2
Digitalizing Business and Legislative Rules in the Norwegian Immigration Administration
14.04.2023, Tobias Vigmostad, Decisive
14.04.2023 3
Tobias Vigmostad
Previous
The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration
4
Talking points
• Norwegian Immigration Administration (UDI)• Digitalizing rules• Previous experiences with extensive rule changes• Increasing the efficiency of the casework in
immigration administration • Automation strategy• Digital structure—decisions and rules• Current use
14.04.2023
5
Norwegian Immigration Administration
14.04.2023
Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI)
• Mission– facilitating lawful and wanted immigration – ensuring that those who meet the requirements are given
an opportunity to come to Norway– control function, preventing abuse of the system
• Number of users– approx. 1200 simultaneous users– approx. 3000 unique users
• Number of cases– approx. 350,000 cases going through the system per year– approx. 200,000 cases routed through the BRMS based
decision module per year– approx. 100,000 cases handled at UDI
7
UDI in 2008
• Wants– more efficient work flow– move towards automated processes and decisions– easily exchange information with other government
agencies and key partners
• Startup of the EFFEKT-program ($90M)
• Shared solutions for all of the Immigration Administration
14.04.2023
8
What do we mean by digitalization of legal (and business) rules?
• Has become a collective term– Digital and Internet codification vs. automation– Making laws available
• Technology creates new opportunities (and challenges)– Internet codification of analog law books– What rules apply to my case– Help doing legal consideration– Automate rules
• New technology vs. traditional legal craftsmanship
14.04.2023
9
Calculator laws and rules
14.04.2023
Give some input and get an answer
10
What happened to the considerations?
14.04.2023
• In the public sector, the consideration is just as important as getting the right result
• Considerations are first-class citizens of the domain
11
What we hoped to achieve
• Business and legal should be able to manage their own rules
– No special IT-knowledge or skills needed
• Automatic rule checks where it was – wanted– prudent
• Retain execution of police power inside the government body
– Not outsource to outside IT-service providers
• Similar cases should have similar considerations and results
– Prevent unjust differences in outcome
14.04.2023
12
§ 40 Requirements residence permit for spouses
• An applicant who is the spouse of a sponsor, see section 39, shall be entitled to a residence permit where the sponsor is:
• (a) a Norwegian or Nordic national who is resident or intends to establish residence in the realm, • (b) a foreign national with a permanent residence permit, • (c) a foreign national who has or will be granted lawful residence in the realm with a residence permit that
can provide the basis for a permanent residence permit, or • (d) a foreign national who holds a residence permit pursuant to the provision of section 34 without the
system of collective protection having ended. • It is a condition for being granted a residence permit pursuant to the first paragraph that both parties are aged
18 or over. It is further a condition that a sponsor who falls within the scope of section 40 a fulfils the conditions set in that section.
• Unless particular circumstances indicate otherwise, it is a condition that the spouses shall live together. • A residence permit may be refused if it appears most likely that the main purpose of contracting the marriage
has been to establish a basis for residence in the realm for the applicant. • An applicant who does not have children from his or her relationship with the sponsor and has not lived together
with the sponsor in an established relationship in another country or in Norway may be refused a residence permit if it is most likely that the applicant or his or her children from a previous relationship will be mistreated or grossly abused. The same applies to children from a previous relationship who apply for family reunification with a parent who has been granted a residence permit without having had children with the sponsor or having lived together in an established relationship with the sponsor in another country or in Norway. The King may by regulations make further provisions in respect of the application of this provision.
• If the sponsor is granted residence in the realm after having contracted a marriage with two or more persons, only one of the persons whom he or she married may be granted a residence permit. If the sponsor is already married to a person who is resident in the realm, no residence permit may be granted pursuant to this section. If the sponsor has previously been married to another person, and it appears most likely that the former spouses intend to continue their cohabitation, a residence permit may be refused.
14.04.2023
Typical decision rule
13
Brief description of needs and solutions where BRMS is a key component
14.04.2023
Needs SolutionsClassification of cases eDiff (Find similar cases and
patterns in the portfolio)Simple cases should be easy to handle
Simple renewals
Automate considerations, decisions, and decision texts
New BRMS-supported Decision module with its own management module for rules and decision texts
Automatically exchange information with other government bodies
eExchange
14
The system must support the development of new rules and business ideas- not hinder them.
14.04.2023
• Must be easy to update the system with new rules• UDI wants «Yes can do» systems, not «No can do» systems• Rules of tomorrow are just as important as rules of today
TELL ME – WHY DON’ T WE SELL THIS PRODUCT
WHEN WE KNOW THIS IS WHAT
EVERYBODY WANTS?
BECAUSE IT’S SO CHEAP THAT IT DOESN’T PAY TO PUT IT INTO THE SYSTEM .
CAN’ ‘T WE JUST INCREASE THE
PRICE ?SORRY. SUCH A
CHANGE HAS TO BE APPROVED AT SO MANY
LEVELS THAT THE PROFIT DISAPPEARS.
URGH!IS IT THE
SYSTEM OR US WHO ARE IN CHARGE?
NO IDEA!SHALL I CHECK WITH THE ONES WHO MADE
IT?
Lunch by Børge Lund
15
Some areas are easier to automate than others
Rule complexity
Minor Major
Factcomplexity
Minor Bank Pension,Taxes
Major Criminal cases Immigration,Building code
14.04.2023
16
Is everything equally complicated?
Rule complexity
Minor Major
Fact complexity
Minor Simple renewals
Major Temporary right to work
Refugee cases from Somalia
14.04.2023
• Can we do the simple stuff easier?
17
SupercomputerSeven minutes per case
FURIOUS: Union representatives in the police are raging over new rules from the government. The machines are taking over for humans in a new solution that will decide on immigrants’ fates in Norway in seven minutes.
Union representatives are furious with the Ministry of Justice’s latest idea: starting March 1 this year, a new project will make the case working more efficient and give immigrants who are applying to extend their stay in Norway a quicker answer.
Computers are now taking over for the human case workers, following the so-called “Lean-method,” an efficiency theory originally invented for the mass production of cars.
14.04.2023
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
18
UDI’s approach to automation - complex rules and facts
14.04.2023
Decision support
Standardizing
Automation
• Gradually and continually increase automation levels• Certainty within the organization that the automated decisions are correct • Increase automation without new projects and investment needs
19
Where do the best ideas come from?
Evaluate established
practice
Idea
Approve new practice/rules
Implement new rules into
the system
Harvest the rewards
14.04.2023
14.04.2023 20
Structuring rules and decisions – meta model
Add rules to
• Evaluate terms and considerations
• Suggest result• Internal dynamics
for considerations• Check for
consistency • etc
Legal source
Permission/Outcome
Terms and considerations
Rights and obligasjons
Individual decision
21
Some gains we envisioned
• Business people can manage their own rules• Execution of police power is wholly within the grasp of
the government—not out-sourced to IT service providers
• Equivalent cases should be handled in the same way• Make the brightest, most experienced caseworkers’
know how available to everyone without delay• Short time to market; enable the business to quickly
gain experience with new rules in the system
14.04.2023
How does this work today?
• Rules update once a week– Demanding but the correct approach– Can do more if needed
• Big demand from the business people to get new rules into the system
• IT is no longer a stopper in the system
• The business people update the rules in the system themselves
22
Cases going through the new Decision Module
23
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Series2Series1
Right to stay service e-exchange
24
• UDI’s offered services based on BRMS Red IRS Blue Government Student Loans
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 -
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
Series2Series1
UDI collecting information from IRS
Januar
Febru
arMars April Mai
JuniJuli
August
Septem
ber
Oktober
November
Desember
Januar
Febru
arMars
-
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
LTOLikningsopplysninger
25
Red Collecting monthly pay-stub information Blue Last year’s tax information
UDI collecting numbers from Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration (NAV)
Januar
Febru
arMars April Mai
JuniJuli
August
Septem
ber
Oktober
November
Desember
Januar
Febru
arMars
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Aa-registeret - NAVYtelser - NAV
26 Red Collecting employment information Blue Collection benefit (welfare) information
UDI says the potential is even bigger…
• These are just some examples
• They are continually working on – Improvements– Increased usage
• Full effect scheduled 2017
27
www.decisive.no
14.04.2023 28