Download pptx - 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Transcript
Page 1: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 1. Emily Heaton next to a stand of Giant Miscanthus on Caveny Farm, Monticello, IL. Each mark on the post = 1 foot. Photo Credit: John Caveny

Page 2: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 2. Approximate growing range of Giant Miscanthus in the US. Giant Miscanthus is best suited for areas with at least 30 inches of rain per year, with better results as rainfall increases. Giant Miscanthus can tolerate wet soils and dry matter yield is directly correlated to seasonal precipitation.

Page 3: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 3. The average annual biomass yields of Giant Miscanthus and switchgrass harvested from 3 locations in Illinois during 2004-2006 (adapted from Heaton et al, 2008).

Page 4: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 4. Representation of the hybrid origins of Giant Miscanthus (M. x giganteus), a naturally occurring hybrid grass first collected in Asia for use as an ornamental plant, and more recently for bioenergy.

Page 5: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 5. The pictures show steps in the propagation of Giant Miscanthus dug from the field then propagated in the greenhouse. The white, cone-shaped structures are small rhizomes, the primary reproductive organ for Giant Miscanthus.Photo credit: Emily Heaton.

Page 6: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 5. Projected peak dry matter yields of Giant Miscanthus in Illinois (adapted from Heaton et al., (2004)).

Page 7: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 4. A variety of conventional hay forage equipment is suitable for Giant Miscanthus harvest. Photo credits: Emily Heaton and Carl Hart.

Page 8: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Figure 5. Proximate analysis of Giant Miscanthus harvested from Caveny Farms and the University of Illinois. Reduced ash contents in the Caveny Farm feedstock may result from chopping instead of mowing and baling the feedstock, thus avoiding soil contamination. Provided courtesy of Caveny Farms.

Page 9: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Table 4. Annual and extended project costs and profits for two cropping systems in central Illinois over a 10 year period (Heaton et al. 2004).

Page 10: 2009 Msu Miscanthus Figures

Recommended