39
Rother District Council PLANNING COMMITTEE 4 November 2004 Minutes of the Planning Committee held at the Town Hall, Bexhill on Thursday 4 November 2004 at 9.30am. Present:- Councillors C.N. Ramus (Chairman), R.E. Parren (Vice Chairman), R.F. Dyason, P. Fairhurst, Mrs J.P. Gadd (in part), G.E.S. Hearn, J.A.J. Kemp, B. Kentfield, C.R. Maynard, Mrs. W.M. Miers, C.F. Starnes, R. White and Mrs. D.C. Williams. Also present: Councillors C.A. Clark (in part), Mrs. J.M. Hughes (in part), R.H. Patten (in part) and Mrs. S.M. Prochak (in part). Advisory Officers in attendance: Head of Planning, Principal Planning Officer (Development Control), Principal Planning Officer (Enforcement) (in part), Senior Planning Officer (in part) and Democratic Services Officer. PL57. MINUTES The Chairman was authorised to sign the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 7 October 2004 as a correct record of the proceedings. PL58. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Cllrs. Mrs. H.R. Bridger and D.W.L.M. Vereker (ex-officio). DECISIONS TAKEN UNDER DELEGATED POWERS PL59. ENFORCEMENT MATTERS 1

Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

Rother District Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE4 November 2004

Minutes of the Planning Committee held at the Town Hall, Bexhill on Thursday 4 November 2004 at 9.30am.

Present:- Councillors C.N. Ramus (Chairman), R.E. Parren (Vice Chairman), R.F. Dyason, P. Fairhurst, Mrs J.P. Gadd (in part), G.E.S. Hearn, J.A.J. Kemp, B. Kentfield, C.R. Maynard, Mrs. W.M. Miers, C.F. Starnes, R. White and Mrs. D.C. Williams.

Also present: Councillors C.A. Clark (in part), Mrs. J.M. Hughes (in part), R.H. Patten (in part) and Mrs. S.M. Prochak (in part).

Advisory Officers in attendance: Head of Planning, Principal Planning Officer (Development Control), Principal Planning Officer (Enforcement) (in part), Senior Planning Officer (in part) and Democratic Services Officer.

PL57. MINUTES

The Chairman was authorised to sign the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 7 October 2004 as a correct record of the proceedings.

PL58. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Apologies for absence were received from Cllrs. Mrs. H.R. Bridger and D.W.L.M. Vereker (ex-officio).

DECISIONS TAKEN UNDER DELEGATED POWERS

PL59. ENFORCEMENT MATTERS

The following enforcement matters were reported:

(1) Battle – 6 Netherfield Way – land rear of -Use of agricultural land and building for domestic storage and recreation and the erection of a satellite dish.

RESOLVED: That, subject to being satisfied evidentially, the District Secretary be authorised to issue the appropriate enforcement notice and take any other steps necessary including taking legal action under Sections 179 and 181 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.Compliance period: One month.

1

Page 2: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

(2) Battle – Netherfield Place, Netherfield Road - Erection of lighting columns

RESOLVED: That the District Secretary be authorised to withdraw the enforcement notice issued on 16 June 2004.

(3) Bexhill – 33 Sackville Road -Replacement of shop front and installation of fume extraction system in breach of condition.

RESOLVED: That, subject to being satisfied evidentially, the District Secretary be authorised to issue the appropriate enforcement notice and breach of condition notice and take any other steps necessary including taking legal action under Sections 179 and 181 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.Compliance period: Step (i) One week; and

Step (ii) Three months.

(4) Bexhill – 100 Dorset Road –Change of use of dwelling house to house in multiple occupation.

RESOLVED: That, subject to being satisfied evidentially, the District Secretary be authorised to issue the appropriate enforcement notice and take any other steps necessary including taking legal action under Sections 179 and 181 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.Compliance period: Three months.

(5) Northiam – ‘Spindlewood’, Station Road – Dormer window not built in accordance with approval RR/2002/2141/P and breach of condition – unauthorised additional dormer window.

At the meeting an update sheet was circulated to Members which included an additional breach of planning control on this site.

RESOLVED: That, subject to being satisfied evidentially, the District Secretary be authorised to issue the appropriate enforcement notice and take any other steps necessary including legal action under Sections 179 and 181 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.Compliance period: Six months.

(6) Etchingham – Shortridge Farm, Sheepstreet LaneOccupation of dwelling without complying with condition 2 of planning permission RR/83/1147.

RESOLVED: That, subject to being satisfied evidentially, the District Secretary be authorised to issue the appropriate enforcement notice and take any other steps necessary including legal action under Sections 179 and 181 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.Compliance period: Twelve months.

2

Page 3: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

(7) Pett – Two Sawyers Public House, Pett Road - Erection of external timber staircase and alteration of first floor window into door and extension to roof line.

RESOLVED: That, subject to being satisfied evidentially, the District Secretary be authorised to issue the appropriate enforcement notice and take any other steps necessary including legal action under Sections 179 and 181 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990; and a Listed Building enforcement notice including legal action under Section 38 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas Act) 1990.Compliance period: Six months.

PL60. PLANNING APPLICATIONS

Outline planning permissions are granted subject to approval by the Council before any development is commenced, of the siting, design, external appearance of the buildings, means of access thereto and landscaping. Unless otherwise stated, every planning permission is granted subject to the development beginning within 5 years from the date of the permission - or in regard to outline permissions, in the case of reserved matters, application for approval within three years from the date of the grant of outline permission; and the development to which the permission relates must begin no later than whichever is the later of the following dates: the expiration of five years from the date of the grant of outline permission or, the expiration of two years from the final approval of the reserved matters, or in the case of approval on different dates, the final approval of the last such matters to be approved.

In certain circumstances the Planning Committee will indicate that it is only prepared to grant or refuse planning permission if, or unless certain amendments to a proposal are undertaken or subject to completion of outstanding consultations. In these circumstances the Head of Planning can be given delegated authority to issue the decision of the Planning Committee once the requirements of the Committee have been satisfactorily complied with. A delegated decision does not mean that planning permission or refusal will automatically be issued. If there are consultation objections, difficulties, or negotiations are not satisfactorily concluded, then the application will have to be reported back to the Planning Committee or placed on the Reserved List as a means of providing further information for elected members. This delegation also allows the Head of Planning to negotiate and amend applications, conditions, reasons for refusal and notes commensurate with the instructions of the Committee. Any applications which are considered prior to the expiry of the consultation reply period are automatically delegated for a decision.

RESOLVED: That the planning applications be determined as shown in Appendix A attached hereto.

PL61. PLANNING OBLIGATIONS

RESOLVED: That in relation to the applications below:-

3

Page 4: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

a) the District Secretary be authorised to prepare a Planning Obligation under the provisions of Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in respect of the matters indicated; and

b) power be delegated to the Head of Planning, exercisable upon execution of the Obligation to the satisfaction of the District Secretary, to grant permission subject to the conditions stated.

(1) RR/2004/2340/P BEXHILL NAZARETH HOUSE, HASTINGS ROAD10 AUG 2004 ALTERATIONS TO CONSENT GRANTED UNDER

APPLICATION NO. RR/2003/2002/P COMPRISING ALTERATIONS TO CONVERSION SCHEME FOR MAIN BUILDING COURTYARD AND WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS AND CHAPEL; AND CHANGE OF USE OF CHAPEL FOR USE AS PRIVATE MEMBERS FITNESS AND LEISURE FACILITYHastings Road Development Ltd

Subject to further comments from the highways authority and the modification of the existing Section 106 Obligation in respect of alterations to the conversion scheme for the main building and outbuildings, the decision be delegated to the Head of Planning to grant full planning permission subject to the following conditions:

1. CN9A (Road construction details).2. CN8C (Foul and surface water - drainage - add - the total

discharge from the site shall not exceed 45 litres/sec).3. Prior to being discharged into any watercourse, surface water

sewer or soakaway system, all surface water drainage from parking areas and hardstandings shall be passed through an oil separator designed and constructed to have a capacity and details compatible with the site being drained. Roof water shall not pass through the separator.

4. Any facilities for the storage of oils fuels or chemicals shall be sited on impervious bases and surrounded by impervious bund walls. The bund capacity shall give 110% of the total volume for single and hydraulically linked tanks. If there is a multiple tankage, the bund capacity shall be 110% of the largest tank of 25% of the total capacity of all tanks, whichever is the greatest. All filling points, vents, gauges and sight glasses and overflow pipes shall be located within the bund. There shall be no outlet connecting the bund to any drain, sewer or watercourse or discharging onto the ground. Associated pipework shall be located above ground where possible and protected from accidental damage.

5. CN13A (Landscaping scheme) - Amended.6. CN13B (Implementation of landscaping scheme).7. CN10B (Car parking provision/service provision - amend to relate

to submitted drawings).8. Details of all hard surface areas within the site shall be submitted

to and be subject to the approval of the Local Planning Authority within two months of the date of this permission and the development shall be constructed in accordance with the approved details.

9. CN9H (Walls/fencing - amended).10. CN12L (Floodlighting control).

4

Page 5: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

11. All existing aluminium framed windows in the building shall be replaced with timber windows prior to the occupation of the building in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.

12. Within two months of the date of this permission fully detailed drawings of proposed

i) New windows and doors. The windows shall be of timber construction and include a flat gauged brick arch.

ii) Reinstatement of the original arched windows in the frontageiii) Making good the building following demolition of modern additions

as shown on the approved planiv) New balustrading

The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

13. CN7G (Schedule of materials).14. Within one month of the date of this permission the existing access

to Nazareth House shall be stopped up in accordance with details to be submitted to and be subject to the approval of the Local Planning Authority. All construction traffic shall use the proposed new access which shall be constructed to base course level and in accordance with details that shall be submitted to and be approved by the Local Planning Authority. No construction traffic shall use Larminier Drive.

N12A (Section 106 Obligation).

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

(2) RR/2004/1701/P FAIRLIGHT FAIRLIGHT GARAGE, BATTERY HILL23 JUN 2004 REVISED PROPOSALS RELATING TO AMENDED

SITE LAYOUT AND DESIGN FOR THE ERECTION OF FOUR DETACHED DWELLINGSGem Select Ltd

Subject to the amendment of the existing Section 106 Obligation on the extant permission with regard to the improved lay-by and the bus shelter, the decision be delegated to the Head of Planning to grant full planning permission subject to the following conditions:

1. The development must begin not later than the expiration of five years beginning with the date of this permission.Reason: In accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. Before any development commences the existing building(s) on the site shall be demolished and the site cleared of all resultant rubble and spoil, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.Reason: To ensure the satisfactory development of the site (CN120) and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

5

Page 6: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

3. No development shall take place until there has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority details of the guard rails and the colour, type and make of the roofing tiles, facing bricks and of the driveway’s finished surface. The development shall be carried out using the approved materials.Reason: To ensure that the development is in character with its surroundings and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991 - 2011. (CN7B)

4. No development shall take place until there has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority a scheme of landscaping, which shall include accurate indications of all existing trees and hedgerows on the land, and details of any to be retained, together with measures for their protection in the course of development.Reason: To maintain the characteristics of the locality and to accord with Policies S1, EN2 and EN3 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991 - 2011.

5. All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details of landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the occupation of the buildings or the completion of the development, whichever is the sooner; and any trees or plants which within a period of 5 years from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species, unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.Reason: To maintain the characteristics of the locality and to accord with Policies S1, EN2 and EN3 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991 - 2011. - AONB

6. Details of foul and surface water drainage for the site shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any work on the site commences. The drainage works shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans before the development hereby permitted is brought into use or occupied.Reason: To prevent water pollution, ensure satisfactory drainage of the site and accord with Policy EN11 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011. (CN8C)

7. Before any development takes place, detailed plans for boundary walls and fences on the site shall be submitted to and be subject to the approval of the Local Planning Authority. The fences and walls shall be constructed before the dwellings are first occupied and shall thereafter be retained in accordance with the approved details.Reason: To ensure the satisfactory development of the site and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011. (CN9I)

8. Before any development takes place, details for the protection/diversion of the public foul sewer crossing the site shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and the development shall not commence until the approved details have been undertaken.Reason: To safeguard the public foul sewer crossing the site, to ensure the satisfactory drainage of the site and to accord with

6

Page 7: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

Policy S1 of East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

9. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking and re-enacting this order) no windows except as shown on the approved plans shall be inserted into the building. Reason: To ensure appropriate development of the site and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991 - 2011. (CN5E)

10. The windows shall be glazed with obscure glass and shall thereafter be retrained in that condition in accordance with the following schedule:Plot 1: Within the west elevation at ground floor and first floor levels and the central rooflight. Within south elevation at first floor level serving the en-suite bathroom as per plan no. 2428.1.Plot 2: Within the west elevation at ground floor and first floor levels and the central rooflight. Within south elevation at first floor level serving the en-suite bathroom as per plan no. 2428.1.Plot 3: Within the north elevation at ground floor and first floor levels and the central rooflight. Plot 4: Within the north elevation at ground floor and first floor levels and the central rooflight.To prevent the overlooking of adjacent properties.

11. Any facilities for the storage of oils, fuels or chemicals shall be sited on impervious bases and surrounded by impervious bund walls. The bund capacity shall give 110% of the total volume for single and hydraulically linked tanks. If there is multiple tankage, the bund capacity shall be 110% of the largest tank or 25% of the total capacity of all tanks, whichever is the greatest. All filling points, vents, gauges and sight glasses and overflow pipes shall be located within the bund. There shall be no outlet connecting the bund to any drain, sewer or watercourse or discharging onto the ground. Associated pipework shall be located above ground where possible and protected from accidental damage.Reason: To prevent pollution of the water environment and to accord with Policy S1(g) of East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

12. The office in each dwelling shall be provided at the time of the development and shall only be used by the occupiers of the dwelling or employee of the residential occupiers for home working and shall not be separately occupied.

Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to regulate and control the development of the land and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

13. At the time of development and before it is occupied, the garages, parking spaces and shared access shall be provided and laid out within the site in accordance with the submitted plans and maintained in that use thereafter.Reason: In the interests of road safety and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

14. Before any development takes place detailed plans for the provision of a lay-by in Waites Lane shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and the development

7

Page 8: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

shall be undertaken in accordance with the approved details before the occupation of any dwelling on the site.Reason: In the interest of highway and pedestrian safety and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

15. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking or re-enacting this Order) no caravan, building, structure or erection of any kind (including walls, fences and other means of enclosure) shall be placed within 3 metres of the public foul sewer crossing the site.Reason: To safeguard the public foul sewer crossing the site and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

16. The garage accommodation shall be retained for the parking of a motor vehicle and may also be used in connection with the business operated from the office incorporated within the dwelling. The garage shall not be used as habitable domestic accommodation. To enable the Local Planning Authority to regulate and control the development of the land in relation to the amenities of the locality.

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

(Cllr C.R. Maynard wished it to be recorded that he voted against this recommendation.)

MATTERS FOR INFORMATION

PL62. DATE FOR SITE INSPECTIONS – Tuesday 7 December 2004 at 8.30am departing from the Town Hall, Bexhill.

PL63. APPEALS

RESOLVED: That the report be noted.

CHAIRMAN

The meeting closed at 2.50 p.m. pl041104.rac

8

Page 9: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

PLANNING COMMITTEE 4 NOVEMBER 2004 APPENDIX A

RR/2004/2394/P BURWASH LOWER BOUGH FARM, HEATHFIELD ROAD24 AUG 2004 ERECTION OF FARRIERS WORKSHOP WITH PROVISION OF

THREE PARKING SPACES AND REVISED ACCESS DRIVEMr and Mrs D Henry

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING)1. CN6A (Use limitation).2. CN12G (Hours of use - 7:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday - Friday; 7:30 a.m. - 1:00

p.m. Saturdays; not Sundays or Bank Holidays).3. No floodlighting or external lighting of the site shall take place until details of

lights and their position have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The permitted lights shall only be installed in accordance with the approved details and they shall not be illuminated outside of the permitted hours of use set out by conditions imposed upon this planning permission.(Reason: RC12).

4. CN13C (Tree retention).5. CN13F (Tree/shrub planting).6. CN10J (Grampian style condition - access details - amended).

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2600/P BURWASH THE BANK BUILDING, HIGH STREET01 SEP 2004 CONSTRUCTION OF TWO STOREY COTTAGE TO REPLACE

THE EXISTING BANK BUILDINGMr and Mrs T Hodge

RR/2004/2602/H BURWASH THE BANK BUILDING, HIGH STREET01 SEP 2004 DEMOLITION OF BANK BUILDING

Mr and Mrs T Hodge

DECISIONS:

RR/2004/2600/P DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION

RR/2004/2502/H: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION

RR/2004/2966/P BURWASH LOWER BOUGH FARM, HEATHFIELD ROAD05 OCT 2004 RETENTION OF MOBILE HOME FOR USE AS RESIDENTIAL

ACCOMMODATION IN LIEU OF THAT APPROVED UNDER CERTIFICATE OF LAWFUL USE RR/2003/2360/O (RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION)Mr and Mrs D Henry

DECISION: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (LEGAL ADVICE RE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT).1. The site lies within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, where

Policies EN1, EN2, EN3, S1(j) and S10 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1(v) of the Rother District Local Plan:

9

Page 10: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

Revised Deposit (November 2003), indicate that development will be carefully controlled to protect the character of the area. It is considered that the proposal does not meet this objective, and it would have a harmful effect on the rural character of the area.

RR/2004/2005/P BATTLE 64 HIGH STREET06 AUG 2004 REVISIONS TO PREVIOUS APPROVAL RR/2003/263/P FOR

EXTRACTOR FLUE/HOUSING FILTERG and J Bush

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

RR/2004/2487/P BATTLE TWO YEWS, NETHERFIELD HILL23 AUG 2004 OUTLINE: ERECTION OF DWELLING

Mr and Mrs D Ackers

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

RR/2004/2613/P BATTLE CLAVERHAM COMMUNITY COLLEGE - LAND AT, 08 SEP 2004 NORTH TRADE ROAD

OUTLINE: ERECTION OF NEW COLLEGE BUILDING AND ALL WEATHER PITCH (WITHOUT FLOODLIGHTING) WITH CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROAD AND PROVISION OF 33 PARKING SPACESLearning Skills Council Sussex

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND TRANSPORT IMPACT ASSESSMENT.

(Cllr Mrs. S.M. Prochak declared a personal interest in this matter in so far as she is a Governor at Robertsbridge Community College, a feeder school for Claverham Community College, and in accordance with the Members’ Code of Conduct remained in the room during consideration thereof.)

RR/2004/2912/P BATTLE NETHERFIELD HILL FARM - LAND ADJ, 29 SEP 2004 NETHERFIELD HILL

OUTLINE: ERECTION OF DETACHED DWELLING WITH PROVISION OF TWO PARKING SPACES AND NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS.Mr G Spooner

DECISION: REFUSE (OUTLINE PLANNING)1. The site is within the countryside outside any town or village as defined in the

Rother District Local Plan (Revised Deposit). Policies S1, S10 and S11 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policies HG10, DS1 and DS4 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003) contain a strong presumption against residential development unless it meets one of the exceptions described in the plans. The proposed dwelling is not required for the needs of agriculture or forestry and it has not been demonstrated

10

Page 11: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

to the Local Planning Authority that it is essential for the running of an enterprise upon which there is clear evidence of a firm intention and ability to develop that has been planned on a sound financial basis. The proposal is therefore considered to be contrary to these policies.

2. The site lies within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, where Policies S1 (j), EN2 and EN3 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 indicate that development will be carefully controlled to protect the character of the area. It is considered that the proposal does not meet this objective, and it would cause harm to the rural character of the area.

3. The proposal would lead to an increased traffic hazard on the C96 (Netherfield Hill) by reason of the inadequate visibility at the proposed access. The proposal is contrary to Policy S1(d) of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1(iii) of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/1503/P BEXHILL 28 COLLINGTON RISE, GREENHAYES27 MAY 2004 ERECTION OF DETACHED DOUBLE GARAGE

Mr and Mrs Dowse

DECISION: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING)1. The new garage would be sited in a visually prominent position in front of the

dwellinghouse, which would be obtrusive and detrimental to the visual amenities of this tree lined street scene. Such development is likely to set an undesirable precedent for similar development in the locality which would be in conflict with the requirements of Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003)

RR/2004/2321/P BEXHILL 154 BARNHORN ROAD, BARNHORN NURSING 02 AUG 2004 HOME

ERECTION OF TWO-STOREY EXTENSION TO EXISTING NURSING HOME WITH REVISED PARKING.London and Country Care Homes

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

RR/2004/2340/P BEXHILL NAZARETH HOUSE, HASTINGS ROAD10 AUG 2004 ALTERATIONS TO CONSENT GRANTED UNDER

APPLICATION NO. RR/2003/2002/P COMPRISING ALTERATIONS TO CONVERSION SCHEME FOR MAIN BUILDING COURTYARD AND WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS AND CHAPEL; AND CHANGE OF USE OF CHAPEL FOR USE AS PRIVATE MEMBERS FITNESS AND LEISURE FACILITY.Hastings Road Development Ltd

See Minute no PL61 (1)

11

Page 12: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

RR/2004/2364/P BEXHILL 47-59 SACKVILLE ROAD AND 1-3 MARINA02 AUG 2004 REDEVELOPMENT OF SITE WITH 24 FLATS, TWO SHOPS

WITH ALTERATION TO EXISTING ACCESS AND PROVISION OF 24 PARKING SPACES.Mr H Khan

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (FURTHER CONSULTATION WITH HIGHWAY AUTHORITY / AMENDMENT OF DESCRIPTION. – TWO RESTAURANTS)1. CN7G (Schedule of materials including colours - amended to relate to building).2. CN10A (Highway conditions).3. CN12L (External lighting).4. CN8C (Foul and surface water drainage).5. Prior to the commencement of development details of the following shall be

submitted to and be subject to the approval of the Local Planning Authority and the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details:i) 1:10 scale drawings of sample sections through front elevation indicating

proposed construction details of brise soleil, balconies, windows, doors, profile of walling and expression of structural elements.

ii) 1:20 scale plans and elevations of all proosed areas of hardstanding, walls, including handrailing, steps, ramps, raised external seating and planting beds

iii) 1:20 scale elevational drawings of proposed shopfront to ground floor premises

iv) hours of operation of the two restaurantsv) details of fume extraction system and soundproofing in relation to the

restaurantvi) facilities for collection and short term storage of waste

6. Prior to being discharged into any watercourse, surface water sewer or soakaway system, all surface water drainage from parking areas, roads and hardstandings shall be passed through trapped gullies to BS5911:1982, with an overall capacity compatible with the site being drained.Clean, uncontaminated rock, subsoil, brick rubble, crushed concrete and ceramic only shall be permitted as infill materials.Reason: To prevent pollution of controlled waters.

7. If during development, any visibly contaminated or odorous material not previously identified is found to be present at the site, must be investigated. The Planning Authority must be informed immediately of the nature and degree of contamination present. The developer shall submit a Method Statement which must detail how this unsuspected contamination shall be dealt with.Reason: To ensure that the development complies with approved details in the interests of protection of Controlled Waters.

8. Prior to the occupation of the development details of localised improvements to pedestrian movements in Marina/Sackville Road shall be submitted to and be subject to the approval of the Local Planning Authority. The approved works shall be carried out within six months of the first occupation of the flats.

RFG: The proposed development is considered to b a positive step in regeneration of the town centre in accordance with policy BX1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003). The design of the proposed development has been developed in conjunction with English Heritage to ensure that the impact on the Town Centre Conservation Area and the setting of the De la Warr Pavilion is satisfactory. The proposal accords with policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure

12

Page 13: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2635/P BEXHILL KITES NEST WALK - LAND NORTH OF, 13 SEP 2004 BARNHORN ROAD, LITTLE COMMON

TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATION COMPRISING OF A 17.5M HIGH SLIMLINE LATTICE MAST WITH 3 NO. DUAL BAND DUAL POLAR ANTENNAS AND 2 NO. 600MM TRANSMISSION DISHES WITH 6 NO. EQUIPMENT CABINETS HOUSED IN AS FENCED COMPOUND MEASURING 6M X 6M.Orange Personal Communications Services Limited

DECISION: DEFERRED TO INVESTIGATE ALTERNATIVE MAST SHARING OPTIONS.

RR/2004/2744/P BEXHILL 3 SUTHERLAND AVENUE10 SEP 2004 OUTLINE: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING PROPERTY AND

ERECTION OF 6 TWO BEDROOM FLATS TOGETHER WITH PARKING FACILITIES AND ALTERATION TO EXISTING ACCESS AND FORMATION OF A NEW PEDESTRIAN ACCESS.Silvero Investments Ltd

DECISION: GRANT (OUTLINE PLANNING) 1. No trees shall be wilfully damaged or destroyed or uprooted, felled, lopped or

topped without the previous written consent of the Local Planning Authority within 5 years of the completion of the permitted development. Any trees removed without such consent or dying or being severely damaged or becoming seriously diseased before the end of that period shall be replaced with trees of such size and species as may be agreed with the Local Planning Authority.Reason: To maintain the characteristics of the locality and to accord with Policies S1, S5 and S6 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991 - 2011. - URBAN

2. Prior to being discharged into any watercourse, surface water sewer or soakaway system, all surface water drainage from parking areas and hardstandings shall be passed through trapped gullies to BS 5911:1982 with an overall capacity compatible with the site being drained.Reason: To prevent pollution of the water environment and S1.

3. Clean, uncontaminated rock, subsoil, brick rubble, crushed concrete and ceramic only shall be permitted as infill material.Reason: To prevent pollution of controlled waters and S1.”

4. CN7B (External materials).5. CN9I (Boundary treatment).6. CN13F (Tree and shrub planting).7. All existing trees on site, which are to be retained, shall be fenced off as

recommended in BS5837, 'Trees in Relation to Construction', during the course of building works.Reason: To prevent damage to existing trees and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

8. The existing shrubs and leyandii trees along the western boundary of this shall be retained and maintained at a height of not less than 5m from ground level or as otherwise may be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority, and in

13

Page 14: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

the event of the shrubs and/or leyandii becoming seriously damaged, diseased, and/or dying, it/they shall be replaced with shrubs and/or leyandii, or other planting of such size and species as may be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority, within six months of any such damage to the shrubs and/or leyandii or the first signs of any disease, or the shrubs and/or leyandii being removed as a result of such, or other such time period as may be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.Reason: To maintain as far as possible the appearance of the locality and to maintain a natural screen from the presence of the building and to maintain the privacy of neighbouring residents and to accord with the requirements of policy S1, of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991 – 2011, and policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

9. The flats hereby approved shall not be used or occupied until a new 2.0m high solid timber fence has been constructed along the western boundary with number 24 Terminus Avenue in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority including measures for preventing damage to the existing shrubs and leylandii trees which are required to be retained in accordance with condition 8. above. Reason: To preserve the residential amenities and privacy of the occupiers of 24 Terminus Avenue and to accord with policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003)

Note: The applicant’s attention is drawn to the comments of the Environment Agency in their letter attached.

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2820/P BEXHILL 11 GLYNE DRIVE22 SEP 2004 DEMOLITION OF EXISTING ATTACHED GARAGE AND

ERECTION OF NEW LARGER ATTACHED GARAGEMiss S Grisbrook

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING)1. CN7C (Matching external materials).N8B (Building constructed to site boundary)

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2833/P BEXHILL 32-34 COLLINGTON AVENUE, CONQUEST HOUSE06 AUG 2004 CHANGE OF USE FROM D1 (EDUCATIONAL) TO B1

(COMMERCIAL) 3RD, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS AND PART 2ND.Hastings Insurance Services

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

14

Page 15: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

RR/2004/2907/P BEXHILL GRAND HOTEL - SITE OF, SEA ROAD29 SEP 2004 ERECTION OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE FACILITIES WITH

PHARMACY AND 30 SHELTERED APARTMENTS (CATEGORY II) WITH GUEST SUITE AND COMMUNAL FACILITIES TOGETHER WITH LOWER GROUND FLOOR PARKING INCLUDING FORMATION OF NEW VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESSESGeneral Practice Investments Ltd

DECISION: DEFERRED AT APPLICANT’S REQUEST.

(Cllr B. Kentfield declared a personal and prejudicial interest in this matter in so far as he is the freeholder of 24-28 Sea Road which is opposite the site and in accordance with the Members’ Code of Conduct left the room during consideration thereof.)

RR/2004/2920/P BEXHILL 22 HASLAM CRESCENT01 OCT 2004 VARIATION OF CONDITION 3 IMPOSED ON RR/2004/1947/P

TO ALTER THE OPERATING HOURS TO 1100-2200 HOURS INSTEAD OF 0800-2000 HOURS.A Walia

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (CLARIFICATION OF OPENING HOURS ON SUNDAYS AND BANK HOLIDAYS).1. The use hereby permitted shall not be open to customers or any persons and no

employee including a proprietor shall carry out any food preparation, cooking, and/or sales or serving to customers or any persons on the premises outside the hours of 0800 to 2200 Mondays to Saturdays and at no time on Sundays and Bank Holidays, and all clearing, cleaning, and any other work associated with the approved use shall not continue and no employee including a proprietor or other persons shall be in the premises to carry out such work outside the hours of 0800 to 2230 Mondays to Saturdays and at no time on Sundays and Bank Holidays.Reason: In order to preserve the residential amenities of the area and to accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2949/P BEXHILL 90-92 COODEN SEA ROAD, LITTLE COMMON01 OCT 2004 DEMOLITION OF ONE DWELLING AND TWO FLATS AND

ERECTION OF TWO STOREY BLOCK COMPRISING SIX FLATS WITH PROVISION OF SIX PARKING SPACES AND NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS AND ALTERATION TO AN EXISTING ACCESS.Havenscroft Limited

DECISION: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (EXPIRY CONSULTATION PERIOD)

1. Having regard to the siting, design, scale and size of the building, it would cause overlooking and loss of privacy to, and would have an over dominant impact on neighbouring residential amenities; such development would be in conflict with

15

Page 16: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

policy ST1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2973/P BEXHILL BEXHILL 6TH FORM COLLEGE, PENLAND ROAD6 OCT 2004 REVISED LEVELS OF SOUTHERN END OF SITE

(RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION). ERECTION OF ABSORPTIVE ACOUSTIC FENCINGBexhill 6th Form College

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (AMENDED PLANS)1. CN13A (Landscaping scheme)2. CN13B (Implementation of landscaping scheme)3. Details of the design and colour of the acoustic fence in terms of construction

and materials specification shall be provided by the approved contractor. No development shall commence until the construction specification of the acoustic fence is approved by the Local Planning Authority and the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and thereafter maintained.

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/3057/P BEXHILL TESCO STORE, RAVENSIDE RETAIL & LEISURE 13 OCT 2004 PARK, DE LA WARR ROAD

REMOVAL OF CONDITION 3 IMPOSED ON RR/2001/2156/P (ALLOWED ON APPEAL) TO ALLOW COMMENCEMENT OF TRADING OF ADDITIONAL SALES AREA IN EXTENDED STORE BEFORE THE COMPLETION OF HIGHWAY WORKSTesco Stores Ltd

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (HIGHWAY VIEWS)1. The new floor space hereby permitted shall not continue trading after … unless

the highway works shown on Pinnacle Transportation Ltd Fig No. RL9 and RL10 have been completed.

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/3081/P BEXHILL 163 BARNHORN ROAD, ASHRIDGE COURT, 12 OCT 2004 LITTLE COMMON

ERECTION OF NEW RESIDENTIAL WING TO EAST SIDE OF SITE IN TWO PHASES PLUS FITOUT OF WEST WING ROOF SPACE AS ACCOMMODATION WITH ASSOCIATED STAIRCASES AND ALTERATION TO EXISTING ACCESS.Mr and Mrs Van Eugen

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

16

Page 17: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

RR/2004/650/P BECKLEY SIX ACRES, STODDARDS LANE08 MAR 2004 ERECTION OF DOG KENNELS

Mr and Mrs B Baker

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR COMMENTS OF HEAD OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.

RR/2004/2632/P BECKLEY GREAT KNELLE FARM10 SEP 2004 REVISED SCHEME FOR CHANGE OF USE OF GREAT BARN

TO PROVIDE SIX BED SITTING ROOM UNITS WITH RECEPTION/RECREATIONAL/DINING FACILITIES. CONVERSION OF SINGLE STOREY EAST WING TO THREE STAFF UNITS OR SELF CATERING ACCOMMODATION AND SINGLE STOREY WEST SING TO EDUCATIONAL/RECREATIONAL FACILITIESFarm World

RR/2004/2716/L BECKLEY GREAT KNELLE FARM10 SEP 2004 REVISED SCHEME FOR CHANGE OF USE OF GREAT BARN

TO PROVIDE SIX BED SITTING ROOM UNITS WITH RECEPTION/RECREATIONAL/DINING FACILITIES. CONVERSION OF SINGLE STOREY EAST WING TO THREE STAFF UNITS OR SELF CATERING ACCOMMODATION AND SINGLE STOREY WEST SING TO EDUCATIONAL/RECREATIONAL FACILITIESFarm World

DECISIONS: RR/2004/2632/P: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING)1. RN8K Amended ‘The proposed development would be out of character with the

curtilage listed building or its setting …. its setting.2. Policy S10 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011

indicates that in the countryside conversions and/or changes of use of existing buildings for employment recreation, tourist accommodation and facilities, and institutional uses will be supported provided:-i) their form bulk and general design are in keeping with their surroundings;

andii) the use is appropriate to the area in terms of scale, type and impact on its

surroundings.It is considered that the development does not accord with this policy in that the general design is not in keeping with the surroundings and it has not been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that the use is appropriate in terms of scale, type and impact on its surroundings.

RR/2004/2716/L: REFUSE (LISTED BUILDING CONSENT)1. RN8K Amended ‘The proposed development would be out of character with the

curtilage listed building or its setting …. its setting.

17

Page 18: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

RR/2004/2718/P BECKLEY COURT LODGE COTTAGE - LAND AT, MAIN 13 SEP 2004 STREET

OUTLINE: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING COTTAGE AND OUTBUILDING. ERECTION OF THREE DWELLINGS SERVED VIA NEW ACCESS ROADMr P Southcott

DECISION: REFUSE (OUTLINE PLANNING)1. Whilst the site is within a development boundary as defined in the Rother District

Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003) it is considered that the proposal conflicts with Policy GD1 of the Plan in that the scale form and character of the development would not be compatible with the adjacent surrounding area. In particular the development would detract from the character and appearance of the locality and would be out of keeping with and unreasonably harm the amenities of adjoining properties.

2. The site lies within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty where Policies S1(J), EN2 and EN3 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 indicate that development will be carefully controlled to protect the character of the area. It is considered that the proposal does not meet this objective and it would cause harm to the rural character of the area.

3. The proposed development, if permitted would be likely to encourage similar proposals in the vicinity and would be contrary to Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

RR/2004/2887/P BECKLEY HOP BARN FARM - THE BARN AND CATTLE 27 SEP 2004 SHED, PEASMARSH ROAD

CHANGE OF USE AND CONVERSION TO FORM DWELLINGMr M D Sturmer

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

RR/2004/1163/P NORTHIAM COMMONS WOOD FARM, HASTINGS ROAD27 APR 2004 REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNIT WITH A

NEW DWELLINGMrs A Lee

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING)1. CN7b (External materials – a) roofing tiles, b) wall cladding).2. CN5A (Exclude GDO specified structures).3. CN13C (Tree retention).N1A (Amended Plan - 25/10/04).

RR/2004/2560/L NORTHIAM THE WILDERNESS, MAIN STREET27 AUG 2004 DEMOLITION OF PART AND REDUCTION IN HEIGHT OF

STONE BOUNDARY WALLWestridge Surveying Services

DECISION: GRANT (LISTED BUILDING CONSENT)1. Within 2 months of the date of this consent details of the finished section

boundary wall shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning

18

Page 19: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

Authority. The wall shall be completed in accordance with the approved details before the new dwellings are first occupied and shall be so maintained thereafter.Reason: To accord with the provisions of Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

2. CN10A (Highway Authority highway conditions).

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2875/O NORTHIAM DIAL COTTAGE - LAND TO REAR OF28 SEP 2004 LAWFUL USE OF LAND AS RESIDENTIAL CURTILAGE

Mr J C and Mrs J H Beckley

RR/2004/2877/O NORTHIAM WISHING TREE COTTAGE - LAND TO REAR28 SEP 2004 OF, MILL CORNER

LAWFUL USE OF LAND AS RESIDENTIAL CURTILAGEMr W J Waldie

DECISIONS:RR/2004/2875/O: REFUSE (CERTIFICATE OF LAWFUL USE) for the following reason:1. It has not been demonstrated that a material change of use of the land began

more than 10 years before the date of this application and has continued for more than 10 years immediately preceding the date of this application.

RR/2004/2877/O: REFUSE (CERTIFICATE OF LAWFUL USE) for the following reason:1. It has not been demonstrated that a material change of use of the land began

more than 10 years before the date of this application and has continued for more than 10 years immediately preceding the date of this application.

RR/2003/3217/P BODIAM NORTHLANDS FARM07 OCT 2004 RENEWAL OF RR/2002/360/P TO RETAIN WOODEN

STRUCTURE USED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSESMrs Carr and Mrs S McCormick

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR FURTHER LEGAL ADVICE.

RR/2004/2747/P SALEHURST/ROBERTSBRIDGE ASHRIDGE - LAND 15 SEP 2004 ADJACENT TO, GEORGE HILL, ROBERTSBRIDGE

OUTLINE: ERECTION OF DETACHED DWELLING HOUSE WITH PROVISION OF NEW VEHICULAR ACCESSMr G Wells

DECISION: GRANT (OUTLINE PLANNING) 1. The detailed application shall provide information on site ground levels and shall

demonstrate that the finished floor level of the dwelling and the ridge height would result in a dwelling that is in keeping with the street scene and does not dominate neighbouring dwellings.

19

Page 20: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

N1B Originally submitted plan and amended plan dated 24 September 2004.

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2530/P SALEHURST HIGH STREET – LAND TO REAR OF, 16 AUG 2004 ROBERTSBRIDGE

ERECTION OF GARAGE, FORMATION OF HARDSURFACING AND USE OF LAND FOR PARKING/STORAGE OF CARS AND HORSE TRAILER (RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION) AND PROPOSED ERECTION OF TWO STABLESMr & Mrs Julian Palfrey

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

RR/2004/2695/P SALEHURST/ROBERTSBRIDGE 1 BLENHEIM COURT, 7 SEPT 2004 CHESTNUT COTTAGE, GEORGE HILL

RETENTION OF REAR EXTENSION FAIR FACEDBLOCKWALL FACING NEIGHBOURS WALL IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITION 2 IMPOSED UPON PLANNING PERMISSION RR/2003/3499/PMr & Mrs J F Stevens

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (RECONSULTATIONS WITH OCCUPIER OF THE NEIGHBOURING PROPERTY ON AMENDED DRAWING AND AMENDED APPLICATION DESCRIPTION).1. Within (X) month(s) from the date of this permission the works shall be carried out

in full and in accordance with the details shown on the amended plan. The new brickwork shall match in colour and texture that of the existing dwelling.

N1B Original site location plan and amended plan (drawing no. 2346/1/A).

RR/2004/2865/P WESTFIELD GOTWAYS FARM, KENT STREET09 JUL 2004 CHANGE OF USE AND CONVERSION OF BARN AND

STABLES TO A SINGLE DWELLING WITH OFFICE AND DOUBLE GARAGE/WORKSHOP WITH FORMATION OF A NEW VEHICULAR ACCESSSedlescombe Golf Club Management Ltd

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

RR/2004/2377/P WESTFIELD 35 BALDSLOW DOWN, TANGLEWOOD12 AUG 2004 ERECTION OF SINGLE STOREY SIDE AND REAR

EXTENSION TO EXISTING TWO STOREY HOUSEMr Dave Betti

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING)1. CN7C (Matching external materials).2. CN 5D Insert “The windows and door in the north elevation ….”. (Obscure

20

Page 21: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

glaze windows).3. CN5E (a) Amended “no windows except as shown on the approved plans shall be inserted into the north side of the extensions”. (Restriction of alterations/additions).N1A (Amended plans).

RR/2004/1463/P WESTFIELD DOLEHAM LANE – LAND OFF25 MAY 2004 INSTALLATION OF 15M PHASE 1.5 MONOPOLE WITH

THREE ANTENNAS, TWO 300MM DISHES AND RADIO EQUIPMENT HOUSINGVodafone Limited

DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING)1. The antennae and all equipment hereby permitted on the site shall be removed

from the land on which it is situated within 6 months of the time when it is no longer required for telecommunication purposes. Reason: To enable the Local Planning authority to regulate and control the development of the land in accordance with government Advice in Planning Policy Guidance Note 8 and Policy EN30 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

2. This planning permission does not authorise any interference with animals, birds, marine life, plants, fauna and habitats in contravention of the requirements of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and other legislation. Further advice on the requirements of this Act is available from English Nature, Sussex and Surrey Team, Phoenix House, 32-33 North Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 2PH.Reason: To accord with Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

Note: The applicant is advised that this is likely to be the only Personal Communications Network Base Station permitted in this area and that in accordance with Government Advice in Planning Policy Guidance Note 8, the Local Planning Authority will expect the mast to be available for sharing with other code system operators should the need arise.

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2356/P ICKLESHAM ROBIN HOOD PUBLIC HOUSE - LAND NEXT 29 SEP 2004 TO, MAIN ROAD

OUTLINE: ERECTION OF 3 BUNGALOWS (DISABLED), 2 BUNGALOWS (LOW COST), 4 HOUSES, 2 HOUSES (LOW COST), SHOP WITH POST OFFICE AND LIVING ACCOMMODATION, DOCTORS SURGERY, FORMATION OF NEW ACCESSES, ROADS, FOOTPATHS, PELICAN CROSSING AND EXTEND LAY-BYRobin Hood Public House

DECISION: REFUSE (OUTLINE PLANNING) DELEGATED (FOR RECEIPT OF COMMENTS FROM OUTSTANDING CONSULTEES)1. The site is within the countryside outside any town or village as defined in the

Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003). Policies S1, S10 and H5 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and DS3, DS4 and HG10 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit

21

Page 22: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

(November 2003) contain a strong presumption against residential development in the countryside unless it meets one of the exceptions described in the plans. None of these apply and the development is contrary to these policies.

2. In exceptional circumstances, planning permission may be granted for residential development outside development boundaries in order to meet a local housing need among those people unable to compete in the normal housing market. Proposals for development will be considered in the context of several criteria. The proposal does not meet those criteria, and therefore the development conflicts with Policies HG2 and HG10 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

3. The proposed shop with post office and doctors’ surgery would be contrary to Policies S1 and S10 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policies DS3 and DS4 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003). They would also not meet the additional criteria for permitting such facilities outside development boundaries contained in Policy CF1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

4. The site lies within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, where Policies S1(j), EN2 and EN3 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011, Policy GD1(v) of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003) and Government Advice contained in PPS7: Sustainable Development in Rural Areas indicate that development will be carefully controlled to protect the character of the area. It is considered that the proposal does not meet this objective, and it would cause harm to the rural character of the area.

5. It has not been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority, in conjunction with the Highways Agency, that visibility at the proposed access point/s onto the A259 Trunk Road would be adequate to serve the development proposed. Furthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For these reasons the proposal would be contrary to Policy S1(d) of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2780/P ICKLESHAM THE WILLOWS, SEA ROAD27 SEP 2004 OUTLINE: ERECTION OF TWO SEMI-DETACHED HOUSES

WITH FORMATION OF NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS. RESITING OF DWELLING APPROVED UNDER RR/2003/731/PMr M Bull

DECISION: REFUSE (OUTLINE PLANNING) DELEGATED (RECEIPT OF ENVIRONMENT AGENCY COMMENTS)1. Whilst the site lies within an existing village, it is considered that the proposed

conflicts with S8 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 in that it would be out of character with existing development in the vicinity.

2. Whilst the site is within a development boundary as defined in the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003), it is considered the proposal conflicts with Policy GD1(4), by virtue of its position within the site.

3. (Possible Environment Agency reason).  

22

Page 23: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

RR/2004/2832/P ETCHINGHAM SHORTRIDGE FARM, SHEEPSTREET LANE11 OCT 2004 CHANGE OF USE AND CONVERSION OF COURTYARD

BARN TO PROVIDE HOLIDAY LETTING UNITS WITH AN UPGRADED ACCESS ROAD ALTERATION TO EXISTING ACCESSMrs F J Farrington

DECISION: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (EXPIRY OF CONSULTATION PERIOD)1. The application site is not adjacent or closely related to a village or settlement,

and the proposed use is not consistent with planning policies, which seek to promote sustainable development. The development proposal is not consistent with Government Planning Policies in PPS 7 and Policy LT 2 (c) of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

2. The scale of the use and the associated operational development would hava a significant detrimental impact on the rural area including traffic generation, and harm to the character and appearance of the designated High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The development conflicts with Policies S1 (d) (j), S10 (b) (ii), S11 (a) (c) (d), EN1, EN2, EN3 and LT1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011.

3. The design details of the conversion are domestic in character, and the proposal does not conserve the agriculture character and appearance of the building.

4. The proposal would lead to increased traffic hazards on the C213 (Sheepstreet Lane) by reason of the inadequate visibility at the proposed access. The development is contrary to Policy S1 (d) of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1(iii) of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2781/P TICEHURST TICEHURST PRIMARY SCHOOL, CHURCH 17 SEP 2004 STREET

FURTHER TO APPLICATION RR/2002/2349/P, REVISED SCHEME FOR CONVERSION OF FORMER SCHOOL BUILDING INCREASED FROM 6 TO 10 DWELLINGSDaniel Homes Ltd

RR/2004/2782/L TICEHURST TICEHURST PRIMARY SCHOOL, CHURCH17 SEP 2004 STREET

FURTHER TO APPLICATION RR/2002/2349/P, REVISED SCHEME FOR CONVERSION OF FORMER SCHOOL BUILDING INCREASED FROM 6 TO 10 DWELLINGSDaniel Homes Ltd

DECISIONS:RR/2004/2781/P: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING)

1. The proposed development would result in an over development of the site by virtue of the increased number of dwellings and additional car parking on the site which would be out of character with and detrimental to the listed building and its setting and would be contrary to Policy S1(m) of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and GD1(viii) of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

23

Page 24: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

2. The proposed subdivision and alteration of the school building to provide four additional dwellings would have an adverse impact on the architectural and historic character of the listed building and its setting by virtue of

a) removal of chimney stacks at ground floor level – units 15,18 and 20b) omission of the mezzanine level recess around double height windowsc) subdivision within main windows and additional roof lights in units 12,13

and 14d) removal of the existing staircase in unit 17e) subdivision of open space to provide private gardens

The proposal would be contrary to Policy S1(m) of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011. and GD1(viii) of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003)

3. The proposed development does not provide satisfactory car parking for the site and is likely to result in overflow of car parking for residents and visitors on Church Street which would result in traffic hazard to users of Church Street. The proposal would be contrary to Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2782/L: REFUSE (LISTED BUILDING)1. The proposed subdivision and alteration of the school building to provide four

additional dwellings would have an adverse impact on the architectural and historic character of the listed building and its setting by virtue of

a) removal of chimney stacks at ground floor level – units 15,18 and 20b) omission of the mezzanine level recess around double height windowsc) subdivision within main windows and additional roof lights in units 12,13

and 14d) removal of the existing staircase in unit 17e) subdivision of open space to provide private gardens

The proposal would be contrary to Policy S1(m) of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011. and GD1(viii) of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003)

RR/2004/2766/P SEDLESCOMBE STRAWBERRY HILL FARM, 16 SEP 2004 POPPINGHOLE LANE

REVISED PLANS FOR CHANGE OF USE AND CONVERSION OF BARN TO FORM A SINGLE DWELLING WITH ERECTION OF ANCILLARY BUILDINGS AND TRIPLE GARAGEMr R T Caine

RR/2004/2768/L SEDLESCOMBE STRAWBERRY HILL FARM, 16 SEP 2004 POPPINGHOLE LANE, ROBERTSBRIDGE

REVISED PLANS FOR CONVERSION OF BARN TO FORM A SINGLE DWELLING WITH ERECTION OF ANCILLARY BUILDINGS AND TRIPLE GARAGEMr R T Caine

DECISIONS:RR/2004/2766/P: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING)1. The site lies within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, where

Policies EN1, EN2 and EN3 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1(v) of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised

24

Page 25: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

Deposit (November 2003) indicate that development will be carefully controlled to protect the character of the area. It is considered that the proposal does not meet this objective, and it would have a harmful effect on the rural character of the area.

OR

RR/2004/2766/P: GRANT (FULL PLANNING) DELEGATED (DELETION OF SWIMMING POOL BUILDING FROM APPLICATION).1. CN4B (Details of doors and windows).2. CN5E (Restrict alterations and addition).N1A Amended Plans.

RR/2004/2768/L: GRANT (LISTED BUILDING CONSENT)1. CN4B (Details of doors and windows).2. CN5E (Restrict alterations and additions).

RR/2004/1701/P FAIRLIGHT FAIRLIGHT GARAGE, BATTERY HILL23 JUN 2004 REVISED PROPOSALS RELATING TO AMENDED SITE

LAYOUT AND DESIGN FOR THE ERECTION OF FOUR DETACHED DWELLINGSGem Select Ltd

See Minute no PL61 (2)

RR/2004/2495/P FAIRLIGHT MEADOW SWEET, GORSETHORN WAY23 AUG 2004 RAISING OF ROOF, INSERTION OF DORMER WINDOWS,

SINGLE STOREY EXTENSIONS AND REPLACEMENT SINGLE GARAGEMrs L S Rokhsar

   DECISION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING) 1. CN7C (Matching external materials).2. CN5E (a) windows (Restriction of alterations/additions)3. CN9I (extensions) (Walling/fencing - Non estate development)

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003). 

RR/2004/1494/P GUESTLING BRIDGE YARD, ROCK LANE13 MAY 2004 ADDITIONAL USAGE FOR THE STORAGE OF TOURING

CARAVANSMr K A Bartlett

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

25

Page 26: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

RR/2004/1514/P PETT THE TWO SAWYERS PUBLIC HOUSE -YARD AND 22 APR 2004 ACCESS WAYS, PETT ROAD, PETT

OUTLINE: ERECTION OF 5 TERRACED COTTAGES AND ONE HOUSE WITH GARAGE, FORMATION OF NEW ACCESS WAY OVER BEER GARDEN OF PUB

Mr C Soper

DECISION: GRANT (OUTLINE PLANNING) DELEGATED (AMENDED ACCESS PLAN IN RELATION TO BEER GARDEN)1. CN9A (Road Construction Details).2. CN9B (Tree Retention).3. CN13A (Landscaping scheme).4. CN13B (Implementation of Landscaping Scheme)5. CN9I (Walls/fences)6. CN8C (Foul and surface water)7. Prior to commencement of development details of all hardstandings, parking and

hard surface areas shall be submitted to and be subject to the approval of the Local Planning Authority and the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

8. CN12L (External lighting)9. CN8K (Floor levels)10. Contaminated land conditions.11. Prior construction of rear access road.12. The proposed new access and car parking shall be constructed and be available

for use prior to the commencement of development on the approved new dwellings.

N1A Amended Plans

RFG: Policy S1 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and Policy GD1 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

RR/2004/2802/P PETT ASHLEIGH – LAND ADJACENT21 SEP 2004 OUTLINE: ERECTION OF DETACHED DWELLING TO INCLUDE

ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING ACCESS AND FORMATION OF A NEW VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS.Mr S Catt

DECISION: REFUSE (FULL PLANNING) 1. Part of the site is within the countryside outside any town or village as defined in

the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003). Policies S1, S10 and S11 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 contains a strong presumption against residential development unless it meets one of the exceptions described in the Plan. It has not been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed residential development is essential for the needs of an enterprise that must be in a rural location. The proposal is therefore considered to be contrary to those policies.

2. Part of the proposed development site lies outside of the Development Boundary for the village of Pett as defined within the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003). No compelling justification for such a location has been demonstrated, the proposal is therefore considered to be contrary to Policy HG10 of the Rother District Local Plan: Revised Deposit (November 2003).

26

Page 27: Xxx - Rother District  · Web viewFurthermore, the proposed access/s and pelican crossing would need to be subject to a safety audit before they could be properly considered. For

3. The site lies within the High Weald High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, where Policies EN1, EN2 and EN3 of the East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Structure Plan 1991-2011 and government advice in PPS7 indicate that development will be carefully controlled to protect the character of the area. It is considered that the proposal does not meet this objective and it would have a harmful effect on the rural character of the area.

4. The approach road Pannel Lane (UC6418) is unsuitable to serve the proposed development by reason of its narrow width, poor alignment and lack of footways.

RR/2004/2191/P RYE 113 WINCHELSEA ROAD AND WESTERN BARN - 28 JUL 2004 LAND REAR OF, WINCHELSEA ROAD

DEMOLITION OF WESTERN BARN. ERECTION OF ELEVEN DETACHED AND SEMI-DETACHED HOUSES, FORMATION OF NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS. PROVISION OF CAR PARKING AREA FOR ‘THE WOOLSTORE’, NEW BRICK WALLS, FENCES AND GATES TO WESTERN HOUSESvela Developments Ltd

RR/2004/2274/L RYE 113 WINCHELSEA ROAD AND WESTERN BARN - 24 AUG 2004 LAND

REAR OF, WINCHELSEA ROADDEMOLITION OF BUILDINGSvela Developments Ltd

DECISIONS:RR/2004/2191/P: DEFERRED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RR/2004/2274/L: DEFERRED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

RR/2004/2631/P RYE 1 MILL ROAD02 SEP 2004 REVISED PROPOSALS FOR THE ERECTION OF A TWO

STOREY EXTENSION TO PROVIDE GARAGE AND LOUNGE WITH TWO BEDROOMS ABOVE AND SINGLE STOREY EXTENSION TO FORM DINING ROOMMr & Mrs Lindow Browne

DECISION: DEFERRED FOR SITE INSPECTION.

-o0o-

27