.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Common Mistakes and Exposures
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Disclaimer
Not only are policy forms, clauses, rules and court decisions constantly changing, but forms vary from company to company and state to state.
This book is intended as a general guideline and might not apply to a specific
situation.
Information which is copyrighted by any proprietary to Insurance Services
Office, Inc. (“ISO Material”) is included in this publication. Use of the ISO
Material is limited to ISO Participating Insurers and their Authorized
Representatives. Use by ISO Participating Insurers is limited to use in those
jurisdictions for which the insurer has an appropriate participation with ISO.
Use of the ISO Material by Authorized Representatives is limited to use
solely on behalf of one or more ISO Participating Insurers.
The author and any organization for which this seminar is conducted shall have
neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any
loss or damage alleged to be caused directly or indirectly as a result of
information contained in this book.
[email protected] [email protected]
2
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Reduce Mistakes – Reduce Agency Risk and Loss of Client
90% of E & O claims are caused by a mistake (error) not an omission
More than 50% of all E & O claims derive from failure to recommend coverages, failure to identify exposures or reduction of coverage due to re-marketing at renewal
Today – any account is open to competition
3
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Client Cycle
4
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Transaction Cycle
5
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Account Review
6
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
No Assumptions
7
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
Benefit Plan (401K) changed Client created new plan Fiduciary policy written to cover a specific
plan name only• New plan was not included
Several employees sued employer• No coverage• E & O claim resulted against agent
8
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
Client uses a commercial warehouse to store inventory
Never advises agent – agent never asked Fire at warehouse – Warehouseman’s
coverage did not pay (no legal liability) Client sued agent for E & O – failure to
advise• Claim was settled by E & O carrier
9
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example Client establishes a new company Agent fails to ask about new companies or
ownership at renewal New building is acquired by the new company
and added to the policy• Nobody asked specifically about the owner of the
building
The location and property description is added to the policy – sustains a $500k fire loss• Claim denied
10
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example Building
• A woodworker is a long term tenant in a building where he has operated his business for in excess of twenty years.
• The building owner did not carry fire coverage on their building.
• The woodworker client requested that their agent added the building to their commercial package program.
• The account handler asked for the information regarding the building in terms of value and whether their was any lender. At no time did the account handler ask if the woodworker “owned” the building. The building was added to the policy.
11
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
• The building burned down• Claim denied as the building was not
owned by the insured and was not required by the lease to insure the building
12
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
Insured has 16 vehicles insured on a Business Auto Policy
Remarketed the account at renewal• Post-renewal, employee calls agent
advising that his bank needs evidence of physical damage coverage
That call triggered a question as to the ownership of the vehicles
13
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
The agent determined that all 16 vehicles were owned by employees and lease back to the insured by written contract
Solution—Employee Leased Auto
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Who Is Insured
15
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
The insured was a plastic manufacturer The insured purchased $1,200,000 worth
of equipment for which they secured a bank loan with the equipment securing the loan
The bank sent a standard notice to the insured and insurance agent asking that they be added to the policy as a loss payee
16
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
Within the language of the request they specifically required the attachment of the Lenders Loss Payable form which is “standard” in a collateralized bank loan.
The agent attached a Loss Payable clause instead of the Lenders Loss Payable option.
17
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
The insured was late on their payments to the bank
The bank went to the insured’s location only to find that they had vacated the premises and all of the equipment gone—presumably taken (stolen) by the insured
The bank filed claim under the insured’s policy for their interest as a “lender loss payable”
18
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Where Coverage Is Provided
Mailing Address v. Premises Insured—Suite #, Floor # Property coverage Time Element coverage Liability coverage when Limitation to
Designated Premises endorsement is included
Mailing address match with first named insured
19
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
First Interstate Bank BuildingMay 4, 1988
20
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Where Coverage Is Provided
Where was the property located Are all owned, leased, rented
locations covered Are all locations within the
coverage territory of the policy—Foreign Cover
Are warehouses identified and covered
21
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Mare Island Warehouse FireVallejo, CaliforniaOctober 12, 2005
22
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
The three-alarm fire at Wines Central sent plumes of smoke more than 700 feet high that could be seen for miles. The blaze could not be controlled by firefighters because the Mare Island building structure that once housed Navy torpedoes -- had steel doors and 3-foot-thick concrete walls and a concrete roof that could not be penetrated.
23
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Wines Central converted the 1942 military fortress three years ago into a 240,000-square-foot specialty warehouse that stored more than 500,000 cases of rare vintages believed to be worth up to $100 million, officials said. Clients included wineries, private collectors and some other businesses.
24
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
The scene confronting vintner visitors to Mare Island last week, writes Trent, "was unbelievable. Wine and mold everywhere, the smoke smell almost made me gag and the destruction took your breath away. There are piles and piles of wine from pallets falling over due to water damage, our library area was just a bunch of ash.
25
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Small Mistake
Failure to put the warehouse location on the policy
Failure to add Brand and Label, Control Salvage, Preclude Salvage
26
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
"Insured Location" Provisions Have Winemakers Over a Barrel
27
Begin with fledgling winemaker Allan Christensen, whose first-ever vintage Napa Valley Viognier, which was to have been released under the Amazon Ranch label, is no more. Though the couple paid a premium to insure all of their wine, their policy specified the location where the wine was to be stored -- the Christensen's home, not a warehouse in Vallejo, Christensen explained.News and Comment on California Insurance Law, the Politics of
Insurance, and Other Risky Business 12/21/05
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
"Insured Location" Provisions Have Winemakers Over a Barrel
The 'site-specific' policy would have covered the couple's wine at a different location, had the couple merely notified the insurance company of the change.Some insurance companies are starting to take the hard-line stance that they will only reimburse clients for the quantity of wine that was, according to the fine print, designated for the warehouse.
28
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Where Coverage Is Provided
Limitation of Coverage to Designated Premises This is an unacceptable endorsement
but sometimes the only way the underwriter will take the risk The endorsement language limits
coverage to the described premises – broader description helps, but does NOT overcome the inherent concerns with this endorsement
29
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
What is Covered
Property is insured Property is not insured
• Foundations—no on prop• Foundations—yes on EQ• Foundations—yes for BO
Property insured on the wrong policy• Computer vs. computerized equipment
Property insured on more than one policy• Computer vs.computerized equipment
30
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Building Valuation
COPE information – review limit Covered Property definition – values too
high or too low Underground foundations, underground
piping, excavation, backfilling, pavements, patios, sidewalks, installed refrigeration equipment, outdoor furniture, etc. all excluded
Policy not endorsed to include Limit is adequate – coverage is not
31
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Stock Valuation
32
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Tenant’s Improvements
Trade Fixture vs. Improvements• Removable or not• If not - improvement not trade fixture• Which party should insure – owner /
tenant?• Check lease agreement
33
Tenants Improvements & Building Ordinance
Owner Tenant
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Business Income Valuation
Financial statement Include worksheet for underwriter to
suspend coinsurance Do NOT use for calculation of limit Discuss down time with insured and
extra expenses to relocate• Period of restoration• Additional extended period of indemnity• Additional Increased Period of
Restoration
35
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Coinsurance / Blanket
36
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Margin Clause
37
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
CP 12 32
A. This endorsement applies to loss settlement on property that is subject to a Blanket Limit of Insurance.
A Blanket Limit of Insurance is a single Limit of Insurance that applies to any of the following as shown elsewhere in this policy:
1. Two or more buildings;
2. Building and contents;
3. Contents of more than one building; or
4. Contents at more than one premises.
38
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
CP 12 32B. Margin Clause
With respect to property that is subject to a Blanket Limit of Insurance, we will determine a maximum loss payable for each building and for the contents of each building or the contents at each premises. The maximum loss payable is determined by applying the applicable Margin Clause percentage indicated in the Schedule to the value of the property as shown in the latest statement of values reported to us. If the statement of values does not state individually the value of each building and the value of contents at each building or premises, we will determine individual values as a part of the total reported values prior to application of the Margin Clause percentage.
39
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Building Ordinance
40
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Building Ordinance
41
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
HowCauses of Loss
42
Falling Objects
Earthquake
Utility Interruption
Steam Explosion
Fire
Spoilage
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
How??
43
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
How
44
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Spoilage
45
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
A cheese manufacturer was insured by Aetna for several years
In 1998 Aetna was acquired by Travelers The insured suffered a contamination loss
in 2001
46
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
The 98-99 renewal used the Aetna form and the 99-2000 and 2001 renewal switched the coverage to Traveler’s form.
Traveler’s form contained an additional perils exclusion 2.d.7. • We will not pay for loss or damage caused by
or resulting from the following: for personal property… Evaporation, Loss of Weight, Contamination
Claim submitted under the Traveler’s form was denied and resulted in a $450,000 loss not paid
47
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
When
48
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
When
49
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Occurrence Forms
Coverage triggered due to injury / damage during policy
Liability is assigned to the policy in force at the time of a covered loss, though an event or condition that eventually produces the loss may have existed at an earlier time when a different policy was in force.
50
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
How Long?
51
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
When
52
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claims Made Forms
The trigger of coverage in this type of form is the date of the “claim”
The claim must be made during the policy period or any extended reporting period provided by the policy
53
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claims Made Forms
The policy will define what a “claim” is and will often include language regarding an “incident” and the rights and obligations of the insured to report an “incident” to reserve the policy for any ensuing claim
54
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claims Made and Reported Forms This is a more stringent version of the
Claims Made form Many professional liability forms are
written with these requirements TWO triggers
Claim made to “insured” Claim reported to carrier BOTH must happen – same policy
period to trigger coverage
55
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claims Made/Claims Made & Reported
A misconception of many agents is that there is automatically a short extended reporting period for 30 to 60 days built into the policy NOT true
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
D & O policy 1/1/08 to 1/1/09 On December 27th process server serves
summons and complaint The only person there is the receptionist On 12/29 Company VP comes in and
sees the summons, hands to receptionist saying send this to our broker
57
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
Broker comes into the office after holidays on 1/3 and finds the claim and immediately sends it to the insurance company
Claim denied Solution
Place with Claims Made coverage Basic Reporting Period – 60 days
58
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Next – Contract Concerns
Limits, deductibles/retentions Endorsements as requested Endorsements added by company Restrictions and limiting endorsements
and coverage language• Be aware and educated• Learn how to communicate these
issues to the insurance buyer
59
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com 60
File Management and Processing Issues
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Proposals
Critical document Describes coverage
Cover letter with binder should state binder replaces proposal
Use carrier quotes / proposals when possible
Audit your files for compliance with procedure manual master proposal
61
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Proposals
Default proposals in AMS often are non-specific and too expansive for actual insurance company being issued
Review of renewing insurance company proposals and comparison to prior year’s policy and endorsements Proper coverage Identified correctly
62
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
Middle aged woman is hired at her new position
Her benefits begin on the first day of the month following 30 days of employment
She completes the paperwork immediately and send it in
63
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
She sets up a physical at her new HMO a week after the effective date of her policy
She does not have a benefit card yet but HR says go ahead
She goes in, has the physical and they discover she has cancer
64
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example
The health insurance carrier never received the enrollment from HR they will accept subject to underwriting which means with cancer now as a pre-existing she has no coverage
65
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Claim Example What do you think the EBL will pay
• She is billed $450/visit as a private pay patient
• The HMO, if it had covered it, would have negotiated that bill down to $150.00 and no remaining would have been billed.
• Because she did NOT have the HMO the full $450.00 is due
Would EBL pay the $150.00 or $450.00?
66
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Fiduciary
Look at Fiduciary policy you are selling Two insuring agreements
• Wrongful Act, Error or Omission (EBL) $150.00
• Legal Liability $300.00
Employer is absolutely legally liable for the financial harm to that employee (ERISA)
67
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
ERISA
68
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Employee Dishonesty
Verify if using temporary employees or leased employees
If so, check definition and modify as needed
Policies vary and very important if changing carriers
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Proposals
Excess Liability vs. Umbrella Always verify the type of coverage form
being requested and received Do NOT use the phrase “following form”
excess unless it really is. Most excess policies written today are NOT following form
A true follow form is 2 pages long—no separate insuring agreement, etc
70
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Proposal Example
The proposal from the prior correctly showed that an umbrella had been issued.
At renewal, the account was re-marketed and the incoming carrier was unwilling to issue an umbrella and instead provided an excess liability policy
The proposal was re-created using the prior year’s template and this change was not noted to the insured and still reflected an “umbrella” was being provided.
71
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Applications
Most asked question—who is supposed to sign the application• Accord• Supplemental Application• Warranty Application
Second most asked question—who is supposed to complete the application (BI worksheet, Reports of Value)
72
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Applications
Lack of detail for coverage requests or endorsements
Lack of underwriting information Factual representation of client’s
exposures Property Omission of coverage requests
73
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Applications
Statement of values• Must get signature from authorized
representative• Request agreed value from insurer
BI Worksheet Liability
• Total Pollution Exclusion vs. Exclusion with exceptions
74
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Warranty Applications
Agency completing and signing or agency completing and client signing• Either method is incorrect
Client completing and signing is the proper approach• If the CLIENT completed last year’s
application in its entirety, provide a copy to the insured and ask them to complete the new application with correct information
75
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Applications
Comparison of coverage offers among quoting insurers
Show all admitted as well as non-admitted Retain information of insurance company
rejections• Reasons stated• Notate that information to the client in
writing
76
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Coverage Review Example
Application requested Business Income With Extra Expense
The proposal showed BI With EE to the client
Policy was checked Coverage was provided for BI Without EE No correction made
77
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Binders
Incorrect company name• I.e. Travelers when the issuing carrier is
Travelers Indemnity Co of Illinois• Always using Chubb as the company• Binders must be specific to the insurance
company that has agreed to provide the contract
78
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Binders
When placed with Surplus Lines broker• No authority placed with broker• Must have written authority provided by
Surplus Lines broker
79
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Policies
Coverage requests after policy issue• Document insureds request to the
carrier and confirm to the insured Review of coverage issues Identify insurance solutions Follow through with endorsement request
80
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Summary
Getting it right is difficult Identify risks / exposures Design insurance program Market – obtain company quotes Proposal accurate Corrections made Policy issued and corrected
Lot of work to be proud of
81
.www.InsuranceCommunityUniversity.com
Insurance Community Center.com New website
Provides tools and resources to help Easy to use Sign up today – for free!
82