• Group HQ in Copenhagen, Denmark • 8 600 employees • Turnover: 23,3 billion DKK (2014) • One of the largest Nordic Networks • Covers 80 % of the business
areas in the region • 1 800 points of presence • Subsidiaries in Sweden and Norway • Extended reach
• Finland • Baltics, Iceland, Faeroe Islands,
Greenland • Continental Europe & the UK
TDC in the Nordic region
2
4
Global IP-traffic 2014 – 2019, Exabytes
2023
2629
324048
58
72
161172417
112
90
2019 2018 2015 2014
+24%
2016 2017
60
4
72
3
88
109
135
168
Managed IP
Fixed Internet
Mobile data
Source: Cisco VNI 2015
All words ever spoken by
humans ~ 5 EB
5
Global Datacenter traffic 2014 – 2019, Zettabytes
Source: Cisco Global Cloud Index*
* http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/global-cloud-index-gci/Cloud_Index_White_Paper.html#Trend1_Global_Data_Center_IP_Traffic
10
9
8
6
5
3
2016 2014 2015
+19%
2017 2018 2019
DC traffic, ZB
• DC to use • DC to DC • Within DC
6
DC community have a big focus on the Nordic countries. General - Energy price, low cooling needs due to climate - Environmentally positive produced energy - Stable political environment Most discussed and mentioned - Sweden - Finland - Norway - Iceland
- Alliances within each country to promote certain areas
- Ireland also of interest due to tax regulations
Data Center focus on area/landmass
7
Market cap DC & Cloud services in the Nordics, MSEK
Source: IDC
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
MSEK
Denmark
+15%
Norway
Finland
Sweden
2012 2011 2015 2017 2014 2016 2013 2018
1 Euro = 9.5 SEK
8
How does the Telco add value to the DC?
• The “Big ones”, Facebook, Amazon, Google..... - Build their own DC - Lease or lay own fiber and build own infrastructure on top, (typical DWDM/Packet infrastructure)
- So far, Only carry their own generated traffic • All the others, DC houses/space providers - Often no Telco operator coordination - But still want to have high quality connectivity partners - Wish to rent/lease capacity, typically produced on/by operators xWDM/Packet system
Type of DC’s
9
How does the Telco add value to the DC?
Do we have to make a choice?.... ….NO… - The DC Community need both - Data Centers will have different type of customer and thereby the connectivity demands will vary Where will they fit? - DWDM/OTN base for high capacity/latency demanding applications - Packet base for “other” applications - P-OTN, The best combo?
OTN vs. Packet Transport
10
How does the Telco add value to the DC?
Client 1G - > 10G- > 100G….. ->? - 10G up to 150km on black fiber from Backbone POP, or extended by xWDM metro - Relatively inexpensive
- 100G up to 40km on black fiber from Backbone POP - Expensive HW (CFPx ER)
- xWDM metro extension also expensive - Will the Customer/DC come closer the carrier’s POP? probably not
- The Carrier’s main network/POP has to come to the Customer/DC
- Expand main network are not “for free” - Are we able to build a business case here?
Connectivity challenges
11
...What about your communications capabilities...?
How does the Telco add value to the DC?
....Our DC has fiber from the local provider to the facility, even dual
entries…
12
How does the Telco add value to the DC?
The local fiber is just the “pit lane”. The complete network and the equipment in it decides how fast you can go and how the vehicle
handles…
But, what is really important is connectivity and performance to reach more than just local
13
How does TDC support datacenter connectivity needs?
How does the Telco add value to the DC?
- With a high quality & availability Layer 1 (1.5) DWDM/OTN network - Low and predictable latency
- Located on DC facilities - Capacity from GE to 100G - Redundant and Diverse routes - Protection mechanisms - Base for Layer 2&3 services, x-VPN
~ 0,7 Billion People accessible within 35 ms
TDC DWDM/OTN Network – RTD*
5 ms
10 ms
20 ms
35 ms
* RTD - Round Trip delay, is the time it takes for data to be transmitted through the network and back again
London Telehouse Building East Telehouse Building North Telecity Harbour Exchange
Amsterdam Telecity Kuiperbergweg Level3 Joop Geesinkweg NIKHEF (IP)
Bruxelles Interoute Leuvensesteen- weg
Frankfurt Equinix (FRS) Kleyerstrasse Interxion Weissmüllerstrasse/ Hanauer Landstrasse
Hamburg Next ID Wendenstrasse
Oslo TDC2 Hans Möller Gasmannsvei TDC3 Nydalen TDC5 Prestegaten
Helsinki Helsinki, Lautasaari Helsinki, Pasilia Finnish-Russian border, Imatra Finnish-Russian border, Vainikkala
Copenhagen Interxion Industriparken, Ballerup TeliaSonera, Sydvestvej, Glostrup Global Connect Hørskætten, Tåstrup
Paris Level3 Avenue des Nations 227 Tremblay
Stockholm Telecity Bromma, Sköndal Interxion Esbogatan, Kista Digiplex
14
Wrap-up
- Data growth drives DC and connectivity
requirements, and they co-exist
- Latency is a often “key factor” in the DC market,
where customers expect their data to be available
and at their fingertips
- The complete network gives the performance –
the chain is no stronger than its weakest link
16