cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 1
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment
EuromoduleFood Safety and Risk Assessment
Arja Siebenga, Hogeschool van Arnhem en NijmegenVersion 1, oktober 2004
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 2
Contents Unit 4
• Introduction• The Food Supply Chain and Traceability• Legislation and Food Safety Agencies
– Codex Alimentarius– Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) agreement– EU Food Safety Legislation
• International quality systems– Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)– ISO 9000 (at this moment ISO 9001:2000)– EUREP-GAP– British Retail Consortium (BRC)– Safe Quality Food
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 3
Introduction
• There is concern on Food Safety Hazards among consumers and also among producers (see Unit 1)
• Caused by:– Food Poisoning incidents and subsequent Recall
actions– Food comes from all over the world and so the
production is an uncertain factor
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 4
Introduction
• Consumers and Producers want safe and high quality food in the supermarkets, shops and marketplaces
• Consumers and Producers want: – Legislation and food safety control– Quality systems– A safe Food Supply Chain
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 5
Precautionary principle
• Consumers and Producers want to prevent food hazards and incidents, so Authorities want to take precautionary measures
• The European commission took her responsibility and published the White Paper in 2000, after the Green Paper
• See: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub06_en.pdf
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 6
White Paper
• The European Commission, which wants to assure that the EU has the highest standards on food safety, published the White Paper on Food safety with a proposal for a European Food Authority and Food Safety Legislation
• The principles of the White Paper:– To cover the whole of the food chain “farm to table”
– To use the precautionary principle where appropriate
– To be able to trace products through the whole food chain if necessary
– To use scientific advice
– To appropriate official controls and rapid action on emergencies
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 7
New EU General Food Law
• Has regulations for:• Supply Chain Management (SCM) • Control Systems and• Transparency and Traceability in food processing chains for
eventual problems and subsequent recalls• Quality systems
• Is based on worldwide trade and legislation:• Codex alimentarius• Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures (SPS) agreement of
the World Trade organization (WTO)
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 8
The Food Supply Chain
• Includes:– Primary production (agricultural)– Food processing– Food trade; wholesale and retail– Catering– Consumers; they drive the chain (demand
chain)
Bourlakis M.A. eds. (2004), Food Supply Chain Management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 9
The Food Supply Chain
Farmers – Agricultural Producers
Food and drink
manufacturing
Wholesaler
Catering Retailer
Consumer
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 10
The Food Supply Chain
• The management environment of the chain:– Quality; the degree of congruence between customers expectations
and their realization
– Technology; in agricultural production, food manufacturing and distribution
– Logistics; a key business process that provides increased customer satisfaction
– Information technology; supports the movement of products and product information dissemination in the food chain
– Regulation framework; based on (inter)national law
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 11
Traceability
• The ability to track and/or trace product flows in a production and distribution chain
• It implies that product flows are uniquely identifiable and at critical points in the production and distribution processes, the identity of product flows is logged
• This information is systematically collected, processed and stored.
Vernède, R., Verdenius, F. and Broeze, J., (2003) Traceability in Food Processing Chains. KLICT Position Paper, Agrotechnology & Food Innovations, Wageningen.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 16
Traceability
• From January 1st 2005
• Every company in the Food sector
• Must be able to perform T&T: in own warehouse one participant in the chain before one participant in the chain after
Most important points of T&T (art. 18 General
Food Law):
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 17
Traceability
• Is for all food related products
• Each company is responsable for their choice of batch size
Most important points of T&T (art. 18 General Food Law):
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 18
Legislation and Food Safety Agencies
• The Codex Alimentarius, the SPS (Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures) agreement and the General Food Law:– Aim– Set up of the legislation / system– Control and sanctions– Administration and organization
www.globalfoodnetwork.org/pdf/InternationalReportDefinitief2.pdf
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 19
Codex Alimentarius Programme - Aim
The main purposes are:• Protecting Health of the consumers• Ensuring fair trade practices in food trade• Promoting co-ordination of all food standards
work from international governmental and non-governmental organizations (harmonization).
ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/standard/en/CXP_001e.pdf (the Codex document)
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 20
Codex Alimentarius Programme Set up of the system
The Codex Alimentarius is a collection of:• Food standards• Codes of practice• Other recommendations presented in a uniform way
Example: Recommended International Code of Practice;This code recommends a HACCP-based approach to enhance Food
Safety
This is a code for all food processing companies, there also is a codex for a type of product or process
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/standard_list.asp (a list of all existing codex)
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 21
Codex Alimentarius Programme Set up of the system
There are also guidelines in the Codex for:
• Production
• Processing
• Marketing and
• Labelling
Example: for niche products or special foods, there is the Codex for organically produced foods.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 22
Codex Alimentarius ProgrammeControl and Sanctions
There is no organization that controls the Codex; each country in the world has its own responsibility and for each Codex has the choice of:
• Full acceptance• Acceptance with minor deviations or• Free distributionAn increasing number of countries are aligning there national food standards with those of the Codex Alimentarius, particularly in the case of additives contaminants and residues.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 23
Codex Alimentarius ProgrammeOrganization
The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) was created in 1963 by:
• Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO)• World Health Organisation (WHO)
The secretary of the Codex Alimentarius Commission is a senior FAO official who serves as the Chief of the Joint FAO / WHO Food Standards Programmes located within the Food and Nutrition Division at FAO in Rome.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 24
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Agreement: Aim
The basic aim of the SPS agreement is to maintain the sovereign right of any government to provide the level of health protection it deems appropriate, but first of all to ensure that these sovereign rights are not misused for protectionist purposes and do not result in unnecessary barriers to international trade.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 25
SPS AgreementSetup of the system
The World Trade Organisation (WTO) agreement is based on seven principles which the member states of the WTO have to follow:
1. National sovereignty2. Harmonisation3. Equivalence4. Science-based measures5. Regionalisation6. Transparency7. Dispute resolution.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 26
SPS AgreementControl and sanctions
• Only governments can submit trade disputes to the WTO’s disputes settlement
• By accepting the WTO agreement, governments have agreed to be bound by the rules in all of the multilateral trade agreements attached to it including the SPS agreement
• In case of trade dispute there is the WTO’s dispute settlement procedure and the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB).
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 27
SPS AgreementAdministration and organisation
• The SPS committee is open to all member countries
• Look for literature concerning the dispute between European Countries and the United States of America on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s)
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 28
EU Food Safety LegislationAim
To establish and maintain high level protection of human health, safety and consumer protection
So the General Food Law is the only of the three agreements whose only purpose is the consumer and his health, safety and legal protection
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 29
EU Food Safety LegislationSet up of the legislation
The General Food Law consists of:• Directives; A number of guidelines that can be
transformed into national laws, there is some space for adaptation to the specific national situations. Example: Obligation of the manufacturer to establish a self monitoring system in accordance with the HACCP concept.
And• Regulations; They should be taken over literally by the
member states. Example: Food and food ingredients must be traceable
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 30
EU Food Safety LegislationControl and Sanctions
• Control is a responsibility of the local government
• The EU can assign a European Inspection Team that examines if a member state acts according to the rules.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 31
EU Food Safety LegislationAdministration and organisation
The European Community has several bodies for legislation matters:
• European Food Safety Authority; scientific advice
• Council of Ministers; decision-making on final legislative matters
• European Parliament; legislation and control.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 32
International Quality Systems
The most important quality systems:• Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)• ISO 9000 (at this moment ISO 9000:2000)• EUREP-GAP• British Retail Consortium (BRC)• Safe Quality Food.
We will discuss:• Description of the system• Aim• Set up of the system• Control and Sanctions• Advantages and disadvantages.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 33
Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)
• The HACCP system is the system that is required for any food business or organisation in most countries by legislation.
• The joint FAO / WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission recommends the HACCP approach to enhance Food Safety.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 34
Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)
The Aim:
“HACCP is a tool to assess hazards and establish control systems that focus on prevention rather then relying mainly on end-product testing on food safety”
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 35
Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Set up of the system:
• HACCP is a science based system– With 7 principles, for example “Conduct a
hazard analysis”– And 12 guidelines, for example “List all
potential hazards associated with each step, conduct a hazard analysis and consider any measures to control identified hazards.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 36
Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)
• Control on HACCP is part of the control of the legislation; in EU that is General Food Law based legislation in each country
• Sanctions depend on the different legislations and are enforced in EU by the Food controlling organisation in each country.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 37
Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Advantages• Gives insight in the critical control points of
the process• Gives trust for the consumer that products
are produced safely and hygienically• Decreases chance on recall• Decreases number of desired audits;
saves money• Reduces the costs of food borne illness.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 38
Hazard Analyses Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Disadvantages:• Increased production and supervisory costs• Need to train supervisors managerial and
production staff• Attitude / Motivation of all• Reduced Staff time available for other tasks• Costs of implementation• Reduced flexibility in production process and
introduction of new products.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 39
ISO 9000 (at this moment ISO 9000:2000)
ISO systems are:• Generic {for all types of organisations producing
all kinds of products or services in any sector of activity (profit, non-profit or public)}
• Management systems (there is a minimum of operational order so that time, money and other resources are utilised efficiently)
• Standards (providing the organization with a model for setting up and operating the management system).
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 40
ISO 9000 (at this moment ISO 9000:2000)
The Aim / result of ISO 9000 is:“Transparency of the processes so the
organization can deliver measurable output.”
The system is frequently revised. The last time was in the year 2000, so we currently use ISO 9000:2000, which was published in 2001
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 41
ISO 9000:2000
The revised system consists of:• ISO 9000 Quality Management System (QMS):
Principles and Definitions• ISO 9001 QMS: Requirements• ISO9004 QMS: Guidelines for performance
improvement• ISO 19011 Guidelines for auditing QMS.
www.iso.org
www.Irqa.nl
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 42
ISO 9000:2000
ISO has no Control itself but:• conformity assessment is a matter for suppliers
and their clients in private sector• when ISO standards have been incorporated into
public legislation, regulatory bodies execute the assessments
Many testing laboratories and certification bodies offer independent (“third party”) conformity assessment services.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 43
ISO 9000:2000
Sanctions can be used for misleading practices such as:
• Misuse of the ISO logo, which is a registered trademark
• Giving the false impression, through expression such as “ISO certification”
• Giving the false impression that ISO 9000 is a product quality label.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 44
ISO 9000:2000
Basic Advantages:• The meeting of regulatory requirements• The meeting of customer needs• The model ISO 9000 makes for a company
seeking to formalize their management system of quality assurance.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 45
ISO 9000:2000
Important disadvantages:• ISO 9000 is not a specific food safety system
and does not necessarily ensure food safety and does not require an HACCP plan to be completed to meet the standards
• The actual change of operations can be very expensive (Designated employees have to be trained and take classes and spend time to train fellow employees)
• Companies sometimes feel that the existing set of operational procedures is already working well and so the need to change is not felt.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 46
EUREP-GAP
EUREP stand for Euro-Retailer Produce working group and is a platform in which the major European food retailers are grouped.
The Aim:“The objective is to raise standards for the
production of fresh products such as fruits vegetables and livestock”.
www.eurep.orgwww.eurep.net
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 47
EUREP-GAP
EUREP supports the principles of and encourages the use of HACCP
EUREP-GAP for fruit and vegetables is developed by all kinds of representatives from the fruit and vegetables chain. Growers are obliged to comply with national and international laws.
Growers have to show commitment to:• Food safety• Reduction of environmental damage• Reduction of the use of pesticides• Efficient use of natural resources• Health and safety for employers.There is a strong focus on traceability.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 48
EUREP-GAP
Set up of the system:EUREP has developed a protocol for Good Agricultural Practice for fresh fruit and vegetables.
EUREP has also developed a protocol “Integrated Farm Assurance” Livestock and Combinable Crops.This is a guide to standards of EUREP.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 49
EUREP-GAP
• The EUREP-GAP approval is received after a verification from a verification body and there must be at least one internal inspection a year.
• A significant number of retailers only allow fruit and vegetables with EUREP-GAP certificate.
When less then 95% of the “minor musts" is fulfilled the certificate will be temporarily suspended.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 50
EUREP-GAP
Advantages:Reducing Food Safety Risks in Global Primary Production
by means of:• Encouraging the development and adaptation of
national and regional farm assurance schemes• Reducing costs of compliance• Increasing the Integrity of farm assurance schemes
world wide.
Disadvantages:• Regulations are quite broad and general• It is an industry initiative focused on business-to-
business rather than consumer orientated.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 51
British Retail Consortium (BRC)
BRC took the initiative to formulate common standards to inspect suppliers providing retailers with food.
Aim:With a BRC-certificate producers satisfy all demands that British supermarkets require at once. Because this lowers the cost for customers and producers both with regard to inspection cost this concept is valued broadly.
www.agriholland.nl
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 52
British Retail consortium (BRC)
Set up of the system:BRC requires suppliers to have a quality system
operational, the application of HACCP, including process, staff and product, and finally environmental demands should be met
It consists of: - Inspection protocol (used by the organiza-
tions controlling the suppliers)- Elaborated checklist for the suppliers itself.
A supplier can achieve two levels; foundation and a higher level.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 53
British Retail Consortium (BRC)
ControlA couple of accredited organizations are allowed
to certify companies.
SanctionsShortcomings of the norm can be divided into
three categories:1. Critical (blockade)2. Major (improvement reports)3. Minor (recommendations)
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 54
British Retail Consortium (BRC)
Advantages:1. In the international context BRC is widely known2. Suppliers have less audits3. Audits are more standardized4. Suppliers can stress their strengths and indicate on
which level they are operating5. Mainly HACCP based
Disadvantages:1. Very extensive checklist (more than 200 control points)2. Some items are typically English.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 55
Safe Quality Food (SQF)
SQF is an Australian initiative that focuses on Food safety, product quality and the stimulation of improvement strategies.
Aim:1. To raise standards of Food Safety and quality across the food
chain2. To continuously improve and deliver high standards of customer
services3. To continue to pursue increased recognition of SQF Management
Systems by customers and client in new existing markets4. To maintain and protect the high level of integrity of SQF Codes.
www.sqfi.com
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 56
Safe Quality System (SQF)
Set up of the system:• SQF 1000 Quality Code: a simple HACCP-
based supplier approved system for primary producers
• SQF 2000 Quality Code: a user-friendly quality assurance system specifically tailored for food businesses
• SQF 3000 Quality Code: a system focused on retailers, especially for biological, chemical and physical contamination.
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 57
Safe Quality Food (SQF)
Advantages:1. Very complete system, certified companies easily
obtain other certificates2. Assessed by officially accredited organizations3. Broad reputation is an advantage for exporting
companies4. SQF label can be used as a marketing instrument5. Enabling tool for producers, manufactures and
distributors to demonstrate “due diligence” and traceability
6. Proven way for Supply Chain to increase market share
cont
ents
Unit 4: Food Legislation and Risk Assessment 58
Safe Quality Food (SQF)
Advantages continued:• Internationally recognized• Management system that allows
implementation of operational efficiencies.
Disadvantages:1. SQF certification is not automatically a HACCP
certification2. Not always clear for customers what product
quality issues are covered.