Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation
art practice
Glenda Hobdell (aka LaBudda)
n7671296
Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Arts (Practice-led Research)
Visual Arts, MECA: School of Media, Entertainment and Creative Arts,
Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology
March 2014
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
i
i
Keywords
hybrid, heterogeneous media, liminal space, materiality, potentiality, Australian art,
practice-led methodology, installation art, Glenda Hobdell
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
ii
ii
Abstract
Addressing possibilities for authentic combinations of heterogeneous forms within
an installation setting, this research tested hybrid blends of the physical, digital and
temporal to explore liminal space and image. This practice led research reflected on
the creation of artworks from three perspectives – the material, the immaterial and
the hybrid – and in doing so, developed a new methodological structure that extends
conventional forms of triangulation. Comparative studies and evolutionary working
processes revealed distinctions and critical overlaps in artistic agency and in the
potentiality of the work. Framed by the development of both physical and digital
elements, this study looked closely at how each configuration sought hierarchical
presence, yet simultaneously coexisted, extending the visual and conceptual
potential of the work.
Contemporaneity challenged concepts of dual perspectives that were informed by
Jacque Derrida’s theories of binary opposition and Plato’s Simile of the Cave. Jean
Baudrillard, Frank Popper, Oliver Grau, Gilles Deleuze and Pierre Lévy’s theories
presented an historical continuum of virtuality toward an understanding of the
processual and transformational nature of virtual art. Analyses of contemporary
precedents within interactive installation works by Jeffrey Shaw and Wendy Mills,
together with consideration of mixed realities in current practice, informed the
development and presentation of the work.
Outcomes of the research demonstrated how utilising and recording transitional
processes of hybrid imagery could achieve a convergence of diverse, experiential
forms. “Hybrid authority” – an authentic convergence of disparate elements – was
articulated in the creation and public sharing of processual works. The resulting
exhibitions presented suggestions of altered perception and questioned oppositional
logic and assumptions of presence. Technical and physical manipulations of digital
renderings and tangible objects revealed an interplay between light and dark,
reflection and shadow, positive and negative, still and moving, corporeal and
immaterial – co-existing parallels in perspective that create an innovative framework
for practice.
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
iii
iii
Table of Contents
Keywords........................................................................................................................................i
Abstract..........................................................................................................................................ii
TableofContents......................................................................................................................iii
ListofFigures...............................................................................................................................v
StatementofOriginalAuthorship......................................................................................vii
Acknowledgements................................................................................................................viii
Chapter1: Introduction.................................................................................................1
Background...................................................................................................................................2
Significance,ScopeAndMethodologyOverview.............................................................3
ContextAndApproachToResearch....................................................................................4
Chapter2: ContextualReview.....................................................................................7
TheoreticalPrecursors–ActualAndVirtualArt............................................................8
GrauandBaudrillard:actualart,virtualartandthe‘real’...................................................8
Popper:recontextualisationandblurredboundaries.........................................................10
Whitehead,BourriardandDerrida:ThePotentialityofHybridPractice....................11
InfluentialPrecedentsAndMixedRealities...................................................................14
Makingthegreenonered(VirtualMacbeth)–KerreenEly‐HarperandAndrew
Burrell......................................................................................................................................................15
ConFIGURINGtheCAVE–JeffreyShaw......................................................................................17
Signing:messagesfromtheancestors|SiteofJudgement–WendyMills.....................19
Summaryandimplicationsforpractice..........................................................................20
Chapter3: ResearchDesign......................................................................................22
METHODOLOGYANDRESEARCHDESIGN.......................................................................22
Beyondtriangulation........................................................................................................................23
Doublehelixmethodology..............................................................................................................25
Basemodel...........................................................................................................................................................25Basemodelwithadditionofkeyterms..................................................................................................27
METHODS....................................................................................................................................29
PROCESSES.................................................................................................................................30
Chapter4: CreativeOutcomes..................................................................................31
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
iv
iv
ITERATIONS...............................................................................................................................31
Liminalspaces1..................................................................................................................................31
Thework..............................................................................................................................................................32
Theresultandreflection...............................................................................................................................33
Liminalspaces:escapingtheframe–Planninganddevelopment................................34
Connexion:space,place,time........................................................................................................38
Liminalspaces:escapingtheframe............................................................................................39
APPLICATIONOFDOUBLEHELIXMETHODOLOGYTOCREATIVEPRACTICE....45
CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................................47
References.........................................................................................................................50
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
v
v
List of Figures
Figure1:FMera,2004‐5,BundabergArtsCentre......................................................................................................2Figure2:...stakingclaim,2006,HerveyBayRegionalGallery..............................................................................2
Figure3:FarkasköCaves,Hungary,2011.....................................................................................................................5Figure4:PointLookoutGorge,NorthStradbrokeIsland,2011..........................................................................5
Figure5:LesGrandésDecorations,ClaudeMonet,1920‐26(Monet1920‐26b).........................................8Figure6:LesGrandésDecorations(Monet1920‐26a)............................................................................................8Figure7:VisualinterpretationofJacquesDerrida'sdifférance:adaptedfromMalcolmRichard's
explanation(Richards2008).............................................................................................................................................12Figure8:Therefusaloftime,WilliamKentridge,PerthFestival,2014(Frost2014)..............................13
Figure9:LightPropforanElectricStage(Richards2008,17).........................................................................14
Figure10:Ghostsandactors,Makingthegreenonered(VirtualMacbeth),KereenEly‐Harperand
AndrewBurrell(Burrell2012).........................................................................................................................................16
Figure11:Makingthegreenonered(VirtualMacbeth),KerreenEly‐HarperandAndrewBurrell–
performanceimagetakenbytheauthor,2012.........................................................................................................16
Figure12:ConFIGURINGtheCAVE,JeffreyShaw(Shaw1996).........................................................................19Figure13:Signing:Messagesfromtheancestors,WendyMills,1990(Mills2003,p.42).....................19Figure14:Siteofjudgement,WendyMills,1991(Mills1990)...........................................................................20
Figure15:Triangulatedmethodology,2011..............................................................................................................23Figure16:Triangulatedmethodologyextended,2011..........................................................................................23
Figure17:Zippermethodology,2012............................................................................................................................24Figure18:Visualmodelofresearcher'screativepractice(Bunnell1998)...................................................24
Figure19:HybridArtsResearch–DoubleHelixMethodology(diagram1)©2012..............................26
Figure20:HybridArtsResearch–DoubleHelixMethodology(diagram2)©2012..............................28Figure21:FarkasköCaves,digitalphotographs,2011.........................................................................................29Figure22:StradbrokeIslandcaves,digitalphotographs,2012........................................................................29
Figure23:Handcraftedworks–animateddigitalpendrawings,reliefprint,mixedmediacanvas
(detail),2011–12...................................................................................................................................................................30Figure24:Journalextract–Liminalspaces1visualplan–2012....................................................................31
Figure25:Liminalspaces1,installationstill(blackvoile,projectedanimation,canvas),TheBlock
QUT2012....................................................................................................................................................................................32Figure26:Liminalspaces1,installationstills(blackvoile,projectedanimation,canvas,UVlight,
UVsensitiveink),TheBlock,QUT2012.........................................................................................................................32
Figure27:Liminalspaces1/fire,installationstill(canvas,texturepaste,projectedanimations),
TheBlockQUT2012...............................................................................................................................................................33Figure28:Liminalspaces1,installationstill,(blackvoile,projectedanimation,canvas),TheBlock
QUT2012....................................................................................................................................................................................34
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
vi
vi
Figure29:Detailedplanofexhibitionspace–Liminalspaces:escapingtheframe,May2013.........35Figure30:Journalextract–exhibitiondevelopmentplan,May2013...........................................................36
Figure31:'BabyBlock'scalemodel(1cm:333cm),April2013......3732:Installationtests–Polythene
filmpanels,eachpanel6mx2m,May...........................................................................................................................37
Figure33Connexion:space/place/time,environmentalvideoprojection,collaborationwith
CatherineSchoch,June2013(Viola1990,450)........................................................................................................38
Figure34:Connexion:space/place/time,environmentalvideoprojection,collaborationwith
CatherineSchoch,June2013(Zuber2013)................................................................................................................38Figure35:virtuallythere...1&2,mixedmediaoncanvas,2013.....................................................................39
Figure36:memory...(left):realisation...(right),mixedmediaoncanvas,2012.......................................40
Figure37:merge...,synchroniseddigitalimageanimations,2013..................................................................41
Figure38:Liminalspaces:escapingtheframe,installationstill(hybridphotographs/animated
drawings),2013......................................................................................................................................................................42
Figure39:Liminalspaces:escapingtheframe,installationstill,2013.........................................................43
Figure40:Liminalspaces:escapingtheframe,installationstill,2013.........................................................44Figure41:Liminalspaces:escapingtheframe,installationstill,2013.........................................................45Figure42:HybridArtsPractice–DoubleHelixMethodology(diagram3)–applicationtohybrid
mediavisualartpracticeledresearch,©2012........................................................................................................46
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
vii
vii
Statement of Original Authorship
The work contained in this exegesis has not been previously submitted
to meet requirements for an award at this or any other higher education
institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the exegesis contains no
material previously published or written by another person except where due
reference is made.
Signature: QUT Verified Signature
Date: 7 March 2014
Beyond actuality: locating an authentic hybridity between heterogeneous media in an installation art practice
viii
viii
Acknowledgements
The MA has been a deeply rewarding journey for me made so much more
enjoyable by the support of many individuals and organisations.
It is with much gratitude that I acknowledge the support of my supervisors, Dr
Victoria Garnons-Williams (Principal) and Chris Denaro (Associate). Victoria
Garnons-Williams gave invaluable critique, supportively demanding a self-
critical awareness and providing editorial support. Chris Denaro’s contribution
kept the project focused, with valuable advice offered in the formulation of the
animation development.
For allowing me to present my creative work in The Block, I thank the QUT
Creative Industries Precinct staff. Their support of the project was highly
valued and provided the perfect stage for the work. The Queensland
Academy for Creative Industries must also be acknowledged for their
assistance.
I would also like to thank fellow MA candidate, Catherine Schoch as she
provided tireless networking support, ever willing to participate in peer-to-
peer critique and conversation.
For his ever-forgiving willingness to offer critical, technical and emotional
support, I thank my partner, Perry Hobdell. His creative problem solving and
unconditional encouragement has been integral to the successful outcome of
my research. Thank you.
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
Chapter 1: Introduction
“Painted images hang on walls or rest in storage; bringing them into view is a material handling. Digital pictures reside immaterially inside the computer, and the computer screen functions like a window through which the viewer chooses what he wants to look at.” (Shaw 1993, para.2)
The rationale for this research was based around an awareness as an established
visual artist that existing art practice appeared to frequently make clear distinctions
between actual art object and digital manifestations, both in creation and display of
works. This was most recently experienced at the 2014 Venice Biennale. While
physical art objects and computer-generated images were often juxtaposed in an
exhibition space, a genuine merger of the two appeared more difficult to locate.
Therefore at the heart of the study were ways to effectively combine physical and
digital media, where neither one assumes hierarchical dominance. Emerging from
such a consideration is the research question:
How can heterogeneous forms be combined to achieve an authentic hybridity of the physical and temporal?
In order to answer this question, it was identified that an understanding of actual and
virtual media forms, as well as mixed reality environments and ways to achieve
them were essential.
This exegesis begins with a brief background to the research and the developed
context in which it is positioned; initial assumptions and limitations are then
presented with a brief overview of the methodological approach that evolved. Key
referents including Wendy Mills and Jeffrey Shaw are presented within a contextual
review to introduce informing concepts, influential artworks and how each related to
this research.
A key section is dedicated to the research design. A new framework for arts practice
was developed and tested throughout the study. Specifically applied to hybrid media
praxis, the methodology is presented in three parts to reflect the evolution of the
study. Demonstration of findings of the practice led creative research over a two and
a half year period describes how the conceptualisation, development and public
display of a number of iterations of the creative work both offered solutions and
posed further questions.
Chapter 1: Introduction 2
In conclusion, suggestions for future hybrid media investigation are offered with
further ongoing challenges for hybrid authenticity raised.
BACKGROUND
My research drew upon how physical art objects and immaterial elements, both
essential to my early practice, have been developed and ultimately positioned in the
exhibited work.
Figure 1: FMera, 2004-5, Bundaberg Arts Centre
Figure 2: ...staking claim, 2006, Hervey Bay Regional Gallery
An ongoing push-pull relationship between the physical and digital was evident in
the development, production, exhibition and documentation of my earlier work.
Various strategies were identified, including placement of mixed media 2D work
beside light-projected imagery; blending of sculptural elements with video
projections and reflections; light projected through transparent surfaces; and screen-
progressed interactivity (Figure 1 and 2).
Inspiration at that time was taken for these earlier works from formative new media
artist, Jeffrey Shaw who stated,
Chapter 1: Introduction 3
“...recently developed digital imaging technologies offer the artist new methods and new paradigms which extend the spatial identity of the artwork” (Shaw 1993, para.1).
Shaw presented a challenge to consider the digital image as not trapped behind a
screen, but as a spatial element to be entered in a physical sense; he asked us to
imagine “the state of (the object)...and the possibility, the virtuality which goes
beyond it.” (Deleuze 1986, 112).
SIGNIFICANCE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW
The research was initially undertaken upon the following definitions of key terms,
informed by early examination into the nature of actuality and virtuality. Physical,
material art objects are referred to as actual art. Virtual art is primarily considered to
be digital but can also include ephemeral states of being such as those created with
light. It is recognised that there is an interdependence of the actual and the virtual;
one does not exist without the other – a state of actuality would not exist if the
opposite were not true. When actual and virtual are combined without dominance, a
state of liminality is reached and an authenticity, a validity of hybrid media forms is
achieved. It is understood that interactive elements of the generative work play a
significant role in revealing its potentiality.
As the study unfolded, it was realised that in order to better understand the nature of
authenticity in reference to hybrid forms, a survey of existing ideas of mixed realities
and immersive installation environments was important. Writings by mixed reality
theorist, Steve Benford, were beneficial in the “consideration of relationships
between real and virtual spaces” (Benford et al. 1998). An investigation into related
case studies significantly informed the direction of the studio practice and its
theoretical underpinnings.
The studio practice, identified as the best signifier of authenticity as it delivered
concrete evidence, shifted between physical and non-physical materials, techniques
and processes. In doing so, artworks explored and exploited both haptic and
simulated properties of physical and temporal media forms in an attempt to locate a
legitimate merging of the two. At various levels of the research a continuous shift
and overlap between hand-rendered and digital approaches was apparent. The
resulting works were considered intertextual and were treated phenomenologically,
as each one informed the next through connections in concept, imagery, media or
technique. Each work was derivative of direct experience in the sense that a strong
Chapter 1: Introduction 4
link to place and memory formed the foundation of the artwork, yet revealed a fresh
ontology for it by presenting a renewed perspective.
In development of the artwork deliberate decisions were made to consider ways to
extend actual art objects to embody transience. Digital technologies were utilised
but the practice also considered ephemeral qualities of light, shadow and reflection
as virtual (re)presentation. Deliberate media choices were made to establish a
“postmedia praxis” by using any media necessary to effectively realise the intent of
the work, and in doing so, work towards a genuine “hybrid(ity) in approach, method,
content and form” (Graham and Cook 2010, 5 and 34).
The methodology for the study was derived from a starting model of triangulation,
where actual, virtual and hybrid aspects of the work formed the three points. As the
research evolved, the methodology was seen instead to be a relational, or sliding
system that considered non-hierarchical and dual perspectives (actual and virtual) to
arrive at a third (hybrid) with flexible variants. A new model, which is elaborated on
in the research design chapter, was developed to configure such flexible variants,
diagrammatically presented as a double helix framework.
CONTEXT AND APPROACH TO RESEARCH
Starting parameters for this research included Machinima and virtual worlds after a
long running investigation into their potential as art media. In the early stages of
research, however, both were abandoned. Despite successfully embedding my
drawings into virtual spaces and synchronous, collaborative development of ‘in-
world’ works, the experience became increasingly removed from the qualities of the
physical object and the power to connect on an emotional level.
A more veritable context evolved from everyday observation. Links between the
actual and virtual became informed by an early experiential response to two cave
environments, one in the Northern Hemisphere (Farkaskö Caves, Hungary) and the
other in the Southern Hemisphere (Point Lookout Gorge, Stradbroke Island,
Australia).
Underlying the research was the key concept of duality, arrived at through a
framework of a parallax view – two perceptions of the ‘cave’ experience – and an
identified relationship to actuality and virtuality. Opposing experiences at the two
locations presented juxtaposed views – a haptic, almost spiritual connection in the
Hungarian caves against a sense of disconnected observation at Stradbroke. In
Hungary, the Farkaskö caves (Figure 3) elicited a highly emotive response.
Chapter 1: Introduction 5
Immersed in the cave spaces, any concern for the exterior was immediately lost.
Physically embedded in the aesthetically captivating cave environment, the contours
and actual textures of the carved, white tuff stone surfaces and relationships
between the internal structures and networked spaces were all encompassing. In
contrast, while surrounded by the textured, darkened spaces of the Point Lookout
caves interest in the cave itself was overshadowed by the seemingly flattened,
screen-like view beyond the cave of the roaring ocean gorge, the vibrant blue sky
and colourful cliffs opposite the space itself (Figure 4). The space of the cave
became merely a vehicle for the disembodied viewing of what lay beyond its
boundary.
Figure 3: Farkaskö Caves, Hungary, 2011
Figure 4: Point Lookout Gorge, North Stradbroke Island, 2011
A correlation to physical experiences of actuality (Farkaskö) and mediated
inferences of virtuality (Point Lookout) was identified through a strong awareness of
the alternate responses, which then formed the visual basis of the subsequent body
of work and informed the investigation of its hybrid potential.
Possibilities for an altered perspective attained through combinations of the two,
referring to Plato’s Simile of the Cave and The Divided Line (Plato.,Lee and Lane
2007 235-248), aspired to a ‘hybrid authority’ in the work – an authentic hybrid
practice – sought through contemporaneous exhibition of physical art objects and
Chapter 1: Introduction 6
digital representations to establish ambiguous relationships between the actual and
virtual within a co-relative structure. By considering implications of the idea of a
“virtual window” (Friedberg 2006), notions of the physical frame, the screen and
ways to escape each were investigated.
An ongoing contextual review of arts practice and related literature was undertaken
that is more fully outlined in the following chapter. Key authors - Oliver Grau, Frank
Popper, Jean Baudrillard, Gillies Deleuze, Pierre Lévy and ‘postmodern Platos’
(Zuckert 1996) including Jacques Derrida - have progressively informed the
research. Jeffrey Shaw’s Configuring the Cave, together with Kerreen Ely-Harper
and Andrew Burrell’s Virtual Macbeth, which explore immersive or dialectical
mediated experience, have provided distinctive influential works. The large scale,
hanging panel projection artworks of Wendy Mills’ Signing: Messages from the
ancestors and Site of Judgement have also offered significant influence and points
of departure for my own work.
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 7
Chapter 2: Contextual Review
Seeking an understanding of the terms actual and virtual has been central to
contextual investigations. Many theories of actual and virtual art have been
proposed. To establish a critical context for the research, key theoretical findings
and significant artworks that informed, questioned and affirmed directions for the
work will be outlined. Oliver Grau’s writings on virtual art offer historical insights into
contemporary virtual forms. When coupled with ideas of Jean Baudrillard and Frank
Popper, Grau’s theories introduce a continuum of virtuality and an understanding of
the processual and transformational nature of virtual art. Nicolas Bourriard’s notions
of post-production offer further insight into creative process, introducing the concept
of potentiality.
Referring to the mixed reality models described by Steve Benford (et al) has been
critical in the identification of relationships between physical and synthetic elements
of mixed reality spaces. Positioning material and immaterial spaces as “direct
extensions of one another” creates the potential to “provide a window between the
two” – a mixed reality boundary (Benford et al. 1998, 209). Benford “extend(s) the
boundary concept by considering how multiple physical and synthetic spaces might
be linked together through the use of multiple boundaries in order to create a
structured mixed reality (Benford et al. 1998, 216)
Tim Barker’s exploration of mixed realities and emergent space became a further
conduit from theory to practice. Within a post-modernist framework of new media
art, an investigation into ideas of intertextuality, simulation and mixed realities
helped to define the parameters of the study. Offering diverse approaches, Jeffrey
Shaw’s early new media work, alongside iterations of Kerreen Ely-Harper and
Andrew Burrell’s Virtual Macbeth, presented poignant catalysts for reflection on
connections between space and image, the role of interactivity and possibilities for
the blurring of boundaries between physical and digital forms.
The work of Wendy Mills was a key referent as, in the mentioned works, she sought
immersive experiences through installations that combined physical objects with
video projections and interactive elements – all key components of my own work.
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 8
THEORETICAL PRECURSORS – ACTUAL AND VIRTUAL ART
Grau and Baudrillard: actual art, virtual art and the ‘real’
In his seminal book of 2003, Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion, Oliver Grau
refers to historical works, positioning these as antecedents to contemporary
concepts of virtual representation. New media art practice is presented with
poignant connections to actualities of art history not previously apparent.
Grau states that the evolution of the ‘panorama’ in painting can be seen as a
precursor to contemporary understanding of immersion and illusionistic space.
Reference to works such as Claude Monet’s water lily canvases, arranged in circular
formations surrounding the viewer, positions these as milestones for future ideas of
immersive interactivity and illusionary perception.
Monet unquestionably created an "illusion of a single continuous canvas" with
associations of being “immers[ed] in the image space” through “locating observers
within the watery scene” (Grau 2003, 141-142)
Figure 5: Les Grandés Decorations, Claude Monet, 1920-26 (Monet 1920-26b)
Figure 6: Les Grandés Decorations (Monet 1920-26a)
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 9
Other historical references to "immersive strategies of the classical world" include
biblical depictions, Baroque ceilings and illusionistic landscapes such as Robert
Barker's 18th century circular canvases employing his process of “la nature a coup
d’oeil” (Grau 2003, 56). Appearances of panoramic deceptions appear to have set
the stage for new levels of audience involvement with artworks, taking the viewer
beyond the role of passive observer, no longer merely standing in front of the flat
work but being surrounded by it to achieve a sense of inclusion. Receipt of a
renewed perception of painting as a participatory device slowly emerged.
Referring to Baudrillard’s theory of simulacra, Grau establishes interactive media as
responsible for altering our idea of the historical image. ‘New’ mergers between the
natural world and artificiality create “mixed realities”, blurring boundaries between
original forms and simulations or representations of them. Grau suggests issues of
ownership, where situations of interactivity and virtuality raise uncertainty of agency
and distinction between author and observer. Apparent questioning of authenticity or
ownership by Grau furthers a discussion of the postmodernist idea of the third order
simulacra – simulation posed by Baudrillard in his 1983 book, Simulations.
Introducing the notion of the “lost object” Baudrillard establishes the state of the
“hyperreal” through a “menacing” of the real. He states, “the unreal...is that of
hallucinatory resemblance of the real with itself” (Baudrillard 1983, 142). Baudrillard
defines the real as “that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction”
and continues to define the hyperreal by stating, “the real is not only what can be
reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced”. (Baudrillard 1983, 146).
An interesting perspective is presented by a definition of the hyperreal, as it negates
the concept of actuality (the real) being associated with object alone. Acts of
imitation, adaptation or simulation are positioned as the production of new
constructed realities. The actual and the virtual therefore hold the same status within
the real. Baudrillard’s assertions pose interesting implications for hybrid media art
practice. Actual object and virtual simulation both achieve an authenticity as real,
potentially blurring boundaries between them through immersive experience.
Grau discusses the ontological nature of virtual art as contrary to notions of ‘giving
an idea an existential form’. Posing definitions of rapidly ‘changing ephemeral image
spaces’, he refers to virtual works as “processual... stress[ing] their unfinished or
open quality and locat[ing] art within a framework of communicative social relations”
(Grau 2003, 206-207). He advocates that a “diminishing critical distance and
increasing emotional involvement” (Grau 2003, 13) are characteristic of the
immersive art experience.
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 10
On consideration of Grau’s reflections, immersive artworks have the potential to
connect with an audience on a deeper level than older, historical mediums such as
traditional, flat painting. Therefore, essential to the mixed reality artwork’s ability to
fully connect with its viewer on an emotional level, is the need to minimise if not
remove entirely, the divide between observer and observed. Coupled with a
severing of any perceived boundary between the actual and virtual, a truly hybrid
experience seems possible.
Popper: recontextualisation and blurred boundaries
Art and technology historian, Frank Popper, in a 2004 interview with Joseph
Nechvatal, asked us to consider differences between the historical and
contemporary value of virtual artwork. Popper refers to virtual art as “being in the
presence of not only reality itself but also of the simulation of reality” as he
articulates an “aesthetic-technological logic of creation” specific to virtual works
(Popper and Nechvatal 2004, 67). Positioning emphasis on the process of creation
and open-endedness of virtual artworks, Popper suggests that if the work is deemed
successful, the aesthetic intention of the artist is not lost in the technology.
Epistemologically, Popper claims that virtual art holds many truths and “possibilities”
of actual art, making it an “all-embracing area”. Ontologically, he sets virtual art
apart from technological art, stating “virtual art...can be realised from many different
actualities“ (Popper and Nechvatal 2004, 69). Therefore, as initially assumed, virtual
art is not related entirely to digital media; technology can be seen as only one agent
of a newly constructed reality in a hybrid work.
Blurred lines between the actual and the virtual are evident. In his 2007 book, From
Technological to Virtual Art, Popper discusses the power of virtual works to immerse
the body and senses of participants in a simulated world. Considering virtual art as a
“point of departure” Popper claims that “what is new in virtualism is precisely its
virtuality, its potentiality, and above all its openness” (Popper 2007, 4). Like Grau,
Popper refers to historical pioneers of virtuality, recognising their importance in
establishing links between aesthetic attributes and virtual art as innovative,
interactive and multi-sensorial. To further thinking about the immersive possibilities
of virtual art, Anne Ellgood points out:
“...the real and the virtual interpenetrate to such a degree that we have witnessed a profound cultural shift, permanently altering the way we experience and represent space, the viewing of multiple perspectives simultaneously...the breakdown of physical boundaries and temporalities” (Stiles and Selz 1996, 30).
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 11
The potentiality of the virtual as an integral element of a constructed reality becomes
clear. Ultimately, Popper moves beyond Grau’s definitions of virtuality to propose
“the computer has transformed the image and… that it is (now) possible to enter it”.
He suggests an “aesthetic of transparence and fluidity” (Popper and Nechvatal
2004, 72-73), an observation which informs my own practice as it supports notions
of potentiality, mixed realities and hybrid practices.
Whitehead, Bourriard and Derrida: The Potentiality of Hybrid Practice
In 1979, A. N. Whitehead introduced the terms “actual entity” and “giveness” in his
book Process and Reality. Whitehead referred to two levels of meaning and reality;
first the “formal structure of actual entities” and second the “giveness of the world in
which the actual entities occur”, defining “actual entity” as “the decision among
potentiality” and “giveness” as “the definiteness of actuality, which both excludes
and includes potentiality” (Whitehead 1979, 44). The process of one actuality
becoming another, through decisions made, in turn raises ontological principles of
progressive decision-making, hence informing the creative process. The original
actuality is surpassed; Whitehead refers to the “satisfaction of the actual [final]
entity” (Whitehead 1979, 44).
Original actuality has also been surpassed technologically since Whitehead’s
claims. In 2005, Nicolas Bourriaud, French curator and art critic, authored a defining
text, Postproduction: Culture as Screenplay: How Art Reprograms the World.
Reflecting on the late twentieth century, Bourriaud points out that many works have
been created through interpretation, reproduction, re-exhibition or use of existing
works, linking this to global culture and the advent of the information age. He likens
nineties art practice to a “flea-market approach” where artists assembled found
elements into new forms, “reedit[ing] historical or ideological narratives, inserting the
elements that compose them into alternative scenarios” (Bourriaud 2005, 45).
Theories of intertextuality and intermediality emerged as artists utilised and
accessed ‘multiple media technology sources’. Processes of cross-mediation and
the remix of pre-existing materials create a rich and ongoing cultural dialogue (Irvine
2011, 3), a concept that is critical to this research. Physical art object and digitally
captured imagery are recognised as starting points for ongoing re-contextualisation.
Derrida’s notion of différence adds a deeper understanding of hybridity and the
potential role of the audience in a mixed reality work. Derived from the French verb,
‘differer’ (to differ or to defer), implications of temporal experience and relational
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 12
constructs can be located in the term itself (Richards 2008, 17), represented in
Figure 7.
Figure 7: Visual interpretation of Jacques Derrida's différance: adapted from Malcolm Richard's explanation (Richards 2008)
Together, outwardly encountered artwork (actual) and internal constructs (virtual)
impact on audience experience, acting as binary opposites initially separated in time
and space. However, their colliding relationship, their hybridity, creates new
meaning. Ideas of multiple and possibly conflicting interpretations are suggested,
with the meaning of a work changing over time through interaction and resulting in a
mediated, visual experience.
In 1998, Bourriaud, in consideration of art practice in Relational Aesthetics, referred
to the contemporary artwork as a ‘social interstice’. Audience encounter was
described as one of “perception, comment and evol(ution) in a unique space and
time” (Bourriaud 2002, 16). Experienced as a place of encounter, diverse elements
of an installation work were “recognized as relational and therefore connected”
(Bourriaud 2002, 20). As a space of ‘co-existence’, connections are made between
the artwork itself and the audience, prompting a dialogic interchange and thereby
furthering the potentiality of the work.
Bourriaud advanced this discussion with consideration of the nature of technology in
contemporary work of the time. Still relevant today, he claimed that the
contemporary image became ‘active’ rather than ‘retroactive’, presenting a powerful
redefinition of the role of an image (Bourriaud 2002, 70). A “criterion of co-existence”
was defined by Bourriaud as a “transposition into experience of spaces constructed
and represented by the artist, the projection of the symbolic into the real” (Bourriaud
2002, 82).
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 13
Many artists have worked in immersive spaces – Merce Cunningham and Robert
Rauschenberg, William Kentridge and George Poonkhin Khut have all surrounded
the audience to make connections through the shared space of the work. When
considering the work of each, it is apparent that the installation space, if the artist
aims for it to be immersive, must invite the viewer into the work, combining often-
disparate elements to successfully engage an audience in the conversation of the
work.
Figure 8: The refusal of time, William Kentridge, Perth Festival, 2014 (Frost 2014)
Kentridge’s video installation The refusal of time (Figure 8) features five large
screens on three sides of the rectangular space. In an interview with art critic,
Andrew Frost, Kentridge claims that the installation is “an invitation to the visitor to
see if they can find points of connection that overlap between their memory, their
experiences and desires, and what they see on the screen and hear”. Reminiscent
of Monet’s canvases and “tak(ing)... its cues from investigations into relativity”, the
work becomes a panoramic “collage of ideas and references, music, animation and
sculpture...” (Frost 2014).
Therefore for my own work, through insertion of devices such as audience activated
surveillance video into the immersive space, the viewer can not only be invited into
the space of the work, but also complement and become a part of it; relations
between the art and the viewer can be heightened and agencies potentially
transferred.
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 14
INFLUENTIAL PRECEDENTS AND MIXED REALITIES
Experimentation with light by Bauhaus artist, László Moholy-Nagy, in works such as
Light Prop for an Electric Stage in the 1920s, have Informed my own considerations
of the virtual. The work locates connections between “the plastic arts and cinema”
with the “movement of light and shade projected on the walls and ceiling. The power
of the work… depends more on the reflection than on the original material” (Moholy-
Nagy 1923–1930).
Figure 9: Light Prop for an Electric Stage (Richards 2008, 17)
To further thinking about the immersive possibilities of virtual art, Anne Ellgood
states:
“...the real and the virtual interpenetrate to such a degree that we have witnessed a profound cultural shift, permanently altering the way we experience and represent space, the viewing of multiple perspectives simultaneously...the breakdown of physical boundaries and temporalities” (Popper 2007, 16).
The potentiality of the virtual as an integral element of a constructed reality becomes
clear. Extending combinations of actual and virtual entities through audience
participation in the hybrid artwork, and thereby the processual creation of virtuality,
places the audience in a subjective position, connected through personally
emotional and empirical perspectives. As co-producer of the work, the viewer
participates in decision-making that results in a new and ever-changing actuality.
With each new participant entering the space of the work, previous actualities and
feelings become new as decisions are made and the work continues to change. An
acceptance of this viral nature of the work embraces the altered value of the hybrid
mixed reality work.
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 15
For Gillies Deleuze (1994, 208) and, more recently, Pierre Lévy, the actual and the
virtual are equally real. The four states of being, according to Deleuze, are the real,
actual, virtual and possible. He states that actual and virtual are not opposites as
often misunderstood, but merely different ways of being. Lévy defines the virtual as
“the knot of tendencies or forces that accompanies a situation, event, object, or
entity, and which invokes a process of resolution: actualization”. In so doing, Lévy
establishes that the virtual is just another “mode of being (like the real) that expands
the process of creation, opens up the future, (and) injects a core of meaning
beneath the platitude of immediate physical presence” (Lévy 1998, 16). Lévy places
actual alongside real, virtual with possible, as a perceptual translation but with an
actual mode of being in its own respect. Therefore, the definition of virtual can now
be extended as a field of potentialities directed by perception and interaction,
signalling clear implications for my own practice.
No longer can actual and virtual be considered as discrete opposites but rather as
complementary, combining in such a way as to enhance or emphasize the qualities
of each other to arrive at another state of being – a third state – hybridity
.
Making the green one red (Virtual Macbeth) – Kerreen Ely-Harper and
Andrew Burrell
Making the Green One Red (Virtual Macbeth) was presented at The Block, QUT by
theatre director, Kerreen Ely-Harper in 2012, in collaboration with new media artist,
Andrew Burrell as a final iteration of an evolving, creative work. An earlier
performance work staged at the Loft and directly feeding into the culminating work
will also be referred to.
Burrell claimed presentation of “a mixed reality artwork and performance for a real
and virtual audience with live actors in a physical space and virtual actors in a virtual
space” (Stiles and Selz 1996, 30). He added that Virtual Macbeth used “multiple
layers of interaction [to] bring the audience into a world woven by the Witches of the
Macbeth narrative, a world full of reflections, mirages and doubles”.
Proposing a mixed reality experience, Harper and Burrell did indeed present diverse
elements of video, sound, sculptural objects and a participatory environment with
some audience interaction. However, in presenting the “live actors in a physical
space and virtual actors in a virtual space”, an authentic “third space” (Burrell
2012a), assuming that this was intended as a state of hybridity, was not convincingly
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 16
achieved. “Their aim was to highlight the screen as site of intersection between
the virtual and the physical, where body and text, self and narrative, imagined
and remembered all begin to merge (Burrell 2012b).” Instead, it is suggested
that the screen mostly acted as a barrier, a boundary, between audience, actors
and the work (Figure 11).
Figure 10: Ghosts and actors, Making the green one red (Virtual Macbeth), Kereen Ely-Harper and Andrew Burrell (Burrell 2012)
Figure 11: Making the green one red (Virtual Macbeth), Kerreen Ely-Harper and Andrew Burrell – performance image taken by the author, 2012
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 17
If coexistence is the key element of a mixed reality work, then the artists have
indeed succeeded in both iterations – they successfully combined live performance
and digital projection of virtual performers in virtual spaces. The work did offer some
authentic merging of the two through techniques of shadow performance and sound
interactivity. However, new media theorist, Tim Barker, defines a mixed reality work
as one that brings together a user and digital software in the creation of a digital
aesthetic. It is the merging, or coexistence, of the physical and digital processes that
creates environments with aesthetic quality (Burrell 2012a). Using Barker’s
definition, coexistence seemed more apparent in Virtual Macbeth, placing
uncertainty over the artists’ claim of a mixed reality, interactive experience.
Making the Green One Red (second iteration) again saw unbridged gaps between
audience and performance, actual and virtual. Figure 10 shows a merger between
live performer and virtual counterpart. However, as this is a manipulated image for
promotion, it is not a true record of the performance itself. Indicators of an actual
performance, as seen in Figure 11, again largely position performers in front of the
screen and the audience in front of the actors. It is acknowledged that crossovers
between visual and performing arts were inherent to the project, resulting in a
theatrical aesthetic. However, a passive relationship was often experienced between
human participant, performer, actual object and digital space.
Similarly, issues of establishing social interactions between real and virtual spaces
in mixed reality works are addressed in the paper; Understanding and constructing
shared spaces with mixed reality boundaries by Benford et al. Techniques of
establishing mixed reality boundaries as a way of joining real and virtual spaces are
introduced. In order to arrive at genuine immersion, users must perceive that they
are present in a new space. It is acknowledged that degrees of immersion exist,
dependent on conditions such as ability to see one’s own virtual image and to walk
through a space in order to encounter it (Benford et al. 1998, 191).
In the case of Virtual Macbeth, the inhabitants of the physical space encountered
the synthetic spaces as an extension of their physical environment. For my own
installation, a genuine merging of the two was sought to move past a mix of realities
and into a genuine immersive experience.
ConFIGURING the CAVE – Jeffrey Shaw
Although relatively early in context of this study, in 1996, Australian media artist,
Jeffrey Shaw, presented an important mixed reality work titled ConFIGURING the
CAVE. Interested in modalities of interactivity, virtual reality and hypermedia, Shaw
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 18
created the multi-sensorial work, which he classified as a “computergraphic
installation” (Barker 2009, 22).
Full projections filled three walls and the floor, virtually surrounding the participatory
audience member, and reminiscent of the early immersive experience of Monet’s
panoramic canvases. Taking this idea much further however, Shaw positioned the
audience as manipulator of projected images in real time. Taking on a role of
puppeteer, they moved a near life-sized artist mannequin in the centre of the space,
thereby ‘controlling’ the imagery around them.
Particular movements of the puppet generated individual modulated responses of
visual image and sound, transitioning between preset ‘pictorial domains’ (Shaw
1996). However, with each new audience member positioned as manipulator of the
processual work, every enactment affected a unique combination of image and
sound to become the hybrid environment of the work.
If we reflect on Whitehead’s idea of one actuality becoming another, Shaw is
providing a means of decision-making for the participant to uncover the potentiality
of the artwork. The puppeteer generates an ever-changing actuality through
manipulation of the virtual environment, directly affecting the aesthetics of the
space. The processual nature of the work informs another significant consideration
for my own work.
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 19
Figure 12: ConFIGURING the CAVE, Jeffrey Shaw (Shaw 1996)
Signing: messages from the ancestors | Site of Judgement – Wendy
Mills
The work of Wendy Mills became highly influential through her use of large scaled,
clear, plastic film and black mesh as interactive projection surfaces. In a dark space
the ‘screen’ becomes almost imperceptible, presenting an invisible surface to
receive the ghost-like images projected onto it.
Timothy Morrell posits that Mills’ work addresses multiple realities through “parallel
forms of existence”; the figure is “both an image of light – a part of the unseen world
and of flesh – … our physical world.” (Shaw 1996)
Mills has had a long interest in religious architecture and its ability to transform
space and experience. A 2012 interview with the artist revealed that her exploration
into Buddhist philosophy, furthered by a visit to Buddhist caves and grottos in China,
informed her interest in the manipulation of space and its ability to affect perception.
When considering the virtual, Mills refers to the transparent properties of her
polythene film panels in Signing: Messages from the ancestors as a
dematerialization of the art object. In her words… “It’s here but it’s not here”. Mills’
interest in the ephemeral and the permanent offers parallels to my own work.
Figure 13: Signing: Messages from the ancestors, Wendy Mills, 1990 (Mills 2003, p. 42)
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 20
Figure 14: Site of judgement, Wendy Mills, 1991 (Mills 1990)
Seeking a sense of immersion, Site of Judgement confronts the audience with a
pitch-black space and an image of a single wireframe chair projected onto an
invisible, black, suspended shadecloth panel. Upon entering the space, motion
sensors activate other projections to surround the viewer, remaining on for only two
minutes before returning to darkness.
Mixed reality works involving groups, interactivity and a shared boundary present
problems of shareability (Benford et al. 1998, 208). If one boundary in Mills’ work is
considered to be the entry to the space and another the ‘screen’, a group of people
standing in front of it can meaningfully interact as the projected images are driven by
audience proximity and motion sensor devices. This would allow a group of people
to move around in front of the work and meaningfully interact, eliminating the
previously mentioned effect where only “one participant controlling the (work) and
others are reduced to passive passenger” (Benford et al. 1998, 208).
SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
In consideration of my previous work, audiences have either been immersed into the
physical space of the work or situated at a distance as passive observer. Haptic
qualities of the actual images were juxtaposed with the incorporeality of their digital
counterparts, forcing a degree of embodied encounter with the collection of work as
a whole. This research project sought to authentically extend integration and
immersion. The aforementioned influential works, with reference to key theoretical
Chapter 2: Contextual Review 21
underpinnings, informed these ambitions for my current work. Ely-Harper and Burrell
with their attempts to bridge the gap between actual and virtual domains, and
Shaw’s demonstration of the interactive, immersive and processual nature of his
mixed reality installations. Together, they contributed to my deliberation of process
and aesthetic challenges of combining actual and virtual.
To accomplish an effective integration, the space of the mixed reality work must be,
as defined by Barker, “emergent” (Mills 1991). To Popper, the emerging work is
evolutionary and fluid. Its actuality is defined by the relationships existing within it.
Representation is just one of a number of considerations rather than the primary
focus, becoming a significant understanding for the potential of my own work as it
developed. To achieve an authentic hybridity, an audience must not only enter or
travel through the space of the work, but also experience an embodied connection
between the physical and immaterial, with no apparent disparity between the two..
The integration of material and simulated elements as an authentic mixed reality
work, where audiences both internalise and externalise a sense of control, can
effectively achieve a legitimate merging of the two.
The works of both Shaw and Mills are critical in locating an authentic hybridity – a
combination of complementary forms to deliver a mixed reality interactive
experience. Positioning of audience as both receiver of actualities or objects and as
co-contributor or manipulator of a changing mixed reality work is essential. Through
interactivity and co-authoring of the virtual environment, I have sought to achieve a
rich immersion in an intertextual, processual experience, aiming for boundaries to be
blurred as the actuality of artworks emerges through devices of intermediality and
interaction.
Chapter 3: Research Design 22
Chapter 3: Research Design
METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH DESIGN
“If a new result is to have any value it must unite elements long since known, but till now scattered and seemingly foreign to each other, and suddenly introduce order where the appearance of disorder reigned” (Barker 2009, 22)
As practice-led research, the interpretive framework and methodology for this study
has been informed by the materiality of the practice and articulation of the project
question:
How can heterogeneous forms be combined to achieve an authentic hybridity of the physical and temporal?
Addressing various combinations of actual and virtual representation, this research
presented hybrid blends of the corporeal and temporal in an exploration of liminal
space and image within an installation setting. The methodology naturally emerging
from the research articulates the strong relationship between critical theory and
artistic practice.
Utilising transitional processes of hybrid imagery, an exploration into how
complementary experiential forms can be converged was undertaken. As visual and
sensory oppositions were repeatedly met, Derrida’s post-Structuralist philosophy of
binary oppositions became a key referent in the conceptual framing of the artworks
and the methodology. It was recognised however that, at all phases of the research,
a degree of slippage between the two was experienced. Initial assumptions about
the differences between actual and virtual images and experiences informed by the
experience of the caves became challenged by the overlap encountered, leading to
the need for a new model to more effectively represent the experience of the
practice.
A diagram to present the new methodology has been developed, offering a fresh
framework for arts practice based on paired structures, fluidity and dynamic
processual relationships.
Chapter 3: Research Design 23
Beyond triangulation
The methodology for the study was derived from the early concept of triangulation,
where actual, virtual and hybrid aspects of the work formed the three points, as
illustrated in the following diagram (Figure 14).
Figure 15: Triangulated methodology, 2011
In the early triangulated model, considering the triangle as a flexible form, the points
were able to shift weight, changing the shape of the triangle and indicative of the
fluid nature of the methods employed. Overlaid on the triangulation model were my
personal experience and memory of the caves, indicating a parallax view and the
perceived relationship between actual and virtual (Figure 16).
However, using hybridity as one of the discrete points of the triangle proved
problematic. Echoing the conceptual underpinninngs, hybridity could not occur
without actuality and virtuality; it could not exist alone but needed to be a genuine
merger of the other parts. The structure needed to reflect the ability of a hybrid state
to shift between actual and virtual.
Figure 16: Triangulated methodology extended, 2011
Chapter 3: Research Design 24
A second model seemed nearer to the mode of practice – a sliding methodology
visualised through a zipper (Figure 17). Still, the inability of the arms of the zipper,
the binaries of actual and virtual, to move vertically or to cross over flexibly, failed to
visualise the continuous slippage experienced between them. To treat actual and
virtual as discrete was not demonstrating the fluidity of the hybrid state, making this
model also redundant.
Figure 17: Zipper methodology, 2012
On consideration of the spiralling model of researcher’s creative practice presented
by Katie Bunnell in 1998 (Figure 18), the ability of the internal and external
influences on the research to overlap, to progress, recede and re-emerge seemed
closer to my own practice.
A triangulated approach was indeed evident in my research, but needed to be fluid
rather than static; boundaries needed to blur to effectively represent the way that
actual and virtual meet and overlap to become hybrid yet remain able to separate
again to their original ontology.
Figure 18: Visual model of researcher's creative practice (Bunnell 1998)
Chapter 3: Research Design 25
Double helix methodology
At this point in my research, the methodology was recognized as supporting a
relativist ontology. As the study was closely informed by the interdependence of
research question, personal experience and critical theory applied to creative
practice it became clear that a relational, or sliding system that considered non-
hierarchical and dual perspectives (actual and virtual) to arrive at a third (hybrid)
with flexible variants was needed. A new model was developed to configure such
flexible variants, diagrammatically presented as a double helix framework, as
demonstrated in Figure 19.
The model represents the fluid nature of actual and virtual conditions encountered.
Through transitional traits of the helix structure, it demonstrates how complementary
experiential forms can converge. The double helix methodology diagram denotes
how hybrid arts research reveals processual relationships between experience,
critical inquiry and artistic practice. Each stage of the research process informs the
next yet remains connected.
Base model
Referring to its scientific origins, the double helix structure has two complementary
regions held together by base pairs (Armstrong 2000, 72). The binding of the pairs
signifies a hybridised blending of the two. Based on a twisted ladder, the geometric
underpinnings of the helix see the successive pairs made less parallel by shifting,
sliding, tilting, rolling, rising and twisting (Drendel 2011). Symbolically representing
an evolutionary approach, complementary regions of the double helix create a
metaphoric and fluid relationship within a paired structure, thereby moving beyond
the rigidly parallel, binary opposites of the zipper model and reflective of the
crossovers encountered within the practice and related research.
The base model (Figure 19) is intended for application to any artistic practice that
seeks to combine the physical and the temporal. It demonstrates the foundations of
the double helix methodology – the overarching DNA of hybrid arts practice.
A dynamic continuum of praxis is signified; a continuum that I attest is a much truer
representation of the methodology employed in authentic hybrid practice than
suggested by previous models.
Chapter 3: Research Design 26
Figure 19: Hybrid Arts Research – Double Helix Methodology (diagram 1) © 2012
Chapter 3: Research Design 27
Throughout the various phases of my research, focus has shifted continuously
between actual and virtual, sometimes discrete, sometimes overlaid, sometimes
folding back on itself, other times moving further apart. Here it can be seen that
critical overlaps and active relationships between research methods and processes
are revealed in this model – actual and virtual combining with a continually shifting
emphasis.
Three phases of the research are clearly indicated – influence, conception and
realisation – each becoming one fluid component of the double helix form. Each
phase is not a discrete element; rather each phase bleeds into the next with no clear
boundaries between them, again reflective of the merging of realities sought
throughout the study. Co-relativity is important, as each part of the diagram is
equally essential to the attainment of an authentic hybridity. Influences on the
research are considered as phenomenological, experiences gained from both
internal (virtual) and external (actual) stimuli, suggesting both emotional and
perceptual considerations as early indicators of influence on such a study. In the
next phase, conception, definitions of actual and virtual are considered, setting the
contextual parameters of the study. Finally, experience and contextualization marry,
resulting in the production of artwork and ontological reflection on creative outcomes
realised from the research.
Base model with addition of key terms
An important aspect of the second phase of the double helix model (Figure 20) is
the appearance of the broad research topic, the authentic combination of
heterogeneous forms, leading to the formulation of a more focused research
question. With the addition of key terminology placed in the spaces between the
base pairs, the model achieves a higher level of reliability.
Including pragmatic and theoretical connections made between actuality and
virtuality, the second diagram takes us closer to an articulation of a specific hybrid
practice led research. Critical theory and a contextual exploration of the nature of
hybridity drive the conceptual framing of the research, identifying an interpretive
epistemology through the introduction of key theoretical concepts of co-relativity,
liminality and temporality. The creative outcomes of reflective praxis, immersive
processes together with actual and virtual media investigation, indication the
generation of multiple constructed realities in the realisation of hybrid art forms.
It is proposed that the strength of the double helix model is its ability to seamlessly
weave together theory, concept and creative outcomes. Methods and processes
Chapter 3: Research Design 28
employed by the individual researcher to achieve an authentic hybridity are entirely
dependent on the demands and needs of the specific project undertaken. A third
model, one which extends the first and second diagrams with the addition of binaries
to connect the actual and virtual strands of the helix, will be presented in the creative
outcomes chapter to follow.
Figure 20: Hybrid Arts Research – Double Helix Methodology (diagram 2) © 2012
Chapter 3: Research Design 29
METHODS
Throughout the study, the studio practice wavered between actual and virtual
materials, techniques and processes, exploring and exploiting both haptic and
simulated properties of each in an attempt to locate a legitimate merging of the two.
At various levels of the research, including site investigation, production of artworks
and documenting of working processes, a continuous shift between hand and digital
approaches – physical and temporal – was apparent.
Figure 21: Farkaskö Caves, digital photographs, 2011
Photographs, videos and hand drawings were used to record responses to the two
cave sites. A wide variety of art making methods was accessed including: mixed
media drawings, relief and monotype prints, mixed media paintings and digital
image techniques such as animation of hand rendered drawings captured with a
digital pen, overlays of dissolving photographs and animation of iPad drawings. Pen
drawings and video or light projection onto plastics and other surfaces were
investigated, including transient effects made by exploiting UV sensitive paints.
Figure 22: Stradbroke Island caves, digital photographs, 2012
Chapter 3: Research Design 30
Figure 23: Hand crafted works – animated digital pen drawings, relief print, mixed media
canvas (detail), 2011 – 12
Documentation of contextual investigations and working processes vacillated
between hand-drawn journals and an online blog, photographs and video
recordings. Neither actual nor virtual media forms, as they were considered in earlier
stages of practice, took precedence. As the studio work developed however,
possible limitations of hybridity based on media related definitions alone were
considered.
PROCESSES
In applying various working methods to the theoretical and conceptual
underpinnings of the research, it became apparent that the originally assumed
definitions of actual and virtual were becoming challenged as processes of practice
were reflected upon.
Actual drawings, paintings and prints were extended beyond objective
representations of the physical object to consider abstractions as virtual – drawn
from memory and visualisations of experience. Virtuality could also be considered
as an indexical reference to the real. A new actuality could be achieved through
virtual media representations of photographic imagery, thereby rethinking iconic
images as giving authenticity to mediated depictions of them. Audience immersion in
a processual space forced consideration of audience agency as well as media in the
attainment of states of hybridity. Liminal space became indicative of thresholds of
experience as well as integrated combinations of media.
Challenges to early assumptions of the research are discussed further in the
following chapter where the creative outcomes of the project are presented and the
double helix methodology applied.
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes 31
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
...”black becomes a bright light on a dark day”... (Drendel 2011)
ITERATIONS
Three iterations of elements of the research project were presented for peer or
public review. A detailed outline and analysis of each follows. Significant
development opportunities contributed to the extensive planning for the final
exhibition, including meetings with QUT technical and curatorial staff and two days
of development time in The Block space in May 2013. Immediately prior to the
installation of the final exhibition, a residency at Point Lookout, Stradbroke Island
allowed for positioning of elements of the work back into the environment from which
it partly emerged.
Liminal spaces 1
31 October - 2 November 2012 – Ingite!12 conference, The Block, QUT
Figure 24: Journal extract – Liminal spaces 1 visual plan – 2012
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
32
The work
Liminal spaces 1 was set up in a single cube space at The Block. Projections onto,
through and behind ‘screens’ created a reciprocal relationship in the 5.3m3 black
space between audience, image, sound and the space itself. Interactive elements
positioned the audience as potential controller of the work. The two installation
images shown below (Figure 26) capture exactly the same space photographed just
seconds apart. Lighting and sonic effects triggered by motion sensors completely
altered the audience’s visual and aural experience of the work. Shifts in perception
and experiences of the work posed questions of oppositional logic and assumptions
of presence as elements of the work were revealed or seemingly altered
Figure 25: Liminal spaces 1, installation still (black voile, projected animation, canvas), The Block QUT 2012
Figure 26: Liminal spaces 1, installation stills (black voile, projected animation, canvas, UV light, UV sensitive ink), The Block, QUT 2012
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
33
Figure 27: Liminal spaces 1 / fire, installation still (canvas, texture paste, projected animations), The Block QUT 2012
A large black canvas was installed centrally in the cube. Dividing the space and
acting as a two-sided screen, the canvas presented a physical boundary between
the dualities presented. Heavily textured on one side and with two projections of a
fire animation onto the surface, the canvas was on one side resonant of a cave wall,
inviting close inspection and evoking touch. Flat on the other side, the canvas was
positioned behind three overlapping, translucent, black voile panels, almost invisible
in the darkened space. A projection of a drawn animation and UV light effects
triggered by interaction provided further alternate experiences of the work and the
space in which it was installed. Projected imagery, shadows and reflections met with
material form to present perceptual ambiguities between actual and virtual elements
of the work (Figures 26–28).
The result and reflection
Most aspects of liminal spaces 1 were realised as planned. Observation and
feedback indicated that audience experience was well aligned with the intentions of
the work, especially regarding motion sensor activated elements. Many audience
members were attracted to a single shaft of light, despite its positioning in the corner
furthest from the room entry. Upon stepping into the light, a complete change of
state was triggered to reveal hidden, invisible elements referential to Plato’s Simile
of the Cave and the dualities it presents.
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
34
The space of the mixed reality work however did not feel genuinely entered, despite
audience interactivity in and between hanging panels at times. Positioning of audio
failed to fill the relatively small space, resulting in an obvious boundary for the work
– a disconnection. Highlighting the importance of audience embodiment in the
space, considerations for subsequent work looked at ways to extend the physical
space and to surround the audience with not only the visual but also audio
elements, to work in conjunction with visual changes. Future iterations needed to
ensure that the audience was less aware of distinctions between physical and
temporal.
Figure 28: Liminal spaces 1, installation still, (black voile, projected animation, canvas), The Block QUT 2012
Liminal spaces: escaping the frame – Planning and development
2 - 3 May 2013 – The Block, QUT
Following the presentation of liminal spaces 1, a significant amount of reflection and
planning foregrounded the testing of major elements of the final exhibition in The
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
35
Block space during May 2013. Plan diagrams and drawings were used alongside a
scale model of the space to accurately determine distances, visual effects and the
relative scale of works.
The design of the installation (Figure 29) mirrored the double helix methodology and
the underlying metaphors of duality, binary opposition and liminality – co-existent
forms and the interstitial spaces between. As the audience progressed through the
space, they encountered shifting experiences of the work driven by interaction.
Figure 29: Detailed plan of exhibition space – Liminal spaces: escaping the frame, May 2013
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
36
Figure 30: Journal extract – exhibition development plan, May 2013
Due to the immense scale of the works, a vital part of the planning process was the
early construction of a physical model of the exhibition space – the ‘Baby Block’.
The accurately scaled version of the space, including hanging grid, made the early
visualisation, and ultimate production of the final work possible. Installation of scaled
works within the space of the model accurately informed decisions regarding size,
placement and nature of the hanging panels, as well as lighting and projection
considerations in the overall 22x11x9m space.
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
37
Figure 31 'Baby Block' scale model (1cm:333cm), April 2013
Figure 32: Installation tests – Polythene film panels, each panel 6m x 2m, May
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
38
Connexion: space, place, time
17 - 23 June 2013 – Lines in the Sand Festival, Stradbroke Island
A collaborative project, Connexion: place / space / time presented an opportunity to
position virtual elements of the work back into a natural space on Stradbroke Island.
The outcomes offered some important considerations that warrant mention.
Objectives of the work were to make visible connections between natural forms and
virtual representation of these. The residency culminated in projection of a video
work onto a large cliff face at South Gorge from a distance of 78 metres. Perceptual
ambiguities resulted as the video imagery merged with the actual landforms on
which it was overlaid. No clear distinction between the two was evident, as
illustrated in the following images.
Figure 33 Connexion: space / place / time, environmental video projection, collaboration with Catherine Schoch, June 2013 (Viola 1990, 450)
Figure 34: Connexion: space / place / time, environmental video projection, collaboration with Catherine Schoch, June 2013 (Zuber 2013)
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
39
Connexion raised questions about the nature of hybridity, but also offered answers.
Despite the audience involvement as passive viewer of the work, it clearly brought
together actual and virtual elements to arrive at a third state, a liminal space that
presented a new actuality and virtual presence.
Liminal spaces: escaping the frame
26 - 27 June 2013 – The Block, QUT
Liminal spaces: escaping the frame, the final MA exhibition, applied the learning
from the first and second iterations of the research, extending earlier contexts by
considering ideas of Michel De Ceteau where he delineates the liminal, the interstice
or ”in-between”, as a threshold suggesting a metaphorical entrance where a new
experience begins (Zuber 2013).
Figure 35: virtually there... 1 & 2, mixed media on canvas, 2013
The final installation consisted of two parts indicating dualities of form and
perception. Each part considered the space it was installed in, the device it was
presented on or through and the relationships between each. On entry, the audience
encountered actual works on canvas representing my experience, perception and
memory of the two cave environments. Like all elements of the installed work, the
composition and arrangement of the canvases were in themselves a metaphor for
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
40
the hybrid relationships sought As the audience encountered the various spaces
they were presented with elements of the installation that echoed the
complementary relationships of the helix methodology, highlighting shifting
perspectives around a central axis.
The original experience of the two caves was one of embodiment but also
disconnection, textured inner surface against flat outer ‘screen’, light opposite dark,
hand rendering versus digital image capture. These relationships were mirrored in
the physical positioning, selection and intent of all elements. The paintings were
actual in a material sense, yet virtual in memory as articulated by Dan Mafé when
discussing his own paintings –
“…the paintings are never fully present to the eye but instead are only wholly present, virtually, in memory… [they] present an experience of flux, of ambiguity, and do so optically and conceptually” (Mafé 2009)
Considering Mafe’s statement in relation to my own work, 'actual' means 'material'
(tangible) – a physical presence. But it can also be 'virtual' as the subject matter is
not itself present, only its interpretation, even if that interpretation manifests itself as
physical. Further blurring of boundaries between states of being becomes apparent.
Figure 36: memory... (left): realisation... (right), mixed media on canvas, 2012
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
41
Like the full exhibition space, the canvases conceptually mirrored the methodology
employed – actual and virtual fusing in the realisation of the whole. However, the
paintings also raised questions about the opposition of actual and virtual as material
and ephemeral, again suggesting ambiguities and questioning assumptions of
definition.
Inviting further exploration, large rear projection screens presented an
encompassing panoramic merging of the two environments depicted with digital
photographs capturing external views of the caves in Hungary and Stradbroke
Island (see Figure 37). The images were taken at different times, in different places,
on different devices, yet were recognised at an early juncture as being almost
identical in composition. Moving from desaturation to full colour, the images slowly
overlaid to become the same – a hybrid image – before re-emerging as the
opposite. Shadows cast onto the screens from the audience behind and silhouettes
in front potentially added an ambiguity to the slowly changing works.
Figure 37: merge..., synchronised digital image animations, 2013
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
42
Progressing the work by taking the viewer deeper into the space, hybridised images
combined hand rendered but digitally captured, deconstructed and animated
drawings overlaid with manipulated digital photographs. Each part had been
completed without reference to the other yet with again revealed an almost perfect
overlay highlighting the importance of memory in the realisation of the virtual image.
Figure 38: Liminal spaces: escaping the frame, installation still (hybrid photographs/animated drawings), 2013
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
43
Upon entering the main ‘cave’, further dual relationships became apparent,
encountered through directional audio, large scaled clear film and mesh panels,
projections and light. Transitional binaries presented were:
Left Right
white black
haptic visual
handcrafted digital
object space
inner outer
light shadow
permanent ephemeral
actual virtual
Figure 39: Liminal spaces: escaping the frame, installation still, 2013
Processual layers of the work were extended by audience interaction and immersion
in and through the space where perceptual shifts in the binaries were encountered:
a visualization of liminal space and hybrid experience.
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
44
Figure 40: Liminal spaces: escaping the frame, installation still, 2013
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
45
Figure 41: Liminal spaces: escaping the frame, installation still, 2013
APPLICATION OF DOUBLE HELIX METHODOLOGY TO CREATIVE PRACTICE
The creative outcomes of this research together with reflection on the context of the
study and theoretical considerations can be applied to the double helix diagram,
thereby testing its validity as an appropriate hybrid practice led research model.
The two cave environments that provided emotive and perceptual stimuli as well as
context now replace the generic terminology on the twisting strands of Influence, as
seen in diagram 3 (Figure 42). Oppositions encountered through my personal
experiences and reaction to the caves were contextualised through an investigation
of binary opposition, metaphoric framing of an artwork, the co-relative nature of each
binary, and ideas of potentiality and ephemerality as opposed to materiality and
permanence. The central axis became indicative of a merging of seeming opposites,
bringing these together to arrive at a state of liminality – a threshold where neither is
dominant. Contextual research into Derrida’s theory of différance and Plato’s Simile
of the cave and The divided line provided a theoretical framework for the
conceptualisation of the research.
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
46
Figure 42: Hybrid Arts Practice – Double Helix Methodology (diagram 3) – application to hybrid media visual art practice led research, © 2012
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
47
CONCLUSIONS
The creative outcomes of the research combined actual and virtual materials and
processes in the generation of constructed, immersive, mixed reality environments.
Blends of the physical and the mediated, the hand-crafted and the digital, form and
space, actual and virtual were presented in three iterations of the exhibited work.
Each iteration contributed data to the concepts put forward by the research
question. However, as an entire body of work, the physical (audience) and mediated
generation of new relational combinations of the heterogeneous forms employed
has identified and defined the notion of authentic hybridity within the practice.
Liminal spaces 1 tested material form against ephemeral state, bringing the
audience into the work as participant and potential driver of its being. Problems
arising from this first iteration were addressed in the development time within the full
exhibition space, applying learning through the use of scale models to maximise the
ability of the final installation to deliver a mixed reality, immersive environment.
Identified limitations of the first iteration highlighted the importance of physically
moving through the work and using surround audio as an integral component of the
work if genuine immersion was to be experienced by an audience.
Connexion: space / place / time presented the opportunity to take digital aspects of
the developing body of work back into the environment, further testing possibilities of
actual, digital and temporal hybridity through combinations of physical forms and
mediated imagery. In realising the final work, projected imagery blended with the
physical environment to establish a new ontology for the digital video sequences,
genuinely mixing realities, so that the hybrid space was independent of recognisable
connections to the original. However, the works were ephemeral in nature, and
almost entirely mediated, allowing for limited generation of effect.
Liminal spaces: escaping the frame saw the culmination of two and a half years of
investigation into hybrid art forms synthesised into an extensive installation of
carefully planned and synthesised artworks. The space itself intentionally echoed
the double helix methodology as it was presented as a series of binary oppositions
that coalesced to a hybrid state. Differentiation of virtual images and actualities was
designed to be problematical, with effects and images dissolving into new realities
through hybrid overlays, raising further questions of logical opposition of actual and
virtual representation in the mixed reality work.
The installed works had a predetermined number of possibilities prior to audience
intervention. The pre-set state changes saw variants triggered by motion sensors –
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
48
UV light, motion sensors, surveillance camera projection, audio direction, light
sources, projected animations). However, the possibilities for the work, its
generative nature, were determined by audience interaction and immersion.
Physically, the actual objects became altered by the temporal elements impacting
on them. With front lighting, the large, transparent, plastic hanging panels acted as
an almost invisible support for hand rendered drawings, yet became vibrant moving
images when simultaneously lit from behind by the fire animation. With a state
change triggered by audience interaction, the white textured marks on the plastic
became secondary to a powerful warm glow from behind, reminiscent of a distant
sun. On the other side of the central axis of the hybrid installation work, vertical
banding of the black mesh panels, backlit by two corner projections, could be
considered suggestive of a secondary viewing of a digitised screen, as if watching a
filmed version of moving imagery on a computer screen. On a switch of states, the
focus instantly shifted to the mesh panels themselves, as they became the visible
support for a previously imperceptible bright circular motif made discernible by UV
light. An audience member entering a subtly designated space, marked by a
circular, black disc in the centre of the floor, initiated state changes. Simultaneously
shifting focus from front to rear, left to right, or vice versa depending on other
audience members’ positions in the immersive work, the circular space was
transformed by a powerful downward spotlight, momentarily blinding the person
standing beneath it. As their eyes became accustomed to the light, the person
standing in it was slowly able to adjust their vision to see their own distorted image
projected live in front of them, centred between the oppositional spaces (Figure 41).
The self-image was intended as a metaphor for hybrid states of being with deeper,
enlightened understanding – a transfer of focus and embodied awareness of
alternate realities suggested.
Emerging from the research, a research model was developed for hybrid practice,
which is represented diagrammatically by a double helix methodology diagram. The
model successfully addresses the fluid, non-hierarchical, dynamic relationships
encountered in blending oppositional factors found in mixed reality works. The
Hybrid Arts Research Model is now available for wider application to hybrid media
practice and was presented for peer review at the 2013 Rethinking Intermediality in
the Digital Age Conference in Transylvania.
The nature of actuality and virtuality in the mixed reality artwork is open to debate
and dependent on the various lenses through which it may be viewed. However, this
research establishes that a definition of authentic hybridity in mixed reality works
Chapter 4: Creative Outcomes
49
includes the integration of combinations of heterogeneous forms, both physical and
temporal, to achieve a genuine state of liminality through crossing of thresholds and
blending of oppositional factors. Such blending of oppositional factors must also
have an equivalent importance of two or more diverse elements so that neither
takes hierarchical precedence, but it also includes ambiguities of and slippage
between states of being with shifting emphases. These factors are not only directed
by the artist but also are independently activated by immersion and subsequent
interaction by the audience to realise the potentialities of the work.
References 50
REFERENCES
Armstrong, John. 2000. Move closer:An intimate philosophy of art New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Barker, Tim. 2009. Process and (mixed) reality: A process philosophy for interaction in mixed reality environments. In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Orlando, Florida, USA, 19-22 October, 17-23: iCinema Centre for Interactive Cinema, The University of New South Wales. http://www.icinema.unsw.edu.au/papers.html (accessed 01/05/2011).
Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. New York Semiotext(e).
Benford, Steve, Greenhalgh, Chris, Reynard, Gail, Brown, Chris and Koleva, Boriana. 1998. Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 5 (3):185-223.
Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2005. Postproduction: Culture as screenplay: How art reprograms the world. New York: Lukas & Sternberg.
Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational aesthetics. [France] :: Les presses du réel.
Burrell, Andrew. 2012a. "Making the green one red." Making the green one red, April 12 Accessed 5 September, 2012. http://miscellanea.com/artworks/virtual_macbeth/.
Burrell, Andrew. 2012b. "Virtual macbeth: Project history." miscellanea.com. Accessed 7 Sept 2012. http://miscellanea.com/virtual-macbeth-project-history/.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1 : The movement-image. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/qut/docDetail.action?docID=10151071 (accessed 12/02/2012).
Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition. London: Athlone Press. http://libcat.library.qut.edu.au/record=b1352654&searchscope=8.
Drendel, J et al. 2011. Geometry of the DNA double helix. In Math 474, Spring 2011. Colorado: Colorado State University.
Friedberg, Anne. 2006. The virtual window: From alberti to microsoft. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. http://qut.summon.serialssolutions.com/link/0/eLvHCXMwY2BQsDRMSUoxTTY3N7cwNUgyNk1MMTUzsUw0Al3xkGaWaIQy2IZUmruJMsi4uYY4e-gWlpbEQ4cv4pOAVZSJubGZsaEYAwuwS5zKx9liEz6fyWdKe9DXJXoPrtcCAPZYHl4 (accessed 12/10/2011).
References
51
Frost, Andrew. 2014. William kentridge – the refusal of time – interview. The Guardian. 21 February 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/culture/australia-culture-blog/2014/feb/21/william-kentridge-the-refusal-of-time-interview (accessed 5 March 2014).
Graham, Beryl. and Cook, Sarah. 2010. Rethinking curating : Art after new media. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Grau, Oliver. 2003. Virtual art : From illusion to immersion. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
Irvine, Martin. 2011. Hybridity: Decoding the recombinant DNA of contemporary culture. http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/irvinem/CCTP725/hybridity-intro.html (accessed 02/05/2011).
Lévy, Pierre. 1998. Becoming virtual : Reality in the digital age. New York :: Plenum Trade.
Mafé, Daniel. 2009. Rephrasing voice : Art, practice-led research and the limits and sites of articulacy, Queensland University of Technology. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/32131/.
Mills, Wendy. 1990. "Signing." http://www.wendy-mills.com/exhibition/images/F_sign.jpg (accessed 12/04/2012)
Mills, Wendy. 1991. "Site of judgement." http://www.wendy-mills.com/exhibition/images/F_judge.jpg (accessed 12/04/2012)
Mills, Wendy. 2003. Wendy mills. Fortitude Valley, Qld. :: IMA.
Moholy-Nagy, László. 1923–1930. Light prop for an electric stage University of Washington. http://dds.caup.washington.edu/sp01/DDB/4.Kinetic-art/images.invis/moholy-nagy.jpg (accessed.
Monet, Claude. 1920-26a. "Les grandes décorations." http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/art/19th/painting/cc_monet012.jpg (accessed 30/03/2011)
Monet, Claude. 1920-26b. "Les grandes décorations." http://www.unf.edu/~fmille/monet2.jpg%C2%A0(accessed 21/05/2011)
Plato., Lee, Henry Desmond Pritchard Sir and Lane, M. S. 2007. The republic. 2nd ed. / with a new introduction by Melissa Lane. ed. London :: Penguin.
Popper, Frank. 2007. From technological to virtual art. Cambridge, MA :: MIT Press.
Popper, Frank and Nechvatal, Joseph. 2004. Origins of virtualism: An interview with frank popper. Art Journal 63 (1):63-77. http://proquest.umi.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=05-18-2016&FMT=7&DID=595796851&RQT=309&cfc=1 (accessed 21/05/21011).
References
52
Richards, K. Malcolm. 2008. Derrida reframed interpreting key thinkers for the arts. http://www.qut.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=830108 (accessed 21/05/2012).
Shaw, Jeffrey. 1993. Modalities of interactivity and virtuality http://www.jeffrey-shaw.net/html_main/frameset-writings.php (accessed 10/10/11).
Shaw, Jeffrey. 1996. Configuring the cave. http://www.jeffrey-shaw.net/html_main/frameset-writings.php (accessed 21/05/2011).
Stiles, Kristine. and Selz, Peter Howard. 1996. Theories and documents of contemporary art : A sourcebook of artists' writings. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Viola, Bill. 1990. Video black – the mortality of the image. In Theories and documents of contemporary art: A sourcebook of artists' writings 5 p. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1979. Process and reality : An essay in cosmology. Ed. D. R. Griffin and D. W. Sherburne. Corr. ed. ed. New York :: Free Press.
Zuber, Charles. 2013. http://linesstradbroke.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/dsc_0312.jpg (accessed 25/07/2013)
Zuckert, Catherine. 1996. Postmodern platos. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.