8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
1/38
Kantian Ethics, Rights, and
Virtue
Topic 3
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
2/38
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
3/38
An Ethic of Duty
An Action is morally RIGHT if ONLY if the actor is motivated by a GOOD
WILL .
Its NOT a matter of the individualweighing up consequences .
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
4/38
Good will ...
Nothing is good in itself except a good will.Goodness of the will depends on the use of them.
E.g. some students are smart in using computer,hacked through the universitys security system.
Intelligent and courageous but for the WRONGreason.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
5/38
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
6/38
Then, how what ...
#!*%^@
Do we determine our duty?Makes an act morally right?
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
7/38
Kants ...
Utilitarianism scores that results willdetermine the moral judgement. But Kant
believed that reasons alone can give us theabsolute moral truth and discover our senseof duty.
He championed for the Categorical =Absolute Imperative = Command
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
8/38
1st Categorical ImperativeAct Only According To That Maxim By Which
You Can At The Same Time Will That ItShould Become A Universal Law.
His absolute moral truth must be logically consistent,free from internal contradiction.
I.e. Robin Hood act of stealing from rich give to poor is wrong, CANNOT say for a good cause!
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
9/38
In understanding the First Categorical Imperative
Maxim is defined as saying that expresses a general truthor rule of behaviour.
( Source: Oxford Dictionary)
Will = uniquely human capacity to act from principle.
Action done for rational principled reasons - from a senseof duty , if our act is from duty, our act has moral worth!
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
10/38
In understanding the FirstCategorical Imperative.
Place ourselves in the shoes of the receiving party before acting. If the action is going to bring painrather than happiness to us, then the action is notethical.
Put aside our self interests.
An act is morally right if and only if we can will itto become a universal law of conduct.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
11/38
2nd Categorical Imperative
Act So That You Treat Humanity, Whether In Your OwnPerson Or In That Of Another, Always As An End and
Never As A Means Only.
Kants view is that people, unlike things, ought never to bemerely used.
I.e. employee may be hired for their labor, skills, knowledgeand abilities, but must always be treated with respect as a
person.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
12/38
In organizational context
3 points of applications:Categorical imperative gives us firm rules to follow inmoral decision making. No matter what theconsequences may be or who does it, some actions are
always wrong e.g. lying, cheating, greed etc.
Stress on importance of humanistic dimension , notusing / treat others (humans) as a means to an end but
as an end themselves.
Importance of motivation and acting on principles -sense of duty rather than self - interest.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
13/38
Critiques on Kants Theory
What exactly has moral worth? Because if an act isbased on self interest has no moral worth - many moraltheorists feel that Kant is too severe on this point.
Is the categorical imperative an adequate test ofrightness? Kant said moral rules are without exception.
What does it mean to treat people as means? It is notclear WHEN people are really being treated as endsand merely as means. Because at times we freely chooseto do it!
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
14/38
Despite the critiques ...Kants ethics yield two important results: The principles of universalizability and respect for
persons.
Universalizability- the persons reasons for acting must be reasons that everyone could act on at least in principle.
Kantianism also provides strong foundation for rights .
Individual human rights must be acknowledged andinviolable.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
15/38
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
16/38
Group discussion:
Read case study Poverty and Pollutionand answer questions a, b and c.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
17/38
Learning outcomes
At the end of this lecture, students will beable to:
1. Define the concept of rights.2. Recognize the kinds of rights.3. Explain John Lockes Natural RightsTheory
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
18/38
Any ethical theory must also give anaccount of the rights we have and also of
what is just or fair.
(Boatright JR, 2007)
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
19/38
Rights
Rights play an important role in business ethics , as wellas all moral issues.
Employers, employees, consumers, general public,human, non-human each have our own rights.
United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 which set forth basic humanrights for all people.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
20/38
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
21/38
Kinds of Rights
1. Legal and moral rights
2. Specific and general rights
3. Negative and positive rights
( Source: Boatright, J.R, 5 th Edition, page: 38 and 39)
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
22/38
1. Legal and M oral r ights
- Legal - recognized and enforced as part oflegal system . E.g. the Employment Act 1955lays down provisions to protect workers.
- M oral rights that we ought to have out ofgeneral ethical rules and
principles . Do not depend
on the existence of legal system. Fore.g. as a student, you have the right tobe graded fairly.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
23/38
2. Specif ic and general r ights
Specific - involve identifiableindividuals or parties e.g. in
contracts . It creates mutual rightsor duties for these individuals or parties.
General - involves claims against everyone, or
humanity in general . E.g. Freedomof speech. Enforcement of this right restswith the whole community.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
24/38
3. Negative and Positive r ights
Negative - correlated with obligations on the part of others torefrain from acting in ways that interfere with our own freedom ofaction.
It relates to the right of human beings to be free from outside
interference. i.e. right to property, choice of religion, freedom frominjury and privacy.
Positive - impose obligations on other people to provide us withsome good or service and thereby to act positively on our behalf.
It reflects the vital interests that human beings have in receiving certain benefits . E.g. adequate health care, provision of childeducation., the right to a decent standard of living as proclaimed bythe United Nations 1948 Human Rights Charter.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
25/38
Natural rights
Relates to United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rightsin 1948 which set forth basic human rights for all people.
Natural rights focuses on HUMAN RIGHTS .
These are rights that belong to all persons purely by virtue of beinghumans irrespective of race, sex, nationality, etc.
Two main features of human rights:
- Universality - possessed by everyone.
- Unconditionality - human rights do not depend on any particularpractices or institutions in society.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
26/38
Natural RightsThe idea of natural rights long been debated inhistory going back to the ancient Greeks, who heldthat there is a higher law that applies to all
persons everywhere and serves as a standard forevaluating the laws of the states.
Both Roman law and the medieval church adoptedthis idea and developed it into a comprehensivelegal theory.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
27/38
Natural Rights Theory
The most influential natural rights theory presented by John Locke (1633-1704) in his
famous Second Treatise ofGovernment(1690).
Locke began with the supposition of a stateof nature, which is the condition of human
beings in the absence of any government.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
28/38
John Lockes Natural Rights Theory Human beings have rights, even in the state of nature , andthat the justification for uniting into a state is to protectthese rights.
The most important natural right for Locke is the right to property.
Although the bounty of the earth is provided by God for the benefit of all, no one can make use of it without takingsome portion as ones own.
This is done by means of labour, which is a form of property.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
29/38
John Lockes theory cont..
Every man has property in his own person,
so [t] he labour of his body and the work ofhis hands are properly his.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
30/38
Learning outcomes
At the end of this lecture, students will beable to:
Explain Aristotles Virtue Ethics Theory. Recognize virtues to be emulated to lead agood life.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
31/38
Aristotles Theory of Virtue Ethics Asks: what kind of person should we be?
According to Aristotle, ethics enable us to lead successful rewarding lives - good life.
Virtue is a character trait that manifests itself
in habitual action . E.g. honesty cannot consistin telling the truth once; it is rather a trait of aperson who tells the truth as a general practice.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
32/38
According to Aristotle, moral virtues are habitsthat enable a person to live according to reason.
When a person knows and chooses a reasonablemiddle ground between going too far enough hisactions, emotions and desires, moral virtue . is a mean between two vices , one of excess and the
other of deficiency and .. it aims at hitting a mean in feeling (desires) and actions.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
33/38
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
34/38
How does one determine what is
reasonable?According to Aristotle, prudence is thevirtue that enables one to know what is
reasonable in a given situation.
Prudence being careful and sensible.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
35/38
Virtues that are universally accepted
as good.Honesty, sincerity, reliable, trustworthy,dependable, patience, prudence, benevolence (kind
and helpful), compassion, courage, courtesy,friendliness, moderation, self control, toleration.
Aristotle also included pride as well as shame asvirtues. We should be proud of ouraccomplishments ( not arrogant) and shame of ourfailures.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
36/38
Universally accepted bad values
Dishonesty, insincerity, unreliable,untrustworthy, undependable,
temperamental, arrogant.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
37/38
I n business ...Virtue ethics could be applied to business directly
by holding that the virtues of a good businessperson are the same as those of a good
person.
Business is a part of life why not apply goodvirtues of living in it? However, businesspeopleneed to engage themselves in business-relatedcharacter traits. E.g car ing, a good businessmanager must care for their employees and
customer but only to cer tain extent.
8/13/2019 CE Topic 3 Kantian Theory and Theory of Rights and Justice
38/38
Theories in ethics
Theories show what makes right actions rightthough what weve seen is that they are not
wholly incompatible.
All theories, however, championed for rights ofindividuals based on the principles of respect
for persons and agreement that certain virtuesare important to have.