Download pptx - Day 3.1 - developing 2014 commitments

Developing 2014 commitmentsFiorella Polo

Partnership Meeting, 11-13 Nov., Geneva 2013

Clarissa Brocklehurst

this title seems to confuse the developent of commitments with advocacy - I'd stick to just the development of commitments

Basics:

1. ‘Creative tensions’ of 2012 HLM commitments

2. ‘Golden rules’ for dream commitments

3. Tools and support from the secretariat

3

The process of developing HLM commitments

Sector DIALOGUE

Analytical TOOLS

COMMITMENTS

4

2012 HLM commitments: a melting pot?

5

2012 HLM commitments: a melting pot?

Screen-shot on commitments from website; both circles and the histogram

Political Prioritization

EvidenceBased Decisions

National Processes

6

Creative tensions of

2012 HLM commitments

1. Too Many vs. Too Few

2. Old vs. New

3. Quick wins vs. Structural Changes

4. Broad vs. Specific

7

1. Too many vs. too few!

- Hard to advocate for- Hard to monitor - Hard to implement!

- Peceived as not ambitious!- Quantity = quality?

Too many Too few

15

15

1

2

8

2. Old vs. New

- Rooted in national plans/ existing commitments

- Favours alignment of priorities- Enables tracking by national systems

- Can shift the agenda- Can change the scale

Old New

The whole country will be100% ODF by 2015

Implement the Health Extension Workers Program on the ground

9

3. Quick wins vs. Structural

- Feasible- Visible- Reportable

• Create an inter sectorial working group

- Can make a long-term impact- Difficult to achieve in 2 yr.- Difficult to keep momentum

around

Quick Structural

• Create a WASH board that oversees WASH related ministries and reports directly to the President

• Create separate budget line for sanitation

• Allocate 1.5 Mil USD to Water

10

4. Specific vs. Broad

- Actionable- Speak to context- Monitorable at country- Hard to aggregate globat

• Create a Directorate of Sanitation within the Ministry of Health

- Can focus on the large picture

- Can be aggregated- Challenging to

monitor

Specific Broad/agreeable

• 50 Million people will gain access to sanitation

• Carry out institutional reforms in sanitation

Basics:1. ‘Creative tensions’ of 2012 HLM commitments?



12

The rules of dream


1. Few, but of quality

2. Rooted in plans, but with a new lens

3. Sequence short-term and structural

4. SWA –MART: Smart and SWA categories

1. Too few vs. too little

2. Old vs. New

3. Short-term vs. structural

4. Broad vs. Specific

2012 HLM 2014 HLM

13


‘90 second’ rule- Max. 5 commitments- Commitments tell a story to the high level

‘game-changing’ rule- Bold commitments that will carry a step-change on:

1. Sustainability2. Elimination of inequalities 3. Universal access

14

2. Rooted in plans, but with new lens

Good commitments are - rooted in existing plans- Understand bottlenecks of unfinished agenda

- Recognise shifting agenda (Universal access, tackling inequalities,

sutainabiliy, aid-effectiveness) - will be integrated in next planning

cycle

BUT

Balance Rule

15

3. Sequence short vs. long term

‘Approppriate timeframe’ rule

- Quick wins for ‘1st timers / 2 yr. periods- For 2nd timers, focus should shift to structural changes

16

4. SWA-MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

NO

Ensure coordination of sector activities

?

NO

?

?

‘SMART rule’

17

4. SWA- MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

YES

Establish over the next two years a fully formal coordination mechanism for partners jointly provided by Ministry of Health and Ministry of Public Works

YES

YES

?

?

SMART

18

4. SWA- MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

NO

Inclusion of sanitation in the political agenda

?

NO

?

?

SMART

19

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

Yes

Include Sanitation as priority in the Growth Strategy for Poverty Reduction Document (2014-2018) and Government Priority Actions Program (2014-2018)

?

Yes

?

Yes

SMART

4. SWA- MART

20

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

Yes

Include Sanitation as priority in the Growth Strategy for Poverty Reduction Document (2014-2018) and Government Priority Actions Program (2014-2018)

?

Yes

?

Yes

SMART

4. SWA- MART

24

4a. SWA Specific

• Indicate an action and who is responsible• Makes sense at country level • BUT fits into SWA CATERGORIES


Evidence Based Dec-Making

National Processes

1. Financing2. Visibility

3. Monitoring4. Transparency5. Evidence6. Linking monitoring

to planning

7. Policy & Plans8. Coordination9. Decentralization10.Human resources

25

4b. SWA Measurable

• No global/ common indicators• BUT country-specific indicator included upfront • Check for measurability by national systems

26

4c. Achievable

ACHIEVABLE:

- Consistent with progress on previous commitments

- Consistent with what other countries do- Anticipating all facets/ level off effort required

E.g.: Build knowledge-sharing networks 1yr later: centres have been built but no meny to run them!

27

4d. Relevant

Fit to fix the main problems!

Comitments reflect:1. Key sector bottlenecks – JSRs, CSOs, BAT, JSR,

GLAAS2. Progress of previous commitments - SWA update3. Country broader priorities - PSRP etc.4. Commitments in regional/global fora - AfricaSan,

SACOSAN

28

Summary: rules of dream



2. Rooted in plans, but with a new lens

3. Sequence quick quick and structural

4. SMART in SWA categories

2014 HLM

‘90 second’ rule ‘game changing’ rule

‘Balancing’ rule

‘Sequencing’ rule

‘SWA-MART’ rule

29

3. SWA- MART:

10 categories and 3 spare lenses


Evidence Based Decision Making

National Processes

1. Financing2. Visibility

3. Monitoring4. Transparency5. Evidence6. Linking monitoring

to planning

7. Policy & Plans8. Coordination9. Decentralization10.Human resources

EQUALITY

SUSTAINABILITY

UNIVERSAL ACCESS

30

The process of developing HLM commitments

SECTOR DIALOGUE

TOOLS

COMMIT MENTS

31

Market placeS

EC

TO

R

DIA

LO

GU

ETO

OL

S

1. Country Status Overviews

2. GLAAS

3. WASH BATs

5. SWA website

4. Country Status Overviews

6. Getting stakeholders together

7. Combining analysis tools

9. Aligning with regional processes

10. Linking Post-2015 country consultations

8. Balancing old and new priorities

Basics:1. ‘Creative tensions’ of 2012 HLM commitments?



33

Tools available from the Secretariat

1. Reviewing progress- New customized tools- 2014 Guidance notes

2. Planning new commitments

- Guidance notes- Webinars- SMART review

WHAT WHEN

1. Reviewing progressLive now!January

2. Planning new commitments

DecemberDecemberMarch – on demand

34

Website: Global comparisons

35

Website: Global comparisons

36

Website: Country specific

37

Website: Country specific