Transcript
Page 1: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

1

Beyond Budgeting at Paradigma.What it means to us – and how we make it real!

BBRT Europe 41 meeting, 1 April 2008

Page 2: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

2

The Paradigma group

Page 3: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

3

The man behind the business idea

Solar energysystems

Wood pelletssystems

Gas-fired condensing

systems

The Paradigma group

What have Paradigma solar collectors achieved in terms of environmental protection, up to now?

Carbon dioxide savings: 200,000 tons

Fuel oil savings: 80 million liters

Page 4: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

4

Evolutionary pathways within an organization's life

October 2006 – the inspiration for the beyond budgeting journey at our firm (or: The slide that really got me thinking…)

Foundation Several decades oldTime scale: organization's age

Low degree of decentralization/ empowerment and fixed performance contracts: in conflict with today's critical success factors!

Differentiationphase

Classic evolution path: stagnation within the tayloristic model

Pioneeringphase

Classic evolution path: professionalization, bureaucratization and functional differentiation

Integrationphase

Transformation - Revolution through radical devolution and decentralization (alternative path!)

This is our path now!

Maintenance of empowered, trust-based culture, in spite of growth (alternative path!).

Sustaining and deepening of the decentralized model, through generations

Source: Niels Pfläging, “Leading with flexible Targets. Beyond Budgeting in Practice“, 2006

High degree of decentralization/ empowerment with relative performance contracts: aligned with today's critical success factors!

Page 5: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

5

Some steps that initiated our journey.

• October 2006 COGNOS Performance 2006 – everything started here…

• December 2006 Niels Pflaeging meets Paradigma for a first conversation.

• February 2007 1 1/2-day in-house introductory workshop on Beyond Budgeting with some managers.Workshop led by Niels and Gebhard Borck.

Beyond Budgeting at Paradigma - how it started

Page 6: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

6

• March 2007: Decision among the 5 general managers: Result: “We will do it.“. Planning of next steps.

• Sunday, 15.04.2007:„Getting the owner on board“ – 1-day workshop with Alfred Ritter. Result: “Do it, I am at your side!“

• Monday/Tuesday, 16./17.04.2007: 2-day Workshop with the team of 26 German managers of Paradigma Group, plus 2 employee representatives. Result: “We will do it together.“

• May 2007: Formal project start –first small implementation steps

Beyond Budgeting at Paradigma - how it started

Page 7: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

7

area of no influence

area of indirect influence

Reading: possible speed of change per action

Source: “Influence Speedo” - Gebhard Borck

personal area of (direct) influence

Beyond Budgeting at Paradigma – how we started: Speed of change

Page 8: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

8

Communication activities to reach all Paradigma employees, during the earliest stage of the initiative

• “Beyond Budgeting book“ and “Our Iceberg is Melting“ book for all employees

• Information about Beyond Budgeting on the intranet

• “Departmental“ talks

• Since June 2007: „Tandem Meetings“.These are frequent, open discussion forums with 12 participants max.,at the various locations of Paradigma group (moderated by a ”tandem“ of members of the Guiding Coalition),

Beyond Budgeting at Paradigma – how we started

Page 9: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

9

Beyond Budgeting at Paradigma – how we started

Page 10: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

10

Mixed feelings among our employees…

• “Where the hell is the project plan with fixed deadlines for all those involved?”

• “Who is responsible for these changes?“

• “This sounds great – but what are the specific actions required?”

• “Top management and middle management should give it a start and prove this with their good example first. I don't trust them.”

• “This seems to mean that managers will be passing on responsibilities to common employees – so they will work (even) less and we will have to do all the stuff!”

Beyond Budgeting at Paradigma – how we started

Page 11: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

11FIRE

• Flexible (responding adaptively to market demands)

• Integration (of all organization members into the transformation process)

• Respectful (in dealing with people and the environment)

• Effective(as an organization and as people within the team)

An initiative for full model transformation, since mid-2007: At Paradigma, beyond budgeting becomes FIRE!

Page 12: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

12

The change manifesto is aimed to give all people in the Paradigma “flexible boundaries“ for action.

• Manifesto Task Force with 12 people on board – including full general management team and employee representatives

• Started work in May 2007 andconcluded “version 1.00” in September 2007

• First rounds of Tandem Meetingson the “Change manifesto,version 1.00“.

Summer 2007: Paradigma becomes a member of the BBRT.

FIRE

Our “change manifesto”: Writing up the case for change

Page 13: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

13 FIRE

Among the contents:

Our business model (redefined with help of the consultants)

12 new core values and

the 12 principles of the beyond budgeting model

constitute the foundations of our collaboration.

Everyone within the Paradigma group can refer to it!

Our “change manifesto”

Page 14: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

14 FIRE

Our urgency described:

• Insufficient market orientation – too much technology-oriented

• Bad financial performance

• Differences within the top management team

• Collaboration within departments is ok, while trans-departmental collaboration is lousy

• Egoisms at the different locations

• …

Our “change manifesto”:Establishing a sense of urgency among all people in the firm

Page 15: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

15

Our “change manifesto” - the crucial point: How do we, within the organization, perceive human nature?

FIRE

Page 16: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

16 FIRE

We don't believe in … We believe in …

Attitude - People need to work and want to take an interest in it. Under the right conditions, they can enjoy it.

Direction –People will direct themselves towards a target that they accept.

Responsibility –People will seek, and accept responsibility, under the right conditions.

Motivation - Under the right conditions, people are motivated by the desire to realize their own potential.

Creativity –Creativity and ingenuity are widely distributed and grossly underused.

Attitude –People dislike work, find it boring, and will avoid it if they can.

Direction –People must be forced or bribed to make the right effort.

Responsibility –People would rather be directed than accept responsibility, which they avoid.

Motivation –People are motivated mainly by money and fears about their job security.

Creativity – Most people have little creativity - except when it comes to getting round management rules.

Based on Douglas McGregor, ‘The Human Side of Enterprise’, 1960

Our “change manifesto” - the underlying issue: Our assumptions about human nature

Page 17: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

17 FIRE

Core values for the organization, articulated in the change manifesto

• Partnership culture

• Humanist behavior

• Social contribution

• Transparency

• Dialogue-based leadership

• Consultation

• Decentralization

• Trust

• Learning culture

• Attractive place to work

• Targets

• Success

Our “change manifesto” - 12 core values that fit with FIRE

Page 18: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

18 FIRE

Our “change manifesto”:To us, beyond budgeting means a set of 12 principles. No less.

Source: BBRT

Pro

cess

es

7. Goals

8. Rewards

9. Planning

10. Controls

11. Resources

12. Coordination

Set relative goals for continuous improvement

Reward shared success based on relative performance

Make planning a continuous and inclusive process

Base controls on relative indicators and trends

Make resources available as needed

Coordinate cross company interactions dynamically

Negotiated contracts

Fixed targets

Top-down, annual event

Variances against plan

Budget allocations

Annual planning cycles

Lead

ersh

ip

1. Customers

2. Network

3. Autonomy

4. Responsibility

5. Values

6. Transparency

Focus everyone on their customers

Organize as a lean network of accountable teams

Give teams the freedom and capability to act

Enable everyone to think and act like a leader

Govern through a few clear values, goals and boundaries

Promote open information for self management

Hierarchical relationships

Centralized functions

Micro-manage them

Merely follow ‘the plan’

Detailed rules and budgets

Restrict it hierarchically

Do this! Not that!Principles

Page 19: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

19

Our “change manifesto”: If you leave one principle out, you will not succeed.

Page 20: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

20

Management model transformation: Is it like traditional project work?

All of us are FIRE -not just a few!

All of us have do our bit and contribute our share -not just “the others”!

FIRE

“Change will not come if we wait for some other person or if we wait for some other time.

We are the ones we have been waiting for!”(Barack Obama)

Page 21: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

21 FIRE

3. Develop change

vision and strategy

4. Communi-

cate for understan-ding and buy-in

5. Empower all others

to act

6. Produce

short-term wins

7. Don't let up!

8. Create a

new culture

1.Create a sense of urgency

2. Pull

together a guiding coalition

Organizationalchange process(John Kotter)

1. Ending

3. Beginning

2. Neutral Zone

Individualchange process(William Bridges)

In a management model transformation, two intertwined change processes must come together

Source: “Double Helix Transformation Framework“ - Niels Pfläging/Gebhard Borck/BBTN

The “Double Helix Transformation Framework” is a completely new kind of change initiative framework: One in which the two different dimensions of profound change – organizational and personal – are intertwined and inseparable. The framework allows for a richer and more “realistic” leadership of profound change.

Page 22: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

22

Our management model transformation: The role of the Guiding Coalition

Transformation must be led by a strong Guiding Coalition (GC).

The Guiding coalition (GC) is a group of people from different levels and functions of the Paradigma group, who got together on the basis of conviction and determination, to act for change.

Tasks of the GC: Not tasks of the GC:

Get rid of obstacles to FIRE

Support task forces

Support people during the change

Support change in conformity with FIRE

Keep track of FIRE (e.g. check “change temperature”Handle resistance

Push ahead with change

Cater for consequence

FIRE

Take or carry through corporate decisions.“Do the change all alone”

Other important facts: The GC is no elitist circle

The GC is not a new form of hierarchyBeing a member in the GC is no promotion

Page 23: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

23 FIRE

The actual changes throughout transformation are being driven by Task Forces (TFs)

A TF is established on the basis of an urgency/a problem referred to systems/actions differing from the manifesto.

Topics for TF are problems referring to the FIRE change process, not to do jobs which are “daily business”.

A TF is initiated to deal with a clearly defined task.

A TF has to arrive at valid agreements.

A TF always exists for a limited amount of time.

TF are staffed according to the problem/the task, not based on hierarchy or departments.

A TF is staffed through a consultational process or through voting procedures, depending on the task.

Our management model transformation: The role of the FIRE Task Forces

Page 24: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

24 FIRE

From our manifesto for change:

“If people in our organization become entrepreneurs, then they are entitled to complete transparency! There is no more hierarchical/functional withholding of knowledge!”

Some consequences:

• All company figures are open to all people in the firm (e.g. balance sheets, profit and loss accounts, company statistics, market figures).

• Our controllers have got lots of new customers: now they are “business consultants” for everyone in the firm.

• Starting May 2008, salary data will be disclosed within the Paradigma group.

• …

Principles of our management model transformation: Transparency for everyone

Page 25: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

25 FIRE

The world changes permanently and fast, hence we have to look at performance in a relative, not in a fixed way!

Principles of our management model transformation:Changing management processes from “fixed” to “relative”

Planning: Budgeting and other traditional business planning for 2008 was eliminated. Performance measurement: No more fixed targets in the form of Plan/Actual comparisons – reports have been rearranged, using multi-year trends, annual comparisons, and some forecasting. Reporting system is being further improved.Targets: Derived objectives for senior management have been dropped and will not be replaced. Relative targets for teams will be deployed once we have put a new organizational (cell) structure in place.Resource management: We now have dialoguestaking place continuously, applying action planning and on-demand resource coordination.

Page 26: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

26 FIRE

Principles of our management model transformation:Decentralization

Customer and market-oriented reconstruction of the group (“from the outside in”, i. e. “responding to market-pull”)

No more functional “departments”, instead: “cells” with constructive processes following customer/supplier relationships.

Example: Building regional teams

- 28 sales force mavericks,

- 15 field engineers

- 15 back-office sales employees

(all nicely divided into different departments before!), are going to become 6 virtual regional teams!

Page 27: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

27 FIRE

Principles of our management model transformation:New leadership behavior & minimum of hierarchy

What happens if we submit everyone in the firm to “market-pull”?

Why must management staff make decisions hierarchically, if there are external/internal customers in place?Senior management hands over leadership responsibility to all. Concept: dialogue-based leadershipDue to the cell-formation process there will be less management staff. In the new model:

• A part of them is going to be real leaders, according to our new values and model!

• A part of them will become simple members of the business cells, because of their mainly specialist know-how.

• A part of them may not identify with the new model and will resign.

Page 28: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

28

Principles of our management model transformation:FIRE-compatible compensation systems

Immediate action: gross violations of FIRE principles and values are eliminated

1. Profit-sharing agreements for managing directors are dropped

Switch to fixed salaries!

2. Objectives or variables for management staff are dropped (approx. 20% share of income);

Switch to fixed salaries!

3. Annual “appraisal interview” and allowance for employees are dropped (approx. 12% share of income);

Switch to fixed salaries!

4. Objectives and commissions for sales force are dropped (approx. 60% of income)

Switch to fixed salaries!

Page 29: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

29 FIRE

Principles of our management model transformation: FIRE-compatible compensation systems

Entirely new conception of compensation systems, being worked out by a “Compensation Task Force”

What is the individual staff member worth to the organization?

What does income “in conformity with market requirements” mean?

Homogeneous profit-sharing of staff for the whole Paradigma group –focused on “relative market performance”, not on achievement of planned/fixed budget figures

Introduction of “trust-based working hours for everyone”, in the whole Paradigma group

Page 30: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

30 FIRE

Principles of our management model transformation: Open communication

Don‘t talk about each other, but with each other (applies to EVERYONE in the company)

Recognize and remove existing bullying tendencies/structures

Direct communication: fewer mails and more personal conversations

Open discussion platforms, the so-called “tandem meetings”, will continue: topics are discussed together with all interested, without need to find solutions immediately.

(“Will management staff be unnecessary in future?”, “Must all the employees in the company earn the same?”).

Page 31: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

31 FIRE

Our management model transformation:What we are doing right now

The Guiding Coalition increases the pressure for change

The Task Forces achieve first results

We approach publicizing of all salaries to everyone – increasing urgency and hinting at the fact that there is no way back to taylorism and secrecy

Three “cell-formation” workshops in calendar week 14 will break up traditional departments and hierarchical power. The workshops will start the creation of a new, networked, organizational structure

Forthcoming:

Leadership skill training for new model and structure

Creation of a value-flow system,similar to Handelsbanken´s

Page 32: BetaCodexC1 - Case Study "Paradigma" on Transformation

32

René Reinhold, CFO

Paradigma Energie- und Umwelt-technik GmbH & Co. KGwww.paradigma.de

Phone: +49-7202-922 246Mail: [email protected]

Contacts & references

Gebhard Borck BBTN & gberatung

Fritz-Neuert-Str. 13 a75181 Pforzheim - Germany

[email protected]

Niels Pflaeging BBTN & MetaManagement Group

Al. Santos 1.99101419-002 São Paulo – SP, Brazil

[email protected]

Beyond Budgeting Transformation Network – make it real! www.bbtn.org

>beyond budgetingtransformation network.>beyond budgetingtransformation network.