ASIAN LABOUR LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE
A Proceeding Report
Organised by
Asia Monitor Resource Centre, International Domestic Workers Federation, and School
of Labor and Industrial Relations, the University of the Philippines
Venue:
School of Labor and Industrial Relations
University of the Philippines (UP SOLAIR)
29 November to 1 December 2014
1 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 3
Day 1 4
Introduction 4
Welcome Remarks by Dr. Jonathan Sale 4
Panel Discussion I 5
Presentation 1: “Labor and Industrial Globalization: where is the process leading us to?” by Rene
Ofreneo 5
Presentation 2: “The Rise of Non-Standard Employment in Asia” by Melisa Serrano 7
Questions and comments on Panel Discussion I 8
Panel Discussion II 10
Presentation 3: “Labour Migration” by Dennis Arnold 10
Presentation 4: “Migrant Domestic Workers in Asia” by Elizabeth Tang 11
Presentation 5: “Intra-migration in China” by Samuel Li 12
Presentation 6: “Migrant Workers in India from Nepal and Bangladesh” by Surendra Pratap 12
Questions and Comments on Panel Discussion II 14
Panel Discussion III 16
Presentation 7: “Informal Labour in Asia: Organising Strategies” by Nalini Nayak 16
Presentation 8: “Is the Asian Labour Movement Gender-Blind?” by Christal Chan 17
Questions and Comments on Panel Discussion III 18
Day 2 21
Panel Discussion IV 21
Presentation 9: "The Development of Collective Bargaining in China" by Chris Chan 21
2 | P a g e
Presentation 10: "Organising and Campaign Experiences from Domestic Workers" by Fish Ip 22
Presentation 11: "Emerging Labour Resistance in South Asia" by Surendra Pratap 23
Presentation 12: "Labour Protests in Southeast Asia" by Fahmi Panimbang 24
Questions and comments on Panel Discussion IV 25
Group Discussion I: Building Alliances and Networks at Grassroots 26
Report from each Group 27
Day 3 29
Panel Discussion V 29
Presentation 13: "Rethinking the (Asian) Labour Movement" by Dae-Oup Chang 29
Presentation 14: "Democracy, Occupy Movement, and Grassroots Movement in Hong Kong" by
Samuel Li Shing-Hong 31
Presentation 15: "Stories of Dispossession in Plantation and Mining Communities in the Philippines:
Challenges of reclaiming rights and dignity" by Joy Hernandez 32
Questions and Comments on Panel Discussion V 33
Group Discussion II: Vision on Labour Movement in Asia and its Challenges 36
Report from each Group (Question 1: "What is the vision of social transformation shared by labour
movements in Asia?") 36
Report from each Group (Question 2: "What are the challenges to the labour movements in Asia?")
38
Group Discussion III: Solidarity Building 40
Report from each group 40
Comments and recommendations 42
List of Participants 43
3 | P a g e
Executive Summary
Over the course of three days, panel members and participants of Asian Labour Leadership
Conference mapped the landscape of Asian labour with a special focus on experiences of
resistance and solidarity building. Through presentations of history, relevant trends, and
important case studies, the participants of the conference identified commonalities and
peculiarities in the experiences of particular countries, toward a better understanding of the all-
encompassing and globalised nature of the challenges that labour movements in the region face.
Wide-ranging issues like minimum wage, anti-labour legislation, and human rights violations,
were taken side by side with specific concerns, like the question of gender in trade unions, the
plight of migrant workers, and collective bargaining in socialist countries such as China and
Vietnam, among others. In the end, with a better and consolidated idea of the nature of
resistance in Asia, there was a consensus among participants to continue with existing
campaigns while seeking out an altogether new paradigm for the labour movement, in terms of
alternatives to what exists today.
4 | P a g e
Day 1
Introduction
Elizabeth Tang opened the conference by giving a brief history of its inception. The idea for a
labour conference, she said, began to take form during the World Social Forum on Migration
held in Manila from November 26-30, 2012. It was here when participants from various labour
organizations based in different countries in Asia saw the need to create a space where they
could discuss their concerns, share their experiences, and learn together. Together with plans for
establishing an Asian Labour School, the Asian Labour Leadership Conference stemmed from the
participants’ decision to make more concrete steps in building labour solidarity in the region.
Afterwards, Elizabeth described what to expect throughout the three-day conference. The first
day would discuss the increasing dominance of capital and how it impacts the lives of workers
and labour organizations. On the second day, panel and group sessions would aim to elaborate
and lend insight on the various forms of workers’ resistance in various sectors in Asia. The last
day of the conference should look at and assess the common future of labour organizations
amidst current economic policies in Asia.
Welcome Remarks by Dr. Jonathan Sale
In his message, Dr. Jonathan Sale traced the history of labour organisations in the Philippines,
beginning with the foundation of Union Obrera Democratica by Isabelo de los Reyes in 1902. This
union, he pointed out, was very critical of American labour policy. He then proceeded to discuss
the development of labour policies in the country, pointing out contradictions and major issues
in the process.
One instance is the country’s ratification of the World Trade Organization agreements, which
further deepened inequality between capital and labour. Further exacerbating these conditions
is the Supreme Court’s interpretation that globalization is in accord with the Philippine
Constitution. These events, along with the predominant economic policies in the country, have
been detrimental to the workers, particularly in conflict resolutions. Due to the frailty of
organized labour and considerable decline in collective bargaining agreements, the burden of
labour dispute settlement has fallen on compulsory arbitration, which is mainly facilitated by the
5 | P a g e
government.
Meanwhile, membership of so-called “workers’ associations” have increased over time. This is
directly correlated to the increasing number of small enterprises in the informal economy which
employ ambulant, intermittent and itinerant workers. These workers’ associations, however, are
organized only for the purpose of mutual gain and protection, and not for collective bargaining.
Another cause for concern is the Philippine Labor Code, which is supposed to protect the rights
of the workers and give them remedies that are available under law. While the Labor Code and
its implementing rules mention the word “work” and its derivatives, it does not provide a
statutory definition of work. Under Article 13 of the Code, “worker” is defined as any member of
the labor force, whether employed or unemployed. In Article 97, employ “includes to suffer or
permit work”. Therefore, most if not all, of the provisions in the labor code are based on the
existence of an employer-employee relationship, where the rights of workers are not accessible.
Seen to remedy these problems is the proposed Magna Carta of Workers in the Informal
Economy that is currently in Congress. But Dr. Sale warns that whether such a law would pass –
given the composition of lawmakers in the 15th Congress – is entirely another issue.
Panel Discussion I
Presentation 1: “Labor and Industrial Globalization: where is the process
leading us to?” by Rene Ofreneo
Rene Ofreneo’s presentation discussed the history and characteristics of the global production
network (GPN). He pointed out that current practices in international trade and labour market
have created a new glossary of terms, which could be used to describe the nature of GPN.
“Flying geese” – the term, which gained popularity in the 1960s and 1970s, pertains to Japan’s
attempt to transfer its multi-layered industrial structure to East Asia. The model envisioned a
regional hierarchy – with Japan at the forefront – in terms of technological development where
the production of goods would continuously move from advanced countries to less advanced
countries. The key to the process was international subcontracting, which meant transferring
less technological, more labour intensive activities to other Asian countries. One company which
employed this strategy was Toyota, which outsourced the production of various parts of their
vehicles in Southeast Asia. However, Japan was not able to sustain this method due to the non-
6 | P a g e
linear development of economies of Asian countries.
NIDL vs. OIDL – The change from OIDL (old international division of labour) to NIDL (new
international division of labour) signalled the “global industrial shift”, which relocated production
processes from developed countries to developing countries in Asia. This condition is in stark
contrast to the OIDL, where developing countries were only seen as producers of cheap raw
materials and importers of expensive finished products. Multinational Corporations (MNCs) are
seen as the primary facilitators of the NIDL.
GCC – Eventually, debates between NIDL and OIDL have been replaced by discussions on global
commodity chains (GCCs). GCC pertains to the design, production, and marketing of goods by
MNCs across the globe. In the 1990s, GCC quickly became the norm with the advent of the
information and communications technology (ICT) revolution, transport modernization, and
ascendancy of neo-liberal ideology from the formation of the World Trade Organization. For
these reasons, “globalization” eventually replaced “internationalization” as the buzz word in
Asia.
Buyer-driven GCC and Producer-driven GCC – Buyer-driven GCCs are dictated by MNCs that have
no factories but have brands, huge stores, retailers, and partner traders, mainly in Asian, new
industrialized countries (NICs). Products that are produced in this model are mostly light
consumer goods, especially garments, footwear, toys, furniture, etc. On the other hand,
producer-driven GCC are dictated by MNCs which control research and development and design
to production and marketing through a chain of subsidiaries, joint ventures, and outsourcing
partner firms. Here, technology and capital intensive industries produce goods like cars,
computers, etc.
GPN, GVC, GSC – At the turn of the millennium, a new term, global production network (GPN),
was coined. Under this mode, MNCs aim to maximize the global value chain (GVC) through a
rigorous assessment of the global supply chain (GSC) and a better supply chain management
(SCM). Playing an increasingly important role in this framework is the logistics industry to
facilitate seamless operations from the procurement of raw materials to the distribution of
finished products in stores. Mapping of GPNs have also been used by MNCs to determine the
global division of labour based on technology. For instance, assembly parts of cars and airplanes
are sourced in different countries, essentially making them “made in the world”.
From year 2000 onwards, a “tradability revolution” in the services industry took place. As the
WTO embraced the general agreement on trade in services (GATS), mode 1 (consumption
7 | P a g e
abroad), mode 2 (cross-border), mode 3 (commercial presence), and mode 4 (movement of
personnel of service provider) became part of trade vocabulary.
Subsequently, the WTO would coin the phrase “trade in tasks”, which indicated trade processes
becoming highly complex. This globalization of production and services has caused the rise of
new economic models (NEMs) and the spread of precarity, reaffirming MNCs domination of
global, regional, and national economies. Meanwhile, indigenous production and marketing
outside the framework of globalization hardly progress.
Despite today’s global financial crisis, neo-liberal policy regimes are still in place in many
countries and remain unchanged. Two big advances of the neo-liberal framework are: first, the
privatisation of social services and infrastructure development via public-private partnerships
(PPP); and second, the liberalisation of land and markets.
To conclude, Ofreneo pointed out the following questions to the participants: can MNCs be
tamed? Can globalization be re-directed to a race to the top? How different will be this from the
race to the bottom? How do we humanize globalization?
Presentation 2: “The Rise of Non-Standard Employment in Asia” by Melisa
Serrano
In her presentation, Melisa Serrano initially pointed out the difficulty in defining non-standard
employment (NSE) in Asia due to the variety of terms, forms, and concepts that each country
used. She explained that even within ASEAN and east-Asian nations, there are differences on the
definitions and usage of types of NSE such as “casual work”, “contract of service”,
“contract/piece paid”, “project-based”, “seasonal work”, “contract work”, etc.
However, Serrano also pointed out the commonalities between these types of NSE. Some of
these are: fixed or short duration of employment contract; lower and unstable incomes; limited
or absence of social security benefits; work at multiple worksites; dominance of elementary
occupations; dangerous and risky jobs without insurance; over-representation of women and
young workers, but increasingly among older workers in East Asia (except Taiwan); workers are
largely unorganised, non-unionised; dominance of service jobs; use of fixed term contracts
through outsourcing in almost all sectors and across a variety of occupations; and outsourcing is
increasingly done within the enterprise.
8 | P a g e
Throughout the ASEAN and East Asia, the recorded incidence of NSE has been high and
increasing, due mainly to employers’ views on variability of demand and the need to reduce
workforce. In Indonesia, 65% of employment could be attributed to NSE; in Malaysa, 25% and in
the Philippines, 33%. In Korea, the rise of in-house subcontracting has greatly contributed to an
increase in NSE.
Yet, studies show the lack of positive impact that NSE has to a country’s GDP and economic
growth. In the Philippines, for instance, the increase in NSE does translate to a decrease in its
unemployment rate. In Korea, in-house subcontracting could not be attributed to the higher
wages of its regular workers. In a survey, more respondents (40%) also believed that outsourcing
actually leads to higher costs than lesser costs (32%) in the production.
NSE also poses several issues to labour unions and organisations. In Malaysia and the Philippines,
there has been a declining trend of labour union organisations. Singapore and Vietnam,
however, have increasing trends of unionisation. The actual representation of NSE workers in
labour unions is another issue, as most labour organizations are usually structured to address
concerns of regular workers and employees. Serrano reiterates that NSE is a multi-faceted issue
that requires a multi-dimensional approach.
Questions and comments on Panel Discussion I
Question 1: Regarding globalisation and NSE, what can trade unions and activists do to counter
it? What are the other possible strategies available to these organisations?
Answer 1 (Melissa Serrano): It depends on how unions understand NSE and on their willingness
to innovate. They are part of the trade union structure, but they are not represented as a
specific structure in the trade union organisation. Innovation exists for contractual workers;
there are very specific conditions for very specific structure, but these are still within the overall
structure of the trade union. Trade unions and organisations are governed by two existing logic:
the logic of accommodation and the logic of transformation. There should be equal balance
between the two.
Answer 2 (Rene Ofreneo): In trade unions and organisations, they have not gone beyond slogans.
It is easy to do slogans, but the challenge is, how do you operationalise it? There are different
steps and actions for different countries and conditions. We really need to analyse these things
carefully.
9 | P a g e
Comment 1: Twenty five years ago, workers of the company Bosch in Bangalore, India did not
allow their products to be labelled as “made in Germany”. Strategies like these could be effective
in reaching agreements with MNCs.
Comment 2: In a study of workers of the automobile industry in New Delhi, they found out that
the number of workers actually did not change for the last 5 years. They used a downsized
workforce (permanent, contractual workers), but compel them to do overtime work (around 3
hours to 8 hours of overtime). Contractual workers are also having difficulty getting enrolled in
trade unions because the government does not recognize them as normal workers
Comment 3: In Indonesia, our unions organise all types of workers. We don’t differentiate
between outsourced, contractual, irregular, regular, etc. We organise as many as possible
regardless of their status and category.
Some companies put out the work to the entire family (home-based work system), where most
of the family members are employed. However, they are not aware that they are being
exploited. Instead, they are told that it is good because they can also take care of their children
while working, but they are paid very little and exploited. For example, they pay for the
electricity costs related to their work. It is not easy to organise, but we try to fight.
Comment 4: In Cambodia, the government is exerting pressure for workers not to join labour
unions. Another issue is that most union organizers don’t have training in the universities, so
they don’t know the existing laws which protect worker’s rights.
Question 2 (to Rene Ofreneo): I want to know your observation regarding the response of labour
unions in countries who are involved in free trade agreements and who are members of the
WTO. How do they respond to these trends that you have elaborated?
Answer 3 (Rene Ofreneo): Ever since, WTO kept on reiterating the need to liberalise to its
members. One of the most contentious areas is agriculture. It is hypocritical for US and Europe
to talk of liberalisation when they protect their own farmers (mainly through the US Farm Bill of
America and Common Land Act of Europe). In other words, the MNCs want a free market, but
not for the patents and new technologies, so that they can continue to impose monopoly prices.
Due to the failure of talks within the WTO, bilateral and regional free trade talks (China with
Australia, Korea with individual ASEAN countries, etc.) have appeared. Most of these talks
10 | P a g e
reaffirmed not only the need to liberalise economies, but to respect and preserve the MNCs’
ownership of intellectual property rights. The World Bank and Asian Development Bank often
talk about the increasing inequality and gap in wealth, but they have no clear solution for it.
Their rhetorics do not match.
The concept of social contract was formed during post-war period, but it has disintegrated since.
The question is, do we revive the social contract? What should be its form in lieu of
globalisation? In 2010, a framework was formed by the UN which discussed the duties of
corporations to respect human and labour rights. But how do you operationalize these?
Panel Discussion II
Presentation 3: “Labour Migration” by Dennis Arnold
Dennis Arnold’s presentation began by showing in broad strokes the current situation of global
migration: 215 million people live outside their countries of birth, an increase from 84.5 million
in 1975, and where 105 million are international migrant labourers; 43% of Asian migrants move
within the region; and that globally, 700 million people migrate within their countries. Arnold
cautions that these figures are just estimates, as reliable data on irregular migrants is lacking.
Migration, however, is nothing new. In the century following 1820, about 60 million Europeans
left for the “New World”. From 1846-1940, about 48-52 million people migrated from India and
Southern China to different parts of Southeast Asia, the Indian Ocean Rim, and South Pacific. In
the same period, around 46-51 million also migrated from Northeast Asia and Russia to
Manchuria, Siberia, Central Asia, and Japan.
In the 1960s, neoclassical economists formulated a series of hypotheses concerning the volume
of migration and its streams and counter-streams, particularly the “push” factors at the place of
origin which stimulated “moves”, and the “pull” factors which attracted “movers”. But this
approach eventually became criticised for positioning migrant workers as being determined and
overwhelmed by economic structural forces and without having any agency.
Another view is the dual labour market theory, which claims that modern industrial labour
markets are divided into two sectors: the primary sector and secondary sector, which is
composed mostly of migrants and women. The reality, however, is that migrants are neither at
the fringes of labour markets nor an anomaly. In fact, migrants are at the centre of the
11 | P a g e
contemporary labour process, replacing the male blue collar worker as the paradigmatic worker.
Theories of national development seldom paid much attention to international migration. It was
only recently that the labour migration debate began to take into account the complexity of the
development-migration interaction. The size of migrant worker communities and the volume of
remittances that they produced prompted theoretical models that emphasised financial flows.
The World Bank claims that remittances generally: reduce the level and severity of poverty,
translate to better access to social services, formal financial sector services, and to information
and communication technologies, as well as bring about higher human capital accumulation.
Many oppose these views, believing that the World Bank is covering up for the failures of its neo-
liberalisation projects, and precisely because migrants have become part of the solution to these
failures.
At present, two contrasting beliefs in migration studies exist – one that links it heavily on the
economic aspect of migration which emphasise exploitation and precarisation; and the other,
more positive view that celebrates migrants’ hybridity, the so-called “cosmopolitanism from
below”, and the migrants’ contribution to economic growth via remittances.
Presentation 4: “Migrant Domestic Workers in Asia” by Elizabeth Tang
Most migrant workers going out of their country end up as domestic workers. In fact, almost half
of the 53 million migrant workers are domestic workers.
One of the most common experiences of migrant workers is debt bondage. Most of these
migrant domestic workers go through private recruitment agencies where they are often
exploited by being forced to pay around four to seven months’ worth of salary for recruitment
fees. In many cases, they are also forced to sign contracts without having read the contracts.
Migrant domestic workers differ from other migrant workers in the sense that, despite their big
numbers, they are actually invisible. Once they arrive in their countries of destination, they
immediately go to individual households because of the live-in arrangements with their
employers. This gives them very little or almost no possibility of going out. Employers and
agencies that hold their passports compound this problem even further. For these conditions,
migrant domestic workers are among the most vulnerable.
12 | P a g e
From an organising standpoint, migrant domestic workers also present various challenges. In
some countries, organising migrant domestic workers is very difficult because the governments
do not allow it (an example is Malaysia). Migrant domestic workers also include “local” domestic
workers who only move within their country. In India, for instance, most migrant domestic
workers belong to the rural-to-urban migration. At present, the Federation of Domestic Workers
in Hong Kong is the only organisation in the world that organises domestic workers (either local
or migrant) of multiple nationalities. Through this organisation, migrant domestic workers are
increasingly engaging with the issues that confront them.
Presentation 5: “Intra-migration in China” by Samuel Li
As of 2013, there are about 269 million migrant workers in China. This migration of workers is
primarily driven by China’s rapid economic growth and urbanisation, as well as the following
factors: the shortage of labour in urban areas, the failure of developmental policies in the rural
regions, and the perceived promise of progress and prosperity that urban areas have.
A major issue from this intra-migration of labour is the discrimination against migrant workers
from rural areas. In most cases, they are paid less compared to their colleagues who come from
the cities. They are also forced to do long overtime work, and they have no adequate social
protection from work-related injuries and illnesses.
On average, migrant workers stay in the same city for about 10-20 years. Over time, this results
to a “localisation” of migrant workers into the urban areas. An important phenomenon to take
note is how this intra-migration of labour has precipitated a new generation of workers. Of the
269 million migrant workers, 125 million were born after 1980. Mainly working in the
manufacturing industry, these younger workers usually have higher educational attainment, use
social media more often, and are not overtly concerned about the precocity of their jobs, leading
to higher attrition rates in workplaces.
Presentation 6: “Migrant Workers in India from Nepal and Bangladesh” by
Surendra Pratap
Migrant workers from Bangladesh and Nepal form the major section of foreign migrants in India.
There is no reliable data on migrant workers from Bangladesh and there are rare if any studies
on them. They are also not organized and therefore not socially and politically visible. Nepalese
13 | P a g e
citizens immigrating to India constitute nearly 68 percent of total Nepalese emigrants. 23
percent of all Nepali households receive remittances, of which 33 per cent is only from India.
More than 1 million Nepalese are working in India. Among the male Nepali migrant workers in
India, 60 percent work in restaurant/bars; 20 percent as security guards/watch¬men, 10 percent
in factories and the rest are engaged in various casual jobs. Among women Nepalese migrants,
50 percent work as domestic workers, 10 percent as factory workers, 25 percent as housewives
and a significant percentage presumably as sex workers. There may be about 200,000 Nepali
women in Indian brothels.
All migrant workers including Nepalese and Bangladeshi migrants face following problems:
a) Brokers often exploit women, promising a job in some country and trafficking them to
brothels in India
b) While crossing the borders all migrant workers face harassment, particularly while going
back home
c) They also face discrimination in terms that landowners asking comparatively higher rents
from foreign migrants, as it also happens in case of migrants from south and north east
India
d) Sexual harassment. The problem is aggravated due to their isolation in society, and
because no one comes to help them. Furthermoer, they face discrimination in police
stations and administrative offices.
Most serious problems relate to the problems in getting the ID card in India. Address proof and
ID proof are the basic requirements for getting Ration card, Adhar card and other welfare cards.
The landlords are never willing to give in writing that they live in their premises, so they are
never able to provide an address proof. Less than 10 percent of Nepalese migrants have any
such ID cards and they are able to get benefit of such welfare schemes. For other migrants the
problem is even more serious. Therefore, they are unable to get subsidized items from public
distribution system (PDS) shops and also denied cooking gas connection, so compelled to
purchase cooking gas from black market at four times higher rate. In many cases, the employers
do not put their names in their enrolment registers so they do not have the proof of
employment. Following the policy of KYC (Know your Customer), bank does not open any bank
account for migrant workers for lack of address proof and ID proof. Because they do not have
bank account, they are unable to claim their pension and insuratance-related benefits. So the
workers willingly give their consent to employers for no PF deductions. Interestingly, it is in these
situations, the trade unions focusing only on shop-floor issues, become irrelevant for these
workers.
14 | P a g e
Questions and Comments on Panel Discussion II
Comment 1: I have seen so many migrant domestic workers (Filipinos, Bangladeshi, Indian) in
gulf countries and their experiences are really horrifying. For instance, there was this lady sitting
next to me on a plane, she was crying. She told me she was going back to her home country. She
said that her passport was taken by her employer on the first day of her work. She worked for
that employer for six months, but only three months’ worth of her salary was paid. On the sixth
month, her employer’s entire family accompanied her to the airport, gave her the boarding pass,
without paying a single cent owed to her.
In construction sites, 10-15 migrant workers are crammed inside a very small room. Living
conditions in the site itself are also very poor.
My point is, what can we do to address these cases of domestic workers? How can we help
them? Is there social protection available for them?
Comment 2: In Malaysia, one problem that Cambodian migrant domestic workers encounter is
the discrimination that they get from the local population. Malaysians perceive the Cambodians
to be stealing their jobs and money. Another is hard labour and physical abuse. Some even die
from it. So how do we address these problems? My idea is that we start within our own home.
We need to strengthen laws and the recognition of rights of workers in Cambodia itself.
Question 1 (Nalini): Obviously there is a gradual withdrawal of the state and its institutions in
addressing the issues of migrant workers. My question is, what is the role of trade unions in
highlighting the state’s role of protecting these sectors?
Comment 3: In Bangladesh, domestic workers are excluded from the national labour act. There
have been initiatives of organising domestic workers, but this is only limited to local domestic
workers.
Comment 4: Qatar, in particular is a very oppressive country for migrant domestic workers.
Answer 1 (Elizabeth Tang): Yes, Qatar might be the worst, but governments of Asian countries
are not doing much better. One agenda in government meeting is collective contract. We
oppose the model contract because it does not recognize the legal rights of domestic workers.
This is important because this gives legal basis. We also need to openly tell stories of exploitation
of migrant domestic workers. Finally, I want to remind people that, aside from being critical of
15 | P a g e
foreign governments where these abuses are perpetuated, we need to compel our own
governments to protect their own people in countries where they migrate and work to.
Answer 2 (Dennis Arnold): On the issue of social protection and reproduction, I think this is one
of the key issues we have to address. Social protection is indeed being withdrawn and reduced
(as seen from austerity measures in Europe and other countries, gradual and dramatic reduction
in social protections and weakening of labour rights and protection). It’s not the state
withdrawing or becoming less prominent, but there is a shift in their priorities.
Another issue of contention is how the World Bank is championing social protection (deepening
commodification of social protection, return of investment). There are also issues within existing
labour unions. For instance, there is a case in the 1990s and early to mid-2000s where unions in
Thailand were united in calls to expel Burmese migrants out of the country. While many Thai
unions have changed their position, it has elicited various responses from Burmese trade unions,
which came to rely on themselves rather than solely local unions. The idea is for migrant workers
organisations to draw on a variety of support from, including but not limited to, trade unions at
the the national and international level.
Comment 5: Land grabbing has been very rampant in Indonesia, plantations have become
industrial complexes, so people are displaced as migrant workers in other countries.
Comment 6: One problem for migrant workers is that they receive no briefing or training before
they are sent to work abroad. This affects their integration into workers’ union in their country of
destination. Preparation should not only be initiated by the government, but by the labour
organizations as well. The issues of migrant workers are more than just issues of slavery and
human trafficking. They are also issues of changing the economic paradigm. Do we have an
alternative to globalisation?
Comment 7: My first employer in Bahrain did not pay me the right wages and never on time. I
went back to the agency, which gave me a new employer. However, they didn’t give me a new
contract to sign. My new employer was still abusive. He even attempted to rape me, so I ran
away. Instead of going back to the agency, I went to the Philippine embassy, but they handed me
to the police station. The police held me in detention for 21 days. My question is, if I go to
another country to work and the same thing happens, will the government of that country help
me? In gulf countries, they often side with the employer, because he is a citizen.
Comment 8: Despite numerous cases of abuses and exploitation by employers, the government
16 | P a g e
is not compelled to act and protect these migrant workers. Export-labor policy of the Philippine
government is only after the steady flow of remittances, which contributes to the country’s GDP.
This is even institutionalized, as short courses on household work, for instance. I think the issues
of Filipino migrant workers should be resolved and addressed here in the country, not in the
countries where they go. Migration problems can only be addressed if industrialisation is
achieved.
Answer 3 (Dennis Arnold): Clearly, it is a government issue, but collective initiatives could also be
a better solution.
Answer 4 (Elizabeth Tang): Most MOUs between governments are bilateral. Even if it looks good,
the content is not disclosed. The migrant workers do not know the contents of these MOUs. We
need more multilateral agreements than bilateral ones.
How to get help in gulf countries: NGOs are making more effort to reach migrant workers. The
question is, how do we determine the workers who need access to these types of services and
assistance? For labour organisations, how do we ensure that these cases of exploitation and
abuse do not happen again?
Panel Discussion III
Presentation 7: “Informal Labour in Asia: Organising Strategies” by Nalini
Nayak
In South Asia, 94% of labour belongs to the informal sector. Of this number, 70% work in
agriculture and services sector, contributing to 60% of the GDP.
There are two primary effects of globalisation in South Asia: capital chasing cheap labour and
capital grabbing natural resources (land, water, minerals, ocean resources, forest products) –
both of which are abundant in South Asia. However, the labour movement is not looking at these
issues as it is mainly concerned with issues of employment. The labour movement should also
look at the movement of capital in a “global village”, as this can be considered as one of the
primary impetus for migration.
Presently, these forces have resulted to massive displacement of people, both in the rural areas
and urban areas. People are now moving into all kinds of self-employment, converting
17 | P a g e
themselves into cheap wage workers (street vendors, rag pickers, domestic workers, etc.) It has
also resulted to massive deterioration of the livelihoods of the informal sector, as well as massive
pollution of the environment. Other issues have also cropped up such as the feminisation of
labour, production of unhealthy food, creating wars to sustain the armament industry, etc.,
essentially focusing on the “production of death” and not on securing life.
Resistance to these forces should begin with the people asserting their rights to natural
resources, land tenure, ownership to traditional knowledge (as opposed to the appropriation of
the capitalist system of traditional knowledge), food sovereignty, and work. Organisation
strategies should also take into account the various dichotomies in labour that exist: contract
workers vs. permanent workers, local workers vs. migrant workers, and the small producers vs.
the big producers.
At SEWA, the work is primarily focused on making the following more visible: chains of
subcontracting and exploitation; workers who continue to be invisible because of the nature of
their work; and the policies that marginalise workers in the informal sector. Particular emphasis
is also given in pushing for the recognition of the different types of informal work, advocating for
legislation that promotes social protection, collectivisation of the informal labourers for strength
and survival, and alliance building.
Presentation 8: “Is the Asian Labour Movement Gender-Blind?” by Christal
Chan
The feminisation of the Asian labour force can be seen in various ways. Women workers are
segregated into particular types of occupations that have inferior working conditions compared
to jobs held by men. These roles in the workforce are basically extensions of their society’s
gender roles. While there is an increasing participation of women in the economy, this is
primarily based on exploitation and inequality. Thus, wage gaps and working conditions could
worsen as more women enter the workforce.
As marginalised workers, women labourers are in a precarious situation even within labour
organisations. Often, they are excluded from decision-making, making it difficult for them to
organise their concerns and turn it into a bargaining force. Their work is also discriminated and
undervalued. There is also very little recognition of the important role that women workers are
playing (or can play) in the labour movement. The composition and dynamics of the labour force
has changed, but the labour movement is operating as if the majority of the workers are male
18 | P a g e
and in secure factory jobs.
Several factors are considered as barriers to women workers’ participation in labour
organisations: (1) individual/person – perceived lack of confidence, skills, etc.; (2) home/family –
not much time for organisational work due to their need to rush home and take care of their
families; (3) society – perception of other people that women’s places are inside a home; (4)
trade union – if organisations don’t take women’s issues into account, why would women
labourers join?
For labour organisations where majority of the members are women, questions are also in place:
are women’s interests prioritised? Are gender-sensitive policies in place? Do they participate in
decision-making processes? Are women given the same opportunity to be elected as leaders?
In general, the Asian labour movement might have to reflect, asses, and address the following
questions: Is the Asian labour movement gender-blind? What’s the best way to be more
inclusive of women and life-sustaining issues? Should women workers form their own separate
unions, or should they try to make themselves heard using the existing structures? Are women
workers’ issues different from workers’ issues? Do promoting women workers’ issues create
disunity in the labour movement?
Questions and Comments on Panel Discussion III
Comment 1: On the matter of recognising and organising the informal sectors of labour, we must
accept that these are the weaknesses of the labour movement. We have to start looking at the
specific dimensions of these sectors, particularly in each state in India.
Comment 2: In Vietnam, we have women workers’ committees, but there is not enough effort
given in recognising women-specific concerns like raising children at the workplace, putting up
breastfeeding places, etc. This is a challenge for trade unions. We shouldn’t establish separate
women workers’ unions as this step would add additional burden to limited resources. Rather,
trade unions should be gender-balanced.
Comment 3: The idea not to create separate women’s unions is correct, for doing so would
create fragmentation. What our organisation does is hold gender-sensitivity training for men.
Comment 4: In Korea, we formed trade unions exclusive for women in 1999 because we saw it
19 | P a g e
difficult to have our voices heard in mainstream trade unions. We got a lot of flak from
mainstream trade unions as they saw it as divisive of the labour movement. But now there is
more acceptance as they have seen the benefits of these types of organisations, for example, the
lobbying of a higher minimum wage for women’s workers, which has gone well. So I don’t think
women trade unions only create conflicts. Sometimes they can infuse new or fresh agenda into
the labour movement.
Comment 5: We need labour unions not only to focus on labour rights, but also on human
(people) rights. The question is, how can labour unions also address pressing issues that are
beyond labour issues? We can improve the organisation of the informal sectors, and if we do
this, we can also address women’s issues.
Comment 6: In Malaysia, women workers, who are mainly in electronic industries, are consulted
when we write the constitution of labour unions. We put specific provisions to make sure that
women and their concerns are expressed and represented.
Comment 7: In Cambodia, there is an abundance of stories of exploitation of women workers. In
my organization, we try to work with ILO to address these problems, especially the migrant
women workers. I would like to know how to improve in addressing women’s issues in labour
unions?
Comment 8: Women plantation workers are also exploited in palm plantations in Indonesia. They
are given oil instead of cash as payment. Women are also undercompensated compared to men.
Question 1 (Hueonmi): How can we make labour unions more gender sensitive?
Answer (Nalini): The issue I am raising is actually life system and how this can be integrated into
labour movements. It is interesting to take note of how women were responsible for expressing
the concerns of the fish workers movement in India. Food fish exported was actually food that
was being traded by women, and consumed locally. But mainstream labour unions did not
recognize this, which compelled women workers to organize themselves. A valid question would
be, within the union itself, whose issues are being raised?
Question (Apo Leong): What will happen then if different sectors pull out from existing labour
unions because they think their problems are not addressed? Can’t we be more united and work
within the system to transform these labour unions?
20 | P a g e
Answer (Christal Chan): The current consensus is not for women to break away from existing
labour unions. However, recognising women’s issues in labour organisations is only possible if
the leadership of labour unions is receptive enough. So the question still remains, how do we
apply this from the top, down to the lowest level of the organisational structure?
Answer (Nalini): Life issues are more central; it is only women’s groups that have been raising
these issues more often and have been more vocal about it. Violence is there, but we only allow
it to grow, we are not doing anything about it. There are larger issues that labour movements
have to confront, and unless we address them, there will be no life for our future generations. I
am not for women putting up their own unions.
21 | P a g e
Day 2
After laying out the contemporary picture of the labour situation in Asia on the first day, the
second day focused on emerging ways in which workers have resisted the mostly oppressive
character of the current labour picture. Through case studies, the presentations examined
different forms of organising witnessed in country-, sector-, and enterprise-levels, including
building alliances across sectors and with broader social movements.
Panel Discussion IV
Presentation 9: "The Development of Collective Bargaining in China" by Chris
Chan
The presentation tried to answer the question of how collective bargaining can exist in a country
with no independent unions. He offered a way to see the evolution of collective bargaining
mechanisms since the country opened its market. He identified the stages as (1) Collective
consultation by formality (early 1990s to 2000s), (2) Collective bargaining by riot (2004 to 2008),
(3) Party state-led collective bargaining (developed after 2010 although the form has long
existed), and (4) Workers-led collective bargaining (in the future).
The first type is collective consultation by formality. The need to differentiate between the
concepts of "collective consultation" and the more traditional "collective bargaining" is unique in
socialist countries, he said. The assumption is that there is no need for bargaining of any sort
because the state will always advocate for the advancement of workers' interests. The legal
framework has existed as early as 1992 with the Trade Union Law, followed by the Labour Law in
1994 and the Labour Contract Law in 2008. To date, more than 80 percent of enterprises with
1,000 workers or more have signed a collective contract. However, it's been noted that workers
play no active role in this set-up, which still employs a top-down approach. In TNCs, freedom of
association is merely a CSR requirement.
Strikes from 2004 to 2007 marked an increase in collective bargaining by riot. Demands included
the implementation of the minimum wage, overtime pay, and social insurance. Actions were
mostly rights-based although there were also cases of interest-based strikes. Forms of struggle
include machine breaking, stoppage, and roadblocks.
22 | P a g e
Party state-led collective bargaining developed after 2010 although the set-up has been known
before. A noteworthy case, the 17-day Honda strike in May 2010 carried demands for reasonable
wages, trade union reform or reconstruction, promotion opportunities and job security. A rising
interest-based character was observed in such set-up. Forms of struggle included rallies inside
the factory estate, public speeches by leaders, and search for external support.
Like collective consultation by formality, among the challenges of this set-up are largely about
the issue of union independence. Enterprise or sectoral trade union represents workers to
negotiate with management. Union committee members are often elected under the monitor of
higher level trade unions. Examples include the Wuhan catering industry and Wenling.
Workers-led collective bargaining is said to be the future of such mechanisms in China. There are
cases in which the trade union and the party share an office in the workplace, while full-time
trade union officers used to be department heads in the enterprise.
Presentation 10: "Organising and Campaign Experiences from Domestic
Workers" by Fish Ip
The presentation painted a dire picture for domestic workers, including children and migrants,
and the kind of resistance and alliance-building that their precarious situation allows.
Domestic workers, she stressed, are usually not included in existing trade union structure. They
are mostly organised in the neighbourhood and community-level, similar to other informal
workers. These groups provide mutual help and support in a number of issues, for examples (1)
shelter and emergency help, (2) other employment, (3) domestic violence, (4) child care, (5)
emotional support, (6) credit cooperative, and (7) women knowledge sharing. Services available
to members can often be categorised under (1) skills training, (2) job placement, and (3) informal
education.
Resistance efforts are concentrated in building visibility, identity, voice, and representation.
There were also cases of alliance-building with other sectors, such as garments factory workers
in a case in Bangladesh, or migrants, as in migrant’s centres in Hong Kong. As the counterparts of
management in the case of domestic workers are individual employers, initiatives have included
launching immediate action in front of the employer's house. There are also actions that fight
discriminatory labour laws and state policy that don't classify domestic workers as workers. Due
to their precarious place, there is also a resistance within the labour movement.
23 | P a g e
Presentation 11: "Emerging Labour Resistance in South Asia" by Surendra
Pratap
While it is impossible to cover all modes of resistance in South Asia, there are certain trends that
characterize emergent labour resistance movements in the region.
The rate of unionisation and organising in South Asia depends on (1) the proportion of formal
workers in sectors and alliances between formal and informal workers; (2) industry-wide
alliances and industry-wide bargaining, as in the textile and tea industries in India and Pakistan;
(3) available space for collective bargaining in the nature of the occupation; (4) integration of
small economies; (5) sub-sector-based institutions and regulatory conditions; (6) organising
initiatives and alliances; and (7) mass organisations movements.
Major visible resistance movements include (1) industrial labour movements in formal sector, as
in freedom of association and collective bargaining; (2) labour movements in industrial-informal
sectors, as in the implementation of minimum wages and other labour standards; and (3)
workers movements against dispossession, as in agriculture and forest workers.
The Maruti-Suzuki Workers Strike of 2005 was a noteworthy case. It took place largely
independent of central trade unions, the mode of radicalisation mainly through factory
occupation. It also exemplified alliance-building, between formal and informal workers at the
regional level as well as between regular workers and families in the movement. There were also
support groups from various organisations and trade unions. Their demands included an end to
the contract labour system. As a result, 147 workers were jailed, with an additional 2,300, 546 of
them regular, terminated. Nonetheless, clear impacts of the action included wage revision and
the institution of a regularisation policy for informal workers.
Another case study presented was the garments industry in Bangladesh. Despite being the
country's most important sector in manufacturing in terms of employment and export, workers
suffered from low wages, fire accidents, and long hours of work. Industry-wide mass actions
mainly demanded for the implementation of a minimum wage.
The Pakistan textile industry was a similar case. The small number of workers, all casual, was paid
per unit. All workers were organised by LQM. The 2008 strike lasted for four days and
participated in by 50,000 workers. The power loom owners opened fire at the ranks of
24 | P a g e
protesters, injuring nine all in all. The Faisalabad strike of 2010, meanwhile, coincided with
unrest after subsidies on gas and electricity were withdrawn. There were large-scale repression,
including long sentences for six leaders of the movement.
Mass movements of tribal workers also constituted an emerging form of resistance. Their issues
included land rights and the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Tribal fairs, and other
socio-cultural-political actions, intended to raise political consciousness and visibility. In one
case, the issue of sexual harassment of migrating construction workers led to a movement
against contractors and advocating a system to protect migrant workers. Solidarity among
various organisations was formed to oppose land-grabbing, including five groups in Odisha.
Presentation 12: "Labour Protests in Southeast Asia" by Fahmi Panimbang
The Global Rights Index identifies the region as among the world's worst to work in. In the lowest
rung--no guarantee of rights--are Cambodia, Malaysia, Laos, and the Philippines, while there are
systemic violations in Indonesia, Thailand, and Myanmar. Corresponding modes of resistance
have differed, from hunger strikes in Cambodia workers going amok in Malaysia and factory raids
in Indonesia.
After street protests and factory raids, the hunger strike of Walmart and H&M workers in
Cambodia in 2013 represented a new trend in labour resistance in how the workers targeted
brands instead of government. This may signify the increasing power of TNCs over states,
evident in the ballooning profits corporations, pegged at $160 trillion in 2010 (more than a
quarter of world’s GDP!).
In 2014, 800 migrant Nepalese factory workers "went amok" and set fire to the manufacturing
plant where they work after stoning their employers' office and burning down a car. There were
also factory raids in Indonesia, particularly in the densely populated Bekasi Industrial Zones.
Actions were mostly spontaneous and involved hundreds of thousands of workers in one
industrial zone. As the zone is heavily interconnected, blocking one road could disrupt the
operations of the entire area. There were more than 100 factory raids in a two-year period
(2012-2013), mostly in protest against illegal practice of contractual-work status and
implementation of pertinent laws. As a result, more than 60,000 workers were regularised. Even
so, there was backlash from employers, including repression, issuance of protective certificates
by the government, and soft terrorism.
25 | P a g e
Questions and comments on Panel Discussion IV
Question: What do labour laws mean when theory is vastly different from reality?
Answer: (Chris Chan) Things are changing. Some NGOs were formed in Guangdong. Their role in
the resistance has become more significant since 2010. There are lawyers, students, and others
who have begun to engage social issues, such as workers' rights, and protesting. In the Honda
case, many scholars wrote to the government and the trade union. Forms of external support
are now more common. People are now more confident in supporting workers' struggle even as
challenges remain, like cases of activists are being arrested. The political spaces for NGO have
become much constrained after the new leadership in 2012 but at the same time they are more
confident.
Question: (from several people) Why use "riot" in describing a stage in collective bargaining in
China? Doesn't the term connote chaos and may undermine the action? Isn't "strike" better?
Also, while there are a lot of commonalities between China and Vietnam's set-up, there is no
external support in the case of Vietnam. Strikes appear to be perfunctory in nature, as it is
normal for enterprises to just wait for strikes to raise the minimum wage. There are regular
dialogues every three months in the workplace instead of state-led collective bargaining. It's the
responsibility of management and workers to talk to each other, facilitated by upper-level trade
union.
Answer: (Chris Chan) "Riot" historically used to refer to actions in early 19th century England
before labour unions. There are similarities between that usage and China's situation today. Is it
better to call them strikes? Some of the cases between 2004 and 2007 are more than strikes. A
manager was killed in one action, in addition to other unlawful acts.
The similarities between China and Vietnam are because of the legal framework. The labour law
is perfect on paper. China also tried to institute new laws in certain provinces regarding
collective bargaining after the 2010 strike. A Democratic Management Regulation was approved
in 2008 for Guangdong.
Question: What about replicating migrants centres in different countries?
Answer: (Fish Ip) The proposal to put up a migrants centre is already happening, though not in a
big scale, as in Indonesian migrants in the Netherlands. There should be emphasis on sharing and
communication across networks to build campaign actions together. Some of the challenges are
26 | P a g e
on the language barrier and unstable Internet. A communication network of IDWF is to be
launched in December.
Question: Is there no resistance outside the wage sector and attempts to align the labour
movement with broader social struggles?
Answer: (Fahmi) we’re trying to achieve cross-sector struggles. What is the place of the labour
movement in the broader social struggle? What are possible inter-peoples' solidarity linkages?
We have to consider that the labour movement is a tiny part in Asia. In Indonesia, regional
alliances are the backbone of the general strike, not the central union.
Comment: The large spectrum of ideology in alliances is very wide indeed but it doesn't matter.
The general strike is still driven from the top-down.
Comment: Maybe there is a need for a reconfiguration of public understanding of workers'
situation? Will language politics come into play here? Is there a need for translation?
Question: Labour resistance seems to generally be directed against capitalism. Is there any
evidence that the resistance will be directed against capitalism itself?
Answer: (Chris Chan) A lot of the struggles are economic in nature. No anti-capitalism messages
at the moment.
(Surendra) The undercurrents are there. It may take time.
Group Discussion I: Building Alliances and Networks at Grassroots
The second half of the day was devoted to small group discussions. The guide questions were:
1. What have you learned from the panel discussion this morning? Tell the group one thing you
have learned.
2. In your experience, how are alliances formed? How and why have they succeeded or failed?
3. Draw from the experiences shared in your group. Name five key messages for yourselves in
building alliances / network at the grassroots level.
In the presentation, the groups were asked to identify their answers for number 3:
27 | P a g e
Report from each Group
Group 1:
Alliance building needs good agenda-setting. How can we make issue-based alliances
more sustainable? How can we sustain a critical mass after that fight for a certain cause?
Awareness building particularly among women
Compromise
Having an international forum to raise different issues. Labour rights have no borders.
Campaign against agencies of migrant workers
Group 2:
Effective communication system
Resource sharing
Open your heart (building mutual support) toward an ecology of the labour movement
Democratic process is building alliance and decision-making process (not dominance and
dependence on sole organisation and effective mechanism to avoid and solve conflicts)
Sustainability of alliance
International platform
Group 3:
Grassroots awareness is important and a starting point to bring people in.
Participation with understanding. There should be a consensus on a common goal.
Provide members an opportunity to connect together through networking and shared
activities.
Build alliances beyond local level so members will feel solidarity beyond local level.
Define opponent. Not just state and employers but middle structures, such as heads and
trade union leaders.
Group 4:
Support each other.
Common principles should be the priority to avoid short-term alliances.
Commitment to fulfill your responsibilities in the alliance
Communication within the alliance
Recognition in terms of migrant workers' issues, such as Korean society needing to
28 | P a g e
recognise migrants as part of society
Group 5
Alliance should be inclusive. Unions from extreme right to left, traditional to radical.
Alliance should be multi-sectoral. Workers' issues connected to broader issues.
Openness to learn from each other’s experiences (unions reaching out to unions and
building an alliance).
Unity as a practical strategy. Building unity within an industry to be able to support
workers' movement.
Persistent perception and consensus-building amid the constant misunderstanding.
Group 6
The group presented their answers to questions 1 and 3:
Question 1
Most important is workers' solidarity whether you are fighting for democracy, collective
bargaining, and minimum wage.
Different forms of organising and mass actions but it can succeed or fail even if you have
mass actions. It is not enough.
Demonstrations of domestic workers outside the house of their employers unlike in other
countries where they just file a complaint.
Global capitalism fragments the action of labour movement from laws to informalisation,
so trade unions must respond more "flexibly" and has to be more dynamic.
Response of state and capital to workers' resistance differ from country to country.
Workers' labour movement should prepare for future setbacks.
Level of militancy is escalating with similar forms. There should be more dialogue,
address more issues of policy reform in the economic system.
Question 3
Bring workers' issues to the public discourse.
Issues addressed must be relevant to all
Members of alliances should share responsibilities and resources.
Any alliances must have a core group.
Alliance should be open. Process of joining and quitting should be easy.
29 | P a g e
Day 3
After mapping the labour movement in Asia and the emerging forms of resistance, the third day
focused on the future. Dae-oup Chang historicised the labour movement and the models bourne
out of Europe's experience in order to ask questions about the future of Asian labour. Samuel Li
Shing used the recent popular movement in Hong Kong to illustrate the relationship between
politics, economics, and labour. Joy Hernandez presented case studies of plantation and mining
workers as "stories of dispossession," contextualised in broader issues of land and human rights.
Finally, small group discussions focused on "visions of social transformation," in particular
proposals for an Asian Labour School.
Panel Discussion V
Presentation 13: "Rethinking the (Asian) Labour Movement" by Dae-Oup
Chang
Dae-Oup Chang began his presentation by asking which aspects of the labour movement deserve
rethinking today. Everything, he stressed: (1) whose movement is it? (2) For whom does it exist?
(3) What are its aims? (4) How does it achieve such aims? (5) What organisational form does it
take? (6) What are our models? Are they right or wrong? Better or worse?
He then historicised the labour movement in the West and defining key principles in its
inception. Unions, he pointed out, had pursued alternatives to increasingly dominant capitalist
social relations, market, commodities, private property, and anti-labour state. Collective
bargaining was not its main function at all, but rather building a community and creating a
common democracy for society. The usual "steps" in its evolution had been from (1) workers to
(2) unions to (3) parties to (4) state to (5) social transformation.
What happened during the "great" transformation of the labour movement was, after electoral
success, workers' parties became the managers of state but stopped short of moving toward
radical democratisation of society, losing its transformative dimension. Instead, it was a common
trend that unions got out of politics, and the tripartite system became the dominant mode of
engagement. There was also a de-politicisation of the concept of class and class-based
movement. Class lost its political dimension and became economic interest-based. As unions
retreated to factories, they became organisations for bargaining. The forward march stopped, no
30 | P a g e
longer was the labour movement expanding to broader society, including its interrogation of
capitalist exploitation.
The so-called golden days of the labour movement from the 1950s to the 1960s was precipitated
by the largest capitalist boom from 1945 to late 1960s. There was a consensus between union
and capital, mediated by state, toward better productivity and wealth distributions. The world
witnessed the emergence of "standard" or "formal" labour, which resulted in labour laws and
standards.
In Asia, the labour movement emerged from anti-colonial movements. It was concentrated in
sectors and regions that had been significant to the colonial economies, like port cities, industrial
hubs, mining sites, plantations, railways, and trams. Organised labour became the most
established modern social organisation in nearly all countries, like Indonesia (five million), Korea
(500,000), Japan (60 percent union density post-WWII), Thailand, China, and India.
The labour movements in many countries were defeated by locally grown capital with strong
support from right-wing military and Cold War geo-politics. Their suppression by military
regimes, as in Korea, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand, or integration into state and
capital, as in China, or a corporatist system, as in Japan, spelled doom for most. However, they
re-emerged in the 1980s, with vehement struggles in South Korea and the Philippines for
democratisation inspiring a new theory. There was also an autonomous workers' movement in
China, which soon faced a neoliberal offensive of global scale, cultivating exploitative practices.
With the ascent of the neoliberal path of development, Asia became the workshop of the world
as well as the biggest emerging market. Capitalist labour became the common substance of life.
Survival depends upon capitalist labour one way or another in both rural and urban life. There is
no longer any purely peasant economy. But while there was increase in standard formal labour
in the West, in Asia, there was no expansion of standard capitalist employment relations in the
traditional sense. Rather, what we saw was an increase in labour population with increasing
informality and insecurity. Unions an political parties had been unable to address this condition.
For Asia, therefore, should the course of action for the labour movement be the "usual" steps? It
should be noted that the European model is based upon the experience of a small segment of
the population. The so-called "golden days" were enjoyed by male industrial workers. The
Western experience is thus a peculiar model. For the Asian labour movement to abide by it is like
looking at a chronological evolution of the labour movement that isn't productive.
31 | P a g e
The need, Dae-Oup said, is to focus on the real standard form of labour in Asia--move from
exclusion to inclusion, from citizens to working class then migrants, from production to
reproduction, from party politics to people's politics. Collective bargaining should means to the
build common democracy and not just the end of struggle. There is a need to develop a strategy
based on careful studies of our own experience in Asia, Latin America, and Africa.
Presentation 14: "Democracy, Occupy Movement, and Grassroots Movement in
Hong Kong" by Samuel Li Shing-Hong
How should labour participate in a democracy? Would it be in a grassroots movement? What is
the relationship between politics, economics, and labour? The fight that is taking place in Hong
Kong is a case of David vs. Goliath. The movement's chief demand is universal suffrage for the
chief executive election for the head of Hong Kong's executive branch without the intervention
of the Chinese communist party. The actions of the largely student-led strike included breaking
into government offices amid police repression. Some 100,000 people came out. It was also the
first strike called by the trade union since the 1997 handover, although it should be noted that
participants were mostly from the bureaucracy, the middle class, and not from the grassroots.
The dialogue failed.
The actions, which included the strike, unlawful assembly, highway blockades, and direct
confrontation, went against common perceptions that Hong Kong people are mild. It offered a
new way to look at Hong Kong identity after decolonisation, as a process of getting back political
and economic power.
Hong Kong identity had traditionally been associated with favouring a neoliberal economy,
nationalistic but depoliticised, favouring economic power but not political power. In the ongoing
transformation of identity, we are starting to see fairness, localisation of identity, and increasing
civil rights consciousness. Class consciousness, however, remains nowhere in the equation.
Notable demographic information of strike participants and support include: 85 percent are
students, white collar workers, and self-employed; 55 percent have university-level degrees or
above; and 85 percent are younger than 35. Majority of the support come from the middle class,
while those with lower education tended not to support the movement.
What is needed? Political and economic struggle is a long-term and should be a sustainable
process. Organising is key, to begin in communities. An alliance needs strong grassroots
32 | P a g e
membership base to gain legitimacy.
In the meantime, there is a need to connect the political and capitalist discourse because they
are related. The political state in Hong Kong is in favour of capitalism, with basic laws putting the
capitalist system and way of life as priority. In the parliament, 25 percent of seats are allotted for
business, with four percent left to labour, often to state and yellow unions. Legislations like the
minimum wage, maximum working hours, competition law, and universal retirement protection,
are routinely defeated. Welfare is used as merely a tool to relieve the anger of people, to
disguise the fact that the economic growth was occurring alongside increasing wealth gaps.
Popular grassroots movements in recent years include the right of abode movements, anti-
World Trade Organisation demonstrations, construction workers' strike, anti-high speed railway
campaign, dock workers' strike, as well as the minimum wage and pension campaigns.
In addition, there is fragmentation in the labour movement. How to unite workers, then? Labour
is impacted the most by unfair political and economic structures, as well as the coalition
between politicians and capitalists. Even so, the struggle is supported mostly by the middle class
and educated people. Where does the disconnect lie?
Presentation 15: "Stories of Dispossession in Plantation and Mining
Communities in the Philippines: Challenges of reclaiming rights and dignity"
by Joy Hernandez
The CARAGA Region in southern Philippines is one of the poorest in the country, with 31.9
percent of the population living below the poverty line. It's been ravaged by relentless
enterprises keen to take advantage of its rich natural resources like mining, logging, and palm oil
plantations.
Case study 1: Agusan Plantation, Inc. Established in 1983, 1,815 hectares, of mixed Singaporean
and Filipino ownership. Wages range from the mandated minimum of P258 (US$5.73) for daily
workers to as low as P.35 (US$ .008) for rat bat makers, who are often women. This wage
payment system and exploitative hiring system are able to persist because of union-busting.
One protest, demanding for regularisation of workers and higher wages, coincided with Typhoon
Pablo. The company closed down temporarily in May 2014, ostensibly due to losses from the
typhoon, but when it resumed operations, some of the old workers, especially union members,
were not hired. Other issues include safety concerns, as in skin discolourisation among workers
33 | P a g e
because of the use of pesticides, child labour, and widespread fear. There is also a peculiar
recruitment arrangement in place in which a random person is tasked to hire groups of people in
exchange for 10 percent commissions and being subjected to group-guaranteed loans.
Case study 2: Filipinas Palm Oil Plantation, Inc. 8,429 hectares, of mixed Filipino and Indonesian
ownership. Covered by the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program. When the agrarian reform
beneficiaries were formed into a cooperative, they entered into a lease-back agreement with the
corporation from 1988 to 2007 at a fixed lease rate rental of P635 (US$14) per hectare for year.
The contract was renewed for another 25 years through duplicitous means. Conditions somehow
improved after the takeover by the cooperative. Income of harvester now takes into account the
distance from a flat rate of P6 per fruit brunch. From an annual take-home of P5,000 from profit-
sharing schemes, it has now increased to P7,000 per quarter.
Case study 3: Brown Plantation. Established in 2011 after the company secured a permit from
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Noted for their violation of ancestral
domain and human rights of the indigenous Higaonon tribe, who were forcibly and violently
evicted from their homes. Since they live in nature, it eroded their traditions and way of life and
bred a culture of warlordism. There were also killings of tribal leaders and trumped up charges
for those opposing the company.
Case study 4: Mining in the region has also destroyed the local way of life aside from rampant
informalisation. There is no regularisation for workers, who earn above the minimum wage but
whose work is seasonal. In particular, women street sweepers suffer greatly. Mining has
rendered other forms of livelihood obsolete, such as farming and fishing. Even water for
everyday use has become inaccessible because of pollution.
In the wake of these destructions, should the labour movement struggle for compliance with
labour standards, higher wages, and social protection? With peoples' very of life threatened, the
struggle should be against dispossession and beyond labour rights.
Questions and Comments on Panel Discussion V
Question: In Hong Kong, why are the poor not revolting?
Answer: (Elizabeth) The poor in Hong Kong has always been resisting. Strikes have been
organised by workers. No people's movement can come out of nothing. In the meantime, a lot of
34 | P a g e
educating people is taking place. Students are not separate from the working class, objectively
speaking. Trade unions play a very important role in building alliances and coalitions.
(Samuel) The Umbrella Movement can be traced back to 40 years ago, in the colonial movement
in Hong Kong. Citizenship is not necessarily contradictory to working class consciousness.
Question: Should trade unions affiliate with parties or create their own?
Answer: (Dae-Oup) Unions create parties when they think they can. Electoral democracy is
double-edged. You participate in it but it treats all citizens as the same despite class differences.
But it can be used as a tool. As in the Chilean case in 1973, they built the trade union, the
political party, which didn't lose its ties with the unions and worked toward social
transformation. Let the party choose you because you're strong, not the other way around.
Question: How can migrant workers organise?
Answer: (Dae-Oup) For migrant workers, integrate in local work-based unions or create their
own. But because they earn the minimum wage, it's important to bargain at a society level,
direct action to state authority. There is schizophrenia in the capitalist system. The working class
is represented as citizens, but citizenship can destroy working class identity.
Question: How do you define the standard for of labour in Asia? How do we redefine
democracy? Whose freedom are we talking about In the case of Joy's presentation, plantation
already existed from colonial times and is now integrated in a global agro-business industry.
Monsanto, which controls food seeds of the world, conducts the biggest research studies in
universities. There is a link in agro-industrial business, from killing you to controlling your food.
Answer: (Dae-Oup) On a conceptual level, classes of labour rely upon the capitalist system,
directly or indirectly. Politics always attend the standard form of labour. It did not stay inside the
factory and instead spread across society. The condition that we have in Asia is different from
1950s and 1960s Europe.
Also, the standard and golden age of labour movements primarily concerned men in
industrialised countries and Japan. Women and immigrants, who have been doing precarious
work, are left out. Why is the same model being used then in Asia despite the long feminizisation
of industries like garments?
35 | P a g e
(Joy) It's primarily an issue of land. In the Philippines, there are many instances of plantation land
being covered by land reform but the new owners would just become workers of plantation
companies again. There are schemes to take advantage of loopholes in the law and sometimes
deceit on the part of employers, like in the renewal of the lease in API.
Question: In Vietnam, should we rethink the identity of working class in terms of alliance with
private sub-contracting enterprises?
Answer: (Dae-Oup) Only if the working class wants to. If we go by the step-by-step theory of
revolution, the idea of aligning with the national bourgeoisie is not a new idea. The point is to
slowly radicalise the national bourgeoisie. But 99 percent of the case resulted to the
subordination of the working class to the national bourgeoisie. It's like subjecting the labour
movement into inter-capital competition.
Question: Can you elaborate on the Chilean case?
Answer: (Dae-Oup) Chile's case is an example of pursuing the model to the extreme while all
others have given up at a certain point. Victory in the elections was utilised to genuinely pursue
more radical democracy. But after the failure, they became a neo-liberal movement. There was
nationalisation of industries, like the copper mines, which make up 50 percent of its exports. It
also instituted welfare rather than invest the gains from its nationalised industries.
Comment: (Apo) We were also baptised by colonial trade unionism. There was a time when
union leaders were being sent to the UK, during the Cold War. How do we judge KCTU then? Is
this the model we aspire? Brazil? Polish? China? Singapore? We must be critical of these models.
Question: The grassroots are so underprivileged. What causes their fragmentation and
reluctance to support the movement? Are they culturally more obedient? Peaceful? Is it an
economic necessity?
Answer: (Dae-Oup) Often, the working class is used as statistical method. We need to
understand the working class as an experience, as a process. We have to rely upon communal
experiences as an alternative to the market. Today, we are working class at the workplace but
individuals at home. We must enjoy things together. The identity of the working class is an
alternative to what exists in the market today.
Question: Which to prioritise?
36 | P a g e
Answer: (Dae-Oup) There must be focus on sectors that can cost the maximum harm on the
basic foundation of capitalist system. What happens is, when trade unions achieve success, the
top layer of the working class becomes detached from other sectors, like women and migrants.
In the case of female-dominated but male-led sectors, drive away the male leaders. Transition to
female leadership.
Answer: (Joy) In the examples I presented, it's difficult. Like in the mining communities,
everything has been destroyed. There are no other alternatives. So if you demand better rights,
at least you have social protection, regularisation. In plantations, it is really land. The bigger
challenge is the context in which it operates. Militarisation in the countryside. Those who are
organised are threatened and harassed.
Sanjiv Pandita wrapped up the discussion by situating it in the larger purview of the struggle for
social transformation, laid out by Dae-Oup. How do we go about the transformative process? If
plantation companies have stolen our life of dignity that had existed from the pre-colonial times?
He stressed that some mechanisms have linked workers to the system. Agreeing to collective
bargaining, however, keeps the system alive. Can we live without palm oil? Can we organise to
fight Walmart and not just organise Walmart workers? Engaging the system, he said, can make
us fall into the trap of supporting the system.
Group Discussion II: Vision on Labour Movement in Asia and its Challenges
The small group discussions revolved around ideas for social transformation in labour
movements in Asia.
Report from each Group (Question 1: "What is the vision of social
transformation shared by labour movements in Asia?")
Group 1
All the rights of workers
No capitalisation
Socialism
The working class as the ruling party
37 | P a g e
Group 2
For Bangladesh: influence policy to become friendly to workers
For the Philippines: formulation of united political and economic alliance; laws in accordance
with ILO standards, implementation; building up of a common platform to protect the rights
of labour
Grassroots people and organisations involved in policy decision making
Policy and government being accountable to workers
Human dignity
Group 3
Collective struggle for full respect for human rights, including women
Society seeing the value of domestic work
Decent wages for all workers as well as non-economic benefits
Democratic participation from other sectors to push government
Just and fair society where work is valued
Eliminate wage exploitation, wealth distributed according to need
Group 4
Building political power of labour at every level of society and sector
Building peoples' economy and peoples' control of the economy--collective economy
Democratising society and the working class movement; equality among people, elimination
of the gap between rich and poor
As the working class is highly diverse, we should find a way to deal with the diversity; focus
on understanding each other toward a non-hierarchical society in terms of gender, race,
ethnicity, etc., among nations
Social transformation in the long-term
A life-centered society, rather than an exploitative work-centered society
Working class liberated from exploitation, must be aligned with other sectors of society
Group 5
Relations between people, between men and women are free from exploitation; justice and
38 | P a g e
equality for all
Relations between human and nature, harmony, giving time for nature reproduce instead of
intervening with the natural system with technology
Alternative production and consumption systems, a production regime based on use and not
for profit; social equity, decent jobs with dignity, human rights; transcending liberal
individualistic concept of human rights; sustainable democratic economy; radical democracy
plus communalisation of necessary industry on the basis of need plus welfare for all
Going beyond political advocacy, pursuing economic alternatives while pursuing political
economies
Struggles need to include construction of alternatives
Group 6
Labour movement developing innovative vision or doing something new
Workers' livelihood can get better and better off with lower inequality among the rich and
the poor
Alliance-building and raise awareness toward decent work and sustainable livelihood
Protection and promotion of workers' rights as well as human rights
Report from each Group (Question 2: "What are the challenges to the labour
movements in Asia?")
Group 1
Globalisation, privatisation, mechanisation
The political party
Mass media
Some labour movements
Value of people
Group 2
Labour mobility, migration, precarious work
No recognition from state as workers
Fragmentation in ideologies
39 | P a g e
Horizontal linkage between workers
Political interference
Leadership, building up of a second line of leadership
Gender participation and leadership
Lack of freedom of association, unprotected by legal framework
Group 3
Non-implementation of labour laws
Lack of time to organise
Non-inclusion of domestic workers in trade unions
Repression from government, profit-centered character of government
Stigma against trade unions
Lack of focus on other sectors
Fear of organising
Difficult fight against TNCs
Collusion between state and capital
Group 4
Economy is global but labour movements tend to be national or local
Working class is geographically dispersed, within value chains
Class fragmentation
Caste and religious-based divisions among working class, political divisions among workers'
movements
Lack of ideological understanding that reinforces divisions
Group 5
Protest against being inclusive
Dictatorship of number
Not questioning the march of modern science and technology
Lack of real alliances
Lack of transformative plan and collective initiative
Lack of attempts to construct alternatives that bears new possibilities in the future
Lack of education regarding alternative economies
40 | P a g e
Group 6
Military suppression, as in Cambodia
Political suppression and lack of core labour rights like freedom of association and collective
bargaining
Lack of financial independence, or dependence on foreign funding, and low or unsustainable
due-paying membership
Lack of vision for the labour movement
Lack of vision on political transformation
Wage discrepancy as in Korea
Economic recession
Wage gap within union membership
Group Discussion III: Solidarity Building
Another small group discussion focused on coalition building. Groups were asked to identify
solidarity actions at the regional level and issues that we can undertake as a campaign, advocacy,
etc. In addition, name country and regional level issues, which can be addressed through
initiatives that may fall under labour education, labour research, organising, network and alliance
building, and advocacy campaign.
Report from each group
Group 1
In China, an issue is occupational safety and health; in Hong Kong, working hours; in the
Philippines, flexibilisation, freedom of association, violence against unions; in Cambodia and
India, minimum living wage; for India, national legislation and enforcement of the ILO
Convention on Domestic Workers.
Their recommendations include strengthening existing alliance and network at national and
regional levels; exchange programs; and learning best practices from partners
41 | P a g e
Group 2
National issues include low minimum wage, labour flexibilisation, trade union rights, lack of
awareness among workers of their rights, enforcement of newly passed law on domestic
workers in the Philippines, the implementation of law in Hong Kong, and building genuine
democracy
Regional issues include living wage to build worker awareness and importance of direct
collective action; a regional labour education program designed for workers to question
exploitative practices, which should include formal and informal workers, with educational
modules highlighting experiences to stress that it's a systemic problem
In terms of process, the group recommends assembling a political working group composed
of elected leaders of mass organisations to lay out the formal of the curriculum of the
political education and the implementation plan; a technical working group will then fill in
the campaign to design proposal in more detail; to start in 2015, with resources seen to
mostly be in the form of people's time, especially regarding translation
Group 3
National issues include organising migrant workers, especially domestic workers; researches
on social protection of informal workers and migrant workers in all countries
Regional campaign may include networking among sending countries, such as India,
Cambodia, the Philippines, Bangladesh, and Vietnam, and receiving countries, like Hong
Kong, Malaysia, and South Korea; strengthening platform to advocate social protection;
regional researches on migrant workers; advocacy on rectification of the ILO Convention and
bilateral trade agreements
Group 4
In a globalised system of contemporary capitalism, inter-regional solidarity is not an
additional requirement but an integral part. We need to address the thinking of trade unions
and peoples' movements that regional solidarity is merely an additional requirement.
The labour school to promote inter-regional collaboration, to problematise the multiple
dimension of labour as subordinated under the bigger system of capitalism; curricular
development.
42 | P a g e
Group 5
National issues include minimum wage for all
Solidarity education, the need for labour education so workers will understand why it's
needed, and what level is exploitative, a balance between different kinds of workers; also a
campaign for legal reform
Regional issues include minimum wage for all and land grabbing
Their recommendations are building alliances between trade unions and civil societies,
including those who need care, such as mothers' association and students, as well as
alliances among all trade union centers
Comments and recommendations
Need for a needs-based assessment and inputs beforehand to tailor-fit the sessions;
resources, like hand-outs and materials, should also be made available beforehand so
attendees do not come empty-handed
More focused panels depending on region and level of expertise
A seeming tilt toward the formal sector
Different needs between grassroots organisers and strategic planners in terms of knowledge
and sharing of experiences, a distinction between academics and practitioners
Suggestion to add a session on health and safety issues for migrant workers
Suggestion to conduct an international-level solidarity-building workshop
Sanjiv once again wrapped up the discussions by disabusing participants of the difference
between the theoretical and the practical. He related an anecdote about a group of Scottish
workers who were complaining of their inability to find jobs despite advanced degrees. A group
of Cambodians, seeing the lush green countryside, asked the Scotts why they wouldn't use the
land. We have been detached from land for so long, and it is not theoretical. In a system, he said,
when our lives are being consumed, how do we look outside it? What is the alternative?
Alternatives should come from the everyday. Our forefathers had their lives under their control.
And so, if we're discussing about minimum wage, must we continue with this discussion or must
we look ahead, he asked. Must we engage and work within the system or think of an alternative?
If I want a life independent of corporations, to wake up happy and not be burdened by the need
to work, how can we make a society that makes that possible?
***
43 | P a g e
List of Participants
Country Organisation Participant
Bangladesh Bangladesh Occupational Safety Health
and Environment Foundation (OSHE)
1. Saki Rizwana
Domestic Workers Rights Network (DWRN)
/ Bangladesh Institute of Labour Studies
(BILS)
2. Mohammad Nazrul
Islam
Law Life Culture 3. Md. Rezaur Rahman
Cambodia Cambodian Labor Confederation 4. Sun Ly Hov
Cambodian Food and Service Workers'
Federation (CFSWF)
5. Umken Kanhasophary
Cambodia Domestic Workers Network
(CDWN)
6. Chum Chamm
Hong Kong City University of Hong Kong 7. Chris King Chi Chan
Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions
(HKCTU)
8. LAU Sin-nga
Hong Kong Federation of Asian Domestic
Workers Unions (FADWU)
9. Cheung Yin Foon
India
Centre for Workers Education (CWE) 10. Surendra Pratap Upadhyay
Self Employed Women’s Association (SEWA)
11. Kavita Malviya 12. Nalini Nayak
National Domestic Workers Movement (NDWM)
13. Clarammal Panipitchai
Indonesia Konfederasi Pergerakan Rakyat Indonesia/Confederation of Indonesian People's Movement
14. Anwar Maruf
National Union Confederation (Konfederasi Serikat Nasional – KSN)
15. Nuzulun Ni’mah
Federation of Independent Trade Unions (Gabungan Serikat Buruh Independen-GSBI)
16. Erna Wati
44 | P a g e
Sedane Labor Resource Center (Lembaga Informasi Perburuhan Sedane – LIPS)
17. Abu Mufakhir
Malaysia
Electronic Industry Employees Union Western Region (EIEUWR)
18. Saharuddin Adnan
Netherlands University of Amsterdam 19. Dennis Arnold Pakistan
Pakistan Institute of Labour Education & Research
20. Zeenia Shaukat
Philippines
Ecumenical Institute for Labor Education and Research, Inc. (EILER)
21. Anna Leah Escresa
Labor Education and Research Network (LEARN)
22. Jennifer Auria C. Albano
Sentro ng mga Nagkakaisa at Progresibong Manggagawa (SENTRO)
23. Novelita Polisoc 24. Christine V. Arevalo 25. Himaya Montenegro
Center for Trade Union and Human Rights (CTUHR)
26. Daisy Arago 27. Jane Siwa
South Korea
Research Institute for Alternative Workers' Movement
28. Cho, Eun-seok
National House Managers’ Cooperatives (NHMC)
29. Changsoon Yeom 30. Peng
United Kingdom SOAS. University of London 31. Dae-Oup Chang United States of America
International Union League for Brand Responsibility
32. Liana Dalton
Vietnam
Center for Industrial Relations Development
33. Chau Quoc Hung
Organizers
Asia Monitor Resource Centre (AMRC) 34. Sanjiv Pandita 35. Fahmi Panimbang 36. Samuel Li Shing
Hong 37. Christal Chan 38. Joy Hernandez 39. Apo Leong
International Domestic Worekrs Federatrion (IDWF)
40. Elizabeth Tang 41. Fish Ip
School of Labor and Industrial Relations University of the Philippines (UP SOLAIR)
42. Jonathan Sale 43. Rene Ofreneo 44. Melisa Serrano
Logistics 45. Wendy Dunasco Documentation and minute taker 46. Glenn Diaz