24
Youth Wellbeing Study – Update Marc Wilson, Jessica Garisch, Robyn Langlands, Angelique O’Connell, Lynne Russell, Emma-Jayne Brown, Tahlia Kingi, Kealagh Robinson, and Maddie Judge Wellington, May 2014

Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

  • Upload
    palila

  • View
    51

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Youth Wellbeing Study – Update . Marc Wilson, Jessica Garisch, Robyn Langlands, Angelique O’Connell, Lynne Russell, Emma-Jayne Brown, Tahlia Kingi , Kealagh Robinson, and Maddie Judge Wellington, May 2014. Youth Wellbeing Study. Longitudinal survey with secondary school students. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Marc Wilson, Jessica Garisch, Robyn Langlands, Angelique O’Connell, Lynne Russell, Emma-Jayne Brown, Tahlia Kingi, Kealagh Robinson, and Maddie Judge

Wellington, May 2014

Page 2: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Youth Wellbeing Study

• Longitudinal survey with secondary school students.• Non-Suicidal Self-injury• Primarily investigating

– Risk and protective factors for the development of non-suicidal self-injury

– Barriers to help-seeking

Page 3: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Trajectory of NSSI among young New Zealanders

• We have data spanning age-groups– 13 – 15 years olds

...and you’ve heard us talk about before:– 16 – 19 year olds– University students (M=19 yo)

Page 4: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Prevalence

• YWS Wave 1 results– N=1027 (991 responded to questions on NSSI)

• 213 (21%) engaged in NSSI at least once– 81.6% had engaged in NSSI in the past year

• Senior secondary school students– N=1162

• 48.7% had engaged in NSSI at least once– 53.6% had engaged in NSSI in past year

» 46.4% over a year ago

• University students– N= 593

• 43.7% had engaged in NSSI at least once

Page 5: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Pre-survey Post-survey1

2

3

4

5

Participants indicated how they felt at the start, and again at the end, of the survey.

If anything, participants report feeling on average happier at the end.

Page 6: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

YWS wave 1: Further information on prevalence...Type of NSSI Never

thought about

Thought about, never done

Have done once

Have done a few times

Have done many times

Cut 80.2 6.0 3.8 6.2 3.8

Scratched 87.5 2.7 3.8 4.0 1.9

Carved 89.2 2.3 3.7 3.0 1.7

Punched/ banged

90.3 2.5 3.7 2.7 0.7

Stuck sharp objects

91.1 2.1 3.4 2.4 0.9

Prevent healing 91.8 1.5 3.3 1.9 1.4

Bitten self 93.8 2.4 2.4 1.0 0.4

Burn 94.3 2.7 1.5 1.0 0.5

Rubbed glass 96.0 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.3

Broken bones 97.1 1.6 0.7 0.4 0.2

Rubbed sandpaper

97.7 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.1

Dripped acid 99.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0

Used bleach/ cleaning agent

99.2 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0

Page 7: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Prevalence of Types of NSSI

• YWS Wave 1 sample– Cutting most common– Severe scratching, carving the skin, punching or banging

• Senior Secondary School students– Sticking sharp objects into the skin, carved, scratch most common– Cutting

Other types assessed (e.g. using acid, sandpaper, etc.) much less frequently reported.

Types of NSSI generally cluster into 2 factors: ‘common’ + ‘uncommon’

Page 8: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Engagement in multiple types of NSSI

University student data suggests that the majority of young people engage in 1 – 3 types of NSSI...

Page 9: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Engagement in multiple types of NSSI

• YWS Wave 1• Of the 213 who reported NSSI

– 25.6% reported 1 form– 17.4% reported 2 forms– 15.5% reported 3 forms

– 37.1% reported > 3 forms

Page 10: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Self-reported Function of NSSI

Page 11: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

YWS Wave 1: Four Clusters(Functions assessed using FASM (Klonsky & Olino, 2008)

Interpersonal:Other-focused

Interpersonal: self-focused

Intrapersonal: Disconnection

Intrapersonal: Affect & Punish

Page 12: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Functions & Psycho-social functioning

• Generally, intrapersonal functions (both disconnection and affect regulation/self-punishment) most strongly associated with indicators of poor functioning...

Page 13: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Anxiety

Leve

l of F

uncti

on e

ndor

sem

ent

DepressionLe

vel o

f Fun

ction

end

orse

men

t

Page 14: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Attachment to Parents

Leve

l of F

uncti

on e

ndor

sem

ent

Attachment to PeersLe

vel o

f Fun

ction

end

orse

men

t

Page 15: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Emotion Regulation

Leve

l of F

uncti

on e

ndor

sem

ent

ResilienceLe

vel o

f Fun

ction

end

orse

men

t

Page 16: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Suicidal Ideation

Leve

l of F

uncti

on e

ndor

sem

ent

Self-EsteemLe

vel o

f Fun

ction

end

orse

men

t

Page 17: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

YWS: Participant Clusters by Function• Cluster 1: Affect regulation &

self-punishment (n=75)

• Cluster 2: Low on all (n=81)

• Cluster 3: Highest on intrapersonal (n=13)

• Cluster 4: High on all, highest on both interpersonal (n=22)

Inter/Other

Inter/self

Intra/d

iscon

Intra/aff

ect&punish

0

1

2

C1

C4

C2

C3

Page 18: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

YWS: Clusters + Psycho-social functioning

• Four clusters differed significantly on:– Suicidality (notably C1 and C3)– Self-esteem– Resilience– Depression– Anxiety– Emotion regulation– Attachment to parents (but not peers...)– NSSI behaviour

Cluster 2 (low on all) generally the best

Page 19: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

The NUMBER of types of self-injury engaged in is strongly predictive of suicidal ideation:

For each additional form, SBQ scores increase:1 form SBQ = 3.5ish2 forms SBQ = 5ish3 forms SBQ = 7ish

7 is the recommended cutoff for concern…

Page 20: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Inter/Other

Inter/self

Intra/d

iscon

Intra/aff

ect&punish

0

1

2

C1 C2 C3 C40

1

2

3

4

5

6

Num

ber o

f orm

s of N

SSI e

ngag

ed in

YWS: Participant Clusters by NSSI forms

C1

C4

C2

C3

Page 21: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Inter/Other

Inter/self

Intra/d

iscon

Intra/aff

ect&punish

0

1

2

YWS: Participant Clusters by NSSI forms

C1 – 2nd most likely to cut, 3rd most likely for most forms

C4 – most likely to self-bite, 2nd most likely for most.Most likely to have thought about ‘atypical’ self-injury like bone breaking, using glass, bleach, etc

C2

C3 – Most likely to cut, carve, insert

Page 22: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Implications for practice

• Results congruent with the idea that NSSI begins in early adolescents, and continues into early adulthood for some individuals

• Forms of NSSI: multiple behaviours need to be queried.

• Functions– Heterogeneity– Affect regulation most prevalent

Page 23: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Implications for practice continued...

• Functions can point to skills required...– Affect regulation

• Distress tolerance skills• Labelling and communicating emotions• Understanding beliefs regarding experiencing (and showing)

emotion

Page 24: Youth Wellbeing Study – Update

Acknowledgements

• Participating schools, counsellors + students• HRC

Thanks for listening

Any questions? Comments?