.

. ,

8 Southeast Michigan Councilof Governmentsh h Boo Boon Buicing Deot Mengan

~

48226 (313)961-4266 [" ' %y h' %c ,,

~ ,..

July 17, 1981 f' 4" gjfe ?

s%^ f #6a~

B. J. Youngblood, Chief ,

f -

# dLicensing Branch No. I +U. S. Nuclear Regulatory ComissionWashington, DC 20555 'El1 d- '

,

RE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement from the U. S. NuclearRegulatory Comission for project entitled " Operation of EnricoFermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2."Areawide Clearinghouse Code: LU 810205

Dear Mr. Youngblood:

The Council of Covernments has processed a rev'ew for the cbove DraftEnvironmental Impact Statement according to the guidelines establishedin federal Off'.ce of Management and Budget Circular No. A-95.

The following agencies were asked to comment on your project:

(See attached list.)

As of this date the Wayne County Plannino Comission, the Wayne CountyIntermediate School District, the Oakleno County Division of Planning,the Monroe County Planning Department and Commission, Frenchtown Township,Jefferson Schools, the Macomb County Planning Comission, the WashtenawCounty Metropolitan Planning Commission, SEMTA, and the Detroit AreaAgency on Aging 1-A have submitted written comments which are attached.

The other public agencies notified have not responded to our solicitationfor comments during the A-95 review period. We will forward late commentsto you, for your information and attention.

The Wayne County Planning Commission's response had an attached letterfrom the Wayne County Department of Health, Air Pollution Control Divisionwhich stated that the Michigan-Ontario Transboundary Air Pollution Committeeof the International Joint Commission should be informed of this Draft EIS.SEMCOG has nuc notified Canadian authorities but the 10 Mile Plume ExposurePathway and 50 Mile Ingestion Exposure Pathway directly impact the Provinceof Ontario, Canada. We assume that the NRC has initiated comments fromCanadian authorities,since international relations falls outside the scopeof A-95 review.

olCo$

f Ii9107210297 91 717POR ACCCK 05 00341D PDR

DANIEL T Mapewy 0%rpe* sonCounty Esecunve comona Cun*y

a 0, - ,the or et

AME5 L PEO Vce 0$ceroe' son wwAM E SMilfY Vce C'oroersonk,ce' visor *Ne me a.esmo Cornmasoner $t C.ov CAnvyMChAEL M GwSAC.lsecubveDirector

r

.

.

B. J. Youngblood, ChiefJuly 17, 1981Page Two

10 Mile Plume Exposure Pathwayh!chigan Department of Civil Rights-Eastern DivisionMonroe Coenty Intermediate School DistrictMonroe County Cooperative Extension ServiceMonroe County Planning CommissionBerlin TownshipVillage of Estral BeachVillage of South RockwoodVillage of CarletonCity of MonroeFrenchtown TownshipMonroe TownshipLaSalle TownshipExeter TcwnshipAsh TownshipRaisinville TownshipJefferson School DistrictWayne County Intermediate School District

. _ _

-

Wayne County Planning CommissionWayne County Cooperation Extension ServiceHuron TownshipCity of Flat RockCity of RockwoodBrownstown TownshipCity of GibraltarCity of WoodhavenCity of TrentonGrosse Ile Township

50 Mile Ingestion Exposure PathwayMichigan Department of Civil R1ghts-Western DivisionWashtenaw County Metropolitan Planning CommissionLivingston County Department of Internal ServicesOakland County Division of PlanningMacomb County Planning CommissionCity of Detroit Planning DepartmentRegion II Planning CommissionClinton River Watershed' CouncilRouge River Watershed CouncilSt. Clair County Metropolitan Planning CommissionSoutheastern Michigan Transportation Authority (SEMTA)Areawide Water Quality BoardToledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments (TMACDG)Huron-Clinton Metropolitan AuthorityDownriver Community ConferenceHuron River Watershed CouncilComprehensive Health Planning Council of Southeastern Michigan (CHPC-SEM)Southeastern Michigan Council on Emergency *tedical ServicesArea Agency on Aging 1-AArea Agency on Aging 1-BArea Agency on Aging 1-C

.

. .

B. J. Younblood, ChiefJuly 17, 1981Page Three

The Wayne County Intermediate School District has recommended that theFinal Environmental Impact Statement include an emergency response planin case of a nuclear emergency at Enrico Fermi. Reference to theMichigan-Detroit Edison-Monroe County Radiological Emergency ResponsePlan may satisfy this concern. SEMCOG is not aware at this time whetheror not this Emergency Response Plan is completed, nor are we aware ofthe extent of the intergovernmental communications network involved.This Plan should be completed before the Fermi plant begins operation.All major governmental units within the 10 and 50 mile exposure areasshould be familiar with this Plan. The Oakland County Divtsion of Planningand the Oakland County Emergency Medical Service / Disaster Control Divisionhave also forwarded comments concerning communications with Enrico FermiPower Plant officials concerning an emergency response to accidents or sabotage.

The Monroe County Planning Department and Commission asked for an extensionin the review period for the Draft EIS. The NRC graciously extenced thetime period to allow the Planning Commission an opportunity to furtherinvestigate the impacts of the operation of Enrico Fermi on Monroe County.The Planning Commission invited representatives from Detroit Edison toa meeting and the resulting comments are contained in the attached letter.They do not directly object to the operation of this facility, but wouldlike their concerns addressed.

The Council's staff and AWQB staff have reviewed the Draft EnvironmentalImpact Statement document for consistency with areawide plans andprograms. Although the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments iscurrently developing a comprehensive regional energy management plan,this document has not yet been presented for adoption by the Council'spolicy body. The Fa mi II Draft Environmental Impact S:atement has,however, been reviewed for consistency with SEM 0G's ad)pted policies con-cerning environmental protection and land use. Th;re are no apparentconflicts between the Draft EIS and these plans and po*1cies. We lockforward to the Final EIS for the Enrico Fermi facility.

Sincerely,. \ .

'

i d . [iG \M;

.NE(dward J. Hustoles; AICP, PCP

m. ,,_.; ..-> - -

Director, Planning Division

EJH/RWP/1hAttachments

cc: Please see attached list.

.

.

3. J. Youngblood, ChiefJuly 17, 1981Page Four

cc: Berlin TownshipVillage of South RockwoodFrenchtown TownshipJefferson School DistrictWayne County Intermediate School DistrictHuron TownshipCity of Flat RockCity of RockwoodBrownstown TowrshipCity of Gibra', tarCity of WoodhavenCity of TrentonGrosse Ile TownshipSecroit Planning DepartmentDetroit Area Agency on Aging 1-ASoutheastern Michigan Transportation Authority (SEMTA)County Planning Offices of Livingston, Mecomb, Monroe,Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw and Wayne

City of Monroe

.

. .

-

A -W, , , , , , , , , , , ..

Wayne County :! U O ' i

i, y+sf Planning Commission-A :

.

-

,,,,,,,...~

2x c,1.. coo ~,,. ,,,,~o .WGEI\ RED-

w-~m2 -ooow .o m ~n,. . . . . . . . . . . . .einoi,. micnic ~ 4 2u

JUN 261987 .. . . . . . ~l ~' " ' "

ruo~e ai u 224.n i.. . . . . .

. ... - a . . e- . . . . . .

SyyCOG. " . - . . -n.... .. e........o......,... .....June 25, 1981 c saa a . - * -, ' . . . . ' . . .CLVDE L. P.L E.

- eN S.5,.C.

ES,se.L. WILS..e

Mr. Richard PfaffSoutheast Michigan Council of Gove27.ments800 Book Building1249 Washington Boulevard

-

Detroit, Michigan 482261

Dear Mr. Pfaff:

Please be advised that the Wayne County Planning Commission is inreceipt of the Draft Environmental Statement related to the operation ofEnrico Fermi Atemic Power Plant Unit No. 2 in Monroe County, Michigan.

The document was referrec to the Public Works Committee of the WayneCounty Board of Commissioners en Jure 23, 1981, at which time the Statementwas received and filed with no comment.

The Wayne County Planning Cc::=tission did receive ec=ments submitted byother Wayne County agencies, which are attached.

-

Respectfully submitted,

|42WL/--c.9 {V' -

qMaurice W. Roach, DirectorWayne County Planning Commission

MWR/pf '

cc: Clarence Young

Encl.

.

*

, - -. == *

_ .m - . ~ ~

. .

Qg/ n'1.: k* DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHK *' ^ ' " ' ' " " " "" t***"1 "'%y[8dF 't;$:< ey

nascet.suan3 3 Q AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISIONh-1

Q- Q- s ,| 3 a e m msi.r.o o oRrnE 1311 EAST IEFFERSONoaw

, aA .. e- DETROIT. MICHICAN 482c7 ,onu5 syoeg

Deputv Dmw

%-%'_ # ,- Telephone: (2131 224-4E5er

- - . _ -4.

,

MORTON sT[ RUNG

Air Polluten n o8 Damma

June 5, 1981Q Q7

JUN 81981

Mr. Maurice W. Roach, DirectorWayne County Planning Cc=nission ygyg cggy puggg730 City-County Building COMMISSION

2 Woodward AvenueDetroit, MI 4S225 -

Dear Mr. Roach: '

Subject: Response to Your Letter of June 1,1981 Relative to the DraftEnvironmental Impact Statement Concerning Proposed Operationof the Enrico Femi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2.

We have reviewed the summary and conclusion in the Draft EnvironmentalImpact Statement described above. Since this facility may impact theco=: unities along the Detroit River, the MOTAP (Michigan-Ontario Trans-boundary Air Pollution) Committee of the International Joint Comissionis involved in preparing a ecmprehensive contingency plan which will befollowed to ensure that the appropriate authorities on the state sideas well as the Canadian side are infomed in the event of accidentalreleases into the atmosphere of material having significant environmental -

impact. I would suggest that you advise Mr. L. Shenfeld, Chief - AirQuality & Meteorology, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 880 BayStreet, 4th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Ontario N5S IZ3 of this particularDraft Environmental Impact Statement so that appropriate action couldfollow. Mr. Shenfeld is currently the chairman of the MOTAP Cos:titteeof the International Joint Commission. -

Thank you very much for this opportunity of reviewing this material.,

Ye truly yours,-- , // .

,WBenjamin Baskin, P.E.-

Engineering Supervisor~

BB:1s -

.

cc: Mr. L. Shenfeld .*

.

Branch: DOWNRfVER OmCI

WYAN E MICHICAN 48192Telennone: (313) 2m

e

.- eums. .

. ,

/

S l ; ? 6.-

||E Q \~

j:,-| f u- U,

.x w: t ;. -

-. . .

%fp?. fM: C& Wi .%J'-

QgWayne County intermediate School District

June 18, 1981

Mr. Richard Pf affRegional Review OfficeSoutheast Michigan Council of Governments gb3 31.

-

800 Book BuildingDetroit, Michigan 48225 $gEQQG.

Re: A-95 Review of Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Applicant: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

Area Clearinghouse Code: LU 810205

Dear Mr. Pfaff:

The above-referenced project has been reviewed by our Office of Stateand Federal Programs. The only expected significant impact that theEnrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2, could have on the WayneCounty Intermediate School District and its constituents would be thatof radiation released in the event that emergency conditions occur. ,

It is realized that if Detroit Edison follows all safe operation pro-cedures and if the Nuclear Regulatory Commission enforces all theregulations applicable to this facility, the chances of emergencyconditions occurring are very low.

It is recommended that the plan advising the public what to do in theevent of a nuclear emergency at this facility be included in the finalEnvironment Impact Statement.

Sincerely,

#" #Susan M. Sommer, Consultant'

State / Federal ProgramsSMS/ml

cc: Othello Colecchia.

Wayne County Planning Comission

Board of Education

Boyd W. Arthurs, Geroidine W. Joyner, Carl W. Morris, Richard R. Muse, Dorneau V. Stewart

Wittiam Simmons. Superintendent

33500 Van Born Road. Wayne, Michigan 48184 (313) 326-9300 (From Det.oit, 274-5000)

.

.

- '.o

MAgW ,3 r_.3 !@../

COUNTY OF OAKLANDD ANIEL T. MURPHY. COUNTY EXECUTIVE

bbCE$gg' June 16, 1981

JUN y 9 yMr. Daniel SnyderSoutheast Michigan Council SEMCOkof Goverments800 Book Building1249 Washington Elvd.Detroit, MI 48226

Fe: Cperation of D:rico Fe=i Atcmic Fower Plant, Uhit No. 2County Control No.: 81-61. 6 Code No.: LU 810205

Dear Mr. Snyder:

Our office has received and reviewed de above project as sulrdttedby the U.S. Nuclear Fegulatory Caccission.

As a part of our review process, our office sent infor=ation on thisproject to the Oakland County Department of Public Works, Er.3ency ,

Medical Services / Disaster Control, Etcan Services and the Health Department.Attached is the response of Public Works and the DS/ Disaster ControlDivision.

This project does not conflict with the plans and/or policies ofthe County Planning Division and we recocoend approval contigent uponF.nrico Fer=i Atoc:ic Power Plant officials addressing the recarandationsrequested by the DS/ Disaster Control Unit of the county.

(

-Sincerely, % - I,-

-s - . . _ s

DPhilip W. vonderoManager

PWD:hk

cc: Deborah SchuttPaul Phelps

Division of P!anning, Administrative Annex 111200 NORTH TELEGR AP11 RO AD. PONTI AC. MICHIG AN +sosa

(313) B55-0720

= ,

.

EO4 q

'[ ,'* k I.

\'. l.:$ 5:~*Q:W

COUNTY Q{ OAKLANDDANIEL T. M URPUY. COUNTY EXECUTIVE

June 8, 1981&

Ms. Debble SchuttOakland County Planning Div.County Service CenterPontiac, Mich. 48053

Re: Operation of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2

Dear Ms. Schutt:

I have reviewed the summary and conclusions of the draft environmentalimpact statement which was prepared by the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission in regards to the operation of the Enrico Fermi AtomicPowe r Plant , Unit No. 2, located in Monroe County.

As far as I can determine from the information reviewed, theoperation of the Power Plant Unit 2 will not effect any of theOakland County Public Works' activities. '

.

Best regards,3 ,

,y -

, , /lif$ - A Ei *

'N'ilton V. Handorf, P.E.Di rec to rDept. of Public Wo-ks

'

MUH/mah

Department of Public Works1300 wonTu TELron ueu aco4 0. PoxTra c. 3t scuro Arf eeO53

,u g. oc o .eo

.

.

9

OAKLAND COUNTYfrster-Departmental M emo

Date June 16, 1991

Frorn: Paul R. Phelps, E.M.S./ Disaster Control Division

aro. Debbie Schutt, Planning Division

operation of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Subject: n,it ::;, ; = t ; gn;,;; ,t;; :q;;t :t;u,=t

r

In response to your correspondence dated May 26, 1981, relative to the above, Iwould like to provide the following comments for inclusion in your report tothe Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.

I am extremely concerned about two matters, both of which sould have a directimpact on Oakland County's environment.

First, even though the environmental risk from accidental radiation exposure orother accident is very low according to the reports, the possibility stillexists that one could occur. This possibility results in t ie need to properlyprepare plans to act accordingly in the event of a mass eva uation declaration.

I would, however, like to point out that we presently are r >t thoroughly preparedto effectively implement our plans to evacuate a large nu.1tr of persons.

Secondly, the transportation of nuclear waste materials through Cakland Countywould pose another risk to the environment. Again, the risks would result inthe preparation of plans to effectively respond to accidents or sabotage.

Because of these two identified environmental risks, I would ask the Enrico FermiAtomic Power Plant officials to act favorably on the following recommendations.

1. To establish and maintain a close liaison relationship with this Division.*

. ..

2. To provide information relative to the potential risks associated with theplant's operations.

3. To assist in the preparation of plans to respond to accidental radiation exposureor other accident situations.

4. To report forthwith to this Division any occurrance of an unusual or importantevent that indicates or could result in signif' ant environmental impact.

5. To conduct or participate in continuing education classes or seminars on provid-ing information to respond to accidents.

If you have any questions, or desire eny additional information, please call me at858-1283.

PEP:mr.ec: P.obert E. Chisholm

.

$ /

Monroe Countyv"*o#

d **4 Planning Departments; g s & Commissionp r,., 1410 EAST FIRST STREET , MONROE. MICHIGAN 4 8161v T.I, shone. (313) 243-7093

1817

ROYCE R. MAN;KO,Planning Director r= \

BERNARO J. FELDER.Commission Chairman

JUN 15 L:31

SEMCOG

June 11, 1981

.

Daniel R. Snyder, ManagerLand Use & Energy ProgramsSoutheast Michigan Council of Gov'ts8th Floor, Book Building1249 Washington BoulevardDetroit, Michigan 48226

.lNLADear Mr. c..jd er:

<

RE: LU 810205 Operation of Enrico Fermi IIDraft Environmental I= pact Statement

We have been unable to undertake an adequate review of the above prefaced =atterdue to lack of sufficient time. At the June 10, 1981 meeting the Monroe CountyPlanning Co ission considered the matter and authorized me to request a thirty(30) day extension of the review period.

Your attention to this requast wuuld be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

l"Df'y' .

Royce R. Maniko, AICPPlanning Director

RRM/kt

.

.

/

A/ A42 /v\onroe County Planning Department.Mprea |$ and Comm.:ssione8 .

;o

['s.e@.e:yjjf6 1410 EAST FIRST STREET MONROE, MICHIGAN 46161.

-v# T.iephone: (313) 243-6900 Ent. 277ra17

July 9,1981

ROYCE R. MANIKO,m, , , o r,~, '

RECEIVEDBERNARD J. FELCER.c - r,s ca.,, .. JUL 131981 _

,

DATE

y]ESouthecst IAichigen A 5g

Council of Governments cguset o, copus8th Fl. Book Bldg.,1249 WcshingtonDetroit, IAichigan 48226

Attn. : Dcniel Snyder

Subiect: Draft Environmental Impcet Statement CIAB A-95 200.2-5-81-30Rogional Impact - Frenchtown Township. Monroe County,MichigenAreewide C!ecringhouse Code: LU 810205

Decr tar. Snyc:er.

We have completed our review cf the cbove prefaced subject matter end advise es follows:

"/Aoved by tar. White end seconded by Mr. Swick that the IAonroe County Plen-ning Commission cceept end place on file this review cnd forwcrd the commentsoutlined herein to the Southecst IAichigen Council of Governments end the U.S.Nuclect Regulctory Commission.

.

IAction Cerried.".

We further enclose o copy of staff memercndom in this regcrd to indicate the considerctionswhich went into the resolution of this issue.

Thank you for ellowing us this opportunity to respond to the sub;ect metter es it effects crec-wide plans cdepted by our Planning Commission.

Sincerely,

-] C4- N.

Royce R. /Acniko, Director

Enclosure

R?JA:mm

.

.

OM3: A-95 RD iE' V TMonroe County, Michigan 1981)1

MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT: F

TO: Monroe County Planning CommissionDATE: June 29, 1981

T R OM: staffSUBJECT: C a se No. 200.2 - 5-81-20Draf t Environmental Impact StatementRegional impact - Frenchtown TownshipMonroe County, MichiganProject Descriotion

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Com ission has submitted a Draf t EnvironmentalStatement for Areavide Clearinghouse review. The proposed action is for the issuanceof an operating license to the Detroit Edison Company for the startup ar.d operationof the Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2< Thn nuclear plant is located on Lake Erie inMonroe County, approximately eight miles northeast of Monroe, Michigan.*

The facility will support a boiling-water reactor (BWR) to produce up to 3428 mega-watts thermal. A steam turbine generator will use this heat to produce approximately1150 net regawatts of electrical power capacity.

The information in this statement represents the second assessment of the environmentalimpact associated with Enrico Fermi 2 pursuant to the guidelines of the National En-viron= ental Policy Act of 1969 and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations /Part 51(10 CFR 51) of the Cc= mission's regulations. Af ter an application to construct this ,

plant was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 1969, their staffreviewed impacts that would occur during the construction and operation of this plant.The staff evaluation was issued as a Final Environmental Statement (FES) in July 1972.As a result of that environmental review, a safety review, an evaluation by the Ad-visory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, and public hearings in Monroe, Michigan, andWashington, D.C., the NRC issued a permit in Septe=ber 1972 for the construction ofEnrico Fermi 2. As of March 1981, the construction of Enrico Fermi 2 was 30% complete.With a proposed fuel loading date of November 1982, Detroit Edison has applied for alicense to operate the plant and sub=itted (in October 1974) the required safetyand environmental reports to support this application. This Draft EnvironmentalStatement (DES) presents the activities associated with the proposed operation of theplant, and potential impacts, as viewed by NRC scaff.

Co==ents/ Analysis

It cust be noted that this DES was net produced by the Detroit Edison Co=pany but bythe Nuclear Regulatory Commission. After extensive in-house review, Monroe CountyPlanning staff invited several other aEencies to review the document and air theirconcerns 1 a meeting with Detroit Edison personnel. The other agencies include:the City of Monroe, Department of Co=munity Develop ent; the Menroe County DrainCo==ission; and the Monroe County Office of Civil Preparedness.

Pl nning staff developed an extensive list of concerns that were brought out at thezee ing with Detroit Edison. Many of the concerns were the result of the highlytechnical nature of the document. Many of the questions were due to a lack of technicalknowledge on staff's part in areas such as: aquatic biology, radiosensitivity ofliving organis s, meteorciogical dispersion of radioactive caterials, ett., and wereeasily explained by Detroit Edisen personnel. The follcwing outline presents. concernsthat were not answered by Edison staff to the satisfaction of Planning staff.

, .

r s

i

200.5-6-81-20 page 2

In several instances, Edison personnel and staff members shared the same concerns,

over portions of the report.

1. In the portion of the document that su==arizes Regional k'ater Use (pg 2-6) NRCstaff suggested that "by State standards, the water (Lake Erie) is consideredto be polluted to the extent that sports involving total body contact with thewater should be avoided." Although this statement may have been true severalyears ago, staff feels it is erroneous at this time. This opinion has beenverified by the Director of the Monroe County Environ = ental Health Division.

2. Under the title Envirenmental I= pacts (4.4)(4.4.1.1) it is stated that threeendangered or threatened species exist on the site, the American Lotus (endan-gered) the Swa=p-Rose Hibiscus (threatened), the Eastern Fox-Snake (threatened),and further "because station operation will not involve destruction of habitatbeyond that which has already occurred during construction, the staff believesthat these species will not be effected." Planning staff feels that this isinsufficient in terms of what has happened. NRC staff does not mention whetheror not all, or a little, or a substantial amount of habitat has already beendestroyed. In the following paragraph the same argu=ent was used for acceptablelevels of noise. They just state that noise levels af ter construction will~bemore acceptable that those during construction with no explanation of what thenoise levels during construction affected.

3. Section 4.5.4 Radiological Impacts on Biota Other Than Humans; in the beginningof this section NRC staff reports that " terrestrial and aquatic biota willreceive doses approximately the sa=e or somewhat higher than humans receive",while in the last sentence of the section they state that "other living organisms(other than humars) are not much more radiosensitive than humans." This suggeststo Planning staff that on one hand biota vill receive .the same or more radiationthan humans and on the other that living organis=s are more radiosensitive(however small) than humans. Staff interprets this to mean that other livingorzanisms will be affected to a 2reater extent than humans while at the sametime having less protection and resistance.

It must be noted here that Edison personnel explained that very few studieshave been completed in terms of radiose'hsitivity to living organisms other thanhumans, resulting in a situation that makes it very difficult to draw clearconclusions. Although staff acknowledges this fact we still feel uneasy withthe aforecentiened statements.

4 In section 6.1.2 Accident Experience and Cbserved != pacts NRC staff discussesthe impacts of an accident on the public. They state that no significant impacts(due to accidents) -are likely to occur over time periods of a few decades (EnricoFermi 2 reactor life - 40 years). They furthar state that "This experience baseis not large enough to permit a reliable quantitive statistical inference."Planning staff feels tlat if their experiet.ce base is not extensive enough topermit reliable quantitive statistical inference, they should not state thatno significant i= pacts are likely to occur cue to accidents.

5. Lastly, staf f, in reviewing the document observed numerous state =ents and setsof data that were dated and no longer correct. Qetroit Edison personnel con-curred with staff's concerns in these areas and are forwarding their concentsto the NRC.

Several other concerns were raised by other County agencies although they were notissues related to this specific document and will be brought up at the appropriatetime.

.

/

4

200.2-5-51-20 page 3

geernendation

Staf f t eco::= ends that the Monroe County Planning Cocaission accept and place on filethis review and forward the concents outlined herein to the Southeast Michigan Councilof Governt ents and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cocsission.

.

O

. .

s) ? 5RCdk.ET J. NORWOOD b \ EDWARD G. DANIELSW ,,

Supervisor - 242m ,

D - ' " ARLENE M. GERWECK'"

BERNARD J. TELDER

JACQLEL NE } POUssELO b N7 4@ - - VR R. sTRA~. ,,.

Treasurer - 242 EX,2 "FRENCHTOWN ' CHARTER TOWNSHIP

~2744 VIVIAN ROAD - MCNRCE, MICHIGAN 43161

.

'

May 27, 1981

Southeast Michigan Council of Governments DRegional Review Office800 Book Building MAY 291981Detroit, Michigan 48226

Attn: Daniel R. Snyder, Manager SEMCOGLand Use and Energy Programs .

Dear Mr. Snyder: '

There are no objections to the draft supplement of the environmental state-ment in regards to the issuance of an operating license for the Enrico FermiAtomic Power Plant Unit Two; subject to all the conditions recommended bythe Staff for the Protection of the Environment, namely, " License Conditions:and "Significant Environmental Protection Requirements."

Respectfully,

fk$ . M':: bRobert J. NorwoodSupervisorFrenchtown Chertir Township

RJN/se.

cc: file.

.

.

._-e * * *

.

.

-

//

Jefferson Schools

5102 North stoney Cfeck Road Monroe. !.tichigan 4bl61* Telephone (313) 299 - 4200*

James tron Erm:1 Jones Athletic feepanment Verma LaBeauAs, nie w.sene ..t & n.wers dassalent Seppersmaenssent Tesophone 2hb42fS E st 9 71rrector Compensa49ey EducasaeaEsemensory Curruestuen Cooraanosor

HIGH SCHrJUL SODT CL.LMENTAR Y SCHOOL HURD RD CLCMENTAR Y SCHOOL M! DOLE SCHOOL-4,.... m %,. , nn.o sw a esare n,..a sre a m e, r av.. e. ans essa ane w two oneHas n ..no t.cs ser s e Allen Pearsall. Princap s Joe.n Mueller. Pr4acopas Jon Rhoades.Prenespas.s.

, rertrarm 5.aen 4. .e i a. . . . .

Charles Kennon Ass: Prsprepei

R bhyggJune I, 1 I

Mr. D. Snyder, Mgr. '%Southeast Michigan Council of Governments800 Sock Building k,MCQgyDetroit, Michigan 46226

Dear Mr. Snyder,:

. We agree 100% with the draft of the Environmental impact statement.-

. In fect, the school district is extremely pleased and honored and feelsvery positive of having the Enrico Fermi Plant in our area.

One of the many reasons why we feel positive about the Fermi Plantis because they have been approved and in *he process of building alarge building that will house a number of research scientists andengineering employees. These professional individuals moving into ourarea, we feel, will be an asset to this community.

In summary, our feeling is that the im::act of The Enrico FermiPlent will be a very positive influence on our community.

.- ncerely,

/;/ />'.

. ///AW ,f,t /

*

,

Jame- , gen. /-

se '-

Superintendent,

mJE/:1

.

~-,.

COUU"y.2C0m 3.

3 alTilmo Comm1SS10U e....,. W.,. .,o.i.

G..,,. ..r.,kt , o o. et.,~.r

n5 Su Groesbe:i Highway. Motmt Clemcm Michigan. 4SG:3 Richard C. RooseWilla,d D. eack (313) 4(f).3233 A ..i no o,, ecto,

v.c. Ct.a.,m n

Walter Franchukm r..r.

.

K *',"'",",,#8'"c'" " July 1, 1981 RECEIVED, , , ,

James P. GeorgeDenis R. Le Ducr,. . u.e1,v JUL 6-1991

Rot. ort A. Ve, Kuilen

Mr. Michael M. Glusac SEMCOGExecutive Director - ' - -

Southeast Michigan Councilof Governments

800 Book BuildingDetroit, MI 48226

Re: Notice of Draft Environmental StatementRelated to Cperation of Enrico FermiAtomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionDetroit Edison Company

Dear Mr. Glusac:

In accordance with established A-95 Clearinghouse pro-cedures, we have reviewed the Draft Environ = entalStatement related to the operation of Enrico FermiAtomic Power Plant, Unit No. 2, submitted by the U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The Offices of Macomb County Health Services andEmergency Services were contacted with regard to thisdocument. Enclosed is a copy of the response fromthe Macomb County Health Services office. The Officeof Emergency Services has indicated that they had noobjection to the proposed operation of the p wer plantas long as all safety regulations are complied with.

.

Macomb County Board of Commissioners a- Emec-~=c mt o ,<....,vee Cha.rrnsar ., men

Donaio Gu c v in.- Dm'.ct 6 *s, rce A. Aimouist - 0 strict 11 Stamew A Beart - D*stret '6 Soran L. 8.e o - D str.ct 7tmore , A te- e.u..en - D stect t e e

a ,, ana ; y ,g ,. , p ,ge,ct ? Aa'te* D.iDer Jr. - Distret ? Dou; as CaN - 3.stert 12 ,ames J Steep - District 17 w fira D Sack Distr.ct 3w ro.c L Drove - D st et 18 s neet J. vannee *utten - D nectv * A 5=- , gn - D. strict 3 ;ames L vcDctav - Dist et O 't...ter seenchuu - Dest ct 13 a u

a

*.c rc 3 Sa:auga - D r ict 4 .oaa Joneso Bucm.ato - D' street 9 Raymono M i*ambrev - D st'et is Euratete v S:.noe - D str ct '9 s see J Jamota..c2 - D ut.ct 24

's- J *ete - D nect 5 *sion A. Daruso - Distret 10 varv Louise *,acer - D.stect 16 Donec G. Tarao.imi- 31stect 'D eas..e J. Jonason - D.ne.ct 25

,.

.

.

.

/Mr. Michael M. Glusac/ July 1, 1981 page 2

.

I

The staff of the Macomb County Planning Commissionhas reviewed the general p.",anning data containedin the document such as, land use, populationcharacteristics, recreational activities and otherurban services and finds no conflict with ourprograms or information. This review has beenconducted with the assumption that the appropriatefederal, state and local requirements will be met.Sincerely,

a| W8$#,/{Bernard E. Giampetroni /Director

BEG:JWB: bas REGEl'v.-_..:-. ..losure.'

Jy( 6 .----1::::

Robert A. VerKuilen, Chairmancc:

Macomb County Board of Commissioners S EM e -- <=-Norman Hill, AdministratorMacomb County Health Services

John Perry, CoordinatorEmergency Services

-

t

.

/

.'

MACOMB COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'

/

43525 ELIZABETH DAN EL C. LAFFE'C*seatm creicer

MOUNT CLEMENS, MICHIGAN 45043LELAND C. BRO *.*lr* d- _

Medical Direc::rSCAR: OF COMMISSICEERS 4,,

y.Reeert L.VerKuilen

Criairman* ' ' ' " ' ' ' June 25, 1981

Raymosf D f4ystakowskiDistnct 2

Maru A. StreceeranDis rct 3

Rict ard 3 SabaugnQastrct 4

Bernard E. Giarpetronio Directcr$3m 2 vet,tto

Ocstuct 5 Macomb County Planning Ccn=ission115 South Groesheck HighwayDonasa c urezyesgi

D'st 'ct s Mount Clemens Michigan 48043e

Wafter Delber. Jr..

Ocsuct7 Re: Draft Environmental Statement Related to

James E v::wsry the Cperation of Enrico TermiVice-Cha rman Atomic Power Planto Unit No. 2

Distret aU. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cow.!ssion --

John Josep*:BucceHato Detrolt Edison CompanyCarstnct 9

Ralph A. Caruso Dear Mr. Giampetroni:Destrict 10

Terrancr a s.in.cuest We have given a cursory review of the material forwarded to us*'''"'' '

relative to the above mentioned project. We shall interpose noDoug<asCao objection to the proposed operation - providing the plant emergency* ' ' " * ' ' ' plan is approved by the Michigan Department of Public Health andW* ' *r ' r*" =''u n all other applicable, Federal, State and local requirements are

DistnCt 13adhered to.

Raymond H. TrombleyDestrict 14

If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to call uponuse; Louise Dever og,

Distnct 15

stan'ev A. even gjncerely,Distnct 16

J**** d 5"*'DMACOM" 707NTY HEALTH DEPARTNENTDestnct 17

/- j

*#Haroid E Grove 7,Q. GDestre:t 18 { j

Dani 1 C. La!!e ty | w

33 7ggggfjygg . g3 gggg ggy s, G ) *. ~ 'Ef.zatetn t.1 S;ince

O.str a n ,

JUN295MDoea;a c a,,o.,,s.e

Dis: t 20

LEhe'st b '

'"**$',,$ j ,''," DCL/xED/=2 P8 ag;yq c5,,,, , ,j;,. ,

W.srarc 0 Ba:0.s ra- 2-g

M., cert J '. ,e ce<N:*en0:a te *! 4 ;n

~

F r a * * 1 .,i,* : .nc zD we *24

Ett "rac. ,ENT AL PE/ LIM "ttNicSERuCES FEs<SDNAL ME ALTM SEpvlCES IN'CF"- ~~

.

P3*?"= f 1 * * *. ca 4G S226 464'472 46%$523 # ~~#'; . . r - r

e

. .

p/. ' (

CD Ul/7)"V.s WASHTEN AW COUNTYgfaj 0

- . b (J %,$ METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION=$ tf c:=::s

]@M 30s covNTY suitotNGuA N AND HURON STREETS4 ..o. .ex ms

18 2._0 =~Aneta.uic ,c= = = m m .ms

DtPECTORThomas J. Fegan

June 4, 1981

JUN 8- 1981

Daniel R. Snyder, Manager SEMCOGLand Use ProgramSoutheast Michigan Council of Governments1249 Washington Elvd.800 Book Bldg. County Ref. No. 204-39-B1Detroit, MI 48226 SEMCOG Ref. No. LU 810205

Dear Mr. Snyder:

In accordance with Federal OMB Circular A-95 and review proceduresestablished by the Southeast Michigan Council of Govern =ents (SEMCOG),the Washtenaw County Metropolitan Planning Co= mission (WCMFC) has reviewedthe Draft Environ = ental Impact Statement from the United States NuclearRegulatory Co= mission for a project titled " Operation of the EnricoFermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit II".

According to the information provided by the applicant, the proposedaction is the issuance of an operating license to the Detroit EdisonCompany for the start up and operation of the Enrico Fer=1 Atomic PowerPlant, Unit II, located on Lake Erie in Monroe County, approximatelyeight miles northeast of Monroe, Michigan.

In reviewing this proposal, staff contacted Dr. John Atwater, Directorof the Washtenaw County Health Department. Dr. Atwater indicated hisagency was aware of, and had no conflict with, the Fermi II proposal.Staff found no conflict with this proposal and any County or local landuse plan or policy and therefore reco== ends approval of the request.

Sincerely, /

/ m

*L

Rob rt L. etensAssociate .lanner

RLT:wps

_

* ..

'

Southeas:ern Micnigan Lar v E Salci Homer CaseTranspor:ation Authority Genera / Mar: ape- Wilha n A. Cillutto

Walter FranchukFirst Nationaf Buising Boarc of Directors Thomas Fegan660 Woocwarc Avenue Dennis O. GreenDetroit. Micnigan J.82.'S R. J. Alemancer Dwight 64avem .

313 256-8000 Chairman Dewirt J. HenryRuco:on M. McCullough Peu! Kasper*

:st vice-Chairman Ecwarc H M:NamaraGeorge Lahoony Nar si 1. Rowe2nd vice-Chairmarr James J. Snaro

Tom Turner .

.r- c:: = .- =.> -- - aa . w

REGEtVEDJune 12, 198

JUN 161981

SEMCOG.Mr. Daniel Snyder, ManagerLand Use & Energy ProgramsSoutheast Michigan Council

of Governments800 Book Building .

Detroit, Michigan 48226.

RE: LU 810205, Operation of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant. -

Unit No. 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Dear Mr. Snyder:.

The staff of the Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority

(SEMTA) has reviewed the above-:cferenced DEIS. Based on thatreview, we have no comments.

Sincerely yours,*

| M-- a

Harry L. RogersManagerProject Control and Progra==ing

.

- /sg.

6

.

O *M Ne- 4

*' -O # "NM N @ e e e N NW wp e e

.-

. .,

'

/ - f. 7 (*

DETROIT AREA AGENCY ON AGING -

3110 Book Building1249 Washington Soutevard

Detroit, Michigan 48226013) 961 6680

.

.

Shelton Tappes Virginia Crowthers.

Chairperson Executive DirectorBoard of Directors

.

July 2, 1981

Mr. Daniel R. Synder, Manager RECEIVEDLand Use & Energy ProgramsSoutheast Michigan Council of Govern =ents

JUL 6 SB1i800 Book BuildingDetroit, Michigan 48226

.-

SEMCOGRE: LU B10205

Dear Mr. Synder:

Please be advised the goals and objectives of this project do not fallwithin the persual of the Detroit Area Agency on Agir3

).

&'

Frances F. Mosley

.

FM:bj7/2/51 ._

-

d

a