1 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
ITRS 2005 - Environmental, Safety and Health Chapter
ITRS Conference, San Francisco, CaliforniaJuly 13, 2005
Jim Jewett, Intel
2 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
ITRS ConferenceESH Chapter Participants
• ESIA – Hans-Peter Bipp (Infineon)
• JSIA – Takayuki Oogoshi (NEC)
– Tetsu Tomine (Epson)
• SIA – Jim Jewett (Intel) – Walter Worth (Sematech)
3 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Agenda• Difficult Challenges
• ESH Technology Engagement Model
• Key ESH Focus
• Supplemental ESH Tools
4 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
ESH Difficult Challenges(2005 Proposed)
• Chemical and Materials Management
• Process and Equipment Management
• Facilities Energy and Water Optimization
• Sustainability and Product Stewardship
5 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Chemical and Materials Management
– New chemical assessment– Chemical data collection– Chemical exposure management
6 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Process and Equipment Management
– Chemical reduction – Environment management– Water and energy conservation– Consumables optimization– By-products management– Chemical exposure management– Equipment ergonomics– Design for maintenance
7 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Facilities Energy and Water Optimization
– Conservation [energy and water]– Heat removal– Global warming emissions reduction
8 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Sustainability and Product Stewardship
– End-of-life disposal/reclaim– Product content/material declaration– Design for ESH– Process chemistries– Device power requirements– Supply chain issues
Optimum Time to effect
changes in ESH technology
ESH/Fab Technology Engagement Model
YEARS to High Volume Manufacturing
Ab
ility
to E
ffect
ES
H Im
pro
vem
ent
s
6 4 2 0
Manufacturing RampSupplier R&DExternal Research Process Development
Commercialization Phases Demonstration Ramp to HVMResearchSource: Intel
Equipment/Chemical set defined and
characterized
Minimal flexibility to
develop alternative
material ESH solutions
--
Tools
Universities and Government Labs
Universities and Government Labs
Technology Development/ESH Intersect Model
YEARS to High Volume Manufacturing
Ab
ility
to E
ffect
ES
H Im
pro
vem
ent
s
6 4 2 0
Manufacturing Ramp
Winnow OptionsBgn Mat/Supl Selct
Mat/Supl Selct
Ramp to HVM
Proof of ConceptMaterial Development
Source: Intel
Optimum lead-time to anticipate
impacts & identify ESH improvement
needs
Where we operate today
Supplier R&DExternal Research Process Development
11 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Key ESH Focus1. Lithography
• PFOS alternatives development• Energy requirements• Immersion Lithography (Types of fluids and additives)
2. Factory Integration• Impact of 450 mm tools• POU abatement • Concentration of pollutants due to water conservation
3. Interconnect• CMP consumables reduction• New deposition process materials
4. Front End Processing• Process Complexity• Increase in aqueous cleaning/stripping requirements• New and novel materials
12 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Key ESH Focus (Cont’d)
5. Emerging Research Materials• Nanotechnology ESH research needs
6. Yield• Water conservation may impact yield
7. Assembly & Packaging• Product content• PFC use
13 DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005
Supplemental Files
Two overriding issues regarding chemicals and materials:
• Selection• Utilization
Reference Files• Chemical Restrictions• Materials of Concern• Codes, Standards and Permits
Issues & Characterization
Show Stopper High Restriction Potential Medium Restriction Potential
List of Chemicals or Raw Materials Subject to Actual or Potential Manufacture or Use Restrictions
Asbestos MaterialsCertain glycol ethersPolychlorinated biphenylsFully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)Carbon tetrachloride1,1,1 trichloroethane Halons 1211, 1301, 2402Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs)HCFC 141bPolybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) and their ethers/oxides (PBDEs)Cadmium compoundsLead compoundsMercury compoundsHexavalent Chromium compoundsPolychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)/ Terphenyls (PCT) Polychlorinated Naphthalene (PCN)Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (C10-13, Cl >50%)Tributyl tin (TBT) and, Triphenyl tin (TPT) compoundsCertain Azo Colorants
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)Perfluorooctyl sulfonates (PFOS) Cadmium compoundsLead compoundsMercury compoundsHexavalent Chromium compounds
Perfluorocompounds (PFCs) - SF6 - C4F10 - C2F6 - C5F12 - CF4 - C6F14 - NF3 - C4F8 - CHF3 - C3F8Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and its saltsCertain phthalatesPhenolsPerfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFAS)Ethylene OxideEthylene Chloride
Items are listed in red if the restriction potential applies only if the material is contained in the final product, whereas process use of the material may be acceptable if it is not contained in the final product. Items listed in blue are those which have restrictions if the material is simply used in the process, but a different level of restriction if included in the final product. Items listed in black have the same restriction level regardless of whether its included in the final product.The tool is meant to focus only on the potential for legal limitations on the use of a substance, and is not meant to substitute for the broader risk assessment or for the more thorough EHS review performed as part of chemical use approval.
Items are listed in red if the restriction potential applies only if the material is contained in the final product, whereas process use of the material may be acceptable if it is not contained in the final product. Items listed in blue are those which have restrictions if the material is simply used in the process, but a different level of restriction if included in the final product. Items listed in black have the same restriction level regardless of whether its included in the final product.The tool is meant to focus only on the potential for legal limitations on the use of a substance, and is not meant to substitute for the broader risk assessment or for the more thorough EHS review performed as part of chemical use approval.
Potential Chemical Restrictions TablePotential Chemical Restrictions Table
DRAFT – Work In Progress - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 13 July 2005