Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dealing with Organized Labor [whether unionized or not! ]
Chapter 15
15-1
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
History of Unions
U.S. Labor Unions:
15-2
Legally unprotected until 1935 [strikes and related activities considered illegal restraint of trade under antitrust laws]
Unions widely supported in 1930s [world-wide labor movement—historical context]
Not supported as much today due to offshoring in certain industries, economics
Employers prefer a nonunion workforce [compare/contrast employment at will]
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Legal Environment
3 Most Important Laws
1) Wagner Act (1935)
2) Taft-Hartley Act (1947)
3) Landrum-Griffin Act (1959)
[Others—e.g., RLA]
15-3
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1) The Wagner Act [Original NLRA]
Sets up National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Independent federal agency Certifies elections Investigates unfair labor practice charges [see text, p. 467, for specific
provisions] Can issue cease & desist order if employer:
Interferes w/ union formation/administration Discriminates against union members [cf. “salting”] Refuses to bargain with the union
15-4
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
2) Taft-Hartley and 3) Landrum-Griffin Acts
∎ Taft-Hartley Act [text at p. 468]∎ Protects mgmt. & workers from union coercion∎ Prohibits discrimination re: non-union status∎ Illegal for union not to bargain in good faith∎ Allows individual states to bar shop clauses &
establish “right to work” states [see web link]
15-5
∎ The Landrum-Griffin Act [text at p. 469]∎ Protects union members from union
leaders∎ Requires unions bill of rights and
constitution∎ Regulates union elections and finances
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Labor Relations in the U.S. Adversarial Labor-Management Relations Shrinking Union Membership [private sector]
15-6
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Labor Relations in Other Countries
15-7
France—more politically involved China—low political and economic
involvement Sweden—high both politically and
economically Germany:
Works Councils—joint committees Codetermination—union on board of
directors Japan:
Enterprise Unions—all workers in company
System fostered by “lifetime” employment [on the decline due to economic realities]
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Labor Relations Strategy
Two Basic Strategies Union Acceptance Union Avoidance
Union Substitution Union
Suppression
15-8
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Labor Relations Process
Union Organizing Union solicitation Pre-election conduct Certification election Employee Free Choice Act
[passage seems unlikely; political hot potato much like TEAM Act--see Case 15.3; more discussion later]
15-9
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Collective Bargaining
Bargaining Behavior Must negotiate in “good faith” Both sides develop and present
proposals, continue to impasse
15-10
Bargaining Types Distributive Integrative Shirtless [Putin only ]
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Guidelines for Integrative Bargaining
Try to understand others’ needs/goals Create a free flow of information Emphasize commonalities Minimize differences Search for solutions that meet all parties’
goals and objectives Develop flexible responses to proposals Avoid entrenched “positions” vs. interests Seek to enlarge the “pie” vs. bigger share
15-11
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Bargaining Topics Mandatory
Wages, hours, and conditions of employment
15-12
Permissive Both parties must agree to add to
agenda E.g. board service, retiree benefits Shop clauses, no subcontracting
rules Illegal
Featherbedding Discriminatory practices, etc.
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Impact of Unions on HRM
15-13
Staffing – seniority based [vs. merit]
Compensation Higher in union shops [cf. “2-tier”
systems] Benefits generally better in union
shops Prefer across the board raises (e.g.,
COLAs) Employee Relations [compare “at-
will”] Union gives employees a voice;
disputes can be resolved short of termination
Job design—Team structures involved with management may be limited [Case 15.3]