO2 reduction: By renovating district heating network, replacing old pipes to new, till year 2020 it would be possible to reduce heating losses from 26,1 % to 10 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 585 tones. By renovating half of residential buildings, that are connected to district heating (~70 buildings) until year 2020, it would be possible to reduce energy consumption by 40-45 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 880 tones. It was planned to build new biomass CHP in Jekabpils municipality in 2011. Planned capacity for the new plant was 1,4 MW electricity and 6,715 MW
192
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
heat. Planned amount of heat energy produced is 26 800 MWh per year. In this case it would be possible to reduce CO2 emission up to 2 840 tones. It was calculated that 10 743 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted by different vehicles in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year. Major part of CO2 emissions came from private vehicles – 8 811 tones. Public transport in year 1995 emitted 1 916 tones, municipal fleet only 16,19 tones of CO2 emissions. Number of vehicles in Jekabpils municipality from year 1995 until year 2008 increased almost twice, while CO2 emissions increased almost twice. It was calculated that 20 144 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted by different vehicles – 16 767 tones came from private vehicles and 3 377 tones came from public transport. Overall CO2 emissions (in period 1995 – 2008) in transport sector increased by 9 401 tones. By promoting efficient driving, travel by foot and bicycle (also laying new bicycle and foot ways), promoting “car pooling”, public transport and etc. it would be possible to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions at least by 5 %. These measures would reduce CO2 emissions by 1 000 tones. CO2 emissions summary: It was calculated that in total 66 576 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year (1995). It was 2,32 tones of CO2 per capita in baseline year. Major part of CO2 emissions in Jekabpils municipality territory were emitted from heating sector – 52 184 tones. 10 743 tones of CO2 emission in municipality came from transport. The least part of CO2 emissions came from electricity used in Jekabpils municipality – only 3 649 tones. In total 40 827 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in Jekabpils municipality in year 2008. 1,5 tones of CO2 per capita were calculated in year 2008. For today situation have been changed and major part of CO2 emissions in Jekabpils municipality territory is emitted in transport sector (not in heating sector as it was in year 1995). 20 144 tones were emitted in transport sector in year 2008. 17 946 tones of CO2 emission in municipality came from heating sector. The least part of CO2 emissions (as it was also in baseline year), came from electricity sector in Jekabpils municipality – 2 736 tones.
193
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
The main goal for all cities of “Covenant of Mayors” till year 2020 is to reach 20 % reduction of CO2 emissions comparing with baseline year. As it was mentioned before 66 576 tones of CO2 were emitted in baseline year. In order to achieve goal of “Covenant of Mayors” municipality should reduce emissions by 13 315 tones until year 2020. However, until year 2008 CO2 emission in Jekabpils municipality were reduced by25 749 tones (more than 36 %). It is important to keep (or to rise) this level until 2020. Nevertheless, Jekabpils municipality still has a potential of CO2 reduction. Using all measures mentioned above it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions additionally by 6 159 tones. However, it is necessary to continue sustainable development in Jekabpils municipality. In developing the Jēkabpils City Sustainable Energy Action Plan, it was calculated that in 1995 - in the base year in the city of Jekabpils, the amount of CO2 emissions was 66 573.97 tons. In order to achieve the objectives of the Covenant of Mayors, the amount of CO2 emissions should be reduced by at least 13 315 tonnes. In 2008, CO2 emissions amounted to 44 178.98 tonnes, which is 33.64% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995). In 2013, CO2 emissions amounted to 32 317.05 tonnes, which is 51.46% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995).
Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity
• Heat/cold
• Fossil fuels
• Renewables
Electricity Latvenergo AS is the leading producer of electricity and thermal energy in Latvia. Latvenergo supplies electricity to Jekabpils municipality. In year 1995 62 % of electrical energy consumed in Latvia was produced locally (47 % form RES, 15 % from fossil fuel) and 38 % was imported. Electricity network of Jekabpils municipality was and still is integrated in the overall electricity supply system of Latvia. Electrical energy consumers in Jekabpils municipality in year 1995:
• Municipal buildings – 3 225.5 MWh/year
• Tertiary buildings – 3 216 MWh/year
• Residential buildings – 21 643 MWh/year
• Public lighting – 1 522 MWh/year
194
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
• Industry – 3 870.5 MWh/year Total – 33 455 MWh/year
In total 25 106 MWh of electricity were consumed in year 2008 in Jekabpils municipality. Regarding to year 1995 electricity consumption in Jekabpils municipality in 2008 decreased by 8 372 MWh (by 25 %). Reduction of electricity consumption can be linked to decrement of population in Jekabpils municipality (decrement of 7 % over last years) and usage of more efficient appliances Heating The current centralized heat supply system in Jekabpils has been created during the 7th and 8th decade of the past century. Since the beginning of the 10th decade when the heating supply was handed over to local government, the system has not been renovated. "Jekabpils siltums" Ltd has inherited a heat supply system, which still has to be evaluated as technically incomplete and inadequate for the current economic situation despite relatively large previous investments. However, during last fifteen years situation in heating sector, due to renovation of heating network and reconstruction of boiler houses, have improved. Heat consumption (district heating) in Jekabpils municipality in 1995 was:
• Residential buildings – 15 201.57 MWh/year
• Public buildings – 16 555,52 MWh/year
• Municipal buildings – 34 277,06 MWh/year
• Industry – 9 131,29 MWh/year Total – 75 165.44 MWh/year
In year 1995 most usable fuel in district heating sector was heating oil (62,8 %) It was used in main three boiler houses. Natural gas (15,4 %), coal (1,7 %) and peat (0,6 %) were also used in heat production. Firewood was the only one renewable energy source used in district heating sector (19,5 %). Due to reconstruction of boiler houses and renovation of district heating network, energy production in Jekabpils municipality decreased from
195
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
138 116.5 MWh in year 1995 to 74 030 MWh in year 2008 i.e. by 46 % However, local heat energy production (in decentralized buildings) increased during last 13 years. In year 1995 decentralized buildings consumed 120 408 MWh of heat energy. In year 2008 decentralized buildings used 138 036 MWh of heat energy. Energy consumption in decentralized buildings increased over 14 % during last years.
Local energy production- change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:
• Electricity consumption
• Non-RES electricity production
• RES electricity production
• Heat/cold consumption
• Non-RES heat/cold production
• RES heat/cold production
In year 1999 timber company Ltd. “Breku studenti” started to produce heat energy and supply it to local neighborhood. Two boilers, each of 1 MW capacity, for heat production use sawdust and wood chips. “Breku studenti” supply heat energy to seven multi-storey buildings and one mall. In year 2009 “Breku studenti” produced 4 703,97 MWh of heat energy. Another timber company in Jekabpils municipality Ltd. “Osukalns” heat energy production started in year 2005. “Osukalns” boiler house capacity is 5.67 MW – wood is being used for heat production. “Osukalns” sell produced energy to “Jekabpils heat” company – 10 309.1 MWh of heat energy were sold in year 2009.
196
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Conclusion This report presents the baseline assessment made for each project partner country, as well as the results
of the detailed and thorough analysis conducted for the pilot municipalities. For those pilot municipalities,
nine SECAPs will be developed by implementing the PentaHelix methodology. As can be seen from the
baseline assessment, there are significant differences in the current practice of SE(C)AP development
between the project partner countries. Those differences are most evident at the example of Norway. Even
though almost all Norwegian municipalities (95.6%) have developed energy and climate plans, only eight
action plans have been submitted to the CoM. There is also a great difference in the content of SE(C)APs.
Unlike plans developed by other partner countries, Norwegian plans do not contain measures for CO2
emission reduction. Instead of that, the action plans propose the energy-use reduction measures. As the
result, those plans do not present the potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures.
In Belgium, many municipalities form option 2 joint SE(C)APs. This implies that there is the mutual goal of
reaching CO2 reduction within the group, while one baseline emission inventory and one action plan are
being developed. However, there are differences in the way of working between the regions, since in Belgium
the support concerning CoM is appointed on the regional level.
Unlike Belgium, Croatia does not have the practice of developing joint SE(C)APs. The analysed Croatian SEAPs
show that the general level of data of those SEAPs is high. However, it can be also concluded that most of
the proposed measures for CO2 reduction are repeating in those SEAPs.
Similar like in Croatia, in Spain the majority of the municipalities develop their individual action plans. Spain
has a great number of CoM signatures (1 815) and submitted SE(C)APs (1 512). The most significant share of
the submitted action plans (around 77%) make those which are developed for the municipalities smaller than
10 000 inhabitants.
Implementation of the measures proposed in Latvian SE(C)APs is enhanced with the introduction of a
certified energy management systems in accordance with the ISO 50001. In Latvia, local heat production has
the highest share of the implemented measures. Implementation of those measures resulted with high CO2
reduction.
Majority of the pilot municipalities have previous experience with SE(C)AP development and in the scope of
the project their action plan will be revised. In their previous experiences stakeholders were (in most of the
cases) not actively involved in the development of the plan. Although in most of the cases the main
stakeholders' groups were identified, the strategy for their involvement is not presented in the action plans.
197
www.pentahelix.eu
@pentahelix_eu
Sources
[1] Belgium-Official information and service, “Federal Public Services and Public Planning Services (FPS and PPS) | Belgium.be.” [Online]. Available: https://www.belgium.be/en/about_belgium/government/federal_authorities/federal_and_planning_public_services. [Accessed: 29-Dec-2018].
[2] “Covenant of Mayors - Action Plans.” [Online]. Available: http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/actions/sustainable-energy-action-plans_en.html. [Accessed: 27-Jun-2017].
[3] Eurostat, “File:Table 1-Share of renewables in gross inland energy consumption 2016.png - Statistics Explained.” [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Table_1-Share_of_renewables_in_gross_inland_energy_consumption_2016.png. [Accessed: 21-May-2018].
[4] Eurostat, “File:Table 2-Share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy 2004-2016.png - Statistics Explained.” [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Table_2-Share_of_energy_from_renewable_sources_in_gross_final_consumption_of_energy_2004-2016.png. [Accessed: 21-May-2018].
[5] Worldometers, “Croatia Population (2018).” [Online]. Available: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/croatia-population/. [Accessed: 20-Dec-2018].
[6] Study in Croatia, “About Croatia.” [Online]. Available: http://www.studyincroatia.hr/about-croatia/geography. [Accessed: 20-Dec-2018].
[7] The Croatian Bureau of Statistics, “Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Croatia,” 2015. [8] “Statistics Norway.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ssb.no/en. [9] “Norwegian Environment Agency.” [Online]. Available: http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/en/. [10] “Government.no,” Oct. 2016. [11] “Vista Analyse.” [Online]. Available: https://vista-analyse.no/en/. [12] “LIAA.” [Online]. Available: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/en. [13] “IDEA.” [Online]. Available: http://www.idae.es/. [14] “Belgium- Official information and services.” [Online]. Available:
https://www.belgium.be/en/Online_services/app_register. [15] “Cadastre.be - La meilleure source d’information pour vos projets immobiliers.” [Online]. Available:
https://www.cadastre.be/. [16] “DHMZ - Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service.” [Online]. Available:
http://meteo.hr/index_en.php.