1
Contreras, D ., Kienberger, S. and Zeil, P. Z_GIS Centre for Geoinformatics, Salzburg University ; Schillerstrasse 30, 5020 Salzburg [email protected] Spatial vulnerability indicators applied to recovery and disaster risk reduction after earthquakes: The case of L‘Aquila - Italy 4 2 3 1 Project Context Objective Case study area 5 Conceptual framework Vulnerability assessment is a key step to formulate recovery and development policies in the risk management process. More vulnerable zones have longer recovery phases” (Wisner et al., 2004). The post-disaster phases present an opportunity to address the pre- existent vulnerability conditions in order to reduce the risk, and create more resilient societies. This research is a part of MOVE, a project with multidicipinary approach to create knowledge, framework and methods to assess the vulnerability to natural hazards in Europe. The project also will take into account the outcomes from the “Recovery plan“ formulated in Bogotá D.C. (Colombia), which is a pre-impact recovery plan based on an intervention model. The case study area is L‟Aquila (Italy), which was shaken by the 6 th of April 2009 earthquake. The historical center was devastated, 1.500 people were injured (202 serious injured and 898 light injured), 308 lost their life, 44.000 became homeless and between 3.000 and 10.000 buildings were damaged. The cost of the damage is estimated to be about 16 billions of Euros. 5 4 Methodology The methodological approach relies on spatial variables to develop an index of geospatial indicators, which is not only based on physical patterns but also on the social, economical, institutional, cultural and environmental dimensions. The main objective of this research is to develop a methodology for monitoring and evaluating the recovery process after earthquakes, based on a framework of spatial vulnerability indicators other than the usual which mostly evaluate the physical aspect. This research is an attempt to find the correlation between vulnerability conditions and the dynamics of relief, recovery and development processes and to know which and how other factors influence the interventions during post-disaster phases. The OECD model identifies three groups of indicators: pressure, state and response indicators. State indicators are based on the vulnerability conditions, pressure indicators rely on the level of damage and response indicators show the effectiveness of the relief and recovery activities. From these results, it should be possible to know if the stage of development in the recovery process (window time about 5 years) is reached. The indicators extracted from the relief, early recovery and recovery variables, can be considered as monitoring indicators; however, the indicators extracted from the recovery variables are also useful to determine if the stage of development is reached. Therefore, these are also denominated as performance or evaluation indicators. Individually, the indicators will be based on spatial variables, and they will part of an index or composite indicator to measure the efectiveness of the relief, early recovery, and recovery activities to determine if the development stage has been reached. The added value with spatial indicators is that not only the physical dimension will be measured, but also the social, economical, institutional, cultural and environmental. Source: http://www.move-fp7.eu/ Source: Google Earth Perspective of L„Aquila city (Italy). Source: http://newsitemstoday.today.com/files/2009/04/laquila_italy_earthquake_2009.jpg Source: Google Earth L„Aquila province in Abruzos region (Italy). Source:http://www.luventicus.org/mapas/it alia/abruzos.html L„Aquila (Italy) location and fault line. Source: Googlemaps Destroyed houses in the village of Onna (Italy). Photographed by Max Rossi/REUTERS Shelter in a gymnasium in L„Aquila (Italy). Photographed by Mario Laporta Reconstruction activities in L„Aquila (Italy). Source: European pressphoto agency Conceptual framework. Research design. This research is sponsored by the European Community s Seventh Framework Programme - Grant agreement number 211590 - FP7-ENV-2007-1 (MOVE).

Z GIS Centre for Geoinformatics, Salzburg University ... - UCL · Z_GIS –Centre for Geoinformatics, Salzburg University ; Schillerstrasse 30, 5020 Salzburg [email protected]

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Z GIS Centre for Geoinformatics, Salzburg University ... - UCL · Z_GIS –Centre for Geoinformatics, Salzburg University ; Schillerstrasse 30, 5020 Salzburg dianamaria.contreras-mojica@sbg.ac.at

Contreras, D., Kienberger, S. and Zeil, P.Z_GIS – Centre for Geoinformatics, Salzburg University ;

Schillerstrasse 30, 5020 Salzburg [email protected]

Spatial vulnerability indicators applied to recovery and disaster risk reduction after earthquakes: The case of L‘Aquila - Italy

4

2

31Project Context

Objective

Case study area

5

Conceptual framework

Vulnerability assessment is a key step to formulate recovery anddevelopment policies in the risk management process. “Morevulnerable zones have longer recovery phases” (Wisner et al., 2004).The post-disaster phases present an opportunity to address the pre-existent vulnerability conditions in order to reduce the risk, and createmore resilient societies.

This research is a part of MOVE, a project with multidicipinaryapproach to create knowledge, framework and methods to assess thevulnerability to natural hazards in Europe. The project also will takeinto account the outcomes from the “Recovery plan“ formulated inBogotá D.C. (Colombia), which is a pre-impact recovery plan based onan intervention model.

The case study area is L‟Aquila (Italy), which was shaken by the 6th of April 2009earthquake. The historical center was devastated, 1.500 people were injured(202 serious injured and 898 light injured), 308 lost their life, 44.000 becamehomeless and between 3.000 and 10.000 buildings were damaged. The cost ofthe damage is estimated to be about 16 billions of Euros.

5

4MethodologyThe methodological approach relies on spatial variables todevelop an index of geospatial indicators, which is not onlybased on physical patterns but also on the social,economical, institutional, cultural and environmentaldimensions.

The main objective of this research is to develop a methodology for monitoring andevaluating the recovery process after earthquakes, based on a framework of spatialvulnerability indicators other than the usual which mostly evaluate the physical aspect.This research is an attempt to find the correlation between vulnerability conditions andthe dynamics of relief, recovery and development processes and to know which andhow other factors influence the interventions during post-disaster phases.

The OECD model identifies three groups of indicators:pressure, state and response indicators. State indicatorsare based on the vulnerability conditions, pressureindicators rely on the level of damage and responseindicators show the effectiveness of the relief andrecovery activities. From these results, it should bepossible to know if the stage of development in therecovery process (window time about 5 years) isreached.

The indicators extracted from the relief, early recovery andrecovery variables, can be considered as monitoringindicators; however, the indicators extracted from therecovery variables are also useful to determine if thestage of development is reached. Therefore, these are alsodenominated as performance or evaluation indicators.

Individually, the indicators will be based on spatialvariables, and they will part of an index or compositeindicator to measure the efectiveness of the relief, earlyrecovery, and recovery activities to determine if thedevelopment stage has been reached. The added valuewith spatial indicators is that not only the physicaldimension will be measured, but also the social,economical, institutional, cultural and environmental.

Source: http://www.move-fp7.eu/

Source: Google Earth Perspective of L„Aquila city (Italy).Source: http://newsitemstoday.today.com/files/2009/04/laquila_italy_earthquake_2009.jpg

Source: Google Earth

L„Aquila province in Abruzos region (Italy).Source:http://www.luventicus.org/mapas/italia/abruzos.html

L„Aquila (Italy) location and fault line.Source: Googlemaps

Destroyed houses in the village of Onna (Italy).Photographed by Max Rossi/REUTERS

Shelter in a gymnasium in L„Aquila (Italy).Photographed by Mario Laporta

Reconstruction activities in L„Aquila (Italy).Source: European pressphoto agency

Conceptual framework.

Research design.

This research is sponsored by the European Community s Seventh Framework Programme - Grant agreement number 211590 - FP7-ENV-2007-1 (MOVE).