2010 Olympics Integrated
Interoperable Communications
Plan (IICP)
2009 Annual NWTEMC ConferenceOctober 6th, 2009
2
2010 OLYMPICS
Interoperable Communications Preparedness
2010 Olympics Overview
3
2010 Olympics Overview
Objectives: Familiarize participants with factual details about 2010
Olympics Provide background on Washington state security planning
efforts to date including preparations for 2010 Olympics Provide a brief overview of the 2010 Olympics Coordination
Center
4
Vancouver, B.C. • February 12-28, 2010
2010 Olympics Overview
5
2010 Olympics Overview
2009 World Police and Fire Games
2010 Winter Olympic Games
2010 Paralympic Games
Jul 31 to Aug 9, 2009 Burnaby BC Third largest sporting
event in the world
Feb 12 to 28, 2010 Vancouver and
Whistler, BC 5,500 athletes and
officials (projected) 80+ countries
participating
March 12 to 21, 2010 Whistler, BC 1,350 athletes and
officials (projected) 40+ countries
participating
6
80+ countries expected to participate 5,500 athletes 25,000 volunteers West Vancouver Richmond Whistler
2010 Olympics Overview
7
Attendance
1 million in Turin, Italy in 2006 Whatcom County Council of Governments
estimates 450,000 spectators 175,000 expected to drive north into Canada
on the I-5
2010 Olympics Overview
8
What are some of the potential threats that you might anticipate during an event like the 2010 Olympics?
How might these events impact Washington state?
2010 Olympics Overview
9
Though a variety of incidents could occur, the 2010 Olympics Training and Exercise Working Group decided to focus efforts upon the following incidents:
Severe Winter Weather Chemical Spill Civil Disturbance International Terrorism Domestic Terrorism
2010 Olympics Overview
10
What kind of impact do you think any of these events could have on tribes and/or local response agencies?
What kind of reaction could be expected from the public?
What kind of media response could be expected if any of these incidents occurred?
2010 Olympics Overview
11
Potential impacts of an incident on Washington
2010 Olympics Overview
Stress to the medical system
Disruption of economy Destruction of critical
infrastructure Injuries and loss of life Public fear Response hampered by
inability of agencies to communicate
12
What has Washington State done to prepare?
2010 Olympics Security Task Force established in 2004 Training and Exercise Working Group Intelligence Working Group Communications Interoperability Working Group Statewide training International exercises Partnerships with Canadian, Federal, State, Regional
and Local agencies
2010 Olympics Overview
13
State of Washington
2010 Olympic & ParalympicWinter Games Task Force
TradeTradeTourismTourism TransportationTransportationSecuritySecurity
2010 Task Force2010 Task Force
Planning and OperationsPlanning and Operations
Intelligence Information Analysis &Sharing
Intelligence Information Analysis &Sharing
Communications Interoperability
Communications Interoperability
Logistics & Finance/ Administration
Logistics & Finance/ Administration
Training & ExerciseTraining & Exercise
Public InformationPublic Information
Co-Leads:Charlie Radabaugh, FBI Robert Schwent, WSP
Co-Leads:Charlie Radabaugh, FBI Robert Schwent, WSP
2010 Olympics Overview
14
2010 Olympics Overview
Communications Interoperability Working Group Identify what communications tools are in place Define the communications requirements for 2010 Olympics
Communications Coordination Center Develop the 2010 Olympics Integrated Interoperable
Communications Plan (IICP) to include Federal, State, local and tribal emergency response agencies
Ensure that tribal, local, state, federal and regional agencies are engaged in the process and familiar with the plan
Provide training and exercises to ensure that response agencies can effectively communicate during the Games using the 2010 Olympics IICP
15
2010 Coordination Center Overview
Developed to provide a system composed of facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures and communications for participation of Washington agencies in 2010 Olympics-related incidents
The facility will provide logistical and communications capabilities to support critical missions
The facility will be staffed by local, state and federal agencies
2010 Olympics Overview
16
Summary
The CIWG sub-committee is focused upon HOW you communicate, WHO you communicate with and WHAT methods you use to support that communication during incidents
2010 Olympics Overview
17
Introduction to the 2010 Olympics
Integrated Interoperable
Communications Plan (IICP)
2010 OLYMPICS
Interoperable Communications Preparedness
18
Overview of the IICP
IICP Purpose
To define the communications capabilities necessary to support and execute interagency communications among Federal, State, tribal, local, private sector and Canadian partner emergency response providers participating in U. S. preparations for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympics Games
19
Overview of the IICP
IICP Scope
Identify current communications systems and capabilities that support mission operations
Define communications pathways based on five specific incident scenarios selected by the 2010 Olympics Security Committee
Document communications pathways and methods that connect command and control centers (e. g. the 2010 Olympics Coordination Center), EOCs, and field forces with voice and data communications
20
Overview of the IICP
U. S. and Washington State Focus Area Homeland Security (HLS) Regions 1, 2, 5 & 6
Proximity to the U. S. – Canadian borderMajor transportation routes (land, air, and water-based)
HLS Region 1
Counties of:Island
San JuanSkagit
SnohomishWhatcom
HLS Region 2
Counties of:Clallam
JeffersonKitsap
HLS Region 5
Pierce County
HLS Region 6
King County
21
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 2:Regional Scenario Based Communications Plans
Introduction Provision of critical organizational, operational, and technical
information required to establish interoperable communications Communications Plans are tailored for specific events Can be used to further agency training and readiness by applying the
information to the most probable events in a Region as well as recurring events
22
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 2:Regional Scenario Based Communications Plans
Regional Specific InformationLocal/County interoperability within the RegionLocal/County interoperability with State and Federal agenciesTribal, NGO and private industry interoperability with the RegionPrimary communications centers and contingency back upContingency communications (e. g. radio cache)Commercial services, deployable assets and satellite communications
23
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 2:Regional Scenario Based Communications Plans Scenarios
Severe Winter Weather Event Major Hazardous Materials Release Civil Disturbance International Terrorism Domestic Terrorism
24
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 2:Regional Scenario Based Communications Plans Scenario Components –
Sample incident response structure Incident
CommanderAPD
OperationsAPD
LogisticsUS Fish & Wildlife
PlanningFBI
PIOMOA EOC
SafetyAFD
Perimeter ControlNational Guard
Crowd Disbursement
APD
Medical AFD
25
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 2:Regional Scenario Based Communications Plans Scenario Components – Sample Table X
Scenario Components – Table X
Agencies Region County DisciplineHF
CON
V
VHF
CONV
VHF
CONV
MAR
INE
VHF
CONV
AIR
UHF
CONV
800
MHZ
TRU
NKED
800
MHZ
CON
V
VHF
TRUN
KED
UCAL
L 40
UTAC
41-
43
VCAL
L 10
VTAC
11-
14
CEM
NET
DNR
HEAR
IWN
LERN
NLEC
OSCC
R
REDN
ET/F
IREC
OM
SAR
STAE
N (1
90 S
TAEN
)
STAT
EOPS
1 &
4 (F
ire/E
MS)
STAT
EOPS
2 &
5 (L
E)
STAT
EOPS
3 (G
en. G
ov.)
CANA
M
OPSC
AN
TRIS
HSIN
22
NLET
S23
NCIC
24
WIS
N25
WAS
IS
WEB
EOC
N N N N S S S S S S S S S S S S S R R R N
Blaine Fire Rescue 1 Whatcom Fire XBlaine PD 1 Whatcom LE X X X X
CBP 1 Whatcom LE X X X X X X X X X X ¶ ¶ ¶ X X X ¶ ¶ X X
FBI 6 King LE X X X X X X X X XNorth Whatcom County Fire & Rescue 1 Whatcom Fire EMSState EOC-Reader Boards 3 Thurston EOC X X X X X X X X XWhatcom EOC 1 Whatcom EOC X X X X XWhatcom Sheriff 1 Whatcom LE X X X X X X X XWhat-COMM 911 1 Whatcom LE X X X X X X X XWSDOT 1 Whatcom Trans X X X X XWSP 1 Snohomish LE X X X X X X X X X X X X
N: National S: State R: Regional X: Available ¶: Can be Programmed
DAY-TO-DAY INTEOPERABLE COMMS PUBLIC SAFETY DATA
26
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 2:Regional Scenario Based Communications Plans Scenario Components – Emergency Contact Info
Agency name Contact (individual’s name) Individual’s position Work phone & alternate Email Primary dispatch center 24/7 contact number (for after hours contact)
27
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 2:Regional Scenario Based Communications Plans Scenario Components – Sample Form 205
28
Overview of the IICP
IICP Elements – Part 3: Appendices
AppendicesMaster Freq List and I/O Talk Groups for HLS Regions 1, 2, 5, and 6Communication system coverage maps, listings of current MOUs, MOAs,
existing interoperability/communications plans and SOPs2010 Olympics Emergency Communication Points of Contact ListIICP Agency Contributor Points of Contact ListCommunications Training and Exercise PlanningAcronyms Listing and Master List of Exhibits
29
Overview of the IICP
IICP Future Additions List points of contact for critical infrastructure Listing of key regional communications managers Provide a Communications Annex to bridge the 2010
OCC CONOPS with Canadian, Federal, State, local, and tribal tactical communications operations
Finalize the 2010 OCC information flow (in/out of facility) Any HLS Region 1, 2, 5, or 6 current system upgrade
and/or expansion information
30
2010 Olympics Integrated Interoperable Communications Plan
31
Overview of the IICP
Region 1 Communications Interoperability Gaps Still too many disparate systems – makes interoperability
problematic No common protocol for radio programming of
interoperability channels Limited training and resources to do so Limited available radio caches to support mutual aid
between Regions National interoperability channels are not programmed
into many of the subscriber units Line A constraints (limits use of OSCCR)
32
2010 OLYMPICS
Interoperable Communications Preparedness
Tribal Input for 2010
Olympics Integrated
Interoperable Communications
Plan (IICP)
33
Tribal Input for 2010 Olympics IICP
Purpose: Gain input from tribal first responders on communications
capabilities for specific information to include in the 2010 IICP To confirm that this initial-response role of tribal first
responders is captured in the 2010 Olympics Interoperable Communications Plan
Validate tribal first responder response capabilities including both equipment and volunteer resource capacity
Identify cross-border resource and response capabilities To define the role of the tribal first responders and how you
are involved in future planning
34
Tribal Input for 2010 Olympics IICP
How do tribal first responders in your region coordinate communications for multi-agency events? Standard, day-to-day operating procedures Unusual circumstances What if there is a major/multi-agency event? How do you support EOCs and NGOs during
emergencies?
35
Tribal Input for 2010 Olympics IICP
Overview of tribal first responders regional deployable communications assets Who owns them? What are their capabilities? Do the assets include trained personnel? What is the request process? How do you determine when to deploy them? What is the process to request your assistance?
36
Tribal Input for 2010 Olympics IICP
Cross border Resource Capabilities: When is the type of incident that would require cross
border communication assistance from tribal first responders?
Who is the decision maker on establishing cross border interoperability?
How long after an incident starts are you called?
37
Tribal Input for 2010 Olympics IICP
Tribal First Responders Specific Response to Emergencies: What is your protocol for response?
Discuss specific county/regional response What are your volunteer resource capabilities? What are your equipment capabilities by region? Is there a written response plan by Region? How are tribal first responders involved in Regional
planning?
38
Tribal Input for 2010 Olympics IICP
What information to include in the IICP? What resources should be identified in the IICP? What equipment should be included in the IICP? Suggestions on updates to the IICP?
39
Tribal Input for 2010 Olympics IICP
Are there Communication Gaps? What communication gaps exist? What are tribal first responder identified communication
gaps? Are there any exercise/training gaps? Who do you take the lead from? How do you interoperate across regions? Are there cross-border gaps?
40
2010 OLYMPICS
Interoperable Communications Preparedness
Questions?