1
Figure 79. Fallugia paradoxa. A, Potential suitable habitat for species based on average annual and monthly precipitation and temperature from 1971 to 2000, continuous model output with no threshold. B, Potential suitable habitat, binary output using .5 threshold. C-E, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year 2050 under emission scenario (C), B1, (D), A1B, (E), A2. F-H, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year 2100 under emission scenario (F), B1, (G), A1B, (H), A2. I-K, Number of 2050 emission scenario models predicting each suitability class, (I), increased suitability, (J), maintained suitability, (K), decreased suitabil- ity. L-N, Number of 2100 emission scenario models predicting each suitability class, (L), increased suitabil- ity, (M), maintained suitability, and (N), decreased suitability. EXPLANATION Potential Suitable Habitat, Current No threshold High : 0.797972 Low : 9.70534e-006 Potential Suitable Habitat, Current No threshold High : 0.958803 Low : 5.49171e-007 Year Emission Scenario -- B1 A1B A2 Year Suitability Class -- Increased Maintained Decreased 2100 2050 2100 2050 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 300 600 Miles EXPLANATION Model Agreement 0 models 1 model 2 models 3 models EXPLANATION Potential Future Suitable Habitat Unsuitable Decreased Increased Maintained EXPLANATION Potential Suitable Habitat, Current Threshold: 50% Unsuitable Suitable EXPLANATION

Year Emission Scenario -- B1 A1B A2 · 2012-02-09 · Fallugia paradoxa. A, Potential suitable habitat for species based on average annual and monthly precipitation and temperature

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Year Emission Scenario -- B1 A1B A2 · 2012-02-09 · Fallugia paradoxa. A, Potential suitable habitat for species based on average annual and monthly precipitation and temperature

Figure 79. Fallugia paradoxa. A, Potential suitable habitat for species based on average annual and

monthly precipitation and temperature from 1971 to 2000, continuous model output with no threshold. B,

Potential suitable habitat, binary output using .5 threshold. C-E, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year

2050 under emission scenario (C), B1, (D), A1B, (E), A2. F-H, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year

2100 under emission scenario (F), B1, (G), A1B, (H), A2. I-K, Number of 2050 emission scenario models

predicting each suitability class, (I), increased suitability, (J), maintained suitability, (K), decreased suitabil-

ity. L-N, Number of 2100 emission scenario models predicting each suitability class, (L), increased suitabil-

ity, (M), maintained suitability, and (N), decreased suitability.

EXPLANATION

Potential Suitable Habitat, Current

No threshold

High : 0.797972

Low : 9.70534e-006

Potential Suitable Habitat, Current

No threshold

High : 0.958803

Low : 5.49171e-007

Year Emission Scenario -- B1 A1B A2

Year Suitability Class -- Increased Maintained Decreased

2100

2050

2100

2050

A B

C D E

F G H

I J K

L M N

0 300 600

Miles

EXPLANATION

Model Agreement

0 models

1 model

2 models

3 models

EXPLANATION

Potential Future Suitable Habitat

Unsuitable

Decreased

Increased

Maintained

EXPLANATION

Potential Suitable Habitat, Current

Threshold: 50%

Unsuitable

Suitable

EXPLANATION