Transcript
Page 1: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

A Taxonomy of Web 2.0 Technologies

(and the role of Twitter in Higher Education)

ALT-C 2010

Guy Saward, University of Hertfordshire

Page 2: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

What’s the point of Twitter?

Why a wiki?

Why not a blog?

How do I podcast my lectures?

Who Cares?

Page 3: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Participation

Engagement Enhancement

Page 4: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

WikisBlogs

Audio Video

RSS

Social Software

Microblog

TumblelogIM

Bookmarks

SMS

Forums

Email

Page 5: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Digital Literacy ≠ ICT skills

“Staff capability with ICT is a further dimension of the digital divide … and effective use of technology to enhance learning is as much of an issue as getting it to work” [JISC 2009]

Page 6: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Knowledge: explicitand tacit

ContentCommunication

Information:

transmission/decodeencoding/

Page 7: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Contentweb (1.0)

Which is “King”?

email

Communication

Page 8: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Contentbooks

What do we need?

people

Communication

Page 9: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Content

What have we got?

Communication

Page 10: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Contentreferenc

e

Communication

narrative

message

presence

Page 11: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Content

Communicationreference

narrative

message

presence

Page 12: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Online Reference materialWiki(pedia) as definitive web 2.0 reference

– large item size (lots of content on a page)– large collection size (lots of pages)

Delicious provide references – links other online content– smaller item size (1024 char in notes)

RSS provide references to updates– small items in themselves– non-persistant => no structure / search

wiki

social book marks

newsfeed

Page 13: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

References – How much content?Can construct an order based on how much content each technology can / typically support

Debatable what is web 2.0, e.g. RSS (yes?), ebooks (no?), annotations (yes?) => work to do

wikisocial book marks

RSSmore structure/ persistence

bigger itemsmore items

Page 14: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

blog tumblelog

microblog

mixed mediabigger itemsmore structure

Narrative

forum email SMSbigger item

mixed mediamore structure

/ context

Messaging

e-confer-ence

virtual world

online chat

mixed mediaeasier access

Presence

Page 15: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Reference material – Comms OrderCan order technology by how much communication each can / typically supports

Note: focus on primary purpose of each tech, e.g.wiki’s can have forums to support comms… but not defining character

wikisocial book marks

RSShigher freq.

& pushhigher push in change indicators

Page 16: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Classification of Web 2.0 Technologiescommunication

content

freq+sync

size+struct

wiki

blog forum

email

SMStwitter

online chat

tumblelog

social book marks

RSS

2Life

eConfer-ence

Page 17: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Who Cares?

Page 18: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

What’s the point of Twitter?

Why a wiki?

Why not a blog?

How do I podcast my lectures?

Page 19: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

How do I podcast my lectures?

Content: audio vs video vs slideshow

Comms: nothingnotification enclosure vs url stream vs

download auto vs

manual(New Oxford American Dictionary no help)

Page 20: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

tumblelog

microblog

mixed mediabigger itemsmore structure

tumblelog

microblogblog

wiki

blog

forum email SMSbigger item

mixed mediamore structure

/ context

e-confer-ence

virtual world

online chat

mixed mediaeasier access

wikisocial book marks

RSSmore structure/ persistence

bigger itemsmore items

bigger itemsmore items

bigger itemsmixed media more structure

/ persistence

more structure/ persistence

bigger itemsbetter structure?

bigger itemsmixed media

more structure/ persistence

more structure/ persistence

more items / structure

more structure/ persistence

more structure/ persistence

more persistence

Page 21: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

blog tumblelog

microblog

higher freq. / intensity

higher freq.

forum email SMS

e-confer-ence

virtual world

online chat

wikisocial book marks

RSS

comms classification

Page 22: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Does it help?

Page 23: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

blog tumblelog

microblog

forum email SMS

e-confer-ence

virtual world

online chat

wikisocial book marks

RSS

content

rankingby

CPD learners

Page 24: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

blog tumblelog

microblog

forum email SMS

e-confer-ence

virtual world

online chat

wikisocial book marks

RSS

comms

rankingby

CPD learners

Page 25: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Conclusions for CPD

Taxonomy answers basic questions provides structure for reflection identifies areas for development => content=ref, comms=msgs => student plans content focussedCreating content/comms

work in progress

Page 26: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Conclusions for Practice

Invest more time in fewer things

Design learning, select technologies

Convergence will blur the picture

Page 27: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Does it work for you?

Links with theory >

Page 28: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Application to Learning Theories

Objectivism• objective knowledge => content (creation of true

models of reality/knowledge by authorities)• transmission => comms (teacher-learner interact)

Constructivism• constructed knowledge => content (creation of

personal/shared knowledge by learner)• collaborative => comms ("effective", high content)• active => content (engage with/apply to)

Page 29: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

Application to Learning Theories

Community of Inquiry• social presence => comms (low content)• teaching presence => content (structure)• cognitive presence => high content needed to

"construct meaning through sustained comms"

Community of Practice• domain of practice => content• community to share/discuss/challenge => comms

Page 30: Categorising Web 2.0 Apps for Education

communication

content

freq+sync

size+struct

wikiblog

2Life

forum

email

SMStwitter

eConference

online chat

tumblelog

social bookmark

RSS

features•multimedia blog•tumblr/facebook

content•video, images•low text content

comms•comments/forum•track back

Technology Classification tumblelog