Transcript
Page 1: CASE STUDY: ELECTING · CASE STUDY: ELECTING THE CHALLENGE An incumbent democrat who many believed was running the best senate campaign in the country. Outside liberal special interest

SENATOR DAN SULLIVANCASE STUDY: ELECTING

T H E C H A L L E N G E

A n i n c u m b e n t d e m o c r a t w h o m a n y b e l i e v e d w a s r u n n i n g t h e b e s t s e n a t e c a m p a i g n i n t h e c o u n t r y .

O u t s i d e l i b e r a l s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t g r o u p s , i n c l u d i n g H a r r y R e i d ’ s S u p e r P A C a n d o r g a n i z e d l a b o r .

A n e x t r e m e l y c o m p e t i t i v e t h r e e - w a y p r i m a r y a g a i n s t t h e p o p u l a r L t . G o v e r n o r a n d t h e 2 0 1 0 G O P s e n a t e n o m i n e e .

T H E S O L U T I O N

T A R G E T C o n t a c t A n a l y z e

i 3 6 0 ’ s d a t a b a s e , w h i c h i n c l u d e s h u n d r e d s o f v a r i a b l e s o n e a c h i n d i v i d u a l , a s w e l l a s a f u l l s u i t e o f p r e d i c t i v e m o d e l s , f o r m e d t h e c o r e o f t h e c a m p a i g n ’ s d a t a a n d t a r g e t i n g o p e r a t i o n .

O u r a n a l y t i c s t e a m w o r k e d c l o s e l y w i t h t h e S u l l i v a n c a m p a i g n t o d e v e l o p a c u s t o m “ D e e p D i v e ” a n a l y s i s o f t h e r a c e .

O u r p r e d i c t i v e d i a l e r a n d m o b i l e c a n v a s s i n g a p p l i c a t i o n s p r o v i d e d r e a l - t i m e a c c e s s t o v o t e r d a t a v i a t h e c a m p a i g n ’ s d a t a b a s e .

O n N o v e m b e r 1 2 t h , 2 0 1 4 , n e w s n e t w o r k s c o n f i r m e d w h a t i 3 6 0 a n d t h e S u l l i v a n c a m p a i g n h a d k n o w n f o r d a y s – t h a t D a n S u l l i v a n h a d d e f e a t e d M a r k B e g i c h a n d w o u l d b e A l a s k a ’ s n e x t S e n a t o r .

T H E R E S U LT S

Page 2: CASE STUDY: ELECTING · CASE STUDY: ELECTING THE CHALLENGE An incumbent democrat who many believed was running the best senate campaign in the country. Outside liberal special interest

SENATOR DAN SULLIVANCASE STUDY: ELECTING

T H E C H A L L E N G E

A n i n c u m b e n t d e m o c r a t w h o m a n y b e l i e v e d w a s r u n n i n g t h e b e s t s e n a t e c a m p a i g n i n t h e c o u n t r y .

O u t s i d e l i b e r a l s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t g r o u p s , i n c l u d i n g H a r r y R e i d ’ s S u p e r P A C a n d o r g a n i z e d l a b o r .

A n e x t r e m e l y c o m p e t i t i v e t h r e e - w a y p r i m a r y a g a i n s t t h e p o p u l a r L t . G o v e r n o r a n d t h e 2 0 1 0 G O P s e n a t e n o m i n e e .

T H E S O L U T I O N

O n N o v e m b e r 1 2 t h , 2 0 1 4 , n e w s n e t w o r k s c o n f i r m e d w h a t i 3 6 0 a n d t h e S u l l i v a n c a m p a i g n h a d k n o w n f o r d a y s – t h a t D a n S u l l i v a n h a d d e f e a t e d M a r k B e g i c h a n d w o u l d b e A l a s k a ’ s n e x t S e n a t o r .

T H E R E S U LT S

T A R G E T C o n t a c t A n a l y z e

i 3 6 0 ’ s d a t a b a s e , w h i c h i n c l u d e s h u n d r e d s o f v a r i a b l e s o n e a c h i n d i v i d u a l , a s w e l l a s a f u l l s u i t e o f p r e d i c t i v e m o d e l s , f o r m e d t h e c o r e o f t h e c a m p a i g n ’ s d a t a a n d t a r g e t i n g o p e r a t i o n .

O u r a n a l y t i c s t e a m w o r k e d c l o s e l y w i t h t h e S u l l i v a n c a m p a i g n t o d e v e l o p a c u s t o m “ D e e p D i v e ” a n a l y s i s o f t h e r a c e .

O u r p r e d i c t i v e d i a l e r a n d m o b i l e c a n v a s s i n g a p p l i c a t i o n s p r o v i d e d r e a l - t i m e a c c e s s t o v o t e r d a t a v i a t h e c a m p a i g n ’ s d a t a b a s e .


Recommended