Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

  • Upload
    rancak

  • View
    225

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    1/14

    Treating CoalTreating Coal --Bed MethaneBed Methane

    Produced Water for Beneficial UseProduced Water for Beneficial Useby MFI Zeolite Membranesby MFI Zeolite Membranes

    Junhang Dong and Robert Lee

    Participants:Liangxiong Li, Hai Xiao, Colin Edwards, Benjamin Brooks,Nining Liu, Ashlee Ryan, Marlene Maxesse, Theo Hoseman

    Petroleum Recovery Research CenterDepartment of Petroleum & Chemical Engineering

    New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801

    Phone: (505) 835-5293; Fax: (505) 835-5293; Email: [email protected]

    DOE-PERF Water Program Review Meeting, Annapolis, MD, Nov. 2005.

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    2/14

    2

    1. OVERVIEW

    Grant: NETL/DOE (DE-FC26-04NT15548) DoE project manager: Jesse Garcia (Tulsa)

    Timeline

    Project start date: October 1, 2004 Project end date: September 30, 2007 Percent complete: ~32%

    Budget/Total Project Funding DOE: $855,204 Contractor: $285,068

    Project Goal Demonstrate a new technology of reverse osmosis through

    molecular sieve zeolite membranes for efficiently treating theCBM produced brines for beneficial use.

    Funding received in FY04: $354,075Funding for FY05: $365,283

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    3/14

    3

    2. SCOPE & APPROACH

    Fundamental study for development of chemicallystable zeolite membranes for reverse osmosis (RO)purification of coal-bed methane produced water forbeneficial use. Project includes three phases:

    Phase 1 (FY05): Understand the mass transport behaviors ofwater and ions in zeolite membrane and the effects ofoperation parameters on the RO performance. ( COMPLETE )

    Phase 2 (FY06): Optimize the RO operation conditions and

    effectively improve membrane. ( ON-GOING ) Phase 3 (FY07): Long-term laboratory RO test using a 0.1-m 2

    tubular membrane unit for technical evaluation.

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    4/14

    4

    2.1 TECHNICAL APPROACH & BENEFITS

    Residual

    Disposal reducedvolume

    +

    H2O

    Na +{H2O}n

    Desalination by size-exclusionof hydrated ions

    Organic-containing CBMproduced brine

    Clean Water

    SEPARATION

    (Beneficial uses)

    Molecular sieve zeolites: Crystal: excellent

    chemical, mechanical,and thermal stabilities.

    Sub-nanometer poressuitable for molecular/ionseparation.

    Benefits: Mitigate environmental

    liability and relievefinancial burden causedby produced water in oiland gas production.

    Ease water shortage inNM and southwest aridregions.

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    5/14

    5

    2.2 DESALINATION MECHANISM2.2 DESALINATION MECHANISM

    MFIMFI--type zeolite used in this project: pore size 0.55 nmtype zeolite used in this project: pore size 0.55 nm

    Free permeation of water: molecular

    size of water much smaller thanzeolitic pores;Rejection of ions: hydrated ion sizemuch larger than zeolitic pores.

    Effect of the nanoscale intercrystalline pores:

    decreases ion rejection rate, especially for highTDS brines.

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    6/14

    6

    3. CURRENT STATUS3.1 High quality zeolite membranes synthesized

    NaY (FAU) membranePore size 0.74 nm

    Hydrophilic

    Tubular and disc membranesTubes: Pall Corp.

    MFI membranePore size: 0.55nm

    Hydrophobic

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    7/14

    7

    3.2 EFFECTS OF OPERATINGTEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE

    Effect of applied pressureEffect of temperature

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    0 20 40 60 80

    T, oC

    F w , m

    o l / m

    2 - h

    50.0%

    60.0%

    70.0%

    80.0%

    90.0%

    100.0%

    110.0%

    r i

    Na+, Fw

    Li+, FwNa+ rejection

    Li+ rejection

    0.000

    10.000

    20.000

    30.000

    40.000

    50.000

    0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00

    Pressure, MPa

    W a t e r

    f l u x m o l

    / m 2 . h

    0.000

    0.010

    0.020

    0.030

    0.040

    I o n

    f l u x , m o l

    / m 2

    . hFlux (water)Flux (ion)

    ADVANTAGES: Increasing temperature and pressure significantlyenhances water flux while maintaining high ion rejection.

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    8/14

    8

    3.3 ION AND WATERTRANSPORT MODEL

    f i

    cii f iwici

    C iiiion

    C D

    C

    RT E

    K RT

    E D J J J ,,1,

    , / ',0,2,1, expexp =

    ===

    94

    95

    96

    97

    98

    99

    100

    0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

    Crystallographic radius, Angstrom

    r i

    , %

    Li+ Na+ K+ Rb + Cs +

    1.0E-11

    1.5E-11

    2.0E-11

    2.5E-11

    3.0E-11

    0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

    Crystallographic size of ion, Angstrom

    W a t e r

    d i f f u s

    i v i t y

    , m 2 / s

    1.0E-13

    3.0E-13

    5.0E-13

    7.0E-13

    9.0E-13

    I o n

    d i f f u s

    i v i t y , m

    2 / s

    Water

    Ion

    Li+ Na+ K+ Rb+ Cs+

    ][ == p f

    www

    p pK

    d dp

    K J

    High rejection for alkali metal ions; multivalent ions are easier to be separatedby size exclusion due to higher charge density (hence larger hydrated ions).

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    9/14

    9

    3.4 PRELIMINARY RESULTS ON

    MEMBRANE IMPROVEMENT(PHASE II)

    0.0%

    10.0%

    20.0%

    30.0%40.0%

    50.0%

    60.0%

    70.0%

    80.0%

    90.0%100.0%

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

    Debye length (nm)

    S a l u

    t e r e j e c

    t i o n

    ( % )

    Before

    After

    Difference

    0.37 0.09 0.04 0.010.0150.02

    Feed Concentration (M)

    RO performance: before andafter modification.

    Online healing: deposition of metalion oligomers in intercrystal pores.

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    10/14

    10

    3.5 COMPARISON WITH TRADITIONALRO MEMBRANES

    BASED ON RO RESULTS FOR CBM PRODUCED WATER FROM FARMINGTON, NM

    Properties Polymer Membrane Zeolite membrane

    Organic resistance Poor Excellent

    Organic rejection Incapable of Good (>90% BETX)

    Ion rejection Good (>95%) Good (>95%, 1%TDS)

    Applicable TDS level Low (10%TDS)

    Membrane regeneration NO YESLifetime Short (< 3 mon) Long (> 5yr ?)

    Chemical stability Unstable in low pH Stable: acidic to basic

    Operating pressure >800 Psi < 500 Psi

    Thermal stability Poor Excellent

    Water flux >5 kg/h.m 2 ~1.0 kg/h.m 2 ( r i>80%)

    Membrane cost Low High{

    A d v a n t a g e s

    I s s u e s

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    11/14

    11

    CONCLUSION/PLANS (Phase II)

    Zeolite membranes are capable ofpurifying oil and gas field brines.

    Enhance water flux and ion rejection:

    optimize operating conditions andimprove membrane: Temperature and pressureTemperature and pressure Thinner membranesThinner membranes Intercrystal pore repairing/minimizationIntercrystal pore repairing/minimization

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    12/14

    12

    TRANSFER OF KNOWLEDGE

    PUBLICATIONS in leading journals L. Li, J. Dong, T.M. Nenoff, Transport of Alkali Metal Ions in MFI Zeolite Membranesduring Reverse Osmosis. Environmental Science & Technology , submitted (2005).

    X. Gu, J. Dong, T. M. Nenoff , D. E. Ozokwelu, Separation of p -Xylene fromMulticomponent Vapor Mixtures Using Tubular MFI Zeolite Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, revised after peer reviewed (2005).

    J. Zhang, J. Dong, M. Luo, H. Xiao, S. Murad, R. A. Normann, Zeolite-Fiber IntegratedOptical Chemical Sensors for Detection of Dissolved Organics in Water. Langmuir , 21(2005), 8609.

    H. Xiao, J. Zhang, J. Dong. M. Luo, R. Lee, V. Romero, Synthesis of MFI zeolite films onoptical fibers for detection of chemical vapors, Optics Letters , 30, 11(2005), 1270.

    X. Gu, J. Zhang, J. Dong, T.M. Nenoff, A Platinum-Cobalt-Loaded NaY Zeolite Membranefor Nonoxidative Conversion of Methane to Higher Hydrocarbons and Hydrogen.Catalysis Letters , 102, 1-2 (2005), 9.

    X. Gu, J. Dong, T.M. Nenoff, Synthesis of defect-free FAU-type zeolite membranes andseparation for dry and moist CO 2 /N2 mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 44 (2005), 937.

    * L. Li, J. Dong, T.M. Nenoff, R. Lee, Desalination by Reverse Osmosis Using MFI ZeoliteMembranes. Journal of Membrane Science , 243(2004) 401.

    PRESENTATIONS in national conferences J. Dong, L. Li, H. Xiao, R. Lee, Treating Coal-Bed Methane Produced Water for

    Beneficial Use By Reverse Osmosis through Zeolite Membranes, Ground WaterProtection Council (GWPC) Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, September 24 28, 2005.

    * L. Li, A. Ryan, T.M. Nenoff, J. Dong, R. Lee, Purification of Coal-Bed Methane ProducedWater by Zeolite Membranes. SPE Annual Meeting (Paper # 89892) , Houston, TX, Sept.

    27 29, 2004.

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    13/14

    13

    RELATIONSHIPS

    TO OTHER DOE PROJECTS Membrane/thin film synthesis technology developed

    in this project has been used in the following DOEfunded projects:

    Zeolite membranes for WGS membrane reactors for hydrogen

    production (EERE/DOE) Catalytic membranes for conversion of biomass-derived stocks

    to hydrogen (HNEI/DOE & EERE through Sandia) Zeolite-integrated chemical sensors for clean energy technology

    and environmental monitoring (NETL/DOE & WERC) Zeolite membranes for xylene separation (OIT/DOE) Zeolite membranes for CO 2 separation (NETL/DOE)

  • 8/4/2019 Zeolite Membrane for Reverse Osmosis

    14/14

    14

    THANK YOUTHANK YOU

    SS OCORROOCORRO NMNM -- WWILDLIFEILDLIFE RR EFUGEEFUGE