87th Air Base Wing
Mr. Curtis Frye, P.E.Chief, Environmental Restoration Program
AFCEC/CZOE
Review of Action Items
3“WIN AS ONE”
Action ItemsNo action Items from last RAB meeting
Final Community Involvement Plan Update (CIP) issued
Reminder on RAB website:www.envirorestorejbmdl.com
4“WIN AS ONE”
Action ItemsUpdate on Site Inspection (SI) for
perfluorinated compounds (PFCs): Associated with use/release of aqueous film
forming foam (AFFF) for firefighting/training Investigating 21 “PFC Areas” across JB MDL McGuire (11), Dix (4), Lakehurst (6) Draft SI Work plan reviewed by EPA and NJDEP Final Work Plan in preparation Contractor’s sampling crew mobilized on 02
August, sampling fieldwork approximately 30% complete
87th Air Base Wing
Mr. Michael Figura, P.E.Program Manager, Environmental Restoration Program
AFCEC/CZOE
Dix Former Small Arms Range, Site ZZ002Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) and Removal Action
Work Plan
12“WIN AS ONE”
Path ForwardGroundwater Remedial Investigation -
August 2016 through February 2017Removal Action beginning November 2016Removal Action Report September 2017Remedial Investigation Report November
2017 Feasibility Study Report January 2018
87th Air Base Wing
Mr. Michael Figura, P.E.Program Manager, Environmental Restoration Program
AFCEC/CZOE
Lakehurst Proving Grounds Parachute Jump Circle Bombing Targets Destruction of Recovered Chemical Munitions
21“WIN AS ONE”
Path Forward
Remedial Investigation report early 2017
Fund request submitted for: Surface Clearance/Advanced Classification
of jump circle area Would be awarded in FY17, conducted in FY 18 Removal Action of jump circle area Would be awarded in FY18, conducted in FY19-
20
87th Air Base Wing
Mr. Michael Figura, P.E.Program Manager, Environmental Restoration Program
AFCEC/CZOE
Lakehurst Basewide Five Year Review
24
Lakehurst Five Year Review
Five Year Reviews are required by CERCLA for sites where remedial actions do not allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure
Lakehurst Five Year Review is complete
Included the following Sites: TT013 AT014 LF029 LF042 (Area A/B) AT016 TT017 (Area C) LF031 (Area D) DP032 (Area H) OW006 (Area I/J) SA004 (Area K)
25
Report concluded that the remedies in place at all Sites continue to be protective of Human Health and the Environment
EPA and NJDEP have concurred with the protectiveness determination Report being routed for signature by AFCEC Director of Environmental
Management Public notice will be issued when final report is signed and released
EPA Video of Five Year Review Process:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VguoeVT4FjI
Lakehurst Five Year Review
87th Air Base Wing
Mr. Tim Llewellyn, Project ManagerARCADIS
Land Use Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP) Overview
28“WIN AS ONE”
Land Use Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP)
DoD Definitions:
Land Use Control: Any physical, legal, or administrative mechanism that places restrictions on the use of, or limits access to, real property to prevent exposure to contaminants above permissible levels
• Institutional Controls (IC’s): Administrative and/or legal controls
• Engineering Controls (EC’s): Physical controls put in place to prevent exposure such as fencing/signage etc.
29“WIN AS ONE”
Land Use Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP)
LUCIP: Identifies the environmental LUCs that
are required at JB MDL to protect human health
Documents the responsibilities and procedures for establishing, maintaining, tracking, and enforcing LUCs
“Living” document updated annually
Meets both DoD and EPA requirements for implementing LUCs under CERCLA(but covers all Environmental Restoration Sites at JB MDL)
30“WIN AS ONE”
Land Use Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP)
LUCIP divides all JB MDL environmental sites into three categories
Sites without a selected remedy: Pre-Decision Document Sites
Sites with a selected remedy: Post-Decision Documents Sites
Sites with No Further Action Required: Post-Decision Document/Post Remedy
31“WIN AS ONE”
Land Use Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP)
1. Pre-Decision Document Sites Includes sites which are under investigation or remedy evaluation No formal Decision Document and LUCs at these sites are not legally required and considered
elective; but, the AF has established a LUC Awareness Program for these sites LUC Awareness Program
Purpose: Limit exposure to both known and potentially contaminated media Includes: Installation Development Plan (a.k.a Master Planning); GIS and AF Database Tracking Systems; LUC
Training and Awareness; Waivers to Construct and Dig Permits; MEC Sweep Requirement Policy; and Annual Inspections
2. Post-Decision Document Includes sites for which a Decision Document is in place Design document requires LUCs to protect human health and LUCs are mandatory Sites are subject to the LUC Awareness Program and all site-specific LUCs identified in the
Decision Document
3. No Further Action Includes sites that qualified for Unlimited Use and Unrestricted Exposure Sites require no LUCs or any other management by the AF
33“WIN AS ONE”
LUCIP SitesSite-Specific Inspection Form
(LF010)
Regulatory Program Size Location Land Use Use Restrictions Stakeholders Contaminants of Concern Annual Inspections Findings
35“WIN AS ONE”
Land Use Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP)
The Process:
August 2016: EPA is reviewing the 2015/2016 LUCIP Update October 2016: Conduct Annual Inspections January 2017: Submit the 2016 LUC Compliance Summary
Report (includes the findings of the inspections and any noted deficiencies) for EPA and DEP review and approval
March 2017: Begin 2017 LUCIP Updates Every 5 years: Findings of the Annual Inspections and LUC
Compliance Summary Report used in the CERCLA Five Year Review to evaluate the effectiveness of the remedy
37“WIN AS ONE”
McGuire Summary
NPL Site Status Revised Draft Final OU3 FS (subject of the dispute)
will be submitted to EPA/NJDEP this month
Major field event being completed this week (5 week event for 3 crews) The new data will supplement existing data and
be used for remedy evaluation in the FS documents in 2016/2017 Approximately 300 wells sampled Second confirmation round of data will be
collected in October/November
38“WIN AS ONE”
McGuire Summary NPL Sites (Continued)
Pilot scale tests of potential remedies are in progress at several sites (to support remedy evaluation in the FS documents) Multiphase extraction at OU2 (solvents) Natural Source Zone Depletion at OU4
(jet fuel) In-Situ Microcosms/enhanced
bioremediation at OU7 and OU8 (dissolved phase solvents)
39
McGuire State Led Petroleum Storage Sites
Implemented Remedies Monitored Natural Attenuation
Four sites (coming up on 1st year) (CF011; SS015; TU020; TU025)
AS/SVE One site (TU013)--startup/shakedown
phase ISCO
One site (TU018)—One of three injections complete
Remedies under Design Biosparging
One site (TU023) --Pilot test complete Excavation/MNA
One site (TU003)--Pilot test complete and revised remedy (excavation) under design
Site Closeout One site closed (DP501) Close out memo under development for
additional site (TU022)
40“WIN AS ONE”
BOMARC Update Feasibility Study moving forward for OT016, WP005,
and ST015
BOMARC SITE
41“WIN AS ONE”
BOMARC REMEDY STATUS
Meeting held with NJDEP 13 July 2016 FS will include evaluations of remedies for both TCE (OT016 and
WP005) plumes ST015 will be recommended for no further action
Technologies carried through for remedy evaluation include: Air Sparge/Soil Vapor Extraction Permeable Reactive Barriers Monitored Natural Attenuation Numerous technologies evaluated but not advanced for peat/lignite area
A remedy is under consideration that would Restore most of the aquifer to Class I PL standards in approximately 10
years Contain a 2 acre area where lignite/peat/clay is acting as a continuing
source until it is depleted (~100 yrs)
43“WIN AS ONE”
POTENTIAL REMEDY FOR OT016 and WP005
Proposed Air SpargeLines—Conceptual Design
Containment Area
44“WIN AS ONE”
BOMARC OT-16/WP005 SCHEDULE
Feasibility Study Draft FS to NJDEP August 2016 (delayed from May to enable discussions
ahead of submittal) Final FS November 2016
Proposed Plan Draft to NJDEP December 2016 Final PP (and public meeting) April 2017
Record of Decision Draft to NJDEP July 2017 Final ROD November 2017
Remedial Action Winter 2017/2018
45“WIN AS ONE”
Dix Update Air Sparge Systems (TU019a, TU970, NW044)
AS/SVE systems operational at all three sites.
47“WIN AS ONE”
Dix New Egypt Armory Removal Action
Remedial Action Report and ESD (update to the Decision Document) for Land Use Controls under the building on-site has been approved by DEP
Response Complete status by 30 September 2016 for removal action phase
New task started to assess if metals and other chemicals present near the site at Jumping Brook are at naturally occurring levels/background
51“WIN AS ONE”
NW042 (0900 Area)Likely Proposed Remedy
Groundwater No Action Required (meets applicable standards)
Soil In-Situ soil mixing combined with soil compliance
averaging to address pesticides and reduce overall concentrations at the site to below residential standards
End Point Objectives Unrestricted/residential use
53“WIN AS ONE”
NW042 (0900 Area)Schedule
Final Proposed Plan/Public Meeting Jan 2017
Final Record of Decision Jun 2017
Final Remedial Design Dec 2017
Remedial Action Feb 2018
54“WIN AS ONE”
Lakehurst Update
Areas A/B and C Semi-Annual sampling completed in
April 2016 and planned for October 2016
Active remedies being designed for 4 sites to meet GW standards by 2021
Pre-Design investigations complete at 3 sites. 1 investigation remaining
Pilot Studies being conducted at 3 sites in August 2016
MNA remedies approved from 2 sites to meet GW standards by 2021
Area D Annual GW sampling in October
2016
55“WIN AS ONE”
Lakehurst Update
Area H Active pump and treat system
continues to operate Semi-Annual sampling
completed in April 2016 and planned for October 2016
Areas I/J and K Annual GW sampling in
October 2016
56“WIN AS ONE”
JB MDL - Basewide1,4-Dioxane Sampling Plan
1,4-dioxane is an emerging contaminant and was used as a stabilizer in solvents such at TCE
A workplan is under development to determine if 1,4-dioxane is present at sites with a history of solvent use across JB MDL
Sampling is anticipated to be conducted in the Fall of 2016
57“WIN AS ONE”
Dix SA018 and LF016 Remedies
Proposed remedy is No Action at SA018 (ANC-2 Disposal Area) and Institutional Controls and groundwater monitoring at LF016 (Range Landfill)
Record of Decision (ROD) is in preparation – will include responsiveness summary addressing oral and written comments received during the Public Meeting held 12 May and the 30 day comment period
SA018
LF016