Transcript
  • 1

    AnalysisofMagnitudevs.MercalliEffectivenessinMeasuringDamageofMajorEarthquake

    EventsinContextofGlobalEconomy

    AlexisVoeltner&VictorTruongAbstract

    Earthquakescancausehugeamountsofdamagetocities.Thisstudywillexplorethe

    relationshipbetweenanearthquakesmagnitudeandtheamountofdamageitdeals.Thereare

    manyotherfactorstoconsiderwhentryingtodeterminehowmuchdamageanearthquakewill

    cause,includingthelevelofinfrastructure,development,populationdensityandgeologyofa

    region.Thestudywilllookattenearthquakesfromdifferentcountriesaroundtheworld

    representingdifferentlevelsofdevelopmentandwealth.UsingArcmaptocreatechoropleth

    mapstoshowcontrastbetweenareaswithdifferentpopulation,wealthanddevelopment,the

    studyfoundthatareaswithmoredevelopedinfrastructureandwealthsufferedahighercostin

    damagesbutasubstantiallyloweramountofdeathsandinjuries.Inreverse,areaswithlow

    developmenttendedtosustainlessdamagesfinanciallybutinsteadsufferedahugedeathtoll.

    Thisstudywillshedsomelightonhowdifferentregionsintheworldwillbeimpactedby

    earthquakes.Thestudyconcludedthatthereiscorrelationbetweenanearthquakesmagnitude

    andthedamageitdoestocitiesnearbybuttheMercalliindexisamuchbetterindicationofthe

    amountofdamagedealt.

  • 2

    Introduction

    Earthquakescanbeoneofthemostdevastatingandcostlynaturaldisasters.In2010

    alone,25earthquakescaused226,735fatalities,7.2millionvictimsand$46.2billionofdamages

    (Guha,2010).Thepurposeofthisstudywastofindouthowstrongofarelationshipexists

    betweenanearthquake'smagnitude,mercallirating,andregionaleconomytotheactualdamage

    done.Populationdensity,wealthanddevelopmentofanareawereallkeyfactorsinthis

    correlation.

    TheRichterscaleisthewellknownandcommonlyusedtowayexpresstheenergy

    releasedfromanearthquakeevent.TheRichterScaleisnotintendedtoexpressdamagedone.

    Anearthquakeinadenselypopulatedareawhichresultsinmanydeathsandconsiderable

    damagemayhavethesamemagnitudeasashockinaremoteareathatdoesnothingmorethan

    frightenthewildlife(Bellis,2015).However,becauseofitswideacceptance,highermagnitudes

    areoftenassociatedwithmoredamage,evenifthisisnotthecase.TheMercalliscaleisa

    classificationofintensitythattakesintoaccountthelevelofshakingobservedbypeopleand

    includesanintensityderiveddamagescaleinitsmeasurements.Peoplewhoexperiencean

  • 3

    earthquakecangoonlineandshareinformationaboutitseffectstohelpcreateamapofshaking

    intensitiesanddamagecalled,CommunityInternetIntensityMaps(USGS,2005).However,

    becauseofthesubjectivityoftheseobservations,theintensitygiventoanearthquakeandthe

    actualdamagedonemaynotbethesame.

    Theexpectedresultsarethatthemagnitudewillbeaninaccuraterepresentationofthe

    intensityofearthquakesbecauseitdoesnottakeintoaccountthevariabilityofpreparednessin

    differentcommunities.Sensitive,lowerGDPcommunitieswillfeeltheeffectsofanearthquake

    withgreaterintensitythanmorepreparedcommunitiesandthedamagewillthereforebe

    underrepresentedbythemagnitude.ItisexpectedthattheMercalliIndexwillbemoreaccuratea

    representation,butmaypossessinaccuraciesaswell,duetosubjectivemeasurementtechniques.

    Methods

    ThisstudyusedearthquakedatawithbothRichterScalemagnitudesandMercalliindex

    ratingsforearthquakesthatoccurredfrom1970to2002.Thedataalsoincludednumberof

    deaths,injuriesandcostofstructuraldamagesinmillionsofdollars.Itwasdecidedthatonly

    earthquakeswithamagnitudeof4orhigherwillbeconsideredinthisstudybecauselow

    magnitudeearthquakesdonottypicallycausesignificantamountsofdamage(USGS,2012).The

    numberofearthquakesthatisbeinglookedatwasnarroweddownbygettingamapofpopulated

  • 4

    areasandcreatingabufferzone.ThestudyusedahighresolutionSedacshapefileofpopulated

    areastofindonlyearthquakesthatoccurredwithin30milesofametropolitanarea.Someofthe

    earthquakesinthestudyweremissingdataontheMercalliindexsotheyweredeletedtoretain

    onlyinformationonearthquakesthatshowedbothmagnitudeandMercalliindexdata.Itwas

    decidedthattheanalysisshouldrepresentspatiallydiverseearthquakesacrossarangeof

    magnitudesinordertobetterunderstandearthquakeseffectsindifferentregions.Therefore,ten

    earthquakesofvaryingmagnitudes,indifferentregionswereselected.

    Thestudyalsolookedatotherfactorsthataffectthedamagedonebyearthquakes,such

    asdevelopmentandGDPinrelationtopopulation.OnArcmap,twochoroplethmapsweremade

    toshowcontrastbetweencountries'GDPandpopulation.Thiswasdonebysymbolizationof

    GDPandpopulationthroughgraduatedcolors.

  • 5

    Results

    Figure1

  • 6

    AnalysisofPopulationandGDPinRelationtoEarthquakeDamage

    Aglobaleconomicandpopulationassessmentwascompletedusinggraduatedcolorsina

    chloroplethmap.Thismapinformedthepotentialforearthquakedamageindifferentcountries.

    Activeearthquakeregionswithhighpopulationsareofinterestbecausetherewilllikelybea

    highnumberofpeopleaffectedthroughinjuryandevendeath.Placeswithnoteworthy

    populationsaretheUnitedStates,Brazil,Nigeria,China,Japan,andRussia.

    GDPisanotherpotentialindicatorofdamagedone.Althoughnationalincomeplayslittle

    roleinexplainingwhichnationsarelikelytoexperienceanaturaldisaster,poornationsare

    likelytohavepoorlyconstructedbuildingsandinfrastructurethatcouldcollapseduringan

    earthquake,whilerichnationsarelikelytohaveexpensiveinfrastructurethatwillbemore

    sturdyinanearthquake,buthaveahighreplacementcostifdamaged.(Kahn,2005).Placeswith

    thelowestGDPareMongolia,mostofAfrica,andWesternSouthAmerica.Placeswithhighest

    GDParetheUnitedStates,WesternEurope,India,China,Japan,andRussia.Thelocationsof

    interestforlargeearthquakesandtheirrelateddamagearehighlypopulatedareaswithextreme

    incomequalitiessuchasverywealthyorverypoor.

  • 7

  • 8

    Figure2

    AnalysisofRichterandMercalliScales

    ThepurposeofthisresearchistocomparetheRichterandMercalliscalesfortheir

    accuracyinrepresentingdamagedonebyearthquakes.Inordertopursuethisanalysis,itis

    importanttounderstandthedifferencebetweenthesescales.TheRichterscaleisusedtoratethe

    magnitudeofanearthquaketheamountofenergyitreleased.Thisiscalculatedusing

    informationgatheredbyaseismograph.TheRichterscaleislogarithmic,meaningthat

    wholenumberjumpsindicateatenfoldincreaseinenergyreleased.Theintensityscaleby

    Mercallimeasurestheeffectsoftheearthquakeonpeopleandbuildingsintheaffectedarea.Itis

    uniquefromtheRichterscalebecauseitincorporatesobservationsbypeopleandissubjective.

    Affectedpeopleareaskediftheywereawakenedbytheearthquake,iffurnituremoved,was

    theredamagetochimneysortowallsintheirhome.Engineersalsoexaminestructuraldamageto

    buildingsandothermanmadestructures.Thisinformationiscompiledtocreateanintensity

    map.ThemaphascirclesradiatingoutfromtheepicenteroftheearthquakewithRoman

    numeralsshowingtheintensityoftheearthquakeindifferentareas.Thesetwoscaleshave

    entirelydifferenttechniquesformeasurement,butthequestionstillremains,whichdoesabetter

    jobrepresentingtheactualeffectsofanearthquake?

  • 9

    TheearthquakesofinterestforthisstudyarethosewhichtheRichterandMercalliscale

    isindisagreementofeachotherandarelocatedwithinthepreviouslydescribedregionsof

    interest.ThismapisgivenagraduatedcolorscalefordevelopmentasasupplementfortheGDP

    datatohelpwithanalysis.Development,GDP,andearthquakedamagearecloselycorrelated,a

    10%increaseinpercapitaGDPdecreasesnationalearthquakedeathsby5.3%(Kahn,2005).

    ThemeasurementforeachearthquakescaleisrepresentedinFigure2bythecoloreddots.

    EarthquakesthatsatisfythecriteriaforstudyareintheUnitedStates,Chile,India,China,and

    Japan.Acloserlookateachoftheseearthquakeswillshedlightonwhyadiscrepancyexists

    betweenthescales.

  • 10

    Figure3AnalysisofChinaandJapan

    Figure3showsbotheconomydevelopmentcategorizationandaMercalliIndexratingofthree

    earthquakes.Higherresolutionpopulationdatahasbeenoverlayed,withdarkershadesrepresenting

    higherpopulationandlightershades,lowerpopulation.Chinaisconsideredalevel3worldemerging

    economyfromthepreviousmapondevelopment.Historically,Chinaisnotableforitsmembershipin

    thetopfiveglobalemergingeconomiesknownasBRICS(Mishra,2014).BRICScountriesinclude

    Brazil,Russia,India,China,andrecentlyaddedSouthAfrica.Theyaredistinguishedbytheirlarge,

    fastgrowingeconomiesandsignificantinfluenceonregionalandglobalaffairs.Withinthiscontext,

    manyoncesmallvillageshavetransformedintolargetownsandevenmegacitiesincorrelationwiththe

    growthoftheeconomy.However,thisrapidgrowthisoftenattheexpenseofproperconstructionand

    buildingcoderegulationforhazardssuchasearthquakes,especiallyinChina(Gurria,2013).In

    earthquakeproneregionsontheeastcoastofChina,withconcentratedpopulationandpoorbuilding

    coderegulation,disasterisinevitable.

    Figure3showsthelocationandMMIofthreeseparateearthquakes,locatedinChinaand

    Japan.TheearthquakeinChinashowninFigure3isrepresentedbyareddotwithanMMIof11.This

    isthesecondhighestpossibleleveloftheMercalliscale.Itwasgivenamagnitudeof7.5ontheRichter

    scale,whichisstrong,butbarelywithintheclassificationabovewhicharelikelytocausestructural

    damage(magnitude7andabove).LocatednearBeijingtheworlds12thlargestmegacitywithover17

  • 11

    millionpeople,anearthquakeofreasonablesizeinthisregionislikelytocausenumerousinjuries,

    deaths,andmillionsofdollarsindamagetoinfrastructurenottomentionlastingissueslikewaterline

    disruption,highwaydestruction,powerplantmalfunctions,communicationoutages,andfoodtransport

    interruptions.Thisearthquake,barelyofreasonablesizeaccordingtotheRichterscale,caused

    250,000deaths,800,000injuries,and5,600millionUSDindamage.Thisiswellrepresentedbythe

    extremelyhighMMIclassification,butunderrepresentedbytheRichterscalemagnitude7.5.

    TheearthquakeonFigure3locatedinJapanandisalsoindicatedbyareddotand11MMI.It

    wasmeasuredat6.9ontheRichterscale,justshytherangefordamagetobeexpected.This

    discrepancyinthemeasurementsisduetotheoccurrenceofanassociatedtsunami,populationdensity,

    veryhighdevelopment,andhighGDPofJapan.TheearthquakeoccurredinJanuaryof1995,andit

    costJapan100,000millionUSDindamagethemostexpensiveearthquakeofthetenexaminedinthis

    report(Malone,2002).Over5,000peoplediedinthisearthquakeeventandintheaftermath,whichis

    unusualforitsrelativelylowmagnitude(Malone,2012).Generally,thedatasuggeststhatwealthier

    nationsexperiencehigherdamagecosts,butfewerdeaths.DuetoJapansuniquevulnerability,ithad

  • 12

    extremelyhighdeathsandcosts.Theimagebelowshowssomedamagefromthisearthquake.

    Figure4

    AnalysisofSouthAmerica

  • 13

    TheearthquakeinAntofagasta,Chileshowninfigure4,occurredintheSummerof1995,

    measuringan8ontheRichteranda7ontheMercalliIndex.Thisdiscrepancyofscalesis

    notablehere.Thisisaveryhighmagnitudewithalowermercallirating.Thecityishighly

    populatedwithoneofthehighestGDPsofthecountry(Llera,1995).Theanswerliesinthe

    historyandgeologyoftheregion.UnusuallyheavyrainsoccurredinAntofagastainJune1991,

    whichduetoitsextremelyaridconditions,devastatedmuchofthecitywithlandslidesand

    flooding.Dozensofdeathsandthousandsofhomesandbuildingsweredestroyed,thedamage

    costapproximately70millionUSD(Llera,1995).Justafewyearslater,whenthecitywasstill

    inrecoveryfromtherainsof1991,thisearthquakehitacitywithlessbuildingstodestroy.The

    geologyofAntofagastaconverselyhelpedreducethedamageofthisnaturaldisaster.Insome

    areasoftheworld,severeearthquakedamageistheresultofliquefactionofsoil.Intheright

    conditions,theviolentshakingfromanearthquakewillmakelooselypackedsedimentsandsoil

    behavelikealiquid.Whenabuildingorhouseisbuiltonthistypeofsediment,liquefactionwill

    causethestructuretocollapsemoreeasily.Highlydevelopedareasbuiltonlooseground

    materialcansufferseveredamagefromevenarelativelymildearthquake.Fortunately,

    Antofagastaisinoneofthemostaridplacesintheworld,andthehard,drysoilmadeitdifficult

    fortheearthquakewavestotravel.Thisdataandhistoryshowthatthemagnitudeofenergy

  • 14

    released,asmeasuredbytheRichterscale,doesnotgiveacompleterepresentationoftheactual

    shakinganddamagedonebyanearthquake.

    Figure5

    AnalysisofCalifornia

    The1994Northridge,CaliforniaearthquakeshowninFigure6wasmeasuredata6.7(notinthe

    usualdamagecausingrange)ontheRichterscaleanda9ontheMercalliIndex.These

    measurementsareinpartialagreement,howevertheMercalliappearedtounderrepresentthe

    damageandintensitywhichoccurred.Thenumberofdeathswasrelativelylowat60,butthere

  • 15

    was40,000millionUSDinstructuraldamagesecondonlytoJapanscostsinthisstudy

    (Malone,2002).Incontextoftheregionsdemographics,theUnitedStatesisinthehighestGDP

    level,highestdevelopmentlevel,andsecondhighestpopulationlevel.Thissetofeconomic

    circumstancesissimilartothe1995Japanearthquake,themaindifferenceswereaslightlylower

    magnitudeandthatthecityaffectedinCaliforniawasnotasdenselypopulatedasthecityin

    Japan,whichislikelythereasonforthequitelowdeathtollintheNorthridgeearthquake.The

    MercalliIndexwouldbetterrepresentthedamageata10,primarilybecauseofthehighdamage

    costs.Inthecaseofthe1994Northridgeearthquake,neitherscalegaveanaccuratedescription

    ofthedamageandintensitythatoccurred.

    Figure6

    ScatterPlotofMagnitudeandMMI

  • 16

    Asafinalconfirmationoftheanalysisinthisreport,ascatterplotofthetenearthquakeswas

    generated.Scatterplotsshowthestrengthofrelationshipindatasetsvisuallyandareoftenseen

    asthefinalwordonwhetherarelationshipexistsbetweendata.Asshowninfigure6,a

    correlationdoesappeartoexistbetweenthetwoscales,buttherearetwonotableoutliers.The

    upperleftdotat8and7isanoutlier.Thisdotrepresentsthe1995Chileearthquake,onewith

    unusuallylowdamageforsuchahighmagnitudeevent.Reasonsforthisinconsistencywere

    discussedatlengthintheanalysis,withtheprimaryreasonbeingthefortunategeologyofthe

    region.Thedotat7and11istheothernotableoutlier,whichisthe1995Japanearthquake.The

    mainreasonsforthisdisconnectisthedangerousmixofrisksinJapanwhichmakeitvulnerable

    tonaturaldisastersingeneral.Ultimately,thetwoscalesareinagreementmostofthetime,with

    afewoutliersfavoringMercalliasthebestindicatorforactualdamageandlossoflifecausedby

    anearthquake.Evenwiththeissueofsubjectivityfromthepublicsinputforitsdata,itisstilla

    betterindicatorofdamagethantheRichterScale..

    Conclusion

    ThestudysanalysisshowsthattheMercalliIndexisabetterrepresentationofdamage

    donetonearbycitiesovertheRichterscale,despiteitssubjectivity.Wealsofoundthat

    earthquakesinnationswithmoredisasterpreparednessdidnotharmonizetherelationship

    betweenthescales,aswehadhypothesized.

  • 17

    Theearthquakesmagnitudesconveyedtheamountofenergyreleasedbytheindividual

    disastersbutdoesnotgiveinsightintotheexpecteddamage.Thestudynotedthatwhilemost

    highlydevelopedareasincurredhugeamountsofdamagefromearthquakes,therewasa

    significantlysmallerdeathtoll.Amongthetenearthquakesexamined,Japanistheexception

    withahighnumberofdeathsanddamagecost.Theanalysisshowedthatthisisduetothehigh

    populationdensityanddevelopmentfoundinJapan.Asidefromoutliersliketheearthquakein

    JapanthereseemstobeapositivecorrelationbetweentheMercalliindexandearthquake

    magnitude.Highermagnitudeearthquakeswillleadtomoredamagebuttheamountofdamage

    willalsodependonhowwelldevelopedaregionis.Countriesinwhichthereisahigherstandard

    oflifecanexpectahighercostindamagesbutamuchlowerdeathcount.Toconclude,an

    earthquakesmagnitudecangiveusanideaofhowmuchdamagecanbeexpected,but

    consideringtheMercalliIndexisvaluablebecauseittakesotherfactorssuchaslocationand

    levelofdevelopmentintoaccount.

  • 18

    References

    Bellis,M.(2015).CharlesRichterTheRichterMagnitudeScale.NEISInterview.

    http://inventors.about.com/od/qrstartinventors/a/Charles_Richter.htm

    CenterforInternationalEarthScienceInformationNetworkCIESINColumbiaUniversity,

    UnitedNationsFoodandAgricultureProgrammeFAO,andCentroInternacionalde

    AgriculturaTropicalCIAT.2005.GriddedPopulationoftheWorld,Version3(GPWv3):

    PopulationCountGrid.Palisades,NY:NASASocioeconomicDataandApplicationsCenter

    (SEDAC).Web.03162015.http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4639MPP.

    GuhaSapirD,Vos,F.,Below,R.,andPonserre,S.(2010)AnnualDisasterStatisticalReview

    2010:TheNumbersandTrends.Brussels:CRED.

    http://crmiundp.org/documents/documentos/98.pdf

    Gurria,A.(2013).ThePeoplesRepublicofChinaAvoidingtheMiddleIncomeTrap:Policies

    ForSustainedandInclusiveGrowth.OECD.(1),6.Web.03162015.

    http://www.oecd.org/china/ChinaBrochureengSeptember2013.pdf

    Kahn,M.(2005).TheDeathTollfromNaturalDisasters:TheRoleofIncome,Geography,and

    Institutions.ReviewofEconomicsandStatistics2005.87(2),271284.Web.03162015.

    http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/0034653053970339

    Llera,Juan.etal.(1995).TheJuly30,1995,AntofagastaEarthquake.NationalScience

    Foundation.EERISpecialEarthquakeReport.Web.03162015.

    https://www.eeri.org/lfe/pdf/Chile_Antofagasta_Insert_Sep95.pdf

    Malone,L.,Palmer,A.,andVoigt,C.(2002).MappingOurWorld:GISLessonsforEducators.

    ExploringEarthquakesinSpaceandTimeThroughtheInternetandaGeographicInformation

  • 19

    System.ESRIPress:107111Web.03162015.

    http://www.colorado.edu/geography/foote/maps/assign/hotspots/hotspots.html

    Mishra,P.(2014).ChinaisDrivingtheBRICSTrain.BloombergLP.Web.03162015.

    http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/20140720/chinaisdrivingthebricstrain

    NationalGeophysicalDataCenter/WorldDataService(NGDC/WDS):SignificantEarthquake

    Database.NationalGeophysicalDataCenter,NOAA.Web.03162015.

    doi:10.7289/V5TD9V7K

    USGS(2005).CitizensContributetoEarthquakeScience.U.S.GeologicalSurvey.Web.

    03162015.http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2005/3016/

    USGS(2012).EarthquakesFactsandStatistics.EarthquakesHazardsProgram.Web.

    03162015.http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/year/eqstats.php