[x]NO o I Dkp.asltion - digital.library.unt.edu/67531/metadc622744/m2/1/high_res_d/16873.pdf · HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026 Rev. O SPREADER BEAM ANALYSIS FOR THE CASTOR GSF CASK 1.0 INTRODUCTION

p.NGINEEFIING DATA TRANSMITTAL

kPaw 1 of _

IEDT 61956:

2. To: (Receiving organization) 3. From: (originating organization)

Distribution Packaging Engineering5. Proj. /Prog. /DepDivD: v.: 6. Design Authority/ Design Age”t/Cog.

Engr. :03EO0 E. P. Clements8. originator Remarks:

For approval .

?1. Receiver Remarks: 11A. Design B8se(ine Docwnmt? [] ,,s [x]NO

15.

F

(A)kern (B) DocurnentlDrawlng No.No

1 HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026

1

1

.

DATA(c)

Sheet

N..

~_

(D)Rev,No.

o

(E) Title or Dmoription of Data

Transmitted

Spreader BeamAnalvsis for theCASTbR GSF Cask

KEY

10. System/B ldg. /Faci (ity:

NA12. Major AsSm. Dug. No. :

NA13.Permit/Permit App[ic’at ion No.:

NA14. Requi red Respanse Date:

W17(F) (G) (H (I)

Approval Reason Origi- RecAv-

Desig for natm m

“at., Trans. Oispo. Di*F.o-

rnittal sitb” ski.”

NA 11

@w...1 D..iwat.r IF) I Ream. for Transmittal (G) IDkp.asltion (Hj & {1)

E, S, Q, D or N/A 1. Approval 4 Review 1. Approved 4, Reviewed n.alcornment

(s.. WHC-CM-3-5, 2. Release 5 Post-Review 2, Approved Wcormmnt 5, Reviewed wlcmmmnt

S...1 2.7) 3. Information 6, Dist, (Receipt Acknow. Required) 3 Disapproved wlcmmmnt 6, Receipt acknowledged

17. SIGNATURE/DISTRIBUTION

(See Approval Designator for required signatures)

(G) (HI (G)

Rea- (.0 Narm(H)

C@ (K) ?+maturs (L) Data [M) MSIN ~ea.DisP (J1 Narrm (KI Sign.4ture (L) Date (Ml MSIN

son ,0” /

Design Authority 1 I SS Shiraga q+/ f7 HI-15

Des i gn Agent n

1 I Cog. Eng. : EP C[ements

1 CW. I@.: JG Field

C!A

Safety 1Env.

I20. 21. DDE APPRDVAL (if required)

k ‘+ ‘“ – *%Q

Ctr(. No.JO F&e [1 Approved

[1 Approved ./commentsAutho,lze.d Re.PremnMtlve Date Design / Date

Or,., nator

[1 Disapproved Wcomnrmtsfor Recei.ina Oroanizatio. Coo.,zan . . .

BD-7400 -172-2 (05/96) GEF097

BD-7400-1 72-1

HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026,

Spreader Beam Analysis for the CASTOR GSFCask

y

Rev. O

E. P. ClementsRust Federal Services Inc. Northwest Operations, Richland, WA 99352U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200

EDT/ECN: EDT 619562 UC: 512Org Code: 03EO0 Charge Code: POFK06B&R Code: 820201000 Total Pages: --34 33p

Key Words: spreader beam, CASTOR GSF cask, 1oad test

Abstract: The purpose of this report is to document the results of the150% rated capacity load test that was performed by DynCorp Hoisting andRigging for the CASTOR GSF special lifting beams.

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference herein to any specific ccirrr!ercial product, process, or service bytrade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessari iy constitute or inpty itsendorsement, recomnecdat i on, or f aver ing by the United States Government or any agency thereof orits contractors or subcontractors.

Printed in the United States of America. To obtain copies of this docurent, contact: DocunentContro[ Services, P.O. Box 950, Mai Lstop H6-08, Rich Land UA 99352, Phone (509) 372-2420;Fax (509) 376-4989.

[Ay~ ~“8”Td9r

I

‘-7

4;$$

i ::’37~ ,:;::2 ) ‘u’‘“”-’

I‘-L-...;

. . + 9/77Re( e&e Approva I Date Re[ease Stamp

Approved for Public Release

A-6400-073 (01/97) GEF32%

HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026 Rev, O

CONTENTS

l.O INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2,0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

3.0 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,,, ,,.,.. 1

4.P REFERENCES, .,....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...3

5.OAPPENOICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...4

5.1 ORIGINALGERMAN LOADTESTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5.2 HANFORO LOADTESTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

5,3 CASTOR LIFTING BEAM EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

LIST OF FIGURES

I. LiftTestAdaptor. ............................ . ...... . ... . 22. CASTOR LiftingBaam . .................................................23. LiftTestArrangement. ........................... . .. .. .. .. 3

LIST OF TERMS

ANSI

ASTM

IAEA

SARP

American National Standards Institute

Amarican Society for Testing and Meteriala

International Atomic Energy Agancy

Safaty Analysis Report for Packaging

ii

HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026 Rev. O

SPREADER BEAM ANALYSIS FOR THE CASTOR GSF CASK

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Thepurpose ofthisreportistodocument theresullsofthe 150% ratedcapacityloadtestperformedby DynCorp Hoistingand Riggingon theCASTOR GSF specialcask Iifdng beams. The

two lifting beams were originally rated and tested at 20,000kg (44,0001b) by the caskmanufacturer in Garmany. The testing performed by DynCorp rated and tested the lifting beams to

30,000 kg (66,000 lb) +0%, -5%, for Hanford Site use,

The CASTOR GSF cask, used totransport isotopic Heat Sources (canisters), must be lifted

with its own designed lifting beam system (Figures 1, 2, and 3). As designed, the beam material is

RSt 37-2 (equivalent to American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTMI A-570), the eye plate

is St 52-2 (equivalent to ASTM A-516), and the lifting pin is St 50 (equivalent to ASTM A-515).

The beam hastwoopposing 58mm(2.3in, ) diameter by 120mm(4,7 in.) length, high grade steel

pins that engage thecask for lifting. Thepinshave a manual Iocking mechanism to prevent

disengagement from the casks. The static, gross weight (Ioaded)oftha cask 18,640kg

(41,000 lb)onthe pins prevents movement of thepins during lifting. This isdueto the frictional

force of the cask on the pins when lifting begins,

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Thetwo lifting beams (l A and 18)delivered asauxiliary equipment with the CASTORGSF

casks were designed, built, tested, and used bythecask manufacturer in Germany (Section 5.1).

The beams were built and tested to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) requirements, For

usa at the Hanford Site, the beams shall meet the requirements listed in the Hanford Site Hoisting

and Rigging Manua/, Section 11,0, “Below-the-Hook-Lifting Devices” (RL 1993) and the American

National Standard Institute (ANSI) N14.6, Radioactive Materials Special Lifting Devices for Shipping

Containers Weighing 10,OOO1b (4500 kg)or More (ANSl 1993). To meet the Hanford Site and

ANSI criteria, both lifting beams were analyzed toensure3to 1 against yield, requirements are met

(Section 5.3). The beams were physically load tested (Section 5.2) inaccordance with the HanfordSite Hoisting and Rigging rVlanual, Section 11.0, “8elow-the-Hook-Lif ting Devices” and

ANSI N14.6, Section 6,3(a), “Testing,” tovarify continuing compliance, The two lifting beams

were tested to 1507. 30,000 kg (66,000 lb) +0%, -5% for an actual load test of 29,345 kg

(64,5601 b)heldfor 10 minutes. This test wasperformed with certified weights and rigging, Thebeams were inspected after testing asdescribedin ANSl 6.3(a) and no discrepancies were found,

3.0 CONCLUSION

The two CASTOR GSF cask lifting beams areonly intended anddesigned for their particular

use as described in the CASTOR Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP)

(HNF-SD-TP-SARP-021). The beams meet both the Hanford Site Hoisting and Riggirrg Marrua/(Section 11. O)and ANSl N14,6 (Saction 6.3,1 [al) criteria foruseon the Hanford Site. Analysis

demonstrates the beams meet asafety factor of 3to 1 against yield forthe approved load. The

Hanford Site approved rating is 29,345 kg (64,500 lb).

1


Figure 1. Lift Test Adaotor

) ,{,,,-

, (,,,,

Figure 2.

— ,7.,

, s s,,,.,. ,,,,,,,

CASTOR Lifting Beam,

2


Figure 3. Lift Test Arrangement,

,,Lr I .. .. ...-1

B s *,,.,! w,,,,,

4.0 REFERENCES

ANSI, 1993, American National Standard for Radioactive Materials Special Lifting Devicas for

Shipping Containers Weighing 10,000 lb (4500 kg) or More, ANSI N 14.6, American

National Standards Institute, New York, New York,

HNF-SD-TP-SARP-021, Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (Onsite) CASTOR GSF Cask, Rust

Federal Services Inc. Northwest Operations, Richland, Washington,

RL, 1993, Hanford Site Hoisting and Rigging Manual, DOEIRL-92-36, U.S. Department of Energy,

Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington,

3

Prufn$ichweis fur Lastaufnahme- und Anschlagmittel gem. s 40 VBG 9a Betriebsndllel-Nr.

./V,.-d 1Kette ~ sell 3

,, . . . .Band 0 Traverse 12 Gcluinge Cl ,.., ...,,,,., ,,, LI

Kunde ‘, @!!efi .~ d~ !fi:.. .,,. Eins.atzort .!%LaflW.,.,,,.

Hers[ellcr/L,ef erer ~~bb:timb!{. ,,,,,, Amahl dm Wc@x Auf3@@mlzeu...=.. 2

Werksabnahmezcugms ., I . ,. ,150. mm d . . . ...56 . . .... . mm

We,ks[oll RSt .37:2 Tragfahtgkmt ~

*Zubehor ., Prtillasl ,,, ,, ,,

20.m3kra

S%br.~-Nr. ..l? 8 ,,!3. Gcsam!lraglahigkeit be,

E8gengewlcht ,,, ,. ..?.. 2?.?.. kg 60° Neigungs + ....................... . kg

Insla”dsetzu”g .“d Warmebehandiu”g von vom Fach.ausschui3 Esen und Me[all, Sachge-Ketlem dw G.leklasse 3, 5, G und 8 mJr v.m blet Kelhm, errnachtigt smd.KeUenhemtcllem und Werkslatten, d,e hierzu

D. KRANTECHNIK D. KRANTECHNIK D. KRANTECHNIK D. KRANTECHNIK A.G

we,! W@ NOrd S“d 0,, Saw/e!.

SPr”ic,.z,.,,a,e m.d.r.”..s,.s,r. , A,” Gc.aheha”s 3 mhw!!,zks,r. ,9

“o”,WW, S,, G D.,, 1,3 W“,.,g.,n D-99438 Gad EJWka CHMX60@,,8sdk”

0.4088, Ra,mqen ,,$ ,0, ! 35),, ,, ,,, ,0364 %,2,,,, T4:,0MII]8s337s,

,., .,02, 0,)0420,, ,.” (0,, 3,)40 ,, ,.,. (03 Gd m) 2,, 5, sax (oo4,, ),33c@c4

,., ,02, 02, m 27 %

Skizzc/I

km Nem :t gcpfit : 04.07.1996

/

.,4 -

. .,..’,Q/. ?

m0

n20

ol

Prtifnachweis fur Lastaufnahme- und Anschlaqmittel gem. s 40 VBG 9. Betrlcbsmittel.Nr.

Ketto ~ Scil Cl Elan60 Traverse~ti’&angc12 .C1

Werksabnahmczeugrms ..., I = ..f@.., mm d = ............<? mm

Wcrksloll %’Jk 3?-2 Tr@dGgkmt ~

Inslandsetzung und Wamnebehandl.ng von vwn Fachausschui3 %en und Melall, Sachge-

Kel[en der Guleklasse 3, 5, 6 und 8 nur von b,et Ke[ten, ertmicht,gt sind,Kettenhws!ellwn und Wtvks! alten, die hierzu

D. K. AN7Ec Mtl, w. 0. KR&NTEcHN!K D.x,ANIEc”M,X LI.KIIAN7EC”N, K &a

w.,, ““dmm S“d 0s, Sch”emS.rwce.z.n!,a,. Tho.dor.He.,s-S,r., Am G..,hcl!a”s 3 RudU(ucksW. ,9

Hmbmjcr s!,.6 D.741 39 Schwaqm 0.99438 aad Eierka CH-83W Bmhlselim

D.40,82 Ra,mge” Tel [07,38 )40,17.,. ,02,02) 858,.0

m,, ,oL7Eds8, 3,007 Tel., ,004 !,] 8333757

f.. ,07,38] 407s Fax (0384S3] 3,008 Fax(00411)83308M

F,., (02,02) 8585.88

;

skizz( Foto


5.2 HANFORD LOAD TESTS

5. --—-. -..—:-_..-—. — . -.. .-.a.~ . . . . .

(-’i ‘“.==_----.___--—_——-s==, 3-_____ ===..= -----------.RANE & RIGGING NORK ORDE~. ---––-–

PAGE : 1 03/07/97 07:59:56

Job Number 3R-97-8754/W

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.9.

10.

11.

Requested By DONALD L.2RUEOrg. 408 . Telephone NO. 376-7105 MSIN G3-08

Charge Code POFK06

Date of Request 03/04/97

Response Required N1A

Type of Work

Location

qrea 1100AXEABldg 1171 RoomOther

Description

.,.

INSFECT- LOAD TEST 2 SP3EA.DER !3A3S FOR LOAOING GERMAN CASKS @ 324

CONTACT AT 324 TO GET THE SPREA.DER B.ZRS IS STEVE HALSTEAD376-3973. PERFCiW A 150% LCAD TEST. (66,000 LBS) ALSOPERFORMIXSPECTION TO PROCEDURE 7–GN–1OO & L(X4D TEST TO A WRITTENPROCEDURE IN THIS P.ACK;.GE !lEC029 ALL INFORMATION CN DATASHEETS IN THIS P.!CK.~.GE

Signature DateReleased by R. J. GILLESPIE 03/03/97Craft CompleteField Nork CompleteCancel led =$=- =

2esources Req”i~edServicing

Res Code Description Qty Est Hrs Org Act Hrs

313. Crane Cperator _l_ __035

C/RIron Worker 3- _ C/R k

14B Truck Driver – Bv ~ __SUPR

c/3. +Supervisor

-L —-C/R

3R-PI, plznner/Scheduler _ _ C/R

6


. ...—.--- .. . . —__.—....... (? “ ~

‘ MES MAINTENANCEPROCEDURE PROC. NO. 7-GN-1OOPERIODIC TO ANNUAL CONDITION Inspection OF .REV. 2, CHG. A

BELOW-THE-HOOK LIFTING DEVICES PAGE 17 of 21

OATA SHEET (Sheet 1 of 5)

7.0 INSTRUCTIONS (Record S - Satisfactory, U - Unsatisfactory or N/A - Not

Applicable on steps below)

. .

sTEP S-U-NjA COMMENTS INITIAL jOATE

7.1.1 5 Ok /@z-fa~, /7. 1.2 s OK Plii[ 5&J>

7.1.3 ~ ‘“ OK R& 4447

7. 1.4 Ok /4%<#u;, I/

7.2.1. a \l &

b IV. ‘

c ~<

d ~/#

e k~

f Kp

9 n~_.!—

7.3,1. a ~~ P

b VI &

c Ylfi

d w/*

e nfi

f ky

I ; ‘$

i7.3.7Ud!k

>______________________>ml..& q@fil>>aALL. E= .----------------------<

HNF+3D-TP-RPT-026 Rev,O

— —_. _.._ ..—:.., ——--...—.——.—.——— .–-..... —.,,-,

. ‘n”” o

MES MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE PROC. NO. 7-GN-1oo

PERIOOIC TO ANNUAL CONOITION INSPECTION OF REV. 2, CHG. A

BELOWTHE-HOOK LIFTING DEVICES PAGE 18 of 21


7.Q INSTRUCTIONS (Record S - Satisfactory, U - Unsatisfactory or N/A - Not


s-------------------- .,1,:. L’??m 1, ALL .E . . ●----------------------<

8


-- .:.. ——--—=A— -. —.__.. —.— ..__. —.

$.,.

.. . . e“. “ ollES MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE PROC. NO. 7-GN-1OO

PERIOOIC To ANNUAL CONOITION INSPECTION OF REV. 2, CHG. ABELOW-THE-HOOK LIFTING DEVICES PAGE 19 of 21

DATA SHEET (Sheet 3 of 5)

7.6 INSTRUCTIONS (’Record S - Satisfactory, U - Unsatisfactory or N/A - Not

Applicable on steps below) .

.>

9

HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026 Rev.O

---- . .. . .... . -——.= .......— -–--—....

“~ oMES MAINTENANCE PRocEDuRE PROC. NO. 7-GN-1OO

PERIOOIC TO ANNUAL CONOITION INSPECTION OFREV. 2, CHG. A

BELOW-THE-HOOK LIFTING OEVICES PAGE 20 of 21


HOOK IOEWTIFICATION RECORO

Inspection Type (Circle one): Initial j140nthlyjPeriodic(Specify return to service, pre-Cri tical Lift, etc. )

Inspection Oate ‘“ Hook Location/Bldg.’

Hoist Wfg.

Hoist Serial No.

Hoist Capacity

Hook Dimension “A”

Hook Oimension “C” IOriginal if KI)OIj I1 ‘;;!*

g:g;T;~~’o k as 10S t tip o“ Ihook as practical.

\—-/

>---------------------- > ,~f,~.&!@?.Lff lN ALL . . . . ‘----------------------<

10


m, - ..........~..,,:,.... . -.-—— -----------—.,,

(-’l.,:.,

f’?‘MES MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE

PROC. NO. 7-GN-1OO

PERIOOIC TO ANNUAL WYCIITION Inspection OFREV. 2, CHG. A

BELOW-THE-HOOK LIFTING oEVICESPAGE 21 of 21


HOOK IDENTIFICATION RECORD

Inspection Type (Circle one): Initial J140nthlyJPeriodic(Specify return to service, pre-Cri tical Lift, etc. )

Inspection Date Hook L8cat’ion/Bldg.

Hoist Wfg. Hook 1.0. WO.

Hoist Serial No. Hook Capacity

Hoist Capacity Hook Ilfg.

Hook Oimension “A”

++/”””

Hook Oimensioll “B”

Hook Oimension ‘(C”Origlna i Known Current

Caliper Serial 110. alibration Oate

Hook IJOE Accept e ‘ect Oate

Qualified Inspector ate

NOTE: ‘Place nu$bers on ho k as 10S to t;p of h k as practical.

\ 7’” ‘L /’\ -- ‘~’”’””i”’’”~””’l”””!]

/

/(’ t60K I1<SPEC1)OI1 11,FOWAIIO!I

.>------------------------‘Vxg~~ti ‘)4 ALL ‘= .. ‘----------------------<

11


,.

. .LO.4D TEST PROCEDURE

BELO!4-THE-HOOK LIFTING DEVICE

‘ppROvAL:~ Date

‘ppROvAL: ~ Date

‘ppRO’AL: ~ tiIianager

12


—. ——. —.— ...—....-._-

. .

1.0

2.0

3.0

c?LOAO TEST IrisTRUCTIONS

PURPOSE

1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to provide a sequence ofoperations for load testing a below-the-hook lifting device.

REFERENCES

2.1 Hanford Site Hoisting

2.2 MHC-CN-4-4, VOL. 1-3,

2.3 Environmental , Safety,

RESPONSIBILITIES

3.1

?.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

and Rigging Illznual OOE-RL-92-36

Industrial Safety 142n!J21

~nd Health Program I,lanual.

The equipment custodian (designated by the F:cility m:n~ger) isresponsible for ensuring maintenance inspections and testing ofequipment are not delinquent. He is also responsible formaintaining records o? the repairs, inspections, tests, ?nd ?nymainten~nce performed .- He will assure these records are .svailzblefor audit.

Industrial Safety shal 1 ensure compliance with hoisting andrigging equipment requirements.

A designated Ie;der shall be appointed to all hoisting ?nd rigging(H&R) activities, which include both critical and noncriticallifts. For critical lifts, the designated leader may also be thePIC. For ordinary lifts, the designated leader may be a crewmember.

Designated Le;der or (if needed) Site Crane and Rigging Services(SC&RS) Supervisor/or D2signee is responsible for (1) coordinatingthe test lift, (2) ensuring a procedure is prepared and approved,(3) ensuring that personnel are qualified to perform the work, (4)ensuring that all equipment and rigging are qualified.

3.4.1 Designated Le~der or Supervisor shall conduct a pre-jobmeeting .with all personnel involved in the test.

QC~llOE shall conduct IJDE test of heldS after load test. NDErequire rlents, if required, will be called out on design drawing orlisted on the kork pack~ge.

13

HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026 Rev,O

—- _—.. —. .——..— .—. .,. . c?

4.0 RE@JIREME~TS

4.1 Before each load test, confirm that all equipment inspectionsmaintena ce zre currsnt.

Eo,ui~Cu%d9& or $upervlsor .&

and

The Equipment Custodi.?n or the SC&RS Supervisor shall verify that:.* ~ ~all rig ing and ;cces. criss inspections zre current.

,?-=’6Equipmlfnt Cust6dian or SC&RS Supervl sor *

— 4.3 Load test weight 64 J6CS is known and documentedwithin a tolarznce of +06, -5%. Weights shall be traceable to a

recognized stzndzrd, verified by: Engineering calculations, acal ibr.ated (+01, -5;!) lozd ~,easuring device or calculating loadbased on kncb,n unit wsights znd dimensions of test fixture.

~_ ~/5A;,units zccepted prior to test.

Desi~d&ted Lezder or SC&RS Supervisor Oa e

5.1 The Oesignatsd Lezder or Supervisor shall conduct a pre-jobmeeting prior to work start to review this ”procedure with allinvolved personnel znd resoli>e any safety concerns. TheSupervisor shall ensure involved personnel wear appropriate safetyattire (e.g., hzrd hat, safety shoes, gloves, safety glasses, andany other personal protective equipment required). A designated

n shall be ‘ppointed by the SC&RS Supervisor.

+&A

Oesignat’4clLe~der or SC!RS Supervisor Oate

6.o LOAO TEST

6.1 Barricade or rope off work area to warn unauthorized personnel ofload test in progress.

6.2 Position hook or device over center of’ gravity of load.

6.3 Attach rigging to hook or attachment as directedsupervisor. Stop znd inspect, zdjust rigging as

6.4 Hoist load a few inches and hold for 5 minutes.

by theneeded.

14


6.5

6.6

—. --— ... . .........

set ioad do~fl and remove rigging or test “weight assembly.visually inspectload bearing partsto verifythat no damage hasbeen done.

NDE of load: be~;ing wel;; after load test (if required).

x- R:2/”

7.0 LOAD TEST REPORT

7.1 Complete load test report.

7.2 The reports shal 1 be PI zcedequipment custodizn.

-.. . .in the Crane History file by the

15


- . ..— —. —_..._... ..... .

J., 0,,,

LOAD TEST REPORT FORM

* Building l{o. /Facility 3>4 $(A ‘*’I.D.No. i - k ModelNo. ti)i

Load Test Date 3-Z6-y7

Manufacturer~~c

* Rated Capacity_ 44Mk9* Last Load Test Date . fl/~ k!eight(s) Lifted

I m

* This Lozd Test:, Weight Lifted L4,!5L0

Remarks:

.

[ ] Qua] ity Assurance

[ ] Third ;;rty Verification(Check One)

After Lo~d Test place This Document in the crane’ History File.

16


—— _ —.. ._...... ...—-

:..“, !7 (-”

MES MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE PROC. ND. 7-GN-lDO

.PER1OOIC TO ANNUAL CONOITION INSPECTION OF REV. 2, CHG. A

BELOW-THE-HOOK LIFTING DEVICES PAGE 17 of 21


7.b INSTRUCTIONS (Record S - Satisfactory, U - Unsatisfactory or N/A - Not

Appl icable on steps below)

sTEP s-U-NIA COI’UIENTS INITIAL fDATE

,, ,1.,I

2I c) K. I ~K

,

11 /,1.4 I JI c) K l’v~l

11-

Ir7.3.2—,’ ,. 1 I

\\/’&

D----- . . . ..- . . ..--- . . . . .‘X::<-.>,JALLW=O ‘----------------------<

17


—..- _—...-.... .. ...--------- ...=.-.,.<.,;: ,.“ n n“: MES MAINTENANCE F’ROCEOURE PROC. NO. 7-GN-1OO

PERIOOIC To ANNUAL coNOITIONINSPECTIONOF REV. 2, CHG. ABELoW-THE-HOOKLIFTINGDEVICES PAGE 18 of 21


7.0 INSTRUCTIONS (Record S - Satisfactory, U - Unsatisfactory or N/A - Wot


18


-...——-.-— .- .. ....-—.—-..

.7

MES MAINTENANCE PROCEOURE PROC. NO. 7-GN-1oo

PERIODIC TO ANNUAL CONOITION INSPECTION OF REV. 2, CHG. A



7.0 INSTRUCTIONS (’Record S - Satisfactory, U - Unsatisfactory or N/A - Not


II STEP S-U-N/A COMMENTS INITIAL/DATE I

,.

19


=. ...-—.— —.s . .... — .-—.— __ >__________., _ .*- . ..

$;:;-, n n,..+: IIESMAINTENANCEPROCEDURE PROC. NO. 7-GN-1oo

PERIOmC TO ANNUAL CONDITION Inspection OF REV. 2, CHG. A: BELOWTHE-HOOK LIFTING OEVICES PAGE 20 of 21

DATA SHEET (Sheet 4 of S)

HODK IDENTIFICATION RECDRO

Inspection Type (Circle one): Initial ll.lonthlylperiodjc(Specify return to service, pre-Cri tical Lift, etc. )

.,.Inspection Oate Hook LocationlBldg.Hoist Nfg. Hook I.D. No.Hoist Serial No. Hook Capacity /’Hoist Capacity Hook Nfg.Hook Dimension “

Hook Oimwsion “;;

/Hook Dimension “B”

*/””

Origlna if Kncln current

Caliper Serial No. Calibration Date

Hook NDE Accept Rei.ct Date

Qualified Inspector Date

NOTE : *Place Inumbers on lhoo,< as C1OSQ to tj of ]loo~ as practical

/

.r_.T

n 10” TWIST-,,

3

,1; ~– ‘EJECT

~ffq’ /~

—,..,,,.,

iO(AWARREJECT Q)

20

—


—._.....——- -— .. . -.—. . . . . . . . . ..- . .._. —::<.’

,:.. .,n’ ?

klES hlAINTENANCE PROCE~LJRE PROC. NO. 7-GN-100

PERIOOIC TO ANNUAL COtJOITION INSPECTION OF REV. 2, CHG. A



HOOK IDENTIFICATION RECORO

Inspection Type (Circle one): Initial ll$onthlyiPeriodic(Specify return to service, pre-Cri tical Lift, etc. )

Inspection Oate Hook Location jBldg.

Hoist Ilfg, Hook I.D. No..

;;;;?,~E~~

NOTE:

/

*Place l>umbers on Ihook as C(10S2 to ti; of hook as practical

21


,---

..LOAD TEST PROCEDURE

BELOW-THE-HOOK LIFTING OEVICE

.

IPPROVAL:

‘ppROvAL:~ Oate

APPRoVAL: )-fgVe ,(W7-2’?Cr?fie ~nd KlgglFg Tervices atelH2n2ger


1.0 PURPOSE

2.0

3.0

—

0., ‘-l”LOAD TEST IiisTRLJcTIONS

1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to provide a sequence o?operations for load testing a below- ths-hook lifting device.

REFERENCES

2.1 Hanford Site Hoisting ;nd ?igging Hanual OOE-~L-92-36

2.2 h(HC-C14-4-4, VOL. !-3, Industrial Safety Ifanu?.1.—

2.3 Environmental, Safety, ind l+e~lth Progrtn li;nutl

RESPOliSTBILITIES

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3,5

The equipmnt custcdi:n (d?signited by th,? F~cility manzger) isresponsible for ;nsur~r,3 fi:intsnzfi:e insp?ctio;~s <nd testing Ofequip ;,ent are cot ti21irjquent, He IS also responsible fGrmaintaining YECOY6S of ~he repairs, inspections, tests, ?nd zny

‘d. - E? t~ill zssure these records are avail zblemaintenar,ce per fcrr,=for ?udit.

Industrial Safety shall ensure ccc>liance ,,~iti hoisting zndrigging equip-lent reqtiirewnts.

,A desiq”at:d lez<er shtll be ?ppoinced to all h,oi sting and rigging

(H&R) .zctivities, ,,,hichinclude both cri’tical tnd noncriticallifts, For critical lifts, the designated le?d:r nay also be thePIC. For ordintry lifts, the designated 12215er my be a crewmember.

Designated L??der or (if IIe.cd;a)Sit: Crane :nd Rigging Services(SC&RS) Supervisor/or ~esi$nee is responsible for (1) coordinating

the test lift, (2) ensuring a prccedure is pr~pared and ?pproved,(3) ensuring thzt personnel ?re Gualified to perform the work, (4)ensuring thzt all equi; mni and rigging are qualifitd.

3 .4.1 C?si gnated Lezder or Supervisor shall ccnduct a pre-jobmeeting ,,+]thall person ]>el in,volved in the test.

QCjlt~E shall co fitiuct !~DE test of !welds after lozd test. INOErequlrev,ents, if trequ ired, will L?2 call Ed out on design drzwing orlisted 011 the work p;ckzge,

.

23


j——.. .. ........ ... .

‘-o. ?<,. .4.0 REQUIREMENTS

4.1

4.2

4.3

Before ezch load test, confirm that all equipment inSpeCtf OnS andmainte

&&

ce zre cur ent.

Equlp&nt Custodim or Supervisor *

The Equipment Custodizn or the SC?TRS Supervisor shall verify thatall rigging and &ccsss cries inspections are curr?n’.

R% GA~~ & “Equipm#dt Custodian or SCiRS Supervisor

Lo;d test w2i~ht (j? rlo is kncwn ;r.d .docum?ntedwithin a tolerance OT + ;$, -51.. {e]ghts shall be trzcezble to arecognized siandzrd, ‘v:rified hy: Engineering calculations, acalibrated (+0%, -5x) load raeasuring device or calculating loadbased on kno,m unit weights and di,msnsions of test fixture.

4,3.1 Lozd t?st u its zccepted prior to test.

/.&&

Designated’Lezder or SC&RS Supervisor &

5.0 PRE-JOB MEETIIJG

5.1 The Designated Leader or Supervisor shall conduct a pre-jobmeeting prior to v;ork start to r~view this’ procedure with allinvolved persofiRel :nd resolve zay safety concerns. TheSupervisor shall ensure involved perscnnel i:ear appropriate safetyattire (e.g., hard hat, s~fety shces, gloves, safety glasses, zndany other personal protective e~uipment required). A designatedsignal~on~;~ -ppointed by the SC&RS Super isor.

a’-’!lesignatetiLeader or SCiRS Supervisor

*

6.o LOAO TEST

6.1 Barric;de or rope off v:ork ;rea to warn unauthorized personnel. OFload test in progress.

6.2 Position hoot cr device over center of gravity of lozd

6,3 Attach rigging to hook or attachment as directedsupervisor. Stop znd inspect, zdjust rigging as

6.4 Hoist load a fe,w inches ?nd hold for 5 minutes.

by thenEeded.

24


r

—.— .. . .. . . . . . . . .-—. —

f- - ,,n.. T

Set jo;d dow ;nd remove rigging or test “weight assembly.!fisually inspect load bearing parts, to verify that nO damage hasbeen done.

NDE of load bearingwelds afterlo;d test (if required).‘“’ :e~~~$,- ‘T– “::@

7.0 LOAD TEST REPORT

7.1

7,2

Complete lo:d test report.

-.. .-

The reports shall be plzctd in the Crzne History file by the

~qui?~ent c~st Odizn..

25


LOAD TEST REPORT FORM

* BuildingNo./Facility 3a-4 E3Li4. Load Test Date s- z~-~ ‘?

+.1,0. No. 1-13 l~Ode] 1~~, “K IPr Manufacturerl+a.f-S+-ZI[<~

* Rated C:pacity 4 4, fmo* Last Load Test Date L\~,

“eight(s) :i’’ed-

* This Load Test:, leight Lifted L 4, 5 Go)

* Dynamometer: Cal ibration IilNo. $QS—.2 -CL-O”. ; Recal Due Date~-s-~#Rznge 550 +~m t- 5~Lk3’5

Rcmzrks:

[ ] Quality Assurance

[ ] Third ;~rty Verific~tion(Check One)

* he

After Load Test place This Document in the Crane History File.

26

5.3


CASTOR LIFTING BEAM EVALUATION

ENGINEERING SAFETY EVALUATIONSubject;CASTOR LIFTING BEAMEV A-L3JATION Page:LOf~

Checke~ Date_

1.

11.

111.

Objeclive:

The objective of this evaluation is ensure lhe CASTOR Iifring beam meets tbe requirements of the HmfordSite Hoisting and Rigging Manual. ~erequirement isasafeV factor of3tolbastd onyieldsmengtb.

References:

DOE, DoE-RL-92-36, Han/oral.SileHoisling and Rigging A4amw/, Rich land Field Office, Richland, WA.,January, 1993.

HNF-SD-TP.SARP-021, SofeW A..lyJis Reporl for Packaging (Onsile) CASTOR GSF Cask,RFS N WOperations, Richland,WA.

Hudson,R,G.,The Engineers’ Manual, S?cond Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1939.

AI SC, Manual of S1eel Constr.clion, Ninth Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois,1989.

D-Krameciwik, Lifting Beam Structural Calculations, Ratingcn, Germany, May 7, 1996.

Results and Conclusions:

Results of this evaluation verities the CASTOR Lbling Beam meets the requirements of tbe Hoisting andRigging Manual (DOE, 1993). ~ee\aluationi sbascdo nthenominals tien@hso fequivalentG emanstructural steel. Assbomh theevaluation tiesafeV factors fortiemost critical components areequal to orgeatertban3. Within thisevaluation, !he\$eldsa re%smedt ohaveties ames Wcmrals Ven@bastheparentmaterial. Since tbe\velds arenotlocaled critical orhighload areas, they arenot evaluated.

27


ENGINEERING SAFETY EVALUATION

SubjectCASTOR LIFTINGBEAM EVALUATION Pagc~of~

OrigimdocS. S. Shir8ea Datc~

Checker S. R. Crow-. Date:_

IV. Evaluation:

CASTOR LIFTING BEAM EVALUATION!

Assum.dlifingweightofCASTOR wioimpacllimilerS(CAsTORSAm):Wca,t ‘410001bf

Assumedmaximum litlingweiS!htofLifdngBeam:\VmaX :440001bf

Beam material (RSt 37-2) yield strenah: ,37Y ,225Y!!!!! s 37s, = 32.6>ksi

ASTM Equivalent A-570. m?

Eye plate (St 52-2) yield s!rengh:

ASTM Equivalent A-5 16.

Lifiing pin (St 50) yield strength:ASTM Equivalent A-5 15.

,~

J

%

1-’--

z

3/4”7764,

1-

7-lee

-1 “

i!-1068

R45

r

Bm.m Sect, orI Exce,t m noted nil dimen.+ons m mm

28


ENGINEERING SAFETY EVALUATIONSubjecc CASTOR LIFTING BEAM EVALUATION PagtiL0f4

OriginatO~ S. S. $hiram la Date~Checkec S. R. Crow &/X<C Date:~

Determine moment of inertia of I beam section about the axis perpendicular to the web:

Width of flange: wf = 7.3Ein Depth of section: s d = 7.7 Sin Flange thickness: t f ‘0,8%in

‘rlickms of web t ~ = 0.75 in Deplh of web: w~ =s d - 2t f

wfsd3-w,3. (wf-tw)

Moment of i“eflia (Hudson, 1939, page 84) lb~ = lb~ = 168.in412

Distance ofcenter of gravity: d icz =~1bs

Section Modulus:d icg ‘3.87’inSb, .—

d icg

Cross sectional area Ab~ ‘2+ fwf+tww, A b~ = 17.4Vi”2

Area of compression flange Af=tfwf A f = 6.4Vin2

Evaluate to AISC Design Requirements:

Width to thickness ratio ~ =4.19 Limiting width to thickness ratio: —=11,3824 f

/$

Since width to thickness ratio not limiting, section is compact.

Determine value of limiting laterally unsupported length for compact section in strong axis bendins?

76w f— =8.1 St? or

20000— =42.8fi

F‘37y :’d ‘1,~

l,~f/ ksiksi

Unsupported Ienglh ofl beam: Lb = 1740mm Lb=5.7t R

Therefore, since critical length not exceeded flexfurc fillo~ablt Ofbeam i,: s 37b ‘ 0.665 37Y s 37b =21 .54ksi

Loading on Main Beam:

Idealize loading as a simply suppofied beam with a partially distributed uniform load over center section.AISC, 1989, page 2.297.

Lmglh between load: 1, = 1740mm- 2f17Smm) Load width: b , ‘550mm

ll-blD&. . . . from load: ,, ,= a , =42@mm

.Ft

Load on unit: Ft =\Vmax Load per unit length: f, ,— f,= Zolz.!f

bi i“

29


ENGINEERING SAFETY EVALUATION

Subject CASTOR LIFTING BEAM EVALUATION Page&ofQ

Originato~ S. S, Shira a Datc4MlQ&?I

Checker S, R. Crow = . Date:_

~;,~

A A

‘1 ‘2

Sincesymmetrical,reactionloadalloadpoints:~, .yl,

~,l[@i+b]) R ,= 22000dbf

/RMaximum Moment: h{ ~,x = R1,lal. ~

\ J,f, M ~ax=48287~lb~i”

h{ ~ax RIBending stress: ~b ,— ob=ll,l?ksi Shear at Edge ~b ,— , b = 1.2&ksi

S bs A bs

s 37ySafety Factor based on Y,eld Strengh: sFb ,— SFb=3

‘bLoading on Lift Pin:

Assume as cantilevered circular bm.m that is loaded between cask lifting beam, Treat .s short beam.

Pin diametec d pin =58.mm

Cross sectional area ofpix

Distance between pi” suppoflc

Load on pins: ~p .5 F p = 2200@lbf

22

Ap .x,!!?!! Moment of ineriia of cross section:“d pin4,P ,—

4 64

I ps = 1740mm- 2(20+ 135+ 20)mm

1365mmGap between cask and Ming beam:

. !l_‘g

1~ = 0.4!Yin2

30


ENGINEERhTG SAFETY EVALUATION

Subject CASTOR LIFTfNG BEAM EVALUATION Page:&0f4

Originator S. S. Shiraza Date:_

Checker S. R. Crow. ~~/C, Date@VQ3191

(

~ ‘,2~p. Y!

Shearstresson pin:2’

‘P =Tp =7.16.ks,v

31 ~

Bending .Fp”18 ‘pin‘P -

0 ~ = 9.2tVksi

1P 2

Pri”cipd stress: 1=c, ,++l\+j +*: .s, = 13.2ksi

, soySafety Factor based on Yield Strengdr SF p = —- SFP=3

ml

Loading on lifting eye:

Thickness of plate t. =25mm Lmg!h .“ each side of opening: Ie ‘l15mm

Distance to outside edge d .e z 125mm

Tensile sless on lifting ey=Ft.Ct .— u et = 4.9Qksi

2.1 ~.l ~

s 52ySafety Factor based on Yield Strength: SFet SFet ‘Iol

o et

Shear tearout:Ft

.,C, =— z ,Ct = 4,50ksi2t ~d ~e

‘ 52ySafety Factor based o. Yield Strength: SFtet SFtet ’11

T let

31

DISTRIBUTION SHEET

To From Page 1 of 1

Distribution Packaging Engineering Date 04/04/97

Project Title/Work Order EDT No. 619562

Spreader Beam Analysis for the CASTOR GSF Cask ECN No. t4JA(HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026)

Text Text Only Attach./ EDT/ECNNeme MSIN With All Appendix Only

Attach. Only

C. E. Brewer S3-15 xE. P. Clements HI-15 xJ. G. Field HI-15 xS. D. Halstead L1-02 xR. K. Kroshus G4-07 xD. M. LaRue G3-08 xI. L. Metcalf L6-26 xS. S. Shiraga H1-15 xP. J. Weaver L1-02 xCentral Files A3-88HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026 File H1-15 1

A-6000-135 (01/93) !4EF067

Documents

[x]NO o I Dkp.asltion - digital.library.unt.edu/67531/metadc622744/m2/1/high_res_d/16873.pdf · HNF-SD-TP-RPT-026 Rev. O SPREADER BEAM ANALYSIS FOR THE CASTOR GSF CASK 1.0 INTRODUCTION