CFD Analysis of Mixing in Polymerization Reactor
ByHaresh Patel
Supervisors: Dr. R. Dhib &Dr. F. Ein-MozaffariIP
R 2007
2
Outline• Introduction• Model development• Simulation • Model Setup for Fluent• Results and discussion• Conclusions• Future work• Questions IP
R 2007
3
Introduction
• CFD is a simulation tool to analyze a system having transport equations of mass, momentum and energy.
• Originally developed for aerospace and now it is being expanded to other fields.
• Flow domain is divided into large number of small cells and one equation is written for each cell for each transport equation and then it is solved.
IPR 20
07
4
Introduction• Polymerization is a complex reaction.• Viscosity increase very rapidly during
polymerization.• Mixing plays an important role in deciding the
conversion and the quality of polymer formed.• Several studies are reported to relate mixing
with polymerization but they are of limited use.• CFD has been used for tubular reactors.• No attempt has been reported for
polymerization in CSTR.IP
R 2007
5
Kinetic Model• Styrene can be polymerized in absence of
Initiator.• Thermal initiation• Propagation• Termination
• Steady-state hypothesis
•⎯→⎯ 123 RM Kth
11 ≥⎯→⎯+ •+
• rRMR rKp
r
1, ≥⎯→⎯+ +•• srPRR sr
Ktcsr
tc
th
KMKR
3][2][ =IP
R 2007
6
Kinetic Model
• Propagation rate
whereKp = A p exp(-E p / RT)Similarly for Kth & Ktc
][RMkR pp −=
•Values of A p, A th , A tc , E p , E th and E tc were taken fromDhib.et.al.(2000).
11 ≥⎯→⎯+ •+
• rRMR rKp
r
IPR 20
07
7
Physical Properties
]/)3597
13591327(923.2501.19
032.12[/1109091.11)ln(
3
232
1413.00
TW
WWWW
WMT
p
pppp
pw
+
++−++−
++−=µ
•Zero shear viscosity(Kim and Nauman(1992))
•Shear viscosity (Kim and Nauman(1992)) sPa .)35000/1/( 60.02.1
00 γµµµ +=
3/)605.00.1250()1)(918.07.1174( mKgWTWT pp −+−−=ρ
•Density (Soliman et.al.(1994))
•Cp=1880 J/kg.k•K =0.126 J/m.s.k•Dm=2.0 x 10-9 m2/s
} (Soliman et.al.(1994))IP
R 2007
8
Reactor Geometry
Tank diameter = 14 cm Liquid level = 26 cm Impeller type = pitched blade No. of blades = 4 Impeller diameter = 8.4 cm Impeller speed = 100 to 1000 rpmInlet diameter = 1 cm Outlet diameter = 1.5 cm Reactor temperature = 140oC
• Discretised domain of a reactor• 372,000 cellsIP
R 2007
9
Governing equations
0)( =⋅∇→
vρ
• Continuity Eq.
• Momentum
→→→→
++⋅∇+−∇=⋅∇+∂∂ Fgpvvvt
ρτρρ )()()(
]32)[( Ivvv T
→→→
⋅∇−∇+∇= µτwhere IPR 20
07
10
Governing equations •Energy
heffjjeff SvJhTKPEvEt
+⋅+−∇⋅∇=+⋅∇+∂∂ →→→
∑ ))(())(()( τρρ
2
2vhE +=
jj
jhYh ∑=
∫=T
T
pj
ref
jdTchIP
R 2007
11
Governing equations •Species
iiii RJYvYt
+⋅−∇=⋅∇+∂∂ →→
)()( ρρ
imii YDJ ∇−=→
,ρ
•Only monomer species transport equation was solved andpolymer mass fraction was obtained by (1- wm).IP
R 2007
12
Discretisation• Flow domain was divided into 372,000
small volumes.
dvSAdAdvdvt vv
∫∫∫∫ +⋅∇Γ=⋅+∂∂ →→→
φφρφρφ
∑∑→→→
+⋅∇Γ=⋅+∂∂ faces
ffff
faces
f
N
f
N
ff VSAAvv
tφφφφρρφ
• Integrating on each cell volume
• Discretisation
• For steady state, Above equations result in algebraic equations.
IPR 20
07
13
Discretisation• Finally all equations can be
written as
baa nbnb
nbp += ∑ φφ
• This algebraic equations were solved using Gauss-Seidel with algebraic multigrid (AMG) method.
P
IPR 20
07
14
Model set-up for Fluent• Grid generation in MixSim• Define in Fluent
•Material properties•Boundary conditions•Selecting discretisation techniques•Select under-relaxation factor•Modify Code by hooking UDF•Turn on monitors to check Convergence•Turn on equations to solve•Run Program to solve
IPR 20
07
15
Boundary conditions• Divide flow domain in two regions(for MRF)
-Impeller region(solved in rotating frame)-Far region(solved in stationary frame)
IPR 20
07
16
Boundary conditions •Tank Inlet
-Specified Normal velocity-Species mass fraction of styrene=1.0-Inlet temperature=140o C
•Tank Wall -No slip boundary for momentum-Zero diffusive flux-Fixed temperature=140o C
•Tank Outlet -Zero normal gradient for all the variables
•Liquid level-Symmetry, No normal gradientIP
R 2007
17
Case set up• Discretisation
• Second-order Upwind for all equations• Pressure-Velocity Coupling
• SIMPLEC algorithm • Under-relaxation to control change in variable
φαφφ ∆+= old• Most imp. for species • Started with 0.8 for species
• User-Define function(UDF) was written in C programming language for reaction source term and attached to Fluent.
• Monitored -Surface integral of the outflow of styrene-Residuals for each transport equation-Sum of velocity magnitude on symmetry
IPR 20
07
18
SolverUpdate properties
Solve U,V and W
Solve pressure correction
Update velocity,mass fluxand pressure
Solve species and energy transport
Solution Converged?No Yes
Stop
IPR 20
07
19
Results and Discussion• Computational time
• Computational time is directly related to no. of cells,no. of equations and no. of iterations.
• Our model consists of- approx. 372,000 cells- momentum, energy, species, pressure correction
equations and some other interpolation calculations
- approx. 240,000 iterations for each equationIPR 20
07
20
Results and Discussion• Computational time
• Steady state simulations were run on super-computing facility of HPCVL
•24 to 35 CPUs were used for each simulation
•Flow domain was divided into no. of partitionsequal to no. of CPUs available. Each CPU was assigned one grid.
•It took 4 to 5 days for each run.IPR 20
07
21
Results and Discussion• Convergence Monitor
•Residual monitoring
IPR 20
07
22
Results and Discussion• Convergence Monitor
•Sum of Velocity magnitude on symmetry
IPR 20
07
23
Results and Discussion• Convergence Monitor
•Styrene Outflow (kg/h)
IPR 20
07
24
Results and Discussion• Simulations Scenario
• Effect of impeller speed-100, 500 and 1000 rpm - Conversion analysis and comparison
• Effect of residence time- 4 different residence time
• Effect of input-output location- bottom inlet location- 100 rpm & 500 rpmIP
R 2007
Results and Discussion• Contours for Styrene mass fraction for 144 min.
residence time
Contours of Mass fraction of styreneFLUENT 6.3 (3d, dp, pbns, spe, lam)
Mar 21, 2007
1.00e+009.70e-019.40e-019.10e-018.80e-018.50e-018.20e-017.90e-017.60e-017.30e-017.00e-016.70e-016.40e-016.10e-015.80e-015.50e-015.20e-014.90e-014.60e-014.30e-014.00e-01
Z
YX
At 100 rpm At 500 RPM
IPR 20
07
26
Results and Discussion• Path lines for the particles entering at inlet (colored by
styrene mass fraction)
IPR 20
07
27
Results and Discussion• Styrene mass fraction contours for 1000rpm and 144 min.
residence time
IPR 20
07
28
Results and Discussion• Conversion Analysis and Comparison
][RMkR pp −=tc
th
KMKR
3][2][ =IP
R 2007
29
Results and Discussion• Reactive flow vs. Non reactive flow
•viscosity rises to approximately 10,000 times the viscosity of styrene
IPR 20
07
30
Results and Discussion• Reactive flow vs. Non reactive flow
•Velocity Magnitudes (m/s) for non-reactive mass
IPR 20
07
31
Results and Discussion• Reactive flow vs. Non reactive flow
•Velocity Magnitudes (m/s) for reactive mass
IPR 20
07
32
Results and Discussion• Effect of Residence time at 500 rpm
IPR 20
07
33
Results and Discussion• Effect of Bottom inlet
• Contours of Species mass fraction for100rpm and 144 min. residence time
Contours of Mass fraction of styreneFLUENT 6.3 (3d, dp, pbns, spe, lam)
Mar 21, 2007
1.00e+009.75e-019.50e-019.25e-019.00e-018.75e-018.50e-018.25e-018.00e-017.75e-017.50e-017.25e-017.00e-016.75e-016.50e-016.25e-016.00e-015.75e-015.50e-015.25e-015.00e-01
Z
YX
IPR 20
07
34
Results and Discussion• Effect of Bottom inlet
• Contours of Species mass fraction for500rpm and 144min residence time
Contours of Mass fraction of styreneFLUENT 6.3 (3d, dp, pbns, spe, lam)
Mar 21, 2007
1.00e+009.75e-019.50e-019.25e-019.00e-018.75e-018.50e-018.25e-018.00e-017.75e-017.50e-017.25e-017.00e-016.75e-016.50e-016.25e-016.00e-015.75e-015.50e-015.25e-015.00e-01
Z
YX
IPR 20
07
35
Results and Discussion• Conversion Analysis for bottom inlet
IPR 20
07
36
Conclusions• CFD was proved to be a good tool to
analyze polymerization reactor.• Conversion predicted by CFD was better
than CSTR model.• Detailed flow visualization was made
possible. IPR 20
07
37
Future work
• To extend the model to analyze initiatorpolymerization in CSTR.
IPR 20
07
38
Thanks
IPR 20
07
39
Questions?
IPR 20
07