Page 1 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Consuelo Mendez Middle School
2013-2014 Campus Improvement Plan
Austin Independent School District
Page 2 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
CIP CHECKLIST AND CONFIRMATION
Completed
() CIP Items
The current membership of the CAC is reported correctly.
The methods of orientation for new CAC members are reported correctly.
3 The approximate hours spent on CIP development are reported correctly.
The inclusion of district-required action plan objectives was correctly assessed comparing inclusion criteria to campus level and performance.
The CAC was given an opportunity to provide input on the campus needs assessment.
The CAC was given an opportunity to provide input on the campus objectives and strategies to address identified needs.
The CAC was given an opportunity to provide input on the approach to setting campus performance targets.
The CIP action plan component pertaining to campus professional development was approved by the CAC.
The CAC was given an opportunity to review the complete draft CIP prior to submittal.
The CAC was given an opportunity to provide input on the campus budget.
We Confirm the Above Information …
Position Name Date
Principal Ronald N. Gonzales 9/30/13
Co-Chair Judith Campos 9/30/13
Co-Chair Lena M. Gaither 9/30/13
Page 3 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Austin Independent School District Strategic Plan 2010-2015
The Campus Improvement Plan directly supports the AISD Strategic Plan. Mission In partnership with parents and our community, AISD exists to provide a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society. Vision AISD will be nationally recognized as an outstanding school district, instilling a passion for life-long learning in all students. Values Focus on Children Excellence Integrity Equity Respect Health and Safety
Goals
1. All students will perform at or above grade level. 2. Achievement gaps among all student groups will be eliminated. 3. All students will graduate ready for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy. 4. All schools will meet or exceed state accountability standards, and the district will meet federal standards and exceed state
standards.
Page 4 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
CAMPUS ADVISORY COUNCIL: Current Membership
Non-Voting Members Name Principal Ronald N. Gonzales
Voting Members Name
CAC Co-Chair
()
CAC Sec. ()
PTA Pres. ()
ClassroomTeacher
()
SpEd Expertise
()
Other Prof. Staff Member
(Give Title) Parent Delores Moreno
Parent Lena M. Gaither – 8th grade parent
Parent M. Alvarez – 8th grade parent
Parent R. Cazares – 6th grade parent
Parent G. Diaz-Lopez – 7th grade parent
Parent M. Garcia – 8th grade parent
Professional Staff Member Sheryl Holmes Math Dept Chair
Professional Staff Member Latasha Wilson CATE Dept Chair
Professional Staff Member Shawna Garcia LArt Instructional Coach
Professional Staff Member Judith Campos LArt Dept Chair
Professional Staff Member Lauren Benoit Science Dept Chair
Professional Staff Member Angela Williams Math Instructional Coach
Professional Staff Member Latoiya Williams Social Studies Dept Chair
Classified Staff Member Jessica Sosa Parent Support Specialist
Student (If Applicable)
Student (If Applicable)
Business Representative Amber Welch United Way
Community Representative Ricardo Zavala Dove Springs Community Laison
Page 5 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
CAMPUS ADVISORY COUNCIL: CAC Database Information
Email Addresses of CAC Co-Chairs Staff Co-Chair Non Staff Co-Chair
Schedule for Regular CAC meetings: Normal Day of the Month (e.g., 2nd Tuesday): 2nd Thursday of the month Normal Time: 5:30 - 6:45 pm
CAMPUS ADVISORY COUNCIL: Orientation of New CAC Members
According to CAC Bylaws, the principal shall ensure that new CAC members receive orientation to service. Indicate the type(s) of orientation provided to new CAC members.
Check Any As Applicable
()
Method of Orientation
Self-Orientation Using Materials on CAC Website Orientation at CAC Meeting (Provided by Campus) Orientation at CAC Meeting (Provided by Central Office) District-Wide Orientation Session
CAMPUS ADVISORY COUNCIL: Level of Participation in 2013-2014 CIP Development
The CAC must have opportunities for meaningful involvement in CIP development. Indicate the approximate hours spent on 2013-2014 CIP development. At a minimum, this must include: (1) opportunities for the CAC to provide input on the campus needs assessment, the campus objectives and strategies to address identified needs, and the approach to setting campus performance targets; (2) CAC approval of the action plan component pertaining to campus professional development; and (3) CAC review of the complete draft CIP prior to submittal.
Approximate Hours Spent on CIP Development By CAC and/or
CAC Subcommittees By Campus Administration
and/or Leadership Team 3 hours 40 hours
Page 6 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
CAMPUS-IDENTIFIED ACTION PLAN FOR 2013-2014
CAMPUS NEEDS ASSESSMENT
The following data were reviewed: STAAR Data 2013 Staff/Faculty survey results 2013
Based on review of the above data, the following areas of needed improvement were identified:
ELLs who need to meet passing standard on Reading and Math STAAR African-American students who need to meet passing standard on Math STAAR 7th graders who need to meet the passing standard on Writing STAAR 8th graders who need to meet the passing standard on Social Studies STAAR Reduce special education identification rate Reduce the rate of African American students identified for special education Reduce the rate of special education students in discretionary OSS settings Increase the percentage of special education students who take the regular STAAR test in all subject areas Decrease the percentage of special education students who take the STAAR-M test in all subject areas
ACTION PLAN TO ADDRESS CAMPUS-IDENTIFIED NEEDS Table #CI-1 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: 70% of ELLs who meet passing standard on Reading and Math STAAR/EOC Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
In order to improve teacher quality and deepen the role of the learner teachers will differentiate instruction, check for understanding and monitor student progress through PLC professional development which will focus on the following instructional strategies: 1. Teach Like A Champion Essential Techniques (increase time on task) 2. Framework and Kagan Cooperative Learning Structures (increase student engagement) 3. AVID WICR/Cornell notes (increase student engagement and higher level thinking 4. Literacy strategies including reading and writing across the curriculum. 5. The Simple Sentence; Building Grammar – 7th grade (Grammar resource)
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Williams, Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Book: Teach Like a Champion KAGAN framework
Lesson plans PLC meeting agenda, minutes. Posted anchors of support Interactive notebook entries Assessment data
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Ensure teachers are attending professional ESL Department Ms. ELL dept information Lesson plan documentation June 2013 – June Ongoing
Page 7 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
development trainings that support linguistic and content advancement of ELLs including ELPS at a Glance, SIOP training, Processing Text, and any others available on the Human Capital Platform.
Salas, Ms. Campos, Mr. Monfries, Mr. VerHalen Ms. Gonzales Supervising Administrator Rebecca Ramirez
Language Arts Support Team Member Human Capital Platform
Completed walkthrough and data analysis PLC minutes
2014
Analyze and monitor data (i.e. TELPAS, district benchmarks and STAAR data and other assessments) to meet the needs of ELLs in the instruction and apply appropriate accommodations in daily instruction and assessment throughout the year.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Assessment data
Data Analysis sheets PLC/Team meeting notes Lesson plan documentation Classroom walkthroughs SE intervention pacing charts Lesson plans for interventions
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Conduct collaborative planning sessions via PLC’s, with the ESL department as to ensure pace/scope of curriculum.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
PLC meeting notes Team meeting notes Lesson plan documentation Classroom walkthroughs
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers will identify those struggling students and provide proper interventions. They will utilize class time to pull small groups to focus on specific linguistic skills as needed and ELL identified students will also attend academic camps which will utilize differentiation techniques.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Linguistic accommodations from LPAC ELPs toolkit
Tutorial lesson plans Documented ELP strategies on plans Student assessment List of linguistic accommodations for ELL’s Walkthrough logs reflect ion of usage
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers will use the CRMs as a planning tool during PLCs, team planning.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
CRMs Lesson plan documentation classroom walkthroughs team notes Deconstructed TEKS
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Ensure that teachers attend Strategies for ELLs, Reading in the Content, ELPs Academy and Newcomer Immigrant/Refugees professional development sessions as available.
Supervising administrator, Ms. Ramirez
Human Capital Platform Professional development documentation Walkthroughs
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers will utilize school-wide Math strategies and problem solving guide to empower students. Students will learn how to utilize the problem solving board when solving word problems. Problem solving boards will be posted in every classroom.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Problem Solving Boards Completed Problem solving boards posted Notes in the Interactive Notebook Cornell Notes
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Create opportunities for students to Principal, Ron Gonzales, Intervention logs Teacher Intervention logs June 2013 – June Ongoing
Page 8 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
participate in campus wide interventions for math via campus tiered intervention lessons, using teacher created pacing calendars, based on misconceptions and gaps.
Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Copies
denoting when a child received intervention or tutoring. Intervention pacing calendars. Maverick Trails . Quintiled documents
2014
Students will participate in numerical fluency practice in order to become better versed at simple number operations/sets.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Numerical fluency activity sheets
Graded sheets Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Students will be provided the CSI, spiraled warmups to ensure that they are covering all TEKs objectives through daily practice.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
CSI notebooks from AISD Proper completion of CSI warmup notebook Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Teachers will implement strategies from Keys to Literacy to engage student s in a variety of text types.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Professional development Lesson plan documentation of strategies Walkthrough forms noting strategies
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Teachers will implement strategies from Any Given Child to engage student s in their learning via drama based instruction
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Lead Teachers Ms. Griego, Ms. Guajardo, Teachers
Professional development Lesson plan documentation of strategies Walkthrough forms noting strategies
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
To better address the needs of students the Kilgo model will be used to deconstruct student expectations by identifying the academic verb, vocabulary, content and context in order to address academic rigor.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
KILGO training “Deconstructing student expectations”
Walkthrough data Lesson plans
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Page 9 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #CI-2 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performanceObjective: Increase by 10% African-American students who meet passing standard on Math STAAR/EOC Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s):
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
In order to improve teacher quality and deepen the role of the learner teachers will differentiate instruction, check for understanding and monitor student progress through PLC professional development which will focus on the following instructional strategies: 1. Teach Like A Champion Essential Techniques (increase time on task) 2. Framework and Kagan Cooperative Learning Structures (increase student engagement) 3. AVID WICR/Cornell notes (increase student engagement and higher level thinking
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams.Teachers
Book: Teach Like a Champion KAGAN framework
Lesson plans PLC meeting agenda, minutes. Posted anchors of support Interactive notebook entries Assessment data
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers will utilize school-wide Math strategies and problem solving guide to empower students. Students will learn how to utilize the problem solving board when solving word problems. Problem solving boards will be posted in every classroom.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Problem Solving Boards Completed Problem solving boards posted Notes in the Interactive Notebook Cornell Notes
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Create opportunities for students to participate in campus wide interventions for math via campus tiered intervention lessons, using teacher created pacing calendars, based on misconceptions and gaps.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Intervention logs. Intervention pacing calendars. Maverick Trails . Quintiled documents.
Teacher Intervention logs denoting when a child received intervention or tutoring. Intervention pacing calendars. Maverick Trails . Quintiled documents.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Students will participate in numerical fluency practice in order to become better versed at simple number operations/sets.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Numerical fluency activity sheets
Graded sheets Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Students will be provided the CSI, spiraled warmups to ensure that they are covering all TEKs objectives through daily practice.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms.
CSI notebooks from AISD Proper completion of CSI warmup notebook Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Page 10 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Williams, Teachers Teachers will implement strategies from Any Given Child to engage student s in their learning via drama based instruction
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams Lead Teachers Ms. Griego, Ms. Guajardo, Teachers
Professional development Lesson plan documentation of strategies Walkthrough forms noting strategies
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
To better address the needs of students the Kilgo model will be used to deconstruct student expectations by identifying the academic verb, vocabulary, content and context in order to address academic rigor.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams and Teachers
KILGO training “Deconstructing student expectations”
Walkthrough data Lesson plans
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Collected data at the end of every six weeks will determine professional development and teacher support needed to help increase teacher knowledge and skills.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams and Teachers
Data PLC meeting notes/feedback Assessment data
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Table #CI-3 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: At least 70% of 7th grade students will meet passing standard on Writing STAAR Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s):
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
In order to improve teacher quality and deepen the role of the learner teachers will differentiate instruction, check for understanding and monitor student progress through PLC professional development which will focus on the following instructional strategies: 1. Teach Like A Champion Essential Techniques (increase time on task) 2. Framework and Kagan Cooperative Learning Structures (increase student engagement) 3. AVID WICR/Cornell notes (increase student engagement and higher level thinking 4. Literacy strategies including reading and writing across the curriculum. 5. The Simple Sentence; Building Grammar – 7th grade (Grammar resource)
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Book: Teach Like a Champion KAGAN framework
Lesson plans PLC meeting agenda, minutes. Posted anchors of support Interactive notebook entries Assessment data
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
To better address the needs of students the Principal, Ron Gonzales, KILGO training Walkthrough data August 2013 – June Ongoing
Page 11 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Kilgo model will be used to deconstruct student expectations by identifying the academic verb, vocabulary, content and context in order to address academic rigor.
Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
“Deconstructing student expectations”
Lesson plans 2014
Teachers will utilize appropriate resources: Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) Standards, Curriculum Road Maps, (CRM’s) Collaborative Planning Tool, Lesson Plan Template and the Kilgo planning and Understanding by Design (Ubd) process to create pacing calendars, unit plans, and lessons that are cognitively aligned with the TEKS and SE’s in all content areas.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Posted content and language objectives in student language Posted TEKS/ELPS, higher order questions, and the daily agenda PLC meeting agenda, minutes, and sign in sheets Lesson plans classroom walkthroughs
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers, instructional coaches and administrators will utilize an array of data sets (heat maps, item analysis from campus, district and state assessments, and quintile categories by student STAAR raw scores) to verify student mastery of taught concepts and content, inform core instruction, identify needed professional development to support and improve teacher pedagogy, and determine student interventions that are timely and specific
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Maverick Trail copies Assessments
Data from diagnostic assessments Data conference sign in sheet Intervention lesson plans Maverick Trails student entry
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Create opportunities for students to participate in campus wide interventions for writing via campus tiered interventions.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
SIS program School Net program Maverick Trails sheet
Intervention lesson and pacing calendars Intervention lesson plans Increased progress on all assessments Maverick Trails chart
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
7th grade students will be scheduled to participate in a Writing Elective everyday. In this class teachers will monitor student performance on writing class work, writing tests, and writing common assessments. Teachers will provide tiered writing interventions for students who are not successful.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Genre Study PD & materials Simple Sentence: grammar resource
Intervention tutoring logs Intervention pacing calendars Maverick Trails Lesson Plans
July 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
All students will participate in the 800 Word challenge to increase vocabulary automaticity.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.
800 Word Challenge materials PD by Rosa Waters
Student activity books Student assessments Student completion of the challenge
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Page 12 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Table #CI-4 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: 70% students will meet passing standard on Social Studies STAAR Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s):
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Teachers will utilize school-wide reading strategies and empower students to use these tools which will be posted in classrooms. Word wall/banks will be utilized to reflect academic vocabulary.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Teachers
Word Walls/Banks posted Lesson plan documentation
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers will participate in course failure meetings with their PDAS appraiser and discuss student passing rates, failure rates, and interventions necessary to increase or improve student learning.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Teachers Registrar Ms. JMartinez
Agenda Copies of teacher action plans Grade reporting reports
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Students will be recognized at the end of every six weeks for outstanding grades at the End of Six Weeks Awards Assemblies.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Teachers
Certificates Ribbons Teleparent communication
Report cards
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Students will utilize student interactive notebooks to collect notes, foldables, quizzes, visuals to assist in their learning and assessments.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Teachers
Interactive notebooks provided by district/school
Annotated/completed interactive notebooks. An increase in those who pass assesments, including SCAs, quizzes, MOYs
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
To better address the needs of students the Kilgo model will be used to deconstruct student expectations by identifying the academic verb, vocabulary, content and context in order to address academic rigor.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Teachers
KILGO training “Deconstructing student expectations” – Ms Garcia
Walkthrough data Lesson plans
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Page 13 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
DISTRICT-REQUIRED ACTION PLAN FOR 2013-2014 REQUIRED FOR ALL CAMPUSES Table #DR-1 Objective: Students and staff will achieve health and fitness through, as appropriate: implementation of the Coordinated School Health Program (K-8); student participation in moderate to vigorous physical activity; compliance with the Wellness Policy; and completion of the Fitnessgram testing for all students in grades 3-12. Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Students in grades K-8 will pass the identified skill movement, physical activity, health concept, and social development assessments.
PE Department (Ms. Friede, Ms. Washington, Mr. Medrano, Mr. Katz)
Gradespeed program Students’ data entered in Grade Speed by the teacher will be 85% or better.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Students in grades 3-12 of the identified non-restricted students (under the health classification for physical education) will be assessed using Fitnessgram.
PE Department (Ms. Friede, Ms. Washington, Mr. Medrano, Mr. Katz)
Fitnessgram program 100% of all students’ data will be entered in Fitnessgram according to teacher and campus.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Identify students in the 85th to 99th plus percentile to receive health and wellness information and case management for obesity. Parents will be informed of results through mail and will be given information of programs that address obesity issues.
PE Department (Ms. Friede, Ms. Washington, Mr. Medrano, Mr. Katz) School Nurse
Letters Monitor students health through spot checks.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Annually Principals will provide campus staff, teachers, and parents the campuses Fitnessgram report/results.
Principal (Ron Gonzales) Spot checks to see if data was received.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
All middle school students will be enrolled and participate in four semesters overall of physical education.
Counselor (Thomas Edwards) Registrar (Jennifer Martinez
Master schedule Spot checks of student schedules.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
In partnership with Go Austin, Vamos Austin staff will develop a Campus Wellness Team, which will include parents, staff and students, to create monthly wellness themes, fitness awareness and encouragement of healthy foods/drink.
Coach Washington, Coach Friede, Family Resource Center Staff
Flyers Announcements Calendar New water fountains
Sign in sheets Lower obesity rates as noted on logs
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Campuses will comply with nutrition policy (CO, Legal) and wellness policy (FAA, Local).
Principal (Ron Gonzales) Administrators
No compliance issues reported from Texas Department of Agriculture, campus staff, parents, or from food services.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Table #DR-2 Objective: Effective violence prevention and intervention measures will be in place.
Page 14 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2 Specific Improvement Strategy Responsible
Person(s) Needed Resources
(Include PD Support) Evidence of Implementation/
Effectiveness Timeframe for
Completion Status
Become a No Place for Hate Campus Ms. Friede, Ms. Podber, Counselors
No Place for Hate guidelines Completion of initial 3 designation activities
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Character education will be taught in all classrooms focusing, but not limited to, bullying, cyber bulling, namecalling, respect.
Counselors, Ms. Clark, Mr. Edwards, Ms.Sciore, Teachers
Lesson plans developed by counselors
Reduction in referrals to office August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Campus administrators and teachers attend Social Emotional Learning and Capturing Kids Heart PD that develops personal awareness of their own culture, values, beliefs, and the impact on the classroom environment and ensure their implementation throughout the day.
Ron Gonzales Refresh PD for those previously trained PD for those new to the campus
Documented classroom walkthroughs and observations. Discipline referral data. Student progress monitoring.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Strategic teacher duty placement for the morning entering and afternoon dismissal
Supervising administrator Mr. SmithTeachers
Duty schedule Reduction of negative incidents August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Table #DR-3 Objective: Parental involvement will be encouraged. Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Principal will invite parents to participate in “Coffee Talks” in order to promote school spirit, activities and entertain community input on outside concerns.
Family Resource Center Parent Support Specialist, Jessica Sosa Prinicpal, Ron Gonzales
Agendas Calendar
Sign in sheet After meeting survey
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Parents are invited to the monthly PTA and CAC meetings in order to promote school governance.
PTA President, Ms. Moreno, Parent Support Specialist, Jessica Sosa, Principal Ron Gonzales
Agendas Calendars
Sign in Sheet After meeting survey
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Support the Family Resource Center in its parent activities, like Parent Academies, Adult Computer Classes.
Family Resource Center, Ms. Vargas, Principal Ron Gonzales
Agendas Calendars
Agenda Sign in sheet After meeting survey
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Support the Boys & Girls Club and ACE programs activities like, ZUMBA classes for parents and community, ESL classes and “Lights on After School” awareness program
Boys & Girls club, ACE program, Parent Specialist Jessica Sosa
Flyers Announcements
Sign in sheet
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Students will be recognized at the end of every six weeks for outstanding grades at the End of Six Weeks Awards Assemblies.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Teachers
Certificates Ribbons Teleparent communication
Report cards
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Students will utilize agendas to encourage organization, responsibility and parent involvement in the students everyday schoolwork.
Principal, (Ron Gonzales) Grade Level Administrators( Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith) Teachers
Agenda pages Completed agenda Signed agenda pages
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Page 15 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-3 Objective: Parental involvement will be encouraged. Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
The campus will implement an attendance plan that addresses prevention (weekly positive announcements), intervention (School Messenger calls parents, drop out intervention hosts attendance recovery during lunch), and incentive strategies (student store, perfect attendance assemblies).
Drop out Preventions Specialist(Vanessa Espinoza) Parent Support Specialist(Jessica Sosa) Attendance Specialist (Stephanie Rodriguez) Supervising Administrator (Monica Martinez)
Agenda, notebooks Court agendas Absentee lists Phone Logs
Monthly agenda’s Truancy court documentation eCST documentation Phone logs
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Students and parents will participate in the “Get Schooled Attendance Challenge” via the internet, where students attendance rates will increase and incentives will be awarded.
Dropout Specialist, Vanessa Espinoza, Parent Support Specialist Jessica Sosa
Get Schooled Resources Computers
Daily attendance roster Get Schooled Reports
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Continue to share the importance of coming to school.
Principal, (Ron Gonzales) Grade Level Administrators( Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith) Teachers Attendance Specialist (Stephanie Rodriguez) Dropout Prevention Specialist (Vanessa Espinosa) Teachers
Announcements Daily posting of attendance percentages by grade level. Parent classes hosted by Drop Out Specialist and Parent Support Specialist. eCST documentation. Team Meeting Notes
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Faculty and staff will implement a school-wide discipline plan that addresses students' social and emotional needs via the implementation of Capturing Kids Hearts, Positive Behavior Support Systems and the Social Emotional Learning curriculum.
SEL Lead Teachers (Michelle Freide, Racheal Podber) Administrators (Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith) Faculty & Staff
Discipline referral rates will decrease by 10% CKH Process champions classroom visit documentation Team Meeting Notes
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Table #DR-4 Objective: Adequate and appropriate campus-level professional development will be provided. Note: This action plan component must be approved by the CAC. Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Page 16 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-4 Objective: Adequate and appropriate campus-level professional development will be provided. Note: This action plan component must be approved by the CAC. Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Data collection at the end of every six weeks will determine professional development and teacher support needed to help increase teacher knowledge and skills.
Principal (Ron Gonzales) Teacher surveys Follow up surveys after Professional Development
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Ensure teachers are attending professional development trainings that support linguistic and content advancement of ELLs i.e., ELPS at a Glance, Strategies for ELLs, Reading in the Content, ELPS Academy
ESL Department (Ms. Salas, Ms. Campos, Mr. Monfries, Mr. VerHalen, Ms. Gonzales) Supervising Administrator (Rebecca Ramirez)
Available PD’s Follow up surveys PD sign up sheets
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Conduct collaborative planning sessions via PLC’s that ensure pace/scope of curriculum and PD offerings are consistent with student needs.
Principal, (Ron Gonzales) Grade Level Administrators( Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith) Teachers
Lesson Plans PLC agendas
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Faculty and staff will implement a school-wide discipline plan that addresses students' social and emotional needs via the implementation of Capturing Kids Hearts, Positive Behavior Support Systems and the Social Emotional Learning curriculum .
SEL Lead Teachers (Michelle Freide, Racheal Podber) Principal, Mr Gonzales Administrators (Ms. Sneed, Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith) Faculty & Staff
Staff development Sign in sheets eCST notes
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Novice to 3rd year teachers will meet with mentor teachers on a monthly basis to discuss topics that have been identified as important by the group at the beginning of the year.
J. Campos, M. Martinez Mentor teacher district training, Lead Mentor Teacher training
Sign in sheets, mentor surveys, discussion notes
August 2013- June 2013
Ongoing
Novice to 3rd year teachers will meet with mentor teachers to discuss topics specific to their grade level and or content including but not limited to content, classroom management, CRMs, lesson planning.
JCampos, Mentor teachers, Mentee teachers
Mentor teacher district training, Teach Like a Champion, Power Struggles
Sign in sheets, mentor notes, electronic log in
August 2013- June 2013
Ongoing
Page 17 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
REQUIRED FOR CAMPUSES THAT MEET CERTAIN CONDITIONS (Conditions in Yellow) Special Education Identification – All Levels Table #DR-5 Objective: Reduce special education identification rate. Condition: If rate > 8.5% Source: SPED C-IEP (A) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Review SPED folder, assessment data and documentation, schedule staffing for targeted students and review everything with Evaluation Specialist to determine if further evaluation is needed to meet criteria for dismissal.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
SpEd folders Staffing minutes, teacher input reports, assessment data, SEEDS Communication Log, eCST Service Tracking and ARD paperwork.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Document all contacts, be it with guardians, parents, therapeutic service staff in eCST; hold monthly Grade Level eCST meetings to identify students in need.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
SpEd log eCST notes
eCST meeting minutes, eCST system documentation, documented interventions, referrals to therapeutic services, and progress monitoring logs.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Table #DR-6 Objective: Reduce the rate of African American students identified for special education. Condition: If rate > 1 percentage point above African American enrollment rate Source: SPED C-IEP (B) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Review campus level data on SPED representation provided by SPED department in order to schedule staffing for targeted students and review all information with Evaluation Specialists to determine if further evaluation is needed to meet criteria for dismissal.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair.
SpEd information Staffing minutes, teacher input reports, assessment data, SEEDS Communication Log, eCST Service Tracking and ARD paperwork.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Continue to train and implement strategic Tier II interventions, including effective progress monitoring tools using research based AISD model, including Power of 2 Inclusion Model.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
Power of 2 updates Classroom walkthroughs assessment data Progress monitoring
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Campus administrators and teachers attend PD that develops personal awareness of their own culture, values, beliefs, and the impact on the classroom environment, like Social Emotional Learning, Capturing Kids Hearts and Culturally Proficient Instruction.
Ron Gonzales Update on SEL tenents Update of CKH Book: Culturally Proficient Instruction
Documented classroom walkthroughs and observations. Discipline referral data.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Table #DR-7
Page 18 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Objective: Reduce the rate of Hispanic students identified for special education. Condition: If rate > 1 percentage point above Hispanic enrollment rate Source: SPED C-IEP (C) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Special Education Disciplinary Placements– All Levels Table #DR-8 Objective: Reduce the rate of special education students in discretionary DAEP settings. Condition: If rate > 1 percentage point above rate for all students Source: SPED C-IEP (E) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective ( No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Table #DR-9 Objective: Reduce the rate of special education students in discretionary ISS settings. Condition: If rate > 10 percentage points above rate for all students Source: SPED C-IEP (F) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Table #DR-10 Objective: Reduce the rate of special education students in discretionary OSS settings. Condition: If rate > 6 percentage points above rate for all students Source: SPED C-IEP (G) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Continue to train and implement strategic Tier II interventions, including effective progress monitoring tools using research based AISD models like Power of 2, SEL tenents and CKH principles.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
Refresh PD for those previously trained PD for those new to the campus
Documented classroom walkthroughs and observations. Discipline referral data. Student progress monitoring.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Campus administrators and teachers attend PD that develops personal awareness of their own culture, values, beliefs, and the impact on the classroom environment, like Social Emotional Learning, Capturing Kids Hearts and Culturally Proficient Instruction.
Ron Gonzales Update on SEL tenents Update of CKH Book: Culturally Proficient Instruction
Documented classroom walkthroughs and observations. Discipline referral data.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Provide PD for general and special Ron Gonzales Refresh PD for those Documented classroom August 2013 – June Ongoing
Page 19 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-10 Objective: Reduce the rate of special education students in discretionary OSS settings. Condition: If rate > 6 percentage points above rate for all students Source: SPED C-IEP (G) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
education staff in the following areas to promote integration of executive functioning and social skills into instruction: Conflict management Reflection journals Self regulation (setting reasonable goals, reflect on prior experience, derive a plan, initiate behavior, inhibit behavior that interferes, monitor and evaluate behavior outcomes) How to maintain academic rigor while reducing behaviors
previously trained PD for those new to the campus
walkthroughs and observations. Discipline referral data. Student progress monitoring.
2013
Implement the campus Learning Support Center to support students who would otherwise be removed for discretionary reasons.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
Behavior Intervention Plan, Functional Behavioral Assessment if needed ARD if necessary
ARD documentation and discipline data
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Special Education Service in LRE – All Levels Table #DR-11 Objective: Increase the rate of special education students served in the general education population setting 80% of the day or more. Condition: If rate < 66% Source: SPED C-IEP (H) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Special Education STAAR Participation in Regular and Modified Exams – ES and MS Table #DR-12 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Increase the percentage of special education students who take the regular STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate < 50% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
In order to improve teacher quality and deepen the role of the learner teachers will differentiate instruction, check for
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair Grade Level
Book: Teach Like a Champion
Lesson plans PLC meeting agenda, minutes.
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Page 20 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-12 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Increase the percentage of special education students who take the regular STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate < 50% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
understanding and monitor student progress through PLC professional development which will focus on the following instructional strategies: 1. Teach Like A Champion Essential Techniques (increase time on task) 2. Framework and Kagan Cooperative Learning Structures (increase student engagement) 3. AVID WICR/Cornell notes (increase student engagement and higher level thinking 4. Literacy strategies including reading and writing across the curriculum. 5. The Simple Sentence; Building Grammar – 7th grade (Grammar resource)
Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Williams, Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
KAGAN framework
Posted anchors of support Interactive notebook entries Assessment data
Teachers will identify those struggling students and provide proper interventions. They will utilize class time to pull small groups to focus on specific linguistic skills as needed and SpEd identified students will also attend academic camps which will utilize differentiation techniques.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
accommodations from IEP
Tutorial lesson plans Documented strategies on plansStudent assessment Walkthrough logs
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers will utilize school-wide Math strategies and problem solving guide to empower students. Students will learn how to utilize the problem solving board when solving word problems. Problem solving boards will be posted in every classroom.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Problem Solving Boards Completed Problem solving boards posted Notes in the Interactive Notebook Cornell Notes
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Create opportunities for students to participate in campus wide interventions for math via campus tiered intervention lessons, using teacher created pacing calendars, based on misconceptions and gaps.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Intervention logs Copies
Teacher Intervention logs denoting when a child received intervention or tutoring. Intervention pacing calendars. Maverick Trails . Quintiled documents
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Page 21 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-12 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Increase the percentage of special education students who take the regular STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate < 50% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Students will participate in numerical fluency practice in order to become better versed at simple number operations/sets.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Numerical fluency activity sheets
Graded sheets Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Students will be provided the CSI, spiraled warmups to ensure that they are covering all TEKs objectives through daily practice.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
CSI notebooks from AISD Proper completion of CSI warmup notebook Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
All students will participate in the 800 Word challenge to increase vocabulary automaticity.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia and Ms. Walker, Teachers
800 Word Challenge materials PD by Rosa Waters
Student activity books Student assessments Student completion of the challenge
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Teachers will implement strategies from Keys to Literacy to engage student s in a variety of text types.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Professional development Lesson plan documentation of strategies Walkthrough forms noting strategies
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Teachers will implement strategies from Any Given Child to engage student s in their learning via drama based instruction
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Lead
Professional development Lesson plan documentation of strategies Walkthrough forms noting strategies
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Page 22 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-12 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Increase the percentage of special education students who take the regular STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate < 50% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Teachers Ms. Griego, Ms. Guajardo, Teachers
To better address the needs of students the Kilgo model will be used to deconstruct student expectations by identifying the academic verb, vocabulary, content and context in order to address academic rigor.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
KILGO training “Deconstructing student expectations”
Walkthrough data Lesson plans
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Campus administrator annually reports length of instructional day to SPED Coordinator – Data and Compliance to determine steps needed to assure students are prepared to take STAAR.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
SPED folder, assessment data and documentation
Progress monitoring, assessment data, documentation of interventions, STAA R results.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Campus counselors and SPED department chairs use forms developed in SY 10-11 verifying that student schedules are based on the IEP schedules of services.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
SPED folder, assessment data and documentation.
Progress monitoring, assessment data, documentation of interventions, and ARDS as scheduled and needed.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
SPED case managers will distribute and gain acknowledgement of receipt of relevant portions of the IEPs electronically to instructional and support providers by the first day of semester, or within one day after the finalization of annual ARD meeting or other ARD meetings where changes were made.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
IEPs Acknowledgement receipt
Signed acknowledgement of receipt and explanation of IEPs and accommodations by all relevant staff members.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Detailed explanations of information will be provided to each instructional and support provider via PD from the case manager that will review those relevant portions of the IEP of new SPED students.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
IEPs Sign in sheets
Staff development agendas, minutes and sign in sheets.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Campus administrator responds to survey identifying the documentation system specific to that campus to ensure IEP distribution.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
Paper copies distributed to all relevant staff members and signed acknowledgement received.
Paper copies distributed to all relevant staff members and signed acknowledgement received.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
For SPED students living in Residential Facilities (to include shelters,
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and
SpEd folders ARD results August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Page 23 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-12 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Increase the percentage of special education students who take the regular STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate < 50% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
therapeutic foster homes, group homes, etc): Campus administrators and SPED case managers review rules/regulation regarding commensurate school day making individualized student-based decision concerning length
Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
After attending AISD SPED Department Chair training, SPED department provides to campus SPED teachers an annual review of the procedures for determining the need for assigning surrogate parents for SPED students living in Residential Facilities (to include shelters, therapeutic foster homes, group homes, etc). These students would be referred to as RF students.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
SPED dept chair mtg SPED folder
Progress monitoring, documentation and ARD documentation.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Table #DR-13 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Decrease the percentage of special education students who take the modified STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate > 20% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Campus administrator annually reports length of instructional day to SPED Coordinator – Data and Compliance to determine steps needed to assure students are prepared to take STAAR.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
SPED folder, assessment data and documentation
Progress monitoring, assessment data, documentation of interventions, STAAR results.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Campus counselors and SPED department chairs use forms developed in SY 10-11 verifying that student schedules are based on the IEP schedules of services.
Rebecca Ramirez, SPED Administrator and Johanna Castillo SPED Chair
SPED folder, assessment data and documentation.
Progress monitoring, assessment data, documentation of interventions, and ARDS as scheduled and needed.
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Teachers will identify those struggling students and provide proper interventions. They will utilize class time to pull small groups to focus on specific linguistic skills as needed and SpEd identified students will also attend academic camps which will utilize differentiation techniques.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr.Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms.
accommodations from IEP
Tutorial lesson plans Documented strategies on plansStudent assessment Walkthrough logs
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Page 24 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-13 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Decrease the percentage of special education students who take the modified STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate > 20% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Teachers will utilize school-wide Math strategies and problem solving guide to empower students. Students will learn how to utilize the problem solving board when solving word problems. Problem solving boards will be posted in every classroom.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Problem Solving Boards Completed Problem solving boards posted Notes in the Interactive Notebook Cornell Notes
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Create opportunities for students to participate in campus wide interventions for math via campus tiered intervention lessons, using teacher created pacing calendars, based on misconceptions and gaps.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Intervention logs Copies
Teacher Intervention logs denoting when a child received intervention or tutoring. Intervention pacing calendars. Maverick Trails . Quintiled documents
June 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Students will participate in numerical fluency practice in order to become better versed at simple number operations/sets.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
Numerical fluency activity sheets
Graded sheets Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Students will be provided the CSI, spiraled warmups to ensure that they are covering all TEKs objectives through daily practice.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coach Ms. Williams, Teachers
CSI notebooks from AISD Proper completion of CSI warmup notebook Assessments
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Teachers will implement strategies from Keys to Literacy to engage student s in a variety of text types.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith,
Professional development Lesson plan documentation of strategies Walkthrough forms noting strategies
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
Page 25 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-13 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Decrease the percentage of special education students who take the modified STAAR test in all subjects (STAAR 3-8). Condition: If rate > 20% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (Yes): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
Teachers will implement strategies from Any Given Child to engage student s in their learning via drama based instruction
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Lead Teachers Ms. Griego, Ms. Guajardo, Teachers
Professional development Lesson plan documentation of strategies Walkthrough forms noting strategies
August 2013 – June 2013
Ongoing
To better address the needs of students the Kilgo model will be used to deconstruct student expectations by identifying the academic verb, vocabulary, content and context in order to address academic rigor.
Principal, Ron Gonzales, Johanna Castillo SPED Chair, Grade Level Administrators Ms. Ramirez, Ms. Martinez, Mr. Smith, Instructional Coaches Ms. Garcia, Ms. Williams and Ms. Walker, Teachers
KILGO training “Deconstructing student expectations”
Walkthrough data Lesson plans
August 2013 – June 2014
Ongoing
Special Education Measureable Postsecondary Goals - HS Table #DR-14 Objective: Increase the percentage of ARDs with measurable postsecondary transition goals. Condition: If ARD rate < 100% Source: SPED C-IEP (N) Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Page 26 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
ELL Proficiency Levels – All Levels Table #DR-15 Objective: Decrease the rate of ELLs who remain at beginning proficiency level on TELPAS Reading over a two-year period (grades 2-12). Condition: If percentage of LEP student at beginning proficiency level over two-year period > 5% Source: AISD CDA Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Dropout Rates – MS and HS Levels Only Table #DR-16 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Reduce the special education annual dropout rate. Condition: If SPED annual dropout rate > 2% (MS-grades 7-8; HS-grades 9-12) Source: AISD Acct/PEIMS Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Table #DR-17 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Reduce the ELL annual dropout rate. Condition: If LEP annual dropout rate > 2% (MS-grades 7-8; HS-grades 9-12) Source: AISD Acct/PEIMS Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
4-Year Graduation Rates – HS Level Only Table #DR-18 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Increase the rate of special education students who graduate within four years. Condition: If special education student rate < 75% Source: AISD Acct/PEIMS Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Page 27 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Table #DR-19 State: Below safeguard target AYP: Area of low performance Objective: Increase the rate of ELLs who graduate within four years. Condition: If LEP student rate < 75% Source: AISD Acct/PEIMS Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Graduation Plans – HS Level Only Table #DR-20 Objective: Increase the rate of special education students who graduate on RHSP or DAP high school plans. Condition: If special education student rate < 20% Source: AISD Acct/PEIMS Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective (No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Table #DR-21 Objective: Increase the rate of ELLs who graduate on RHSP or DAP high school plans. Condition: If LEP student rate < 70% Source: AISD Acct/PEIMS Report Does Campus Performance Require Inclusion of This Objective ( No): Applicable Strategic Plan Goal(s): 1,2,3,4
Specific Improvement Strategy ResponsiblePerson(s)
Needed Resources(Include PD Support)
Evidence of Implementation/Effectiveness
Timeframe for Completion
Status
Page 28 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX A Use of State Compensatory Education Funds for Improved Student Achievement
Programs and services currently being implemented on this campus that are partially or fully supported through State Compensatory Education (SCE) or grant funding include the following:
Programs/Services Use
After-School Tutorials Extra duty pay for tutorials for students at risk of not meeting state level academic performance standards in core content areas on STAAR
General Supplies for at-risk students Supplies for classroom instruction and academic interventions for students identified as at risk of not meeting academic achievement goals on STAAR.
Middle School reading initiatives Reading programs and/or initiatives serving students performing below grade level and not meeting STAAR academic achievement goals in reading.
After-school detention Extra duty pay for teachers convening after school detention. During detention, additional social, emotional, behavioral, and academic interventions are provided to at risk youth to promote effective learning and maximize academic achievement.
Reading specialists Reading Specialist salary and benefits: serving students performing below grade level and not meeting STAAR academic achievement goals in reading.
Catapult High Dosage Tutoring Accelerate 6th grade Math Instruction. HDT provided to students at risk of not meeting state performance standards on Math STAAR.
Dropout prevention services Reduce drop-out rates through conferences, visits, parent mtgs. Services provided to youth at risk of dropping out: truancy, poor attendance, not working on grade level.
Extra-duty pay After school tutoring, curriculum writing, Saturday camps. These are services provided to students who are at risk of not meeting achievement standards on STAAR.
Parent Support Specialist The PSS collaborates with the administrator and counselors to provide at risk students and their families additional social, emotional, behavioral, and academic interventions to create effective learning environments and maximize student academic achievement.
TOTAL $853,657.00 The figures above include the salaries (in part or whole) of the equivalent of [number] full-time staff members (FTEs), added to the faculty in order to support the supplemental programs and services funded through State Compensatory Education.
Page 29 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX B Highly Qualified Teacher Recruitment and Retention Plan
Area 1: Increase percentage of highly qualified (HQ) teachers to meet and/or maintain 100%. Strategies (check all that apply, but check at least one):
Work with staffing coordinator, identify staff not meeting HQ standards Notify staff of deficit area(s) Agree with staff on appropriate ways to meet the standard Provide adequate time for staff to attend trainings and/or take needed exams Other:
Area 2: Ensure low-income students and minority students are not taught at higher rates than other student groups by teachers who are not HQ. Strategies
(check all that apply, but check at least one):
Offer early-bird signing bonuses to teachers at Title I campuses Provide bilingual and special education stipends Collaborate with HR to identify staffing needs so that qualified candidates are available Other:
Area 3: Attract and retain HQ teachers. Strategies (check all that apply, but check at least one):
Participate in district-sponsored job fairs Participate in recruiting trips Provide mentors to first and second year teachers Offer high-quality professional development Provide leadership opportunities for teachers Encourage participation in National Board program Meet on a regular basis with new teachers to review needs/issues Other:
Area 4: Assist teachers not currently HQ to meet the HQ requirements in a timely manner. Strategies (check all that apply, but check at least one):
Assign teachers to areas in which already meet HQ Provide high-quality professional development in area(s) needed Pay for study courses for required exams Pay for passed exams Provide substitutes or stipends for professional development Other:
Page 30 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX C Components for Title I Schools
(All Title I Schools) For all Title I schools, indicate the pages of the plan where the following components can be found:
Components Pages
Comprehensive needs assessment 6
School wide reform strategies that provide opportunities for all students to meet state standards and advanced levels of achievement, and that use effective methods/strategies based on scientifically based research 6-13, 17-25
Instruction by highly qualified staff 6-13, 17-25, 29
High quality/ongoing professional development for teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals to enable all students to meet state standards 16
Strategies to attract highly qualified teachers to high-need schools 29
Strategies to increase parental involvement 14-15
For Elementary: Transition to K assistance to Pre-K/EC students n/a
Inclusion of teachers in decisions regarding use of academic assessments (activities such as benchmark or other testing, use of data, etc.) 6-7, 9-10
Effective, timely additional assistance (e.g., interventions, tutorials, summer programs, etc.) to ensure struggling students meet state standards 7,9,11,12
Coordination and integration of federal, state, and local services and programs 6-13,15,17-25
Description of how campus will provide individual student academic assessment results to parents in a language they understand, including an interpretation of the results 14-15
Page 31 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX D Components for Title I Schools
(For Title I Schools in Stages 1-5 Needs Improvement)
* In February 2013, The Texas Education Agency (TEA) submitted a request to the United States Department of Education (USDE) to waive specific provisions of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2001. The waiver was intended to provide all 1,200 Texas public school districts greater flexibility in budgeting and in providing high quality education services to students. The waiver request was granted conditionally by Arne Duncan, U.S. Secretary of Education on September 30, 2013. Because the waiver was granted, districts were not required to comply with many of the AYP School Improvement requirements in the 2013-2014 school year.
For Title I schools in Stages 1-5 Needs Improvement, indicate the sections and pages of the plan where the following components can be found:
Components Pages CIP must be for two years N/A Strategies are based on scientifically based research that will strengthen the core academic subjects at the campus N/A
Plan addresses the specific academic issues that caused the campus to not meet AYP N/A Plan reflects policies and practices concerning the school’s core academic subjects that have the greatest likelihood of ensuring all groups will meet the state’s proficient level of achievement by 2013-2014 (included in SIP addendum)
N/A
Details of how the campus will spend not less than 10% of Title I, Part A campus allocation for providing teachers and the principal high-qualify professional development that: directly addresses the academic achievement problem that caused the campus to not meet AYP; meets the requirements for of high-quality professional development under Section 1119; and is provided in a manner that affords increased opportunity for participating in that professional development
6-13, 17-25, 29
Establishes specific annual, measurable objectives for continuous and substantial progress by each NCLB group of students to meet state’s standards by 2013-2014 N/A
Describes how the school will provide written notice about Needs Improvement status to parents in a format, and to the extent practicable, in a language that parents understand (included in SIP addendum) N/A
Specifies the responsibilities of the school and district, including the technical assistance that the district provides under Section 1120A (included in SIP addendum) N/A
Includes strategies to promote effective parental involvement in the school N/A Incorporates, as appropriate, activities before school, after school, during the summer, and during any extension of the school year N/A
Incorporates a teacher mentoring program N/A
Page 32 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX E Explanation of Title I, Part A Expenditures for Improving Student Performance
(All Title I Schools)
For all Title I schools, this table provides an executive summary of Title I, Part A expenditures, and ties them directly to improving student performance, as identified in the Needs Assessments and corresponding Improvement Strategies of the Action Plan. As appropriate to ensure clarity, please provide a brief description for line items (e.g., rather than simply listing “Field Trip,” list “Field Trip to Art Museum”). Please insert additional rows in the table as needed.
Type of Expenditure How Will Expenditure Improve Student Performance? Amount of
Expenditure How Will Impact Be
Assessed? Improvement Strategy Needs Assessment
Personnel
1 Teacher @33% and 1 ESL teacher @50%
Provide assistance for ELL students and help to meet district,state, and
federal standards
Improve student scores in all accountability groups $24,189
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
1 Parent Support Specialist @ 50% Increase parental support and support academic, attendance, and behavioral
goals.
Improve student scores in all accountability groups $15,132
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
2 FTE for Instructional Coaches Support teaching and learning in every content area
Improve student scores in all accountability groups $124,569
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
3 FTE Assistant Principal @33% Support teaching and learning. Improve student scores in all accountability groups $166,784
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Instructional Supplies, Materials, and Equipment
Extra Duty Support teaching and learning in every content area Targeted tutorials will be provided $64,528
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
General Supplies Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $97,135
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Copier Rental Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $7,000
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Page 33 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
Professional Development/Staff Training
Travel and registration Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $18,855
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Consultant/Facility Fee (Contracted Services
Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $10,000
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Community Services (Function 61) Reproduction /Printing Informative material to be distributed Support campus goals $1,581
Read Materials Materials for the Family Resource Center Support campus goals $1,337
General Supplies Support for the Family Resource Center Support campus goals $4,000
Travel and Registration Attendance at Parent Support Training/Conferences Support campus goals $0
Refreshments Snacks for parents and community members at meetings Support campus goals $2,000
Other Requests Salary cushion Support campus goals $15846
$ $552,956.00
TOTAL (Must Match BTO Total) $ $552,956.00
Page 34 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX F Explanation of Title I, Part A Expenditures for Improving Student Performance
(Stages 1-5 Needs Improvement)
* In February 2013, The Texas Education Agency (TEA) submitted a request to the United States Department of Education (USDE) to waive specific provisions of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2001. The waiver was intended to provide all 1,200 Texas public school districts greater flexibility in budgeting and in providing high quality education services to students. The waiver request was granted conditionally by Arne Duncan, U.S. Secretary of Education on September 30, 2013. Because the waiver was granted, districts were not required to comply with many of the AYP School Improvement requirements in the 2013-2014 school year.
For Title I schools in Stages 1-5 Needs Improvement, this table provides an executive summary of Title I, Part A expenditures, and ties them directly to improving student performance, as identified in the Needs Assessments and corresponding Improvement Strategies of the Action Plan. As appropriate to ensure clarity, please provide a brief description for line items (e.g., rather than simply listing “Field Trip,” list “Field Trip to Art Museum”). Please insert additional rows in the table as needed.
Type of Expenditure How Will Expenditure Improve Student Performance? Amount of
Expenditure How Will Impact Be
Assessed? Improvement Strategy Needs Assessment
Personnel
1 Teacher @33% and 1 ESL teacher @50%
Provide assistance for ELL students and help to meet district,state, and
federal standards
Improve student scores in all accountability groups $24,189
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
1 Parent Support Specialist @ 50% Increase parental support and support academic, attendance, and behavioral
goals.
Improve student scores in all accountability groups $15,132
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
2 FTE for Instructional Coaches Support teaching and learning in every content area
Improve student scores in all accountability groups $124,569
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
3 FTE Assistant Principal @33% Support teaching and learning. Improve student scores in all accountability groups $166,784
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Instructional Supplies, Materials, and Equipment
Extra Duty Support teaching and learning in every content area Targeted tutorials will be provided $64,528
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
General Supplies Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $97,135
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
Page 35 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
determined by state/federal standards
Copier Rental Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $7,000
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Professional Development/Staff Training
Travel and registration Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $18,855
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Consultant/Facility Fee (Contracted Services
Support teaching and learning in every content area Support campus goals $10,000
70% of all students will score at least 70% on district assessments or meet required improvement as
determined by state/federal standards
Community Services (Function 61) Reproduction /Printing Informative material to be distributed Support campus goals $1,581
Read Materials Materials for the Family Resource Center Support campus goals $1,337
General Supplies Support for the Family Resource Center Support campus goals $4,000
Travel and Registration Attendance at Parent Support Training/Conferences Support campus goals $0
Refreshments Snacks for parents and community members at meetings Support campus goals $2,000
Other Requests Salary cushion Support campus goals $15846
$ $552,956.00
TOTAL (Must Match BTO Total) $ $552,956.00
Page 36 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX G Additional NCLB Requirements
Parent Notice By the date required by the Texas Education Agency, all parents will be informed of individual student academic assessment results and AYP status via letters sent home in both English and Spanish. Assistance to families seeking choice and/or SES options will be provided. Student assessment results will be shared with parents in both English and Spanish whenever possible. Support This Campus Improvement Plan was developed collaboratively with Campus Advisory Council members and central office support. The district is committed to providing the campus support in school improvement efforts. Support includes but is not limited to: Guidance, Leadership, and Monitoring Associate Superintendent Compliance and Fiscal Monitoring as per Section 1120A Departments of State and Federal Accountability and Finance Data Analysis Campus and District Accountability Curriculum and Benchmark Data, Professional Development Department of Curriculum Professional Development and Support in Determining Student Needs Department of Special Education and Bilingual Education Dropout Recovery School Community Liaisons Parental Involvement Planning and Training Opportunities Family Resource Center TEA, through the School Improvement Resource Center, provides technical assistance in the areas of needs assessment, scientifically based research, and best practices. The technical assistance provider (TAP), approved by SIRC, will support the principal in improvement efforts. As evidenced throughout this plan, the campus, in working with central office support, is implementing policies and practices that have the greatest likelihood of ensuring that all groups of students will meet proficiency levels of achievement as set by the state by no later than 2013-2014. Programs and practices are based on current scientifically based research. Enhancing rigor and relevance in [specify subject(s) missed in AYP] especially for [specify the student group(s) that missed the standards] is critical since performance was not within NCLB standards. Also, the participation rates and/or attendance rate, or graduation rate was/were below standard so it will be essential to focus on this/these area/areas as well. Evaluation and Outcomes The ultimate goal for this plan is to significantly improve student achievement for all students, including those served in special programs. The principal, CAC, and campus staff will monitor action plans and strategies on a regular basis to determine the level of implementation and the effectiveness in bringing about desired student outcomes. These outcomes target closing any disparity in achievement levels among student groups. Strategies, if successful, will create a positive learning environment in which all students are actively engaged in a challenging meaningful curriculum, based on TEKS and Principles of Learning. Specific evaluation measures and performance targets are included in the Long-Range Matrix for Student Achievement and in the Action Plan.
Page 37 of 37 Campus and District Accountability 05/6/2013
APPENDIX H Pregnancy Related Services
Pregnancy Related Services (PRS) are a combination of Support Services and Compensatory Education Home Instruction (CEHI). These services are available to a pregnant student during pregnancy prenatal and postpartum periods to help her adjust academically, mentally and physically and to remain in school. Support Services are provided during the prenatal period of pregnancy and while the student is still attending school, as well as during the prenatal or postpartum period while the student is at home or hospital for a valid medical necessity or recovering from delivery and being served with PRS CEHI. Examples of Support Services the student may access are counseling, health services provided by school nurse, case management and service coordination. Compensatory Education Home Instruction (CEHI) is academic instruction offered to the student in the home or hospital. The number of hours per week of instruction by a certified teacher varies according to student needs and attendance is reported according to TEA formula. This service is provided under different circumstances: 1) Prenatal Confinement. If the student cannot attend school on campus due to a valid medical necessity documented by a nurse practitioner or
licensed physician licensed to practice in the United States. A medical release must be obtained by the medical or nurse practitioner to return to campus for any reason, including to take standardized tests. There is no limit to the number of events or the length of each event.
2) Postpartum Confinement. A student who has delivered a live, aborted, or stillborn baby, suffered a miscarriage or death of a newborn, or placed a baby up for adoption can be served, beginning the day of or the day after delivery for up to six consecutive weeks at home or hospital.
3) Extended Postpartum Confinement. Four additional weeks of CEHI may be provided a student when a valid medical necessity of the mother or child exists as documented by a licensed physician licensed to practice in the United States.
4) Break-In-Service Confinement. This service is for a maximum of ten weeks in length, divided into two periods in instances when the infant
remains hospitalized after delivery. The student may return to school while the infant is hospitalized, then return to CEHI when the infant is home. When the student returns to school between the two CEHI periods, the student will not be coded PRS. A medical release will be required for the student to return to campus.
At the district level, compensatory education funds are used to fund teacher units for the Pregnancy Related Services program.
APPENDIX I Strategic Performance Measures and Improvement Targets
Campus Scorecard 2013-14
For ALL levels, the following performance indicators are included:
- STAAR/EOC (including retesters) - Attendance - Discipline - TELPAS - Student Fitness
For the ELEMENTARY SCHOOL level, the following performance indicators are included:
- Primary Reading Assessment
For the MIDDLE SCHOOL and HIGH SCHOOL level, the following performance indicators are included:
- Annual Dropout Rate (9-12) (with exclusions)
For the HIGH SCHOOL level, the following performance indicators are included:
- Recommended or Distinguished Program Participation - Graduation Rate (with exclusions) - SAT/ACT Participation and Performance - Advanced Placement/IB Exam Participation and Performance - Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment
Improvement goals and end goal targets for STAAR/EOC are pre-populated at district growth rates, but may be set at higher rates.Improvement goals and end goal targets for other indicators must be set by the campus. All improvement goals and end goal targetsmust be approved by the Associate Superintendent for the campus.
STAAR/EOC tables based on estimated accountability subset. Students in U.S. schools Year 1 through Year 3 are excluded.
STAAR/EOC Reading/ELA at Level II - Final
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
Safeguard n/a n/a n/a n/a
All Students 15 18 70.00 34
Asian n/a n/a 70.00 n/a
AA 21 20 70.00 36
Hispanic 14 17 70.00 34
White * 46 70.00 57
2 or More * * 70.00 *
EcD 14 18 70.00 34
ELL 5 6 70.00 25
Spec Ed 35 33 70.00 46
6th English 13 16 70.00 33
7th Grade 13 16 70.00 33
8th Grade 18 22 70.00 38
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes English I Reading, English II Reading, English I, and English II EOC tests
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 2 June 2013
STAAR/EOC Math at Level II - Final
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
Safeguard n/a n/a n/a n/a
All Students 13 14 70.00 31
Asian n/a n/a 70.00 n/a
AA 14 13 70.00 30
Hispanic 12 13 70.00 31
White 46 * 70.00 *
2 or More * * 70.00 *
EcD 13 14 70.00 31
ELL 7 9 70.00 27
Spec Ed 26 37 70.00 50
6th English 17 23 70.00 39
7th Grade 11 8 70.00 27
8th Grade 11 12 70.00 29
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes Algebra I EOC test
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 3 June 2013
STAAR/EOC Writing at Level II - Final
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
Safeguard n/a n/a n/a n/a
All Students 8 7 70.00 26
Asian n/a n/a 70.00 n/a
AA * * 70.00 *
Hispanic 8 6 70.00 25
White * * 70.00 *
2 or More <1 >99 100.00 >99
EcD 8 7 70.00 26
ELL * * 70.00 *
Spec Ed 38 38 70.00 51
7th Grade 8 7 70.00 26
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes English I Writing and English II Writing EOC tests
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 4 June 2013
STAAR/EOC Social Studies at Level II - Final
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
Safeguard n/a n/a n/a n/a
All Students 5 6 70.00 25
Asian n/a n/a 70.00 n/a
AA * <1 70.00 20
Hispanic 4 6 70.00 25
White <1 * 70.00 *
2 or More <1 <1 70.00 20
EcD 6 6 70.00 25
ELL * 8 70.00 26
Spec Ed 26 30 70.00 44
8th Grade 5 6 70.00 25
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle School
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 5 June 2013
STAAR/EOC Science at Level II - Final
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
Safeguard n/a n/a n/a n/a
All Students 10 19 70.00 35
Asian n/a n/a 70.00 n/a
AA * * 70.00 *
Hispanic 9 19 70.00 35
White <1 * 70.00 *
2 or More <1 <1 70.00 20
EcD 10 19 70.00 35
ELL * 9 70.00 27
Spec Ed 31 40 70.00 52
8th Grade 10 19 70.00 35
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes Biology EOC test
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 6 June 2013
STAAR/EOC Reading/ELA at Level III
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
All Students 2 4 25.00 14
Asian n/a n/a 25.00 n/a
AA * * 25.00 *
Hispanic 2 4 25.00 13
White <1 * 25.00 *
2 or More * * 30.00 *
EcD 2 4 25.00 14
ELL * * 25.00 *
Spec Ed * <1 25.00 10
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes English I Reading, English II Reading, English I, and English II EOC tests
STAAR/EOC Math at Level III
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
All Students 3 2 25.00 12
Asian n/a n/a 25.00 n/a
AA <1 * 25.00 *
Hispanic 3 2 25.00 12
White <1 <1 25.00 10
2 or More <1 <1 25.00 10
EcD 3 2 25.00 12
ELL * * 25.00 *
Spec Ed * * 25.00 *
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes Algebra I EOC test
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 7 June 2013
STAAR/EOC Writing at Level III
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
All Students * * 25.00 *
Asian n/a n/a 25.00 n/a
AA <1 * 25.00 *
Hispanic * * 25.00 *
White <1 <1 25.00 10
2 or More <1 <1 25.00 10
EcD * * 25.00 *
ELL <1 <1 25.00 10
Spec Ed <1 <1 25.00 10
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes English I Writing and English II Writing EOC tests
STAAR/EOC Social Studies at Level III
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
All Students * <1 25.00 10
Asian n/a n/a 25.00 n/a
AA <1 <1 25.00 10
Hispanic * <1 25.00 10
White <1 <1 25.00 10
2 or More <1 <1 25.00 10
EcD * <1 25.00 10
ELL <1 <1 25.00 10
Spec Ed * <1 25.00 10
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle School
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 8 June 2013
STAAR/EOC Science at Level III
2011-12
Est
2012-13
Est
2013-14
Improvement
Goal
2013-14
Target
All Students * 3 25.00 13
Asian n/a n/a 25.00 n/a
AA <1 <1 25.00 10
Hispanic * 3 25.00 13
White <1 * 40.00 *
2 or More <1 <1 25.00 10
EcD * 3 25.00 13
ELL <1 * 25.00 *
Spec Ed <1 * 25.00 *
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic FilesIncludes EOC taken in Middle SchoolIncludes Biology EOC test
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 9 June 2013
Estimated Attendance
Estimated Improvement Goal
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
All Students 93.2% 93.4% 93.2% 93.7% 93% 94% 95.00
African American 92.6% 92% 91.5% 93.4% 91% 92.6% 95.00
Asian 98.3% 86.4% 0.00
Hispanic 93.5% 93.6% 93.3% 93.7% 93.2% 94.1% 95.00
Native American 95% 91.1% 86.1% 94.9% 94.3% 94.7% 95.00
White 87.3% 90.2% 95.9% 92.3% 88.8% 92.5% 95.00
2 or More 95.7% 91% 93.7% 95.00
EcD 93.6% 93.4% 93.4% 93.4% 92.9% 94% 95.00
Data Source: AISD Student Information System
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 10 June 2013
All A-A Asian Hisp N-A White
25%
44%
23%
>99%
9%
0
20
40
60
80
100
All A-A Asian Hisp N-A White
HS 25% 44% - 23% >99% 9%
Campus Suspension to HomeStudent Discipline Aggregate CountsStudent Group Enrollment 2012-13
All Students 1005
African American 87
Asian
Hispanic 886
Native American 1
White 22
Counts as of discipline report date, June 2013.Includes both active and inactive students.
All A-A Asian Hisp N-A White
<1% <1%0
20
40
60
80
100
All A-A Asian Hisp N-A White
Removals <1% - - <1% - -
Campus Discretionary Removals
All A-A Asian Hisp N-A White
7% 13%
7%
>99%
0
20
40
60
80
100
All A-A Asian Hisp N-A White
ISS 7% 13% - 7% >99% -
Campus ALC/EDAP or ISS
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 11 June 2013
Discipline Targets
Campus Discretionary Removals
Estimated Improvement Goal
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
# Discretionary
Removals to
Alt. Ed. Program
% Ethnic
Group
Removed
# Discretionary
Removals to
Alt. Ed. Program
% Ethnic
Group
Removed
# Discretionary
Removals to
Alt. Ed. Program
% Ethnic
Group
Removed
% Ethnic
Group
Removed
All Students 14 1.46% 22 1.89% 3 .3% 0.25
African American 3 3.13% 0.25
Asian 0.00
Hispanic 14 1.61% 19 1.84% 3 .34% 0.25
Native American 0.00
White 0.00
The rate reflects the number of students in each ethnic group receiving the stated disciplinary action divided by the number of students in the ethnic group active and inactive when this report was run.Source: DEEDS Discipline Data for PEIMS. 2012-2013 data are draft. Final data reports will be disseminated in August 2013.
Campus Suspensions to Home
Estimated Improvement Goal
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
# Campus
Suspensions
to Home
% Campus
Suspensions
to Home
# Campus
Suspensions
to Home
% Campus
Suspensions
to Home
# Campus
Suspensions
to Home
% Campus
Suspensions
to Home
% Ethnic
Group
Removed
All Students 278 28.99% 364 31.24% 247 24.58% 20.00
African American 27 37.5% 41 42.71% 38 43.68% 5.00
Asian 0.00
Hispanic 246 28.37% 313 30.3% 206 23.25% 20.00
Native American 1 100% 1 100% 0.00
White 4 28.57% 5 20.83% 2 9.09% 1.50
The rate reflects the number of students in each ethnic group receiving the stated disciplinary action divided by the number of students in the ethnic group active and inactive when this report was run.Source: DEEDS Discipline Data for PEIMS. 2012-2013 data are draft. Final data reports will be disseminated in August 2013.
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 12 June 2013
Campus ALC/EDAP or In School Suspensions
Estimated Improvement Goal
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
# Campus
Suspensions
to ISS
% Campus
Suspensions
to ISS
# Campus
Suspensions
to ISS
% Campus
Suspensions
to ISS
# Campus
Suspensions
to ISS
% Campus
Suspensions
to ISS
% Ethnic
Group
Removed
All Students 96 10.01% 119 10.04% 75 7.46% 6.50
African American 12 16.67% 10 10.42% 11 12.64% 5.00
Asian 0.00
Hispanic 82 9.46% 103 9.97% 63 7.11% 6.00
Native American 1 100% 0.00
White 1 7.14% 1 4.17% 0.50
The rate reflects the number of students in each ethnic group receiving the stated disciplinary action divided by the number of students in the ethnic group active and inactive when this report was run.Source: DEEDS Discipline Data for PEIMS. 2012-2013 data are draft. Final data reports will be disseminated in August 2013.
Fall Enrollment (PEIMS Snapshot)
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
All Students 888 865 879 987 886
African American 83 81 56 80 65
Asian
Hispanic 784 774 765 858 776
Native American 2 1 2 1 1
White 19 9 9 14 16
2 or More 47 34 28
Data Source: PEIMS Submission 1.
Office of Campus and District Accountability
Mendez Page 13 June 2013
TELPAS - Students Testing Over Two Years Test at Beginner Level in Second Year
Group
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 End Goal
# Tested
2 Yrs
# Beginning
2012%
# Tested
2 Yrs
# Beginning
2013% Improvement Goal Target
All Students 304 4 1% 283 3 1% 0.75Decrease % ELL
students scoring
at beginning
level on
TELPAS Reading
African American - - - * * * 0.00
Hispanic 304 4 1% 280 3 1% 0.75
White - - - * * * 0.00
EcD 298 4 1% 276 3 1% 0.75
Special Ed 19 1 5% 28 3 11% 8.00
Data Source: Contractor's Electronic Files
Student Fitness
Sex Ethnicity
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Body Composition:
Body Mass Index
Cardiovascular:
Mile Run/Pacer
Body Composition:
Body Mass Index
Cardiovascular:
Mile Run/Pacer
Body Composition:
Body Mass Index
Cardiovascular:
Mile Run/Pacer
TestedHealthy
Zone% Tested
Healthy
Zone% Tested
Healthy
Zone% Tested
Healthy
Zone% Tested
Healthy
Zone% Tested
Healthy
Zone%
F Asian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F African American 67 39 58% 67 38 57% 62 25 40% 62 18 29% 62 28 45% 62 21 34%
F Hispanic 850 445 52% 850 437 51% 904 421 47% 893 399 45% 757 416 55% 755 372 49%
F White 8 8 >99% 8 8 >99% 9 7 78% 9 3 33% 8 6 75% 8 6 75%
F 925 492 53% 925 483 52% 975 453 46% 964 420 44% 827 450 54% 825 399 48%
M Asian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M African American 71 42 59% 71 50 70% 94 57 61% 94 72 77% 74 40 54% 74 56 76%
M Hispanic 899 385 43% 895 568 63% 987 361 37% 974 526 54% 853 360 42% 843 490 58%
M White 9 4 44% 9 9 >99% 26 8 31% 26 17 65% 21 6 29% 21 7 33%
M 979 431 44% 975 627 64% 1107 426 38% 1094 615 56% 948 406 43% 938 553 59%
total 1904 923 48% 1900 1110 58% 2082 879 42% 2058 1035 50% 1775 856 48% 1763 952 54%
Data Source: AISD Fitnessgram
Recommended