Dioxin in Feed Fats from Schleswig-Holstein
Situation Report of the Federal Government
& First Conclusions
As per 10. January 2011
Dr.Michael Winter
2
Outline
• State of play– Feed fats– Compound feedingstuffs
• Results of the investigation• Regulatory action• Conclusions
Dr.Michael Winter
3
Trigger:
Self-checking of a compound feed producer:1,56 ng/kg PCDD/F – WHO TEQCompound feed, produced using feed fat from thefeed fat manufacturer in Uetersen
Analytical findings on 21.12.2010Information of the authority on 22.12.2010
Cause: Contaminated feed fat
State of Play
Dr.Michael Winter
4
Feed Fat Producerin UetersenTrader O.
Rotterdam, NL Logistic L.Bösel
Bio Gas Oil Producer P.
Emden
Lieferung von 7 * 25 t
Technische
7 deliveries ofa total of 179.2 tof technical mixed fatty acids from 11.11. to
16.11.2010
25 compound feed producers in GER (from 12.11.2010 to 23.12.2010)
No supply of feed fat to other member states or to third countries
2,256 t of feed fat
Technical fats => Feed fatsState of Play
Dr.Michael Winter
5
North-Rhine-Westphalia (2)
Lower Saxony(20)
Feed Fat ProducerUetersen (Logistic/Bösel)
Feed fats => compound feed
Hamburg (1) Saxony-Anhalt(2)
Compound feed with a 2-10% share of contaminated feed fat to: 4,760 agricultural holdings in five German Länder
(Poultry fattening, laying hens, pig fattening, cattle fattening, dairy herds, rabbit fattening)
State of Play
Dr.Michael Winter
6
Analytical findings of the reserve samples of the Feed Fat plant in Uetersen (as per 5.1.2011)
179.92Total
2.462.01Technical mixed fatty acid
26.707.12.2010
2.692.43Technical mixed fatty acid24.323.12.2010
2.872.27Technical mixed fatty acid
24.681.12.2010
150.00149.00Technical mixed fatty acid
25.7225.11.2010
151.00150.00Technical mixed fatty acid
27.0019.11.2010
141140142.00141.00Technical mixed fatty acid25.1412.11.2010
9190124.00123.00Technical mixed fatty acid26.3611.11.2010
Total Dioxin dl-PCB ng/kg TE-WHO
Dioxin ng/kg TE-WHO
Total Dioxin dl-PCB ng/kg TE-WHO
Dioxin ng/kg TE-WHO
Subsequent testingInitial testing
NameQuantity in tDate of
Delivery
Results of the Investigation
Dr.Michael Winter
7
0,50112.11.201026.320HJ 20 P
5,2419.11.201027.320HJ 15 SRP
8,0716.11.201027.600HJ 15 SRP
3,7816.11.201027.260HJ 15 SRP
1,0512.11.201027.500HJ 15 SRP
7,8712.11.201026.960HJ 15 SRP
0,43323.12.201025.72010596
0,62120.12.201010.68010530
0,64815.12.201010.04010530
0,64815.12.201011.22010530
36,0025.11.20107.88010530
6,9925.11.201027.00010532
Dioxine in ng PCDD/F -
WHO -TEQ/kgLieferdatumMenge in kgArtikel
Analytic results of the manufactured feed fats following the inspectionof the reserve samples of the feed fat plant (as per 6.1.2011).
0.50112.11.201026,320HJ 20 P
5.2419.11.201027,320HJ 15 SRP
8.0716.11.201027,600HJ 15 SRP
3.7816.11.201027,260HJ 15 SRP
1.0512.11.201027,500HJ 15 SRP
7.8712.11.201026,960HJ 15 SRP
0.43323.12.201025,72010596
0.62120.12.201010,68010530
0.64815.12.201010,04010530
0.64815.12.201011,22010530
36. .0025.11.20107,88010530
6.9925.11.201027,00010532
Dioxins in ng PCDD/F -
WHO -TEQ/kg
Date of delivery
Quantity in kgItem
0.56117.11.201025,000HJ 2 SRP
36.0025.11.20107,880HJ 2 SRP
7.5619.11.201026,420HJ 25 SRP
6.9518.11.201010,000HJ 2 SRP
28.716.11.20109,980HJ 25 SRP
16.716.11.201025,440HJ 25 SRP
12.819.11.201027,290HJ 15 SRP
0.58617.11.201026,980HJ 25 SRP
10.515.11.201026,910HJ 25 SRP
4.320.11.201027,280HJ 20 P
11.713.11.201027,380HJ 20 P
4.3619.11.201026,460HJ 20 P
0.90616.11.201026,600HJ 20 P
Dioxins in ng
PCDD/F -WHO -TEQ/kgDate of delivery
Quantity in kgItem
Results of the Investigation
Dr.Michael Winter
8
Development of the residues in feed fatofficial analyses
0
20
40
60
80
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53
samples
ng/k
g di
oxin
(who
-teq)
Anl.3
Dr.Michael Winter
9
0,156 (+/- 0,047)0,086 (+/- 0,026)Ferkelaufzuchtfutter II00311 /004110,51 (+/- 0,15)0,41 (+/- 0,12)Broilerendmastfutter00111 / 00211-0,056 (+/- 0,008)Ergänzungsfuttermittel MilchküheMF 1016.00/11-0,065 (+/- 0,010)
Ergänzungsfuttermittel MastschweineMF 1015.00/11
-0,065 (+/- 0,010)Alleinfuttermittel ZuchtsauenMF 1014.00/11-0,328 (+/- 0,049)Alleinfuttermittel ZuchtsauenMF 1013.00/11-0,214 (+/- 0,032)
Ergänzungsfuttermittel ZuchtschweineMF 1012.00/11
-0,063 (+/- 0,009)Alleinfuttermittel ZuchtsauenMF 1011.00/11-0,313 (+/- 0,05)PflanzenölMF 1106.00/11-0,054 (+/- 0,008)Alleinfuttermittel für LegehennenMF 1010.00/11-0,057 (+/- 0,009)Alleinfuttermittel für LegehennenMF 1009.00/11-0,048 (+/- 0,007)Alleinfuttermittel für LegehennenMF 1008.00/11-0,044 (+/- 0,007)Ergänzungsfuttermittel Milchkühe MF 1007.00/11-0,130 (+/- 0,020)FerkelaufzuchtfutterMF 1002.00/11-0,122 (+/- 0,018) LegehennenfutterMF 1001.00/11
Summe Dioxine und dl PCB in ng PCDD/F und
PCB WHO - TEQ/kg
Dioxin in ngPCDD/F - WHO -
TEQ/kgMischfuttermittelNr.
Dr.Michael Winter
10
Test results for eggs (as per 8.1.2011)
1 [6%]>12 pg/g
3 [16%]
6-12 pg/g
14 [78%]
3-6 pg/g
18182157
Number of samples withconcentrationsabove themaximum residuelevel of 3 pgWHO-PCDD/F-TEQ per g Fett
Number of samples withconcentrationsabove the actionlevel and belowthe maximumresidue level
Number of samples withconcentrationsbelow the actionlevel
Number of samples
Results of the Investigation
Dr.Michael Winter
11
Test results for laying hens (as per 8.1.2011)
11Total11North-Rhine-Westphalia
Number of samples above themaximum residue level
Number of samplesFederal Land
03Total03Hessia
Number of samples above themaximum residue level
Number of samplesFederal Land
Test results for chickens for fattening (as per 8.1.2011)
Test results for fattening turkeys (as per 10.1.2011)
Results of the Investigation
04Total
03North-Rhine-Westphalia
01Lower saxony
Numbeer of samoles above themaximim residue level
Number of samolesFederal Land
Dr.Michael Winter
12
Test results for pigs (as per 10.1.2011)
Test results for cow milk (as per 10.1.2011)
Results of the Investigation
013Total04Saxona -Anhaltina08Northrhine-Westfalia01Lower Saxony
Number of samples above themaximum residue level
Number of samplesFederal Land
016Total
010Northrhine-Westfalia n
06Lower Saxony
Number of samples above themaximum residue level
Number of samplesFederal Land
Dr.Michael Winter
13
01Total
01Lower Saxony
Number of samples abovethe maximum residuelevel
Number of samplesFederal
Test results for cattle (as per 10.1.2011)
Results of the Investigation
Dr.Michael Winter
14
Regulatory action prior to the lifting of restrictions on closed farms
• Analysis of reserve samples of feedingstuffs and feed fats
• Analysis of foods• Calculation of the dioxin levels of
feed batches already consumed• Linking feed batches to holdings on
the basis of supply data• Cross-linking this information to
produce individual risk assessments
Regulatory Action I
Dr.Michael Winter
15
Seite 15
558Total
0Thuringia
62Schleswig-Holstein
13Saxony-Anhalt
4Saxony
0Saarland
0Rhineland-Palatinate
143North Rhine-Westphalia
330Lower Saxony
7Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania
1Hessen
0Hamburg
0Bremen
1Brandenburg
0Berlin
0Bavaria
1Baden-Wuerttemberg
Closed farms
As per: 10.1.2011Federal Land
Regulatory Action II
143
330
762
1
1
1
4
13
Dr.Michael Winter
16 Regulatory Action III
55801893461233239´Total
119.1.2010Thuringia
626119.1.2010Schleswig-Holstein
136439.1.2010Saxony-Anhalt
09.1.2010Saxony
09.1.2010Saarland
09.1.2010Rhineland-Palatinate
14389118539.1.2010North Rhine-Westphalia
33015811227339.1.2010Lower Saxony
7259.1.2010Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania
119.1.2010Hessen
09.1.2010Hamburg
09.1.2010Bremen
119.1.2010Brandenburg
09.1.2010Berlin
09.1.2010Bavaria
119.1.2010Baden-Wuerttemberg
Ducks/geese
Fattening rabbit
Fattening cattle
Dairy cattlePigs
Fattening
turkeys
Chickens for
fatteningLaying hens
TotalType of production
As perName of the Land
Information on the scope of the closure of agricultural holdings in Germany, As per: 10.1.2011, 19:00 hrs
Dr.Michael Winter
17 Conclusions I
• Separation of product flowsSeparate the processing of technical fats which arepossibly contaminated from the processing of fatswhich are intended for the feed chain and eventuallyfor the food chain
• More stringent requirement of official approvalfor holdings which supply raw materials to thefeed industry
• Binding positive list for individual feedingstuffsat European level
Dr.Michael Winter
18
• Put rules on liability for sanctions to the test
Effects of such incidents– No longer only local, but also supraregional
and sometimes even global – With regard to both health and macroeconomic
adverse impacts. – Entire industries affected and adversely
impacted without being responsible for anyculpable negligence
Conclusions II
Dr.Michael Winter
19 Conclusions III
• Continue to reinforce dioxinmonitoring
– Record the contamination situationeven better
– Aim to integrate all test results, including the self-checking of companies