CIVIL LIBERTIES
BILL OF RIGHTS#1-#10
FEDERAL….
STATES(#14)INCORPORATION
STUDENT BILL OF RIGHTS
BILL OF RESPONSIBILITIES
4.KEY CONCEPTS
1.GUARANTEED
2.RELATIVE….NOT ABSOLUTE
3. APPLY TO ALL
4.RIGHTS IN CONFLICT…EXAMPLES…
FREE PRESS (1)VS.
FAIR TRIAL (6)
FREE SPEECH (1)VS.
PUBLIC ORDER
CULTURAL CONFLICTS
RELIGION
LANGUAGE
SEXUAL PREFERENCE
hola Hello Bonjour
1ST AMENDMENT5 PARTS….
R-S-P-P-A
SPEECH11 EXAMPLES…
1.PRIOR RESTRAINT
PENTAGON PAPERSNY TIMES v. US
1971
HAZLEWOOD – 1988SCHOOL PAPER
2.CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER
U.S. v. SCHENK - 1919
“MOVIE…MOVIE”
GITLOW CASE – 192514TH AMENDMENT
“incorporation”
“STATES”
3.“IMMINENT THREAT”
BRANDENBURGv. OHIO - 1969
4.LIBELAKER IS A*&%$#$%*
5.SLANDER
AKER IS A BUM!
AKER V. NOLCOX
2010
“SEDITION”SPEECH VS. THE GOVERNMENT
6.OBSCENITYMILLER v. CALIF.
1973
BETHEL V. FRASER1986
MORSE V. FREDERICK (2007)
7.PREFERRED POSITION
8.LEAST RESTRICTIVE RULE
9.SYMBOLIC SPEECH
TINKER CASE - 1969
TEXAS v. JOHNSONTEXAS v. JOHNSON19891989
“FLAG BURNING”“FLAG BURNING”
GREGORY JOHNSON AND LAWYER
10.CORPORATE SPEECH
11. $$$ “SPEECH”BUCKLEY v. VALEO (1976)CITIZENS UNITED (2010)
RELIGION“FIRST 16 WORDS”
E & E
EXERCISE“BELIEF-SPEECH-
CONDUCT DISTINCTION”
WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH
1.POLYGAMYU.S. v REYNOLDS-
1898
2.MEDICAL CARE
3.EDUCATION“AMISH
EXCEPTION”
4. MILITARY CLAY v. U.S. - 1971
“CONSCIENTIOUSOBJECTOR”
5. CONFIDENTIALITY
ESTABLISHMENT7 EXAMPLES…
“ separation of church and state????”
LEMON v. KURTZMAN –1971
THE LEMON TEST
“EXCESSIVE ENTANGLEMENT”
1. “I PLEDGE…”
2. PRAYER IN SCHOOL
ENGEL v. VITALE1962
3. PUBLIC TAX $
EVERSON v. N.J. 1947-BUSING $$
“BENEVOLENT NEUTRALITY”
4. EPPERSON V. ARK(EVOLUTION)
5. EQUAL ACCESS(1984)
6. SUNDAY BUSINESS
7. SCHOOL CALENDARS
2ND AMENDMENT“THE ,,,,,,,,,,,,,”
Search Results
Page 2
U.S. V. LOPEZ - 1995
COMMERCECLAUSE!!!
COMMERCECLAUSE!!!
COMMERCE CLAUSE!!!
CLAUSE DE COMMERCE!!
商務條
ПУНКТ ТОРГОВЛИ
CLAUSOLA SUL COMMERCIO
D.C. V. HELLER (2008)**D.C.’S BAN ON INDIVIDUAL
HANDGUNS RULED UNCONSITUTIONAL
3RD AMENDMENT
4TH AMENDMENT
STUDENT SEARCHES
N.J. v. T.L.O. - 1984
REASONABLE SUSPICION
1. SEARCH WARRANT
PROBABLE CAUSE
FIVEEXCEPTIONS
A. PLAIN VIEW
B. HOT PURSUIT
C. MOVABLE SCENE
DRUGS
D. SUBSEQUENT TO AN ARREST…
E. CONSENT
2. THE EXCLUSIONARY
RULE
3.“GOOD-FAITH EXCEPTION”
MAPP v. OHIO -1961“incorporated exclusionary
rule”
TERRY V. OHIO (1968)“STOP AND FRISK” (yes)
KYLLO V. U.S. (2001)THERMAL IMAGING? (no)
USA PATRIOT ACTPG. 519
5TH AMENDMENT“DUE PROCESS”
1.SELF-INCRIMINATION
ESCOBEDO V. ILL. (1964)
* CONFESSION WITHOUT LAWYER PRESENT
INADMISSABLE#5 AND #6
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA - 1966
2. GRAND JURY“INDICTMENT”
3. DOUBLE JEOPARDY
4. EMINENT DOMAIN
“THEY PAVED PARADISE…”
KELO v. CITY OF NEW LONDON (2005)
“TAKINGS CLAUSE”
6th AMENDMENT3 PARTS….
1. SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL
2. IMPARTIAL JURY
3. COUNSEL(ATTORNEY)
GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT – 1963(#6)
7TH AMENDMENT
8TH AMENDMENT“CRUEL AND UNUSUAL
PUNISHMENT”
FURMAN v. GEORGIA - 1972
GREGG v. GEORGIA1976
ROPER V. SIMMONS2005
18
PRE-ROPER
X
18
17
16
ATKINS V. VIRGINIA(2002)
…BANS EXECUTION OF MENTALLY
RETARDED
SCHOOLS: “CORPORAL PUNISHMENT”
EXCESSIVE FINES OR BAIL
9TH AMENDMENT“OTHER RIGHTS NOT
ENUMERATED”
10TH AMENDMENT“RESERVE CLAUSE”
CH. 19 – CIVIL RIGHTS
SUSPECT CLASSIFICATIONS
STRICT SCRUTINY
REASONABLENESS
INCOME???
RACE???
GENDER???
AGE???
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
CIVIL RIGHTS
SHIFT….CONGRESS
TOCOURT
14TH AMENDMENT1868
“DUE PROCESS & EQUAL PROTECTION”
SELECTIVEINCORPORATION
PLESSY v. FERGUSON -1896
1938 – LLOYD GAINESpg. 529
ADA LOIS SIPUEL1948
1950- HEMAN SWEATT
1954 – LINDA BROWN“DELIBERATE
SPEED”
DE JURE BY LAW…
VS.DE FACTOIN FACT…
SWANN v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG B.O.E. - 1971
BACK TO CONGRESS….4 CHANGES…
1. PUBLIC OPINION
2. MEDIA COVERAGE
3. JFK ASSASSINATION
4. 1964 ELECTIONSD-D-D
LIST ON????537?
538?
539?
537
PROFILING
WOMEN AND EQUAL RIGHTS
ABORTION RIGHTS“PRIVACY”
#4-#9-#14
GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT – 1965
“PRIVACY”
ROE v. WADE – 1973…BANNED STATE
LAWS THAT BANNED
ABORTION…
TRIMESTERS…
NORMAMcCORVEY
HYDE AMENDMENT1976
WEBSTER1989 – STATE $$$
CASEY1992
“ UNDUE BURDEN”
24-HOUR WAITING PERIOD??
PARENTAL NOTIFICATION/CONSENT
STATE LAWS TODAY…
HEADED TO THE SUPREME COURT…
FMLA – 199312 WEEKS
UNPAID LEAVE
ROSTKER v.GOLDBERG -1981
LOVING V. VIRGINIA1967
“INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE”
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
BAKKE CASE – 1978QUOTAS???
THE BOLLINGER CASES2003
U. OF MICHIGAN
+20??
ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS
VS. PENA (1995)
CONSTITUTION PROTECTS PERSONS,
NOT GROUPS
PG. 545 - NATURALIZATION
ADA - 1990