1
Corruption
Chapter 10
2
What are the two principle schemes involving bribery?
Pop Quiz
3
Learning Objectives
• Define corruption.• Identify the four categories of corruption.• Define bribery.• Compare and contrast bribery, extortion, and illegal
gratuities.• Identify the two categories of bribery schemes.• Understand kickback schemes and how they are
committed.• Understand bid-rigging schemes and explain how they are
categorized.
4
Learning Objectives• Describe the types of abuses that are committed at each
stage of the competitive bidding process.• Be familiar with the controls and techniques that can be
used to prevent and detect bribery.• Define conflicts of interest.• Differentiate conflicts of interest from bribery schemes
and billing schemes.• List and understand the two major categories of conflicts
of interest.• Be familiar with proactive audit tests that can be used to
detect corruption schemes.
5
CorruptionCorruption
Conflicts ofInterest
Conflicts ofInterest
PurchaseSchemesPurchaseSchemes
BriberyBriberyIllegal
GratuitiesIllegal
GratuitiesEconomicExtortionEconomicExtortion
SalesSchemes
SalesSchemes
OtherOther
InvoiceKickbacks
InvoiceKickbacks
Bid RiggingBid Rigging
OtherOther
6
85.7%92.7%
12.8%
30.1%
5.1%
7.9%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
AssetMisappropriation
Corruption
FraudulentStatements
2002 2004
Frequency of Types of Occupational Fraud and Abuse
7
Median Loss of Types of Occupational Fraud and Abuse
$80,000 $93,000
$530,000
$250,000
$4,250,000
$1,000,000
$- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000
AssetMisappropriation
Corruption
FraudulentStatements
2002 2004
8
Dollar Loss Range from Corruption Schemes
14.6%30.1%
6.8%7.5%
29.2%35.6%
12.9%11.0%
22.8%11.0%
12.3%3.4%
1.4%1.4%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
1,000,000 and up
500,000 - 999,999
100,000 - 499,999
50,000 - 99,999
10,000 - 49,999
1,000 - 9,999
1-999
All Cases Corruption
9
Frequency of Corruption Schemes
17.6%
24.8%
40.5%
56.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Extortion
Gratuities
Bribery
Conflicts
10
Median Loss Corruption Schemes
$275,000
$275,000
$300,000
$285,000
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000
Extortion
Gratuities
Bribery
Conflicts
11
0.9%2.8%
5.1%9.0%
6.2%9.0%
7.8%9.7%
10.9%11.8%
18.4%13.2%
21.3%13.2% 23.6%
29.2%23.8%
26.4%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Law Enforcement
Anonymous Tip
Tip from Vendor
Tip from Customer
External Audit
Internal Control
By Accident
Tip from Employee
Internal Audit
All Cases Corruption
Detection of Corruption Schemes
12
Perpetrators of Corruption Schemes
12.4%21.2%
34.0%47.3%
67.8%56.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Owner
Manager
Employee
All Cases Corruption
13
Median Loss by Perpetrator
$900,000$1,500,000
$140,000
$225,000
$62,000$200,000
$0 $300,000 $600,000 $900,000 $1,200,000 $1,500,000
Owner
Manager
Employee
All Cases Corruption
14
Size of Victim in Corruption Schemes
13.6%19.7%20.3%
23.8%21.5%
18.4%44.6%38.1%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
10,000+
1,000 - 9,999
100 - 999
1 - 99
Nu
mb
er o
f E
mp
loye
es
All Cases Corruption
15
$105,500$300,000
$87,500$173,500
$78,500$200,000
$98,000$342,500
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000
10,000+
1,000 - 9,999
100 - 999
1 - 99
All Cases Corruption
Median Loss by Number of Employees in Corruption Schemes
16
Bribery
• Offering, giving, receiving or soliciting any thing of value to influence an official act
• Buys influence of the recipient
• Commercial bribery
• Kickbacks
• Bid-rigging schemes
17
Kickback Schemes
• Involve submission of invoices for goods and services that are either overpriced or completely fictitious
• Involve collusion between employees and vendors• Almost always attack the purchasing function of
the victim company
18
Kickback Schemes
• Diverting business to venders– Vendor pays the kickbacks to ensure a steady
stream of business from the purchasing company
– No incentive to provide quality merchandise or low price
– Almost always leads to overpaying of goods or services
19
Overbilling Schemes
• Employees with approval authority– Vendor submits inflated invoices to the victim
company– Overstates the cost of actual goods or services
or reflect fictitious sales– Ability to authorize purchases is key to the
scheme
20
Overbilling Schemes
• Employees lacking approval authority– Circumvents purchasing controls– May prepare false vouchers to make it appear
that the invoice is legitimate– May forge an approval signature or have access
to a restricted password in a computerized system
– Difficult to detect since the victim company is being attacked from two directions
21
Other Kickback Schemes
• Discounts are given in exchange for bribes
• Slush funds– Other side of the transaction– Funds can be paid from other accounts or paid
as “consulting fees”
22
Detecting Kickbacks
• Normal controls may not detect kickbacks schemes
• Look for price inflation• Monitor trends in cost of goods sold and services
purchased– Often starts small but increases over time
23
Detecting Kickbacks
• Look for excessive quantities purchased• Investigate inventory shortages• Look for inferior goods purchased • Compare actual to budgeted amounts
24
Preventing Kickbacks• Assign an employee independent of the purchasing
department to routinely review buying patterns• Make sure that all contracts have a “right to audit” clause• Establish written policies prohibiting employees from
soliciting or accepting any gift or favor form a customer or supplier
• Expressly forbid any employee from engaging in any transaction on behalf of the company who has an undisclosed personal interest in the transaction
• Implement an ethics policy that clearly explains what improper behavior is and provides grounds for termination if an employee accepts a bribe or kickback
25
Bid-Rigging Schemes• All bidders are expected to be on an even playing
field – bidding on the same specifications• The more power a person has over the bidding
process, the more influence he can exert over the selection of the winning bid
• Potential targets include:– Buyers– Contracting officials– Engineers and technical representatives– Quality or produce assurance representatives– Subcontractor liaison employees
26
Pre-Solicitation Phase• Need recognition schemes
– Employee of the purchasing company convinces the company that a particular project is necessary
– Has the specifications tailored to the strengths of a particular supplier
• Trends indicating a need recognition scheme is occurring– Higher requirements for stock and inventory levels– Writing off large numbers of surplus items to scrap– Defining a need that can only be met by a certain
supplier– Failure to develop a satisfactory list of backup suppliers
27
Specification Schemes• Specifications include a list of the elements, materials,
dimensions, and other relevant requirements• Set the specifications to a particular vendor’s capabilities• Use“prequalification” procedures to eliminate certain
vendors• Sole-source or noncompetitive procurement justifications• Deliberately writes vague specifications requiring
amendments at a later date• Bid splitting• Gives a vendor the right to see the specifications before his
competitors get the specs
28
The Solicitation Phase
• Restricting the pool of vendors to choose from• Bid pooling• Fictitious suppliers• Restricting the time for submitting bids• Soliciting bids in obscure publications• Publicizing the bid during holiday periods
29
The Submission Phase
• Fraud in the sealed bid process– Last bid submitted is the one that is awarded the
contract
– Winning bidder finds out what the other competitors are bidding
– Winning bidder may see the other competitors bids before submitting his bid
• Gets help on preparing the bid
30
Detecting Bid-Rigging Schemes• Look for:
– Unusual bidding patterns– Low bids followed by change orders– Very large unexplained price difference among bidders– Contractors who bid last repeatedly receive the
contract– Predictable rotation of bidders– Losing bidders who become subcontractors– Vendors with the same address and phone number– Few bidders for the project– Projects that have been split into smaller ones
31
Something of Value• Cash
• Promises of future employment
• Promise of ownership in the supplier’s firm
• Gifts– Liquor and meals
– Free travel and accommodations
– Cars and other merchandise
– Sexual favors
• Payment of credit card bills
• Loans on very favorable terms
• Transfers of property
32
Something of Value
• Illegal gratuities– Given to reward a decision rather than influence it
– Decision made to benefit a person or company but is not influenced by any sort of payment
– May influence future decisions
• Economic extortion– “Pay up or else”
– Employee demands payment from a vendor in order to make a decision in the vendor’s favor
33
Conflicts of Interest• Employee, manager or executive has an
undisclosed economic or personal interest in a transaction that adversely affects the company
• Victim organization is unaware of the employee’s divided loyalties
• Distinguished from bribery in that conflict of interest the fraudster approves the invoice because of his own hidden interest in the vendor
• Purchasing schemes• Sales schemes
34
Purchasing Schemes• Overbilling schemes
– Bill originates from a real company that the fraudster has an economic or personal interest in the company and is undisclosed to the victim company
– Fraudster uses influence to ensure the victim company does business with a particular vendor
– Does not negotiate in good faith for the employer nor attempts to get the best price
• Turnaround sales– The employee knows that the company is seeking to
purchase a particular asset and purchases it himself– Turns around and sells it to the company at an inflated
price
35
Sales Schemes
• Underbillings– Goods are sold below fair market value to a
vendor in which the perpetrator has a hidden interest
• Writing off sales– Purchases are made from the victim company
and credit memos are then issued later
36
Other Conflict of Interest Schemes
• Business diversions– Siphoning off clients of the victim company to the
employee’s own business
• Resource diversions– Diverting funds and other resources for the
development of the employee’s own company
• Financial disclosures– Inadequate disclosures of related-party transactions to
the company
37
Preventing and Detecting Conflicts of Interest
• Implement, communicate, and enforce an ethics policy that addresses conflicts of interest offenses
• Require employees to complete an annual disclosure statement
• Establish an anonymous reporting mechanism to receive tips and complaints
• Compare vendor address and telephone files to employee address and telephone files for matches