Transcript
Page 1: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra-

and a sub-urban area

Ian YesilonisRichard Pouyat

Page 2: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Citywide results

• P, K, and bulk density differentiated forest from residential soils possibly due to management.

• Ca and pH differentiated residential grass from other turf grass cover types.

• Cu, Pb, and Zn were related to automobile sources and not related to TRI sites.

• Heavy metals were not explained by land use/cover at citywide scale.

Page 3: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Neighborhood scale• Ultra urban inner city neighborhood (WS263)• Suburban neighborhood (Cub Hill)

Page 4: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Methods

• The 0-5 cm soil samples were taken randomly stratified by an Ecotope land use/cover classification system.

• The soils were digested with a strong acid.

Page 5: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

High residential density watershed

Low residential density watershed

1 km radius

Sampling design

Page 6: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area
Page 7: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area
Page 8: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

• Mostly constructed

Watershed 263 Ecotope map

Page 9: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

ResultsC: ConstructedD: DisturbedOM: Ornamental

Mixed vegetationOP: Ornamental Perennial

Page 10: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

WS 263 is higher in most soil metal and nutrient concentrations for each Ecotope class.

Page 11: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Automobile by-products

Pb: 22, 120, 1700, 11, 56State average, Eco-SSL:plants, soil invertebrates, avian, and mammalian wildlife Cu: 20, 70, 80, 28, 51

Zn: 39

Page 12: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Coal by-products

V: 63, (m) 280 Cr: 47.9, (m) Cr III 34, Cr IV 81

Page 13: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Urban deposition of Calcium?

Lawn nutrients

Is the potassium from the surface geology, ie. Plagioclase feldspars?

Page 14: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

pH series

Increased management of young lawns?

Page 15: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Opposite of what we expected!

Page 16: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Conclusions• WS 263 had greater concentrations of Ca,

Zn, Pb, S, Cu, As, and Mn than Cub Hill.– The only metal of concern in WS 263 Pb.

• Cub Hill had greater concentrations of K.

• For the residential soils of Cub Hill Ca and pH were weakly correlated to age of residential development.

Page 17: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Future Research

• Identify hot spots for accumulation of metals– Community awareness (intervention) – Directing mitigation efforts

• Understand relationship of metals to human exposure– Transport and movement– Source sink relationships

Page 18: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Acknowledgements

• Thanks to the Cub Hill and WS263 residents who allowed us to take soil samples

• Ben Smith, Abe Kloze, Kate Donovan, and Laura Norris.

• Dave Nowak and Jeff Walton.

• Funding and in-kind support– USFS, BES, CUERE

Page 19: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area
Page 20: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

Cub Hill land use conversion from 1938 to 1996

Page 21: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

1938

Page 22: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

1943

Page 23: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

1953

Page 24: A comparison of soil characteristics of an ultra- and a sub-urban area

1996


Recommended