Upload
maishanu-malami
View
101
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“People and their managers are working so hard to be sure things are done right, that they hardly have time to decide if they are doing the right things.”
Stephen R. Covey
3
Outline
Why Performance measurement? Performance measurement in local
governments Best Practice Performance indicators Balanced Scorecard Logic Model Performance Budgeting Critical elements and some pitfalls
4
Why Performance Measurement?
In the spirit of good leadership and governance, there is the need to develop appropriate measures to assess performance
Government units of all sizes and types use performance measures as a tool for improving service delivery.
Performance measures offer many advantages to organisations
5
Why Performance Measurement?
Provide more effective management of your programmes Enhance decision making Identify and document areas that need
attention Strengthen managers’ focus on results Facilitate continuous improvement
Motivate staff and volunteersSupport annual and long-range
planning
6
Why Performance Measurement?
Explain your programme: get the story out to the public, to legislators, to elected officials
Document and publicize accomplishments
Build support for your programme Provide accountability: what the
public is (or will be) getting for the funds provided
7
Uses of Performance Measures in Local Government
1. To demonstrate accountability to citizens, elected officials and other interested parties by reporting the service efforts and accomplishments.
2. To improve the allocation of resources by using performance information to inform the development and enactment of a local government’s budget.
3. Assure the achievement of desired results by using performance information to monitor the delivery of services and make adjustments, if necessary, in the service delivery.
8
Things you Must be Aware of:
In any performance measurement system you will need to:
1. Know your output measures (that is, measures of the quantity of services provided) to monitor the delivery of services.
2. Know your outcome measures (that is, measures of the results associated with the provision of services) Please be aware of the difficulties of
measuring outcomes in the public sector
9
Things you Must be Aware of:
3. Use consistent measures from period to period in order to sustain attention to the process,
4. Ensure that there is periodic review and revision of the performance measures.
5. Ensure that comparisons are made with prior periods’ performance as well as with targets.
6. Comparison of performance data to the corresponding data from similar local governments.
10
Things you Must be Aware of:
7. Report performance results to the public and oversight bodies, as well as using the measures internally to initiate improvements.
8. Internally, ensure that the performance measures are used for the evaluation and recognition of departmental heads This can be an effective motivator, particularly if
incentives, such as staffing flexibilities, additional equipment and bonuses, can be partially based on meeting performance targets and goals.
9. Follow up on progress (or the lack thereof) of improvement plans.
11
Things you Must be Aware of:
10. To assure continuation of the use of performance measures for improving service delivery, the systems must be driven down into the organization such that the processes are in place, and the people want to continue using the processes.
11. Ensure that there is Chief Executive commitment and involvement in the overall process
12. Support staff involvement in the reviews of performance results.
12
Best Practice in Performance Measurement
Action Reasoning
Know what you are
trying to do
Strategy of state or national government, provides clear focus for all activities to ensure goal congruence and synthesis
Adopt a range of
measures
Both financial and non-financial to give a clearer indication of performance and areas for improvement
Extract comparative
measures
There must be a benchmark for performance to facilitate a competitive environment
Report results
regularly
Promotes knowledge and understanding whilst enabling effective resource allocation
Drive the system from
the top
Senior management commitment needed to enable the ethos to permeate the entire organisation
A Good Performance Measurement Framework
Simple, meaningful, uncomplicated and easily understood
Crafted, owned, managed by the staff and management of the local government
Predicated on high data integrity Must be able to drive and sustain improved
performance of staff and of services rendered by the local authority
Linked to critical goals, targets and drivers of the local authority
Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators
INPUTS: Resources used to produce an output or out-come, such as work, years or expenditures.
OUTPUTS/WORKLOAD: The amount of services provided, units produced, or work accomplished (output).
EFFICIENCY: Output per unit of input, input per unit of out-put, and similar measures of how well resources are being used to produce goods and services.
Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators
PROGRAM OUTCOMES: The direct results of a program on clients, users, or some other target group; the degree to which the program’s mission is achieved.
SERVICE QUALITY: The degree to which customers are satisfied with a program, the accuracy or timeliness with which the service is provided, and other measures that focus on the merit of the service delivery process itself.
Performance Measures Should Help Us Decide:
Are We Doing Things Right?(How?)
Are We Doing The Right Things?
(What?)
Input Process Output Outcome
Input: Resources, including budget and workforce Process: Activities, efforts, workflow Output: Products and services produced Outcome: Results, accomplishments, impacts
Build a performance team and communication networks
Only if the concept of performance measurement permeates through the whole organisation can it be successful. Involving employees, stakeholders and customers in planning the system is the first step to building their trust and commitment in the implementation phases.
Regular, open and accessible communication channels support the system throughout its lifecycle and ensure that deficiencies are communicated early.
Build Ownership and Commitment
Ownership and commitment relate closely to inclusion and communication. Because the key pressures of real measuring rest with the employees, it is vital that they believe in its benefits to themselves, to the organisation and to the customer.
Assign Accountability
Clear accountability represents a kind of system insurance, ensuring that measurement is properly conducted and results are properly reported.
It is unadvisable to leave all accountability to rest on top management; on the contrary, dividing it proportionally among management levels may help to prevent late revelation of possible system challenges.
Use performance data in service delivery decision-making
Integral use of performance information lies in making decisions about which services are underperforming and need more attention.
While a synthesis with other kinds of information is needed to establish ‘why’ a service is not performing, measurement data are the necessary foundation.
BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC)
The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a strategic performance management framework that allows organisations to manage and measure the delivery of their strategy.
In a recent world-wide study on management tool usage, the Balanced Scorecard was found to be the sixth most widely used management tool across the globe which also had one of the highest overall satisfaction ratings
24
BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC)
It translates an organization’s mission and strategy into a comprehensive set of performance measures that provides the framework for strategic measurement and management systems.
It attempts to balance the use of financial and non-financial measures in driving both short-term and long-run performance.
The BSC system is used to communicate and manage strategy implementation.
25
Customer Perspective:Creating a sustainable differentiated value
proposition is the heart of strategy
Product/Service Attributes Quality, Availability, Selection,
Functionality, Price
Relationship Service, Partnering
Image Brand
Internal Perspective
Operational Efficiency Supplier relationships, produce products &
services, distribute to customers, manage risk
Customer Relationships Provide desired services/products, provide
convenient processes, provide customized services
Innovation Process innovation, manage capital projects
Learning & Growth Perspectiveis all about Readiness
Competencies Total Quality Management process
improvement capabilities, developing a culture of assessment
Technology Software, local area network, wide-area
network, library information system, Web site, portal
Climate for Action Process improvement: Do it better, faster,
cheaper
Financial Perspective
Productivity Strategy Become a cost leader maximize use of existing assets
Revenue Growth Strategy Revenues from new customers Increase existing customer revenues Grants, fund raising
Cause-and-Effect Relationships
Vision achieved Satisfied
customers Efficient internal
processes Skilled employees Aligned resources
Mission/Vision
Customer Focus
Internal Processes
Org. Readiness
Financial
Who is Using the Scorecard?
CompaniesFederal governmentState and local government
Non-profit agenciesA few libraries
Starting Point Mission Statement (the present) Values Statement The Vision (the future) The gap between now and the
future leads to a plan of action to achieve the vision. How we get to the future involves strategies.
APPLICATION TO LGs
While the Balanced Scorecard was initially designed for commercial companies, the framework has found wide-spread use in the public and not-for-profit sector.
However, it is important to make a few changes to the strategy map template in order to make it suitable to government, public sector and not-for-profit organisations:
34
APPLICATION TO LGs
Strategy maps have to represent the strategy of the organisation.
Since the strategies of public and not-for-profit organisations differ widely, there are no right or wrong answers as to where the financial perspectives should go.
35
APPLICATION TO LGs
Move the Financial Perspective from top spot on the strategy map template. The overall objective of most public sector, government and not-for-profit organisations is not to make money, maximise profits or deliver shareholder return. While finance is important, it is usually not the overall reason why the organisation exists.
36
APPLICATION TO LGs
Instead, the main objective of public sector, government and not-for-profit organisations is to deliver services to their key stakeholders, which can be the public, central government bodies or certain communities.
This perspective usually sits at the top of the template to highlight the key stakeholder deliverables and outcomes.
37
APPLICATION TO LGs
The two remaining perspectives will largely stay as they are. Any public sector, government and not-for-profit organisations needs to build the necessary human, information and organisational capital to deliver its key processes to support its overall objectives of serving its stakeholders.
38
Sample Strategy Map
Customers
Internal Business Process
OrganizationalReadiness
Budget
DemonstrateAccountability Reduce
Costs
IncreaseNetworkCapacity
ImproveSkills
LowerCycle Time
ReduceProcessSteps
IncreaseSatisfaction
LowerWait Time
The Balanced Scorecard Framework Is Readily Adapted
to Non-Profit and Government Organizations
Public Value and Benefit
Individual & community-based outcomes
Customer Perspective
Service attributes & satisfaction
Financial Perspective
Accountability & value
Internal Processes
Efficiency & productivity
Learning & Growth
Staff skills, technology & climate for action
Critiques of the BSC
SC is labour intensive because it is a consensus-driven approach. The use of the BSC also requires
a change in the orientation of the employees (e.g. participation in decision making).
BSC may result in employees paying attention to the areas measured.
BSC may be too restrictive and also may not be able to cope with a fast changing environment.
42
The Logic ModelThe Logic Model
This is also known as Results Framework
“Begin with the end in mind”
Start by asking:▪ What results are we seeking?▪ What are we hoping to accomplish?▪ How will we accomplish it?
What is the Logic Model?What is the Logic Model?
A picture of a programA way to show the relationship
between what we put in (inputs), what we do (outputs) and what results occur (outcomes)
Sequence of if/then relationshipsCore of program planning and
evaluation
How the Logic Model can help the local government
Focuses on ultimate outcomes that the local government wants to achieve
It enables management to think backwards through the logic model to identify how best to achieve the desired results.
Thus, instead of focusing on what we are currently doing, we will shift focus to what we need to do to achieve our aim.
46
4 Es Framework of value for Money
Example of Logical Results Framework to assess value for money in healthcare delivery
BenchmarkingBenchmarking
“Formal benchmarking is the continuous, systematic process of measuring and assessing products, services and practices of recognized leaders in the field to determine the extent to which they might be adapted to achieve superior performance.”
Types of BenchmarkingTypes of Benchmarking
Internal – commonly one year compared to a previous year’s performance
External – your performance compared to another similar organizations
Operational – your recent annual or periodic performance
Strategic – long term performance
BenchmarksBenchmarks
Internal Benchmarks
- Overall spending - Growth in tax base - Growth in income - New home starts - Miles within service
area
External Benchmarks
- Private sector wages
- Neighboring cities - Similar sized counties - Statewide groupings - Statewide averages
Performance BudgetingPerformance Budgeting
Based on the assumption that presenting performance information alongside budget amounts will improve budget decision-making by focusing funding choices on program results
Performance BudgetingPerformance Budgeting
Performance based budgeting cannot begin until a system of performance measurement has been instituted
A functional performance based budgeting system cannot be expected to produce the long-term desired results in the first year of its inception
Must build a Performance Based Management System
Performance Budgeting
Performance budgeting relies on:
1. Strategic planning2. Operational planning3. Performance accountability4. A realistic performance
measurement system to build budgets.
Performance BudgetingPerformance budgets focus on “return on investment”—that is, what do we get for our investment of resources?
Basic service level (or continuation of basic services)?
Increased services (more services to same recipients or expansion of same services to more recipients)?
Better (higher quality) services?
More efficient services (cost savings in service delivery)?
Mitigation or resolution of a problem?
ExampleExample
Service Area Objective Input Output EfficiencyService Quality Outcome
Street Reconstruction 5% $1,374,500 4 4.7% 75% 7%
Capital Facilities
Maintain construction
cost growth to no more than 5
percent
Budget/actual costs
Staff
Number of Projects
completed
Engineering design costs as a percent
of total project cost
Percent of projects
completed on time
Contract cost
growth (%)
56
Integrating Performance into Budget Decision Making
Establish the link between resources and results early and maintain that link through budget development, appropriation, and budget control processes.
Set performance standards linked to appropriation levels Performance standards are the expected levels of performance
associated with a performance indicator for a particular period and funding level. They link dollars and results
Performance standards are one way to demonstrate RETURN ON INVESTMENT--what we can expect to receive for our money (easier to explain to stakeholders)
Use performance data to help make program decisions in budget development
The Failure of Strategy
"You can either take action or wait for a miracle to happen. Miracles are great but they are unpredictable."
Peter Drucker
58
Pitfalls
The performance measurement process should not be used for assigning blame or finding fault with others’ performance.
This is especially important since one person’s desire for accountability can be perceived by others, and particularly those on the front line of service delivery, as merely pointing fingers.
59
Pitfalls
Although the local government might conclude it obtained better service delivery or a process improvement from collecting and using performance data to trigger a change in the way the program operates, it needs to ascertain the explicit change in inputs, outputs, and/or outcomes to confirm that the improvement actually occurred.