GRUPPO TELECOM ITALIA
Telecom Italia Future Centre
Where P2P ?… over the clouds… into the clouds… aside the clouds? ► R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 2
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
P2P Technology (a simple view) ► P2P Pros ...
► P2P system resources are often "free", coming from individuals which volunteer their machines' CPUs, storage, and bandwidth
► ... and Cons► P2P systems lack a centralized administrative entity that owns and
controls the peer resources. This makes it hard to ensure high levels of availability and performance.
► Decentralized control also limits trust. Users can inspect the memory and storage of a running application, meaning that applications cannot safely store confidential information unencrypted on peers. Nor can the application developer count on any particular quantity of resources being dedicated on a machine, or on any particular reliability of storage. These obstacles have made it difficult to monetize p2p services. It should come as no surprise that, so far, the most successful p2p applications have been free, with Skype being a notable exception.
► The freeriding phenomenon (and the tragedy of commons)Excerpts from http://berkeleyclouds.blogspot.com/
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 3
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
P2P as a complementary technology for Cloud Computing ?
► P2P “techniques are often useful in building datacenter-scale applications, including datacenter-scale applications that are hosted in the cloud”
► Actually the Key-Value Store techniques are often exploited by big data centers
► Amazon Dynamo (see
http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2007/10/amazons_dynamo.html)
► Pando, Abacast, ...
Excerp
ts f
rom
htt
p:/
/berk
ele
yclo
ud
s.b
log
sp
ot.
com
/
App 1 App 2 … Appl m
DISTRIBUTED APPLICATIONS
Node 1 Node 2 … Node n
DISTRIBUTED HASH TABLE
put (H(key), value); get (H(key), data);
H(Key) is a hashing function of the Key
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 4
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
DistributedComputing
File Sharing
Collaboration
Platforms
Communication
DataStorage
Search EngineDark nets
• Freenet• F2F• GNUnet• …
• SETI@home• …
• Gnutella• Kazaa•Bit Torrent• …
• Jabber• …
• Skype• …
• OceanStore• BitVault• Peeriodata• …
• JXTA• Peers Toolkit • …
• YACY• …
P2P Systems
Or as an Alternative ? P2P Range of Applicability …
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 5
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Are Operators out of the emerging trend of the (Data) Service/Platform/Infrastructure as a Service ?
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 6
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
The Prevalent Paradigm For Services Is Client - Server► Client Server paradigm is used in Web Interactions
► New Services are taking advantage of this consolidated technology ► Rich Internet Application
► Cloud Computing
► And others...
► But ... Can the Data Centers grow forever?► Google maintains over 450,000 servers (estimates)
► http://www.tnl.net/blog/2004/04/30/how-many-google-machines/
► Google Data Centers: $3,000 A Square Foot?
► http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2007/11/12/google-data-centers-3000-a-square-foot/
► Estimates of the power required for over 450,000 servers range upwards of 20 megawatts, which cost on the order of US$2 million per month in electricity charges
Web Client(Browser)
Web Client(Browser)
Web Client(Browser)
Internet
Web Server
http
http
http
http
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 7
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
P2P Computing as a competitor of Client Server?
Capacity (HD System) = (bi, si, fi, pi)
Where:bi = bandwidth of node isi = storage of node ifi = files of node ipi = processing of node i
Capacity (Centralized System) = {bS, sS, fS, pS}
Where:bS = bandwidth of the Server SystemsS = storage of the Server SystemfS = files stored in the Sever SystempS = processing in the Server System
Optimization isa problem
Optimization isa function of
a business model
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 8
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.gapinvoid.com
A Few Issues
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 9
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Example of Projects trying to overcome P2P Cons ... The nanodatacenter (http://www.nanodatacenters.eu/)
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 10
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Autonomic Computing ► What is it? (from wikipedia)
► IBM has defined the following four functional areas:
► Self-Configuration
► Self-Healing
► Self-Optimization
► Self-Protection
► Autonomic Networking follows the concept of Autonomic Computing. Its ultimate aim is to apply autonomic concepts to Networks.
► Functions of an Autonomic Network:
► Autognostic, Configuration management, Policy management, Autodefense, Security
► Connection Fabric (i.e., The connection fabric supports the interaction with all the elements and sub-systems of the autonomic system)
► Principles of Autonomic Networking
► Compartmentalization (how to implement the operational rules and administrative policies for a given communication context)
► Function re-composition
► Atomization
► Closed control loop
htt
p:/
/ww
w-0
3.ibm
.com
/serv
ers
/ese
rver/
zseri
es/
zos/
sm/a
uto
nom
ic.h
tml
Why? Millions of pervasive nodes!! There is the need of a new approachUsers should be “bothered” by such a cumbersome task!
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 11
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Example Of Waste Of Resources► Actually a p2p Overlay
Network is considered “infrastructure-less”, but ...
► In reality it is using the network infrastructure ...
► Without optimization► E.g., two nodes seen as
adjacent by the p2p network can be very far each other. T-Lab suggests mechanisms to improve the situation
Overlay Net
► There is the need to manage the network resources in order to give a fair service to ALL the users.
► There is the need to cooperate► Needs for interoperability: means
definition of common protocols and functions
See f
or
insta
nce h
ttp
://w
ww
.cam
bri
dg
e-m
it.o
rg/p
roje
ct/
hom
e/d
efa
ult
.asp
x?o
bjid
=2
31
3
P4P and IETF ALTO are trying to solve these problems
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 12
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Application of Gossiping Algorithm to FCAPS areas (courtesy of CASCADAS)
► fault detection and recovery
► for each contract of type T there is a “back-up” contract, to be used if B fails;
► the nodes in achieving(T) updates the back-up contract in case B’ fails;
► the nodes in contracting(T) help A in case B and B’ fails;
► load balancing
► when B’ is under-loaded, B’ informs all its neighbors in achieving(T);
► if B, one of the neighbors of B’, is overloaded, it answers to B’ by accepting the offer;
► when A, with an active contract with B, sends a new request, B informs A to redirect its contract to B’;
► Usable as the “stand-by” algorithm for power saving
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 13
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Simulation snapshots (from Cascadas)
State of Nodes with distributed LB
Legenda:Nodes available to get trafficNodes in “normal load”Nodes in “overload”
State of Nodes without LB
Thanks to A. Manzalini, C. Moiso
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 14
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Cross Layer Design: The End Of The OSI Model??
http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb12/verteilte_systeme/forschung/adhoc_routing_emul
Wireless Networks are pushing for a closer cooperation of functions in order to better respond to a fast changing communication environment:
• Reflective middleware (able to adapt)
• Cross Layer Design (ability to get the relevant information from any OSI layer)
• No Network Transparency
• Protocol dependence of the middleware
• Cognitive Layer (it can perceive current network conditions, and then plan, decide and act on those conditions)
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 15
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
A glimpse to the future ...
►DirecNet: A group of industry players is proposing an open-standard directional networking system designed to provide 1-gigabit-per-second data communication with anyone in a network on the ground, in the air or at sea, within hundreds of miles. The planned mobile mesh network, known as DirecNet, will use a network-friendly data link waveform to provide secure Internet Protocol communications up to 1 gbps for all types of air and surface platforms. DirecNet would use fast-steered directional antennas to substantially boost link power and operating range, and to permit reuse of radio frequency (RF) spectrum. Any DirecNet node can serve as a relay. This will multiply connectivity and extend the range to beyond line of sight.”(http://www.military-information-technology.com/print_article.cfm?DocID=1539)
► The DirecNet™ Task Force anticipates the completion of the specification within 2 years (https://www.opengroup.org/conference-live/uploads/40/11007/Forum_Reports.pdf#search=%22goals%20direcnet%20military%22)
GRUPPO TELECOM ITALIA
Telecom Italia Future Centre
Leveraging the TELCO infrastructure
www.gapinvoid.com
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 17
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Incipit► Positive Dilemmas: Network Operators should investigate disruptive scenarios
for Future Communications and Services in order to be aware of how to transform their biz models and exploit network and service infrastructures;
► One of the most challenging scenario is characterized by:► High pervasiveness (computing systems distributed and connected
everywhere);► Connectivity as a commodity;► Structure as Network of Networks (adaptive networks);► Intelligence at the edges (terminals and end points);
► This scenario is highly disruptive as it implies moving intelligence at the edge of the network reinforcing the end-to-end argument and an open environment for services;
► There is a need of understanding:► The potential evolution of this scenario (in terms of architectures,
technologies and services);► Which is the role of the Network Operator (biz model, architectures,
technologies, …);
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 18
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Architectural vision and principles
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 19
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Next: Open Questions► Which mix of networking and computing paradigms and
technologies will enable the scenario (characterized by high pervasivity, with connectivity as a commodity and Network of Networks) ?
► How to optimize allocation, sharing and management of pervasive resources, to guarantee the best Users’ experience whilst reducing the systems and Operators’ costs ?
► How to ensure the sustainability of the entire ecosystem, to avoid “Tragedy of Commons” due to unplanned usage of shared resources ?
► How to create, nurture and protect an ecosystem ?
R. Minerva, A. Manzalini, C. Moiso/Future Centre 20
Network of Networks
All
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Further contacts
http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/2006_03.html
Recommended