Transcript

“Brave new world": the challenges of managing quality in an international

branch campus

Professor Nigel Healey Pro-Vice-Chancellor (International)

Nottingham Trent University

5 May 2015

Overview

• What is an international branch campus (IBC)?

• How important are IBCs?

• Where do IBCs come from? Where are they located?

• Research study into managing IBCs

• The results: – The three dimensions of an IBC – The stakeholders of an IBC

• Conclusions

2

What is an international branch campus?

• Observatory on Borderless Higher Education (OBHE) 2012 definition: an IBC is:

• ‘a higher education institution that is located in another country from the institution which either originated it or operates it, with some physical presence in the host country;

• and which awards at least one degree in the host country that is accredited in the country of the originating institution’

3

How important are IBCs?

4

Where do they come from? IBCs by home region (at March 2014)

5

Asia  

Europe  

La-n  America  

Middle-­‐East  

North  America  

Oceania  

Source: C-BERT

Where are they located? IBCs by host region (March 2014)

6

Africa  

Asia  

Europe  

La-n  America  

Middle-­‐East  

North  America  

Oceania  

Source: C-BERT

The challenge of managing quality in an overseas subsidiary: what and how much to localize?

7

IBCs are different from foreign subsidiaries of multinational corporations because…

• Universities are not multinational corporations –  Public or not-for-profit –  Small, nationally-focused organizations - centre of gravity is the home campus –  Run by academics, not global career executives –  Traditional, arcane governance structures

• Higher education is not a competitive, unregulated market – Higher education is a public good – mostly subsidized, regulated – Quasi-command economy, not free market –  Information asymmetries – government control over quality assurance

8

If I knew the end of the world was tomorrow, I would move to a university campus …I would live much longer

Research study

Research questions:

1.  What are the key dimensions of the IBC that managers feel under pressure to localize?

2.  What are the main factors that influence their chosen degree of localization for each dimension?

3.  How do these factors, and so the optimal degree of localization, change over time?

9

Sample set

• Nine UK IBCs in United Arab Emirates, Malaysia, China

• 14 senior managers

• 5 experts (for background information)

• Interviews carried out in country, April-September 2014

• 90-120 minutes in length, transcribed and coded

10

The results: preliminary observations

• IBCs are diverse in scale and organizational form

• IBCs are not ‘branch campuses’ as commonly understood – they are private companies/universities in which the home university often has a minority stake

• Some IBCs (not the ones in the study) are just offices

• IBCs are subject to quality assurance and regulation by home and host government

• Universities often lack administrative expertise to effetively manage an IBC

11

Staff: how much to localize?

• Academic staff – Local staff – International staff – Seconded staff

• The trade-off of localizing staff:

12

Academic culture Cost of provision

Curriculum: how much to localize?

• Curriculum – Content – Pedagogy – Assessment – Internal quality assurance

• The trade-off of localizing curriculum:

13

Global equivalence Local relevance

Research: how much to localize?

• Research – Topics studied

• The trade-off of localizing research:

14

International excellence Local impact

The University of Imperialism

The University of Localization

The University of Globalization

Possible models of localization

What to localize?

Imperialism Localization Globalization

Staff X √ √

Curriculum X √ X

Research X √ √

16

The results: what stakeholders influence the degree of localization?

• External stakeholders: – Host country – government,

regulator, employers – Competitors – Students

• Internal stakeholders: – Joint venture partner – Home university – senior

management and staff

17

Perceived attitudes of stakeholders to localization

18

A framework for IBCs

19

Conclusions

• IBCs are the highest profile form of transnational education

• IBCs vary hugely, but all expose home university to potential financial and reputational risk

• Research suggests that to succeed, IBCs must localize their staff base, curriculum and research

• The degree of localization depends on the objectives and relative power of the main stakeholders

20

For more information:

• E-mail: [email protected]

• Website: http://nottinghamtrent.academia.edu/NigelHealey

• Website includes conferences presentations, papers and resources on transnational education

21


Recommended