Upload
nur-hidayatul-nadhirah
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/20/2019 XRD notes
1/51
X-RAY DIFFRACTIONX-RAY DIFFRACTION
X- Ray Sources
Diffraction: Bragg’s La
Crysta! Structure Deter"ination
Elements of X-Ray Diffraction
B#D# Cu!!ity $ S#R# Stoc% &rentice 'a!!( )**er Sa++!e Ri,er .//01
Recommended websites: 2tt*:33#"atter#org#u%3+iffraction3
2tt*:33#ngsir#netfir"s#co"3eng!is22t"3Diffraction#2t"
4AT5RIALS SCI5NC54AT5RIALS SCI5NC5$$
5N6IN55RIN65N6IN55RIN6
Anandh Subramaniam & Kantesh Balani
4ateria!s Science an+ 5ngineering 4S51
In+ian Institute of Tec2no!ogy( 7an*ur- ./8/09
Email: [email protected], URL: home.iitk.ac.in/anandh
AN INTROD)CTORY 5-BOO7 AN INTROD)CTORY 5-BOO7
!art of
htt"://home.iitk.ac.in/anandh/E-book.htm
A Learner’s GuideA Learner’s Guide
8/20/2019 XRD notes
2/51
'o to *ro+uce "onoc2ro"atic X-rays
'o +oes a crysta! scatter t2ese X-rays to gi,e a +iffraction *attern
→ Bragg’s e;uation out t2e !attice ty*e#$%bic crystal ty"es&.
e *ut to a*art fro" crysta! structure +eter"ination 6rain si=e +eter"ination Strain in t2e "ateria!?
-c2a*ter’
8/20/2019 XRD notes
3/51
For e!ectro"agnetic ra+iation to >e +iffracte+ t2e s*acing in t2e grating aseries of o>stac!es or a series of scatterers1 s2ou!+ >e of t2e sa"e or+er as t2ea,e!engt2#
In crysta!s t2e ty*ica! interato"ic s*acing .- → so t2e suita>!e ra+iationfor t2e +iffraction stu+y of crysta!s is X-rays#
'ence( X-rays are use+ for t2e in,estigation of crysta! structures# Neutrons an+ 5!ectrons are a!so use+ for +iffraction stu+ies fro" "ateria!s# Neutron +iffraction is es*ecia!!y usefu! for stu+ying t2e "agnetic or+ering in
"ateria!s#
So"e Basics
Lattice *ara"eter of Cu aCu1 E #90 ⇒ +2%! is e;ua! to aCu or !ess t2an t2at e#g# +000 E aCu3√ E .#/8 1
If t2e a,e!engt2 is of t2e or+er of t2e !attice s*acing( t2en +iffraction effects i!! >e *ro"inent#C!ic% 2ere to %no "ore a>out t2is
C!ic% 2ere to %no "ore a>out t2is
8/20/2019 XRD notes
4/51
Beam of electrons Target X-rays
An acce!erating or +ece!erating1 c2arge ra+iates e!ectro"agnetic ra+iation
X-rays can >e generate+ >y +ece!erating e!ectrons#
'ence( X-rays are generate+ >y >o">ar+ing a target say Cu1 it2 an e!ectron >ea"#
T2e resu!tant s*ectru" of X-rays generate+ i#e# λX-rays ,ersus Intensity *!ot1 is s2on int2e net s!i+e# T2e *attern s2os intense *ea%s on a @>roa+’ >ac%groun+#
T2e intense *ea%s can >e @t2oug2t of’ as "onoc2ro"atic ra+iation an+ >e use+ for X-ray+iffraction stu+ies#
6eneration of X-rays
8/20/2019 XRD notes
5/51
4o Target i"*acte+ >y e!ectrons acce!erate+ >y a G %H *otentia! s2os t2e e"issions*ectru" as in t2e figure >e!o sc2e"atic1
T2e 2ig2 intensity near!y "onoc2ro"atic 7 α -rays can >e use+ as a ra+iation source for
X-ray +iffraction XRD1 stu+ies a "onoc2ro"ator can >e use+ to furt2er +ecrease t2e
s*rea+ of a,e!engt2s in t2e X-ray
X-ray sources it2 +ifferent λ for
+oing XRD stu+iesTargetMetal
λ
Of K
radiation (Å)
4o /#0
Cu 0#GJ
Co 0#K
Fe 0#KJ
Cr .#.K
8/20/2019 XRD notes
6/51
Elements (KV) λ Of K
1
radiation(Å)
λ Of K
radiation (Å)
λ Of K !
radiation (Å)
K !"#ilter
(mm)
Ag .G#G. /#GGKJ0 /#G98 /#JK/ &+/#/J90
Mo ./ /#/K /#0GK /#9..K r /#/98
$u 8#K8 0#GJ/GK8 0#GJJK 0#K... Ni/#/0
%i 8# 0#9GK0 0#990G 0#G//0J Co/#/0G8
$o #0 0#88K 0#K.8G 0#9./K Fe
/#/099#e #00 0#K9/J 0#KKK8 0#G990 4n
/#/098
$r G#KK .#.8K .#.K90 .#/8J8 H/#09K
$.'ordon Darwin, 'randson of $. Robert Darwin de(elo"ed the dynamic theory of scatterin) of *-rays #a to%)h theory+& in
X-ray sources it2 +ifferent λ for +oing XRD stu+ies
8/20/2019 XRD notes
7/51
A>sor*tion 'eat1
Inci+ent X-rays
S&5CI45N
Trans"itte+ >ea"
F!uorescent X-rays
5!ectrons
Co"*ton recoi! &2otoe!ectronsScattere+ X-rays
Co2erent
rom bo%nd char)es
X-rays can also be refracted #refracti(e inde* sli)htly less than & and reflected #at (ery small an)les&
M
8/20/2019 XRD notes
8/51
No e s2a!! consi+er t2e i"*ortant to*ic as to 2o X-rays interact it2 a
crysta!!ine array of ato"s( ions etc#1 to gi,e rise to t2e *2eno"enon %non as X-
ray +iffraction XRD1# Let us consi+er a s*ecia! case of +iffraction a case 2ere e get @ shar"01
diffraction "eaks2 # Diffraction with shar" "eaks1 it2 XRD >eing a s*ecific case1 re;uires t2ree i"*ortant con+itions to
>e satisfie+:
Ra+iation re!ate+
Co2erent( "onoc2ro"atic( *ara!!e! a,es$
it2 a,e!engt2λ
1#Sa"*!e re!ate+ Crysta!!ine array of scatterers it2 s*acing of t2e or+er of 1 λ#Diffraction geo"etry re!ate+ Fraun2ofer +iffraction geo"etry $ t2is is actua!!y *art of t2e Fraun2ofer geo"etry1
01 3he intensity-θ "lot looks like a 4 δ 2 f%nction #in an ideal sit%ation&.
5 6 7%asicrystalline array will also lead to diffraction with shar" "eaks #which we shall not consider in this te*t&.55 6mor"ho%s material will )i(e broadened #diff%se& "eak #additional factors related to the sam"le can also )i(e a diff%se "eak&.
Diffraction C!ic% 2ere to )n+erstan+ DiffractionP
Co2erent( "onoc2ro"atic( *ara!!e! a,e
Fraun2ofer geo"etry
Diffraction *atternit2 s2ar* *ea%s
Crysta!!ine(
6s"ects related to the wa(e
6s"ects related to the material
6s"ects related to the diffraction set-%"+iffraction geo"etry1
8/20/2019 XRD notes
9/51
T2e a,es cou!+ >e:
e!ectro"agnetic a,es !ig2t( X-rays?1(
"atter a,es e!ectrons( neutrons?1 or "ec2anica! a,es soun+( a,es on ater surface?1# Not a!! o>Qects act !i%e scatterers for a!! %in+s of ra+iation# If a,e!engt2 is not of t2e or+er of t2e s*acing of t2e scatterers( t2en t2e nu">er
of *ea%s o>taine+ "ay >e 2ig2!y restricte+ i#e# e "ay e,en not e,en get a
sing!e +iffraction *ea%1# In s2ort +iffraction is co2erent reinforce+ scattering or reinforce+ scattering of co2erent a,es1# In a sense +iffraction is not2ing >ut a s*ecia! case of constructi,e $ +estructi,e1
interference#To gi,e an ana!ogy → t2e resu!ts of Young’s +ou>!e s!it e*eri"ent is inter*rete+ as interference( 2i!e t2e resu!t of
"u!ti*!e s!its !arge nu">er1 is categori=e+ un+er +iffraction#
Fraun2ofer +iffraction geo"etry i"*!ies t2at *ara!!e! a,es are i"*inging on t2e scatteres
t2e o>Qect1( an+ t2e screen to ca*ture t2e +iffraction *attern1 is *!ace+ far aay fro" t2e
o>Qect#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
10/51
A >ea" of X-rays +irecte+ at a crysta! interacts it2 t2e e!ectrons of t2e ato"s in t2e crysta!# T2e e!ectrons osci!!ate un+er t2e inf!uence of t2e inco"ing X-Rays an+ >eco"e secon+ary sources
of 54 ra+iation#
T2e secon+ary ra+iation is in a!! +irections# T2e a,es e"itte+ >y t2e e!ectrons 2a,e t2e sa"e fre;uency as t2e inco"ing X-rays ⇒ coherent. T2e e"ission can un+ergo constructi,e or +estructi,e interference#
XRD → t2e first ste*
8chematics
8/20/2019 XRD notes
11/51
etter *2ysica! *icture of +iffraction >y using Laue’s for"a!is" !ea+ing to t2e Laue’se;uations1#
'oe,er( a *ara!!e! a**roac2 to +iffraction is ,ia t2e "et2o+ of Bragg( 2erein +iffraction can >e
,isua!i=e+ as @ref!ections’ fro" a set of *!anes# As t2e a**roac2 of Bragg is easier to gras* e s2a!! use t2at in t2is e!e"entary tet#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
12/51
5tra *at2 tra,e!e+ >y inco"ing a,es → AY
A B
X Y
Ato"ic &!anes
5tra *at2 tra,e!e+ >y scattere+ a,es → XB
T2ese can >e in *2ase if → θinci+ent E θscattere+
A B
X Y
But t2is is sti!! reinforce+ scatteringand 93 reflection
Let us consi+er in-*!ane scattering
T2ere is "ore to t2is$lick here to know more and )et
introd%ced to La%e e7%ations describin)diffraction
http://laue_picture.ppt/http://laue_picture.ppt/
8/20/2019 XRD notes
13/51
BRA66’s 5)ATION
A *ortion of t2e crysta! is s2on for c!arity- actua!!y( for destr%cti(e interference to occur
"any *!anes are re;uire+ an+ t2e interaction ,o!u"e of -rays is !arge as co"*are+ to t2at s2on in t2e sc2e"atic1# T2e scattering *!anes 2a,e a s*acing @+’#
Ray-. tra,e!s an etra *at2 as co"*are+ to Ray-0 E ABC1# T2e *at2 +ifference >eteen Ray- an+ Ray- E ABC E + Sinθ + Sinθ1 E .+#Sinθ1# For constructi,e interference( t2is *at2 +ifference s2ou!+ >e an integra! "u!ti*!e of λ:
nλ E .+ Sinθ → t2e Bragg’s e;uation# #;ore abo%t this sooner&. T2e *at2 +ifference >eteen Ray-0 an+ Ray- is E .×.+#Sinθ1 E .×nλ E .nλ# T2is i"*!ies t2at if Ray-0
an+ Ray-. constructi,e!y interfere Ray-0 an+ Ray- i!! a!so constructi,e!y interfere# An+ so fort21#
Let us consi+er scattering across *!anes
C!ic% 2ere to ,isua!i=econstructi,e an+
+estructi,e interference
See Note Ӂ later
8/20/2019 XRD notes
14/51
T2e *re,ious *age e*!aine+ 2o constructi,e interference occurs# 'o a>out t2e rays Qust ofBragg ang!e O>,ious!y t2e *at2 +ifference ou!+ >e Qust off λ as in t2e figure >e!o#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
15/51
Ref!ection ,ersus Diffraction
Ref!ection Diffraction
Occurs fro" surface
Occurs t2roug2out t2e >u!%
#tho%)h often the "enetration of *-rays in only of theorder of s of microns in a material&
Ta%es *!ace at any ang!e Ta%es *!ace on!y at Bragg ang!es
0// U of t2e intensity "ay >e ref!ecte+ S"a!! fraction of intensity is +iffracte+
9ote: X-rays can 6L8 be reflected at (ery small an)les of incidence
T2oug2 +iffraction accor+ing to Bragg’s *icture1 2as >een ,isua!i=e+ as a ref!ection fro" aset of *!anes it2 inter*!anar s*acing @+’→ +iffraction s2ou!+ not >e confuse+ it2ref!ection s*ecu!ar ref!ection1#
&!anes are i"aginary constructs&!anes are i"aginary constructs
Laue ,ersus Bragg
In Laue’s *icture constructi,e an+ +estructi,e interference at ,arious *oints in s*ace isco"*ute+ using *at2 +ifferences an+ 2ence *2ase +ifferences1− gi,en a crysta!!ine array ofscatterers#
Bragg si"*!ifie+ t2is *icture >y consi+ering t2is *rocess as @ref!ections fro" ato"ic *!anes’#
C!ic% 2ere to %no "ore a>out t2e Laue &icture
8/20/2019 XRD notes
16/51
nλ E .+ Sinθ
3he e7%ation is written better with some descri"ti(e s%bscri"ts:
n is an integer an+ is t2e or+er of t2e ref!ection#i.e. how many wa(elen)ths of the X-ray )o on to make the "ath difference between "lanes&.
9ote: if hkl reflection #corres"ondin) to nA& occ%rs at θ hkl then h k l reflection #nA& will occ%r at a hi)her an)le θ h k l .
Bragg’s e;uation is a ne)ati(e state"ent If Bragg’s e;# is NOT satisfie+ → NO @ref!ection’ can occur
If Bragg’s e;# is satisfie+ → @ref!ection’ ;6B occur #ut not t2e interato"ic
s*acing @a’ a!ong t2e *!ane 2ic2 2a+ force+ θinci+ent E θscattere+1V >ut e are notfree to "o,e t2e ato"s a!ong t2e *!ane @ran+o"!y’ → click here to know more.
For !arge inter*!anar s*acing t2e ang!e of ref!ection ten+s toar+s =ero as + increases(
Sinθ +ecreases an+ so +oes θ1#
T2e s"a!!est inter*!anar s*acing fro" 2ic2 Bragg +iffraction can >e o>taine+ is λ3.
"ai"u" ,a!ue of θ is K/°( Sinθ is 0 ⇒ fro" Bragg e;uation + E λ3.#
)n+erstan+ing t2e Bragg’s e;uation
. Sin$% C hkl hkl n d α λ θ = If t2is e;uation is satisfie+( t2en θ is θBragg
Note: Ӂ
http://laue_picture.ppt/http://laue_picture.ppt/
8/20/2019 XRD notes
17/51
For Cu 7 α ra+iation λ E 0#GJ 1 an+ +00/E .#..
n Sinθ E nλ3.+ θ
0 /#J ./#W M First or+er ref!ection fro" 00/1 → 00/
. /#9K J#K.WM Secon+ or+er ref!ection fro" 00/1 *!anes → 00/
M A!so consi+ere+ as first or+er ref!ection fro" ../1 *!anes → ../
. . .
$%bic crystal hkl
ad
h k l
=+ +
8../
ad =
.
00/
ad =
.
0
00/
../ =d
d
Re!ation >eteen +n2 n% n! an+ +2%!
e#g#
. . . 1 1 1nhnknl
ad
nh nk nl =
+ +
. . .
hkl
nhnk nl
d a
d nn h k l = =+ +
Or+er of t2e ref!ection n1
8/20/2019 XRD notes
18/51
. sinhkl hkl n d λ θ =
In XRD nt2 or+er ref!ection fro" 2 % !1 is considered as 0st or+er ref!ection fro" n2 n% n!1
θ λ sin.n
d hkl
=
n n n n n n. sinh k l h k l d λ θ =
0nh nk nl
hkl
d
d n=
//
0//
0
d
d =
.//
0//
0
.
d
d =
ic crysta!( 0//( .//( //? are a!! a!!oe+ @ref!ections’# But( t2ere are no ato"s in t2e
*!anes !ying within t2e unit ce!! T2oug2( first or+er ref!ection fro" .// *!anes is e;ui,a!ent"at2e"atica!!y1 to t2e secon+ or+er ref!ection fro" 0// *!anesV for ,isua!i=ation *ur*oses ofscattering( t2is is >etter t2oug2t of as t2e !ater *rocess i#e# secon+ or+er ref!ection fro" 0//1 *!anes1#
Note:Tec2nica!!y( in 4i!!er in+ices e factor out t2e co""on factors# 'ence( ../1 ≡ .00/1 ≡ 00/1#In XRD e eten+ t2e usua! conce*t of 4i!!er in+ices to inc!u+e *!anes( 2ic2 +o not *ass t2roug2!attice *oints e#g# e,ery a!ternate *!ane >e!onging to t2e //.1 set +oes not *ass t2roug2 !attice *oints1
an+ e a!!o t2e co""on factors to re"ain in t2e in+ices#
A!! t2ese for" t2e .//1 set
8/20/2019 XRD notes
19/51
I 2a,e seen +iagra"s !i%e in Fig#0 2ere rays see" to >e scattere+ fro" not2inge;uantifie+ using t2e ato"ic scattering *oer an+ t2e density of atoms in the "lane1# Due to t2e@inco"ing’ a,e t2e ato"ic +i*o!es are set into osci!!ation( 2ic2 furt2er act !i%e e"itter of a,es
In Bragg’s ,ie*oint( t2e ato"ic *!anes are to >e %e*t in focus an+ t2e a,e #not %st a ray& i"*ingeson t2e entire *!ane so"e *!anes 2a,e ato"s in contact an+ "ost 2a,e ato"s 2ic2 are not in contacta!ong t2e *!ane see Fig#.1#
5 3o be considered later
6 "lane in >ra))2s (iew"oint can be characteried by two factors: #a& atomic density #atoms/%nit area on the "lane&, #b& atomic scatterin) factorof the atoms.
Fig#0
Fig#.
8/20/2019 XRD notes
20/51
It is +ifficu!t to gi,e an e*!anation of t2e nature of t2e se"i-trans*arent !ayers or
*!anes t2at is i""e+iate!y con,incing( as they are a conce"t rather than a "hysical
reality# Crysta! structures( it2 t2eir regu!ar!y re*eating *atterns( "ay >e referre+ to aD gri+ an+ t2e re*eating unit of t2e gri+( t2e unit ce!!( can >e foun+# T2e gri+ "ay >e
+i,i+e+ u* into sets of *!anes in ,arious orientations an+ it is t2ese *!anes 2ic2 are
consi+ere+ in t2e +eri,ation of Bragg’s !a# In so"e cases( it2 si"*!e crysta!
structures( t2e *!anes a!so corres*on+ to !ayers of ato"s( >ut t2is is not genera!!y t2e
case# See Section 0#G for furt2er infor"ation# So"e of t2e assu"*tions u*on 2ic2 Bragg’s !a is >ase+ "ay see" to >e rat2er
+u>ious# For instance( it is %non t2at +iffraction occurs as a resu!t of interaction
>eteen X-rays an+ ato"s# Furt2er( t2e ato"s +o not ref!ect X-rays >ut scatter or +iffract
t2e" in a!! +irections# 9e(ertheless, the hi)hly sim"lified treatment that is %sed in
deri(in) >ra))2s law )i(es e*actly the same answers as are obtained by a ri)oro%smathematical treatment. ear in "in+ t2at e are
fortunate to 2a,e suc2 a si"*!e an+ *ictures;ue( a!>eit inaccurate( ay to +escri>e 2at
in rea!ity is a ,ery co"*!icate+ *rocess#P 0
01 6nthony R Fest, 8olid 8tate $hemistry and its 6""lications, 8econd Edition, Gohn Filey H 8ons Ltd., $hichester, I.
;ore abo%t the >ra))2s (iew"oint
8/20/2019 XRD notes
21/51
'o is it t2at e are a>!e to get infor"ation a>out !attice *ara"eters of t2e or+erof Angstro"s ato"s 2ic2 are so c!ose!y s*ace+1 using XRD
Fun+a C2ec%
Diffraction is a *rocess in 2ic2
4linear information2 #the d-s"acin) of the "lanes&
is con,erte+ to 4an)%lar information2 #the an)le of diffraction, θ >ra)) &.
If t2e +etector is *!ace+ @far aay’ fro" t2e sa"*!e i#e# @R’ in t2e figure >e!o is !arge1 t2e
+istances a!ong t2e arc of a circ!e t2e +etection circ!e1 get a"*!ifie+ an+ 2ence e can "a%e@easy’ "easure"ents#
T2is a!so i"*!ies t2at in XRD e are concerne+ it2 an)%lar resol%tion instea+ of !inearreso!ution#
Later e i!! see t2at in *o+er+iffraction t2is ang!e of +e,iation.θ1 is *!otte+ instea+ of θ#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
22/51
Forar+ an+ Bac% Diffraction
8/20/2019 XRD notes
23/51
Fun+a C2ec% eteen t2e inci+ent -rays an+ t2e set of *ara!!e! ato"ic *!anes 2ic2 2a,ea s*acing +2%!1# Fhich is ° in the abo(e fi)%re.
Us%ally, θ in this conte*t im"lies θ >ra)) #i.e. the an)le at which >ra))2s e7%ation is
satisfied&.
It is NOT t2e ang!e >eteen t2e -rays an+ t2e sa"*!e surface note: s*eci"ens cou!+ >es*2erica! or cou!+ 2a,e a roug2 surface1#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
24/51
ecause Bragg’se;uation is satisfie+ a @ref!ection’ "ay not >e o>ser,e+#
Let us consi+er t2e case of Cu 7 α ra+iation λ E 0#GJ 1 >eing +iffracte+ fro" 0//1
*!anes of 4o BCC( a E #0G E +0//1#
T2e "issing @ref!ections’
0// 0//.d 8inλ θ = 0//0//
0#GJ/#.JJ
. .#0G18in
d
λ θ = = = 0// 0J#0JKθ = °
But t2is ref!ection is a>sent in BCC 4o
T2e "issing ref!ection is +ue to t2e *resence of a++itiona! ato"s in t2e unit ce!!
2ic2 are *ositions at !attice *oints1 → 2ic2 e s2a!! consi+er net
T2e a,e scattere+ fro" t2e "i++!e *!ane is out of *2ase
it2 t2e ones scattere+ fro" to* an+ >otto" *!anes# I#e# ift2e green rays are in *2ase *at2 +ifference of λ1 t2en t2e
re+ ray i!! >e eact!y out of *2ase it2 t2e green rays
*at2 +ifference of λ3.1#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
25/51
'oe,er( t2e secon+ or+er ref!ection fro" 0//1 *!anes 2ic2 is e;ui,a!ent to t2e first or+erref!ection fro" t2e .//1 *!anes is o>ser,e+
0//
0//
. 0#GJ/#J8
. #0G
8in
d
λ θ = = = . 0
0// .//B .K#.9
nd nd order order θ θ = °
T2is is >ecause if t2e green rays 2a,e a *at2 +ifference of .λ t2en t2e re+ ray i!! 2a,e *at2+ifference of λ 2ic2 i!! sti!! !ea+ to constructi,e interference
$ontin%in) with the case of >$$ ;oJ
8/20/2019 XRD notes
26/51
⇒ &resence of a++itiona! ato"s3ions3"o!ecu!es in t2e )C at !attice *oints #as we may chose a non-"rimiti(e %nit cell&
or as a *art of t2e "otif can alter the intensities of some of the reflections⇒ So"e of t2e ref!ections "ay e,en go "issing
I"*ortant
*oints
&osition of t2e @ref!ections’3@*ea%s’ te!!s us a>out t2e !attice ty*e#
T2e Intensities te!!s us a>out t2e "otif#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
27/51
Intensity of t2e Scattere+ e consi+ere+:01 scattering fro" e!ectrons.1 scattering fro" an ato"1 scattering fro" a unit ce!!
$lick here to know the details
Structure factor ca!cu!ations
$Intensity in *o+er *atterns
Structure factor ca!cu!ations$
Intensity in *o+er *atterns
Structure Factor F1: T2e resu!tant a,e scattere+ >y a!! ato"s of t2e unit ce!!
T2e Structure Factor is in+e*en+ent of t2e s2a*ean+ si=e of t2e unit ce!!V >ut is +e*en+ent on t2e *osition of t2e ato"s3ions etc# it2in t2e ce!!
C!ic% 2ere to %no "ore a>out
Bragg’s e;uation te!!s us a>out t2e *osition of t2e +iffraction *ea%s in ter"s of θ1 → >utte!!s us not2ing a>out t2e intensities# T2e intensities of t2e *ea%s +e*en+ on "any factors asconsi+ere+ 2ere#
http://structure_factor_calculations.ppt/http://structure_factor_calculations.ppt/http://structure_factor_calculations.ppt/http://structure_factor_calculations.ppt/http://structure_factor_calculations.ppt/
8/20/2019 XRD notes
28/51
T2e conce*t of a e'iro'al latti'e an+ t2e Eald Shere 'onstru'tion:
Reci*roca! !attice an+ 5a!+ s*2ere constructions are i"*ortant too!s toar+sun+erstan+ing +iffraction#es*ecia!!y +iffraction in a Trans"ission 5!ectron 4icrosco*e T5411
A !attice in 2ic2 *!anes in t2e rea! !attice >eco"e *oints in t2e reci*roca! !attice is a,ery usefu! one in un+erstan+ing +iffraction#
click here to go to a +etai!e+ +escri*tion of t2ese to*ics#
Reci*roca! Lattice $ 5a!+ S*2ere constructionReci*roca! Lattice $ 5a!+ S*2ere constructionC!ic% 2ere to %no "ore a>out
S ! ti 3 5 ti ti R !
http://reciprocal_lattice.ppt/http://reciprocal_lattice.ppt/http://reciprocal_lattice.ppt/http://reciprocal_lattice.ppt/http://reciprocal_lattice.ppt/
8/20/2019 XRD notes
29/51
Bra*ais +atti'e efle'tions hi'h may be resent efle'tions ne'essaril, absent
Si"*!e a!! None
Bo+y centre+ 2 % !1 e,en 2 % !1 o++
Face centre+ 2( % an+ ! un"ie+ 2( % an+ ! "ie+
5n+ centre+ $ centred& 2 an+ % un"ie+ 2 an+ % "ie+
Bra*ais +atti'e Alloed efle'tions
SC A!!
BCC 2 % !1 e,en
FCC 2( % an+ ! un"ie+
DC5it2er( 2( % an+ ! are a!! o++ or
a!! are e,en H #h k l& di(isible by I
Se!ection 3 5tinction Ru!es
6s we ha(e noted before e(en if >ra))2s e7%ation is satisfied, 4reflections may )o missin)2→ this is d%e to the "resence of additional atoms in the %nit cell.
3he reflections "resent and the missin) reflections d%e to additional atoms in the %nit cell are
listed in the table below. C!ic% 2ere to see t2e +eri,ationsStructure factor ca!cu!ationsC!ic% 2ere to see t2e +eri,ationsStructure factor ca!cu!ations
h - . - l S$ #$$ B$$ /$
8/20/2019 XRD notes
30/51
h - . - l S$ #$$ B$$ /$
0 0//
. 00/ 00/
000 000 000
J .// .// .//G .0/
9 .00 .00
8 ../ ../ ../ ../
K //( ..00/ 0/ 0/
00 00 00 00
0. ... ... ...
0 ./
0J .0 .0
0G
09 J// J// J// J//
0 J0/( ..
08 J00( / J00( /
0K 0 0 0
A!!oe+ ref!ectionsin SC( FCC( BCC
$ DC crysta!s
!attice +ecorate+ it2
"onoato"ic3"onoionic "otif
Cannot >e e*resse+ as 2.% .!.1
Crysta! structure +eter"ination
8/20/2019 XRD notes
31/51
Crysta! structure +eter"ination
4onoc2ro"atic X-rays
0anc2ro"atic X-rays
4onoc2ro"atic X-rays
4any θs orientations1&o+er s*eci"en
&Oy rotation
ROTATIN6CRYSTAL45T'OD
Z fie+
[ ,aria>!e
→
→
Z fie+
[ rotate+
→
→
Z ,aria>!e
[ fie+
→
→
As +iffraction occurs on!y at s*ecific Bragg ang!es( t2e c2ance t2at a ref!ection iso>ser,e+ 2en a crysta! is irra+iate+ it2 "onoc2ro"atic X-rays at a *articu!arang!e is s"a!! #added to this the diffracted intensity is a small fraction of the beam %sed
for irradiation&. T2e *ro>a>i!ity to get a +iffracte+ >ea" it2 sufficient intensity1 is increase+ >y
eit2er ,arying t2e a,e!engt2 λ1 or 2a,ing "any orientations rotating t2ecrysta! or 2a,ing "u!ti*!e crysta!!ites in "any orientations1#
T2e t2ree "et2o+s use+ to ac2ie,e 2ig2 *ro>a>i!ity of +iffraction are s2on >e!o#
nly the "owder method #which is commonly %sed in materials science& will be considered in this te*t.
T'5 &O
8/20/2019 XRD notes
32/51
T'5 &O
8/20/2019 XRD notes
33/51
T2e ratio of 2. % . !.1 +eri,e+ fro" etinction ru!es #earlier "a)e&As e s2a!! see soon t2e ratios of 2. % . !.1 is *ro*ortiona! to Sin.θ
2ic2 can >e use+ in t2e +eter"ination of t2e !attice ty*e
SC 0 . J G 9 8 ?
BCC 0 . J G 9 ?
FCC J 8 00 0. ?
DC 8 00 09 ?
Note t2at e 2a,e to consi+er t2e ratio of on!y to !ines to +istinguis2 FCC an+ DC# I#e# if t2eratios are :J t2en t2e !attice is FCC#
But( to +istinguis2 >eteen SC an+ BCC e 2a,e to go to !ines
&O
8/20/2019 XRD notes
34/51
In t2e *o+er sa"*!e t2ere are crysta!!ites in +ifferent @ran+o"’ orientations a *o!ycrysta!!ine sa"*!etoo 2as grains in +ifferent orientations1
T2e co2erent -ray >ea" is +iffracte+ >y t2ese crysta!!ites at ,arious ang!es to t2e inci+ent +irection A!! t2e +iffracte+ >ea"s ca!!e+ @ref!ections’1 fro" a sing!e *!ane( >ut fro" +ifferent crysta!!ites !ie on
a cone# De*en+ing on t2e ang!e t2ere are forar+ an+ >ac% ref!ection cones# A +iffracto"eter can recor+ t2e ang!e of t2ese ref!ections a!ong it2 t2e intensities of t2e ref!ection T2e X-ray source an+ +iffracto"eter "o,e in arcs of a circ!e- "aintaining t2e Bragg @ref!ection’
geo"etry as in t2e figure rig2t1
&O
8/20/2019 XRD notes
35/51
* g
Mt is 4somewhat diffic%lt2 to act%ally (is%alie a random assembly of crystallites )i(in) "eaks at (ario%s an)els in a XRD scan. 3he fi)%res below are e*"ected to )i(e a 4(is%al feel2 for the same. 0!y oriente+ crysta!!ites
h h.l + Sinθ1 θ
0 0// J#// /#0K 00#0/
. 00/ .#8 /#. 0G#8/
000 .#0 /# 0K#J8
J .// .#// /#K ..#9J
G .0/ 0#K /#J .G#G/
9 .00 0#9 /#J .8#0
8 ../ 0#J0 /#GJ .#KK
K // 0# /#G8 G#.
0/ 0/ 0#.9 /#90 #G/
For con,enience t2e source"ay >e stationary an+ t2esa"*!e an+ +etector "ay
rotate\ >ut t2e effect ise;ui,a!ent1
Deter"ination of Crysta! Structure fro" .θ ,ersus Intensity Data in &o+er 4et2o+
8/20/2019 XRD notes
36/51
In t2e *oer +iffraction "et2o+ a .θ ,ersus intensity I1 *!ot is o>taine+ fro" t2e+iffracto"eter an+ associate+ instru"entation1#
T2e @intensity’ is t2e area un+er t2e *ea% in suc2 a *!ot # 93 the hei)ht of the "eak&.
T2e infor"ation of i"*ortance o>taine+ fro" suc2 a *attern is t2e @re!ati,e intensities’ an+ t2e a>so!ute ,a!ue of t2e intensities is of !itt!e i"*ortance t2e !onger e irra+iate t2e sa"*!e− t2e "ore i!! >et2e intensity un+er t2e *ea%1 for no1# M is rea!!y +iffracte+ energy as Intensity is Ener)y/area/time1#
A ta>!e is *re*are+ as in t2e net s!i+e to ta>u!ate t2e +ata an+ "a%e ca!cu!ations to fin+ t2ecrysta! structure restricting ourse!,es to cu>ic crysta!s for t2e *resent1#
Deter"ination of Crysta! Structure fro" .θ ,ersus Intensity Data in &o+er 4et2o+
!owder diffraction "attern from 6l
Radiation: $% C α , λ A .OI N
Increasing θ
Increasing +
Intensity I1 2as units of5nergy3area3ti"e >ut 2ere it
is *!otte+ as arbitrary %nits#
)sua!!y in +egrees °1
T2is is *ea% so"eti"es ca!!e+ a!ine- a 2ango,er fro" De>yeSc2errer ca"era usage1
8/20/2019 XRD notes
37/51
n .θ θ Intensity Sinθ Sin. θ ratio
Deter"ination of Crysta! Structure !attice ty*e1 fro" .θ ,ersus Intensity Data
3he followin) table is made from the θ (ers%s Mntensity data #obtained from a XRD e*"eriment on a "owder sam"le #em"ty startin) table of col%mns is shown below- com"leted table shown later&.
d d ff f l d λ N
8/20/2019 XRD notes
38/51
!owder diffraction "attern from 6l Radiation: $% C α , λ A .OI N
Note: T2is is a sc2e"atic *attern
In rea! *atterns *ea%s or not i+ea!i=e+ δ *ea%s → >roa+ene+ Increasing s*!itting of *ea%s it2 ↑g θ
α H α "eaks )et resol(ed in the hi)h an)le "eaks&
&ea%s are a!! not of sa"e intensity
9o >rac%ets are use+ aroun+ t2e in+ee+ nu">ers#the "eaks corres"ond to "lanes in the real s"ace&
Note t2at t2ere are no >rac%etsaroun+ t2e indices
! d diff ti tt f 6l Radiation: $% Cα λ A OI N
8/20/2019 XRD notes
39/51
!owder diffraction "attern from 6l
0 0 0
. / /
. . /
C 0 0
. . . J / /
C α H C α "eaks resol(ed in hi)h an)le "eaks#in and I "eaks this can be seen&
Radiation: $% C α , λ .OI N
Note: &ea%s or not i+ea!i=e+ δ *ea%s → >roa+ene+#
Increasing s*!itting of *ea%s it2 ↑g θ#
&ea%s are a!! not of sa"e intensity#
T2ere is a @noisy’ >ac%groun+#
Mn low an)le "eaks C α H C α "eaks mer)ed
Fun+a C2ec%
8/20/2019 XRD notes
40/51
Fhat is the ma*im%m (al%e of θ "ossible #e*"erimentally&=
Fun+a C2ec% e a!tere+
$o%ld be d%e to te*t%re in the sam"le.
Fun+a C2ec% 6ns: °
At θ E K/° t2e @ref!ecte+ ray’ is o**osite in+irection to t2e inci+ent ray#
Beyon+ t2is ang!e( it is as if t2e source an++etector *ositions are sitc2e+#
⇒ .θ"a is 08/°#
Instru"enta! >roa+ening
Crysta! +efects #4bent2 "lanes&
&ea% Broa+ening S"a!! crysta!!ite si=e
Note *ea% s*!itting 2as not >een inc!u+e+ 2ere as t2is
co"es fro" 4symmetrylowerin)2 #i.e. crystal with
lower symmetry&
Mncl%din) those comin) from strain fields associated with these defects Click here to know moreClick here to know more
h ll d h k ll =
8/20/2019 XRD notes
41/51
Fun+a C2ec% Fhat will determine how many "eaks M will )et=
01 λ s"a!!er t2e a,e!engt2 of t2e X-rays( "ore i!! >e t2e nu">er of *ea%s *ossi>!e#
Fro" Bragg’s e;uation: λE.+Sinθ( Sinθ1"a i!! corres*on+ to +"in# Sinθ1"aE0#
'ence( +"inEλ3.# 'ence( if λ is s"a!! t2en *!anes it2 s"a!!er + s*acing i#e# t2ose 2ic2
occur at 2ig2er .θ ,a!ues1 i!! a!so s2o u* in a XRD *atter *o+er *attern1# 'i(en thate*"erimentally θ cannot be )reater than ° .
.1 Lattice ty*e in SC e i!! get "ore *ea%s as co"*are+ to say1 FCC3DC# ther thin)s bein)e7%al.
1 Loer t2e sy""etry of t2e crysta!( "ore t2e nu">er of *ea%s e#g#( in tetragona! crysta!t2e 0// *ea% i!! !ie at a +ifferent .θ as co"*are+ to t2e //0 *ea%1#
.d8inλ θ =( )
"in
"aF
.d 8in
λ
θ =
"in.
d λ
=
D t i ti f C t ! St t ! tti t 1 f .θ I t it D tSo!,e+ ea"*!e
So!,e+ ea"*!e
8/20/2019 XRD notes
42/51
θ θ
Sinθ
Sinθ
ratio 2nde3 d
0 8#G. 0K#.9 /# /#00 Q 000 .#J
. JJ#9 ..#8 /#8 /#0J I .// .#/
9G#0J .#G /#GJ /#.K ../ 0#J
J 8#.9 K#0 /#9 /#J/ 00 0#..
G 8.#J J0#.G /#99 /#J ... 0#0
9 KK#00 JK#GGG /#9 /#G8 S J// 0#/0
00.#/ G9#/0G /#8 /#9K 0 /#K
8 009#9/ G8# /#8G /#. J./ /#K0
K 0#J 98#G /#K /#8 I J.. /#8
0/ 09#8 80#8K /#KK /#K8 T /#8
Deter"ination of Crysta! Structure !attice ty*e1 fro" .θ ,ersus Intensity Data
Fro" t2e ratios in co!u"n 9 e conc!u+e t2at FCC
Let %s ass%me that we ha(e the θ (ers%s intensity "lot from a diffractometer 3o know the lattice ty"e we need only the "osition of the "eaks #as tab%lated below&
. d 8inλ θ =000 0000#GJ . . /#CC
C
ad 8inθ = =
o
J#/JAa 6l = →
)sing
8/20/2019 XRD notes
43/51
.θ θ Sinθ Sin. θRatios
of Sin.θDi,i+ing Sin.θ >y
/#0J3 E /#/JJ99
8/20/2019 XRD notes
44/51
More Sol*edE3amles on 4/
$lick here
Co"*arison of +iffraction *atterns of SC( BCC $ B. structures
$lick here
Fhat ha""ens when we increase or decrease λ=
8/20/2019 XRD notes
45/51
Fun+a C2ec% Fhat ha""ens when we increase or decrease λ =
Fe had "ointed o%t that λ a is "referred for diffraction. Let %s see what ha""ens if we 4drastically2 increase or decrease λ .#3his is only a tho%)ht e*"eriment++&
If e +ou>!e λ e gettoo fe *ea%s
If e "a%e λ s"a!!a!! t2e *ea%s getcro+e+ to s"a!!
ang!es
8/20/2019 XRD notes
46/51
Bra,ais !attice +eter"ination
Lattice *ara"eter +eter"ination
Deter"ination of so!,us !ine in *2ase +iagra"s
Long range or+er
A**!ications of XRD
Crysta!!ite si=e an+ Strain
Deter"ine if t2e "ateria! is a"or*2ous or crysta!!ine
8/20/2019 XRD notes
47/51
Diffraction ang!e .θ1
I n t e n s i t y
K/ 08//
K/ 08//
Diffraction ang!e .θ1
I n t e n s i t y
N Li;ui+ 3 A"or*2ous so!i+
K/ 08//
Diffraction ang!e .θ1 I n t e n s i t y N
4onoato"ic gas
Sc2e"atic of +ifference >eteent2e +iffraction *atterns of ,arious *2ases
S2ar* *ea%s
Diffuse &ea%
No *ea%
s
A"or*2ous so!i+
8/20/2019 XRD notes
48/51
Diffuse *ea% fro"Cu-r-Ni-A!-Si4eta!!ic g!ass
XRD *atterns1 courtesy: Dr# 7a!!o! 4on+a!( 4S5( IIT7
6ct%al diffraction "attern from anamor"ho%s solid
A a"or*2ous so!i+ 2ic2 s2os g!ass transition in a Differentia! Scanning Ca!ori"etry DSC1 *!ot is a!so ca!!e+ a g!ass# Mn 4)eneral %sa)e2 a )lass may be considered e7%i(alent to aamor"ho%s solid #at least loosely in the str%ct%ral sense&.
S2ar* *ea%s are "issing# Broa+ +iffuse *ea% sur,i,esP the "eak corres"onds to the a(era)e s"acin) between atoms which the diffraction e*"eriment 4"ickso%t2
Fun+a C2ec%F
un+a C2ec%
8/20/2019 XRD notes
49/51
Fun+a C2ec% Fun+a C2ec% < at s t e u s*ac g >etee * a es *oss > e a c ysta 'o "any +iffraction *ea%s can e get fro" a *o+er *attern
. . .
$%bic crystal
hkl ad
h k l =
+ +
Let us consi+er a cu>ic crysta! it2out !oss in genera!ity1
As 2(%( ! increases( @+’ +ecreases ⇒ e cou!+ 2a,e *!anes it2 infinitesimal s*acing
0/
0
ad a= =
00
.
ad =
00/
ad =
0.
G
ad =
CJ G.G
a a
d = =
8/20/2019 XRD notes
50/51
$ A o to c ease t e u >e o *ea s a *atte
e insufficient for a gi,en ana!ysis#
T2e nu">er of *ea%s can >e increase+ in to ays:
01 using 4o 7 instea+ of Cu 7_.1 first o>tain *attern it2 ` fi!ter an+ t2en re"o,e t2e fi!ter to get "ore !ines#
8/20/2019 XRD notes
51/51