_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
ANTIMATTER PROPULSION
Humankind has been exploring space for four decades, and in that time our
reach
has
extended throughout the solar system with the use of unmanned
probes. Finally, what about the exploration of other solar
systems?
INTRODUCTION
Humankind has been exploring space for four decades, and in time our
reach has extended throughout the solar system with the use of unmanned
probes. Finally, what abut the exploration of our solar systems?
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.1
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
These issues are being addressed by the NASA Advanced Space
Transportation Program (ASTP), which is currently investigating new ways to
propel a unmanned spacecraft to Alpha Centauri in the span of a human
lifetime of 50 years Both tasks suffer the same dilemma: chemical propellants
simply will not work. For the first case, chemical propellants lack the energy
needed to boost a space probe up to 10% the speed of light. The overall
mass of such a booster would be unthinkable. For the latter case, the
spacecraft only needs to obtain the velocity necessary to get to Mars within 3-
6 months; however, the mass of a manned payload once again places a
burden on the size of the booster engine.
Many concepts have been devised. For years, scientists have
suggested nuclear fission as an alternative approach for sending a manned
spacecraft to Mars. Although the specific impulse (Isp) is still too low for
interstellar missions, it does open new avenues near the vicinity of Earth.
Unfortunately, environmental issues have all but "grounded" the use of
nuclear fission as a propulsion source. Nuclear fusion is cleaner, and it is a
more exciting prospect with its higher energy density and specific impulse.
However, scientists are still developing such a device that offers beyond
break-even energy (more energy output than input), let alone making the
same device small enough to be sent into deep space. Last, electric
propulsion, as used for Deep Space I, cannot accelerate a spacecraft fast
enough for the tasks mentioned above due to its low thrust-to-weight ratio.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.2
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
It is here that antimatter addresses attention. Upon
annihilation with matter, antimatter offers the highest energy
density of any material currently found on Earth. As shown in the
table below, this indicates that antimatter offers the greatest
specific impulse of any propellant currently available or in
development, and its thrust-to-weight ratio is still comparable with
that of chemical propulsion. Simply put, it would take only 100
milligrams of antimatter to equal the propulsive energy of the
Space Shuttle.
Propulsion
Type
Specific
Impulse [sec]
Thrust-to-
Weight Ratio
Chemical
Bipropellant200 - 410 .1 - 10
Electromagnetic 1200 - 5000 10-4 - 10-3
Nuclear Fission 500 - 3000 .01 - 10
Nuclear Fusion 10+4 - 10+5 10-5 - 10-2
Antimatter
Annihilation10+3 - 10+6 10-3 - 1
Antimatter is one of the most recognized and attractive words in
science fiction. It's the stuff that drives fictional starships from one side of the
universe to the other. Now NASA is giving it serious consideration as a rocket
propellant to get around the solar system. A gram of antimatter would carry as
much potential energy as 1,000 Space Shuttle external tanks carry.
The rockets will employ the ages old action-reaction principle in an
interesting meeting of Albert Einstein (E=mc2) and Isaac Newton (F=ma).
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.3
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
What is Antimatter?
Antimatter is exactly what you might think it is -- the opposite of normal
matter, of which the majority of our universe is made. Until just recently, the
presence of antimatter in our universe was considered to be only theoretical. In
1928, British physicist Paul A.M. Dirac revised Einstein's famous equation
E=mc2. Dirac said that Einstein didn't consider that the "m" in the equation --
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.4
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
mass -- could have negative properties as well as positive. Dirac's equation (E =
+ or - mc2) allowed for the existence of anti-particles in our universe. Scientists
have since proven that several anti-particles exist.
These anti-particles are, literally, mirror images of normal matter. Each
anti-particle has the same mass as its corresponding particle, but the electrical
charges are reversed.
Positrons –
Electrons with a positive instead of negative charge. Discovered by
Carl Anderson in 1932, positrons were the first evidence that antimatter
existed.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.5
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
Anti-protons –
Protons that have a negative instead of the usual positive charge.
Anti-atoms –
Pairing together positrons and antiprotons, scientists at CERN, the
European Organization for Nuclear Research, created the first anti-atom.
Nine anti-hydrogen atoms were created, each lasting only 40 nanoseconds.
Annihilation –
The complete conversion of matter into energy-releases the most
energy per unit mass of any known reaction in physics.
When antimatter comes into contact with normal matter, these equal but
particles collide to produce an explosion emitting pure radiation, which travels
out opposite the point of the explosion at the speed of light. Both particles that
created the explosion are completely annihilated, leaving behind other
subatomic particles. The explosion that occurs when antimatter and matter
interact transfers the entire mass of both objects into energy. Scientists
believe that this energy is more powerful than any that can be generated by
other propulsion methods.
So, why haven't we built a matter-antimatter reaction engine? The problem
with developing antimatter propulsion is that there is a lack of antimatter
existing in the universe. If there were equal amounts of matter and antimatter,
we would likely see these reactions around us. Since antimatter doesn't exist
around us, we don't see the light that would result from it colliding with matter.
.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.6
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
Matter-Antimatter Engine
Scientists announced early designs for an antimatter engine that could
generate enormous thrust with only small amounts of antimatter fueling it. The
amount of antimatter needed to supply the engine for a one-year trip to Mars
could be as little as a millionth of a gram. Matter-antimatter propulsion will be
the most efficient propulsion ever developed, because 100 percent of the
mass of the matter and antimatter is converted into energy. When matter and
antimatter collide, the energy released by their annihilation releases about 10
billion times the energy that chemical energy such as hydrogen and oxygen
combustion, the kind used by the space shuttle, releases. Matter-antimatter
reactions are 1,000 times more powerful than the nuclear fission produced in
nuclear power plants and 300 times more powerful than nuclear fusion
energy. So, matter-antimatter engines have the potential to take us farther
with less fuel.
There are three main components to a matter-antimatter engine:
Magnetic storage rings –
Antimatter must be separated from normal matter so storage rings
with magnetic fields can move the antimatter around the ring until it is needed
to create energy.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.7
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
Feed system –
When the spacecraft needs more power, the antimatter will be
released to collide with a target of matter, which releases energy.
Magnetic rocket nozzle thruster –
Like a particle collided on Earth, a long magnetic nozzle will move the
energy created by the matter-antimatter through a thruster. The storage rings
on the spacecraft will hold the antimatter.
The popular belief is that an antimatter particle coming in contact with
its matter counterpart yields energy. That's true for electrons and positrons
(anti-electrons). They'll produce gamma rays at 511,000 electron volts.
But heavier particles like protons and anti-protons are somewhat
messier, making gamma rays and leaving a spray of secondary particles that
eventually decay into neutrinos and low-energy gamma rays.
And that is partly what Schmidt and others want in an antimatter
engine. The gamma rays from a perfect reaction would escape immediately,
unless the ship had thick shielding, and serve no purpose. But the charged
debris from a proton/anti-proton annihilation can push a ship.
Production of Antimatter
Antimatter does not exist in nature or at least certainly nowhere near
us, which is just as well. If it did it would immediately annihilate with matter
and explode with more force than we have ever experienced.
This means we have to manufacture it and then very carefully store it;
it is only produced at certain high-energy laboratories around the world
(probably most famously at CERN in Geneva).
The actual manufacturing is achieved in a particle accelerator creating
extremely high-energy collisions. Over the past 20 years scientists at CERN
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.8
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
have been using antiparticles in many different ways for their daily work.
Electrons and positrons (anti electrons) do a neat job of it, but protons
and antiprotons are messy. They yield three types of pions that 1) decay to
produce gamma radiation 2) decay to produce muons and neutrinos plus
electrons and positrons that make more gamma rays. Electrons are
lightweight and tough to store in a magnetic model, so scientists have been
working on antiprotons whose greater mass makes them easier to handle.
(Even anti-atoms that might be stored at near absolute zero are a possibility.)
Billionths of a gram of antiprotons are created each year in high-energy
particle accelerators high in the Alps. A billion antiprotons are produced every
10 minutes, but only 1,000 of those are captured and stored.
Antiparticles can be generated by colliding subatomic particles. Before
being delivered to the various physics experiments, they must be isolated,
collected and stored in order to tune their energy to the appropriate level.
Until now, each of these steps has been carried out by a dedicated
machine with the main purpose of providing high-energy antiparticles.
But now the first "self-contained antiproton factory", the Antiproton
Decelerator (or AD), is operational at CERN . It will produce the low energy
antiprotons needed for a range of studies, including the synthesis of
antihydrogen atoms - the creation of antimatter.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.9
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
Making Antiprotons
Antimatter in the form of antiprotons is being made today, albeit in
small quantities. The antiprotons are generated by sending a high-energy
beam of protons into a metal target. When the relativistic protons strike the
dense metal nuclei, their kinetic energy, which is many times their rest-mass
energy, is converted into a spray of particles, some of which are antiprotons.
A magnetic field focuser and selector separates the antiprotons from the
resulting debris and directs the antiprotons into a storage ring. These
collecting rings have stored as many as 1012 antiprotons for day sat a time. To
give some scale as to what has already been accomplished at these research
facilities, 1012 antiprotons have a mass of 1.7 pg. When this amount of
antimatter is annihilated with an equivalent amount of normal matter, it will
release300 J, an engineering significant amount of energy.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.10
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
STORING ANTIMATTER
In a recent experiment, a team of scientists took the low energy
antiprotons in one of these rings, slowed them down to almost zero velocity,
and captured a few hundred antiprotons in a small electromagnetic ion trap.
Other experiments planned for late 1987 will attempt to capture many millions
of antiprotons in a trap no bigger than a thermos bottle. The electromagnetic
trap will be made portable so the antiprotons can be transported to other
laboratories for experiments.
In order to use antiprotons as a propulsion fuel, it will be necessary to
find a more compact method of storage than an ion trap, which is limited to
relatively low ion densities. Another Air Force sponsored research program is
looking into adding positrons to the antiprotons in the ion traps and slowly
building up "cluster ions" of antihydrogen. These cluster ions are large
agglomerations of neutral antihydrogen atoms clustered around a single
antiproton ion. The net negative electric charge of the cluster ion allows it to
be kept in the ion trap, yet the mass of each ion can be increased until we
have an ice crystal with enough charge that it can be electrostatically levitated
without touching the walls of the cryogenically cooled trap
Antimatter does not exist in nature - or at least certainly nowhere near
us, which is just as well. If it did it would immediately annihilate with matter
and explode with more force than we have ever experienced.
This means we have to manufacture it and then very carefully store it;
it is only produced at certain high-energy laboratories around the world
(probably most famously at CERN in Geneva).The actual manufacturing is
achieved in a particle accelerator creating extremely high-energy collisions,
which results in the kinetic energy being converted to matter (subatomic
particles), some of which is antimatter.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.11
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
Storage is possible because it may be controlled in magnetic fields,
thereby avoiding the obvious problem of trying to store it in structural
containers.
The Penning trap has been developed; it is a portable antiproton trap,
which is capable of storing 1010 (10^10) antiprotons for one week using the
superposition of electric and magnetic fields. The next stage is an
improvement to 1012 (10^12) antiproton storage.
For complete antimatter propulsion it is thought that 1020 (10^20) anti-protons
will need to be stored.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.12
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
Storage is possible because it may be controlled in magnetic fields,
thereby avoiding the obvious problem of trying to store it in structural
containers.
APPLICATION TO PROPULSION
Because of the long lifetime and interaction length of the charged pions
that result from the annihilation of antiprotons with protons, it is relatively easy
to collect the charged pions in a thrust chamber constructed of magnetic
fields and to obtain propulsion from them.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.13
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
As is shown in Figure the energy in the pions can then either be used
to heat a working fluid, such as hydrogen, to produce thrust, or the high-
speed pions themselves can be directed by a magnetic nozzle to produce
thrust. Even after the charged pions decay, they decay into energetic charged
muons, which have even longer lifetimes and interaction lengths for further
conversion into thrust. Thus, if sufficient quantities of antiprotons could be
made, captured, and stored, then presently known physical principles show
that they can be used as a highly efficient propulsion fuel.
Since antimatter does not exist naturally, it must be made, one particle
at a time. It is a synthetic fuel. It will always require much (~l04 times) more
energy to produce antimatter than can be extracted from the annihilation
process. Its major advantage is that it is a highly concentrated form of energy
storage. A tenth of a milligram, about the size of a single grain of salt,
contains the energy of 2 tonnes of the best rocket fuel known, liquid
oxygen/liquid hydrogen.
A study that compared antihydrogen propulsion systems with chemical
propulsion systems found that antiproton propulsion could possibly be cost
effective for space propulsion. More importantly, it was mission enabling, in
that it would allow missions to be performed that are essentially impossible to
perform with chemical fuels.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.14
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
There are four main designs for an antimatter rocket; they are listed here
in increasing specific impulse:
Solid Core - Annihilation occurs inside a solid-core heat exchanger, the
reaction superheats hydrogen propellant that is expelled through a nozzle.
High efficiency and high thrust, but due to the materials the specific
impulse is only 1000secs at best.
Gas Core - Annihilation occurs in the hydrogen propellant. The charged
pions are controlled in magnetic fields and superheat the hydrogen; there
is some loss in the form of gamma rays that cannot be controlled. Specific
impulse of 2500secs.
Plasma Core - Annihilation of larger amounts of antimatter in hydrogen to
produce hot plasma. Plasma contained in magnetic fields, again some
loss in form of gamma radiation, and the plasma is expelled to produce
thrust. There are no material constraints here so higher specific impulse is
possible (anywhere from 5,000 to 100,000secs).
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.15
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
Beam Core - Direct one to one annihilation, magnetic fields focus the
energetic charged pions that are used directly as the exhausted propellant
mass. These pions travel close to speed of light.
ADVANTAGES:
1. Antimatter is hundred percent efficient. When Antimtter comes in contact
with Matter it annihilates and the whole is converted into Energy.
2. For propulsion of spacecraft the amount of Antimatter required will be very
less. A ten-gram of Antimatter would be enough to send manned
spacecraft to Mars.
3. Specific impulse of Antimatter is very high. The specific impulse could be
greater than 10,000,000secs.
4. Speed of Antimatter particles is about 94% that of speed of light. The
spacecrafts with fuel as Antimatter will almost travel at the speed of light.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.16
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
DISADVANTAGES:
1. Problem with developing Antimatter is that it does not exists naturally.
2. Production of Antimatter is a problem .A few gram of Antimatter will take
many years. Large-scale production techniques are not yet developed.
3. Storing Antimatter is very difficult. It requires special vessels to store.
4. Time of existence of Antimatter is very less. When scientist made Anti-
atoms, each of which lasted for about 40 billionths of second.
5. Energy from matter-antimatter reaction is released in the form of particles
moving about one third speed of light. Speed is very high.
6. Antimatter is the most expensive substance on Earth about $62.5 trillion a
gram.
OTHER APPLICATIONS:
1. Antimatter can be used in medicine for scanning.
2. It can be used for medical diagnosis where positrons are used to identify
diseases with positron emission Tomography or PET-scan.
3. Antimatter can be used to propel the future cars.
4. It is possible to built Antimatter weapon.
5. By beaming Anti-protons through large metal structure to detect flaws and
even to cure flaws internally.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.17
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
PLANS FOR ANTI-MATTER PROPULSION:
Because antiproton propulsion promises a major advance in Space
propulsion capability, the recently completed Air Force Systems Command
Project Forecast II study recommended that their Force start a new program
in antimatter propulsion. As a direct result of the Project Forecast II
recommendations, the Air Force Astronautics Laboratory at Edwards AFB in
California has reorganized its advanced propulsion activities and formed a
new project called ARIES (Applied Research In Energy Storage). The project
has two major thrusts - chemically bound excited states and antimatter.
The Air Force Office of Scientific Research has initiated a new
program on antimatter research in the Physical and Geophysical Sciences
Branch under Col. Hugo Weichel. The Program Manager for Antimatter is
Maj. John Prince, who evaluates unsolicited proposals for research on
antimatter sciences. In Europe, an Antimatter Research Team (ART) has
been formed atTelespazio, SpA per I.e. Communication Spaziali in Italy. Their
research work will cover antiproton and positron production and storage, and
engine simulations, leading ultimately to technology demonstrations.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.18
_____________________________________________________________Antimatter propulsion
CONCLUSION:
After analyzing the whole topic, it can be concluded that the Antimatter
propulsion even though it is under development ,but it will certainly bring
revolutionary change in conventional propulsion systems. Now mankind can
think about the journey beyond the Galaxy.
Scientist believe that the speed of an Matter-Antimatter powered
spacecrafts would allow man to go where no man has gone before in space.
______________________________________________________________A.I.S.S.M.S.’s C.O.E.19