Žižek, S. [2008]. 'The tyrant's bloody robe'. Violence. Six marginal reflections

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/18/2019 Žižek, S. [2008]. 'The tyrant's bloody robe'. Violence. Six marginal reflections

    1/6

    S lavoj Zizek

    V IOLENCE

  • 8/18/2019 Žižek, S. [2008]. 'The tyrant's bloody robe'. Violence. Six marginal reflections

    2/6

    Th

    e

    r

    e is an o

    l

    d

    s

    t

    o

    ry

    abo

    ut a worker

    sus

    pected of steal-

    ing : every e vening,

    a

    s

    h

    e l

    ea

    ves

    th

    e

    factory

      t

    h

    e whee l-

    barro

    w h

    e

    ro

    ll

    s in front of him is care

    full

    y inspected.

    The

    guard

    s can find no

    thi

    ng. is

    a

    lways empty. Fi-

    na

    ll

    y,

    th

    e

    p

    e

    nny drops : what th

    e

    worker is stea

    li

    ng are

    th

    e

    whe e lbarrows the

    ms e

    l

    ves

    ...

    there is a

    unif

    y

    in

    g t

    hesi

    s that ru

    n

    s th

    roug

    h the

    bric-

    a-br

    ac of

    re

    fl

    e ctio

    n

    s

    on v

    i

    o le nce that

    fo l low

      it is

    th

    a

    t a

    similar

    paradox ho ld

    s tru

    e for viole

    n

    ce. At the

    fo r

    e f r

    o

    nt of

    o

    ur

    m

    in

    d

    s

    ,

    t

    h

    e

    ob

    vious

    signa

    l

    s

    of

    v

    i

    o

    le

    n

    ce

    a

    r

    e

    acts of crime and terror,

    civ

    il unres t, in

    ternatio

    n

    a

    l

    conflict. But we

    shoul

    d

    le a

    rn

    t

    o

    ste

    p

    back,

    to di

    sentan

    -

    g

    l

    e

    ours e l

    ve

    s

    from

    th

    e

    fa scin

    a

    tin

    g lure of

    t

    hi

    s

    directly

    v

    isib l

    e

    "subjectiv

    e

    " vi

    o

    l

    e

    n

    ce, vi

    ol

    e

    n

    ce performed by a

    cle

    arl

    y

    identi

    fiab

    l

    e ag e

    n

    t. We need to pe

    r

    ce ive the

    c

    on-

    tour

    s of

    t

    h

    e

    bac

    kground

    w

    hi

    c

    h

    g e

    n

    erates

    s

    u

    c

    h

    o

    u

    tburs

    t

    s

    .

    A step b

    ac

    k

    enab

    les us to i

    denti

    fy a violence that sus-

    t

    a

    ins our v

    e

    ry

    e

    f fo

    rts to f ight violence and to promote

    to

    l

    e

    ran

    ce.

    Thi

    s

    is th

    e

    s

    tarting po

    int,

    per

    ha

    ps e

    v

    en

    th

    e ax

    i

    om

    , o

    f

    the pres ent book: subj

    e c

    tive vio

    l

    ence

    i

    s jus

    t th

    e mos t vis-

    i

    b

    l

    e

    p

    o

    r

    tion

    o

    f

    a

    t

    r

    iumvir

    a

    te

    that

    al

    s

    o

    includ

    es

    t

    wo

    ob

    -

    j

    ec

    ti

    ve

    kind

    s of

    v

    io lence. First  there

    is

    a "symbo

    li

    c"

    v

    io

    l

    e

    nce

    e

    mbodied in l

    a

    ngu

    a

    ge

    a

    nd its forms,what H

    e

    id

    e

    -

    gge

    r would call "our hous

    e

    of being . " A s we sh

    a

    ll s

    ee

    la t

    e

    r,

    this

    v

    i

    o l

    e

    n

    ce

    i

    s not

    o n l

    y at work in

    t

    he

    o bv io us

     

    n

    d

    ext

    e

    n

    -

    s i

    ve

    l

    y

    studi

    e

    d-ca

    ses of

    incitem

    ent

    an

    d of

    th

    e re l

    ation

    s

    of

    THE

    TYRANT S LOODY RO  E

  • 8/18/2019 Žižek, S. [2008]. 'The tyrant's bloody robe'. Violence. Six marginal reflections

    3/6

    around 4

    milli

    on people died in

    th

    e D e

    m

    o cr

    at

    ic Repub-

    li c of Congo as the result of

    po

    litical vi

    ole nc

    e

    o

    ve r

    th

    e

    la s t decade. None of the usua l human

    it

    a

    ri

    an uproar

    fo

    l-

    lowed, ju

    s

    t a couple

    o

    f re aders' le

    tt

    ers-a

    s

    if

    s

    o

    m

    e kind of

    filte rin

    g m

    e chanis

    m blocked

    t

    his new

    s fro

    m

    achievin

    g

    it

    s

    full

    im

    pact in our symbolic space   To put it cynica ll y,

    picked

    t

    he wrong victim in the s

    t

    rug g le for hege-

    mon

    y

    i

    n

    s

    ufferin

    g.

    s

    h

    ou

    l

    d

    ha

    ve

    s

    tu

    c

    k

    t

    o

    t

    h

    e

    li

    s

    t of

    us

    u

    a

    l

    sus

    p

    e c

    t

    s

    : Mu

    sli

    m

    wo

    men

    an

    d

    the

    ir pl

    ig h

    t

    ,

    or

    the

    families

    o

    f 9

    /n

    vi

    ctim

    s

    a

    nd how

    th

    ey

    ha

    v

    e cope

    d with

    t

    heir lo s s

    e s

    .

    Th

    e Congo

    t

    oday has ef fectiv

    e l

    y re

    -

    emerged

    as a Conradean

    "hear

    t o

    f

    d

    arkne

    s s. " No

    o

    ne dares to

    confro n

    t it he

    a

    d

    o

    n. The death

    o

    f a West B ank Pal

    e st

    in-

    ian

    c

    hil

    d ,

    not

    t

    o men

    t

    io n an

    I

    sr

    ae

    l i or

    a

    n

    Amer

    i

    can,

    is

    me

    d

    iatica lly worth

    thou

    sand

    s

    of

    t

    ime s m

    o

    re

    th

    an t

    h

    e

    d

    e a

    th of a n

    ame

    l

    e

    ss Con

    gole se

    .

    Do we need

    furthe

    r

    proof

    that

    t

    he

    hu

    m

    anitaria

    n

    s

    e

    nse

    o

    f u

    r

    gency is m

    e

    d

    ia te

    d

    , indee

    d

    ove rd

    ete

    rm

    in

    ed,

    by clear pol

    it

    ica l con

    s

    i

    derat

    i

    o

    ns

    ? A nd what are these

    co

    n

    s id

    er

    a

    ti

    o

    n

    s

    ?

    T

    o

    a

    n

    swe

    r

    this

    ,

    we

    n

    eed

    t

    o

    ste

    p ba

    c

    k

    an

    d t

    ak

    e a

    lo

    ok

    fro

    m a

    differe

    nt po

    s iti

    on  

    W

    h

    e

    n

    t

    he

    U .S

    .

    media

    re

    proa

    c

    hed

    t

    he public in fo r

    eig

    n

    countrie

    s

    fo

    r

    not di

    sp

    l

    a

    yi

    n

    g

    enough

    sy

    mp

    at

    hy for the

    vi ctim

    s o

    f

    th

    e

    9/n

    attacks, one wa

    s

    temp

    t

    ed to an

    s we

    r

    t

    hem in the

    word

    s Ro b

    e spi

    e

    rr

    e addre s s e

    d to

    t

    h

    o s e w

    ho

    co

    mplained

    about

    th

    e

    i

    nnoce

    nt vi

    ctims of re vo lu

    t

    i

    on

    ar

    y

    terror:

    "S top

    shak

    ing

    th

    e tyrant's b

    l

    oody robe in my fa ce   or I

    will believe t

    h

    at y ou

    w

    i

    s

    h

    t

    o put Rome in c

    ha

    ins ."

    In

    stea

    d

    of co nfront

    ing

    v

    i

    o

    lence direct

    ly ,

    the

    pr

    es-

    e

    nt

    bo o

    k casts s ix s i

    de way

    s gl

    ance s

    .

    Th ere ar

    e

    re a

    s

    on

    s

    for

    looki

    ng at

    th

    e

    probl

    e

    m of

    v

    i

    o le

    n

    ce

    a

    w

    r

    t,

    My

    und

    e

    r

    -

    ly ing premise

    i

    s that there i

    s s

    o

    m ething

    i

    nh

    eren

    tly

    3

    HE

    TYR

    A

    NT S BLOODY RO E

    social

    d

    ominati

    o

    n re produced in our hab

    i

    tua

    l s

    p

    e e ch

    fo rm

    s

    : there is a more

    fund

    amen

    ta

    l form of

    v

    io l

    e

    n

    ce

    s

    till

    that p

    ert

    ain

    s

    to l

    angua

    ge as suc

    h,

    to

    it s

    imp

    o s

    ition

    of a

    ce

    rtain

    uni

    v

    e rs e

    of

    meaning

      S ec

    ond, there is wha

    t

    I ca

    ll

    "sys

    t

    emic" violence

    ,

    or

    th

    e o

    ft

    en

    cat

    ast

    roph

    ic co nse-

    quences o

    f

    the smoo

    th functionin

    g o

    f

    our e conomic and

    politica l sy s t ems .

    The

    catc

    h

    i

    s

    th

    a

    t

    sub j

    e

    cti

    ve and

    obj

    e c

    tive

    v

    io

    len

    ce

    cann

    o

    t

    b

    e

    p

    erce

    ived from

    th

    e

    sa

    me

    s ta n

    dp

    o int   sub je cti

    ve

    violence

    i

    s experi

    e

    nced as

    s

    u

    ch

    again

    s

    t

    t

    h

    e

    b

    ac

    kground

    of

    a non-vio len

    t

    zero le ve l. is

    s

    een as a per

    turb

    a

    t

    io n o

    f

    th

    e

    "

    n

    o

    rma l

    ,

    " peace ful s

    t

    a

    t

    e o

    f

    th

    in

    gs. Ho

    weve

    r

    ,

    ob je c-

    t

    ive v

    io

    l

    e

    nce

    is

    p

    reci se l

    y th

    e vio

    l

    en

    ce inh

    eren

    t to

    this

    "nor

    ma

    l" s ta

    t

    e of

    th

    i

    ng

    s. O

    bj

    ecti

    v

    e vio

    len

    ce is in

    vi

    s ible

    sin

    ce it su

    s

    tains

    th

    e

    ve r

    y zero-evel

    standar

    d ag ains

    t

    which we p

    erce i

    ve

    so

    meth

    i

    ng as

    s

    ubjecti

    ve l

    y

    vio l

    ent.

    S

    y

    stemic

    v

    io lence is thus some

    thin

    g like the not

    o

    rious

    "

    d

    ark m

    atte

    r" of

    ph

    y s

    i

    cs, the c

    o

    unte rpart to an all-oo-

    v

    i

    s

    ib

    l

    e sub

    j

    e ctive vio le nce   may be

    in

    vi

    sib l

    e, but it has

    t

    o

    b

    e

    tak

    e

    n

    int

    o

    acc

    ou

    nt if

    one

    i

    s to

    m

    a

    ke

    s

    e

    n

    s

    e

    o

    f w

    h

    a

    t

    o

    th

    erw

    i

    s

    e s e e

    m to be "irr

    ational

    " explos io

    n

    s

    of s

    ub

    j

    ec-

    tive v

    i

    olence .

    When the

    me

    dia bombard us with those

    "hum

    a

    ni

    -

    t

    a

    ri

    an cri

    se s "

    whi ch

    s e e

    m co

    nst

    a

    ntl

    y to pop up a ll over

    the world,

    one s

    h

    o

    uld

    a l

    way

    s b

    ear in

    min

    d

    t

    ha

    t a

    p

    artic-

    ular

    cri

    s

    i

    s only exp

    l

    odes

    in

    to

    m

    edia v

    i

    sibility as the

    r

    e s

    ult of a complex strugg le .

    Properl

    y huma

    nit

    arian

    co

    n

    s

    id erations as a rule play a

    le

    ss

    impor

    tan

    t

    role he

    r

    e

    tha

    n

    cultura

    l  

    id eo l

    ogi

    co-

    poli

    t

    i

    c

    al

    , a

    nd

    econom

    i

    c

    con-

    s

    ide rations. The cove r

    s

    tory o

    f

    magaz

    in

    e on s

    June 2006, fo r e xample

    ,

    was "The Deadliest W ar in the

    World." Thi

    s

    offe

    r

    ed de ta

    il

    ed doc

    um

    entation on how

    2

  • 8/18/2019 Žižek, S. [2008]. 'The tyrant's bloody robe'. Violence. Six marginal reflections

    4/6

    Th e key

    qu

    e s

    ti

    on

    , of cour

    se

    ,

    i

    s

    what kind of d

    escri

    p-

    t

    ion

    i

    s

    i

    nt

    end

    ed

    h

    ere? Sur

    el

    y

    i

    t

    is n

    ot

    a re a li

    s

    t

    ic d

    e

    s

    crip

    -

    tion of

    th

    e s ituat

    i

    o

    n

     

    bu

    t w

    h

    at W all ace

    S t

    e

    v

    ens ca

    ll

    ed

    "d

    e scriptio

    n

    w

    i thout

    p

    l

    ac e ,

    "

    w

    hich is

    wh

    at i

    s

    prop

    e

    r

    t

    o

    art.

    Th

    is

    is

    not

    a

    d

    e s c

    ription whi

    c

    h loca

    te

    s i

    ts conte

    nt in

    a hi

    s

    t

    orical

    s

    p

    ace and

    tim

    e   but a de

    s c

    rip tion which

    c

    re

    at

    es, as

    the

    b

    a

    ck

    grou

    n

    d of

    t

    h

    e phe

    nom

    e

    n

    a

    it

    de

    s

    c

    ri

    be

    s

     

    an

    in

    ex is

    t

    e

    n

    t (v irtua

    l)

    space of its o w

    n

      so

    th

    at what

    ce eds .

    Th

    at i

    s t

    o

    s

    ay

    , w

    hen

    A do

    rno de clares

    po

    e

    t

    ry

    impossib l

    e (or,

    r

    ather, barbaric)

    af te

    r Ausc

    h

    w

    it

    z  

    thi

    s

    impos s ib ility is an e

    n

    a

    blin

    g impossibi

    l

    ity:

    p

    o e try is al-

    way

    s ,

    by

    def inition, "abou

    t"

    some thin

    g

    tha

    t

    ca

    nnot be

    addre s sed

    di

    rect

    ly

    , o

    nl

    y alluded to  

    On

    e s

    h

    oul

    d

    n't be

    afra

    id to take

    t

    hi

    s a

    s

    tep fu

    rth

    e r and refer

    t

    o the old say-

    i

    ng t

    h

    at m

    u

    sic

    c

    ome

    s in

    w

    he

    n

    w or

    ds fail.

    Th

    er

    e

    m

    ay

    we

    ll

    b

    e

    s

    ome

    t

    rut

    h

    in

    t

    h

    e co

    mm

    on w

    i

    s

    d

    o

    m

    th

    a

    t,

    i

    n a

    k

    in

    d

    ofhis

    t

    orica l premoni

    tion

    , t

    he

    mus ic

    of

    S c

    hoe

    n

    berg

    articula

    t

    ed the a

    nx

    ie ties and ni

    gh

    tmares of A

    u

    sc

    h

    witz

    be fo

    r

    e th

    e e ve

    n

    t took pl

    ace

    .

    In

    h

    er memoirs,

    Anna Akh

    m

    a

    t

    o va de s

    cri

    be

    s

    what

    happened

    t

    o her when, at the he

    i

    ght of the S ta

    lini

    s

    t

    purge

    s , s

    h

    e

    was waiting in the

    l

    o

    ng q

    u

    eue

    in front o

    f the

    Len

    in

    grad prison to

    l

    earn about

    h

    er arrested son Lev:

    One day s

    o me b

    ody in

    t

    he c

    ro w

    d i

    de nt

    i fied me .

    S t

    andin

    g

    be

    h

    ind me wa

    s

    a

    y o u

    ng woman , with lip s blu e fr om

    th

    e

    cold  

    w

    h

    o ha

    d ofc

    ou

    r

    se

    never

    h

    eard m e ca lled by name

    b

    e

    fore

    .

    No

    w

    s

    h

    e

    s

    t

    arte

    d out of

    th

    e

    torpor

    co mm

    o

    n

    t

    o

    u

    s

    a ll and

    as

    ked me in a whi s per

    (everyo

    ne whi spe red

    the

    r

    e

    )

      "C a

    n

    you descr ibe thi

    s?"

    And

    I s a

    id,

    "I

    can

    .

    Th e

    n

    s

    o me thing

    lik

    e a

    s

    m

    il

    e pa s

    s

    ed f l ee ti ng

    l

    y over what

    h

    a

    d

    once bee

    n

    he

    r fa c

    e

    .

    4

    5

    H

    E TYR

    AN

    T S BLOO

    D

    Y RO  E

    m

    y s

    tify

    in

    g in

    a direc

    t con

    fron

    t

    a

    tion with

    it

    :

    the o

    ver-

    p

    ow

    e

    ring

    horror

    of v

    i

    o

    le

    nt

    acts an

    d empa

    t

    hy wi

    t

    h the

    vi

    ctim

    s

    ine

    x

    orab

    l

    y function a

    s

    a lure w

    h

    ich prevents

    us

    fr

    om

    thi

    nki

    ng.

    A co

    nceptua

    l d

    eve

    l

    o

    p

    -

    ment of the

    t

    ypo logy

    of

    v

    i

    o lence mus t

    b

    y de f in

    iti

    on

    i

    gnor

    e its tr

    aumat

    ic imp

    act

     

    Y et

    there i

    s

    a

    sen

    se

    in

    w

    hich a cold

    ana

    l

    y s

    i

    s of

    v

    i

    o

    len

    ce

    some

    how

    reprodu

    ces

    an

    d

    p

    a

    rt

    icipate

    s

    in

    it

    s

    h

    orror

     

    A

    di

    s

    ti

    n

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n needs

    t

    o

    be

    ma

    de, as

    we ll ,

    between ( fa

    ct

    u

    a

    l

    ) t

    ruth

    a

    nd

    truthfu

    l-

    ness

      w

    h

    at re nders a report of a raped woman (o r any

    oth

    er nar

    r

    a

    tive

    of

    a

    traum

    a) trut

    h

    ful

    i

    s

    it

    s

    ve r

    y

    f actual

    unr

    elia

    bilit

    it

    s

    c

    onfu

    s i

    on   i

    ts incons is tency

    .

    th

    e

    victim were able to

    report

    on her painful

    an

    d humili-

    ating expe

    ri

    ence in a cle ar manner, with all the data

    arranged in a

    consi

    s

    t

    ent or

    d

    er  

    thi

    s very

    qualit

    y

    wo

    uld

    m

    a

    ke u

    s s

    u

    sp

    i

    ci o

    u

    s

    of

    it s

    t

    ruth

    . The probl

    e

    m

    here

    is

    part

    of

    the so lution :

    th

    e

    very

    fa ctua

    l d

    e

    fici

    e nc

    ies of

    t

    he

    traum

    ati

    se

    d sub

    j

    ect's report on he r

    e x

    perience bear

    w

    itn

    ess to

    th

    e

    truth

    fu

    ln

    ess of h

    e

    r

    report

      s ince

    t

    hey

    s

    ig

    n

    a

    l

    th

    a

    t

    th

    e

    r

    e

    por

    t

    ed

    c

    onten

    t

    "

    co

    nt

    a

    min

    a

    t

    e

    d

    "

    t

    he

    m

    a

    nn

    e

    r

    of rep

    o

    rti

    ng it.

    Th e

    s

    a

    m

    e

    ho

    l

    ds

    ,

    of

    co urs e

     

    fo

    r

    the so -ca ll e

    d

    unreli

    ability of the ve

    rba

    l

    re

    p

    ort

    s

    of Ho

    -

    l

    ocau

    s

    t surv

    i

    vors : the witness able to offer a clear nar-

    rati

    ve o

    f

    hi

    s c

    amp ex

    per

    i

    en

    ce

    wo

    uld di

    s

    q

    ua

    li

    fy

    hims e lf

    by virtue of tha

    t

    cl

    ari

    ty .

    '

    The only appropria

    t

    e

    approac

    h

    to my s

    u

    bj

    e

    ct

    th

    u

    s se

    em

    s

    to

    be o

    n

    e

    w

    hic

    h

    permit

    s

    var

    i-

    ations on

    v

    i

    o

    lence

    k

    e

    p

    t a t a

    d

    ista

    n

    ce o

    u

    t of re s

    p

    ect to-

    w ards its victim

    s .

    Adamo's famous

    s a

    y ing, it

    s

    e ems   ne e ds correction:

    it is not

    poetr

    y that is impos s ib le

    af te

    r

    A u

    s

    ch w

    itz   but

    rathe

    r

    Re

    ali

    s

    ti

    c

    prose fails, wh

    ere

    th

    e po e tic e vo -

    ca tion of t

    h

    e

    u

    nbearable atmosphe re of a ca mp s

    ue

    -

  • 8/18/2019 Žižek, S. [2008]. 'The tyrant's bloody robe'. Violence. Six marginal reflections

    5/6

  • 8/18/2019 Žižek, S. [2008]. 'The tyrant's bloody robe'. Violence. Six marginal reflections

    6/6

    An o b

    s

    cene third way out of

    th

    e

    d

    ile

    mm

    a wo

    u

    ld

    h

    ave

    been to adv

    i

    se the

    y

    oung man to

    t

    e ll his mot

    h

    er that

    he will j

    o

    in

    t

    he Re

    s

    istanc

    e ,

    a

    n

    d to te ll his

    R

    e s i

    st

    ance

    friends that he will take care of his mother,

    w

    hile

    , i

    n re -

    a

    li

    ty,

    wi

    t

    h

    dr

    aw

    ing

    t

    o a

    s ecl

    uded

    p

    lace a

    n

    d s t

    udy

    ing . . .

    Th

    ere is more

    th

    an c

    h

    eap cynici

    s

    m in

    t

    his advice.

    bring s to mind a we ll-kno wn S ov

    ie

    t

    j

    oke about Lenin.

    Und

    e

    r

    s

    ociali

    s

    m,

    Le

    nin

    's

    a

    d

    v

    ice

    t

    o

    yo

    ung

    p

    e o

    pl

    e ,

    hi

    s

    answer to what

    t

    hey shou

    l

    d do

    ,

    was "Le

    arn

    ,

    l

    earn

    ,

    and

    learn.

    "

    This was e voked at all t

    im

    es and displayed on all

    sc

    h

    ool wall

    s

    . The joke goes:Marx, Eng e ls , a

    n

    d Lenin are

    asked whethe r

    th

    ey would prefer to have a

    w

    ife or a m

    i

    s-

    t

    re s s

    .

    As expec

    te

    Ma

    rx  r

    ath

    er cons er

    vative

    in private

    matter

    s,

    a

    n

    s

    we

    r

    s

    ,

    "

    A w

    ife

    "

    w

    h

    ile

    En

    g

    els,

    m

    or

    e

    of a

    o

    pt

    s for a m

    i

    stre s s . To everyone's surpr

    i

    se, L enin

    say s ,

    "I 'd like to have both

     

    "

    W

    hy

    ?

    I

    s the

    re

    a

    hidden

    s tr

    i

    pe o

    f

    decadent be

    hin

    d h

    is

    auste re r

    e

    vo

    l

    u

    -

    t

    io

    n

    ary image?

    N

    o-

    h

    e e

    xp

    l

    a

    in

    s: "

    So

    th

    at

    I

    can

    t

    ell my

    wif

    e

    t

    h

    a t I am g o

    in

    g to my

    mistres

    s,

    an

    d

    m

    y mis

    tr

    e ss

    that I have to be with my wife . . . " "

    A

    nd then,

    w

    ha t do

    y ou

    d

    o?

    "

    "I go

    t

    o a

    solit

    a

    ry

    place to learn  le a

    rn

    , and

    learn "

    Is t

    hi

    s

    not

    exa c

    tly wha t Lenin did a

    f t

    er

    th

    e ca tastro-

    ph

    e of 1

    9

    1 4?

    H

    e wi

    thd

    rew

    t

    o a lonely place in S w itzer-

    l

    a

    nd

    ,

    w

    her

    e

    h

    e

    "

    l

    earne

    d

    ,

    l

    e a

    rn

    ed

    ,

    a

    n

    d

    l

    e

    arn

    e

    d

    ,

    "

    re a

    di

    n

    g

    Hegel's logic . And

    t

    his is what we

    sho

    uld do to

    d

    ay when

    we find ourselves bom

    barde

    d w

    i

    th mediat

    ic

    images of

    v

    iolence . We need to "

    learn

    , learn, and le arn" what causes

    th

    is vio

    l

    ence.

    8