Transcript
Page 1: BESegal Linked In group Statistics display sample 9-11-13

* LinkedIn Alternative Graph Proposal

1/1/08 1/1/09 1/1/10 1/1/11 1/1/12 1/1/13

0

1

2

3

4

5

Daily Number of Members (2-Week Moving Avg)

3.2

5.3

1.1

Average: 2.3

New Members & New Requests (Avg. Daily Request to Join vs. Members Accepted)

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

Total Culm Members

Total Members (Culm. Requests to Join vs. Members Accepted)

Existing Graphs

I propose refining the graphs Linked In uses todisplay data about the growth of a Linked Ingroup. The current version, above, shows just the number of members added on a particular date.This can be misleading if group owners take along time to add members after the date of therequest to join. How about showing both the number of mem-bers actually added, plus the number of peo-ple that request to join a group? This comparison reveals useful information. Itgives prospective group members a sense ofhow long it takes a group owner to add people,which indicates if the group is actively managedor not. The shorter the lag time between re-quests and acceptance the more actively theowner processes requests to join. In the top graph, rather than use the daily total,I use a rolling daily average. This makes it easi-er to see the growth trend over time.

Prepared with Tableau by: Bruce E. Segal [email protected]

Color Key for Both Graphs

Members Added to Group

Requests to Join Group

Recommended